"Mostly peaceful" protester/tourist sentenced to 5 years for visiting the Capitol

24,554 Views | 443 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Oldbear83
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Wangchung said:

quash said:

Canon said:

Rawhide said:

quash said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

quash said:

ATL Bear said:

quash said:

ATL Bear said:

Osodecentx said:

ATL Bear said:

Osodecentx said:

Mothra said:

Osodecentx said:

Mothra said:

Osodecentx said:

Mothra said:

I think anyone who broke the law and committed violence on Jan. 6th needs to be held accountable. I've said that from day one. So, how is that "excusing" them?

Like you, I do wish Trump would go away. The difference between us is I don't let my personal dislike of the man make me nuts. I still have the ability to think rationally.
You're allegiance to your narrative determines your response

Video of mostly peaceful Jan 6 insurrection
HBO trailer 2 hours of mostly peaceful mob



I notice you didn't answer my question. Let me repeat it in case you missed it.

How is not believing this was a violent insurrection excusing the protestors who committed violence?

The only one married to a narrative here is you, bro.
Cool answer, Bro
Are you scared to answer my question? Too difficult for you?

Huh. Never figured you for a coward.
It's a fiction.
This was an insurrection trying to install the losing candidate as POTUS

You're spiinning Trump's narrative

Did I answer your question?

How could they have installed the losing candidate?
I don't think they could. They believed they could.
A stupid bank robber still tried to rob the bank
Harassing the tellers and the manager doesn't make you a bank robber.


This is what happens to a narrative when intent is excluded.

No, it's what happens when you stop looking for narratives and deal in the realities.

The reality is that those people stormed the capital to interfere with a valid election. Some of them with the expressed intent to use violence against the Vice President. You leave that reality out of your narrative. Why?

Armed with selfie sticks and MAGA flags in hand. LOL!!! The next "Insurrection" should bring some firearms. Just a suggestion.

81 million people? Bless your heart.


Over a hundred injured, five dead, **** smeared on the walls. Just strayed a little from the tour.



1 dead


Quash is a liar. He knows he lies.


"Ashli Babbitt, an Air Force veteran, was fatally shot by a Capitol Police officer as rioters tried to breach the House chamber.

Kevin D. Greeson died of a heart attack, collapsing on the sidewalk west of the Capitol on Jan. 6. (So natural causes)

Rosanne Boyland appeared to have been crushed in a stampede of fellow rioters as they surged against the police. (Coroner said she died of a drug overdose)

Benjamin Philips, the founder of a pro-Trump website called Trumparoo, died of a stroke. (Natural causes)
Officer Brian D. Sicknick of the Capitol Police, who was attacked by the mob, died on Jan. 7. (Died of stroke. Natural causes)

Officer Jeffrey Smith of the Metropolitan Police Department killed himself after the attack. (Self inflicted. Why even mention this?)

Officer Howard S. Liebengood of the Capitol Police also died by suicide four days afterward. ." (Again, self inflicted)
So only one person died due to the protest? Thanks for backing us up.
I thought they were just rowdy tourists
Rowdy tourists? Gee, I was told they were super terrorists just a breath away from wresting control of our government from the powers that be through use of smeared feces and fist shaking, cloud yelling geriatric rageā€¦
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

Osodecentx said:

Wangchung said:

quash said:

Canon said:

Rawhide said:

quash said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

quash said:

ATL Bear said:

quash said:

ATL Bear said:

Osodecentx said:

ATL Bear said:

Osodecentx said:

Mothra said:

Osodecentx said:

Mothra said:

Osodecentx said:

Mothra said:

I think anyone who broke the law and committed violence on Jan. 6th needs to be held accountable. I've said that from day one. So, how is that "excusing" them?

Like you, I do wish Trump would go away. The difference between us is I don't let my personal dislike of the man make me nuts. I still have the ability to think rationally.
You're allegiance to your narrative determines your response

Video of mostly peaceful Jan 6 insurrection
HBO trailer 2 hours of mostly peaceful mob



I notice you didn't answer my question. Let me repeat it in case you missed it.

How is not believing this was a violent insurrection excusing the protestors who committed violence?

The only one married to a narrative here is you, bro.
Cool answer, Bro
Are you scared to answer my question? Too difficult for you?

