Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

quash said:

---

Government idea cancels. What could go wrong?

---

Maybe we should have Hustler as reading material for 2nd graders too?

Nobody cancelled an idea. If you can't teach Kindergarteners about gay sex we are burning books? Getting a little extreme.

Funny, it is ok to raise the age to own a gun to 25 to defend yourself, but when discussing homosexualuty we are barbarians if we don't instruct our K-3? You really don't see something wrong with that???

---

I have a real problem with states banning ideas. Do you want states to have the power to force pronouns on you? You don't see something wrong with that?

Meanwhile I think we can rely on the laws we have that allow parents to question these things. Unfortunately we burden the districts with both legit claims and those of that Karen at Lake Travis. Better that than state action. Texas could turn blue again and copy Gov. Abbot's massive use of EOs. I'd rather states not abuse their power. It's a Libertarian thing.

---

Gov't putting limits on itself, its entities and its employees is very much a Libertarian thing. You keep treating public schools as private business and state teachers as private employees. That's not correct

---

I never said anything like that. What an odd response.

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

quash said:

---

Government idea cancels. What could go wrong?

---

Maybe we should have Hustler as reading material for 2nd graders too?

Nobody cancelled an idea. If you can't teach Kindergarteners about gay sex we are burning books? Getting a little extreme.

Funny, it is ok to raise the age to own a gun to 25 to defend yourself, but when discussing homosexualuty we are barbarians if we don't instruct our K-3? You really don't see something wrong with that???

---

I have a real problem with states banning ideas. Do you want states to have the power to force pronouns on you? You don't see something wrong with that?

Meanwhile I think we can rely on the laws we have that allow parents to question these things. Unfortunately we burden the districts with both legit claims and those of that Karen at Lake Travis. Better that than state action. Texas could turn blue again and copy Gov. Abbot's massive use of EOs. I'd rather states not abuse their power. It's a Libertarian thing.

---

Gov't putting limits on itself, its entities and its employees is very much a Libertarian thing. You keep treating public schools as private business and state teachers as private employees. That's not correct

---

I never said anything like that. What an odd response.

---

You don't have to say it out loud to treat it as such and you know it.

Your original post is odd.

So, I guess you'd support K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

RMF5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Is it possible he was only talking about banning ideas in public school, not the whole society?

---

This is about school curriculum and teachers teaching adult level concepts to K-3, not the ideas. I am really shocked that some are against waiting until kids are older to get into sex ed...

---

I'm not against it. Let's just be honest. It is a ban on certain ideas in certain classrooms, and rightly so.

---

I think the piece your missing is the age. Nobody is saying that Middle School and High School kids that have these questions shouldn't be able to find help to understand. Only keep it age appropriate.

I would also like to see a more balanced, medical approach, not just blind acceptance that anything you feel at 14 is correct or more importantly will be the way you always feel. I can think of a lot of bad decisions 14 year olds can make if left to their own devices!

Others may and will disagree with me.

---

Florida is prohibiting the communication of an idea (transgenderism, gender fluidity) to students in 3rd grade and under. This is good thing and I see nothing wrong with it. But it is prohibiting the communication of an idea to public school students.

What's wrong with saying the bill prohibits the communication of ideas. It is a good bill

ALL politics aside, anyone considering any type of medical sex/gender transition for themself - much less a child (!) - should do a research deep-dive into what's involved.

This is a pretty typical description of both the effects of puberty blockers and of "vaginoplasty." pic.twitter.com/ZSif1ij78c

— Wilfred Reilly (@wil_da_beast630) April 17, 2022

Maybe we should disallow all gender confusing talk until high school. I think we will look back on this time and these frankenstein surgeries in horror.

Osodecentx said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Is it possible he was only talking about banning ideas in public school, not the whole society?

---

This is about school curriculum and teachers teaching adult level concepts to K-3, not the ideas. I am really shocked that some are against waiting until kids are older to get into sex ed...

---

I'm not against it. Let's just be honest. It is a ban on certain ideas in certain classrooms, and rightly so.

---

I think the piece your missing is the age. Nobody is saying that Middle School and High School kids that have these questions shouldn't be able to find help to understand. Only keep it age appropriate.

I would also like to see a more balanced, medical approach, not just blind acceptance that anything you feel at 14 is correct or more importantly will be the way you always feel. I can think of a lot of bad decisions 14 year olds can make if left to their own devices!

