A minister from a bonafide School of Theology would not make that contextual mistake you just did, Waco.Waco1947 said:Galatians 3:28Forest Bueller_bf said:He could have quoted Jesus from Matthew 19:4 has he wished.cms186 said:a couple of takes from this, and please note, when i say "you", i mean it in the plural sense, not you personally, but you seem to talk a lot about the bible, but whenever there is a problematic point in the Old Testament (and there are several) you always say that you are a New Testament Christian, but you always pick and choose the bits from the Old Testament which suit your particular Agenda.historian said:
"So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them." Genesis 1:27
There are no other options.
Ignoring that though, if you accept this particular quotation at face value and hold it as a honest belief, then surely you must be against any kind of Body Altering surgery? isnt that messing with Gods image? If God wanted you to have a Flat Chest or Wonky Teeth, or a Cleft Palate, or Astigmatism, shouldnt you then accept Gods image as it is and not cut off (or inject substances into) whatever parts of your body you want to?
Verse 4: "Have you not read that from the beginning he made them male and female?
It's not really an Old vs. New Testament issue.
New International Version
28 There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
Paul erases sexuality and Jesus never asks about about someone sexuality.
Bigots apparently don't like facts and prefer grooming children:Waco1947 said:
Of course the AMA is a lobbying group but they are medical experts first and foremost and they make clear their medical reasons for their stance. Bigots apparently don't like facts and prefer name calling and red herrings.
He spent more time studying child porn than Scripture.Oldbear83 said:A minister from a bonafide School of Theology would not make that contextual mistake you just did, Waco.Waco1947 said:Galatians 3:28Forest Bueller_bf said:He could have quoted Jesus from Matthew 19:4 has he wished.cms186 said:a couple of takes from this, and please note, when i say "you", i mean it in the plural sense, not you personally, but you seem to talk a lot about the bible, but whenever there is a problematic point in the Old Testament (and there are several) you always say that you are a New Testament Christian, but you always pick and choose the bits from the Old Testament which suit your particular Agenda.historian said:
"So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them." Genesis 1:27
There are no other options.
Ignoring that though, if you accept this particular quotation at face value and hold it as a honest belief, then surely you must be against any kind of Body Altering surgery? isnt that messing with Gods image? If God wanted you to have a Flat Chest or Wonky Teeth, or a Cleft Palate, or Astigmatism, shouldnt you then accept Gods image as it is and not cut off (or inject substances into) whatever parts of your body you want to?
Verse 4: "Have you not read that from the beginning he made them male and female?
It's not really an Old vs. New Testament issue.
New International Version
28 There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
Paul erases sexuality and Jesus never asks about about someone sexuality.
Just another practice and procedure advocated by the medical experts of the day, joining a long list including bloodletting, eugenics, forced sterilizations, frontal lobotomies.....Waco1947 said:
Of course the AMA is a lobbying group but they are medical experts first and foremost and they make clear their medical reasons for their stance. Bigots apparently don't like facts and prefer name calling and red herrings.
Should anorexics be treated or affirmed?Waco1947 said:Explain why it is evil?Redbrickbear said:Titus and Titus said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Money
Read this and learn.
My God man….that was hard to read.
Those poor boys.
Gender ideology is evil…always has been.
Another rotten fruit of the sexual revolution and the LGBTQ movement.
Waco1947 said:Absolutely a stupid misrepresentation of of the AMA.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:The AMA is a political and advocacy group, not a scientific organization. Only 12% of practicing physicians are members of the AMA. They do not speak for the vast majority of doctors.Waco1947 said:The American medical association is my source of the science not your predujudice. Get real your facts and logic.D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:
Not a misperception. You are intelligent DC but when it to to human sexuality you need an education in human sexuality.
You have a misinterpretation of scripture and sexuality. Your doctrine is getting in the way of your literacy about these issues. You call it mind reading on my but the fact is -- you call them delusional and abnormal.
It is hard to discuss with someone who apparently refuses to get educated.
It is harder still to discuss with someone who randomly claims that I have my views on individuals who mistakenly believe they are the opposite sex because I don't understand scripture properly when I am not using scripture at all in forming my views.