Huh. Never figured you for a coward.
It's a fiction.
This was an insurrection trying to install the losing candidate as POTUS

You're spiinning Trump's narrative

Did I answer your question?

How could they have installed the losing candidate?
I don't think they could. They believed they could.
A stupid bank robber still tried to rob the bank
Harassing the tellers and the manager doesn't make you a bank robber.


This is what happens to a narrative when intent is excluded.

No, it's what happens when you stop looking for narratives and deal in the realities.

The reality is that those people stormed the capital to interfere with a valid election. Some of them with the expressed intent to use violence against the Vice President. You leave that reality out of your narrative. Why?

Armed with selfie sticks and MAGA flags in hand. LOL!!! The next "Insurrection" should bring some firearms. Just a suggestion.

81 million people? Bless your heart.


Over a hundred injured, five dead, **** smeared on the walls. Just strayed a little from the tour.



1 dead


Quash is a liar. He knows he lies.


"Ashli Babbitt, an Air Force veteran, was fatally shot by a Capitol Police officer as rioters tried to breach the House chamber.

Kevin D. Greeson died of a heart attack, collapsing on the sidewalk west of the Capitol on Jan. 6. (So natural causes)

Rosanne Boyland appeared to have been crushed in a stampede of fellow rioters as they surged against the police. (Coroner said she died of a drug overdose)

Benjamin Philips, the founder of a pro-Trump website called Trumparoo, died of a stroke. (Natural causes)
Officer Brian D. Sicknick of the Capitol Police, who was attacked by the mob, died on Jan. 7. (Died of stroke. Natural causes)

Officer Jeffrey Smith of the Metropolitan Police Department killed himself after the attack. (Self inflicted. Why even mention this?)

Officer Howard S. Liebengood of the Capitol Police also died by suicide four days afterward. ." (Again, self inflicted)
So only one person died due to the protest? Thanks for backing us up.
I thought they were just rowdy tourists
Rowdy tourists?
Your words, not mine
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Wangchung said:

Osodecentx said:

Wangchung said:

quash said:

Canon said:

Rawhide said:

quash said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

quash said:

ATL Bear said:

quash said:

ATL Bear said:

Osodecentx said:

ATL Bear said:

Osodecentx said:

Mothra said:

Osodecentx said:

Mothra said:

Osodecentx said:

Mothra said:

I think anyone who broke the law and committed violence on Jan. 6th needs to be held accountable. I've said that from day one. So, how is that "excusing" them?

Like you, I do wish Trump would go away. The difference between us is I don't let my personal dislike of the man make me nuts. I still have the ability to think rationally.
You're allegiance to your narrative determines your response

Video of mostly peaceful Jan 6 insurrection
HBO trailer 2 hours of mostly peaceful mob



I notice you didn't answer my question. Let me repeat it in case you missed it.

How is not believing this was a violent insurrection excusing the protestors who committed violence?

The only one married to a narrative here is you, bro.
Cool answer, Bro
Are you scared to answer my question? Too difficult for you?

Huh. Never figured you for a coward.
It's a fiction.
This was an insurrection trying to install the losing candidate as POTUS

You're spiinning Trump's narrative

Did I answer your question?

How could they have installed the losing candidate?
I don't think they could. They believed they could.
A stupid bank robber still tried to rob the bank
Harassing the tellers and the manager doesn't make you a bank robber.


This is what happens to a narrative when intent is excluded.

No, it's what happens when you stop looking for narratives and deal in the realities.

The reality is that those people stormed the capital to interfere with a valid election. Some of them with the expressed intent to use violence against the Vice President. You leave that reality out of your narrative. Why?

Armed with selfie sticks and MAGA flags in hand. LOL!!! The next "Insurrection" should bring some firearms. Just a suggestion.

81 million people? Bless your heart.


Over a hundred injured, five dead, **** smeared on the walls. Just strayed a little from the tour.



1 dead


Quash is a liar. He knows he lies.


"Ashli Babbitt, an Air Force veteran, was fatally shot by a Capitol Police officer as rioters tried to breach the House chamber.