Others may and will disagree with me.

---

Florida is prohibiting the communication of an idea (transgenderism, gender fluidity) to students in 3rd grade and under. This is good thing and I see nothing wrong with it. But it is prohibiting the communication of an idea to public school students.

What's wrong with saying the bill prohibits the communication of ideas. It is a good bill

---

Because "banning ideas" is a broad term with negative connotations that doesn't apply here.

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Is it possible he was only talking about banning ideas in public school, not the whole society?

---

This is about school curriculum and teachers teaching adult level concepts to K-3, not the ideas. I am really shocked that some are against waiting until kids are older to get into sex ed...

---

I'm not against it. Let's just be honest. It is a ban on certain ideas in certain classrooms, and rightly so.

---

I think the piece your missing is the age. Nobody is saying that Middle School and High School kids that have these questions shouldn't be able to find help to understand. Only keep it age appropriate.

I would also like to see a more balanced, medical approach, not just blind acceptance that anything you feel at 14 is correct or more importantly will be the way you always feel. I can think of a lot of bad decisions 14 year olds can make if left to their own devices!

Others may and will disagree with me.

---

Florida is prohibiting the communication of an idea (transgenderism, gender fluidity) to students in 3rd grade and under. This is good thing and I see nothing wrong with it. But it is prohibiting the communication of an idea to public school students.

What's wrong with saying the bill prohibits the communication of ideas. It is a good bill

---

Because "banning ideas" is a broad term with negative connotations that doesn't apply here.

---

"Convince a man against his will, he's in the same opinion still"

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Is it possible he was only talking about banning ideas in public school, not the whole society?

---

This is about school curriculum and teachers teaching adult level concepts to K-3, not the ideas. I am really shocked that some are against waiting until kids are older to get into sex ed...

---

I'm not against it. Let's just be honest. It is a ban on certain ideas in certain classrooms, and rightly so.

---

I think the piece your missing is the age. Nobody is saying that Middle School and High School kids that have these questions shouldn't be able to find help to understand. Only keep it age appropriate.

I would also like to see a more balanced, medical approach, not just blind acceptance that anything you feel at 14 is correct or more importantly will be the way you always feel. I can think of a lot of bad decisions 14 year olds can make if left to their own devices!

Others may and will disagree with me.

---

Florida is prohibiting the communication of an idea (transgenderism, gender fluidity) to students in 3rd grade and under. This is good thing and I see nothing wrong with it. But it is prohibiting the communication of an idea to public school students.

What's wrong with saying the bill prohibits the communication of ideas. It is a good bill

---

Because "banning ideas" is a broad term with negative connotations that doesn't apply here.

---

"Convince a man against his will, he's in the same opinion still"

---

I am not trying to convince quash of anything. Just speaking truth, which he already knows.

---

BS

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Is it possible he was only talking about banning ideas in public school, not the whole society?

---

This is about school curriculum and teachers teaching adult level concepts to K-3, not the ideas. I am really shocked that some are against waiting until kids are older to get into sex ed...

---

I'm not against it. Let's just be honest. It is a ban on certain ideas in certain classrooms, and rightly so.

---

I think the piece your missing is the age. Nobody is saying that Middle School and High School kids that have these questions shouldn't be able to find help to understand. Only keep it age appropriate.

I would also like to see a more balanced, medical approach, not just blind acceptance that anything you feel at 14 is correct or more importantly will be the way you always feel. I can think of a lot of bad decisions 14 year olds can make if left to their own devices!

Others may and will disagree with me.

---

Florida is prohibiting the communication of an idea (transgenderism, gender fluidity) to students in 3rd grade and under. This is good thing and I see nothing wrong with it. But it is prohibiting the communication of an idea to public school students.

What's wrong with saying the bill prohibits the communication of ideas. It is a good bill

---

Because "banning ideas" is a broad term with negative connotations that doesn't apply here.

---

"Convince a man against his will, he's in the same opinion still"

---

I am not trying to convince quash of anything. Just speaking truth, which he already knows.

---

BS

---

So you believe I am trying to convince quash of what he already knows? Huh.

You're a weird dude.

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

quash said:

---

Government idea cancels. What could go wrong?

---

Maybe we should have Hustler as reading material for 2nd graders too?