Again, we can scientifically identify whether a human being is male or female. If a human male says he is actually female then he is clearly wrong about that factual assertion. So, yeah, it is not normal for a human male to believe that he is actually a human female. This is no different from a human believing that he or she is a dog or a cat. There is nothing about scripture or doctrine or sexuality in this statement. This is simply logic. You are speaking out of ignorance about human sexuality and gender identity..
You like to accuse me of hating people. That is a false accusation. If you have friends or family members with a serious mental illness, it does not mean that you do not value them or love them to say that they are delusional or abnormal.
You like to accuse me of being "uneducated" on these issues. You know nothing of my knowledge of human sexuality. It seems that you believe that if some doesn't hate people and is educated then they cannot disagree with you. That is both incredibly arrogant and incredibly shallow on your part.
I hate to break it to you, but it is possible to not hate people, to be quite knowledgeable and educated on the topic and still not agree with you.
Do you disagree that it is scientifically rather routine to determine someone's sex? Certainly this is true in percentages in the very high 90s.
Again, if someone who is a male is actually a female, then it is not an injustice to women for him to compete in athletics against them.
If he is not actually female, then he is experiencing some kind of delusional thinking to believe that he is female.
You say it is "probably" unjust for women to be forced to compete against men. It follows logically (not theologically) because I "hate" someone, that it is also "probably," according to you, deluded thinking on his part to think that his actual sex is female.
......
DC, you speak out of ignorance
This small minority of doctors are usually ones who are advocating for their particular medical field, and since transgender affirming care is a money making business, it's really no surprise that the ones who make money off of it would would join together and try to throw their opinion behind the weight of the authoritative-sounding "American Medical Association" title in order to fool ignorant people like yourself that their opinion is a medical consensus.
I'll bet you're the kind of person that believes those "Best Doctors Lists" in magazines are actually the area's best doctors, and not just a scheme to advertise or sell more of the magazine's plaques. I have bad news for you.
So Paul "erases sexuality"? I guess he also erases Jews, Gentiles, slaves and free people?Waco1947 said:Galatians 3:28Forest Bueller_bf said:He could have quoted Jesus from Matthew 19:4 has he wished.cms186 said:a couple of takes from this, and please note, when i say "you", i mean it in the plural sense, not you personally, but you seem to talk a lot about the bible, but whenever there is a problematic point in the Old Testament (and there are several) you always say that you are a New Testament Christian, but you always pick and choose the bits from the Old Testament which suit your particular Agenda.historian said:
"So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them." Genesis 1:27
There are no other options.
Ignoring that though, if you accept this particular quotation at face value and hold it as a honest belief, then surely you must be against any kind of Body Altering surgery? isnt that messing with Gods image? If God wanted you to have a Flat Chest or Wonky Teeth, or a Cleft Palate, or Astigmatism, shouldnt you then accept Gods image as it is and not cut off (or inject substances into) whatever parts of your body you want to?
Verse 4: "Have you not read that from the beginning he made them male and female?
It's not really an Old vs. New Testament issue.
New International Version
28 There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
Paul erases sexuality and Jesus never asks about about someone sexuality.
You are completely misuing this verse for your political agenda. He is simple saying "In Him", as believers in Christ, we all are one, born of the one Spirit. The Holy Spirit. It is proclaiming, God is not a respector of persons, but we are all of equal value in Christ Jesus.Waco1947 said:Galatians 3:28Forest Bueller_bf said:He could have quoted Jesus from Matthew 19:4 has he wished.cms186 said:a couple of takes from this, and please note, when i say "you", i mean it in the plural sense, not you personally, but you seem to talk a lot about the bible, but whenever there is a problematic point in the Old Testament (and there are several) you always say that you are a New Testament Christian, but you always pick and choose the bits from the Old Testament which suit your particular Agenda.historian said:
"So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them." Genesis 1:27
There are no other options.
Ignoring that though, if you accept this particular quotation at face value and hold it as a honest belief, then surely you must be against any kind of Body Altering surgery? isnt that messing with Gods image? If God wanted you to have a Flat Chest or Wonky Teeth, or a Cleft Palate, or Astigmatism, shouldnt you then accept Gods image as it is and not cut off (or inject substances into) whatever parts of your body you want to?
Verse 4: "Have you not read that from the beginning he made them male and female?
It's not really an Old vs. New Testament issue.
