on this site, you are only allowed to type it or talk-to-text. We don't need to hear that stuffquash said:
Can I say gay? Can I say Disney? Or is that all it takes to get a thread cancelled?
quash said:
Can I say gay? Can I say Disney? Or is that all it takes to get a thread cancelled?
Do you seriously want to discuss the law or are you just going to go media narrative?quash said:
Can I say gay? Can I say Disney? Or is that all it takes to get a thread cancelled?
I reckon a whole bunch of parents with small children will decide to not visit Disney and spend their tourist dollars elsewhere.quash said:
Can I say gay? Can I say Disney? Or is that all it takes to get a thread cancelled?
And that's the way it should be.RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:I reckon a whole bunch of parents with small children will decide to not visit Disney and spend their tourist dollars elsewhere.quash said:
Can I say gay? Can I say Disney? Or is that all it takes to get a thread cancelled?
Disney needs to be careful. If DeSantis and the Legislature remove their self-governing jurisdiction and make them part of Orange County, it will be an enormous issue for them. Right now, they are their own government. Walt Disney negotiated this into the siting of Disney World to avoid the issues at Disney Land and the City of Anaheim encroachment locking them in. Reedy Creek Improvement District is Disney.RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:I reckon a whole bunch of parents with small children will decide to not visit Disney and spend their tourist dollars elsewhere.quash said:
Can I say gay? Can I say Disney? Or is that all it takes to get a thread cancelled?
Are threads being cancelled that use that language?quash said:
Can I say gay? Can I say Disney? Or is that all it takes to get a thread cancelled?
Mothra said:Are threads being cancelled that use that language?quash said:
Can I say gay? Can I say Disney? Or is that all it takes to get a thread cancelled?
Or are you just upset that Florida passed a law that prohibits state employees from telling kindergartners about trannies?
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
The original "Disney wants to gay your children" thread was locked. Instead of banning the presenters of gay sex poems and hilarious anal sex jokes, the thread was locked. Banning doesnt seem to work anyway.
If Disney is turning kids gay i would think lack of business would drive them out of business. I would rather the market handle it instead pf using the givernment as a tool to project my views on others.
I never took my kids to Disney. I dont think that has anything to do with 3 being healthy happy breeders.
Who's assuming? I asked a question, which you answered.quash said:Mothra said:Are threads being cancelled that use that language?quash said:
Can I say gay? Can I say Disney? Or is that all it takes to get a thread cancelled?
Or are you just upset that Florida passed a law that prohibits state employees from telling kindergartners about trannies?
I tried to post on a thread that was locked.
But you go ahead and assume you know something.
Xiledinok? Is that you? I have been wondering where you have been. Man, you had me fooled for sure.Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
I never took my kids to Disney. I dont think that has anything to do with 3 being healthy happy breeders.
Do you mean the thread titled "Disney?" It was locked for the vulgar personal insults of a poster, who I hope is now posting on the Texas Tech R&P forum. Maybe I am wrong, but I can't seem to find a thread with the title that you took pains to put in quotation marks.Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
The original "Disney wants to gay your children" thread was locked. Instead of banning the presenters of gay sex poems and hilarious anal sex jokes, the thread was locked. Banning doesnt seem to work anyway.
If Disney is turning kids gay i would think lack of business would drive them out of business. I would rather the market handle it instead pf using the givernment as a tool to project my views on others.
I never took my kids to Disney. I dont think that has anything to do with 3 being healthy happy breeders.
Timetraveler is a Liberal turd that is able to kill a thread with racism and hate and suffer no consequences. For some reason, the moderators have not figured this out yet.Malbec said:Do you mean the thread titled "Disney?" It was locked for the vulgar personal insults of a poster, who I hope is now posting on the Texas Tech R&P forum. Maybe I am wrong, but I can't seem to find a thread with the title that you took pains to put in quotation marks.Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
The original "Disney wants to gay your children" thread was locked. Instead of banning the presenters of gay sex poems and hilarious anal sex jokes, the thread was locked. Banning doesnt seem to work anyway.
If Disney is turning kids gay i would think lack of business would drive them out of business. I would rather the market handle it instead pf using the givernment as a tool to project my views on others.
I never took my kids to Disney. I dont think that has anything to do with 3 being healthy happy breeders.
The moderators don't need to sift through the dreck on this forum. They have normal-person lives. If a post violates the rules, flag it and they will review it and act appropriately. If you let reprobates like timetraveler get away with crapping on the discussion and the rules, they will continue to do it. SE365 isn't Portland... yet.RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:Timetraveler is a Liberal turd that is able to kill a thread with racism and hate and suffer no consequences. For some reason, the moderators have not figured this out yet.Malbec said:Do you mean the thread titled "Disney?" It was locked for the vulgar personal insults of a poster, who I hope is now posting on the Texas Tech R&P forum. Maybe I am wrong, but I can't seem to find a thread with the title that you took pains to put in quotation marks.Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
The original "Disney wants to gay your children" thread was locked. Instead of banning the presenters of gay sex poems and hilarious anal sex jokes, the thread was locked. Banning doesnt seem to work anyway.
If Disney is turning kids gay i would think lack of business would drive them out of business. I would rather the market handle it instead pf using the givernment as a tool to project my views on others.
I never took my kids to Disney. I dont think that has anything to do with 3 being healthy happy breeders.
