quash said:

---

Mothra said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Mothra said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

quash said:

---

Government idea cancels. What could go wrong?

---

Maybe we should have Hustler as reading material for 2nd graders too?

Nobody cancelled an idea. If you can't teach Kindergarteners about gay sex we are burning books? Getting a little extreme.

Funny, it is ok to raise the age to own a gun to 25 to defend yourself, but when discussing homosexualuty we are barbarians if we don't instruct our K-3? You really don't see something wrong with that???

---

I have a real problem with states banning ideas. Do you want states to have the power to force pronouns on you? You don't see something wrong with that?

Meanwhile I think we can rely on the laws we have that allow parents to question these things. Unfortunately we burden the districts with both legit claims and those of that Karen at Lake Travis. Better that than state action. Texas could turn blue again and copy Gov. Abbot's massive use of EOs. I'd rather states not abuse their power. It's a Libertarian thing.

---

Gov't putting limits on itself, its entities and its employees is very much a Libertarian thing. You keep treating public schools as private business and state teachers as private employees. That's not correct

---

I never said anything like that. What an odd response.

---

You don't have to say it out loud to treat it as such and you know it.

Your original post is odd.

So, I guess you'd support K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

Why do you get to just make up stuff like it's real?

---

So, would you be for K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

I think K-3 should be reading.

---

About homosexual sex and transgenderism?

---

Dick & Dick or Jane and Jane?

How Dick becomes Jane?

Dick and Spot? (Open minded???)

Dick thinks he's Jane?

Jane want to be Dick?

"Dick dresses as Jane vs Dick becomes Jane: a tudorial" plus coloring book

Jane likes purple, so why can't I be Dick?

Just to show the level of conversation of what we are talking about here....

Not that there's anything wrong with it....

Ok, we will take Spot out of it, cheap shot.

---

Apparently, quash believes allowing teachers to teach kindergartners about gay sex is libertarian.

Only in quash's warped world.

---

Apparently? Based on what? Try to be specific for once

---

BREAKING: Chief Bush-Cheney advisor: "If Jesus Christ was alive today, he would be called a groomer" pic.twitter.com/6he4MCIKhM

— Jack Posobiec ☦️ (@JackPosobiec) April 20, 2022

The public school system has a child sex abuse problem. Here are your Predators of the Week: pic.twitter.com/OhTESEdACd

— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) April 20, 2022

A smug @NicolleDWallace accuses Governors Ron DeSantis and Glenn Youngkin of "dehumanization" and compares them to "Russians [who] get their soldiers to rape children." pic.twitter.com/cwRTPERk6Z

— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) April 20, 2022

Cobretti said:

---

A former press secretary for the Bernie Sanders presidential campaign is cheering on mega corporation lobbyists. This is what the left is now. It was always about power. https://t.co/Ga806ODRSS

— Jarrett Stepman (@JarrettStepman) April 20, 2022

---

quash said:

---

Mothra said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Mothra said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

quash said:

---

Government idea cancels. What could go wrong?

---

Maybe we should have Hustler as reading material for 2nd graders too?

Nobody cancelled an idea. If you can't teach Kindergarteners about gay sex we are burning books? Getting a little extreme.

Funny, it is ok to raise the age to own a gun to 25 to defend yourself, but when discussing homosexualuty we are barbarians if we don't instruct our K-3? You really don't see something wrong with that???

---

I have a real problem with states banning ideas. Do you want states to have the power to force pronouns on you? You don't see something wrong with that?

Meanwhile I think we can rely on the laws we have that allow parents to question these things. Unfortunately we burden the districts with both legit claims and those of that Karen at Lake Travis. Better that than state action. Texas could turn blue again and copy Gov. Abbot's massive use of EOs. I'd rather states not abuse their power. It's a Libertarian thing.

---

Gov't putting limits on itself, its entities and its employees is very much a Libertarian thing. You keep treating public schools as private business and state teachers as private employees. That's not correct

---

I never said anything like that. What an odd response.

---

You don't have to say it out loud to treat it as such and you know it.

Your original post is odd.

So, I guess you'd support K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

Why do you get to just make up stuff like it's real?

---

So, would you be for K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

I think K-3 should be reading.

---

About homosexual sex and transgenderism?