Nobody cancelled an idea. If you can't teach Kindergarteners about gay sex we are burning books? Getting a little extreme.

Funny, it is ok to raise the age to own a gun to 25 to defend yourself, but when discussing homosexualuty we are barbarians if we don't instruct our K-3? You really don't see something wrong with that???

---

I have a real problem with states banning ideas. Do you want states to have the power to force pronouns on you? You don't see something wrong with that?

Meanwhile I think we can rely on the laws we have that allow parents to question these things. Unfortunately we burden the districts with both legit claims and those of that Karen at Lake Travis. Better that than state action. Texas could turn blue again and copy Gov. Abbot's massive use of EOs. I'd rather states not abuse their power. It's a Libertarian thing.

---

Gov't putting limits on itself, its entities and its employees is very much a Libertarian thing. You keep treating public schools as private business and state teachers as private employees. That's not correct

---

I never said anything like that. What an odd response.

---

You don't have to say it out loud to treat it as such and you know it.

Your original post is odd.

So, I guess you'd support K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

Why do you get to just make up stuff like it's real?

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Is it possible he was only talking about banning ideas in public school, not the whole society?

---

This is about school curriculum and teachers teaching adult level concepts to K-3, not the ideas. I am really shocked that some are against waiting until kids are older to get into sex ed...

---

I'm not against it. Let's just be honest. It is a ban on certain ideas in certain classrooms, and rightly so.

---

I think the piece your missing is the age. Nobody is saying that Middle School and High School kids that have these questions shouldn't be able to find help to understand. Only keep it age appropriate.

I would also like to see a more balanced, medical approach, not just blind acceptance that anything you feel at 14 is correct or more importantly will be the way you always feel. I can think of a lot of bad decisions 14 year olds can make if left to their own devices!

Others may and will disagree with me.

---

Florida is prohibiting the communication of an idea (transgenderism, gender fluidity) to students in 3rd grade and under. This is good thing and I see nothing wrong with it. But it is prohibiting the communication of an idea to public school students.

What's wrong with saying the bill prohibits the communication of ideas. It is a good bill

---

Because "banning ideas" is a broad term with negative connotations that doesn't apply here.

---

"Convince a man against his will, he's in the same opinion still"

---

I am not trying to convince quash of anything. Just speaking truth, which he already knows.

---

BS

---

So you believe I am trying to convince quash of what he already knows? Huh.

You're a weird dude.

---

Your track record of assuming what I know is poor.

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

quash said:

---

Government idea cancels. What could go wrong?

---

Maybe we should have Hustler as reading material for 2nd graders too?

Nobody cancelled an idea. If you can't teach Kindergarteners about gay sex we are burning books? Getting a little extreme.

Funny, it is ok to raise the age to own a gun to 25 to defend yourself, but when discussing homosexualuty we are barbarians if we don't instruct our K-3? You really don't see something wrong with that???

---

I have a real problem with states banning ideas. Do you want states to have the power to force pronouns on you? You don't see something wrong with that?

Meanwhile I think we can rely on the laws we have that allow parents to question these things. Unfortunately we burden the districts with both legit claims and those of that Karen at Lake Travis. Better that than state action. Texas could turn blue again and copy Gov. Abbot's massive use of EOs. I'd rather states not abuse their power. It's a Libertarian thing.

---

Gov't putting limits on itself, its entities and its employees is very much a Libertarian thing. You keep treating public schools as private business and state teachers as private employees. That's not correct

---

I never said anything like that. What an odd response.

---

You don't have to say it out loud to treat it as such and you know it.

Your original post is odd.

So, I guess you'd support K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

Why do you get to just make up stuff like it's real?

---

So, would you be for K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

quash said:

---

Government idea cancels. What could go wrong?

---

Maybe we should have Hustler as reading material for 2nd graders too?

Nobody cancelled an idea. If you can't teach Kindergarteners about gay sex we are burning books? Getting a little extreme.

Funny, it is ok to raise the age to own a gun to 25 to defend yourself, but when discussing homosexualuty we are barbarians if we don't instruct our K-3? You really don't see something wrong with that???

---

I have a real problem with states banning ideas. Do you want states to have the power to force pronouns on you? You don't see something wrong with that?

Meanwhile I think we can rely on the laws we have that allow parents to question these things. Unfortunately we burden the districts with both legit claims and those of that Karen at Lake Travis. Better that than state action. Texas could turn blue again and copy Gov. Abbot's massive use of EOs. I'd rather states not abuse their power. It's a Libertarian thing.

