Ohio Republican Governor Mike DeWine vetoes bill banning hormone blockers, transgender surgeries for children under 18.
— AF Post (@AFpost) December 29, 2023
Follow: @AFpost pic.twitter.com/xBZdVn82dC
If it's beyond physics, then it's supernatural. That's what supernatural means.Waco1947 said:Beyond physics. Love is here and now. For example Physics nor science can determine if you love your wife.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:And here we go again with the same incoherent, contradictory nonsense where you repeatedly reject the supernatural but then espouse concepts that are completely supernatural.Waco1947 said:The job of science is not disprove the supernatural (although as a happy by product science dismisses superstition and the supernatural). Historian, you are trying to use science to prove the supernatural. Science could give a pfft about the supernatural.historian said:
Immediately after your question are the applicable passages from Psalm 19 and Romans 1. The existence of God is self-evident to everyone who opens their eyes and pays attention.
It might not be the job of science to disprove the supernatural but it is the job of real science to prove their own theories or "assertions". If those assertions are contrary to God's word then any attempts to prove them are the same thing as disproving the supernatural.
it is the job of real science to prove their own theories or "assertions". If those assertions are contrary to God's word then any attempts to prove them are the same thing as disproving the supernatural.
Because supernatural entities (i.e. the "God" of conservatives) are not a part of nature, supernatural entities cannot be investigated by science. In this sense, science and religion are separate and address aspects of human understanding in different ways. Attempts to pit science and religion against each other create controversy where none needs to exist.
The realm of faith is not science but love as in God is love and You shall love God and your neighbor as yourself. This is purview of the Christian faith. Challenge me on the witness of love in our world but not superstition and the supernatural.
My faith stance stumps you because you want to engage in a nonsensical debate about the supernatural. I would invite you to consider and live into the love commandment and ways you and I can share the good news of Jesus Christ.
The invitation to love alongside me is somehow foreign to you but we are Christian brothers in the faith.
Time and time again you've been shown this, but your response is either to pile even more incoherent, contradictory nonsense on top, or you choose not to respond all, completely ignoring people's questions that illustrate the fact.
But you've invited a challenge to your "witness of love", so here's a start:
Question: Is "love" a product of physics, or is it beyond physics?
Waco, just stop.Waco1947 said:Beyond physics. Love is here and now. For example Physics nor science can determine if you love your wife.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:And here we go again with the same incoherent, contradictory nonsense where you repeatedly reject the supernatural but then espouse concepts that are completely supernatural.Waco1947 said:The job of science is not disprove the supernatural (although as a happy by product science dismisses superstition and the supernatural). Historian, you are trying to use science to prove the supernatural. Science could give a pfft about the supernatural.historian said:
Immediately after your question are the applicable passages from Psalm 19 and Romans 1. The existence of God is self-evident to everyone who opens their eyes and pays attention.
It might not be the job of science to disprove the supernatural but it is the job of real science to prove their own theories or "assertions". If those assertions are contrary to God's word then any attempts to prove them are the same thing as disproving the supernatural.
it is the job of real science to prove their own theories or "assertions". If those assertions are contrary to God's word then any attempts to prove them are the same thing as disproving the supernatural.
Because supernatural entities (i.e. the "God" of conservatives) are not a part of nature, supernatural entities cannot be investigated by science. In this sense, science and religion are separate and address aspects of human understanding in different ways. Attempts to pit science and religion against each other create controversy where none needs to exist.
The realm of faith is not science but love as in God is love and You shall love God and your neighbor as yourself. This is purview of the Christian faith. Challenge me on the witness of love in our world but not superstition and the supernatural.
My faith stance stumps you because you want to engage in a nonsensical debate about the supernatural. I would invite you to consider and live into the love commandment and ways you and I can share the good news of Jesus Christ.
The invitation to love alongside me is somehow foreign to you but we are Christian brothers in the faith.
Time and time again you've been shown this, but your response is either to pile even more incoherent, contradictory nonsense on top, or you choose not to respond all, completely ignoring people's questions that illustrate the fact.