---

Dick & Dick or Jane and Jane?

How Dick becomes Jane?

Dick and Spot? (Open minded???)

Dick thinks he's Jane?

Jane want to be Dick?

"Dick dresses as Jane vs Dick becomes Jane: a tudorial" plus coloring book

Jane likes purple, so why can't I be Dick?

Just to show the level of conversation of what we are talking about here....

Not that there's anything wrong with it....

Ok, we will take Spot out of it, cheap shot.

---

Apparently, quash believes allowing teachers to teach kindergartners about gay sex is libertarian.

Only in quash's warped world.

---

Apparently? Based on what? Try to be specific for once

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Is it possible he was only talking about banning ideas in public school, not the whole society?

---

This is about school curriculum and teachers teaching adult level concepts to K-3, not the ideas. I am really shocked that some are against waiting until kids are older to get into sex ed...

---

I'm not against it. Let's just be honest. It is a ban on certain ideas in certain classrooms, and rightly so.

---

I think the piece your missing is the age. Nobody is saying that Middle School and High School kids that have these questions shouldn't be able to find help to understand. Only keep it age appropriate.

I would also like to see a more balanced, medical approach, not just blind acceptance that anything you feel at 14 is correct or more importantly will be the way you always feel. I can think of a lot of bad decisions 14 year olds can make if left to their own devices!

Others may and will disagree with me.

---

Florida is prohibiting the communication of an idea (transgenderism, gender fluidity) to students in 3rd grade and under. This is good thing and I see nothing wrong with it. But it is prohibiting the communication of an idea to public school students.

What's wrong with saying the bill prohibits the communication of ideas. It is a good bill

---

Because "banning ideas" is a broad term with negative connotations that doesn't apply here.

---

Mothra said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Is it possible he was only talking about banning ideas in public school, not the whole society?

---

This is about school curriculum and teachers teaching adult level concepts to K-3, not the ideas. I am really shocked that some are against waiting until kids are older to get into sex ed...

---

I'm not against it. Let's just be honest. It is a ban on certain ideas in certain classrooms, and rightly so.

---

I think the piece your missing is the age. Nobody is saying that Middle School and High School kids that have these questions shouldn't be able to find help to understand. Only keep it age appropriate.

I would also like to see a more balanced, medical approach, not just blind acceptance that anything you feel at 14 is correct or more importantly will be the way you always feel. I can think of a lot of bad decisions 14 year olds can make if left to their own devices!

Others may and will disagree with me.

---

Florida is prohibiting the communication of an idea (transgenderism, gender fluidity) to students in 3rd grade and under. This is good thing and I see nothing wrong with it. But it is prohibiting the communication of an idea to public school students.

What's wrong with saying the bill prohibits the communication of ideas. It is a good bill

---

Because "banning ideas" is a broad term with negative connotations that doesn't apply here.

---

Well, that settles it. If it has bad connotations then it must be a lie.

---

There are a number of reasons that term is not accurate, your selective reading not withstanding.

---

Mothra said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Is it possible he was only talking about banning ideas in public school, not the whole society?

---

This is about school curriculum and teachers teaching adult level concepts to K-3, not the ideas. I am really shocked that some are against waiting until kids are older to get into sex ed...

---

I'm not against it. Let's just be honest. It is a ban on certain ideas in certain classrooms, and rightly so.

---

I think the piece your missing is the age. Nobody is saying that Middle School and High School kids that have these questions shouldn't be able to find help to understand. Only keep it age appropriate.

I would also like to see a more balanced, medical approach, not just blind acceptance that anything you feel at 14 is correct or more importantly will be the way you always feel. I can think of a lot of bad decisions 14 year olds can make if left to their own devices!

Others may and will disagree with me.

---

Florida is prohibiting the communication of an idea (transgenderism, gender fluidity) to students in 3rd grade and under. This is good thing and I see nothing wrong with it. But it is prohibiting the communication of an idea to public school students.

What's wrong with saying the bill prohibits the communication of ideas. It is a good bill

---

Because "banning ideas" is a broad term with negative connotations that doesn't apply here.

---

Well, that settles it. If it has bad connotations then it must be a lie.

---

There are a number of reasons that term is not accurate, your selective reading not withstanding.

