Bruce Leroy said:

---

bubbadog said:

---

JXL said:

---

It isn't "argument by anecdote" to say that Asians routinely outscore every other race on the SAT, despite substantial numbers of that community being immigrants. When will Cinque, Waco, etc., speak out against Asian privilege?

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/3902725

---

That's not exactly what he argued. He was arguing that white privilege doesn't exist because he knows a successful Asian couple.

---

I don't think that was what he was arguing in that post.

You may have concluded that based on his other posts but that specific post was in my opinion a anecdote position directly related to his questions to the Asian couple.

To quote Canada2017 said::

"Regardless....as promised I asked our dinner companions how they had done so well and if they had been 'held back' because they were Asians ."

The remainder of his response was apparently"no" that they were not held back and listed reasons they believed why they had do so well.

A specific anecdote (direct interaction) to illustrate a specific point about the Asian couple.

How did your thought process go from that post to stating that he was arguing that "white privilege doesn't exist" with the context of your response to me on the difference in his and your usage of anecdote points of view.

---

If that were Canada's only post you would be correct. But as you note up top the post has the larger context
of his prior postings.

Bruce Leroy said:

---

bubbadog said:

---

JXL said:

---

It isn't "argument by anecdote" to say that Asians routinely outscore every other race on the SAT, despite substantial numbers of that community being immigrants. When will Cinque, Waco, etc., speak out against Asian privilege?

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/3902725

---

That's not exactly what he argued. He was arguing that white privilege doesn't exist because he knows a successful Asian couple.

---

I don't think that was what he was arguing in that post.

You may have concluded that based on his other posts but that specific post was in my opinion a anecdote position directly related to his questions to the Asian couple.

To quote Canada2017 said::

"Regardless....as promised I asked our dinner companions how they had done so well and if they had been 'held back' because they were Asians ."

The remainder of his response was apparently"no" that they were not held back and listed reasons they believed why they had do so well.

A specific anecdote (direct interaction) to illustrate a specific point about the Asian couple.

How did your thought process go from that post to stating that he was arguing that "white privilege doesn't exist" within the context of your response to me on the difference in his and your usage of anecdote points of view. (ie." That's the difference between my post and Canada's. I try not to generalize from anecdotes.")

---

so he generalized from the statement that they weren't held back because they were Asian to conclude that other minorities weren't held back. And the reason they weren't held back is because white privilege really isn't a thing.

cinque said:

---

Canada2017 said:

---

Not even close princess.

You have a total obsession with skin color. Frames almost every thread you start.

( along with Donald Trump )

Sad as there is so much more to life.

---

Stop being silly. Most of my threads sound the alarm about the dangers of the Trump presidency

---

Not being 'silly' at all.

You are clearly obsessed about skin color and Donald Trump.....and strongly doubt you have anything substantial to show for It.

Canada2017 said:

---

cinque said:

---

Canada2017 said:

---

Not even close princess.

You have a total obsession with skin color. Frames almost every thread you start.

( along with Donald Trump )

Sad as there is so much more to life.

---

Stop being silly. Most of my threads sound the alarm about the dangers of the Trump presidency

---

Not being 'silly' at all.

You are clearly obsessed about skin color and Donald Trump.....and strongly doubt you have anything substantial to show for It.

---

Define substantial. I can't wait...

bubbadog said:

---

Bruce Leroy said:

---

bubbadog said:

---

JXL said:

---

It isn't "argument by anecdote" to say that Asians routinely outscore every other race on the SAT, despite substantial numbers of that community being immigrants. When will Cinque, Waco, etc., speak out against Asian privilege?

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/3902725

---

That's not exactly what he argued. He was arguing that white privilege doesn't exist because he knows a successful Asian couple.

---

I don't think that was what he was arguing in that post.

You may have concluded that based on his other posts but that specific post was in my opinion a anecdote position directly related to his questions to the Asian couple.

To quote Canada2017 said::

"Regardless....as promised I asked our dinner companions how they had done so well and if they had been 'held back' because they were Asians ."

The remainder of his response was apparently"no" that they were not held back and listed reasons they believed why they had do so well.

A specific anecdote (direct interaction) to illustrate a specific point about the Asian couple.

How did your thought process go from that post to stating that he was arguing that "white privilege doesn't exist" within the context of your response to me on the difference in his and your usage of anecdote points of view. (ie." That's the difference between my post and Canada's. I try not to generalize from anecdotes.")

