White privilege?

73,626 Views | 600 Replies | Last: 7 yr ago by Waco1947
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
White Provilege is a thing.
How many people of color are really trained, healthy, educated, smart enough, need child care, need public transportation, need housing, need phones? It's easy to say "Get a job." But the gop cuts off the very programs to get them to work.
Waco1947 ,la
YoakDaddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

White Provilege is a thing.
How many people of color are really trained, healthy, educated, smart enough, need child care, need public transportation, need housing, need phones? It's easy to say "Get a job." But the gop cuts off the very programs to get them to work.

That's one of the problems; reliance on gov't programs. It doesn't take a gov't program to study hard, get good grades, go to church, get a job, etc. It's having the sand to make those choices. Those choices regardless of color are what count....personal responsibility.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

White Provilege is a thing.
How many people of color are really trained, healthy, educated, smart enough, need child care, need public transportation, need housing, need phones? It's easy to say "Get a job." But the gop cuts off the very programs to get them to work.
as a provider of jobs in the local community, childcare is the only legit limitation on that list. Dunno what specifically the GOP did to cut out child care but sounds to me like one person who needs a job can be the child care provider for the other person going to work. Look, created two jobs with zero gov help!

We dont need the govt to solve our problems, we can support our own. Hold night classes at the church for adult education, use the church as a daycare locaction, get church members and friends/coworkers to car pool workers/bus service.
cinque
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gruvin said:

Waco1947 said:

White Provilege is a thing.
How many people of color are really trained, healthy, educated, smart enough, need child care, need public transportation, need housing, need phones? It's easy to say "Get a job." But the gop cuts off the very programs to get them to work.
as a provider of jobs in the local community, childcare is the only legit limitation on that list. Dunno what specifically the GOP did to cut out child care but sounds to me like one person who needs a job can be the child care provider for the other person going to work. Look, created two jobs with zero gov help!

We dont need the govt to solve our problems, we can support our own. Hold night classes at the church for adult education, use the church as a daycare locaction, get church members and friends/coworkers to car pool workers/bus service.
Laudable and very idealistic.
Make Racism Wrong Again
RioRata
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The "War" On Poverty has failed. It's time to return the money to the communities to better serve the public.
57Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bo... said:

... The relevant comparisons are how do blacks from two-parent families do against whites from two-parent families and how blacks from one-parent families do against whites from one-parent families, statistics the speaker leaves out for a reason. ...
One or two parent families does not consider the effect of the community in which they live and the effect of their extended families. Family and friends makes a difference.
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chuckle

Same 3rd teamers demanding the same excuse(s) for their mediocre lives.....

' It's somebody's else's fault '
' I was held back '

Been singing this song for YEARS now. Could have re trained into a top paying occupation in the time they've been whining on this forum.

But that would have required real effort.


In a few hours we will be having dinner again with the ( obviously ) content Japanese couple from Vancouver.

Will ask them if they were 'held back' on their road to becoming multi millionaires.

fadskier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Booray said:

fadskier said:

and yet no one posting here has refuted any of the facts put forth by Shapiro, Dinesh, Denzel, or Jesse Peterson
Here you go.

The first statistic he cites is the one that favors two-parent families, pointing out that blacks from two parent families do better than whites from one-parent families. I'm sure that is true, but it is completely irrelevant to the white privilege question. Simple apples and oranges.

The relevant comparisons are how do blacks from two-parent families do against whites from two-parent families and how blacks from one-parent families do against whites from one-parent families, statistics the speaker leaves out for a reason. If there is a difference apples to apples (hint: there is), race might be a factor that explains that difference.

Overall, his point is make better choices, get better results. That is awesome life advice and everyone needs to take it. But it ignores these two things: (1) you still get different outcomes when people of different color make the same choices and (2) it is easier for whites to make the good choices.

I'm sure you will scream and shout about that second point, but the speaker himself proved it. He says about 20 times that black neighborhoods are under-policed. Meaning a black teen tempted to commit a crime is less likely to be dissuaded by police presence. The entire infrastructure in black communities is less robust than in white communities; the result is people doing things they would not otherwise do.

