Canon said:ATL Bear said:We keep being told we're overreacting and keep giving up hills, and then a more bizarre one follows. Turns out, love had nothing to do with it.quash said:ATL Bear said:No ideas were banned. They were moved down the curriculum spectrum. They also dictate which and what mathematics you teach, scientific material you introduce, and literary concepts you employ.quash said:ATL Bear said:
If defining age appropriate curriculum material is "banning ideas", then there is an entire litany of mathematics, science, and literature "ideas" that are currently banned. Really not a difficult concept to grasp unless you think government employees and not parents need to be more involved in the sexual identities of 4-8 year olds.
And prior to this law the age appropriate concepts were already being taught. But individuals, being people, cross the line from time to time. Prior to this law those teachers were rebuked or fired at the local level.
But ever since Team Karen put on a red jersey we have to pass state laws banning specific ideas. Karen now dictates how we talk about race, gender, etc.
And she will show up in a blue jersey one of these days and y'all will start keening about cancel culture. Again
Let's stop overreacting to the emotionalism of "I can't talk about my partner".
Sure. Soon as y'all quit overreacting to, well, everything. When Texas turns blue and the state starts forcing pronouns on you just remember this hill you fought to defend.
Also - "If you won't have sex with a female with a *****, you are a transphobe"