---

so he generalized from the statement that they weren't held back because they were Asian to conclude that other minorities weren't held back. And the reason they weren't held back is because white privilege really isn't a thing.

---

Sorry, I think I am following but have additional questions.

I understand that your position is that I am to recognize that his specific response/argument regarding the questions posed to the Asian couple was to be understood as a generalized statement about "white privileged really isn't a thing". Would this be correct? .....And your generalizations of his specific response is to be understood as being consistent with your previous position that your anecdotal positions are valid and his are not because you "try not to generalize" and "Anecdotes are very useful for illustration of a point. Not so useful for generalization."?

I don't understand why so many of you can ignore the greatest, most obvious example of white privilege that has ever existed in human history; Donald John Trump.

cinque said:

---

I don't understand why so many of you can ignore the greatest, most obvious example of white privilege that has ever existed in human history; Donald John Trump.

---

' ever existed in human history '

chuckle


Hilarious to imagine the hyperbole you'll screach if Trump wins re election .

Canada2017 said:

---

cinque said:

---

I don't understand why so many of you can ignore the greatest, most obvious example of white privilege that has ever existed in human history; Donald John Trump.

---

' ever existed in human history '

chuckle


Hilarious to imagine the hyperbole you'll screach if Trump wins re election .

---

He's the best and worst example of white privilege ever.

cinque said:

---

Canada2017 said:

---

cinque said:

---

I don't understand why so many of you can ignore the greatest, most obvious example of white privilege that has ever existed in human history; Donald John Trump.

---

' ever existed in human history '

chuckle


Hilarious to imagine the hyperbole you'll screach if Trump wins re election .

---

He's the best and worst example of white privilege ever.

---

Not impressed.....needs more hyperbole.

Come on princess.....you've got it in you.

Canada2017 said:

---

cinque said:

---

Canada2017 said:

---

cinque said:

---

I don't understand why so many of you can ignore the greatest, most obvious example of white privilege that has ever existed in human history; Donald John Trump.

---

' ever existed in human history '

chuckle


Hilarious to imagine the hyperbole you'll screach if Trump wins re election .

---

He's the best and worst example of white privilege ever.

---

Not impressed.....needs more hyperbole.

Come on princess.....you've got it in you.

---

Do you think it's possible for a person of color with Trump's documented history of bad behavior, which covers his disrespect of women, discriminatory practices against minorities, shady business dealings (including his Trump University scam and subsequent 25 million penalty), his refusing to pay people what he owns them, his multiple marriages borne out of his infidelity, his overall ignorance of the political process, his vulgar, profane manner and his profligate lying, and his deference and appeasement of a foreign power could be elected POTUS? Any honest person would have to answer no, and that is the perfect example of white privilege. Obama with Trump's rap sheet would have been a non starter out of the gate. That the election of a degenerate Trump is a normal expectation for many of you, further demonstrates the existence of a privilege you don't even recognize.
And before I take it back, I'll add more to it.

chuckle

Much better 'effort' princess. Hope you get the opportunity to roll out this kind of BS for another 6 years ( at least ).

Pura Vida !

cinque said:

---

Canada2017 said:

---

cinque said:

---

Canada2017 said:

---

cinque said:

---

I don't understand why so many of you can ignore the greatest, most obvious example of white privilege that has ever existed in human history; Donald John Trump.

---

' ever existed in human history '

chuckle


Hilarious to imagine the hyperbole you'll screach if Trump wins re election .

---

He's the best and worst example of white privilege ever.

---

Not impressed.....needs more hyperbole.

Come on princess.....you've got it in you.

---

Do you think it's possible for a person of color with Trump's documented history of bad behavior, which covers his disrespect of women, discriminatory practices against minorities, shady business dealings (including his Trump University scam and subsequent 25 million penalty), his refusing to pay people what he owns them, his multiple marriages borne out of his infidelity, his overall ignorance of the political process, his vulgar, profane manner and his profligate lying, and his deference and appeasement of a foreign power could be elected POTUS? Any honest person would have to answer no, and that is the perfect example of white privilege. Obama with Trump's rap sheet would have been a non starter out of the gate. That the election of a degenerate Trump is a normal expectation for many of you, further demonstrates the existence of a privilege you don't even recognize.
And before I take it back, I'll add more to it.

---

In jest - I would need to know if that "person of color" would be running against Hillary Clinton before I can make a decision.

Bruce Leroy said:

---

cinque said:

---

Canada2017 said:

---

cinque said:

---

Canada2017 said:

---

cinque said:

---

I don't understand why so many of you can ignore the greatest, most obvious example of white privilege that has ever existed in human history; Donald John Trump.