White privilege can exist even if it is not the most important factor holding back minorities. Any half-wit can cherry-pick statistics, talk real fast and convince like-minded half-wits he is brilliant. That is all that is happening in the video.
Again, you you cite no evidence, just your opinion. Where is the evidence that the choice wouldn't be the same? Isn't your point #2 racist? Are you saying that white people inherently have the ability to make better choice than black people? That sounds racist to me. and why are black communities less policed?
Booray
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fadskier said:

Booray said:

fadskier said:

and yet no one posting here has refuted any of the facts put forth by Shapiro, Dinesh, Denzel, or Jesse Peterson
Here you go.

The first statistic he cites is the one that favors two-parent families, pointing out that blacks from two parent families do better than whites from one-parent families. I'm sure that is true, but it is completely irrelevant to the white privilege question. Simple apples and oranges.

The relevant comparisons are how do blacks from two-parent families do against whites from two-parent families and how blacks from one-parent families do against whites from one-parent families, statistics the speaker leaves out for a reason. If there is a difference apples to apples (hint: there is), race might be a factor that explains that difference.

Overall, his point is make better choices, get better results. That is awesome life advice and everyone needs to take it. But it ignores these two things: (1) you still get different outcomes when people of different color make the same choices and (2) it is easier for whites to make the good choices.

I'm sure you will scream and shout about that second point, but the speaker himself proved it. He says about 20 times that black neighborhoods are under-policed. Meaning a black teen tempted to commit a crime is less likely to be dissuaded by police presence. The entire infrastructure in black communities is less robust than in white communities; the result is people doing things they would not otherwise do.

White privilege can exist even if it is not the most important factor holding back minorities. Any half-wit can cherry-pick statistics, talk real fast and convince like-minded half-wits he is brilliant. That is all that is happening in the video.
Again, you you cite no evidence, just your opinion. Where is the evidence that the choice wouldn't be the same? Isn't your point #2 racist? Are you saying that white people inherently have the ability to make better choice than black people? That sounds racist to me. and why are black communities less policed?


I am saying the exact opposite and anybody with half a brain knows it.

The speaker said black communities are under policed. That is his statistic, not mine. If you have a problem with that, I assume you have similar problems with the stats you are defending.

My point is that being under policed changes the risk-reward ratio for committing a crime. The change in the ratio is color blind. If there were less police in white neighborhoods, there would be more crime there.

Why are black communities under policed? I don't know. What difference does it make?
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YoakDaddy said:

Waco1947 said:

White Provilege is a thing.
How many people of color are really trained, healthy, educated, smart enough, need child care, need public transportation, need housing, need phones? It's easy to say "Get a job." But the gop cuts off the very programs to get them to work.

That's one of the problems;
1)Reliance on gov't programs. (((((YpIt was called the GI Bill. Far got a degree that put me way ahead of the black guy born 1947 but Dad could not receive GI bill
2)It doesn't take a gov't program to study hard, ((((((it takes a decent school and qualified teachers but black kids went to inferior schools
3) it took a stay at home mom and a world book encyclopedia to get good grades, which Dad's job allowed her to do
4) yep true except they were segregated.
To go to church,
5). Sure get a job, I got my first job digging ditches. The foreman said "You'll start tomorrow. I'll fire that Nero's
6). My second job "Sure you can start tomorrow. That crew of Wet____ I'll fire."
etc. It's having the sand to make those choices. Those choices regardless of color are what count....personal responsibility.
Having the Sand? You don't know the real world.
Waco1947 ,la
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canada2017 said:

chuckle

Same 3rd teamers demanding the same excuse(s) for their mediocre lives.....

' It's somebody's else's fault '
' I was held back '. """""""Proof or simply a handy straw man?"""""""""

Been singing this song for YEARS now. Could have re trained into a top paying occupation in the time they've been whining on this forum.

But that would have required real effort.


In a few hours we will be having dinner again with the ( obviously ) content Japanese couple from Vancouver.

Will ask them if they were 'held back' on their road to becoming multi millionaires.


Waco1947 ,la
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canada2017 said:

Wife and I had dinner tonight with a charming Japanese couple who are happily retired in their mid 50's while owning several apartment buildings in Vancouver.

Must have been due to Asian privilege.
Were they "interned" in WW II?
Waco1947 ,la
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Canada2017 said:

Wife and I had dinner tonight with a charming Japanese couple who are happily retired in their mid 50's while owning several apartment buildings in Vancouver.

Must have been due to Asian privilege.
Were they "interned" in WW II?