Kevin D. Greeson died of a heart attack, collapsing on the sidewalk west of the Capitol on Jan. 6. (So natural causes)

Rosanne Boyland appeared to have been crushed in a stampede of fellow rioters as they surged against the police. (Coroner said she died of a drug overdose)

Benjamin Philips, the founder of a pro-Trump website called Trumparoo, died of a stroke. (Natural causes)
Officer Brian D. Sicknick of the Capitol Police, who was attacked by the mob, died on Jan. 7. (Died of stroke. Natural causes)

Officer Jeffrey Smith of the Metropolitan Police Department killed himself after the attack. (Self inflicted. Why even mention this?)

Officer Howard S. Liebengood of the Capitol Police also died by suicide four days afterward. ." (Again, self inflicted)
So only one person died due to the protest? Thanks for backing us up.
I thought they were just rowdy tourists
Rowdy tourists?
Your words, not mine
They are as much mere tourists as they are dangerous insurrectionists. That's my point here. Being of lower intellect I sometimes find humor in dancing around the point I'm making through use of opposite but equally hyperbolic rhetoric with people who spout narrative rather than reality. It's a failing of mine but when you're dumb you have to find things to make yourself happy. Everything else is just too darned confounding.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Canon said:

quash said:

Canon said:

Rawhide said:

quash said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

quash said:

ATL Bear said:

quash said:

ATL Bear said:

Osodecentx said:

ATL Bear said:

Osodecentx said:

Mothra said:

Osodecentx said:

Mothra said:

Osodecentx said:

Mothra said:

I think anyone who broke the law and committed violence on Jan. 6th needs to be held accountable. I've said that from day one. So, how is that "excusing" them?

Like you, I do wish Trump would go away. The difference between us is I don't let my personal dislike of the man make me nuts. I still have the ability to think rationally.
You're allegiance to your narrative determines your response

Video of mostly peaceful Jan 6 insurrection
HBO trailer 2 hours of mostly peaceful mob



I notice you didn't answer my question. Let me repeat it in case you missed it.

How is not believing this was a violent insurrection excusing the protestors who committed violence?

The only one married to a narrative here is you, bro.
Cool answer, Bro
Are you scared to answer my question? Too difficult for you?

Huh. Never figured you for a coward.
It's a fiction.
This was an insurrection trying to install the losing candidate as POTUS

You're spiinning Trump's narrative

Did I answer your question?

How could they have installed the losing candidate?
I don't think they could. They believed they could.
A stupid bank robber still tried to rob the bank
Harassing the tellers and the manager doesn't make you a bank robber.


This is what happens to a narrative when intent is excluded.

No, it's what happens when you stop looking for narratives and deal in the realities.

The reality is that those people stormed the capital to interfere with a valid election. Some of them with the expressed intent to use violence against the Vice President. You leave that reality out of your narrative. Why?

Armed with selfie sticks and MAGA flags in hand. LOL!!! The next "Insurrection" should bring some firearms. Just a suggestion.

81 million people? Bless your heart.


Over a hundred injured, five dead, **** smeared on the walls. Just strayed a little from the tour.



1 dead


Quash is a liar. He knows he lies.


"Ashli Babbitt, an Air Force veteran, was fatally shot by a Capitol Police officer as rioters tried to breach the House chamber. Yep, killed by the state

Kevin D. Greeson died of a heart attack, collapsing on the sidewalk west of the Capitol on Jan. 6. Had high blood pressure. His death was deemed natural

Rosanne Boyland appeared to have been crushed in a stampede of fellow rioters as they surged against the police. Died from drug overdose

Benjamin Philips, the founder of a pro-Trump website called Trumparoo, died of a stroke.
Officer Brian D. Sicknick of the Capitol Police, who was attacked by the mob, died on Jan. 7. Once again, death deemed natural

Officer Jeffrey Smith of the Metropolitan Police Department killed himself after the attack. Washington law excludes suicide deaths from line-of-duty designation.

Officer Howard S. Liebengood of the Capitol Police also died by suicide four days afterward." See above


Thanks for cataloging your lies.


Funny way to say "Thanks for setting out the facts" but you do you big fella.

Fact, 1 person was killed at the Capitol on January 6th.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quash: "The truth is threats were made against the Vice President."

We don't know that. We know the media sold the narrative that people, number unknown, intent unknown, threatened the Vice-President. The fact that not one person has been charged with that specific crime is an indicator that the story, like so many from that day, may be false.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "The truth is threats were made against the Vice President."