New International Version
28 There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
Paul erases sexuality and Jesus never asks about about someone sexuality.
and let's be clear here...Forest Bueller_bf said:You are completely misuing this verse for your political agenda. He is simple saying "In Him", as believers in Christ, we all are one, born of the one Spirit. The Holy Spirit. It is proclaiming, God is not a respector of persons, but we are all of equal value in Christ Jesus.Waco1947 said:Galatians 3:28Forest Bueller_bf said:He could have quoted Jesus from Matthew 19:4 has he wished.cms186 said:a couple of takes from this, and please note, when i say "you", i mean it in the plural sense, not you personally, but you seem to talk a lot about the bible, but whenever there is a problematic point in the Old Testament (and there are several) you always say that you are a New Testament Christian, but you always pick and choose the bits from the Old Testament which suit your particular Agenda.historian said:
"So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them." Genesis 1:27
There are no other options.
Ignoring that though, if you accept this particular quotation at face value and hold it as a honest belief, then surely you must be against any kind of Body Altering surgery? isnt that messing with Gods image? If God wanted you to have a Flat Chest or Wonky Teeth, or a Cleft Palate, or Astigmatism, shouldnt you then accept Gods image as it is and not cut off (or inject substances into) whatever parts of your body you want to?
Verse 4: "Have you not read that from the beginning he made them male and female?
It's not really an Old vs. New Testament issue.
New International Version
28 There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
Paul erases sexuality and Jesus never asks about about someone sexuality.
This has nothing to do with the fact He made us Male and Female only physically. You cannot literally be this ignorant of the meaning of this scripture.
they should be fed a sandwichScottS said:
Should anorexics be treated or affirmed?
Preferably from Arby's of Chik-fil-A.ShooterTX said:they should be fed a sandwichScottS said:
Should anorexics be treated or affirmed?
My 3rd son was just born, and this is how we were welcomed to the Kaiser postpartum unit. pic.twitter.com/TuFWpDvPPM
— Jordan Henry (@irrationalhenry) April 2, 2024
that is one way of looking at it..Waco1947 said:Galatians 3:28Forest Bueller_bf said:He could have quoted Jesus from Matthew 19:4 has he wished.cms186 said:a couple of takes from this, and please note, when i say "you", i mean it in the plural sense, not you personally, but you seem to talk a lot about the bible, but whenever there is a problematic point in the Old Testament (and there are several) you always say that you are a New Testament Christian, but you always pick and choose the bits from the Old Testament which suit your particular Agenda.historian said:
"So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them." Genesis 1:27
There are no other options.
Ignoring that though, if you accept this particular quotation at face value and hold it as a honest belief, then surely you must be against any kind of Body Altering surgery? isnt that messing with Gods image? If God wanted you to have a Flat Chest or Wonky Teeth, or a Cleft Palate, or Astigmatism, shouldnt you then accept Gods image as it is and not cut off (or inject substances into) whatever parts of your body you want to?
Verse 4: "Have you not read that from the beginning he made them male and female?
It's not really an Old vs. New Testament issue.
New International Version
28 There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
Paul erases sexuality and Jesus never asks about about someone sexuality.
D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:Absolutely a stupid misrepresentation of of the AMA.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:The AMA is a political and advocacy group, not a scientific organization. Only 12% of practicing physicians are members of the AMA. They do not speak for the vast majority of doctors.Waco1947 said:The American medical association is my source of the science not your predujudice. Get real your facts and logic.D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:
Not a misperception. You are intelligent DC but when it to to human sexuality you need an education in human sexuality.
You have a misinterpretation of scripture and sexuality. Your doctrine is getting in the way of your literacy about these issues. You call it mind reading on my but the fact is -- you call them delusional and abnormal.
It is hard to discuss with someone who apparently refuses to get educated.
It is harder still to discuss with someone who randomly claims that I have my views on individuals who mistakenly believe they are the opposite sex because I don't understand scripture properly when I am not using scripture at all in forming my views.
Again, we can scientifically identify whether a human being is male or female. If a human male says he is actually female then he is clearly wrong about that factual assertion. So, yeah, it is not normal for a human male to believe that he is actually a human female. This is no different from a human believing that he or she is a dog or a cat. There is nothing about scripture or doctrine or sexuality in this statement. This is simply logic. You are speaking out of ignorance about human sexuality and gender identity..
