"Mostly peaceful" protester/tourist sentenced to 5 years for visiting the Capitol

24,534 Views | 443 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Oldbear83
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "You are referring to my oldbear impression."

You don't have an 'oldbear impression'

What you have is a 'paranoid and frankly pathetic attempt to crap in print'


Oso can add that to his stockpile if he has enough cloud storage.

Oso does not bother with context when he plays that game.

But as you say, maybe he just ran out of storage.


Are you kidding me? It's his knack for perfectly pairing the quote with the context that makes it all the more hilarious. You've given him a supply sufficient for any context.

You would say he has accurate context, seeing that you share his opinion.

An objective reader would disagree.

In any case, I wonder if you are admitting that using my words, even out of context as they are, demonstrates that you have no effective response of your own.

And the choice to use my words implies that my own posts are, like it or not, effective.

That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "You are referring to my oldbear impression."

You don't have an 'oldbear impression'

What you have is a 'paranoid and frankly pathetic attempt to crap in print'


Oso can add that to his stockpile if he has enough cloud storage.

Oso has pages & there is no context, just blather
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "You are referring to my oldbear impression."

You don't have an 'oldbear impression'

What you have is a 'paranoid and frankly pathetic attempt to crap in print'


Oso can add that to his stockpile if he has enough cloud storage.

Oso does not bother with context when he plays that game.

But as you say, maybe he just ran out of storage.


Are you kidding me? It's his knack for perfectly pairing the quote with the context that makes it all the more hilarious. You've given him a supply sufficient for any context.

You would say he has accurate context, seeing that you share his opinion.

An objective reader would disagree.

In any case, I wonder if you are admitting that using my words, even out of context as they are, demonstrates that you have no effective response of your own.

And the choice to use my words implies that my own posts are, like it or not, effective.
"Grow up. Read what I already wrote. Try to be an adult instead of this board's Pee Wee Herman."
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "You are referring to my oldbear impression."

You don't have an 'oldbear impression'

What you have is a 'paranoid and frankly pathetic attempt to crap in print'


Oso can add that to his stockpile if he has enough cloud storage.

Oso does not bother with context when he plays that game.

But as you say, maybe he just ran out of storage.


Are you kidding me? It's his knack for perfectly pairing the quote with the context that makes it all the more hilarious. You've given him a supply sufficient for any context.

You would say he has accurate context, seeing that you share his opinion.

An objective reader would disagree.

In any case, I wonder if you are admitting that using my words, even out of context as they are, demonstrates that you have no effective response of your own.

And the choice to use my words implies that my own posts are, like it or not, effective.
"Grow up. Read what I already wrote. Try to be an adult instead of this board's Pee Wee Herman."
Thanks. I always enjoy winning.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "You are referring to my oldbear impression."

You don't have an 'oldbear impression'

What you have is a 'paranoid and frankly pathetic attempt to crap in print'


Oso can add that to his stockpile if he has enough cloud storage.

Oso does not bother with context when he plays that game.

But as you say, maybe he just ran out of storage.


Are you kidding me? It's his knack for perfectly pairing the quote with the context that makes it all the more hilarious. You've given him a supply sufficient for any context.

You would say he has accurate context, seeing that you share his opinion.

An objective reader would disagree.

In any case, I wonder if you are admitting that using my words, even out of context as they are, demonstrates that you have no effective response of your own.

And the choice to use my words implies that my own posts are, like it or not, effective.
"Grow up. Read what I already wrote. Try to be an adult instead of this board's Pee Wee Herman."
Thanks. I always enjoy winning.
"Holy cow, I thought you were pathetic, but now, now you're just pitiful."
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "You are referring to my oldbear impression."

You don't have an 'oldbear impression'

What you have is a 'paranoid and frankly pathetic attempt to crap in print'


Oso can add that to his stockpile if he has enough cloud storage.

Oso does not bother with context when he plays that game.

But as you say, maybe he just ran out of storage.


Are you kidding me? It's his knack for perfectly pairing the quote with the context that makes it all the more hilarious. You've given him a supply sufficient for any context.

You would say he has accurate context, seeing that you share his opinion.

An objective reader would disagree.

In any case, I wonder if you are admitting that using my words, even out of context as they are, demonstrates that you have no effective response of your own.

And the choice to use my words implies that my own posts are, like it or not, effective.
"Grow up. Read what I already wrote. Try to be an adult instead of this board's Pee Wee Herman."
Thanks. I always enjoy winning.
"Holy cow, I thought you were pathetic, but now, now you're just pitiful."
Another out-of-context use of my words. Thanks, you are finally admitting my point, however tacitly.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "You are referring to my oldbear impression."