We don't know that. We know the media sold the narrative that people, number unknown, intent unknown, threatened the Vice-President. The fact that not one person has been charged with that specific crime is an indicator that the story, like so many from that day, may be false.
The threats are on Twitter and video. Look at the HBO documentary.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "The truth is threats were made against the Vice President."

We don't know that. We know the media sold the narrative that people, number unknown, intent unknown, threatened the Vice-President. The fact that not one person has been charged with that specific crime is an indicator that the story, like so many from that day, may be false.
The threats are on Twitter and video. Look at the HBO documentary.
Welp, y'all got what you wanted. Federal weaponization against populist and conservatives Americans.



This will be used to target political beliefs.

Won't be long before forums like this are brought down because they're "breeding grounds for domestic terrorism".
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "The truth is threats were made against the Vice President."

We don't know that. We know the media sold the narrative that people, number unknown, intent unknown, threatened the Vice-President. The fact that not one person has been charged with that specific crime is an indicator that the story, like so many from that day, may be false.
The threats are on Twitter and video. Look at the HBO documentary.
Welp, y'all got what you wanted. Federal weaponization against populist and conservatives Americans.



This will be used to target political beliefs.

Won't be long before forums like this are brought down because they're "breeding grounds for domestic terrorism".
Do you think the violent Capitol rioters were just "rowdy tourists?
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "The truth is threats were made against the Vice President."

We don't know that. We know the media sold the narrative that people, number unknown, intent unknown, threatened the Vice-President. The fact that not one person has been charged with that specific crime is an indicator that the story, like so many from that day, may be false.
The threats are on Twitter and video. Look at the HBO documentary.
Welp, y'all got what you wanted. Federal weaponization against populist and conservatives Americans.



This will be used to target political beliefs.

Won't be long before forums like this are brought down because they're "breeding grounds for domestic terrorism".
Do you think the violent Capitol rioters were just "rowdy tourists?
They we're protestors who let FBI agents and political maniacs on site lure them into trespassing and vandalism through mob mentality.

And now the media has been using it to paint everyone who opposes democrats as potential terrorists. Now the DOJ is on board.
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Everyone knows they were violent terrorists worse than the aids epidemic multiplied by thirty Covid pandemics and added to a million Tulsa Riots!
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The horror. And here I thought watching people leap to their deaths to avoid dying by fire was bad, until I saw these images. Warning; very disturbing pictures of terrorists insurrecting the capitals.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "The truth is threats were made against the Vice President."

We don't know that. We know the media sold the narrative that people, number unknown, intent unknown, threatened the Vice-President. The fact that not one person has been charged with that specific crime is an indicator that the story, like so many from that day, may be false.
The threats are on Twitter and video. Look at the HBO documentary.
'HBO' and 'Documentary' are contradictory, you know.

Again, not one person has been charged with threatening the life of the VP . Eventually you may want to consider why.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "The truth is threats were made against the Vice President."

We don't know that. We know the media sold the narrative that people, number unknown, intent unknown, threatened the Vice-President. The fact that not one person has been charged with that specific crime is an indicator that the story, like so many from that day, may be false.
The threats are on Twitter and video. Look at the HBO documentary.
Welp, y'all got what you wanted. Federal weaponization against populist and conservatives Americans.



This will be used to target political beliefs.

Won't be long before forums like this are brought down because they're "breeding grounds for domestic terrorism".
Do you think the violent Capitol rioters were just "rowdy tourists?
They we're protestors who let FBI agents and political maniacs on site lure them into trespassing and vandalism through mob mentality.

And now the media has been using it to paint everyone who opposes democrats as potential terrorists. Now the DOJ is on board.
Were 140 Capitol police injured by the trespassers?
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "The truth is threats were made against the Vice President."

We don't know that. We know the media sold the narrative that people, number unknown, intent unknown, threatened the Vice-President. The fact that not one person has been charged with that specific crime is an indicator that the story, like so many from that day, may be false.
The threats are on Twitter and video. Look at the HBO documentary.
Welp, y'all got what you wanted. Federal weaponization against populist and conservatives Americans.



This will be used to target political beliefs.

Won't be long before forums like this are brought down because they're "breeding grounds for domestic terrorism".
Do you think the violent Capitol rioters were just "rowdy tourists?
They we're protestors who let FBI agents and political maniacs on site lure them into trespassing and vandalism through mob mentality.