---

The fact that you chose to interpret it in an absurdly broad sense doesn't mean it's necessarily a "broad term." There are narrowly tailored bans, of which this is obviously one.

---

The fact that you chose to interpret it absurdly narrow, and ignore the message he was conveying, isn't a surprise.

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Is it possible he was only talking about banning ideas in public school, not the whole society?

---

This is about school curriculum and teachers teaching adult level concepts to K-3, not the ideas. I am really shocked that some are against waiting until kids are older to get into sex ed...

---

I'm not against it. Let's just be honest. It is a ban on certain ideas in certain classrooms, and rightly so.

---

I think the piece your missing is the age. Nobody is saying that Middle School and High School kids that have these questions shouldn't be able to find help to understand. Only keep it age appropriate.

I would also like to see a more balanced, medical approach, not just blind acceptance that anything you feel at 14 is correct or more importantly will be the way you always feel. I can think of a lot of bad decisions 14 year olds can make if left to their own devices!

Others may and will disagree with me.

---

Florida is prohibiting the communication of an idea (transgenderism, gender fluidity) to students in 3rd grade and under. This is good thing and I see nothing wrong with it. But it is prohibiting the communication of an idea to public school students.

What's wrong with saying the bill prohibits the communication of ideas. It is a good bill

---

Because "banning ideas" is a broad term with negative connotations that doesn't apply here.

---

Well, that settles it. If it has bad connotations then it must be a lie.

---

There are a number of reasons that term is not accurate, your selective reading not withstanding.

---

The fact that you chose to interpret it in an absurdly broad sense doesn't mean it's necessarily a "broad term." There are narrowly tailored bans, of which this is obviously one.

---

The fact that you chose to interpret it absurdly narrow, and ignore the message he was conveying, isn't a surprise.

---

And when you say "message," you mean the connotation that hurt your feelings.

---

Mothra said:

---

quash said:

---

Mothra said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Mothra said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

quash said:

---

Government idea cancels. What could go wrong?

---

Maybe we should have Hustler as reading material for 2nd graders too?

Nobody cancelled an idea. If you can't teach Kindergarteners about gay sex we are burning books? Getting a little extreme.

Funny, it is ok to raise the age to own a gun to 25 to defend yourself, but when discussing homosexualuty we are barbarians if we don't instruct our K-3? You really don't see something wrong with that???

---

I have a real problem with states banning ideas. Do you want states to have the power to force pronouns on you? You don't see something wrong with that?

Meanwhile I think we can rely on the laws we have that allow parents to question these things. Unfortunately we burden the districts with both legit claims and those of that Karen at Lake Travis. Better that than state action. Texas could turn blue again and copy Gov. Abbot's massive use of EOs. I'd rather states not abuse their power. It's a Libertarian thing.

---

Gov't putting limits on itself, its entities and its employees is very much a Libertarian thing. You keep treating public schools as private business and state teachers as private employees. That's not correct

---

I never said anything like that. What an odd response.

---

You don't have to say it out loud to treat it as such and you know it.

Your original post is odd.

So, I guess you'd support K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

Why do you get to just make up stuff like it's real?

---

So, would you be for K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

I think K-3 should be reading.

---

About homosexual sex and transgenderism?

---

Dick & Dick or Jane and Jane?

How Dick becomes Jane?

Dick and Spot? (Open minded???)

Dick thinks he's Jane?

Jane want to be Dick?

"Dick dresses as Jane vs Dick becomes Jane: a tudorial" plus coloring book

Jane likes purple, so why can't I be Dick?

Just to show the level of conversation of what we are talking about here....

Not that there's anything wrong with it....

Ok, we will take Spot out of it, cheap shot.

---

Apparently, quash believes allowing teachers to teach kindergartners about gay sex is libertarian.

Only in quash's warped world.

---

Apparently? Based on what? Try to be specific for once

---

So you admit your position is not libertarian? Interesting.

---

quash said:

---

Mothra said:

---

quash said:

---

Mothra said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Mothra said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

quash said:

---

Government idea cancels. What could go wrong?

---

Maybe we should have Hustler as reading material for 2nd graders too?

Nobody cancelled an idea. %A0If you can't teach Kindergarteners about gay sex we are burning books? %A0Getting a little extreme.