But you've invited a challenge to your "witness of love", so here's a start:
Question: Is "love" a product of physics, or is it beyond physics?
America is so insane when it comes to child sex changes that while the rest of the world is getting rid of these surgeries for minors, even "republican" governors in America can't bring themselves to ban them. https://t.co/RKdcAitULL
— Michael Seifert (@realmichaelseif) December 29, 2023
FIFY pedo.Waco1947 said:Beyond physics. Love is here and now. For example Physics nor science can determine ifBusyTarpDuster2017 said:And here we go again with the same incoherent, contradictory nonsense where you repeatedly reject the supernatural but then espouse concepts that are completely supernatural.Waco1947 said:The job of science is not disprove the supernatural (although as a happy by product science dismisses superstition and the supernatural). Historian, you are trying to use science to prove the supernatural. Science could give a pfft about the supernatural.historian said:
Immediately after your question are the applicable passages from Psalm 19 and Romans 1. The existence of God is self-evident to everyone who opens their eyes and pays attention.
It might not be the job of science to disprove the supernatural but it is the job of real science to prove their own theories or "assertions". If those assertions are contrary to God's word then any attempts to prove them are the same thing as disproving the supernatural.
it is the job of real science to prove their own theories or "assertions". If those assertions are contrary to God's word then any attempts to prove them are the same thing as disproving the supernatural.
Because supernatural entities (i.e. the "God" of conservatives) are not a part of nature, supernatural entities cannot be investigated by science. In this sense, science and religion are separate and address aspects of human understanding in different ways. Attempts to pit science and religion against each other create controversy where none needs to exist.
The realm of faith is not science but love as in God is love and You shall love God and your neighbor as yourself. This is purview of the Christian faith. Challenge me on the witness of love in our world but not superstition and the supernatural.
My faith stance stumps you because you want to engage in a nonsensical debate about the supernatural. I would invite you to consider and live into the love commandment and ways you and I can share the good news of Jesus Christ.
The invitation to love alongside me is somehow foreign to you but we are Christian brothers in the faith.
Time and time again you've been shown this, but your response is either to pile even more incoherent, contradictory nonsense on top, or you choose not to respond all, completely ignoring people's questions that illustrate the fact.
But you've invited a challenge to your "witness of love", so here's a start:
Question: Is "love" a product of physics, or is it beyond physics?youI loveyour wifelittle boys.
If you don’t want to use neo-pronouns~
— L G B (@L__G__B) December 30, 2023
“…just use no pronouns while referring to me…”
💀Ma’am, I’m just going to go ahead and warn you, you are gonna be misgendered. It’s nonnegotiable at this point.
pic.twitter.com/afMsIIR2H5
— 💚🤍💜Lydia the Terf - Agent 27168💚🤍💜🦖🦕🐊 (@LydiaXXUntoward) December 30, 2023
nein51 said:— 💚🤍💜Lydia the Terf - Agent 27168💚🤍💜🦖🦕🐊 (@LydiaXXUntoward) December 30, 2023
This just goes to show that you can start out as one person and completely change into someone new. pic.twitter.com/HpgvqEVifH
— Dr. Jebra Faushay (@JebraFaushay) January 1, 2024
The very first joke in Dave Chappelle's new special, The Dreamer, is about the ridiculousness of being pressured to go along with the lies of transgenderism. pic.twitter.com/6PKYEi5dvL
— Genevieve Gluck (@WomenReadWomen) January 1, 2024
Violet is so powerful in her femininity, how could you doubt her? pic.twitter.com/gjCL2haYxM
— Dr. Jebra Faushay (@JebraFaushay) January 2, 2024
So wouldn't a man, appropriating a feminine identity, appropriating feminine attributes, andJack Bauer said:
I'd rather be trapped in Buffalo Bill's pit putting lotion on my skin than get coaching from this 'person'...🤡Going to Jeffrey Marsh for LIFE COACHING on subjects like misogyny and racism?