And now the media has been using it to paint everyone who opposes democrats as potential terrorists. Now the DOJ is on board.
Were 140 Capitol police injured by the trespassers?
No, they were injured by rowdy tourists.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "The truth is threats were made against the Vice President."

We don't know that. We know the media sold the narrative that people, number unknown, intent unknown, threatened the Vice-President. The fact that not one person has been charged with that specific crime is an indicator that the story, like so many from that day, may be false.
The threats are on Twitter and video. Look at the HBO documentary.
Welp, y'all got what you wanted. Federal weaponization against populist and conservatives Americans.



This will be used to target political beliefs.

Won't be long before forums like this are brought down because they're "breeding grounds for domestic terrorism".
Do you think the violent Capitol rioters were just "rowdy tourists?
They we're protestors who let FBI agents and political maniacs on site lure them into trespassing and vandalism through mob mentality.

And now the media has been using it to paint everyone who opposes democrats as potential terrorists. Now the DOJ is on board.
Were 140 Capitol police injured by the trespassers?
How many police officers were injured by all those peaceful protests?
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rawhide said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "The truth is threats were made against the Vice President."

We don't know that. We know the media sold the narrative that people, number unknown, intent unknown, threatened the Vice-President. The fact that not one person has been charged with that specific crime is an indicator that the story, like so many from that day, may be false.
The threats are on Twitter and video. Look at the HBO documentary.
Welp, y'all got what you wanted. Federal weaponization against populist and conservatives Americans.



This will be used to target political beliefs.

Won't be long before forums like this are brought down because they're "breeding grounds for domestic terrorism".
Do you think the violent Capitol rioters were just "rowdy tourists?
They we're protestors who let FBI agents and political maniacs on site lure them into trespassing and vandalism through mob mentality.

And now the media has been using it to paint everyone who opposes democrats as potential terrorists. Now the DOJ is on board.
Were 140 Capitol police injured by the trespassers?
How many police officers were injured by all those peaceful protests?
140 cops were injured
Canon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Rawhide said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "The truth is threats were made against the Vice President."

We don't know that. We know the media sold the narrative that people, number unknown, intent unknown, threatened the Vice-President. The fact that not one person has been charged with that specific crime is an indicator that the story, like so many from that day, may be false.
The threats are on Twitter and video. Look at the HBO documentary.
Welp, y'all got what you wanted. Federal weaponization against populist and conservatives Americans.



This will be used to target political beliefs.

Won't be long before forums like this are brought down because they're "breeding grounds for domestic terrorism".
Do you think the violent Capitol rioters were just "rowdy tourists?
They we're protestors who let FBI agents and political maniacs on site lure them into trespassing and vandalism through mob mentality.

And now the media has been using it to paint everyone who opposes democrats as potential terrorists. Now the DOJ is on board.
Were 140 Capitol police injured by the trespassers?
How many police officers were injured by all those peaceful protests?
140 cops were injured
Spontaneous riots tend to injure those trying to stop them. It's a good thing not many cops were injured over the last 2 years in the north west.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Rawhide said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "The truth is threats were made against the Vice President."

We don't know that. We know the media sold the narrative that people, number unknown, intent unknown, threatened the Vice-President. The fact that not one person has been charged with that specific crime is an indicator that the story, like so many from that day, may be false.
The threats are on Twitter and video. Look at the HBO documentary.
Welp, y'all got what you wanted. Federal weaponization against populist and conservatives Americans.



This will be used to target political beliefs.

Won't be long before forums like this are brought down because they're "breeding grounds for domestic terrorism".
Do you think the violent Capitol rioters were just "rowdy tourists?
They we're protestors who let FBI agents and political maniacs on site lure them into trespassing and vandalism through mob mentality.

And now the media has been using it to paint everyone who opposes democrats as potential terrorists. Now the DOJ is on board.
Were 140 Capitol police injured by the trespassers?
How many police officers were injured by all those peaceful protests?
140 cops were injured
Let me spell it out, how many police officers were injured by all those peaceful protests that occurred for months and months across the country?
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "The truth is threats were made against the Vice President."