You missed they were in their "mid 50's"

They missed WWII
fadskier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Booray said:

fadskier said:

Booray said:

fadskier said:

and yet no one posting here has refuted any of the facts put forth by Shapiro, Dinesh, Denzel, or Jesse Peterson
Here you go.

The first statistic he cites is the one that favors two-parent families, pointing out that blacks from two parent families do better than whites from one-parent families. I'm sure that is true, but it is completely irrelevant to the white privilege question. Simple apples and oranges.

The relevant comparisons are how do blacks from two-parent families do against whites from two-parent families and how blacks from one-parent families do against whites from one-parent families, statistics the speaker leaves out for a reason. If there is a difference apples to apples (hint: there is), race might be a factor that explains that difference.

Overall, his point is make better choices, get better results. That is awesome life advice and everyone needs to take it. But it ignores these two things: (1) you still get different outcomes when people of different color make the same choices and (2) it is easier for whites to make the good choices.

I'm sure you will scream and shout about that second point, but the speaker himself proved it. He says about 20 times that black neighborhoods are under-policed. Meaning a black teen tempted to commit a crime is less likely to be dissuaded by police presence. The entire infrastructure in black communities is less robust than in white communities; the result is people doing things they would not otherwise do.

White privilege can exist even if it is not the most important factor holding back minorities. Any half-wit can cherry-pick statistics, talk real fast and convince like-minded half-wits he is brilliant. That is all that is happening in the video.
Again, you you cite no evidence, just your opinion. Where is the evidence that the choice wouldn't be the same? Isn't your point #2 racist? Are you saying that white people inherently have the ability to make better choice than black people? That sounds racist to me. and why are black communities less policed?


I am saying the exact opposite and anybody with half a brain knows it.

The speaker said black communities are under policed. That is his statistic, not mine. If you have a problem with that, I assume you have similar problems with the stats you are defending.

My point is that being under policed changes the risk-reward ratio for committing a crime. The change in the ratio is color blind. If there were less police in white neighborhoods, there would be more crime there.

Why are black communities under policed? I don't know. What difference does it make?
Yes I know what the speaker said...he also said why. And to your last question, apparently, it makes a big difference.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump is the first "white president." He was able to run on his whiteness and racism and win. No other gop candidate (to their credit) would stoop that low but Trump did.
"For Trump, it almost seems that the fact of Obama, the fact of a black president, insulted him personally. The insult intensified when Obama and Seth Meyers publicly humiliated him at the White House Correspondents' Dinner in 2011. But the bloody heirloom ensures the last laugh. Replacing Obama is not enoughTrump has made the negation of Obama's legacy the foundation of his own. And this too is whiteness. "Race is an idea, not a fact," the historian Nell Irvin Painter has written, and essential to the construct of a "white race" is the idea of not being a ******. Before Barack Obama, ******s could be manufactured out of Sister Souljahs, Willie Hortons, and Dusky Sallys. But Donald Trump arrived in the wake of something more potentan entire ****** presidency with ****** health care, ****** climate accords, and ****** justice reform, all of which could be targeted for destruction or redemption, thus reifying the idea of being white. Trump truly is something newthe first president whose entire political existence hinges on the fact of a black president. And so it will not suffice to say that Trump is a white man like all the others who rose to become president. He must be called by his rightful honorificAmerica's first white president.


THE SCOPE OF TRUMP'S commitment to whiteness is matched only by the depth of popular disbelief in the power of whiteness. We are now being told that support for Trump's "Muslim ban," his scapegoating of immigrants, his defenses of police brutality are somehow the natural outgrowth of the cultural and economic gap between Lena Dunham's America and Jeff Foxworthy's. The collective verdict holds that the Democratic Party lost its way when it abandoned everyday economic issues like job creation for the softer fare of social justice. The indictment continues: To their neoliberal economics, Democrats and liberals have married a condescending elitist affect that sneers at blue-collar culture and mocks the white man as history's greatest monster and prime-time television's biggest doofus. In this rendition, Donald Trump is not the product of white supremacy so much as the product of a backlash against contempt for white working-class people." Ya Neshesi Coates
Waco1947 ,la
fadskier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Trump is the first "white president." He was able to run on his whiteness and racism and win. No other gop candidate (to their credit) would stoop that low but Trump did.
"For Trump, it almost seems that the fact of Obama, the fact of a black president, insulted him personally. The insult intensified when Obama and Seth Meyers publicly humiliated him at the White House Correspondents' Dinner in 2011. But the bloody heirloom ensures the last laugh. Replacing Obama is not enoughTrump has made the negation of Obama's legacy the foundation of his own. And this too is whiteness. "Race is an idea, not a fact," the historian Nell Irvin Painter has written, and essential to the construct of a "white race" is the idea of not being a ******. Before Barack Obama, ******s could be manufactured out of Sister Souljahs, Willie Hortons, and Dusky Sallys. But Donald Trump arrived in the wake of something more potentan entire ****** presidency with ****** health care, ****** climate accords, and ****** justice reform, all of which could be targeted for destruction or redemption, thus reifying the idea of being white. Trump truly is something newthe first president whose entire political existence hinges on the fact of a black president. And so it will not suffice to say that Trump is a white man like all the others who rose to become president. He must be called by his rightful honorificAmerica's first white president.


