Understanding LGBTQ sexuality

147,666 Views | 1803 Replies | Last: 2 mo ago by Forest Bueller_bf
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Ideology on the right does not trump science
So it's scientific to believe men can be women and vice versa.

Interesting...
Misinterpretation of science. Your claim is Shallow and sophomoric but you are not alone in your ignorance. College educated people should be able to research gender identification and come to a more modern, scientific conclusion. Too many are driven by religious dogma and not by study and science.


If you are a man but you believe that you are a woman you are suffering from a mental illness. There is no religious dogma involved here. It is no different than if you are a human but you believe you are a cow.
again ignorance.
Waco1947 ,la
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Ideology on the right does not trump science
So it's scientific to believe men can be women and vice versa.

Interesting...
Misinterpretation of science. Your claim is Shallow and sophomoric but you are not alone in your ignorance. College educated people should be able to research gender identification and come to a more modern, scientific conclusion. Too many are driven by religious dogma and not by study and science.


If you are a man but you believe that you are a woman you are suffering from a mental illness. There is no religious dogma involved here. It is no different than if you are a human but you believe you are a cow.
again ignorance.


You need to say something, not just post with your signature.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Ideology on the right does not trump science
So it's scientific to believe men can be women and vice versa.

Interesting...
Misinterpretation of science. Your claim is Shallow and sophomoric but you are not alone in your ignorance. College educated people should be able to research gender identification and come to a more modern, scientific conclusion. Too many are driven by religious dogma and not by study and science.
a minister is telling you to bible less and science more because God makes mistakes..

I continue to pray for him.
Adopt-a-Bear 2024

#90 COOPER LANZ ( DL )
CLASS Junior
HT/WT 6' 3", 288 lbs


#50 KAIAN ROBERTS-DAY ( DL )
CLASS Sophomore
HT/WT 6' 3", 273 lbs
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Ideology on the right does not trump science
So it's scientific to believe men can be women and vice versa.

Interesting...
Misinterpretation of science. Your claim is Shallow and sophomoric but you are not alone in your ignorance. College educated people should be able to research gender identification and come to a more modern, scientific conclusion. Too many are driven by religious dogma and not by study and science.


If you are a man but you believe that you are a woman you are suffering from a mental illness. There is no religious dogma involved here. It is no different than if you are a human but you believe you are a cow.
again ignorance.
Yes, you show quite a bit of it
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

Waco1947 said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Ideology on the right does not trump science
So it's scientific to believe men can be women and vice versa.

Interesting...
Misinterpretation of science. Your claim is Shallow and sophomoric but you are not alone in your ignorance. College educated people should be able to research gender identification and come to a more modern, scientific conclusion. Too many are driven by religious dogma and not by study and science.
a minister is telling you to bible less and science more because God makes mistakes..

I continue to pray for him.
I think it/he/she is just either

1) Old lonely person that has no friends or family and spends their empty days trolling people
2) A young loser living in their parent's basement and has zero friends and spends their empty day trolling people
3) Humck's cousin or half brother or both
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Ideology on the right does not trump science
So it's scientific to believe men can be women and vice versa.

Interesting...
Misinterpretation of science. Your claim is Shallow and sophomoric but you are not alone in your ignorance. College educated people should be able to research gender identification and come to a more modern, scientific conclusion. Too many are driven by religious dogma and not by study and science.


If you are a man but you believe that you are a woman you are suffering from a mental illness. There is no religious dogma involved here. It is no different than if you are a human but you believe you are a cow.
again ignorance.
Should anorexics be affirmed or treated?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here are actual facts and all Waco47 can say is "get edikated!!!"


Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Ideology on the right does not trump science
So it's scientific to believe men can be women and vice versa.

Interesting...
Misinterpretation of science. Your claim is Shallow and sophomoric but you are not alone in your ignorance. College educated people should be able to research gender identification and come to a more modern, scientific conclusion. Too many are driven by religious dogma and not by study and science.
Ignorance by college educated people is sad.

