DJ Lagway inters the transfer Portal.

47,929 Views | 430 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by cowboycwr
Dia del DougO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Watch his first half against A&M and he's an absolute beast.

The second half, not as much.

Gonna be an exciting player. Should be fun to watch.
"The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else when you're uncool."
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So now that we have him signs I wonder if any of the people in this thread that didn't want him, were sure he wasn't coming here, didn't think he was an upgrade, etc. think any differently now. Especially since it seems his coming here has impacted the decisions of a few other players to come here.
RightRevBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

So now that we have him signs I wonder if any of the people in this thread that didn't want him, were sure he wasn't coming here, didn't think he was an upgrade, etc. think any differently now. Especially since it seems his coming here has impacted the decisions of a few other players to come here.


I will say this. My concern was that we would get a big splash talented QB, but not have the money to get him a supporting cast. He could be the genetically engineered creation of Peyton Manning and RG3, but if his OL and the DL is on the level of Midway's he is going to get killed.

I was fine with getting him if it didn't sacrifice getting a solid supporting cast around him. We will have to wait and see I guess.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What a huge mess

cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

What a huge mess




Sadly this is what is needed to start to get some sort of control over this mess. And then schools forcing 2 year contracts
Ewalker80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nothing sad about it to me. This is just as enforceable legally and morally as any contract. Only reason schools haven't been enforcing is bad PR, not a lack of legal merit in the claims. Same with tampering which is tortious interference. It is all coming, along with enforcement of Hoouse settlement terms. Lots of busy lawyers in coming years.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




As much as I wish Duke had fought, it's like having a partner who wants out. Gotta let her go.
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

boognish_bear said:




As much as I wish Duke had fought, it's like having a partner who wants out. Gotta let her go.


I agree. You don't want a player that won't be focused/doesn't want to be there but contracts need to be enforced.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

boognish_bear said:




As much as I wish Duke had fought, it's like having a partner who wants out. Gotta let her go.


I agree. You don't want a player that won't be focused/doesn't want to be there but contracts need to be enforced.


This is what sucks. Miami is willing to pay the player and Duke to take the payout.

In dating, you can let the woman go and then date her mom. Not available in college football. The NCAA needs to make tampering a death penalty offense.

Cowboy, I'll never forget that time at the tailgate you said to me "smell my finger!" And I said what is that? And you said "my exes momma"
RightRevBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I wish Duke would have fought it. A school needs to stand up and take it to court to stop this crap from happening. Every time a settlement happens it tells players that want to leave after signing a contract that they can.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RightRevBear said:

I wish Duke would have fought it. A school needs to stand up and take it to court to stop this crap from happening. Every time a settlement happens it tells players that want to leave after signing a contract that they can.

I agree with you. I'll place this blame on the NCAA. The institutions should suffer if they tamper. In this case, Miami was willing to pay Duke a buyout fee and pay Mensah. If the NCAA made tampering a significant punishable offense, then there would be no way to tamper via contracts.

As I look at this landscape, reigning it in doesn't seem that hard. Fix the football calendar. Open and close the portal after the last game is played. End tampering of players under contract. **** the SEC. All easy.
RightRevBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

RightRevBear said:

I wish Duke would have fought it. A school needs to stand up and take it to court to stop this crap from happening. Every time a settlement happens it tells players that want to leave after signing a contract that they can.

I agree with you. I'll place this blame on the NCAA. The institutions should suffer if they tamper. In this case, Miami was willing to pay Duke a buyout fee and pay Mensah. If the NCAA made tampering a significant punishable offense, then there would be no way to tamper via contracts.

As I look at this landscape, reigning it in doesn't seem that hard. Fix the football calendar. Open and close the portal after the last game is played. End tampering of players under contract. **** the SEC. All easy.


My solution would be to open the portal at the end of the spring. You have to worry about disrupting the academic schedule if you wait until after the championship.
Bearknuckle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RightRevBear said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

RightRevBear said:

I wish Duke would have fought it. A school needs to stand up and take it to court to stop this crap from happening. Every time a settlement happens it tells players that want to leave after signing a contract that they can.

I agree with you. I'll place this blame on the NCAA. The institutions should suffer if they tamper. In this case, Miami was willing to pay Duke a buyout fee and pay Mensah. If the NCAA made tampering a significant punishable offense, then there would be no way to tamper via contracts.

As I look at this landscape, reigning it in doesn't seem that hard. Fix the football calendar. Open and close the portal after the last game is played. End tampering of players under contract. **** the SEC. All easy.


My solution would be to open the portal at the end of the spring. You have to worry about disrupting the academic schedule if you wait until after the championship.

no. The portal has to open, and ideally should be closed, be before the start of Spring Camp. Too many plans are laid during Spring Camp to capsize them with massive roster turnover.
PaperBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RightRevBear said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

RightRevBear said:

I wish Duke would have fought it. A school needs to stand up and take it to court to stop this crap from happening. Every time a settlement happens it tells players that want to leave after signing a contract that they can.

I agree with you. I'll place this blame on the NCAA. The institutions should suffer if they tamper. In this case, Miami was willing to pay Duke a buyout fee and pay Mensah. If the NCAA made tampering a significant punishable offense, then there would be no way to tamper via contracts.

As I look at this landscape, reigning it in doesn't seem that hard. Fix the football calendar. Open and close the portal after the last game is played. End tampering of players under contract. **** the SEC. All easy.


My solution would be to open the portal at the end of the spring. You have to worry about disrupting the academic schedule if you wait until after the championship.


The NCAA is toothless. They are pretty much the equivalent of an HOA that loses in court over somebody's trash cans being out an extra day. From that day forward homeowners that want to build ... whatever ... tell em to piss off or get sued again.
PartyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RightRevBear said:

I wish Duke would have fought it. A school needs to stand up and take it to court to stop this crap from happening. Every time a settlement happens it tells players that want to leave after signing a contract that they can.