THE SCOPE OF TRUMP'S commitment to whiteness is matched only by the depth of popular disbelief in the power of whiteness. We are now being told that support for Trump's "Muslim ban," his scapegoating of immigrants, his defenses of police brutality are somehow the natural outgrowth of the cultural and economic gap between Lena Dunham's America and Jeff Foxworthy's. The collective verdict holds that the Democratic Party lost its way when it abandoned everyday economic issues like job creation for the softer fare of social justice. The indictment continues: To their neoliberal economics, Democrats and liberals have married a condescending elitist affect that sneers at blue-collar culture and mocks the white man as history's greatest monster and prime-time television's biggest doofus. In this rendition, Donald Trump is not the product of white supremacy so much as the product of a backlash against contempt for white working-class people." Ya Neshesi Coates
Yes we all know you're opinion...Trump is racist, white people are racist, abortion should be blessed and the Bible only means what YOU say it means. We got it. You're wrong on all accounts, but keep babbling.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Erased I was wrong.
Waco1947 ,la
fadskier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

No you don't know "my opinion." You have made no effort to understand it.
"You hate Trump" is another stupid straw man. A figment if your imagination. I hate his stupid policies and thought - chief among them racism and separation of children.
I do know your opinion as you've stated it over and over again. "You hate Trump" was not included in my statements. You really need to work on how you quote people.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fadskier, You were right. My apologies
You said "Yes we all know you're opinion...Trump is racist, white people are racist, abortion should be blessed and the Bible only means what YOU say it means. We got it. You're wrong on all accounts, but keep babbling."
Trump is a racist. White people are not racist. But they need to examine their souls if they vote for a racist like Trump. The Bible means what it says but one has to be very clear about what is says.
I have said abortion should be blessed - You damn liar. Yeah I cussed you because you keep repeating a lie and I need to get your attention.
The Bible says what it means but God gave us a mind to interpret. Jesus said, "cut off your hand if it offends you." I think that needs interpretation; don't you?
My 5: 30 "And if your right hand causes you to stumble, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to go into hell."
Waco1947 ,la
fadskier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Fadskier, You were right. My apologies
You said "Yes we all know you're opinion...Trump is racist, white people are racist, abortion should be blessed and the Bible only means what YOU say it means. We got it. You're wrong on all accounts, but keep babbling."
Trump is a racist. White people are not racist. But they need to examine their souls if they vote for a racist like Trump. The Bible means what it says but one has to be very clear about what is says.
I have said abortion should be blessed - You damn liar. Yeah I cussed you because you keep repeating a lie and I need to get your attention.
The Bible says what it means but God gave us a mind to interpret. Jesus said, "cut off your hand if it offends you." I think that needs interpretation; don't you?
My 5: 30 "And if your right hand causes you to stumble, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to go into hell."
Where is your evidence that a Trump is racist? You condone, support abortion. Not a lie. Your interpretation of the Bible would include anything that gives you ease about your beliefs.
YoakDaddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

YoakDaddy said:

Waco1947 said:

White Provilege is a thing.
How many people of color are really trained, healthy, educated, smart enough, need child care, need public transportation, need housing, need phones? It's easy to say "Get a job." But the gop cuts off the very programs to get them to work.