Funny, it is ok to raise the age to own a gun to 25 to defend yourself, but when discussing homosexualuty we are barbarians if we don't instruct our K-3? %A0You really don't see something wrong with that???

---

I have a real problem with states banning ideas. Do you want states to have the power to force pronouns on you? You don't see something wrong with that?

Meanwhile I think we can rely on the laws we have that allow parents to question these things. Unfortunately we burden the districts with both legit claims and those of that Karen at Lake Travis. Better that than state action. Texas could turn blue again and copy Gov. Abbot's massive use of EOs. I'd rather states not abuse their power. It's a Libertarian thing.

---

Gov't putting limits on itself, its entities and its employees is very much a Libertarian thing. You keep treating public schools as private business and state teachers as private employees. That's not correct

---

I never said anything like that. What an odd response.

---

You don't have to say it out loud to treat it as such and you know it.

Your original post is odd.

So, I guess you'd support K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

Why do you get to just make up stuff like it's real?

---

So, would you be for K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

I think K-3 should be reading.

---

About homosexual sex and transgenderism?

---

Dick & Dick or Jane and Jane?

How Dick becomes Jane?

Dick and Spot? (Open minded???)

Dick thinks he's Jane?

Jane want to be Dick?

"Dick dresses as Jane vs Dick becomes Jane: a tudorial" plus coloring book

Jane likes purple, so why can't I be Dick?

Just to show the level of conversation of what we are talking about here....

Not that there's anything wrong with it....

Ok, we will take Spot out of it, cheap shot.

---

Apparently, quash believes allowing teachers to teach kindergartners about gay sex is libertarian.

Only in quash's warped %A0world.

---

Apparently? Based on what? Try to be specific for once

---

So you admit your position is not libertarian? %A0Interesting.

---

So you can't? As usual.

Boring.

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Mothra said:

---

quash said:

---

Mothra said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Mothra said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

quash said:

---

Government idea cancels. What could go wrong?

---

Maybe we should have Hustler as reading material for 2nd graders too?

Nobody cancelled an idea. %A0If you can't teach Kindergarteners about gay sex we are burning books? %A0Getting a little extreme.

Funny, it is ok to raise the age to own a gun to 25 to defend yourself, but when discussing homosexualuty we are barbarians if we don't instruct our K-3? %A0You really don't see something wrong with that???

---

I have a real problem with states banning ideas. Do you want states to have the power to force pronouns on you? You don't see something wrong with that?

Meanwhile I think we can rely on the laws we have that allow parents to question these things. Unfortunately we burden the districts with both legit claims and those of that Karen at Lake Travis. Better that than state action. Texas could turn blue again and copy Gov. Abbot's massive use of EOs. I'd rather states not abuse their power. It's a Libertarian thing.

---

Gov't putting limits on itself, its entities and its employees is very much a Libertarian thing. You keep treating public schools as private business and state teachers as private employees. That's not correct

---

I never said anything like that. What an odd response.

---

You don't have to say it out loud to treat it as such and you know it.

Your original post is odd.

So, I guess you'd support K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

Why do you get to just make up stuff like it's real?

---

So, would you be for K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

I think K-3 should be reading.

---

About homosexual sex and transgenderism?

---

Dick & Dick or Jane and Jane?

How Dick becomes Jane?

Dick and Spot? (Open minded???)

Dick thinks he's Jane?

Jane want to be Dick?

"Dick dresses as Jane vs Dick becomes Jane: a tudorial" plus coloring book

Jane likes purple, so why can't I be Dick?

Just to show the level of conversation of what we are talking about here....

Not that there's anything wrong with it....

Ok, we will take Spot out of it, cheap shot.

---

Apparently, quash believes allowing teachers to teach kindergartners about gay sex is libertarian.

Only in quash's warped %A0world.

---

Apparently? Based on what? Try to be specific for once

---

So you admit your position is not libertarian? %A0Interesting.

---

So you can't? As usual.

Boring.

---

So, would you be for K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

Canon said:

---

quash said:

---

Mothra said:

---

quash said:

---

Mothra said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Mothra said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

quash said:

---

Government idea cancels. What could go wrong?