— L G B (@L__G__B) December 14, 2023
Please don’t send your kids to this~ pic.twitter.com/bZWaPcOICi
Prove the supernatural exists?BusyTarpDuster2017 said:If it's beyond physics, then it's supernatural. That's what supernatural means.Waco1947 said:Beyond physics. Love is here and now. For example Physics nor science can determine if you love your wife.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:And here we go again with the same incoherent, contradictory nonsense where you repeatedly reject the supernatural but then espouse concepts that are completely supernatural.Waco1947 said:The job of science is not disprove the supernatural (although as a happy by product science dismisses superstition and the supernatural). Historian, you are trying to use science to prove the supernatural. Science could give a pfft about the supernatural.historian said:
Immediately after your question are the applicable passages from Psalm 19 and Romans 1. The existence of God is self-evident to everyone who opens their eyes and pays attention.
It might not be the job of science to disprove the supernatural but it is the job of real science to prove their own theories or "assertions". If those assertions are contrary to God's word then any attempts to prove them are the same thing as disproving the supernatural.
it is the job of real science to prove their own theories or "assertions". If those assertions are contrary to God's word then any attempts to prove them are the same thing as disproving the supernatural.
Because supernatural entities (i.e. the "God" of conservatives) are not a part of nature, supernatural entities cannot be investigated by science. In this sense, science and religion are separate and address aspects of human understanding in different ways. Attempts to pit science and religion against each other create controversy where none needs to exist.
The realm of faith is not science but love as in God is love and You shall love God and your neighbor as yourself. This is purview of the Christian faith. Challenge me on the witness of love in our world but not superstition and the supernatural.
My faith stance stumps you because you want to engage in a nonsensical debate about the supernatural. I would invite you to consider and live into the love commandment and ways you and I can share the good news of Jesus Christ.
The invitation to love alongside me is somehow foreign to you but we are Christian brothers in the faith.
Time and time again you've been shown this, but your response is either to pile even more incoherent, contradictory nonsense on top, or you choose not to respond all, completely ignoring people's questions that illustrate the fact.
But you've invited a challenge to your "witness of love", so here's a start:
Question: Is "love" a product of physics, or is it beyond physics?
So you DO believe in the supernatural, correct?
The Big Bang. From nothing came everything. All at once. Maybe you don't know how to label what happened correctly because you're hung up on the word "supernatural" because reminds you of cults, ghost stories and silly movies. It can also be used to label actual events we do not yet have the ability to quantify, as it has throughout history. But an ant who deciphers how a carburetor works doesn't get to declare that knowledge as evidence there is no Ford. Maybe one day we'll be able to understand how Jesus came to be and what made his miracles possible, but leaving it labeled "supernatural" for now doesn't negate its existence.Waco1947 said:Prove the supernatural exists?BusyTarpDuster2017 said:If it's beyond physics, then it's supernatural. That's what supernatural means.Waco1947 said:Beyond physics. Love is here and now. For example Physics nor science can determine if you love your wife.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:And here we go again with the same incoherent, contradictory nonsense where you repeatedly reject the supernatural but then espouse concepts that are completely supernatural.Waco1947 said:The job of science is not disprove the supernatural (although as a happy by product science dismisses superstition and the supernatural). Historian, you are trying to use science to prove the supernatural. Science could give a pfft about the supernatural.historian said:
Immediately after your question are the applicable passages from Psalm 19 and Romans 1. The existence of God is self-evident to everyone who opens their eyes and pays attention.
It might not be the job of science to disprove the supernatural but it is the job of real science to prove their own theories or "assertions". If those assertions are contrary to God's word then any attempts to prove them are the same thing as disproving the supernatural.
it is the job of real science to prove their own theories or "assertions". If those assertions are contrary to God's word then any attempts to prove them are the same thing as disproving the supernatural.
Because supernatural entities (i.e. the "God" of conservatives) are not a part of nature, supernatural entities cannot be investigated by science. In this sense, science and religion are separate and address aspects of human understanding in different ways. Attempts to pit science and religion against each other create controversy where none needs to exist.
The realm of faith is not science but love as in God is love and You shall love God and your neighbor as yourself. This is purview of the Christian faith. Challenge me on the witness of love in our world but not superstition and the supernatural.