That's one of the problems;
1)Reliance on gov't programs. (((((YpIt was called the GI Bill. Far got a degree that put me way ahead of the black guy born 1947 but Dad could not receive GI bill
2)It doesn't take a gov't program to study hard, ((((((it takes a decent school and qualified teachers but black kids went to inferior schools
3) it took a stay at home mom and a world book encyclopedia to get good grades, which Dad's job allowed her to do
4) yep true except they were segregated.
To go to church,
5). Sure get a job, I got my first job digging ditches. The foreman said "You'll start tomorrow. I'll fire that Nero's
6). My second job "Sure you can start tomorrow. That crew of Wet____ I'll fire."
etc. It's having the sand to make those choices. Those choices regardless of color are what count....personal responsibility.
Having the Sand? You don't know the real world.

I don't know the real world? Any time you wanna go to a drilling rig with me in Reeves County sweetheart, you're welcome to. They'll see thru your weak *** within 5 steps from the truck. You're not even a joke; you're sad. No excuses. Pull yourself up.
JusHappy2BeHere
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YoakDaddy said:

Waco1947 said:

White Provilege is a thing.
How many people of color are really trained, healthy, educated, smart enough, need child care, need public transportation, need housing, need phones? It's easy to say "Get a job." But the gop cuts off the very programs to get them to work.

That's one of the problems; reliance on gov't programs. It doesn't take a gov't program to study hard, get good grades, go to church, get a job, etc. It's having the sand to make those choices. Those choices regardless of color are what count....personal responsibility.
"When I despair, I remember that all through history the ways of truth and love have always won. There have been tyrants, and murderers, and for a time they can seem invincible, but in the end they always fall. Think of it--always."

Mahatma Gandhi
RioRata
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JusHappy2BeHere said:

YoakDaddy said:

Waco1947 said:

White Provilege is a thing.
How many people of color are really trained, healthy, educated, smart enough, need child care, need public transportation, need housing, need phones? It's easy to say "Get a job." But the gop cuts off the very programs to get them to work.

That's one of the problems; reliance on gov't programs. It doesn't take a gov't program to study hard, get good grades, go to church, get a job, etc. It's having the sand to make those choices. Those choices regardless of color are what count....personal responsibility.


That white boy RG3 sure has sure has suffered.



Your cracker arse can have it for 2.6
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RioRata said:

JusHappy2BeHere said:

YoakDaddy said:

Waco1947 said:

White Provilege is a thing.
How many people of color are really trained, healthy, educated, smart enough, need child care, need public transportation, need housing, need phones? It's easy to say "Get a job." But the gop cuts off the very programs to get them to work.

That's one of the problems; reliance on gov't programs. It doesn't take a gov't program to study hard, get good grades, go to church, get a job, etc. It's having the sand to make those choices. Those choices regardless of color are what count....personal responsibility.


That white boy RG3 sure has sure has suffered.



Your cracker arse can have it for 2.6

Anybody know what he means?
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
syme
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It has more to do with white admiration across the globe/insecurity in people of color. Google "white face jobs" in China and tell me where that comes from.
bearassnekkid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

RioRata said:

JusHappy2BeHere said:

YoakDaddy said:

Waco1947 said:

White Provilege is a thing.
How many people of color are really trained, healthy, educated, smart enough, need child care, need public transportation, need housing, need phones? It's easy to say "Get a job." But the gop cuts off the very programs to get them to work.

That's one of the problems; reliance on gov't programs. It doesn't take a gov't program to study hard, get good grades, go to church, get a job, etc. It's having the sand to make those choices. Those choices regardless of color are what count....personal responsibility.


That white boy RG3 sure has sure has suffered.



Your cracker arse can have it for 2.6

Anybody know what he means?
That's RG3's lakehouse for sale. Asking price 2.6M. I think the insinuation was that black people can do just fine in America, but I don't want to make his point for him. Just clarifying the post since you asked.
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearassnekkid said:

quash said:

RioRata said:

JusHappy2BeHere said:

YoakDaddy said:

Waco1947 said:

White Provilege is a thing.
How many people of color are really trained, healthy, educated, smart enough, need child care, need public transportation, need housing, need phones? It's easy to say "Get a job." But the gop cuts off the very programs to get them to work.

That's one of the problems; reliance on gov't programs. It doesn't take a gov't program to study hard, get good grades, go to church, get a job, etc. It's having the sand to make those choices. Those choices regardless of color are what count....personal responsibility.


That white boy RG3 sure has sure has suffered.