If you are a man but you believe that you are a woman you are suffering from a mental illness. There is no religious dogma involved here. It is no different than if you are a human but you believe you are a cow.
again ignorance.


You need to say something, not just post with your signature.
it's hard to believe that a college educated man could be so ignorant. And have no curiosity about this subject. It's not a mental illness.
Waco1947 ,la
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Ideology on the right does not trump science
So it's scientific to believe men can be women and vice versa.

Interesting...
Misinterpretation of science. Your claim is Shallow and sophomoric but you are not alone in your ignorance. College educated people should be able to research gender identification and come to a more modern, scientific conclusion. Too many are driven by religious dogma and not by study and science.
Ignorance by college educated people is sad.

If you are a man but you believe that you are a woman you are suffering from a mental illness. There is no religious dogma involved here. It is no different than if you are a human but you believe you are a cow.
again ignorance.


You need to say something, not just post with your signature.
it's hard to believe that a college educated man could be so ignorant. And have no curiosity about this subject. It's not a mental illness.

Should anorexics be affirmed or treated?

(So the DSM is wrong?)
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Ideology on the right does not trump science
So it's scientific to believe men can be women and vice versa.

Interesting...
Misinterpretation of science. Your claim is Shallow and sophomoric but you are not alone in your ignorance. College educated people should be able to research gender identification and come to a more modern, scientific conclusion. Too many are driven by religious dogma and not by study and science.
Ignorance by college educated people is sad.

If you are a man but you believe that you are a woman you are suffering from a mental illness. There is no religious dogma involved here. It is no different than if you are a human but you believe you are a cow.
again ignorance.


You need to say something, not just post with your signature.
it's hard to believe that a college educated man could be so ignorant. And have no curiosity about this subject. It's not a mental illness.



But then, here you are posting things that defy reason.

Make the case that a human individual who is measurably classified as "male" by every possible biological indicator is actually properly classified as "female." I will wait.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Ideology on the right does not trump science
So it's scientific to believe men can be women and vice versa.

Interesting...
Your claim is Shallow and sophomoric but you are not alone in your ignorance. College educated people should be able to research gender identification and come to a more modern, scientific conclusion.
Amusing that you mention 'college educated people' when you lied about graduating from Baylor.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Ideology on the right does not trump science
So it's scientific to believe men can be women and vice versa.

Interesting...
Misinterpretation of science. Your claim is Shallow and sophomoric but you are not alone in your ignorance. College educated people should be able to research gender identification and come to a more modern, scientific conclusion. Too many are driven by religious dogma and not by study and science.
Ignorance by college educated people is sad.

If you are a man but you believe that you are a woman you are suffering from a mental illness. There is no religious dogma involved here. It is no different than if you are a human but you believe you are a cow.
again ignorance.


You need to say something, not just post with your signature.
it's hard to believe that a college educated man could be so ignorant. And have no curiosity about this subject. It's not a mental illness.



But then, here you are posting things that defy reason.

Make the case that a human individual who is measurably classified as "male" by every possible biological indicator is actually properly classified as "female." I will wait.
Like most Klanocrats, the old groomer repeatedly demonstrates his inability to formulate an affirmative position or defend his statements. He can call anyone who disagrees with him names but that's about the extend of his intellectual chops.

There is a reason he avoids the questions of anorexics because it undermines his entire position.

He does not believe in science or doing right by children based on his comments, he's just a brownshirt in a National Socialist regime.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

SIC EM 94 said:

What a shock that a disgusting heretic such as yourself thinks that Focus on the Family is wrong in their position on the word of God.
Yep and really that's the whole aim: no procreation.

You can't be fruitful and multiply if you're only fruitful with a fruit.


Maybe they will learn to split themselves...
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Ideology on the right does not trump science
So it's scientific to believe men can be women and vice versa.

Interesting...
Misinterpretation of science. Your claim is Shallow and sophomoric but you are not alone in your ignorance. College educated people should be able to research gender identification and come to a more modern, scientific conclusion. Too many are driven by religious dogma and not by study and science.