You like to accuse me of hating people. That is a false accusation. If you have friends or family members with a serious mental illness, it does not mean that you do not value them or love them to say that they are delusional or abnormal.
You like to accuse me of being "uneducated" on these issues. You know nothing of my knowledge of human sexuality. It seems that you believe that if some doesn't hate people and is educated then they cannot disagree with you. That is both incredibly arrogant and incredibly shallow on your part.
I hate to break it to you, but it is possible to not hate people, to be quite knowledgeable and educated on the topic and still not agree with you.
Do you disagree that it is scientifically rather routine to determine someone's sex? Certainly this is true in percentages in the very high 90s.
Again, if someone who is a male is actually a female, then it is not an injustice to women for him to compete in athletics against them.
If he is not actually female, then he is experiencing some kind of delusional thinking to believe that he is female.
You say it is "probably" unjust for women to be forced to compete against men. It follows logically (not theologically) because I "hate" someone, that it is also "probably," according to you, deluded thinking on his part to think that his actual sex is female.
......
DC, you speak out of ignorance
This small minority of doctors are usually ones who are advocating for their particular medical field, and since transgender affirming care is a money making business, it's really no surprise that the ones who make money off of it would would join together and try to throw their opinion behind the weight of the authoritative-sounding "American Medical Association" title in order to fool ignorant people like yourself that their opinion is a medical consensus.
I'll bet you're the kind of person that believes those "Best Doctors Lists" in magazines are actually the area's best doctors, and not just a scheme to advertise or sell more of the magazine's plaques. I have bad news for you.
You "argue" from appeal to authority, emotion and by ad hominem attack, accusing me of "hating" people, but you do not answer very basic, logical questions.
Can a biological male actually be a female by virtue of cognition?
If yes, why do you say it is probably "unjust" for him to compete against women?
If no, why do you say that I "hate" people because I state a fact you agree is true?
Your refusal to answer these simple questions does not advance your argument, perhaps because your argument is self contradictory and answering these questions would force you to choose between being truthful and being faithful to your political allegiance.
ShooterTX said:
More evidence that the "it doesn't affect your life" crowd is full of *****
The left are the ones who want a theocracy. They want to force everyone to follow the beliefs of the church of Wokeness. You will be forced into all of their religious practices including tithes to the democrat party (church leadership), public professions of faith & adherance to anti-blasphemy laws (especially on social media), and especially the sacrifices. Sacrificing children to their gods through abortion and trans supporting mutilations which inevitably lead to suicide.
Leftist theology is the most dangerous religion on the planet, and the only one that uses the full force of government to conquer societies.“JK Rowling could be arrested in Scotland for making a series of posts misgendering transgender women, under a newly-enacted hate crime law, a politician in the UK has warned.”
— The Rabbit Hole (@TheRabbitHole84) April 1, 2024
The trans stuff is concerning for two major reasons:
1) Targeting of children
2) Free Speech… pic.twitter.com/k1E2rkQEAm
Forest Bueller_bf said:Sorry about that, I didn't see your post.historian said:
Thanks for reinforcing. I think I already did but it's a point worth repeating.
Waco1947 said:Galatians 3:28Forest Bueller_bf said:He could have quoted Jesus from Matthew 19:4 has he wished.cms186 said:a couple of takes from this, and please note, when i say "you", i mean it in the plural sense, not you personally, but you seem to talk a lot about the bible, but whenever there is a problematic point in the Old Testament (and there are several) you always say that you are a New Testament Christian, but you always pick and choose the bits from the Old Testament which suit your particular Agenda.historian said:
"So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them." Genesis 1:27
There are no other options.
Ignoring that though, if you accept this particular quotation at face value and hold it as a honest belief, then surely you must be against any kind of Body Altering surgery? isnt that messing with Gods image? If God wanted you to have a Flat Chest or Wonky Teeth, or a Cleft Palate, or Astigmatism, shouldnt you then accept Gods image as it is and not cut off (or inject substances into) whatever parts of your body you want to?
Verse 4: "Have you not read that from the beginning he made them male and female?
It's not really an Old vs. New Testament issue.
New International Version
28 There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
Paul erases sexuality and Jesus never asks about about someone sexuality.