Your cracker arse can have it for 2.6

Anybody know what he means?
That's RG3's lakehouse for sale. Asking price 2.6M. I think the insinuation was that black people can do just fine in America, but I don't want to make his point for him. Just clarifying the post since you asked.


Black people do just fine when they assimilate. They have problems progressing when they won't assimilate

When they rigidly stay only amongst themselves and appear prejudiced against whites then they end up like the group they hang with that's often stuck forever in poverty. Don't stick with losers complaining about what they don't have and making excuses for everything

You are where your top 5 friends are at in life! Stick with positive winners no matter what's your skin tint
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearassnekkid said:

quash said:

RioRata said:

JusHappy2BeHere said:

YoakDaddy said:

Waco1947 said:

White Provilege is a thing.
How many people of color are really trained, healthy, educated, smart enough, need child care, need public transportation, need housing, need phones? It's easy to say "Get a job." But the gop cuts off the very programs to get them to work.

That's one of the problems; reliance on gov't programs. It doesn't take a gov't program to study hard, get good grades, go to church, get a job, etc. It's having the sand to make those choices. Those choices regardless of color are what count....personal responsibility.


That white boy RG3 sure has sure has suffered.



Your cracker arse can have it for 2.6

Anybody know what he means?
That's RG3's lakehouse for sale. Asking price 2.6M. I think the insinuation was that black people can do just fine in America, but I don't want to make his point for him. Just clarifying the post since you asked.

Thanks, I got that part. I don't understand calling a black man a "white boy".
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Golem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PRAGER: 'White Privilege': Part II in a Series of Widely Held Beliefs That Are Either Untrue or Meaningless

ByDENNIS PRAGER
January 6, 2018
A pillar of contemporary leftism is the notion of "white privilege." Given that a generation of high school and college students are being taught that a great number of "unearned privileges" accrue to white Americans -- the charge of white privilege demands rational inquiry.

The assertion turns out to be largely meaningless. And more significantly, it does great harm to blacks.

First, no reasonable person can argue that white privilege applies to the great majority of whites, let alone to all whites. There are simply too many variables other than race that determine individual success in America.

And if it were true, why would whites commit suicide at twice the rate of blacks (and at a higher rate than any other race in America except American Indians)? According to the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, white men, whom the left argue are the most privileged group of all in America, commit 7 of every 10 suicides in America -- even though only 3 of 10 Americans are white males.

Whatever reason one gives for the white suicide rate, it is indisputable that, at the very least, considerably more whites than blacks consider life not worth living. To argue that all these whites were oblivious to all the unique privileges they had is to stretch the definition of "privilege" beyond credulity.

Second, there are a host of privileges that dwarf "white privilege."

A huge one is "two-parent privilege." If you are raised by a father and mother, you enter adulthood with more privileges than anyone else in American society, irrespective of race, ethnicity or sex. That's why the poverty rate among two-parent black families is only 7 percent. Compare that to a 22 percent poverty rate among whites in single-parent homes. Obviously, the two-parent home is the decisive privilege.

Another "privilege," if one wants to use that term, that dwarfs "white privilege" is "Asian privilege." Asian-Americans do better than white Americans in school, on IQ tests, on credit scores and on other positive parameters. In fact, according to recent data from the Federal Reserve, Asians are about to surpass whites as the wealthiest group of Americans. Will the left soon complain about Asian privilege?

And how about "gentile privilege?" For most of American history it was a lot easier being a Christian than being a Jew in America. Yet, I do not know a Jew -- myself included -- who doesn't believe that to be a Jew in America has always been an unbelievable stroke of good fortune. It is not surprising that an American Jew, Irving Berlin, wrote "God Bless America."

There are even times when there is "minority privilege" in America today. Every high school student knows that given similar scholastic and extracurricular records, one's chances of being accepted into a prestigious college are considerably greater if one is a member of a minority, most especially the black minority.

And the biggest privilege of all is "American privilege." Unless you or your family make some big mistakes, the greatest privilege of all is to be an American. That's why much of the world wants to live in America.

So, then why all this left-wing talk about white privilege?

The major reason is in order to portray blacks as victims. This achieves two huge goals for the left, one political, the other philosophical.

The political goal is to ensure that blacks continue to view America as racist. The left knows that the only way to retain political power in America is to perpetuate the belief among black Americans that their primary problem is white racism. Only then will blacks continue to regard the left and the Democrats as indispensable.