We don't know that. We know the media sold the narrative that people, number unknown, intent unknown, threatened the Vice-President. The fact that not one person has been charged with that specific crime is an indicator that the story, like so many from that day, may be false.
The threats are on Twitter and video. Look at the HBO documentary.
Welp, y'all got what you wanted. Federal weaponization against populist and conservatives Americans.



This will be used to target political beliefs.

Won't be long before forums like this are brought down because they're "breeding grounds for domestic terrorism".
Do you think the violent Capitol rioters were just "rowdy tourists?
They we're protestors who let FBI agents and political maniacs on site lure them into trespassing and vandalism through mob mentality.

And now the media has been using it to paint everyone who opposes democrats as potential terrorists. Now the DOJ is on board.
Were 140 Capitol police injured by the trespassers?
Not the ones that opened the doors and let people in.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "The truth is threats were made against the Vice President."

We don't know that. We know the media sold the narrative that people, number unknown, intent unknown, threatened the Vice-President. The fact that not one person has been charged with that specific crime is an indicator that the story, like so many from that day, may be false.
The threats are on Twitter and video. Look at the HBO documentary.
Welp, y'all got what you wanted. Federal weaponization against populist and conservatives Americans.



This will be used to target political beliefs.

Won't be long before forums like this are brought down because they're "breeding grounds for domestic terrorism".
Do you think the violent Capitol rioters were just "rowdy tourists?
They we're protestors who let FBI agents and political maniacs on site lure them into trespassing and vandalism through mob mentality.

And now the media has been using it to paint everyone who opposes democrats as potential terrorists. Now the DOJ is on board.
Were 140 Capitol police injured by the trespassers?
Not the ones that opened the doors and let people in.
These weren't opening the doors


Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "The truth is threats were made against the Vice President."

We don't know that. We know the media sold the narrative that people, number unknown, intent unknown, threatened the Vice-President. The fact that not one person has been charged with that specific crime is an indicator that the story, like so many from that day, may be false.
The threats are on Twitter and video. Look at the HBO documentary.
Welp, y'all got what you wanted. Federal weaponization against populist and conservatives Americans.



This will be used to target political beliefs.

Won't be long before forums like this are brought down because they're "breeding grounds for domestic terrorism".
Do you think the violent Capitol rioters were just "rowdy tourists?
They we're protestors who let FBI agents and political maniacs on site lure them into trespassing and vandalism through mob mentality.

And now the media has been using it to paint everyone who opposes democrats as potential terrorists. Now the DOJ is on board.
Were 140 Capitol police injured by the trespassers?
Not the ones that opened the doors and let people in.
Another

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2021/12/24/january-6-video-capitol-riot-schneider-ath-vpx.cnn
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rawhide said:

Osodecentx said:

Rawhide said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "The truth is threats were made against the Vice President."

We don't know that. We know the media sold the narrative that people, number unknown, intent unknown, threatened the Vice-President. The fact that not one person has been charged with that specific crime is an indicator that the story, like so many from that day, may be false.
The threats are on Twitter and video. Look at the HBO documentary.
Welp, y'all got what you wanted. Federal weaponization against populist and conservatives Americans.



This will be used to target political beliefs.

Won't be long before forums like this are brought down because they're "breeding grounds for domestic terrorism".
Do you think the violent Capitol rioters were just "rowdy tourists?
They we're protestors who let FBI agents and political maniacs on site lure them into trespassing and vandalism through mob mentality.

And now the media has been using it to paint everyone who opposes democrats as potential terrorists. Now the DOJ is on board.
Were 140 Capitol police injured by the trespassers?
How many police officers were injured by all those peaceful protests?
140 cops were injured
Let me spell it out, how many police officers were injured by all those peaceful protests that occurred for months and months across the country?
Sorry. I didn't understand. Too many cops were injured. Those who assaulted them should be prosecuted.

Because every perp isn't prosecuted doesn't mean the Capitol insurrectionists who assaulted the police should not be prosecuted
Canon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://rumble.com/vmva85-breaking-new-footage-from-jan.-6-riot-emerges.html

This is just brutal footage!!!
Canon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://rumble.com/vs2hep-january-6th-compilation-riot-maker.html

OH MY DEAR GOD!!!! This riot is SOOOOO much worse than the Antifa stuff we've seen for the last 20 months. Look at how very coordinated and insurrectioney it looks and stuff and junk.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Rawhide said:

Osodecentx said:

Rawhide said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "The truth is threats were made against the Vice President."

