Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

No claim? You're being intellectually dishonest.

---

No, I am not being "intellectually dishonest." I am using only the arguments needed to demonstrate the point I am making. No claim as to the reality of the existence of God is needed.

---

oh please " the arguments needed to demonstrate the point on making" references an intellectual statement and is dishonest

---

You have shown nothing of mine here that is "dishonest."

Independent of the question of whether God exists, you cannot hold that the Christian God exists and that there is no supernatural.

You can have one or the other.

You cannot have both.

With a Christian view you cannot have both because the Christian God is not part of nature and the Christian God literally stepped into history in the person of Jesus, a person who walked this world as a physical man. There is no explanation other than an event that is outside the laws of nature, which makes it, by definition, supernatural.

The question of whether God in general or the Christian God in particular exists is entirely separate from whether you can believe in the Christian God and believe in materialism simultaneously.

---

Jesus of course by definition is a Supernatural being, he is God in the flesh, fully a human, yet fully God. This was a supernatural event. His birth was a Supernatural event. His resurrection was a Supernatural event.

If we don't believe this, we don't believe in God, but some other god.

---

So many people are going to pretend that they never humored the egregious trans stuff. They’ll pretend that it was always a minor thing, that it was never mainstream, and that they were not party to it.

But a lot of hurt kids will remember. https://t.co/U3tbe9MukQ

— ib (@Indian_Bronson) February 3, 2024

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

No claim? You're being intellectually dishonest.

---

No, I am not being "intellectually dishonest." I am using only the arguments needed to demonstrate the point I am making. No claim as to the reality of the existence of God is needed.

---

oh please " the arguments needed to demonstrate the point on making" references an intellectual statement and is dishonest

---

You have shown nothing of mine here that is "dishonest."

Independent of the question of whether God exists, you cannot hold that the Christian God exists and that there is no supernatural.

You can have one or the other.

You cannot have both.

With a Christian view you cannot have both because the Christian God is not part of nature and the Christian God literally stepped into history in the person of Jesus, a person who walked this world as a physical man. There is no explanation other than an event that is outside the laws of nature, which makes it, by definition, supernatural.

The question of whether God in general or the Christian God in particular exists is entirely separate from whether you can believe in the Christian God and believe in materialism simultaneously.

---

Jesus of course by definition is a Supernatural being, he is God in the flesh, fully a human, yet fully God. This was a supernatural event. His birth was a Supernatural event. His resurrection was a Supernatural event.

If we don't believe this, we don't believe in God, but some other god.

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

So many people are going to pretend that they never humored the egregious trans stuff. They’ll pretend that it was always a minor thing, that it was never mainstream, and that they were not party to it.

But a lot of hurt kids will remember. https://t.co/U3tbe9MukQ

— ib (@Indian_Bronson) February 3, 2024

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

No claim? You're being intellectually dishonest.

---

No, I am not being "intellectually dishonest." I am using only the arguments needed to demonstrate the point I am making. No claim as to the reality of the existence of God is needed.

---

oh please " the arguments needed to demonstrate the point on making" references an intellectual statement and is dishonest

---

You have shown nothing of mine here that is "dishonest."

Independent of the question of whether God exists, you cannot hold that the Christian God exists and that there is no supernatural.

You can have one or the other.

You cannot have both.

With a Christian view you cannot have both because the Christian God is not part of nature and the Christian God literally stepped into history in the person of Jesus, a person who walked this world as a physical man. There is no explanation other than an event that is outside the laws of nature, which makes it, by definition, supernatural.

The question of whether God in general or the Christian God in particular exists is entirely separate from whether you can believe in the Christian God and believe in materialism simultaneously.

---

Jesus of course by definition is a Supernatural being, he is God in the flesh, fully a human, yet fully God. This was a supernatural event. His birth was a Supernatural event. His resurrection was a Supernatural event.

If we don't believe this, we don't believe in God, but some other god.

---

The very few for you're trying to reach for the good news of Jesus Christ find that statement utterly nonsensical.