---

Gov't putting limits on itself, its entities and its employees is very much a Libertarian thing. You keep treating public schools as private business and state teachers as private employees. That's not correct

---

I never said anything like that. What an odd response.

---

You don't have to say it out loud to treat it as such and you know it.

Your original post is odd.

So, I guess you'd support K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

Why do you get to just make up stuff like it's real?

---

So, would you be for K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

I think K-3 should be reading.

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

quash said:

---

Government idea cancels. What could go wrong?

---

Maybe we should have Hustler as reading material for 2nd graders too?

Nobody cancelled an idea. If you can't teach Kindergarteners about gay sex we are burning books? Getting a little extreme.

Funny, it is ok to raise the age to own a gun to 25 to defend yourself, but when discussing homosexualuty we are barbarians if we don't instruct our K-3? You really don't see something wrong with that???

---

I have a real problem with states banning ideas. Do you want states to have the power to force pronouns on you? You don't see something wrong with that?

Meanwhile I think we can rely on the laws we have that allow parents to question these things. Unfortunately we burden the districts with both legit claims and those of that Karen at Lake Travis. Better that than state action. Texas could turn blue again and copy Gov. Abbot's massive use of EOs. I'd rather states not abuse their power. It's a Libertarian thing.

---

Gov't putting limits on itself, its entities and its employees is very much a Libertarian thing. You keep treating public schools as private business and state teachers as private employees. That's not correct

---

I never said anything like that. What an odd response.

---

You don't have to say it out loud to treat it as such and you know it.

Your original post is odd.

So, I guess you'd support K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

Why do you get to just make up stuff like it's real?

---

So, would you be for K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

I think K-3 should be reading.

---

The bible?

You still didn't answer the question

So, would you be for K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

quash said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Is it possible he was only talking about banning ideas in public school, not the whole society?

---

This is about school curriculum and teachers teaching adult level concepts to K-3, not the ideas. I am really shocked that some are against waiting until kids are older to get into sex ed...

---

I'm not against it. Let's just be honest. It is a ban on certain ideas in certain classrooms, and rightly so.

---

I think the piece your missing is the age. Nobody is saying that Middle School and High School kids that have these questions shouldn't be able to find help to understand. Only keep it age appropriate.

I would also like to see a more balanced, medical approach, not just blind acceptance that anything you feel at 14 is correct or more importantly will be the way you always feel. I can think of a lot of bad decisions 14 year olds can make if left to their own devices!

Others may and will disagree with me.

---

Florida is prohibiting the communication of an idea (transgenderism, gender fluidity) to students in 3rd grade and under. This is good thing and I see nothing wrong with it. But it is prohibiting the communication of an idea to public school students.

What's wrong with saying the bill prohibits the communication of ideas. It is a good bill

---

Because "banning ideas" is a broad term with negative connotations that doesn't apply here.

---

"Convince a man against his will, he's in the same opinion still"

---

I am not trying to convince quash of anything. Just speaking truth, which he already knows.

---

BS

---

So you believe I am trying to convince quash of what he already knows? Huh.

You're a weird dude.

---

Your track record of assuming what I know is poor.

---

Perhaps you're not as smart as I've given you credit for.

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

quash said:

---

Government idea cancels. What could go wrong?

---

Maybe we should have Hustler as reading material for 2nd graders too?

Nobody cancelled an idea. If you can't teach Kindergarteners about gay sex we are burning books? Getting a little extreme.

Funny, it is ok to raise the age to own a gun to 25 to defend yourself, but when discussing homosexualuty we are barbarians if we don't instruct our K-3? You really don't see something wrong with that???

---

I have a real problem with states banning ideas. Do you want states to have the power to force pronouns on you? You don't see something wrong with that?

Meanwhile I think we can rely on the laws we have that allow parents to question these things. Unfortunately we burden the districts with both legit claims and those of that Karen at Lake Travis. Better that than state action. Texas could turn blue again and copy Gov. Abbot's massive use of EOs. I'd rather states not abuse their power. It's a Libertarian thing.

---

Gov't putting limits on itself, its entities and its employees is very much a Libertarian thing. You keep treating public schools as private business and state teachers as private employees. That's not correct

---

I never said anything like that. What an odd response.