My faith stance stumps you because you want to engage in a nonsensical debate about the supernatural. I would invite you to consider and live into the love commandment and ways you and I can share the good news of Jesus Christ.
The invitation to love alongside me is somehow foreign to you but we are Christian brothers in the faith.
Time and time again you've been shown this, but your response is either to pile even more incoherent, contradictory nonsense on top, or you choose not to respond all, completely ignoring people's questions that illustrate the fact.
But you've invited a challenge to your "witness of love", so here's a start:
Question: Is "love" a product of physics, or is it beyond physics?
So you DO believe in the supernatural, correct?
Forest Bueller_bf said:So wouldn't a man, appropriating a feminine identity, appropriating feminine attributes, andJack Bauer said:
I'd rather be trapped in Buffalo Bill's pit putting lotion on my skin than get coaching from this 'person'...🤡Going to Jeffrey Marsh for LIFE COACHING on subjects like misogyny and racism?
— L G B (@L__G__B) December 14, 2023
Please don’t send your kids to this~ pic.twitter.com/bZWaPcOICi
mockingly using "woman speak" and "woman face" be the ultimate misogynist.
Waco1947 said:Prove the supernatural exists?BusyTarpDuster2017 said:If it's beyond physics, then it's supernatural. That's what supernatural means.Waco1947 said:Beyond physics. Love is here and now. For example Physics nor science can determine if you love your wife.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:And here we go again with the same incoherent, contradictory nonsense where you repeatedly reject the supernatural but then espouse concepts that are completely supernatural.Waco1947 said:The job of science is not disprove the supernatural (although as a happy by product science dismisses superstition and the supernatural). Historian, you are trying to use science to prove the supernatural. Science could give a pfft about the supernatural.historian said:
Immediately after your question are the applicable passages from Psalm 19 and Romans 1. The existence of God is self-evident to everyone who opens their eyes and pays attention.
It might not be the job of science to disprove the supernatural but it is the job of real science to prove their own theories or "assertions". If those assertions are contrary to God's word then any attempts to prove them are the same thing as disproving the supernatural.
it is the job of real science to prove their own theories or "assertions". If those assertions are contrary to God's word then any attempts to prove them are the same thing as disproving the supernatural.
Because supernatural entities (i.e. the "God" of conservatives) are not a part of nature, supernatural entities cannot be investigated by science. In this sense, science and religion are separate and address aspects of human understanding in different ways. Attempts to pit science and religion against each other create controversy where none needs to exist.
The realm of faith is not science but love as in God is love and You shall love God and your neighbor as yourself. This is purview of the Christian faith. Challenge me on the witness of love in our world but not superstition and the supernatural.
My faith stance stumps you because you want to engage in a nonsensical debate about the supernatural. I would invite you to consider and live into the love commandment and ways you and I can share the good news of Jesus Christ.
The invitation to love alongside me is somehow foreign to you but we are Christian brothers in the faith.
Time and time again you've been shown this, but your response is either to pile even more incoherent, contradictory nonsense on top, or you choose not to respond all, completely ignoring people's questions that illustrate the fact.
But you've invited a challenge to your "witness of love", so here's a start:
Question: Is "love" a product of physics, or is it beyond physics?
So you DO believe in the supernatural, correct?
Dude looks like a pervert.Redbrickbear said:
God I hate the institutional GOPOhio Republican Governor Mike DeWine vetoes bill banning hormone blockers, transgender surgeries for children under 18.
— AF Post (@AFpost) December 29, 2023
Follow: @AFpost pic.twitter.com/xBZdVn82dC
Man dating a "trans woman" (male) justifies himself to his best friend:
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) January 2, 2024
"I’m not gay. I'm an alpha male attracted to femininity and that's what I got." pic.twitter.com/D53eKCGqhs
One of the myriad questions 47 refuses to answer is why is blackface bad but Girlface is FABULOUS!historian said:Forest Bueller_bf said:So wouldn't a man, appropriating a feminine identity, appropriating feminine attributes, andJack Bauer said:
I'd rather be trapped in Buffalo Bill's pit putting lotion on my skin than get coaching from this 'person'...🤡Going to Jeffrey Marsh for LIFE COACHING on subjects like misogyny and racism?