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

No claim? You're being intellectually dishonest.

---

No, I am not being "intellectually dishonest." I am using only the arguments needed to demonstrate the point I am making. No claim as to the reality of the existence of God is needed.

---

oh please " the arguments needed to demonstrate the point on making" references an intellectual statement and is dishonest

---

You have shown nothing of mine here that is "dishonest."

Independent of the question of whether God exists, you cannot hold that the Christian God exists and that there is no supernatural.

You can have one or the other.

You cannot have both.

With a Christian view you cannot have both because the Christian God is not part of nature and the Christian God literally stepped into history in the person of Jesus, a person who walked this world as a physical man. There is no explanation other than an event that is outside the laws of nature, which makes it, by definition, supernatural.

The question of whether God in general or the Christian God in particular exists is entirely separate from whether you can believe in the Christian God and believe in materialism simultaneously.

---

Jesus of course by definition is a Supernatural being, he is God in the flesh, fully a human, yet fully God. This was a supernatural event. His birth was a Supernatural event. His resurrection was a Supernatural event.

If we don't believe this, we don't believe in God, but some other god.

---

Jesus is not a superpower being like superman. The very few for you're trying to reach for the good news of Jesus Christ find that statement utterly nonsensical.

---

Your first sentence is correct. Superman is fictional, Jesus is the Son of God, a real, physical man.

Your second collection of words don't form a coherent sentence.

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

No claim? You're being intellectually dishonest.

---

No, I am not being "intellectually dishonest." I am using only the arguments needed to demonstrate the point I am making. No claim as to the reality of the existence of God is needed.

---

oh please " the arguments needed to demonstrate the point on making" references an intellectual statement and is dishonest

---

You have shown nothing of mine here that is "dishonest."

Independent of the question of whether God exists, you cannot hold that the Christian God exists and that there is no supernatural.

You can have one or the other.

You cannot have both.

With a Christian view you cannot have both because the Christian God is not part of nature and the Christian God literally stepped into history in the person of Jesus, a person who walked this world as a physical man. There is no explanation other than an event that is outside the laws of nature, which makes it, by definition, supernatural.

The question of whether God in general or the Christian God in particular exists is entirely separate from whether you can believe in the Christian God and believe in materialism simultaneously.

---

Jesus of course by definition is a Supernatural being, he is God in the flesh, fully a human, yet fully God. This was a supernatural event. His birth was a Supernatural event. His resurrection was a Supernatural event.

If we don't believe this, we don't believe in God, but some other god.

---

Jesus is not a superpower being like superman. The very few for you're trying to reach for the good news of Jesus Christ find that statement utterly nonsensical.

---

Your first sentence is correct. Superman is fictional, Jesus is the Son of God, a real, physical man.

Your second collection of words don't form a coherent sentence.

---

Jesus is historical, the son of God and a real physical man.
I am sorry for the incoherence. If you are trying to reach people with the good news of Jesus Christ then asking them to believe nonsense is stupid. Focus on who Jesus is for the us not some fantastical being that defies science.

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

No claim? You're being intellectually dishonest.

---

No, I am not being "intellectually dishonest." I am using only the arguments needed to demonstrate the point I am making. No claim as to the reality of the existence of God is needed.

---

oh please " the arguments needed to demonstrate the point on making" references an intellectual statement and is dishonest

---

You have shown nothing of mine here that is "dishonest."

Independent of the question of whether God exists, you cannot hold that the Christian God exists and that there is no supernatural.

You can have one or the other.

You cannot have both.

With a Christian view you cannot have both because the Christian God is not part of nature and the Christian God literally stepped into history in the person of Jesus, a person who walked this world as a physical man. There is no explanation other than an event that is outside the laws of nature, which makes it, by definition, supernatural.

The question of whether God in general or the Christian God in particular exists is entirely separate from whether you can believe in the Christian God and believe in materialism simultaneously.