I see a locked thread entitled "Disney." Don't see a thread entitled "Disney wants to gay your children." Can you link to the thread you are referencing?Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
The original "Disney wants to gay your children" thread was locked. Instead of banning the presenters of gay sex poems and hilarious anal sex jokes, the thread was locked. Banning doesnt seem to work anyway.
If Disney is turning kids gay i would think lack of business would drive them out of business. I would rather the market handle it instead pf using the givernment as a tool to project my views on others.
I never took my kids to Disney. I dont think that has anything to do with 3 being healthy happy breeders.
Cat got your tongue? Or are you just full of *****Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
The original "Disney wants to gay your children" thread was locked. Instead of banning the presenters of gay sex poems and hilarious anal sex jokes, the thread was locked. Banning doesnt seem to work anyway.
If Disney is turning kids gay i would think lack of business would drive them out of business. I would rather the market handle it instead pf using the givernment as a tool to project my views on others.
I never took my kids to Disney. I dont think that has anything to do with 3 being healthy happy breeders.
This is silly. Have you looked at the actual wording of the legisation.quash said:
Can I say gay? Can I say Disney? Or is that all it takes to get a thread cancelled?
You got it. It really is about nothing. The other part of the legislation that is getting them in an uproar is notifying parents.Forest Bueller_bf said:This is silly. Have you looked at the actual wording of the legisation.quash said:
Can I say gay? Can I say Disney? Or is that all it takes to get a thread cancelled?
It is simply keeping teachers from instructing or talking about sexuality or their sexuality for grades K-3.
Why in the world would anybody want their child age 5 to 9 be subject to listening to some jackass talk to
them about sexuality, much less same sex sexuality.
There is a time and place for everything, the classroom, with little children is not that place or time.
quash said:
Can I say gay?
Not wanting to teach kids about sex and gender ideology is homophobic 🤨 pic.twitter.com/q4FKYxqoKM
— Libs of Tik Tok (@libsoftiktok) April 7, 2022
This dude is exactly why you don't want teachers talking to little kids about sex.muddybrazos said:Not wanting to teach kids about sex and gender ideology is homophobic 🤨 pic.twitter.com/q4FKYxqoKM
— Libs of Tik Tok (@libsoftiktok) April 7, 2022
these groomers are far worse than we thought they were.
Forest Bueller_bf said:This is silly. Have you looked at the actual wording of the legisation.quash said:
Can I say gay? Can I say Disney? Or is that all it takes to get a thread cancelled?
It is simply keeping teachers from instructing or talking about sexuality or their sexuality for grades K-3.
Why in the world would anybody want their child age 5 to 9 be subject to listening to some jackass talk to
them about sexuality, much less same sex sexuality.
There is a time and place for everything, the classroom, with little children is not that place or time.
I think what the problem is, some overly emotional adults, who cry online and outloud about being repressed because they can't share their "personal lives" meaning their sexuality with their just past toddler age students, there are some people who actually are listening to them seriously.Mothra said:Forest Bueller_bf said:This is silly. Have you looked at the actual wording of the legisation.quash said:
Can I say gay? Can I say Disney? Or is that all it takes to get a thread cancelled?
It is simply keeping teachers from instructing or talking about sexuality or their sexuality for grades K-3.
Why in the world would anybody want their child age 5 to 9 be subject to listening to some jackass talk to
them about sexuality, much less same sex sexuality.
There is a time and place for everything, the classroom, with little children is not that place or time.
What's both hilarious and sad at the same time is the poster you're responding to apparently thinks it's somehow "libertarian" for state employees to be able to teach your kindergartener about gay sex.
NEW: Disney executive producer Latoya Raveneau says she identifies as a "bi-romantic asexual" and that she wants to "use [her] content" at Disney to educate children about "the pockets of the LGBTQ community that you don't see," such as the asexual community. pic.twitter.com/gNJ0CItgqV
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) April 7, 2022
NEW: Disney corporate president Karey Burke, the "mother of two queer children," says the company has been "targeting Gen Z and millennials" with LGBTQIA+ "inclusion" content. Her son told her that "Gen Z is 30-40% queerer" and that Disney "better get with it." pic.twitter.com/CYYD7NqKZg
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) April 7, 2022
NEW: Disney CEO Bob Chapek grovels, apologizes, and pledges to "be a better ally for the LGBTQ+ community." He delegated the company's moral authority to the "LGBTQIA+ Advisory Council" and now those internal activists have taken him as an ideological hostage. pic.twitter.com/efOSOmb47a
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) April 7, 2022
NEW: Katie Barnes, a "black, queer, and trans" they/them, told her Disney colleagues that "holding the company accountable means unpacking [her] own pain." This is a textbook example of how identity activists use the rhetoric of "trauma" as a tool for emotional manipulation. pic.twitter.com/xXzcVscCGv
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) April 7, 2022
If you need validation of your personal life from a 4 year old, you should not be a teacher.muddybrazos said:
So when gays wanted to get married they said they just wanted to be with the one they loved. Fast forward a few years and they want to force their weird insane queer ideologies on children as early as possible. I used to be more of a libertarian leaning type person that was like live your life and do your thing but stuff like this makes me wanna go hardcore social conservative. They really are out to groom and convert as many kids to their sick lifestyle as possible. The slippery slope people were 100% correct. I now dread the month of June bc we get beaten over the head with all these different letters for a month.
This polyamorous genderfluid witch is a preschool teacher in Florida. She’s so proud of herself that she discusses her gender and sexuality with 4 year olds pic.twitter.com/XOuuX6by4w
— Libs of Tik Tok (@libsoftiktok) April 7, 2022