If you are a man but you believe that you are a woman you are suffering from a mental illness. There is no religious dogma involved here. It is no different than if you are a human but you believe you are a cow.
again ignorance.


Again, science.
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Ideology on the right does not trump science
So it's scientific to believe men can be women and vice versa.

Interesting...
Misinterpretation of science. Your claim is Shallow and sophomoric but you are not alone in your ignorance. College educated people should be able to research gender identification and come to a more modern, scientific conclusion. Too many are driven by religious dogma and not by study and science.
Ignorance by college educated people is sad.

If you are a man but you believe that you are a woman you are suffering from a mental illness. There is no religious dogma involved here. It is no different than if you are a human but you believe you are a cow.
again ignorance.


You need to say something, not just post with your signature.
it's hard to believe that a college educated man could be so ignorant. And have no curiosity about this subject. It's not a mental illness.



But then, here you are posting things that defy reason.

Make the case that a human individual who is measurably classified as "male" by every possible biological indicator is actually properly classified as "female." I will wait.
Like most Klanocrats, the old groomer repeatedly demonstrates his inability to formulate an affirmative position or defend his statements. He can call anyone who disagrees with him names but that's about the extend of his intellectual chops.

There is a reason he avoids the questions of anorexics because it undermines his entire position.

He does not believe in science or doing right by children based on his comments, he's just a brownshirt in a National Socialist regime.
If you really want to undermine this new age of "gender affirming care", let's talk about the treatment of Dissociative Identity Disorder (multiple personalities). With DID the psychotherapy process is to reconnect the patient to their natural identity state. If we took the affirming approach you would chemically and surgically alter the patient into their alternate reality, which by the way individuals with DID have a high percentage of alternate sex personalities. This is truly insanity where we've gone.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Ideology on the right does not trump science
So it's scientific to believe men can be women and vice versa.

Interesting...
Misinterpretation of science. Your claim is Shallow and sophomoric but you are not alone in your ignorance. College educated people should be able to research gender identification and come to a more modern, scientific conclusion. Too many are driven by religious dogma and not by study and science.
Ignorance by college educated people is sad.

If you are a man but you believe that you are a woman you are suffering from a mental illness. There is no religious dogma involved here. It is no different than if you are a human but you believe you are a cow.
again ignorance.


You need to say something, not just post with your signature.
it's hard to believe that a college educated man could be so ignorant. And have no curiosity about this subject. It's not a mental illness.



But then, here you are posting things that defy reason.

Make the case that a human individual who is measurably classified as "male" by every possible biological indicator is actually properly classified as "female." I will wait.
Like most Klanocrats, the old groomer repeatedly demonstrates his inability to formulate an affirmative position or defend his statements. He can call anyone who disagrees with him names but that's about the extend of his intellectual chops.

There is a reason he avoids the questions of anorexics because it undermines his entire position.

He does not believe in science or doing right by children based on his comments, he's just a brownshirt in a National Socialist regime.
If you really want to undermine this new age of "gender affirming care", let's talk about the treatment of Dissociative Identity Disorder (multiple personalities). With DID the psychotherapy process is to reconnect the patient to their natural identity state. If we took the affirming approach you would chemically and surgically alter the patient into their alternate reality, which by the way individuals with DID have a high percentage of alternate sex personalities. This is truly insanity where we've gone.


The trainey movement is little more than a money grab by the Gaystapo laundering it through Big Pharma
leaving science and children in its authoritarian-fascist wake. The ******ed fascists have taken over.
ShooterTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Ideology on the right does not trump science
So it's scientific to believe men can be women and vice versa.

Interesting...
Misinterpretation of science. Your claim is Shallow and sophomoric but you are not alone in your ignorance. College educated people should be able to research gender identification and come to a more modern, scientific conclusion. Too many are driven by religious dogma and not by study and science.
Ignorance by college educated people is sad.

If you are a man but you believe that you are a woman you are suffering from a mental illness. There is no religious dogma involved here. It is no different than if you are a human but you believe you are a cow.
again ignorance.


You need to say something, not just post with your signature.
it's hard to believe that a college educated man could be so ignorant. And have no curiosity about this subject. It's not a mental illness.