---

' ever existed in human history '

chuckle


Hilarious to imagine the hyperbole you'll screach if Trump wins re election .

---

He's the best and worst example of white privilege ever.

---

Not impressed.....needs more hyperbole.

Come on princess.....you've got it in you.

---

Do you think it's possible for a person of color with Trump's documented history of bad behavior, which covers his disrespect of women, discriminatory practices against minorities, shady business dealings (including his Trump University scam and subsequent 25 million penalty), his refusing to pay people what he owns them, his multiple marriages borne out of his infidelity, his overall ignorance of the political process, his vulgar, profane manner and his profligate lying, and his deference and appeasement of a foreign power could be elected POTUS? Any honest person would have to answer no, and that is the perfect example of white privilege. Obama with Trump's rap sheet would have been a non starter out of the gate. That the election of a degenerate Trump is a normal expectation for many of you, further demonstrates the existence of a privilege you don't even recognize.
And before I take it back, I'll add more to it.

---

In jest - I would need to know if that "person of color" would be running against Hillary Clinton before I can make a decision.

---

Same here. But not in jest.

Bruce Leroy said:

---

cinque said:

---

Canada2017 said:

---

cinque said:

---

Canada2017 said:

---

cinque said:

---

I don't understand why so many of you can ignore the greatest, most obvious example of white privilege that has ever existed in human history; Donald John Trump.

---

' ever existed in human history '

chuckle


Hilarious to imagine the hyperbole you'll screach if Trump wins re election .

---

He's the best and worst example of white privilege ever.

---

Not impressed.....needs more hyperbole.

Come on princess.....you've got it in you.

---

Do you think it's possible for a person of color with Trump's documented history of bad behavior, which covers his disrespect of women, discriminatory practices against minorities, shady business dealings (including his Trump University scam and subsequent 25 million penalty), his refusing to pay people what he owns them, his multiple marriages borne out of his infidelity, his overall ignorance of the political process, his vulgar, profane manner and his profligate lying, and his deference and appeasement of a foreign power could be elected POTUS? Any honest person would have to answer no, and that is the perfect example of white privilege. Obama with Trump's rap sheet would have been a non starter out of the gate. That the election of a degenerate Trump is a normal expectation for many of you, further demonstrates the existence of a privilege you don't even recognize.
And before I take it back, I'll add more to it.

---

In jest - I would need to know if that "person of color" would be running against Hillary Clinton before I can make a decision.

---

Chuckle. No you wouldn't.

cinque said:

---

Bruce Leroy said:

---

cinque said:

---

Canada2017 said:

---

cinque said:

---

Canada2017 said:

---

cinque said:

---

I don't understand why so many of you can ignore the greatest, most obvious example of white privilege that has ever existed in human history; Donald John Trump.

---

' ever existed in human history '

chuckle


Hilarious to imagine the hyperbole you'll screach if Trump wins re election .

---

He's the best and worst example of white privilege ever.

---

Not impressed.....needs more hyperbole.

Come on princess.....you've got it in you.

---

Do you think it's possible for a person of color with Trump's documented history of bad behavior, which covers his disrespect of women, discriminatory practices against minorities, shady business dealings (including his Trump University scam and subsequent 25 million penalty), his refusing to pay people what he owns them, his multiple marriages borne out of his infidelity, his overall ignorance of the political process, his vulgar, profane manner and his profligate lying, and his deference and appeasement of a foreign power could be elected POTUS? Any honest person would have to answer no, and that is the perfect example of white privilege. Obama with Trump's rap sheet would have been a non starter out of the gate. That the election of a degenerate Trump is a normal expectation for many of you, further demonstrates the existence of a privilege you don't even recognize.
And before I take it back, I'll add more to it.

---

In jest - I would need to know if that "person of color" would be running against Hillary Clinton before I can make a decision.

---

Chuckle. No you wouldn't.

---

White privilege being a thing and all, I assume that under the circumstances you describe, you believe Sam, Doc, and fadskier would have voted for Hillary because she is white, over the hypothetical black Trump?

As with all the victim schtick, the false notions of victimization are created solely to attack a group. Examples:

1. 'White Privilege': Fabricated to attack whites, silence them in public discourse and create actual systemic racism to harm whites in favor of other racial/ethnic groups.

2. 'Gender Wage Gap': Fabricated to attack men, reduce their ability to gain employment vis-a-vis women, to mandate companies suffer massive financial losses by keeping jobs open for years long maternity leaves, and to attempt to provide undeserved salary increases to women.

