90sBear said:
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:
What do you mean "finally"? I posted that exact link and said they were close to my views in my second post in this thread. When asked what your complete views are, you responded with, "my belief is that salvation is by faith, not works". Well...I wouldn't say that to them either. This isn't the AHA! moment you are making it out to be.
Where did I say, "musical ability matters in whether one goes to heaven"? What I said was, "IMO based off my conversations with people over the years, works have played a role in whether some people may or may not go to Heaven."
Again, what I said was, "IMO based off my conversations with people over the years, works have played a role in whether some people may or may not go to Heaven."
You don't seem to give people much credit for trying to learn nuance. In case you haven't picked it up by now, I often don't give short single sentence explanations on my views. IMO this topic is more nuanced than "salvation is by faith, not works" so I'm going to give a more complete response to someone. On the flip side, If IMO they are in a good place with their faith I'm really not going to worry too much about their precise views on works.
This is back to that tone I was referring to before.
As a side note in regards to worrying about the message that short responses can impart (and how I worry about "not good" views on both sides), I worry that emphasizing the thief on the cross story to people can impart the idea that people can do whatever they want in life and then just say, "I believe in Jesus" at the end and get into heaven. IMO that is not necessarily Biblical. I already said I think believing in Jesus and wanting to get into heaven are not necessarily the same thing. I would also warn people that coming up with a plan to do whatever you want in life and then go for the loophole into heaven at the end is deceptive. I don't know what God thinks about that.
That is why when I talk about this story I say that his faith saved him and that he did what he could for as long as he could.
Well it's been answered now. Have you ever been involved with hospital ministry of any kind?
Again, IMO based off my conversations with people over the years, works have played a role in whether some people may or may not go to Heaven.
If you believe what you say you do, that we are saved by faith not by works, then saying "salvation is by faith, not works" (what I said) conveys the correct message. However, saying "works matters in whether someone goes to heaven" (what YOU are saying) does not, and seems to contradict your belief. This is how most people will understand that phrase. You can go for nuance all you want, but
clarity is much more important.
I didn't say that you said "musical ability matters whether one goes to heaven". I said that according to your reasoning, this statement is also valid. But I think you realize how this conveys the wrong message. So in the same way, so does saying "works matters whether one goes to heaven". Please comprehend better, I'm tired of having to repeat myself.
No, the story of the thief on the cross does not convey the idea that one can "just believe" and then do whatever they want. The thief repented, believed, and put his faith in his "salvation" in Jesus hands. That is most certainly the biblical path to salvation. "Believing" is not just believing in facts, it involves repenting and putting your trust and faith in Jesus too. It's a heart move, not just a brain move. The thief on the cross displayed all that.
Answer the question - suppose the thief had NOT done what he could, but rather just kept his faith in his heart, would he have still been saved by Jesus? I'm assuming based on what you've said so far, that you believe he would have been. We can conclude then, that in his case works didn't matter at all in whether he went to heaven.
Do you acknowledge this to be true? Please answer.
No, I have not been involved in hospital ministry. You don't need to be in hospital ministry to know that someone who is dying or dies right after becoming a Christian shouldn't be told that "works matter".
That isn't the time for nuance, it's the time for clarity. The focus should be on what Jesus did and your faith and trust in that, not in what you've done or are able to do. And that goes pretty much for every other Christian in the world (the other "99%"), hospital or not.
Works may have a role in people's
faith, but it's their faith that saves, not the works. You're using transitive reasoning to then say that works had a role in them going to heaven. But based on this reasoning then, one can also say that eating pizza or playing tennis matters in whether one goes to heaven. You can try and "nuance" your way into showing how that can be true, but we both know that people interpret that phrase to mean that one must eat pizza or play tennis to be saved, so it shouldn't be said. And you know it shouldn't, you're just choosing to be contrarian over having clarity.