---

Maybe we should have Hustler as reading material for 2nd graders too?

Nobody cancelled an idea. If you can't teach Kindergarteners about gay sex we are burning books? Getting a little extreme.

Funny, it is ok to raise the age to own a gun to 25 to defend yourself, but when discussing homosexualuty we are barbarians if we don't instruct our K-3? You really don't see something wrong with that???

---

I have a real problem with states banning ideas. Do you want states to have the power to force pronouns on you? You don't see something wrong with that?

Meanwhile I think we can rely on the laws we have that allow parents to question these things. Unfortunately we burden the districts with both legit claims and those of that Karen at Lake Travis. Better that than state action. Texas could turn blue again and copy Gov. Abbot's massive use of EOs. I'd rather states not abuse their power. It's a Libertarian thing.

---

Gov't putting limits on itself, its entities and its employees is very much a Libertarian thing. You keep treating public schools as private business and state teachers as private employees. That's not correct

---

I never said anything like that. What an odd response.

---

You don't have to say it out loud to treat it as such and you know it.

Your original post is odd.

So, I guess you'd support K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

Why do you get to just make up stuff like it's real?

---

So, would you be for K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

I think K-3 should be reading.

---

About homosexual sex and transgenderism?

---

Dick & Dick or Jane and Jane?

How Dick becomes Jane?

Dick and Spot? (Open minded???)

Dick thinks he's Jane?

Jane want to be Dick?

"Dick dresses as Jane vs Dick becomes Jane: a tudorial" plus coloring book

Jane likes purple, so why can't I be Dick?

Just to show the level of conversation of what we are talking about here....

Not that there's anything wrong with it....

Ok, we will take Spot out of it, cheap shot.

---

Apparently, quash believes allowing teachers to teach kindergartners about gay sex is libertarian.

Only in quash's warped world.

---

Apparently? Based on what? Try to be specific for once

---

So you admit your position is not libertarian? Interesting.

---

So you can't? As usual.

Boring.

---

Ok, groomer.

---

quash said:

---

Mothra said:

---

quash said:

---

Mothra said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Mothra said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

quash said:

---

Government idea cancels. What could go wrong?

---

Maybe we should have Hustler as reading material for 2nd graders too?

Nobody cancelled an idea. %A0If you can't teach Kindergarteners about gay sex we are burning books? %A0Getting a little extreme.

Funny, it is ok to raise the age to own a gun to 25 to defend yourself, but when discussing homosexualuty we are barbarians if we don't instruct our K-3? %A0You really don't see something wrong with that???

---

I have a real problem with states banning ideas. Do you want states to have the power to force pronouns on you? You don't see something wrong with that?

Meanwhile I think we can rely on the laws we have that allow parents to question these things. Unfortunately we burden the districts with both legit claims and those of that Karen at Lake Travis. Better that than state action. Texas could turn blue again and copy Gov. Abbot's massive use of EOs. I'd rather states not abuse their power. It's a Libertarian thing.

---

Gov't putting limits on itself, its entities and its employees is very much a Libertarian thing. You keep treating public schools as private business and state teachers as private employees. That's not correct

---

I never said anything like that. What an odd response.

---

You don't have to say it out loud to treat it as such and you know it.

Your original post is odd.

So, I guess you'd support K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

Why do you get to just make up stuff like it's real?

---

So, would you be for K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

I think K-3 should be reading.

---

About homosexual sex and transgenderism?

---

Dick & Dick or Jane and Jane?

How Dick becomes Jane?

Dick and Spot? (Open minded???)

Dick thinks he's Jane?

Jane want to be Dick?

"Dick dresses as Jane vs Dick becomes Jane: a tudorial" plus coloring book

Jane likes purple, so why can't I be Dick?

Just to show the level of conversation of what we are talking about here....

Not that there's anything wrong with it....

Ok, we will take Spot out of it, cheap shot.

---

Apparently, quash believes allowing teachers to teach kindergartners about gay sex is libertarian.

Only in quash's warped %A0world.

---

Apparently? Based on what? Try to be specific for once

---

So you admit your position is not libertarian? %A0Interesting.

---

So you can't? As usual.

Boring.