We don't know that. We know the media sold the narrative that people, number unknown, intent unknown, threatened the Vice-President. The fact that not one person has been charged with that specific crime is an indicator that the story, like so many from that day, may be false.
The threats are on Twitter and video. Look at the HBO documentary.
Welp, y'all got what you wanted. Federal weaponization against populist and conservatives Americans.



This will be used to target political beliefs.

Won't be long before forums like this are brought down because they're "breeding grounds for domestic terrorism".
Do you think the violent Capitol rioters were just "rowdy tourists?
They we're protestors who let FBI agents and political maniacs on site lure them into trespassing and vandalism through mob mentality.

And now the media has been using it to paint everyone who opposes democrats as potential terrorists. Now the DOJ is on board.
Were 140 Capitol police injured by the trespassers?
How many police officers were injured by all those peaceful protests?
140 cops were injured
Let me spell it out, how many police officers were injured by all those peaceful protests that occurred for months and months across the country?
Sorry. I didn't understand. Too many cops were injured. Those who assaulted them should be prosecuted.

Because every perp isn't prosecuted doesn't mean the Capitol insurrectionists who assaulted the police should not be prosecuted
And many have been prosecuted. Not for insurrection.
Canon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I sure as HELL hope they don't let these military geniuses and born tacticians, who fomented such a deadly insurrection-style walk through a building, to be in the same section of the maximum security prison they keep them all in for the rest of their lives. If they do, there will definitely be the rise of another international criminal gang grow out of such deadly prowess all harnessed in one location.



quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Quash: "The truth is threats were made against the Vice President."

We don't know that. We know the media sold the narrative that people, number unknown, intent unknown, threatened the Vice-President. The fact that not one person has been charged with that specific crime is an indicator that the story, like so many from that day, may be false.


We do know that. And we know you won't look at the evidence or do your homework.

The fact that nobody has been charged with terroristic threat was already explained to you. It has zero to do with whether threats were made but rather the proximity of the the threat maker.
ā€œLife, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.ā€ (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Poor quash. Determined to sell the lie no mater how rancid it gets.

Listen bub, no one was charged with trying to kill the VP because no one tried to kill the VP, just like no one was charged with sedition because that didn't happen either.

We have plenty of facts now to tell us what happened, like how Trump did not incite a damn thing, like well over 95% of the people in DC on Jan 6 committed no crime, and the ones that did overwhelmingly did misdemeanors like Trespassing. In fact, the only felony we know about for sure was the murder of Ms. Babbitt, although the officer who shot her will never see punishment in this life.

But your myopic habit of seeing evil only when you can blame it on Trump is a tired, old, arrogance that makes you look like a malicious fool, quash.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Poor quash. Determined to sell the lie no mater how rancid it gets.

Listen bub, no one was charged with trying to kill the VP because no one tried to kill the VP, just like no one was charged with sedition because that didn't happen either.

We have plenty of facts now to tell us what happened, like how Trump did not incite a damn thing, like well over 95% of the people in DC on Jan 6 committed no crime, and the ones that did overwhelmingly did misdemeanors like Trespassing. In fact, the only felony we know about for sure was the murder of Ms. Babbitt, although the officer who shot her will never see punishment in this life.

But your myopic habit of seeing evil only when you can blame it on Trump is a tired, old, arrogance that makes you look like a malicious fool, quash.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/oath-keepers-leader-stewart-rhodes-arrested-in-jan-6-capitol-riot-probe-11642099521?mod=hp_lead_pos11
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Oldbear83 said:

Poor quash. Determined to sell the lie no mater how rancid it gets.

Listen bub, no one was charged with trying to kill the VP because no one tried to kill the VP, just like no one was charged with sedition because that didn't happen either.

We have plenty of facts now to tell us what happened, like how Trump did not incite a damn thing, like well over 95% of the people in DC on Jan 6 committed no crime, and the ones that did overwhelmingly did misdemeanors like Trespassing. In fact, the only felony we know about for sure was the murder of Ms. Babbitt, although the officer who shot her will never see punishment in this life.