You don't have an 'oldbear impression'

What you have is a 'paranoid and frankly pathetic attempt to crap in print'


Oso can add that to his stockpile if he has enough cloud storage.

Oso does not bother with context when he plays that game.

But as you say, maybe he just ran out of storage.


Are you kidding me? It's his knack for perfectly pairing the quote with the context that makes it all the more hilarious. You've given him a supply sufficient for any context.

You would say he has accurate context, seeing that you share his opinion.

An objective reader would disagree.

In any case, I wonder if you are admitting that using my words, even out of context as they are, demonstrates that you have no effective response of your own.

And the choice to use my words implies that my own posts are, like it or not, effective.
"Grow up. Read what I already wrote. Try to be an adult instead of this board's Pee Wee Herman."
Thanks. I always enjoy winning.
"Holy cow, I thought you were pathetic, but now, now you're just pitiful."
Another out-of-context use of my words. Thanks, you are finally admitting my point, however tacitly.
"Self-serving excuses from Old "Brownshirt" Bear. What a fall from the former Oldbear."
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "You are referring to my oldbear impression."

You don't have an 'oldbear impression'

What you have is a 'paranoid and frankly pathetic attempt to crap in print'


Oso can add that to his stockpile if he has enough cloud storage.

Oso does not bother with context when he plays that game.

But as you say, maybe he just ran out of storage.


Are you kidding me? It's his knack for perfectly pairing the quote with the context that makes it all the more hilarious. You've given him a supply sufficient for any context.

You would say he has accurate context, seeing that you share his opinion.

An objective reader would disagree.

In any case, I wonder if you are admitting that using my words, even out of context as they are, demonstrates that you have no effective response of your own.

And the choice to use my words implies that my own posts are, like it or not, effective.
"Grow up. Read what I already wrote. Try to be an adult instead of this board's Pee Wee Herman."
Thanks. I always enjoy winning.
"Holy cow, I thought you were pathetic, but now, now you're just pitiful."
Another out-of-context use of my words. Thanks, you are finally admitting my point, however tacitly.
"Self-serving excuses from Old "Brownshirt" Bear. What a fall from the former Oldbear."
Confusing me with Fascist Sam? Now you're bumbling, Oso!
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "You are referring to my oldbear impression."

You don't have an 'oldbear impression'

What you have is a 'paranoid and frankly pathetic attempt to crap in print'


Oso can add that to his stockpile if he has enough cloud storage.

Oso does not bother with context when he plays that game.

But as you say, maybe he just ran out of storage.


Are you kidding me? It's his knack for perfectly pairing the quote with the context that makes it all the more hilarious. You've given him a supply sufficient for any context.

You would say he has accurate context, seeing that you share his opinion.

An objective reader would disagree.

In any case, I wonder if you are admitting that using my words, even out of context as they are, demonstrates that you have no effective response of your own.

And the choice to use my words implies that my own posts are, like it or not, effective.
"Grow up. Read what I already wrote. Try to be an adult instead of this board's Pee Wee Herman."
Thanks. I always enjoy winning.
"Holy cow, I thought you were pathetic, but now, now you're just pitiful."
Another out-of-context use of my words. Thanks, you are finally admitting my point, however tacitly.
"Self-serving excuses from Old "Brownshirt" Bear. What a fall from the former Oldbear."
Confusing me with Fascist Sam? Now you're bumbling, Oso!
"While I know you fancy yourself as some sort of master debater, you may want to take a pass on trying to respond with something pithy."
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?

The matches. They're so matchy.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "You are referring to my oldbear impression."

You don't have an 'oldbear impression'

What you have is a 'paranoid and frankly pathetic attempt to crap in print'


Oso can add that to his stockpile if he has enough cloud storage.

Oso does not bother with context when he plays that game.

But as you say, maybe he just ran out of storage.


Are you kidding me? It's his knack for perfectly pairing the quote with the context that makes it all the more hilarious. You've given him a supply sufficient for any context.

You would say he has accurate context, seeing that you share his opinion.

An objective reader would disagree.

In any case, I wonder if you are admitting that using my words, even out of context as they are, demonstrates that you have no effective response of your own.

And the choice to use my words implies that my own posts are, like it or not, effective.
"Grow up. Read what I already wrote. Try to be an adult instead of this board's Pee Wee Herman."
Thanks. I always enjoy winning.
"Holy cow, I thought you were pathetic, but now, now you're just pitiful."
Another out-of-context use of my words. Thanks, you are finally admitting my point, however tacitly.
"Self-serving excuses from Old "Brownshirt" Bear. What a fall from the former Oldbear."
Confusing me with Fascist Sam? Now you're bumbling, Oso!
"While I know you fancy yourself as some sort of master debater, you may want to take a pass on trying to respond with something pithy."

