Married A Horn said:
Porteroso said:
Married A Horn said:
Porteroso said:
Married A Horn said:
Assassin said:
Elon catching up to the intelligent posters on this board. The left overwhelmed us by breaking tons of laws. Time to follow suit and ignore the judiciary.
That is not a good idea. And nobody who is intelligent wants to end the rule of law. Can you even begin to mount a defense of that?
Elon coming to the same realization as what I've been saying is evidence. The problem cannot be dealt with within the current set of laws. The democrats will block any legislation changes. Therefore only option is to ignore the judciary... which has plenty of historical precedents.
None in the U.S.
If the judge is not following the law, impeachbthe judge, but follow the poper process. If the law is flawed, change the law. If Congress won't change the law, vote a decent Congress in. At no point is blowing up the system and anointing a tyrannical President with the power to be above the rule of law an option. Nobody intelligent thinks so.
It's like the insurrection. Nobody thinks it will happen, Nobody really tried very hard, but anyone trying even a little is breaking the law.
Not true. Jackson 1866.
The issue was so different, how sovereign the Cherokees could be in the U.S. led to the Trail of Tears, one of the great mistakes America has ever made.
In the end, the Cherokees do have control over their own land, but not in Georgia. And even after Jackson defied SCOTUS, he issued a proclamation that they did need to be respected, and their rulings followed.
Also, he had an actual agreement on his side, signed by a small number of the Cherokee, so some legal basis. To compare that to Trump ignoring the rule of law, defying the ruling of any court that rules something that hurts his feelings, is not a fair or apt comparison. I get that it is the closest thing, but Jackson would not agree with Trump in this case.