---

You don't have to say it out loud to treat it as such and you know it.

Your original post is odd.

So, I guess you'd support K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

Why do you get to just make up stuff like it's real?

---

So, would you be for K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

I think K-3 should be reading.

---

About homosexual sex and transgenderism?

Mothra said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

quash said:

---

Government idea cancels. What could go wrong?

---

Maybe we should have Hustler as reading material for 2nd graders too?

Nobody cancelled an idea. If you can't teach Kindergarteners about gay sex we are burning books? Getting a little extreme.

Funny, it is ok to raise the age to own a gun to 25 to defend yourself, but when discussing homosexualuty we are barbarians if we don't instruct our K-3? You really don't see something wrong with that???

---

I have a real problem with states banning ideas. Do you want states to have the power to force pronouns on you? You don't see something wrong with that?

Meanwhile I think we can rely on the laws we have that allow parents to question these things. Unfortunately we burden the districts with both legit claims and those of that Karen at Lake Travis. Better that than state action. Texas could turn blue again and copy Gov. Abbot's massive use of EOs. I'd rather states not abuse their power. It's a Libertarian thing.

---

Gov't putting limits on itself, its entities and its employees is very much a Libertarian thing. You keep treating public schools as private business and state teachers as private employees. That's not correct

---

I never said anything like that. What an odd response.

---

You don't have to say it out loud to treat it as such and you know it.

Your original post is odd.

So, I guess you'd support K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

Why do you get to just make up stuff like it's real?

---

So, would you be for K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

I think K-3 should be reading.

---

About homosexual sex and transgenderism?

---

Dick & Dick or Jane and Jane?

How Dick becomes Jane?

Dick and Spot? (Open minded???)

Dick thinks he's Jane?

Jane want to be Dick?

"Dick dresses as Jane vs Dick becomes Jane: a tudorial" plus coloring book

Jane likes purple, so why can't I be Dick?

Just to show the level of conversation of what we are talking about here....

Not that there's anything wrong with it....

Ok, we will take Spot out of it, cheap shot.

Cobretti said:

---

🚨BREAKING: Florida Senate, on a 23-16 vote, just passed legislation ENDING Disney’s tax privilege, self-governing power & special exemption status.

— Tim Swain (@SwainForSenate) April 20, 2022

---

Good for Florida

Cobretti said:

---

🚨BREAKING: Florida Senate, on a 23-16 vote, just passed legislation ENDING Disney’s tax privilege, self-governing power & special exemption status.

— Tim Swain (@SwainForSenate) April 20, 2022

---

NYTimes
Gov. Ron DeSantis clears a way to revoke Disney's special district in Florida.
The Florida Senate approved a move to end Disney World's self-governing privileges starting next year.

In a move widely seen as retaliation, Gov. Ron DeSantis asked Florida lawmakers on Tuesday to consider the "termination" of self-governing privileges that Disney World has held in the Orlando area for 55 years. He acted after Disney, the state's largest private employer, paused political donations in Florida and condemned a new state education law that opponents call "Don't Say Gay."
On Wednesday, the Florida Senate voted 23 to 16 to revoke the privileges starting in June of next year. The Florida House must now take up the measure.
The potential impact on Disney World is unclear. The privileges exempt the resort from certain regulations and fees.
The Florida Legislature had already been scheduled to convene this week for a special session on congressional redistricting. On Tuesday, Mr. DeSantis, a Republican, issued a proclamation allowing the Republican-controlled body to also take up bills that would eliminate special tax districts that were created before 1968.

A former press secretary for the Bernie Sanders presidential campaign is cheering on mega corporation lobbyists. This is what the left is now. It was always about power. https://t.co/Ga806ODRSS

— Jarrett Stepman (@JarrettStepman) April 20, 2022

Cobretti said:

---

A former press secretary for the Bernie Sanders presidential campaign is cheering on mega corporation lobbyists. This is what the left is now. It was always about power. https://t.co/Ga806ODRSS

— Jarrett Stepman (@JarrettStepman) April 20, 2022

---

GI Jane 2 - can't wait to see it!

Osodecentx said:

---

Cobretti said:

---

🚨BREAKING: Florida Senate, on a 23-16 vote, just passed legislation ENDING Disney’s tax privilege, self-governing power & special exemption status.