— L G B (@L__G__B) December 14, 2023
Please don’t send your kids to this~ pic.twitter.com/bZWaPcOICi
mockingly using "woman speak" and "woman face" be the ultimate misogynist.
Yes
YOU prove it. You're the one asserting that it exists, correct? If you're saying love is a real thing, and that it is not a product of physics, then you're saying it is supernatural. Moreover, you're also asserting that this "love" is something that our physical brains can sense, and it can spur us to action or cause us to think differently. If this is true, then this means you believe something that is outside of physics (i.e. supernatural) has the power to impact the physical world. So if you believe this, why is it so hard for you to believe a supernatural God can do the same? You do believe God is supernatural, don't you?Waco1947 said:Prove the supernatural exists?BusyTarpDuster2017 said:If it's beyond physics, then it's supernatural. That's what supernatural means.Waco1947 said:Beyond physics. Love is here and now. For example Physics nor science can determine if you love your wife.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:And here we go again with the same incoherent, contradictory nonsense where you repeatedly reject the supernatural but then espouse concepts that are completely supernatural.Waco1947 said:The job of science is not disprove the supernatural (although as a happy by product science dismisses superstition and the supernatural). Historian, you are trying to use science to prove the supernatural. Science could give a pfft about the supernatural.historian said:
Immediately after your question are the applicable passages from Psalm 19 and Romans 1. The existence of God is self-evident to everyone who opens their eyes and pays attention.
It might not be the job of science to disprove the supernatural but it is the job of real science to prove their own theories or "assertions". If those assertions are contrary to God's word then any attempts to prove them are the same thing as disproving the supernatural.
it is the job of real science to prove their own theories or "assertions". If those assertions are contrary to God's word then any attempts to prove them are the same thing as disproving the supernatural.
Because supernatural entities (i.e. the "God" of conservatives) are not a part of nature, supernatural entities cannot be investigated by science. In this sense, science and religion are separate and address aspects of human understanding in different ways. Attempts to pit science and religion against each other create controversy where none needs to exist.
The realm of faith is not science but love as in God is love and You shall love God and your neighbor as yourself. This is purview of the Christian faith. Challenge me on the witness of love in our world but not superstition and the supernatural.
My faith stance stumps you because you want to engage in a nonsensical debate about the supernatural. I would invite you to consider and live into the love commandment and ways you and I can share the good news of Jesus Christ.
The invitation to love alongside me is somehow foreign to you but we are Christian brothers in the faith.
Time and time again you've been shown this, but your response is either to pile even more incoherent, contradictory nonsense on top, or you choose not to respond all, completely ignoring people's questions that illustrate the fact.
But you've invited a challenge to your "witness of love", so here's a start:
Question: Is "love" a product of physics, or is it beyond physics?
So you DO believe in the supernatural, correct?
Waco1947 said:Prove the supernatural exists?BusyTarpDuster2017 said:If it's beyond physics, then it's supernatural. That's what supernatural means.Waco1947 said:Beyond physics. Love is here and now. For example Physics nor science can determine if you love your wife.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:And here we go again with the same incoherent, contradictory nonsense where you repeatedly reject the supernatural but then espouse concepts that are completely supernatural.Waco1947 said:The job of science is not disprove the supernatural (although as a happy by product science dismisses superstition and the supernatural). Historian, you are trying to use science to prove the supernatural. Science could give a pfft about the supernatural.historian said:
Immediately after your question are the applicable passages from Psalm 19 and Romans 1. The existence of God is self-evident to everyone who opens their eyes and pays attention.
It might not be the job of science to disprove the supernatural but it is the job of real science to prove their own theories or "assertions". If those assertions are contrary to God's word then any attempts to prove them are the same thing as disproving the supernatural.
it is the job of real science to prove their own theories or "assertions". If those assertions are contrary to God's word then any attempts to prove them are the same thing as disproving the supernatural.
Because supernatural entities (i.e. the "God" of conservatives) are not a part of nature, supernatural entities cannot be investigated by science. In this sense, science and religion are separate and address aspects of human understanding in different ways. Attempts to pit science and religion against each other create controversy where none needs to exist.