But your myopic habit of seeing evil only when you can blame it on Trump is a tired, old, arrogance that makes you look like a malicious fool, quash.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/oath-keepers-leader-stewart-rhodes-arrested-in-jan-6-capitol-riot-probe-11642099521?mod=hp_lead_pos11

So the political mirror image of Stasi Sam got himself in trouble. It may not bother Sam that Seditious Conspiracy (good luck proving it) is not itself actual Sedition, but for more than a year now he's been all about the accusation, not the facts anyway.

Let's Go Brandon.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Sam Lowry said:

Oldbear83 said:

Poor quash. Determined to sell the lie no mater how rancid it gets.

Listen bub, no one was charged with trying to kill the VP because no one tried to kill the VP, just like no one was charged with sedition because that didn't happen either.

We have plenty of facts now to tell us what happened, like how Trump did not incite a damn thing, like well over 95% of the people in DC on Jan 6 committed no crime, and the ones that did overwhelmingly did misdemeanors like Trespassing. In fact, the only felony we know about for sure was the murder of Ms. Babbitt, although the officer who shot her will never see punishment in this life.

But your myopic habit of seeing evil only when you can blame it on Trump is a tired, old, arrogance that makes you look like a malicious fool, quash.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/oath-keepers-leader-stewart-rhodes-arrested-in-jan-6-capitol-riot-probe-11642099521?mod=hp_lead_pos11

So the political mirror image of Stasi Sam got himself in trouble. It may not bother Sam that Seditious Conspiracy (good luck proving it) is not itself actual Sedition, but for more than a year now he's been all about the accusation, not the facts anyway.

Let's Go Brandon.
According to WSJ it is actual sedition.
"has filed charges of sedition"
armed "Quick Reaction Force
prepared to ferry weapons into Washington
amassing weapons in the Washington area.

WASHINGTONEleven people including Stewart Rhodes, the leader and founder of the right-wing militia group the Oath Keepers, have been indicted on charges of seditious conspiracy, marking an escalation of the Justice Department's investigation into the attackon the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 last year.
An indictment unsealed Thursday accused Mr. Rhodes, 56 years old, of organizing an armed plot to storm the Capitol and stop the certification of President Biden's election victory.
The case marks the first time the Justice Department has filed charges of sedition related to the attack and comes days after Attorney General Merrick Garland promised that prosecutors would charge anyone responsible for the Capitol riot "at any level," not just those who breached the building. Mr. Rhodes didn't enter the building that day, but prosecutors said he directed his followers there, setting in motion the violence.
His lawyer, Jonathon Moseley, said he was on the phone with Mr. Rhodes on Thursday afternoon when agents showed up at his client's home in Granbury, Texas.
A conviction isn't contingent on the conspiracy being successful and carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison, though defendants rarely receive that. Mr. Rhodes is also charged with numerous other counts related to obstruction of an official proceeding, which could factor into any sentencing decision if he is found guilty.
Prosecutors say Mr. Rhodes and other members of the Oath Keepers used encrypted communications apps to coordinate a series of actions leading up to their actions on Jan. 6, including organizing into teams and amassing weapons in the Washington area.
Once protesters had breached the Capitol perimeter, prosecutors say, members of the Oath Keepers marched into the Capitol as a team in "stack formation," a single-file military tactic. The group then split up, with half of the Oath Keepers headed for the U.S. Senate chamber while the other half set out for the House ofRepresentatives on the other end of the Capitol building, according to the indictment.
Prosecutors allege the group headed for the House was searching for Speaker Nancy Pelosi,who had been evacuated from the chamber by her security detail when the breach began. The Oath Keepers who tried to breach the Senate side were repelled by law enforcement, the indictment says.

The Oath Keepers allegedly also had an armed "Quick Reaction Force" stationed at a Comfort Inn in Arlington, Va., and other locations just outside the capital. They were prepared to ferry weapons into Washington in support of Oath Keepers operations, prosecutors say.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Read it again. "Seditious Conspiracy" is not the same as Sedition, and frankly I doubt they can prove the conspiracy charge.

In any case my point remains valid, and the fact that some dance so hard around the plain fact that the idiots who broke the law were few and for the most part very minor is telling about their intentions.

The facts are coming out, and the accusers are looking more and more like the paranoid conspiracy nuts in this matter.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:


Read it again. "Seditious Conspiracy" is not the same as Sedition, and frankly I doubt they can prove the conspiracy charge.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.