— Tim Swain (@SwainForSenate) April 20, 2022

---

NYTimes
Gov. Ron DeSantis clears a way to revoke Disney's special district in Florida.
The Florida Senate approved a move to end Disney World's self-governing privileges starting next year.

In a move widely seen as retaliation, Gov. Ron DeSantis asked Florida lawmakers on Tuesday to consider the "termination" of self-governing privileges that Disney World has held in the Orlando area for 55 years. He acted after Disney, the state's largest private employer, paused political donations in Florida and condemned a new state education law that opponents call "Don't Say Gay."
On Wednesday, the Florida Senate voted 23 to 16 to revoke the privileges starting in June of next year. The Florida House must now take up the measure.
The potential impact on Disney World is unclear. The privileges exempt the resort from certain regulations and fees.
The Florida Legislature had already been scheduled to convene this week for a special session on congressional redistricting. On Tuesday, Mr. DeSantis, a Republican, issued a proclamation allowing the Republican-controlled body to also take up bills that would eliminate special tax districts that were created before 1968.

---

Disney's insane superwoke leadership has damaged the company, perhaps permanently. If I'm a shareholder, I'm furious.

Jack Bauer said:

---

Cobretti said:

---

A former press secretary for the Bernie Sanders presidential campaign is cheering on mega corporation lobbyists. This is what the left is now. It was always about power. https://t.co/Ga806ODRSS

— Jarrett Stepman (@JarrettStepman) April 20, 2022

---

GI Jane 2 - can't wait to see it!

---

Disney should not have special tax provisions whatsoever. They are a business, just like the rest of us. Pay up. Btw, I have never been, now would I ever go. We told our kids. We will travel the world, but if you want to go to Disney, that is on you!

BearFan33 said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Cobretti said:

---

🚨BREAKING: Florida Senate, on a 23-16 vote, just passed legislation ENDING Disney’s tax privilege, self-governing power & special exemption status.

— Tim Swain (@SwainForSenate) April 20, 2022

---

NYTimes
Gov. Ron DeSantis clears a way to revoke Disney's special district in Florida.
The Florida Senate approved a move to end Disney World's self-governing privileges starting next year.

In a move widely seen as retaliation, Gov. Ron DeSantis asked Florida lawmakers on Tuesday to consider the "termination" of self-governing privileges that Disney World has held in the Orlando area for 55 years. He acted after Disney, the state's largest private employer, paused political donations in Florida and condemned a new state education law that opponents call "Don't Say Gay."
On Wednesday, the Florida Senate voted 23 to 16 to revoke the privileges starting in June of next year. The Florida House must now take up the measure.
The potential impact on Disney World is unclear. The privileges exempt the resort from certain regulations and fees.
The Florida Legislature had already been scheduled to convene this week for a special session on congressional redistricting. On Tuesday, Mr. DeSantis, a Republican, issued a proclamation allowing the Republican-controlled body to also take up bills that would eliminate special tax districts that were created before 1968.

---

Disney's insane superwoke leadership has damaged the company, perhaps permanently. If I'm a shareholder, I'm furious.

---

I used to have Disney stock. I got rid of it. Won't be buying anymore.

Rawhide said:

---

BearFan33 said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Cobretti said:

---

🚨BREAKING: Florida Senate, on a 23-16 vote, just passed legislation ENDING Disney’s tax privilege, self-governing power & special exemption status.

— Tim Swain (@SwainForSenate) April 20, 2022

---

NYTimes
Gov. Ron DeSantis clears a way to revoke Disney's special district in Florida.
The Florida Senate approved a move to end Disney World's self-governing privileges starting next year.

In a move widely seen as retaliation, Gov. Ron DeSantis asked Florida lawmakers on Tuesday to consider the "termination" of self-governing privileges that Disney World has held in the Orlando area for 55 years. He acted after Disney, the state's largest private employer, paused political donations in Florida and condemned a new state education law that opponents call "Don't Say Gay."
On Wednesday, the Florida Senate voted 23 to 16 to revoke the privileges starting in June of next year. The Florida House must now take up the measure.
The potential impact on Disney World is unclear. The privileges exempt the resort from certain regulations and fees.
The Florida Legislature had already been scheduled to convene this week for a special session on congressional redistricting. On Tuesday, Mr. DeSantis, a Republican, issued a proclamation allowing the Republican-controlled body to also take up bills that would eliminate special tax districts that were created before 1968.