3. 'Wealth Gap' / 'The 1%': Coined to engender class hatred between the workers and the moochers, mandate wealth redistribution policies and massive government defacto ownership of the means of production either directly or through regulations. The self evident stupidity lies in the fact that there will always be a top 1% even in a communist state.

4. 'Mansplaining': Explaining to an idiot who happens to have xx chromosomes. Term intended to silence the educated male to make the ignorant female feel better.

These are just a few.

GolemIII said:

---

As with all the victim schtick, the false notions of victimization are created solely to attack a group. Examples:

1. 'White Privilege': Fabricated to attack whites, silence them in public discourse and create actual systemic racism to harm whites in favor of other racial/ethnic groups.

2. 'Gender Wage Gap': Fabricated to attack men, reduce their ability to gain employment vis-a-vis women, to mandate companies suffer massive financial losses by keeping jobs open for years long maternity leaves, and to attempt to provide undeserved salary increases to women.

3. 'Wealth Gap' / 'The 1%': Coined to engender class hatred between the workers and the moochers, mandate wealth redistribution policies and massive government defacto ownership of the means of production either directly or through regulations. The self evident stupidity lies in the fact that there will always be a top 1% even in a communist state.

4. 'Mansplaining': Explaining to an idiot who happens to have xx chromosomes. Term intended to silence the educated male to make the ignorant female feel better.

These are just a few.

---

^^^ Just a bunch of simple ways to divide the people of a country in order to bring the country down then rebuild it how the Fascist Democrats desire. Have to kill off a country before it can be "transformed!" Simple Alinsky tactic

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

Yes. You do have to "get" jokes....and racist conspiracy theories too....but I repeat myself.

so if I'm half Hispanic and half white, do I have half-white privilege?

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

I still haven't received a good answer:
What should I do about my white privilege?

Advocate for a white tax? Give away my money? Tell white people they're evil? Don't hire any whites?

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

I still haven't received a good answer:
What should I do about my white privilege?

Advocate for a white tax? Give away my money? Tell white people they're evil? Don't hire any whites?

---

The reason they won't answer is because they can't. They can only speak in general terms and anecdotes.

fadskier said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

I still haven't received a good answer:
What should I do about my white privilege?

Advocate for a white tax? Give away my money? Tell white people they're evil? Don't hire any whites?

---

The reason they won't answer is because they can't. They can only speak in general terms and anecdotes.

---

Yep. It's crazy to think they have collective guilt and hate their own race.

Just another symptom of leftism.

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

In other words:

Still waiting to hear on my half white priv....anyone?

What about when I'm stopped for looking Hispanic? Is that my half white priv?

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

NO that is not how it works at all. I am waiting for valid proof but no one can provide that.

No one has been able to explain how it is white privilege to be on food stamps, or all the poor whites in numerous areas of the country on welfare.

Or any other example of white privilige.

The most I get is statements like yours that because "I don't get it, I don't see it."

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

NO that is not how it works at all. I am waiting for valid proof but no one can provide that.

No one has been able to explain how it is white privilege to be on food stamps, or all the poor whites in numerous areas of the country on welfare.

Or any other example of white privilige.

The most I get is statements like yours that because "I don't get it, I don't see it."

---

It's very easy to explain. If you're a white person on food stamps, you're less likely to go to prison than a black person, on food stamps, who behaves the same way you do.

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

NO that is not how it works at all. I am waiting for valid proof but no one can provide that.

No one has been able to explain how it is white privilege to be on food stamps, or all the poor whites in numerous areas of the country on welfare.

Or any other example of white privilige.

The most I get is statements like yours that because "I don't get it, I don't see it."

---

It's very easy to explain. If you're a white person on food stamps, you're less likely to go to prison than a black person, on food stamps, who behaves the same way you do.

---

Since when did being on food stamps become a crime?

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

NO that is not how it works at all. I am waiting for valid proof but no one can provide that.

No one has been able to explain how it is white privilege to be on food stamps, or all the poor whites in numerous areas of the country on welfare.

Or any other example of white privilige.

The most I get is statements like yours that because "I don't get it, I don't see it."

---

It's very easy to explain. If you're a white person on food stamps, you're less likely to go to prison than a black person, on food stamps, who behaves the same way you do.

---

Since when did being on food stamps become a crime?

---

It's not a crime, though one could easily make that mistake listening to some conservatives talk about it.

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

NO that is not how it works at all. I am waiting for valid proof but no one can provide that.