Nope, he pretty much nailed it. It is a political organization that is bought and paid for by the pharmaceutical industry. If you really want to "follow the science," try citing a peer reviewed journal like The New England Journal of Medicine. There you will find that grooming isn't as cool as you think it is.Waco1947 said:Absolutely a stupid misrepresentation of of the AMA.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:The AMA is a political and advocacy group, not a scientific organization. Only 12% of practicing physicians are members of the AMA. They do not speak for the vast majority of doctors.Waco1947 said:The American medical association is my source of the science not your predujudice. Get real your facts and logic.D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:
Not a misperception. You are intelligent DC but when it to to human sexuality you need an education in human sexuality.
You have a misinterpretation of scripture and sexuality. Your doctrine is getting in the way of your literacy about these issues. You call it mind reading on my but the fact is -- you call them delusional and abnormal.
It is hard to discuss with someone who apparently refuses to get educated.
It is harder still to discuss with someone who randomly claims that I have my views on individuals who mistakenly believe they are the opposite sex because I don't understand scripture properly when I am not using scripture at all in forming my views.
Again, we can scientifically identify whether a human being is male or female. If a human male says he is actually female then he is clearly wrong about that factual assertion. So, yeah, it is not normal for a human male to believe that he is actually a human female. This is no different from a human believing that he or she is a dog or a cat. There is nothing about scripture or doctrine or sexuality in this statement. This is simply logic. You are speaking out of ignorance about human sexuality and gender identity..
You like to accuse me of hating people. That is a false accusation. If you have friends or family members with a serious mental illness, it does not mean that you do not value them or love them to say that they are delusional or abnormal.
You like to accuse me of being "uneducated" on these issues. You know nothing of my knowledge of human sexuality. It seems that you believe that if some doesn't hate people and is educated then they cannot disagree with you. That is both incredibly arrogant and incredibly shallow on your part.
I hate to break it to you, but it is possible to not hate people, to be quite knowledgeable and educated on the topic and still not agree with you.
Do you disagree that it is scientifically rather routine to determine someone's sex? Certainly this is true in percentages in the very high 90s.
Again, if someone who is a male is actually a female, then it is not an injustice to women for him to compete in athletics against them.
If he is not actually female, then he is experiencing some kind of delusional thinking to believe that he is female.
You say it is "probably" unjust for women to be forced to compete against men. It follows logically (not theologically) because I "hate" someone, that it is also "probably," according to you, deluded thinking on his part to think that his actual sex is female.
......
DC, you speak out of ignorance
This small minority of doctors are usually ones who are advocating for their particular medical field, and since transgender affirming care is a money making business, it's really no surprise that the ones who make money off of it would would join together and try to throw their opinion behind the weight of the authoritative-sounding "American Medical Association" title in order to fool ignorant people like yourself that their opinion is a medical consensus.
I'll bet you're the kind of person that believes those "Best Doctors Lists" in magazines are actually the area's best doctors, and not just a scheme to advertise or sell more of the magazine's plaques. I have bad news for you.
And AMA learned from their errors. AMA is still respected.whitetrash said:Just another practice and procedure advocated by the medical experts of the day, joining a long list including bloodletting, eugenics, forced sterilizations, frontal lobotomies.....Waco1947 said:
Of course the AMA is a lobbying group but they are medical experts first and foremost and they make clear their medical reasons for their stance. Bigots apparently don't like facts and prefer name calling and red herrings.
But hey, they're the experts.
Our sexuality means nothing to God. Jesus and Paul say so. You have not proved me wrong.4th and Inches said:that is one way of looking at it..Waco1947 said:Galatians 3:28Forest Bueller_bf said:He could have quoted Jesus from Matthew 19:4 has he wished.cms186 said:a couple of takes from this, and please note, when i say "you", i mean it in the plural sense, not you personally, but you seem to talk a lot about the bible, but whenever there is a problematic point in the Old Testament (and there are several) you always say that you are a New Testament Christian, but you always pick and choose the bits from the Old Testament which suit your particular Agenda.historian said:
"So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them." Genesis 1:27
There are no other options.
Ignoring that though, if you accept this particular quotation at face value and hold it as a honest belief, then surely you must be against any kind of Body Altering surgery? isnt that messing with Gods image? If God wanted you to have a Flat Chest or Wonky Teeth, or a Cleft Palate, or Astigmatism, shouldnt you then accept Gods image as it is and not cut off (or inject substances into) whatever parts of your body you want to?