The philosophical reason is that the left denies -- as it has since Marx -- the primacy of moral and cultural values in determining the fate of the individual and of society. In the left's view, it is not poor values or a lack of moral self-control that causes crime, but poverty and, in the case of black criminals, racism. Therefore, the disproportionate amount of violent crime committed by black males is not attributable to the moral failure of the black criminal or to the likelihood of his not having been raised by a father but to an external factor over which he has little or no power -- white racism.

White privilege is another left-wing attempt, and a successful one, to keep America from focusing on that which will truly help black America -- a resurrection of the black family, for example -- and instead to focus on an external problem: white privilege.

In doing so, the left has become the only real enemy the black has in America today.


https://www.dailywire.com/news/25464/prager-white-privilege-part-ii-series-widely-held-dennis-prager
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GolemIII said:

PRAGER: 'White Privilege': Part II in a Series of Widely Held Beliefs That Are Either Untrue or Meaningless

ByDENNIS PRAGER
January 6, 2018
A pillar of contemporary leftism is the notion of "white privilege." Given that a generation of high school and college students are being taught that a great number of "unearned privileges" accrue to white Americans -- the charge of white privilege demands rational inquiry.

The assertion turns out to be largely meaningless. And more significantly, it does great harm to blacks.

First, no reasonable person can argue that white privilege applies to the great majority of whites, let alone to all whites. There are simply too many variables other than race that determine individual success in America.

And if it were true, why would whites commit suicide at twice the rate of blacks (and at a higher rate than any other race in America except American Indians)? According to the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, white men, whom the left argue are the most privileged group of all in America, commit 7 of every 10 suicides in America -- even though only 3 of 10 Americans are white males.

Whatever reason one gives for the white suicide rate, it is indisputable that, at the very least, considerably more whites than blacks consider life not worth living. To argue that all these whites were oblivious to all the unique privileges they had is to stretch the definition of "privilege" beyond credulity.

Second, there are a host of privileges that dwarf "white privilege."

A huge one is "two-parent privilege." If you are raised by a father and mother, you enter adulthood with more privileges than anyone else in American society, irrespective of race, ethnicity or sex. That's why the poverty rate among two-parent black families is only 7 percent. Compare that to a 22 percent poverty rate among whites in single-parent homes. Obviously, the two-parent home is the decisive privilege.

Another "privilege," if one wants to use that term, that dwarfs "white privilege" is "Asian privilege." Asian-Americans do better than white Americans in school, on IQ tests, on credit scores and on other positive parameters. In fact, according to recent data from the Federal Reserve, Asians are about to surpass whites as the wealthiest group of Americans. Will the left soon complain about Asian privilege?

And how about "gentile privilege?" For most of American history it was a lot easier being a Christian than being a Jew in America. Yet, I do not know a Jew -- myself included -- who doesn't believe that to be a Jew in America has always been an unbelievable stroke of good fortune. It is not surprising that an American Jew, Irving Berlin, wrote "God Bless America."

There are even times when there is "minority privilege" in America today. Every high school student knows that given similar scholastic and extracurricular records, one's chances of being accepted into a prestigious college are considerably greater if one is a member of a minority, most especially the black minority.

And the biggest privilege of all is "American privilege." Unless you or your family make some big mistakes, the greatest privilege of all is to be an American. That's why much of the world wants to live in America.

So, then why all this left-wing talk about white privilege?

The major reason is in order to portray blacks as victims. This achieves two huge goals for the left, one political, the other philosophical.

The political goal is to ensure that blacks continue to view America as racist. The left knows that the only way to retain political power in America is to perpetuate the belief among black Americans that their primary problem is white racism. Only then will blacks continue to regard the left and the Democrats as indispensable.

The philosophical reason is that the left denies -- as it has since Marx -- the primacy of moral and cultural values in determining the fate of the individual and of society. In the left's view, it is not poor values or a lack of moral self-control that causes crime, but poverty and, in the case of black criminals, racism. Therefore, the disproportionate amount of violent crime committed by black males is not attributable to the moral failure of the black criminal or to the likelihood of his not having been raised by a father but to an external factor over which he has little or no power -- white racism.

White privilege is another left-wing attempt, and a successful one, to keep America from focusing on that which will truly help black America -- a resurrection of the black family, for example -- and instead to focus on an external problem: white privilege.