Still nothing of your own?
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "You are referring to my oldbear impression."

You don't have an 'oldbear impression'

What you have is a 'paranoid and frankly pathetic attempt to crap in print'


Oso can add that to his stockpile if he has enough cloud storage.

Oso does not bother with context when he plays that game.

But as you say, maybe he just ran out of storage.


Are you kidding me? It's his knack for perfectly pairing the quote with the context that makes it all the more hilarious. You've given him a supply sufficient for any context.

You would say he has accurate context, seeing that you share his opinion.

An objective reader would disagree.

In any case, I wonder if you are admitting that using my words, even out of context as they are, demonstrates that you have no effective response of your own.

And the choice to use my words implies that my own posts are, like it or not, effective.
"Grow up. Read what I already wrote. Try to be an adult instead of this board's Pee Wee Herman."
Thanks. I always enjoy winning.
"Holy cow, I thought you were pathetic, but now, now you're just pitiful."
Another out-of-context use of my words. Thanks, you are finally admitting my point, however tacitly.
"Self-serving excuses from Old "Brownshirt" Bear. What a fall from the former Oldbear."
Confusing me with Fascist Sam? Now you're bumbling, Oso!
"While I know you fancy yourself as some sort of master debater, you may want to take a pass on trying to respond with something pithy."

Still nothing of your own?
"You keep swinging at pitches not even there."
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "You are referring to my oldbear impression."

You don't have an 'oldbear impression'

What you have is a 'paranoid and frankly pathetic attempt to crap in print'


Oso can add that to his stockpile if he has enough cloud storage.

Oso does not bother with context when he plays that game.

But as you say, maybe he just ran out of storage.


Are you kidding me? It's his knack for perfectly pairing the quote with the context that makes it all the more hilarious. You've given him a supply sufficient for any context.

You would say he has accurate context, seeing that you share his opinion.

An objective reader would disagree.

In any case, I wonder if you are admitting that using my words, even out of context as they are, demonstrates that you have no effective response of your own.

And the choice to use my words implies that my own posts are, like it or not, effective.
"Grow up. Read what I already wrote. Try to be an adult instead of this board's Pee Wee Herman."
Thanks. I always enjoy winning.
"Holy cow, I thought you were pathetic, but now, now you're just pitiful."
Another out-of-context use of my words. Thanks, you are finally admitting my point, however tacitly.
"Self-serving excuses from Old "Brownshirt" Bear. What a fall from the former Oldbear."
Confusing me with Fascist Sam? Now you're bumbling, Oso!
"While I know you fancy yourself as some sort of master debater, you may want to take a pass on trying to respond with something pithy."

Still nothing of your own?
"You keep swinging at pitches not even there."
Bold move, in style terms but like everything else, an empty vessel.

As you once said Oso, I know you can do better.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "You are referring to my oldbear impression."

You don't have an 'oldbear impression'

What you have is a 'paranoid and frankly pathetic attempt to crap in print'


Oso can add that to his stockpile if he has enough cloud storage.

Oso does not bother with context when he plays that game.

But as you say, maybe he just ran out of storage.


Are you kidding me? It's his knack for perfectly pairing the quote with the context that makes it all the more hilarious. You've given him a supply sufficient for any context.

You would say he has accurate context, seeing that you share his opinion.

An objective reader would disagree.

In any case, I wonder if you are admitting that using my words, even out of context as they are, demonstrates that you have no effective response of your own.

And the choice to use my words implies that my own posts are, like it or not, effective.
"Grow up. Read what I already wrote. Try to be an adult instead of this board's Pee Wee Herman."
Thanks. I always enjoy winning.
"Holy cow, I thought you were pathetic, but now, now you're just pitiful."
Another out-of-context use of my words. Thanks, you are finally admitting my point, however tacitly.
"Self-serving excuses from Old "Brownshirt" Bear. What a fall from the former Oldbear."
Confusing me with Fascist Sam? Now you're bumbling, Oso!
"While I know you fancy yourself as some sort of master debater, you may want to take a pass on trying to respond with something pithy."

Still nothing of your own?
"You keep swinging at pitches not even there."
Bold move, in style terms but like everything else, an empty vessel.

As you once said Oso, I know you can do better.
"Given your known bias, no surprise but hardly evidence of actual candor or efforts to be objective."
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "You are referring to my oldbear impression."