---

Jesus of course by definition is a Supernatural being, he is God in the flesh, fully a human, yet fully God. This was a supernatural event. His birth was a Supernatural event. His resurrection was a Supernatural event.

If we don't believe this, we don't believe in God, but some other god.

---

Jesus is not a superpower being like superman. The very few for you're trying to reach for the good news of Jesus Christ find that statement utterly nonsensical.

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

No claim? You're being intellectually dishonest.

---

No, I am not being "intellectually dishonest." I am using only the arguments needed to demonstrate the point I am making. No claim as to the reality of the existence of God is needed.

---

oh please " the arguments needed to demonstrate the point on making" references an intellectual statement and is dishonest

---

You have shown nothing of mine here that is "dishonest."

Independent of the question of whether God exists, you cannot hold that the Christian God exists and that there is no supernatural.

You can have one or the other.

You cannot have both.

With a Christian view you cannot have both because the Christian God is not part of nature and the Christian God literally stepped into history in the person of Jesus, a person who walked this world as a physical man. There is no explanation other than an event that is outside the laws of nature, which makes it, by definition, supernatural.

The question of whether God in general or the Christian God in particular exists is entirely separate from whether you can believe in the Christian God and believe in materialism simultaneously.

---

Jesus of course by definition is a Supernatural being, he is God in the flesh, fully a human, yet fully God. This was a supernatural event. His birth was a Supernatural event. His resurrection was a Supernatural event.

If we don't believe this, we don't believe in God, but some other god.

---

Jesus is not a superpower being like superman. The very few for you're trying to reach for the good news of Jesus Christ find that statement utterly nonsensical.

---

Your first sentence is correct. Superman is fictional, Jesus is the Son of God, a real, physical man.

Your second collection of words don't form a coherent sentence.

---

Jesus is historical, the son of God and a real physical man.

---

🤡TransMaN is telling a mother that her 5 year old son is not detransitioning for wanting to wear masculine clothes.

The fact that the mother and this woman doesn’t see anything wrong with a “Trans 5 year old” is insane to me… pic.twitter.com/NDboSEiePX

— L G B (@L__G__B) February 5, 2024

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

No claim? You're being intellectually dishonest.

---

No, I am not being "intellectually dishonest." I am using only the arguments needed to demonstrate the point I am making. No claim as to the reality of the existence of God is needed.

---

oh please " the arguments needed to demonstrate the point on making" references an intellectual statement and is dishonest

---

You have shown nothing of mine here that is "dishonest."

Independent of the question of whether God exists, you cannot hold that the Christian God exists and that there is no supernatural.

You can have one or the other.

You cannot have both.

With a Christian view you cannot have both because the Christian God is not part of nature and the Christian God literally stepped into history in the person of Jesus, a person who walked this world as a physical man. There is no explanation other than an event that is outside the laws of nature, which makes it, by definition, supernatural.

The question of whether God in general or the Christian God in particular exists is entirely separate from whether you can believe in the Christian God and believe in materialism simultaneously.

---

Jesus of course by definition is a Supernatural being, he is God in the flesh, fully a human, yet fully God. This was a supernatural event. His birth was a Supernatural event. His resurrection was a Supernatural event.

If we don't believe this, we don't believe in God, but some other god.

---

Jesus is not a superpower being like superman. The very few for you're trying to reach for the good news of Jesus Christ find that statement utterly nonsensical.

---

Your first sentence is correct. Superman is fictional, Jesus is the Son of God, a real, physical man.

Your second collection of words don't form a coherent sentence.

---

Jesus is historical, the son of God and a real physical man.

---

So you acknowledge he was a real physical person. But you said God "sent" him. So how then did God "send" a physical person into our natural world, if he doesn't have the power to intervene in the natural world?

---

Waco1947 said:

---

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

No claim? You're being intellectually dishonest.

---

No, I am not being "intellectually dishonest." I am using only the arguments needed to demonstrate the point I am making. No claim as to the reality of the existence of God is needed.