If Duke received what they reasonably should have received to be made whole, and I assume they did and hence the settlement, then they did all the could and there was no point of further litigation to end up at the same point.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well...we are up there with some big spending schools (other than Ok St) at this one position

cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

Well...we are up there with some big spending schools (other than Ok St) at this one position




Interesting how the rankings of these same 10 QBs changed once they announced their new school….
datboiquadzilla
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

Well...we are up there with some big spending schools (other than Ok St) at this one position




Baylor appearance on this list, you just LOVE to see it.
perrynative
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The tidal wave of good transfers after hid signing has been impressive.
datboiquadzilla
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I agree
Ewalker80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Out of these 10, DJ has the highest upside. I'm not sure you can seriously debate that. Whether he reaches that potential is of course to be seen. Is sure as heck gives me something to look forward to watch this season though, particularly with our newly revamped WR core. We have the potential to have more successful deep balls than we've had since Seth.
muddybrazos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There really isnt much point of taking a lot of younger qbs. If theyre good they will just leave after a year if they dont play. May as well just buy a good qb in the portal every year.
Chuckroast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hopefully, we can keep Lagway one more year. Would be great for continuity, and maybe he can help us recruit a good haul next year in the portal.
Timbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
muddybrazos said:

There really isnt much point of taking a lot of younger qbs. If theyre good they will just leave after a year if they dont play. May as well just buy a good qb in the portal every year.


Pay a good backup. QB's get hurt. Dj has an injury history plus 28 TD's, 25 INTs in 2 years.
muddybrazos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Timbear said:

muddybrazos said:

There really isnt much point of taking a lot of younger qbs. If theyre good they will just leave after a year if they dont play. May as well just buy a good qb in the portal every year.


Pay a good backup. QB's get hurt. Dj has an injury history plus 28 TD's, 25 INTs in 2 years.

I agree but Dj was also thrown right into the fire and was the only hope to save his coaches job. He definitely regressed his soph year but was playing hurt. I think we see a much better version of him this fall.
Chuckroast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lagway had 1 or fewer interceptions in 9 out of 12 games last year. He had 3 in an abysmal team effort against KY and 5 against LSU. A couple of bad games really skewed his numbers. When you compare the experience and success he has had before coming here to Sawyer's, there is no comparison, and Sawyer certainly did OK.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Glad Lagway is locked down

Timbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
muddybrazos said:

Timbear said:

muddybrazos said:

There really isnt much point of taking a lot of younger qbs. If theyre good they will just leave after a year if they dont play. May as well just buy a good qb in the portal every year.


Pay a good backup. QB's get hurt. Dj has an injury history plus 28 TD's, 25 INTs in 2 years.

I agree but Dj was also thrown right into the fire and was the only hope to save his coaches job. He definitely regressed his soph year but was playing hurt. I think we see a much better version of him this fall.


I agree. It seems like DJ's best football is ahead of him at Baylor.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chuckroast said:

Lagway had 1 or fewer interceptions in 9 out of 12 games last year. He had 3 in an abysmal team effort against KY and 5 against LSU. A couple of bad games really skewed his numbers. When you compare the experience and success he has had before coming here to Sawyer's, there is no comparison, and Sawyer certainly did OK.
This is the point Lagway skeptics miss. We're getting him after his growth years for what should be a prime season or seasons. Any mistakes he's made to this point were made while he was a freshman or sophomore. We're getting him with 20-plus games of experience and throwing him into a proven system with a proven QB developer.

Odds are very high that the version of DJ Lagway that we get will be better (potentially substantially so) than what was seen at Florida.
Youre a clown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Our offensive system is fine, but I think taking basically an entire new class of transfers and underclassman with no game experience and expecting them to form a cohesive unit in one off-season with the current coaching staff is a tall order. Also, the loss of Pendergrass was downplayed big time going into 2025, and I feel the same way about Bryson Washington. When healthy, he was a really good running back.
Chuckroast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Youre a clown said:

Our offensive system is fine, but I think taking basically an entire new class of transfers and underclassman with no game experience and expecting them to form a cohesive unit in one off-season with the current coaching staff is a tall order. Also, the loss of Pendergrass was downplayed big time going into 2025, and I feel the same way about Bryson Washington. When healthy, he was a really good running back.


Forming a cohesive unit each year is the biggest challenge in college football now that most programs are losing a third of their players every year to the portal. At least it's not a problem that we alone will be dealing with..
CaseyBu72
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BluesBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I would continue to bring in a good crop of HS kids to grow into some positions - after their sophomore year - you sign them to 2 -3 year contracts (for those you want to keep). You continue to use the portal to lock down those with 2 years of eligibility - QB, RB, WR, OL, DL, LB and DB...You get in a yoy situation that you always have deep talent on both sides of the ball with a lot of experience and you'd have a good year for overlapping of that talent. Mix in the original HS kids you signed who you've kept in the program (3 star sort of guys) to fill in for injuries, etc.

You only sign 1 year deals in extreme situations - when you have a big hole to fill and no availability with current roster.

Additional Revenue Ideas for the Players:

1. You put up a huge tent in the parking lot area to sell SIGNED player gear, football, mini helmets, etc. People will buy more if the item is right there available to see/touch and take home afterwards

2. You have pre-game "meet your player" tickets you can purchase. Go down on the field, get a few minutes with the player to talk, sign some **** and take some pictures. Sell tickets ahead of time.

Sure I can think of some other ideas - I just think Baylor does not do a good job making player interactions available like they could.....maybe if a player is making $100K it doesn't matter them....don't know...
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.