You don't have an 'oldbear impression'

What you have is a 'paranoid and frankly pathetic attempt to crap in print'


Oso can add that to his stockpile if he has enough cloud storage.

Oso does not bother with context when he plays that game.

But as you say, maybe he just ran out of storage.


Are you kidding me? It's his knack for perfectly pairing the quote with the context that makes it all the more hilarious. You've given him a supply sufficient for any context.

You would say he has accurate context, seeing that you share his opinion.

An objective reader would disagree.

In any case, I wonder if you are admitting that using my words, even out of context as they are, demonstrates that you have no effective response of your own.

And the choice to use my words implies that my own posts are, like it or not, effective.
"Grow up. Read what I already wrote. Try to be an adult instead of this board's Pee Wee Herman."
Thanks. I always enjoy winning.
"Holy cow, I thought you were pathetic, but now, now you're just pitiful."
Another out-of-context use of my words. Thanks, you are finally admitting my point, however tacitly.
"Self-serving excuses from Old "Brownshirt" Bear. What a fall from the former Oldbear."
Confusing me with Fascist Sam? Now you're bumbling, Oso!
"While I know you fancy yourself as some sort of master debater, you may want to take a pass on trying to respond with something pithy."

Still nothing of your own?
"You keep swinging at pitches not even there."
Bold move, in style terms but like everything else, an empty vessel.

As you once said Oso, I know you can do better.
"Given your known bias, no surprise but hardly evidence of actual candor or efforts to be objective."


Actually, that one is accurate in context, but only when directed at quash or Sam, and a couple of our more strident partisans.

But here it is still an air ball, out of bounds.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Lol. When in doubt add to the stockpile.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:


Lol. When in doubt add to the stockpile.



So that's a lawyer saying?
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

quash said:


Lol. When in doubt add to the stockpile.



So that's a lawyer saying?
"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:


The matches. They're so matchy.


So.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:


Lol. When in doubt add to the stockpile.



So that's a lawyer saying?
"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."
The difference is when I posted it, it was true. Against me ... nothing but weak and dull rhetoric.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:


Lol. When in doubt add to the stockpile.



So that's a lawyer saying?
"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."
The difference is when I posted it, it was true. Against me ... nothing but weak and dull rhetoric.
"Poor Brown shirt Oldbear"
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:


Lol. When in doubt add to the stockpile.



So that's a lawyer saying?
"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."
The difference is when I posted it, it was true. Against me ... nothing but weak and dull rhetoric.
"Poor Brown shirt Sam"
Corrected for accuracy.

That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:


Lol. When in doubt add to the stockpile.



So that's a lawyer saying?
"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."
The difference is when I posted it, it was true. Against me ... nothing but weak and dull rhetoric.
"Poor Brown shirt Sam"
Corrected for accuracy.
"Fascist Old"
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:


Lol. When in doubt add to the stockpile.



So that's a lawyer saying?
"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."
The difference is when I posted it, it was true. Against me ... nothing but weak and dull rhetoric.
"Poor Brown shirt Sam"
Corrected for accuracy.
"Fascist Old"
Now that doesn't even make grammatical sense
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:


Lol. When in doubt add to the stockpile.



So that's a lawyer saying?
"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."
The difference is when I posted it, it was true. Against me ... nothing but weak and dull rhetoric.
"Poor Brown shirt Sam"
Corrected for accuracy.
"Fascist Old"
Now that doesn't even make grammatical sense
"Poor Fascist Oldbear"

You thought it made sense once
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:


Lol. When in doubt add to the stockpile.



So that's a lawyer saying?
"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."
The difference is when I posted it, it was true. Against me ... nothing but weak and dull rhetoric.
"Poor Brown shirt Sam"
Corrected for accuracy.
"Fascist Old"
Now that doesn't even make grammatical sense
"Poor Fascist Oldbear"

You thought it made sense once
Since nothing I have posted comes even remotely close to supporting Fascism, your post has not improved, son.

I mean, the whole schtick is Cuomo-esque.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:


Lol. When in doubt add to the stockpile.



So that's a lawyer saying?
"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."
The difference is when I posted it, it was true. Against me ... nothing but weak and dull rhetoric.
"Poor Brown shirt Sam"
Corrected for accuracy.
"Fascist Old"
Now that doesn't even make grammatical sense
"Poor Fascist Oldbear"

You thought it made sense once
Since nothing I have posted comes even remotely close to supporting Fascism, your post has not improved, son.

I mean, the whole schtick is Cuomo-esque.
The schtick is pure Oldbear.