Should anorexics be affirmed or treated?
ShooterTX
ShooterTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Ideology on the right does not trump science
So it's scientific to believe men can be women and vice versa.

Interesting...
Misinterpretation of science. Your claim is Shallow and sophomoric but you are not alone in your ignorance. College educated people should be able to research gender identification and come to a more modern, scientific conclusion. Too many are driven by religious dogma and not by study and science.


If you are a man but you believe that you are a woman you are suffering from a mental illness. There is no religious dogma involved here. It is no different than if you are a human but you believe you are a cow.
again ignorance.
Should anorexics be affirmed or treated?
ShooterTX
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ShooterTX said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Ideology on the right does not trump science
So it's scientific to believe men can be women and vice versa.

Interesting...
Misinterpretation of science. Your claim is Shallow and sophomoric but you are not alone in your ignorance. College educated people should be able to research gender identification and come to a more modern, scientific conclusion. Too many are driven by religious dogma and not by study and science.


If you are a man but you believe that you are a woman you are suffering from a mental illness. There is no religious dogma involved here. It is no different than if you are a human but you believe you are a cow.
again ignorance.
Should anorexics be affirmed or treated?
47 has a habit of ignoring posts that prove him to be an idiot.


Forest Bueller_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
47 at this point you are simply trolling everybody that disagrees with you.

Calling everybody but yourself ignorant is not constructive.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

A person's sexuality should not on public display or celebrated. What people do behind closed doors is their own business, - nobody elses.

Am sick and tired of a very small segment of the population trying to ram their sexuality and deviant behaviors down our throats.

You people go do your thing and leave the rest of us the Hell alone.

P.S. - Stay away from our children.
So kick gays kids out of school?
Who ramming anything.? I find statements like cramming or ramming weird. I heard it about blacks appearing in commercials. Or the media giving popes airtime. Or women being shown in male occupations. The world is changing and it's for the better.
You are not being hurt and neither are your kids.
Calm down and carry on
try thinking eternally.

If I have an urge to screw any female on two legs, regardless that I am married to one already, is that okay with you, with God?

I think I was born with this desire. Who I screw is my business and, as long as I keep it private, hurts no one. I think I'm good.

Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ignorance of the Bible and human sexuality is inexcusable
Waco1947 ,la
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Ignorance of the Bible and human sexuality is inexcusable
Agreed. Sadly you keep selling ignorance Waco, and if you understand it is inexcusable to do so, I am baffled as to why you continue.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Ignorance of the Bible and human sexuality is inexcusable
So you have no excuse?

We agree.
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ShooterTX said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Ideology on the right does not trump science
So it's scientific to believe men can be women and vice versa.

Interesting...
Misinterpretation of science. Your claim is Shallow and sophomoric but you are not alone in your ignorance. College educated people should be able to research gender identification and come to a more modern, scientific conclusion. Too many are driven by religious dogma and not by study and science.
Ignorance by college educated people is sad.

If you are a man but you believe that you are a woman you are suffering from a mental illness. There is no religious dogma involved here. It is no different than if you are a human but you believe you are a cow.
again ignorance.


You need to say something, not just post with your signature.
it's hard to believe that a college educated man could be so ignorant. And have no curiosity about this subject. It's not a mental illness.

Should anorexics be affirmed or treated?


Both.
They should be treated for their mental illness, and affirmed for their humanity.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Ignorance of the Bible and human sexuality is inexcusable
So you have no excuse?

We agree.
Show me where I am wrong. You got any passages? Start with Jesus.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Ignorance of the Bible and human sexuality is inexcusable
So you have no excuse?

We agree.
Show me where I am wrong. You got any passages? Start with Jesus.
Really? You've been provided passages on dozens of occasions to prove you are a moron, and you have no cogent retort. But sure, let's do it again.

1 Timothy 1:8-11
Romans 1:27-28
Leviticus 18:22
1 Corinthians 6:9-10
1 Corinthians 6:18
Hebrews 13:4

And I am already predicting your absurd and ill-informed retort. Let's see if I am right. Good luck, heretic!
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Ignorance of the Bible and human sexuality is inexcusable
So you have no excuse?