---

oh please " the arguments needed to demonstrate the point on making" references an intellectual statement and is dishonest

---

You have shown nothing of mine here that is "dishonest."

Independent of the question of whether God exists, you cannot hold that the Christian God exists and that there is no supernatural.

You can have one or the other.

You cannot have both.

With a Christian view you cannot have both because the Christian God is not part of nature and the Christian God literally stepped into history in the person of Jesus, a person who walked this world as a physical man. There is no explanation other than an event that is outside the laws of nature, which makes it, by definition, supernatural.

The question of whether God in general or the Christian God in particular exists is entirely separate from whether you can believe in the Christian God and believe in materialism simultaneously.

---

Jesus of course by definition is a Supernatural being, he is God in the flesh, fully a human, yet fully God. This was a supernatural event. His birth was a Supernatural event. His resurrection was a Supernatural event.

If we don't believe this, we don't believe in God, but some other god.

---

Jesus is not a superpower being like superman. The very few for you're trying to reach for the good news of Jesus Christ find that statement utterly nonsensical.

---

Your first sentence is correct. Superman is fictional, Jesus is the Son of God, a real, physical man.

Your second collection of words don't form a coherent sentence.

---

Jesus is historical, the son of God and a real physical man.

---

So you acknowledge he was a real physical person. But you said God "sent" him. So how then did God "send" a physical person into our natural world, if he doesn't have the power to intervene in the natural world?

---

Ask and answered. You're being obtuse I have said repeatedly it has to do with the sacred and the spiritual not the supernatural.

---

Waco1947 said:

---

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

No claim? You're being intellectually dishonest.

---

No, I am not being "intellectually dishonest." I am using only the arguments needed to demonstrate the point I am making. No claim as to the reality of the existence of God is needed.

---

oh please " the arguments needed to demonstrate the point on making" references an intellectual statement and is dishonest

---

You have shown nothing of mine here that is "dishonest."

Independent of the question of whether God exists, you cannot hold that the Christian God exists and that there is no supernatural.

You can have one or the other.

You cannot have both.

With a Christian view you cannot have both because the Christian God is not part of nature and the Christian God literally stepped into history in the person of Jesus, a person who walked this world as a physical man. There is no explanation other than an event that is outside the laws of nature, which makes it, by definition, supernatural.

The question of whether God in general or the Christian God in particular exists is entirely separate from whether you can believe in the Christian God and believe in materialism simultaneously.

---

Jesus of course by definition is a Supernatural being, he is God in the flesh, fully a human, yet fully God. This was a supernatural event. His birth was a Supernatural event. His resurrection was a Supernatural event.

If we don't believe this, we don't believe in God, but some other god.

---

Jesus is not a superpower being like superman. The very few for you're trying to reach for the good news of Jesus Christ find that statement utterly nonsensical.

---

Your first sentence is correct. Superman is fictional, Jesus is the Son of God, a real, physical man.

Your second collection of words don't form a coherent sentence.

---

Jesus is historical, the son of God and a real physical man.

---

So you acknowledge he was a real physical person. But you said God "sent" him. So how then did God "send" a physical person into our natural world, if he doesn't have the power to intervene in the natural world?

---

Ask and answered. You're being obtuse I have said repeatedly it has to do with the sacred and the spiritual not the supernatural.

---

How messed up is this? This protester brought a shark stuffed animal to mock Bethany Hamilton who lost her arm to a shark.

Miserable, insufferable people. But oh so "tolerant" https://t.co/o2yP0gYhXH pic.twitter.com/TbMmY6Wnds

— Riley Gaines (@Riley_Gaines_) February 6, 2024

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

No claim? You're being intellectually dishonest.

---

No, I am not being "intellectually dishonest." I am using only the arguments needed to demonstrate the point I am making. No claim as to the reality of the existence of God is needed.

---

oh please " the arguments needed to demonstrate the point on making" references an intellectual statement and is dishonest

---

You have shown nothing of mine here that is "dishonest."