When you have nothing, you hurl "fascism" & "brownshirt"
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:


Lol. When in doubt add to the stockpile.



So that's a lawyer saying?
"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."
The difference is when I posted it, it was true. Against me ... nothing but weak and dull rhetoric.
"Poor Brown shirt Sam"
Corrected for accuracy.
"Fascist Old"
Now that doesn't even make grammatical sense
"Poor Fascist Oldbear"

You thought it made sense once
Since nothing I have posted comes even remotely close to supporting Fascism, your post has not improved, son.

I mean, the whole schtick is Cuomo-esque.
The schtick is pure Oldbear.

When you have nothing, you hurl "fascism" & "brownshirt"
Well, it's obvious you do.


I only do it when someone is acting in the classic fascist mode, such as government mask mandates and preventing doctors and nurses from speaking on the matter.

You seem inclined to do it whenever some won't denounce the former President, or when someone suggests election reform is a good idea.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:


Lol. When in doubt add to the stockpile.



So that's a lawyer saying?
"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."
The difference is when I posted it, it was true. Against me ... nothing but weak and dull rhetoric.
"Poor Brown shirt Sam"
Corrected for accuracy.
"Fascist Old"
Now that doesn't even make grammatical sense
"Poor Fascist Oldbear"

You thought it made sense once
Since nothing I have posted comes even remotely close to supporting Fascism, your post has not improved, son.

I mean, the whole schtick is Cuomo-esque.
The schtick is pure Oldbear.

When you have nothing, you hurl "fascism" & "brownshirt"
Well, it's obvious you do.


I only do it when someone is acting in the classic fascist mode, such as government mask mandates and preventing doctors and nurses from speaking on the matter.

You seem inclined to do it whenever some won't denounce the former President, or when someone suggests election reform is a good idea.
Poor sad brownshirt Oldbear
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:


Lol. When in doubt add to the stockpile.



So that's a lawyer saying?
"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."
The difference is when I posted it, it was true. Against me ... nothing but weak and dull rhetoric.
"Poor Brown shirt Sam"
Corrected for accuracy.
"Fascist Old"
Now that doesn't even make grammatical sense
"Poor Fascist Oldbear"

You thought it made sense once
Since nothing I have posted comes even remotely close to supporting Fascism, your post has not improved, son.

I mean, the whole schtick is Cuomo-esque.
The schtick is pure Oldbear.

When you have nothing, you hurl "fascism" & "brownshirt"
Well, it's obvious you do.


I only do it when someone is acting in the classic fascist mode, such as government mask mandates and preventing doctors and nurses from speaking on the matter.

You seem inclined to do it whenever some won't denounce the former President, or when someone suggests election reform is a good idea.
Poor sad brownshirt Oldbear
False, weak and boring posts by you won't do much to impress anyone but Sam, quash and AOC. .
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:


Lol. When in doubt add to the stockpile.



So that's a lawyer saying?
"You have chosen to build your position in a moral sewer. Can't imagine why, but the idea that you hold any kind of ethical credibility is absurd, verging on obscene."
The difference is when I posted it, it was true. Against me ... nothing but weak and dull rhetoric.
"Poor Brown shirt Sam"
Corrected for accuracy.
"Fascist Old"
Now that doesn't even make grammatical sense
"Poor Fascist Oldbear"

You thought it made sense once
Since nothing I have posted comes even remotely close to supporting Fascism, your post has not improved, son.

I mean, the whole schtick is Cuomo-esque.
The schtick is pure Oldbear.

When you have nothing, you hurl "fascism" & "brownshirt"
Well, it's obvious you do.


I only do it when someone is acting in the classic fascist mode, such as government mask mandates and preventing doctors and nurses from speaking on the matter.

You seem inclined to do it whenever some won't denounce the former President, or when someone suggests election reform is a good idea.
Poor sad brownshirt Oldbear
False, weak and boring posts by you won't do much to impress anyone but Sam, quash and AOC. .
Weak and boring posts by you trying to Impress Maxine Watters, Bernie Sanders & Biden
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wow, Oso, all this to avoid discussing the 45th President of the United States and his relevance to the 2024 election?
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Wow, Oso, all this to avoid discussing the 45th President of the United States and his relevance to the 2024 election?
Poor, weak ,sad brownshirt Oldbear
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The interesting thing about all this Statist paranoia, is the clear signal that Trump can win in 2024.

That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

The interesting thing about all this Statist paranoia, is the clear signal that Trump can win in 2024.
That's why Democrats want Trump to be the Republican nominee
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.