FLBear5630 said:
Oldbear83 said:
I admit when I am wrong. I simply don't admit to being wrong when
A) I am right and you don't want to admit it, or
B) you define "wrong" as 'has a different opinion"
But I do agree that this should be sorted out by the committee.
If there is evidence, resigning from Congress should not keep it hidden, but if this is just accusations without support, we saw that crap with the BS claims about Trump and Russia and also the shameless lying by Democrats during Kavanaugh's confirmation.
That is, if this is just more crap made up by Democrats hoping the accusation doesn't have to be proven, then everyone who had a part in spreading those rumors and accusations should be marked as liars and frauds.
Well, there are three that have serious questions Gaetz, Gabbard and Kennedy. They are legit questions, or Dems BS. They need to answer questions and tell the American people why it is not an issue. Not be a rubber stamp. Gabbard is buddies with Assad, why is that not an issue for Intel? Gaetz has Senators telling of him bragging about crushing ED pills and Red Bull to go all night. RFK, enough said. I am not saying don't approve, but make them explain themselves.
"explain themselves"?
No.
Bring up the allegations but require the accusers to support their claims with more than emotion.
Otherwise, this is the same crap we saw in that "dossier" or the "rape" claim against Kavanaugh.
If Gaetz, Gabbard, or RFK Jr is really guilty, don't let them run from the truth.
But if the accusations are not truth, nail the accusers to the wall.
I'm done with letting people throw out vile claims then just pretend nothing happened when they can't prove anything.