Independent of the question of whether God exists, you cannot hold that the Christian God exists and that there is no supernatural.

You can have one or the other.

You cannot have both.

With a Christian view you cannot have both because the Christian God is not part of nature and the Christian God literally stepped into history in the person of Jesus, a person who walked this world as a physical man. There is no explanation other than an event that is outside the laws of nature, which makes it, by definition, supernatural.

The question of whether God in general or the Christian God in particular exists is entirely separate from whether you can believe in the Christian God and believe in materialism simultaneously.

---

Jesus of course by definition is a Supernatural being, he is God in the flesh, fully a human, yet fully God. This was a supernatural event. His birth was a Supernatural event. His resurrection was a Supernatural event.

If we don't believe this, we don't believe in God, but some other god.

---

Jesus is not a superpower being like superman. The very few for you're trying to reach for the good news of Jesus Christ find that statement utterly nonsensical.

---

Your first sentence is correct. Superman is fictional, Jesus is the Son of God, a real, physical man.

Your second collection of words don't form a coherent sentence.

---

Jesus is historical, the son of God and a real physical man.

---

So you acknowledge he was a real physical person. But you said God "sent" him. So how then did God "send" a physical person into our natural world, if he doesn't have the power to intervene in the natural world?

---

Ask and answered. You're being obtuse I have said repeatedly it has to do with the sacred and the spiritual not the supernatural.

---

No, you didn't answer. Now you're lying, or you're just forgetful.

And the "answer" you're giving here - "it has to do with the sacred and the spiritual not the supernatural" is not an answer to the question. You're not explaining how the spiritual and the physical are connected. You obviously think they are connected, because you believe God, who you believe is spirit, "sent" Jesus, who you believe was a real, physical person. You can't believe this, unless you believe God can make something physically happen in the natural world. But your belief is that God CAN'T do this. These beliefs logically contradict each other, right?

So answer the question: if God doesn't have the power to make something happen in the physical world, then how did God make something happen in the physical world by "sending" Jesus?

---

Waco1947 said:

---

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

No claim? You're being intellectually dishonest.

---

No, I am not being "intellectually dishonest." I am using only the arguments needed to demonstrate the point I am making. No claim as to the reality of the existence of God is needed.

---

oh please " the arguments needed to demonstrate the point on making" references an intellectual statement and is dishonest

---

You have shown nothing of mine here that is "dishonest."

Independent of the question of whether God exists, you cannot hold that the Christian God exists and that there is no supernatural.

You can have one or the other.

You cannot have both.

With a Christian view you cannot have both because the Christian God is not part of nature and the Christian God literally stepped into history in the person of Jesus, a person who walked this world as a physical man. There is no explanation other than an event that is outside the laws of nature, which makes it, by definition, supernatural.

The question of whether God in general or the Christian God in particular exists is entirely separate from whether you can believe in the Christian God and believe in materialism simultaneously.

---

Jesus of course by definition is a Supernatural being, he is God in the flesh, fully a human, yet fully God. This was a supernatural event. His birth was a Supernatural event. His resurrection was a Supernatural event.

If we don't believe this, we don't believe in God, but some other god.

---

Jesus is not a superpower being like superman. The very few for you're trying to reach for the good news of Jesus Christ find that statement utterly nonsensical.

---

Your first sentence is correct. Superman is fictional, Jesus is the Son of God, a real, physical man.

Your second collection of words don't form a coherent sentence.

---

Jesus is historical, the son of God and a real physical man.

---

So you acknowledge he was a real physical person. But you said God "sent" him. So how then did God "send" a physical person into our natural world, if he doesn't have the power to intervene in the natural world?

---

Ask and answered. You're being obtuse I have said repeatedly it has to do with the sacred and the spiritual not the supernatural.

---

No, you didn't answer. Now you're lying, or you're just forgetful.