The realm of faith is not science but love as in God is love and You shall love God and your neighbor as yourself. This is purview of the Christian faith. Challenge me on the witness of love in our world but not superstition and the supernatural.
My faith stance stumps you because you want to engage in a nonsensical debate about the supernatural. I would invite you to consider and live into the love commandment and ways you and I can share the good news of Jesus Christ.
The invitation to love alongside me is somehow foreign to you but we are Christian brothers in the faith.
Time and time again you've been shown this, but your response is either to pile even more incoherent, contradictory nonsense on top, or you choose not to respond all, completely ignoring people's questions that illustrate the fact.
But you've invited a challenge to your "witness of love", so here's a start:
Question: Is "love" a product of physics, or is it beyond physics?
So you DO believe in the supernatural, correct?
Do you believe in ghosts? A simple yes or no answer will suffice.Waco1947 said:Prove the supernatural exists?BusyTarpDuster2017 said:If it's beyond physics, then it's supernatural. That's what supernatural means.Waco1947 said:Beyond physics. Love is here and now. For example Physics nor science can determine if you love your wife.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:And here we go again with the same incoherent, contradictory nonsense where you repeatedly reject the supernatural but then espouse concepts that are completely supernatural.Waco1947 said:The job of science is not disprove the supernatural (although as a happy by product science dismisses superstition and the supernatural). Historian, you are trying to use science to prove the supernatural. Science could give a pfft about the supernatural.historian said:
Immediately after your question are the applicable passages from Psalm 19 and Romans 1. The existence of God is self-evident to everyone who opens their eyes and pays attention.
It might not be the job of science to disprove the supernatural but it is the job of real science to prove their own theories or "assertions". If those assertions are contrary to God's word then any attempts to prove them are the same thing as disproving the supernatural.
it is the job of real science to prove their own theories or "assertions". If those assertions are contrary to God's word then any attempts to prove them are the same thing as disproving the supernatural.
Because supernatural entities (i.e. the "God" of conservatives) are not a part of nature, supernatural entities cannot be investigated by science. In this sense, science and religion are separate and address aspects of human understanding in different ways. Attempts to pit science and religion against each other create controversy where none needs to exist.
The realm of faith is not science but love as in God is love and You shall love God and your neighbor as yourself. This is purview of the Christian faith. Challenge me on the witness of love in our world but not superstition and the supernatural.
My faith stance stumps you because you want to engage in a nonsensical debate about the supernatural. I would invite you to consider and live into the love commandment and ways you and I can share the good news of Jesus Christ.
The invitation to love alongside me is somehow foreign to you but we are Christian brothers in the faith.
Time and time again you've been shown this, but your response is either to pile even more incoherent, contradictory nonsense on top, or you choose not to respond all, completely ignoring people's questions that illustrate the fact.
But you've invited a challenge to your "witness of love", so here's a start:
Question: Is "love" a product of physics, or is it beyond physics?
So you DO believe in the supernatural, correct?
Personally, no. Too many of them lie for me to believe.RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:Do you believe in ghosts? A simple yes or no answer will suffice.Waco1947 said:Prove the supernatural exists?BusyTarpDuster2017 said:If it's beyond physics, then it's supernatural. That's what supernatural means.Waco1947 said:Beyond physics. Love is here and now. For example Physics nor science can determine if you love your wife.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:And here we go again with the same incoherent, contradictory nonsense where you repeatedly reject the supernatural but then espouse concepts that are completely supernatural.Waco1947 said:The job of science is not disprove the supernatural (although as a happy by product science dismisses superstition and the supernatural). Historian, you are trying to use science to prove the supernatural. Science could give a pfft about the supernatural.historian said:
Immediately after your question are the applicable passages from Psalm 19 and Romans 1. The existence of God is self-evident to everyone who opens their eyes and pays attention.