We agree.
Show me where I am wrong. You got any passages? Start with Jesus.


Jesus claimed to be supernatural.
You claim that there is no supernatural.
Either you are wrong or Jesus is.

Any more questions?
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Ignorance of the Bible and human sexuality is inexcusable
So you have no excuse?

We agree.
Show me where I am wrong. You got any passages? Start with Jesus.
Should anorexics be affirmed or treated?
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Ignorance of the Bible and human sexuality is inexcusable
Should anorexics be affirmed or treated?
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Ideology on the right does not trump science
So it's scientific to believe men can be women and vice versa.

Interesting...
Misinterpretation of science. Your claim is Shallow and sophomoric but you are not alone in your ignorance. College educated people should be able to research gender identification and come to a more modern, scientific conclusion. Too many are driven by religious dogma and not by study and science.
Ignorance by college educated people is sad.

If you are a man but you believe that you are a woman you are suffering from a mental illness. There is no religious dogma involved here. It is no different than if you are a human but you believe you are a cow.
again ignorance.


You need to say something, not just post with your signature.
it's hard to believe that a college educated man could be so ignorant. And have no curiosity about this subject. It's not a mental illness.


Don't be some hard on yourself.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Ignorance of the Bible and human sexuality is inexcusable
So you have no excuse?

We agree.
Show me where I am wrong. You got any passages? Start with Jesus.
First United Methodist to the rescue again?
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I Timothy 1: 10 Here's the key point to remember," writes Matthew. "Even if Paul had intended his words to be a condemnation of all forms of same-sex relations, the context in which he would have been making that statement would still differ significantly from our context today." That's because same-sex behavior in the first century was not understood to be the expression of an exclusive sexual orientation but rather it was understood as excess on the part of those who could easily be content with heterosexual relationships, but who went beyond them in search of more exotic pleasures. So when the translation of malakoi and arsenokoites shifted in the 20th century to refer to people with same-sex orientation, "it fostered the mistaken belief that Paul was condemning a minority group with a different sexual orientation" when "in fact, he was condemning excessive and exploitive sexual conduct." Rachel Held
ShooterTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

I Timothy 1: 10 Here's the key point to remember," writes Matthew. "Even if Paul had intended his words to be a condemnation of all forms of same-sex relations, the context in which he would have been making that statement would still differ significantly from our context today." That's because same-sex behavior in the first century was not understood to be the expression of an exclusive sexual orientation but rather it was understood as excess on the part of those who could easily be content with heterosexual relationships, but who went beyond them in search of more exotic pleasures. So when the translation of malakoi and arsenokoites shifted in the 20th century to refer to people with same-sex orientation, "it fostered the mistaken belief that Paul was condemning a minority group with a different sexual orientation" when "in fact, he was condemning excessive and exploitive sexual conduct." Rachel Held
This is absolutely false.

The same words were used in ancient Greek translations of Leviticus. So Paul simply used the same words in the Greek version of Leviticus, when he wrote the Greek letter to the Corinthians.

This idea that the words of Paul were changed in the 20th century is a modern fabrication to try and justify something that is clearly a sin in both the Old and New Testaments of the Bible.
ShooterTX
whitetrash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

I Timothy 1: 10 Here's the key point to remember," writes Matthew. "Even if Paul had intended his words to be a condemnation of all forms of same-sex relations, the context in which he would have been making that statement would still differ significantly from our context today." That's because same-sex behavior in the first century was not understood to be the expression of an exclusive sexual orientation but rather it was understood as excess on the part of those who could easily be content with heterosexual relationships, but who went beyond them in search of more exotic pleasures. So when the translation of malakoi and arsenokoites shifted in the 20th century to refer to people with same-sex orientation, "it fostered the mistaken belief that Paul was condemning a minority group with a different sexual orientation" when "in fact, he was condemning excessive and exploitive sexual conduct." Rachel Held
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.