No one has been able to explain how it is white privilege to be on food stamps, or all the poor whites in numerous areas of the country on welfare.

Or any other example of white privilige.

The most I get is statements like yours that because "I don't get it, I don't see it."

---

It's very easy to explain. If you're a white person on food stamps, you're less likely to go to prison than a black person, on food stamps, who behaves the same way you do.

---

Since when did being on food stamps become a crime?

---

It's not a crime, though one could easily make that mistake listening to some conservatives talk about it.

---

Then why would a person of any color go to prison for being on food stamps as you implied?

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

NO that is not how it works at all. I am waiting for valid proof but no one can provide that.

No one has been able to explain how it is white privilege to be on food stamps, or all the poor whites in numerous areas of the country on welfare.

Or any other example of white privilige.

The most I get is statements like yours that because "I don't get it, I don't see it."

---

It's very easy to explain. If you're a white person on food stamps, you're less likely to go to prison than a black person, on food stamps, who behaves the same way you do.

---

Since when did being on food stamps become a crime?

---

It's not a crime, though one could easily make that mistake listening to some conservatives talk about it.

---

Then why would a person of any color go to prison for being on food stamps as you implied?

---

They wouldn't. They'd be more likely to go to prison for whatever crimes they did or were accused of doing.

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

NO that is not how it works at all. I am waiting for valid proof but no one can provide that.

No one has been able to explain how it is white privilege to be on food stamps, or all the poor whites in numerous areas of the country on welfare.

Or any other example of white privilige.

The most I get is statements like yours that because "I don't get it, I don't see it."

---

It's very easy to explain. If you're a white person on food stamps, you're less likely to go to prison than a black person, on food stamps, who behaves the same way you do.

---

Since when did being on food stamps become a crime?

---

It's not a crime, though one could easily make that mistake listening to some conservatives talk about it.

---

Then why would a person of any color go to prison for being on food stamps as you implied?

---

They wouldn't. They'd be more likely to go to prison for whatever crimes they did or were accused of doing.

---

So they are going to prison because of a crime they commit?

So the food stamps have zero to do with them being sent to prison and is unrelated to an attempt to prove white privilege as I've asked.

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

NO that is not how it works at all. I am waiting for valid proof but no one can provide that.

No one has been able to explain how it is white privilege to be on food stamps, or all the poor whites in numerous areas of the country on welfare.

Or any other example of white privilige.

The most I get is statements like yours that because "I don't get it, I don't see it."

---

It's very easy to explain. If you're a white person on food stamps, you're less likely to go to prison than a black person, on food stamps, who behaves the same way you do.

---

Since when did being on food stamps become a crime?

---

It's not a crime, though one could easily make that mistake listening to some conservatives talk about it.

---

Then why would a person of any color go to prison for being on food stamps as you implied?

---

They wouldn't. They'd be more likely to go to prison for whatever crimes they did or were accused of doing.

---

So they are going to prison because of a crime they commit?

So the food stamps have zero to do with them being sent to prison and is unrelated to an attempt to prove white privilege as I've asked.

---

You asked how a white person on food stamps is privileged. They're privileged to this extent: they're less likely to go to prison than a similarly situated black person who commits or doesn't commit the same crimes that the white person commits or doesn't commit. It may not be much, but it's something.

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

NO that is not how it works at all. I am waiting for valid proof but no one can provide that.

No one has been able to explain how it is white privilege to be on food stamps, or all the poor whites in numerous areas of the country on welfare.

Or any other example of white privilige.

The most I get is statements like yours that because "I don't get it, I don't see it."

---

It's very easy to explain. If you're a white person on food stamps, you're less likely to go to prison than a black person, on food stamps, who behaves the same way you do.

---

Since when did being on food stamps become a crime?

---

It's not a crime, though one could easily make that mistake listening to some conservatives talk about it.

---

Then why would a person of any color go to prison for being on food stamps as you implied?

---

They wouldn't. They'd be more likely to go to prison for whatever crimes they did or were accused of doing.

---

So they are going to prison because of a crime they commit?

So the food stamps have zero to do with them being sent to prison and is unrelated to an attempt to prove white privilege as I've asked.

---

You asked how a white person on food stamps is privileged. They're privileged to this extent: they're less likely to go to prison than a similarly situated black person who commits or doesn't commit the same crimes that the white person commits or doesn't commit. It may not be much, but it's something.

---

Blacks are 70% fatherless. Is this because of white privilege or do racial cultures behave differently?