HuMcK said:
Do you think the system needs changing or not? This is what I was talking about, Dems say there's a problem, Repubs say "we won't forgive loans", Dems ask "ok then what should we do?", Repubs say "we wont forgive loans", and on and on. I have yet to hear Republicans advocate for a solution to any issue that isn't just cutting taxes or regulations in some way.
Same as the healthcare debates, Dems want to do something, Repubs don't, and that's it. An entire generation of students has loans that are non-dischargeable and are holding them (and the economy) back because of unreasonably high debt loads. And now the (older) people who were able to pay their $1500 tuition bills off in a few years are asking why the current youth are fed up with paying down $50,000 a year tuition bills. The answer is things have changed from the old days, in ways that are screwing over young people, and I just wish conservatives could recognize that.
I paid for 1.5 years at Baylor and borrowed the rest. I owed around 100,000 when I graduated. It took me 10 very long years to pay it back. School is an investment. I was banking that the cost of attending would net me more money in the long run. It was not easy to pay that back and I don't blame people who struggle with it.
1) not everyone should go to college.
2) the government should not be in the loan business for schools, the rise of tuition can be directly tied to that
3) the $1,500 tuition sounds like a good argument but it's only a good argument because people are morons; highlighting point #1. A 1965 Mustang cost around $2,500 which, adjusted for inflation is around $20k. A new 2020 Mustang starts at $26k but includes about a thousand feature that didn't exist in 1965. Tuition is more now; but the services rendered are so much more.
There is a problem; you can convince me to address the short term issues only if we are willing to address the long term issues.