In doing so, the left has become the only real enemy the black has in America today.


https://www.dailywire.com/news/25464/prager-white-privilege-part-ii-series-widely-held-dennis-prager

Does Prager not get it or does he intentionally misrepresent what white privilege is?
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
YoakDaddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JusHappy2BeHere said:

YoakDaddy said:

Waco1947 said:

White Provilege is a thing.
How many people of color are really trained, healthy, educated, smart enough, need child care, need public transportation, need housing, need phones? It's easy to say "Get a job." But the gop cuts off the very programs to get them to work.

That's one of the problems; reliance on gov't programs. It doesn't take a gov't program to study hard, get good grades, go to church, get a job, etc. It's having the sand to make those choices. Those choices regardless of color are what count....personal responsibility.


Nice if it were true...nope. The house I grew up in was barely a 1,400 sq.ft., pier and beam, ranch style built in 1950. No central heat or central air...didn't get A/C window units until about 1985 and heaters were electric. Keep tryin tho.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

Fadskier, You were right. My apologies
You said "Yes we all know you're opinion...Trump is racist, white people are racist, abortion should be blessed and the Bible only means what YOU say it means. We got it. You're wrong on all accounts, but keep babbling."
Trump is a racist. White people are not racist. But they need to examine their souls if they vote for a racist like Trump. The Bible means what it says but one has to be very clear about what is says.
I have said abortion should be blessed - You damn liar. Yeah I cussed you because you keep repeating a lie and I need to get your attention.
The Bible says what it means but God gave us a mind to interpret. Jesus said, "cut off your hand if it offends you." I think that needs interpretation; don't you?
My 5: 30 "And if your right hand causes you to stumble, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to go into hell."
Where is your evidence that a Trump is racist? You condone, support abortion. Not a lie. Your interpretation of the Bible would include anything that gives you ease about your beliefs.
evidence? For the 1,000th Time Birtherism.
Waco1947 ,la
RioRata
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

Fadskier, You were right. My apologies
You said "Yes we all know you're opinion...Trump is racist, white people are racist, abortion should be blessed and the Bible only means what YOU say it means. We got it. You're wrong on all accounts, but keep babbling."
Trump is a racist. White people are not racist. But they need to examine their souls if they vote for a racist like Trump. The Bible means what it says but one has to be very clear about what is says.
I have said abortion should be blessed - You damn liar. Yeah I cussed you because you keep repeating a lie and I need to get your attention.
The Bible says what it means but God gave us a mind to interpret. Jesus said, "cut off your hand if it offends you." I think that needs interpretation; don't you?
My 5: 30 "And if your right hand causes you to stumble, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to go into hell."
Where is your evidence that a Trump is racist? You condone, support abortion. Not a lie. Your interpretation of the Bible would include anything that gives you ease about your beliefs.
evidence? For the 1,000th Time Birtherism.

You're saying Hillary is racist?
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you believe in white privilege, then what are your solutions for it and what are you doing to keep yourself from being a hypocrite?

White tax?

Head start (money) given to everyone who isn't white?

Limits on freedoms towards white people?

If being white is the easy difficulty on the game of life, what are you doing to increase your own difficulty?
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." ~ John Adams
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RioRata said:

Waco1947 said:

fadskier said:

Waco1947 said:

Fadskier, You were right. My apologies
You said "Yes we all know you're opinion...Trump is racist, white people are racist, abortion should be blessed and the Bible only means what YOU say it means. We got it. You're wrong on all accounts, but keep babbling."
Trump is a racist. White people are not racist. But they need to examine their souls if they vote for a racist like Trump. The Bible means what it says but one has to be very clear about what is says.
I have said abortion should be blessed - You damn liar. Yeah I cussed you because you keep repeating a lie and I need to get your attention.
The Bible says what it means but God gave us a mind to interpret. Jesus said, "cut off your hand if it offends you." I think that needs interpretation; don't you?
My 5: 30 "And if your right hand causes you to stumble, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to go into hell."
Where is your evidence that a Trump is racist? You condone, support abortion. Not a lie. Your interpretation of the Bible would include anything that gives you ease about your beliefs.
evidence? For the 1,000th Time Birtherism.

You're saying Hillary is racist?
Nope just another straw woman on your part and you know it. It's sad you hold on to a silly, silly lie.
P. S. Blacks held DT responsible not HRC. I'm going with their analysis not your lily white lie.
Waco1947 ,la
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.