Verse 4: "Have you not read that from the beginning he made them male and female?
It's not really an Old vs. New Testament issue.
New International Version
28 There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all
one in Christ Jesus.
Paul erases sexuality and Jesus never asks about about someone sexuality.
He meant all who believe in Jesus Christ are equal in the eyes of the Lord, he did not mean we could make up genders beyond those designated by God.
Red herring. Besides, if you figure it out, you're a smart guy. Anorexics a broken people and God heals them.ScottS said:
Should anorexics be treated or affirmed?
Whatever Groomer.Waco1947 said:And AMA learned from their errors. AMA is still respected.whitetrash said:Just another practice and procedure advocated by the medical experts of the day, joining a long list including bloodletting, eugenics, forced sterilizations, frontal lobotomies.....Waco1947 said:
Of course the AMA is a lobbying group but they are medical experts first and foremost and they make clear their medical reasons for their stance. Bigots apparently don't like facts and prefer name calling and red herrings.
But hey, they're the experts.
Waco1947 said:Red herring. Besides, if you figure it out, you're a smart guy. Anorexics a broken people and God heals them.ScottS said:
Should anorexics be treated or affirmed?
Waco1947 said:Our sexuality means nothing to God. Jesus and Paul say so. You have not proved me wrong.4th and Inches said:that is one way of looking at it..Waco1947 said:Galatians 3:28Forest Bueller_bf said:He could have quoted Jesus from Matthew 19:4 has he wished.cms186 said:a couple of takes from this, and please note, when i say "you", i mean it in the plural sense, not you personally, but you seem to talk a lot about the bible, but whenever there is a problematic point in the Old Testament (and there are several) you always say that you are a New Testament Christian, but you always pick and choose the bits from the Old Testament which suit your particular Agenda.historian said:
"So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them." Genesis 1:27
There are no other options.
Ignoring that though, if you accept this particular quotation at face value and hold it as a honest belief, then surely you must be against any kind of Body Altering surgery? isnt that messing with Gods image? If God wanted you to have a Flat Chest or Wonky Teeth, or a Cleft Palate, or Astigmatism, shouldnt you then accept Gods image as it is and not cut off (or inject substances into) whatever parts of your body you want to?
Verse 4: "Have you not read that from the beginning he made them male and female?
It's not really an Old vs. New Testament issue.
New International Version
28 There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all
one in Christ Jesus.
Paul erases sexuality and Jesus never asks about about someone sexuality.
He meant all who believe in Jesus Christ are equal in the eyes of the Lord, he did not mean we could make up genders beyond those designated by God.
they sure are!! By 12% of their own peer group they represent.Waco1947 said:And AMA learned from their errors. AMA is still respected.whitetrash said:Just another practice and procedure advocated by the medical experts of the day, joining a long list including bloodletting, eugenics, forced sterilizations, frontal lobotomies.....Waco1947 said:
Of course the AMA is a lobbying group but they are medical experts first and foremost and they make clear their medical reasons for their stance. Bigots apparently don't like facts and prefer name calling and red herrings.
But hey, they're the experts.
D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:Red herring. Besides, if you figure it out, you're a smart guy. Anorexics a broken people and God heals them.ScottS said:
Should anorexics be treated or affirmed?
When you are a man and think you are a woman, your mind is broken and needs to be healed.
yep, Romans 1 destroys his argumenthistorian said:
Our resident troll thinks God & Paul are ok with perversion. Of course, he's wrong.
Here's what Paul said about it:
"For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error." Romans 1:26-27
Read all of Chapter 1 for full context.
Here's what God said about homosexuality in Mosaic Law:
"Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable." Leviticus 18:22 NIV
If one reads further for context, one will find that God proscribed the death penalty. He definitely was NOT ok with it.
The LGBTQ is not broken. The American Psychiatric Association does not them "broken" that appellation is simply your opinion and the AMA and APA do not back you up. Your being obtuse.D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:Red herring. Besides, if you figure it out, you're a smart guy. Anorexics a broken people and God heals them.ScottS said:
Should anorexics be treated or affirmed?
When you are a man and think you are a woman, your mind is broken and needs to be healed.