---

BearFan33 said:

---

quash said:

---

Canon said:

---

quash said:

---

Mothra said:

---

quash said:

---

Mothra said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Mothra said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

quash said:

---

Government idea cancels. What could go wrong?

---

Maybe we should have Hustler as reading material for 2nd graders too?

Nobody cancelled an idea. If you can't teach Kindergarteners about gay sex we are burning books? Getting a little extreme.

Funny, it is ok to raise the age to own a gun to 25 to defend yourself, but when discussing homosexualuty we are barbarians if we don't instruct our K-3? You really don't see something wrong with that???

---

I have a real problem with states banning ideas. Do you want states to have the power to force pronouns on you? You don't see something wrong with that?

Meanwhile I think we can rely on the laws we have that allow parents to question these things. Unfortunately we burden the districts with both legit claims and those of that Karen at Lake Travis. Better that than state action. Texas could turn blue again and copy Gov. Abbot's massive use of EOs. I'd rather states not abuse their power. It's a Libertarian thing.

---

Gov't putting limits on itself, its entities and its employees is very much a Libertarian thing. You keep treating public schools as private business and state teachers as private employees. That's not correct

---

I never said anything like that. What an odd response.

---

You don't have to say it out loud to treat it as such and you know it.

Your original post is odd.

So, I guess you'd support K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

Why do you get to just make up stuff like it's real?

---

So, would you be for K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

I think K-3 should be reading.

---

About homosexual sex and transgenderism?

---

Dick & Dick or Jane and Jane?

How Dick becomes Jane?

Dick and Spot? (Open minded???)

Dick thinks he's Jane?

Jane want to be Dick?

"Dick dresses as Jane vs Dick becomes Jane: a tudorial" plus coloring book

Jane likes purple, so why can't I be Dick?

Just to show the level of conversation of what we are talking about here....

Not that there's anything wrong with it....

Ok, we will take Spot out of it, cheap shot.

---

Apparently, quash believes allowing teachers to teach kindergartners about gay sex is libertarian.

Only in quash's warped world.

---

Apparently? Based on what? Try to be specific for once

---

So you admit your position is not libertarian? Interesting.

---

So you can't? As usual.

Boring.

---

Ok, groomer.

---

Grooming is a real thing, a despicable thing, employed by predators.

By employing the same terminology in an internet debate because somebody disagrees with you is just... Canonish.

---

It's kind of like labeling anyone that disagrees with you a racist, Nazi or homophobe right?

---

quash said:

---

Canon said:

---

quash said:

---

Mothra said:

---

quash said:

---

Mothra said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Mothra said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

quash said:

---

Government idea cancels. What could go wrong?

---

Maybe we should have Hustler as reading material for 2nd graders too?

Nobody cancelled an idea. If you can't teach Kindergarteners about gay sex we are burning books? Getting a little extreme.

Funny, it is ok to raise the age to own a gun to 25 to defend yourself, but when discussing homosexualuty we are barbarians if we don't instruct our K-3? You really don't see something wrong with that???

---

I have a real problem with states banning ideas. Do you want states to have the power to force pronouns on you? You don't see something wrong with that?

Meanwhile I think we can rely on the laws we have that allow parents to question these things. Unfortunately we burden the districts with both legit claims and those of that Karen at Lake Travis. Better that than state action. Texas could turn blue again and copy Gov. Abbot's massive use of EOs. I'd rather states not abuse their power. It's a Libertarian thing.

---

Gov't putting limits on itself, its entities and its employees is very much a Libertarian thing. You keep treating public schools as private business and state teachers as private employees. That's not correct

---

I never said anything like that. What an odd response.

---

You don't have to say it out loud to treat it as such and you know it.

Your original post is odd.

So, I guess you'd support K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

Why do you get to just make up stuff like it's real?

---

So, would you be for K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

I think K-3 should be reading.

---

About homosexual sex and transgenderism?

---

Dick & Dick or Jane and Jane?

How Dick becomes Jane?

Dick and Spot? (Open minded???)

Dick thinks he's Jane?

Jane want to be Dick?

"Dick dresses as Jane vs Dick becomes Jane: a tudorial" plus coloring book

Jane likes purple, so why can't I be Dick?

Just to show the level of conversation of what we are talking about here....

Not that there's anything wrong with it....