It might not be the job of science to disprove the supernatural but it is the job of real science to prove their own theories or "assertions". If those assertions are contrary to God's word then any attempts to prove them are the same thing as disproving the supernatural.
it is the job of real science to prove their own theories or "assertions". If those assertions are contrary to God's word then any attempts to prove them are the same thing as disproving the supernatural.
Because supernatural entities (i.e. the "God" of conservatives) are not a part of nature, supernatural entities cannot be investigated by science. In this sense, science and religion are separate and address aspects of human understanding in different ways. Attempts to pit science and religion against each other create controversy where none needs to exist.
The realm of faith is not science but love as in God is love and You shall love God and your neighbor as yourself. This is purview of the Christian faith. Challenge me on the witness of love in our world but not superstition and the supernatural.
My faith stance stumps you because you want to engage in a nonsensical debate about the supernatural. I would invite you to consider and live into the love commandment and ways you and I can share the good news of Jesus Christ.
The invitation to love alongside me is somehow foreign to you but we are Christian brothers in the faith.
Time and time again you've been shown this, but your response is either to pile even more incoherent, contradictory nonsense on top, or you choose not to respond all, completely ignoring people's questions that illustrate the fact.
But you've invited a challenge to your "witness of love", so here's a start:
Question: Is "love" a product of physics, or is it beyond physics?
So you DO believe in the supernatural, correct?
Waco1947 said:
The burden of proof is on you, because you are the one who maintains God as supernatural not me
Waco, you really ought to consult a dictionary before posting a claim like that.Waco1947 said:
The burden of proof is on you, because you are the one who maintains God as supernatural not me
But you are the one who is maintaining that love is supernatural. So why isn't the burden also on you?Waco1947 said:
The burden of proof is on you, because you are the one who maintains God as supernatural not me
We have laws of nature and physics. What and why is their origin?Waco1947 said:Prove the supernatural exists?BusyTarpDuster2017 said:If it's beyond physics, then it's supernatural. That's what supernatural means.Waco1947 said:Beyond physics. Love is here and now. For example Physics nor science can determine if you love your wife.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:And here we go again with the same incoherent, contradictory nonsense where you repeatedly reject the supernatural but then espouse concepts that are completely supernatural.Waco1947 said:The job of science is not disprove the supernatural (although as a happy by product science dismisses superstition and the supernatural). Historian, you are trying to use science to prove the supernatural. Science could give a pfft about the supernatural.historian said:
Immediately after your question are the applicable passages from Psalm 19 and Romans 1. The existence of God is self-evident to everyone who opens their eyes and pays attention.
It might not be the job of science to disprove the supernatural but it is the job of real science to prove their own theories or "assertions". If those assertions are contrary to God's word then any attempts to prove them are the same thing as disproving the supernatural.
it is the job of real science to prove their own theories or "assertions". If those assertions are contrary to God's word then any attempts to prove them are the same thing as disproving the supernatural.
Because supernatural entities (i.e. the "God" of conservatives) are not a part of nature, supernatural entities cannot be investigated by science. In this sense, science and religion are separate and address aspects of human understanding in different ways. Attempts to pit science and religion against each other create controversy where none needs to exist.
The realm of faith is not science but love as in God is love and You shall love God and your neighbor as yourself. This is purview of the Christian faith. Challenge me on the witness of love in our world but not superstition and the supernatural.
My faith stance stumps you because you want to engage in a nonsensical debate about the supernatural. I would invite you to consider and live into the love commandment and ways you and I can share the good news of Jesus Christ.
The invitation to love alongside me is somehow foreign to you but we are Christian brothers in the faith.
Time and time again you've been shown this, but your response is either to pile even more incoherent, contradictory nonsense on top, or you choose not to respond all, completely ignoring people's questions that illustrate the fact.
But you've invited a challenge to your "witness of love", so here's a start:
Question: Is "love" a product of physics, or is it beyond physics?
So you DO believe in the supernatural, correct?
I hate to tell this dude, but there are alpha males who are gay too.Jack Bauer said:Man dating a "trans woman" (male) justifies himself to his best friend:
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) January 2, 2024
"I’m not gay. I'm an alpha male attracted to femininity and that's what I got." pic.twitter.com/D53eKCGqhs