---

Disney's insane superwoke leadership has damaged the company, perhaps permanently. If I'm a shareholder, I'm furious.

---

I used to have Disney stock. I got rid of it. Won't be buying anymore.

---

Won't someone think of the nonbinary children?

J.R. said:

---

Disney should not have special tax provisions whatsoever. They are a business, just like the rest of us. Pay up. Btw, I have never been, now would I ever go. We told our kids. We will travel the world, but if you want to go to Disney, that is on you!

---

Had my honeymoon at WDW. It was a blast. It was great. It was under different leadership then.

Osodecentx said:

---

Cobretti said:

---

🚨BREAKING: Florida Senate, on a 23-16 vote, just passed legislation ENDING Disney’s tax privilege, self-governing power & special exemption status.

— Tim Swain (@SwainForSenate) April 20, 2022

---

Good for Florida

---

Love it .

Mothra said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Mothra said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

quash said:

---

Government idea cancels. What could go wrong?

---

Maybe we should have Hustler as reading material for 2nd graders too?

Nobody cancelled an idea. If you can't teach Kindergarteners about gay sex we are burning books? Getting a little extreme.

Funny, it is ok to raise the age to own a gun to 25 to defend yourself, but when discussing homosexualuty we are barbarians if we don't instruct our K-3? You really don't see something wrong with that???

---

I have a real problem with states banning ideas. Do you want states to have the power to force pronouns on you? You don't see something wrong with that?

Meanwhile I think we can rely on the laws we have that allow parents to question these things. Unfortunately we burden the districts with both legit claims and those of that Karen at Lake Travis. Better that than state action. Texas could turn blue again and copy Gov. Abbot's massive use of EOs. I'd rather states not abuse their power. It's a Libertarian thing.

---

Gov't putting limits on itself, its entities and its employees is very much a Libertarian thing. You keep treating public schools as private business and state teachers as private employees. That's not correct

---

I never said anything like that. What an odd response.

---

You don't have to say it out loud to treat it as such and you know it.

Your original post is odd.

So, I guess you'd support K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

Why do you get to just make up stuff like it's real?

---

So, would you be for K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

I think K-3 should be reading.

---

About homosexual sex and transgenderism?

---

Dick & Dick or Jane and Jane?

How Dick becomes Jane?

Dick and Spot? (Open minded???)

Dick thinks he's Jane?

Jane want to be Dick?

"Dick dresses as Jane vs Dick becomes Jane: a tudorial" plus coloring book

Jane likes purple, so why can't I be Dick?

Just to show the level of conversation of what we are talking about here....

Not that there's anything wrong with it....

Ok, we will take Spot out of it, cheap shot.

---

Apparently, quash believes allowing teachers to teach kindergartners about gay sex is libertarian.

Only in quash's warped world.

---

Apparently? Based on what? Try to be specific for once

Osodecentx said:

---

Cobretti said:

---

🚨BREAKING: Florida Senate, on a 23-16 vote, just passed legislation ENDING Disney’s tax privilege, self-governing power & special exemption status.

— Tim Swain (@SwainForSenate) April 20, 2022

---

NYTimes
Gov. Ron DeSantis clears a way to revoke Disney's special district in Florida.
The Florida Senate approved a move to end Disney World's self-governing privileges starting next year.

In a move widely seen as retaliation, Gov. Ron DeSantis asked Florida lawmakers on Tuesday to consider the "termination" of self-governing privileges that Disney World has held in the Orlando area for 55 years. He acted after Disney, the state's largest private employer, paused political donations in Florida and condemned a new state education law that opponents call "Don't Say Gay."
On Wednesday, the Florida Senate voted 23 to 16 to revoke the privileges starting in June of next year. The Florida House must now take up the measure.
The potential impact on Disney World is unclear. The privileges exempt the resort from certain regulations and fees.
The Florida Legislature had already been scheduled to convene this week for a special session on congressional redistricting. On Tuesday, Mr. DeSantis, a Republican, issued a proclamation allowing the Republican-controlled body to also take up bills that would eliminate special tax districts that were created before 1968.

---

Disney maintained its own roads. (Mothra: that's a Libertarian thing.)

If this is retaliation let's see if the state can match the Disney level of infrastructure maintenance. Or don't chooses not to.