Ok, we will take Spot out of it, cheap shot.

---

Apparently, quash believes allowing teachers to teach kindergartners about gay sex is libertarian.

Only in quash's warped world.

---

Apparently? Based on what? Try to be specific for once

---

So you admit your position is not libertarian? Interesting.

---

So you can't? As usual.

Boring.

---

Ok, groomer.

---

Grooming is a real thing, a despicable thing, employed by predators.

By employing the same terminology in an internet debate because somebody disagrees with you is just... Canonish.

---

ATL Bear said:

---

If defining age appropriate curriculum material is "banning ideas", then there is an entire litany of mathematics, science, and literature "ideas" that are currently banned. Really not a difficult concept to grasp unless you think government employees and not parents need to be more involved in the sexual identities of 4-8 year olds.

---

BearFan33 said:

---

quash said:

---

Canon said:

---

quash said:

---

Mothra said:

---

quash said:

---

Mothra said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Mothra said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

quash said:

---

Government idea cancels. What could go wrong?

---

Maybe we should have Hustler as reading material for 2nd graders too?

Nobody cancelled an idea. If you can't teach Kindergarteners about gay sex we are burning books? Getting a little extreme.

Funny, it is ok to raise the age to own a gun to 25 to defend yourself, but when discussing homosexualuty we are barbarians if we don't instruct our K-3? You really don't see something wrong with that???

---

I have a real problem with states banning ideas. Do you want states to have the power to force pronouns on you? You don't see something wrong with that?

Meanwhile I think we can rely on the laws we have that allow parents to question these things. Unfortunately we burden the districts with both legit claims and those of that Karen at Lake Travis. Better that than state action. Texas could turn blue again and copy Gov. Abbot's massive use of EOs. I'd rather states not abuse their power. It's a Libertarian thing.

---

Gov't putting limits on itself, its entities and its employees is very much a Libertarian thing. You keep treating public schools as private business and state teachers as private employees. That's not correct

---

I never said anything like that. What an odd response.

---

You don't have to say it out loud to treat it as such and you know it.

Your original post is odd.

So, I guess you'd support K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

Why do you get to just make up stuff like it's real?

---

So, would you be for K-3 teachers in public school discussing and teaching the bible and Jesus Christ?

---

I think K-3 should be reading.

---

About homosexual sex and transgenderism?

---

Dick & Dick or Jane and Jane?

How Dick becomes Jane?

Dick and Spot? (Open minded???)

Dick thinks he's Jane?

Jane want to be Dick?

"Dick dresses as Jane vs Dick becomes Jane: a tudorial" plus coloring book

Jane likes purple, so why can't I be Dick?

Just to show the level of conversation of what we are talking about here....

Not that there's anything wrong with it....

Ok, we will take Spot out of it, cheap shot.

---

Apparently, quash believes allowing teachers to teach kindergartners about gay sex is libertarian.

Only in quash's warped world.

---

Apparently? Based on what? Try to be specific for once

---

So you admit your position is not libertarian? Interesting.

---

So you can't? As usual.

Boring.

---

Ok, groomer.

---

Grooming is a real thing, a despicable thing, employed by predators.

By employing the same terminology in an internet debate because somebody disagrees with you is just... Canonish.

---

It's kind of like labeling anyone that disagrees with you a racist, Nazi or homophobe right?

---

ATL Bear said:

---

quash said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

If defining age appropriate curriculum material is "banning ideas", then there is an entire litany of mathematics, science, and literature "ideas" that are currently banned. Really not a difficult concept to grasp unless you think government employees and not parents need to be more involved in the sexual identities of 4-8 year olds.

---

And prior to this law the age appropriate concepts were already being taught. But individuals, being people, cross the line from time to time. Prior to this law those teachers were rebuked or fired at the local level.

But ever since Team Karen put on a red jersey we have to pass state laws banning specific ideas. Karen now dictates how we talk about race, gender, etc.

And she will show up in a blue jersey one of these days and y'all will start keening about cancel culture. Again

---

No ideas were banned. They were moved down the curriculum spectrum. They also dictate which and what mathematics you teach, scientific material you introduce, and literary concepts you employ.

Let's stop overreacting to the emotionalism of "I can't talk about my partner".

---