And the "answer" you're giving here - "it has to do with the sacred and the spiritual not the supernatural" is not an answer to the question. You're not explaining how the spiritual and the physical are connected. You obviously think they are connected, because you believe God, who you believe is spirit, "sent" Jesus, who you believe was a real, physical person. You can't believe this, unless you believe God can make something physically happen in the natural world. But your belief is that God CAN'T do this. These beliefs logically contradict each other, right?

So answer the question: if God doesn't have the power to make something happen in the physical world, then how did God make something happen in the physical world by "sending" Jesus?

---

Not lying You have yet to prove the
"supernatural".

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

No claim? You're being intellectually dishonest.

---

No, I am not being "intellectually dishonest." I am using only the arguments needed to demonstrate the point I am making. No claim as to the reality of the existence of God is needed.

---

oh please " the arguments needed to demonstrate the point on making" references an intellectual statement and is dishonest

---

You have shown nothing of mine here that is "dishonest."

Independent of the question of whether God exists, you cannot hold that the Christian God exists and that there is no supernatural.

You can have one or the other.

You cannot have both.

With a Christian view you cannot have both because the Christian God is not part of nature and the Christian God literally stepped into history in the person of Jesus, a person who walked this world as a physical man. There is no explanation other than an event that is outside the laws of nature, which makes it, by definition, supernatural.

The question of whether God in general or the Christian God in particular exists is entirely separate from whether you can believe in the Christian God and believe in materialism simultaneously.

---

Jesus of course by definition is a Supernatural being, he is God in the flesh, fully a human, yet fully God. This was a supernatural event. His birth was a Supernatural event. His resurrection was a Supernatural event.

If we don't believe this, we don't believe in God, but some other god.

---

Jesus is not a superpower being like superman. The very few for you're trying to reach for the good news of Jesus Christ find that statement utterly nonsensical.

---

Your first sentence is correct. Superman is fictional, Jesus is the Son of God, a real, physical man.

Your second collection of words don't form a coherent sentence.

---

Jesus is historical, the son of God and a real physical man.
I am sorry for the incoherence. If you are trying to reach people with the good news of Jesus Christ then asking them to believe nonsense is stupid. Focus on who Jesus is for the us not some fantastical being that defies science.

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Because you lay claim to it

---

Jack Bauer said:

---

"Love wins!"

How messed up is this? This protester brought a shark stuffed animal to mock Bethany Hamilton who lost her arm to a shark.

Miserable, insufferable people. But oh so "tolerant" https://t.co/o2yP0gYhXH pic.twitter.com/TbMmY6Wnds

— Riley Gaines (@Riley_Gaines_) February 6, 2024

---

Waco1947 said:

---

In my soul. Where does he live with you?

---

Teacher gets emotional discussing how proud she is that 8-year-olds correct other students on her gender and pronouns. pic.twitter.com/MmqRgclJzo

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) February 8, 2024

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Because you lay claim to it

---

You're laying claim to it by saying a spirit can make something happen in the physical world. That is supernatural power defined.

Now please quit dodging and answer the question. Realize that your theology is proven false if you can't answer it. Here it is again : if God doesn't have the power to make something happen in the physical world, then how did God make something happen in the physical world by "sending" Jesus?

---

Waco1947 said:

---

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Because you lay claim to it

---

You're laying claim to it by saying a spirit can make something happen in the physical world. That is supernatural power defined.

Now please quit dodging and answer the question. Realize that your theology is proven false if you can't answer it. Here it is again : if God doesn't have the power to make something happen in the physical world, then how did God make something happen in the physical world by "sending" Jesus?

---

Answer your own question. How does it happen?

---

Waco1947 said:

---

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Because you lay claim to it

---

You're laying claim to it by saying a spirit can make something happen in the physical world. That is supernatural power defined.

Now please quit dodging and answer the question. Realize that your theology is proven false if you can't answer it. Here it is again : if God doesn't have the power to make something happen in the physical world, then how did God make something happen in the physical world by "sending" Jesus?

---

Answer your own question. How does it happen?

---