Why can't young people afford houses?

96,562 Views | 1283 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by boognish_bear
BearlySpeaking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

BearlySpeaking said:

nein51 said:

That's probably accurate. Want to wipe out a ton of wealth and bankrupt probably 30% of the country? Have the value of their home drop by 38%. That will do it.
I'll be okay. My solution to the coming housing price drop was not to include my home in my investment planning to begin with. I either could afford to buy it as is and still be in line with my future financial goals or I couldn't, and its purpose in my life is to have a place to live, nothing more. If I benefit financially from my home somehow down the road, then that will be a bonus but I'm not counting on it.

That's just not the case for a huge number of home owners and for a lot of Americans the only real "wealth" they have is tied up in the value of their home.
That is not a smart financial move to have your financial future riding on a single real estate asset. It's better not to buy a piece of real estate as part of your investment planning if you don't have other adequate financial investments.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

The thread is about people buying new homes. People don't buy homes udon credit cards.

No but they buy homes out of their budget. Same thing
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That is often the case. It certainly does not explain all of them, however.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySpeaking said:

nein51 said:

BearlySpeaking said:

nein51 said:

That's probably accurate. Want to wipe out a ton of wealth and bankrupt probably 30% of the country? Have the value of their home drop by 38%. That will do it.
I'll be okay. My solution to the coming housing price drop was not to include my home in my investment planning to begin with. I either could afford to buy it as is and still be in line with my future financial goals or I couldn't, and its purpose in my life is to have a place to live, nothing more. If I benefit financially from my home somehow down the road, then that will be a bonus but I'm not counting on it.

That's just not the case for a huge number of home owners and for a lot of Americans the only real "wealth" they have is tied up in the value of their home.
That is not a smart financial move to have your financial future riding on a single real estate asset. It's better not to buy a piece of real estate as part of your investment planning if you don't have other adequate financial investments.

I just heard (maybe a week or two ago) that between 45-50% of most American's net worth is tied to the equity in their home. I wish I could remember where I heard it so I could grab the story for you.

Ie if the value of someone's home goes down by 50% so does their net worth.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

BearlySpeaking said:

nein51 said:

BearlySpeaking said:

nein51 said:

That's probably accurate. Want to wipe out a ton of wealth and bankrupt probably 30% of the country? Have the value of their home drop by 38%. That will do it.
I'll be okay. My solution to the coming housing price drop was not to include my home in my investment planning to begin with. I either could afford to buy it as is and still be in line with my future financial goals or I couldn't, and its purpose in my life is to have a place to live, nothing more. If I benefit financially from my home somehow down the road, then that will be a bonus but I'm not counting on it.

That's just not the case for a huge number of home owners and for a lot of Americans the only real "wealth" they have is tied up in the value of their home.
That is not a smart financial move to have your financial future riding on a single real estate asset. It's better not to buy a piece of real estate as part of your investment planning if you don't have other adequate financial investments.

I just heard (maybe a week or two ago) that between 45-50% of most American's net worth is tied to the equity in their home. I wish I could remember where I heard it so I could grab the story for you.

Ie if the value of someone's home goes down by 50% so does their net worth.
agreed. that is why I rent by choice. I'm a native Dallasite/Texan and find the property taxes on single family homes not a good investment unless you are raising a family. As an empty nester, renting makes more sense. I can make more investing $50K in property taxes than appreciation these days. Not to mention the serious cost of upkeep. For instance, my hot water heater went out in my apt. the other day and I had a brand new one the same day. In my home, that would have been a $5K ordeal. same when my fridge went out. Sure , taxes and repairs are baked into my rent, but a much better financial deal for me.
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

nein51 said:

BearlySpeaking said:

nein51 said:

BearlySpeaking said:

nein51 said:

That's probably accurate. Want to wipe out a ton of wealth and bankrupt probably 30% of the country? Have the value of their home drop by 38%. That will do it.
I'll be okay. My solution to the coming housing price drop was not to include my home in my investment planning to begin with. I either could afford to buy it as is and still be in line with my future financial goals or I couldn't, and its purpose in my life is to have a place to live, nothing more. If I benefit financially from my home somehow down the road, then that will be a bonus but I'm not counting on it.

That's just not the case for a huge number of home owners and for a lot of Americans the only real "wealth" they have is tied up in the value of their home.
That is not a smart financial move to have your financial future riding on a single real estate asset. It's better not to buy a piece of real estate as part of your investment planning if you don't have other adequate financial investments.

I just heard (maybe a week or two ago) that between 45-50% of most American's net worth is tied to the equity in their home. I wish I could remember where I heard it so I could grab the story for you.

Ie if the value of someone's home goes down by 50% so does their net worth.
agreed. that is why I rent by choice. I'm a native Dallasite/Texan and find the property taxes on single family homes not a good investment unless you are raising a family. As an empty nester, renting makes more sense. I can make more investing $50K in property taxes than appreciation these days. Not to mention the serious cost of upkeep. For instance, my hot water heater went out in my apt. the other day and I had a brand new one the same day. In my home, that would have been a $5K ordeal. same when my fridge went out. Sure , taxes and repairs are baked into my rent, but a much better financial deal for me.

If you already have some level of wealth owning a home is, for lack of a better term, a scam.

It does build equity and since most people have no money that equity has huge value. It also adds a layer of stability for most people.

However, when you factor repairs, maintenance and taxes (which most people pretend not to see) it's incredibly expensive.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

nein51 said:

BearlySpeaking said:

nein51 said:

BearlySpeaking said:

nein51 said:

That's probably accurate. Want to wipe out a ton of wealth and bankrupt probably 30% of the country? Have the value of their home drop by 38%. That will do it.
I'll be okay. My solution to the coming housing price drop was not to include my home in my investment planning to begin with. I either could afford to buy it as is and still be in line with my future financial goals or I couldn't, and its purpose in my life is to have a place to live, nothing more. If I benefit financially from my home somehow down the road, then that will be a bonus but I'm not counting on it.

That's just not the case for a huge number of home owners and for a lot of Americans the only real "wealth" they have is tied up in the value of their home.
That is not a smart financial move to have your financial future riding on a single real estate asset. It's better not to buy a piece of real estate as part of your investment planning if you don't have other adequate financial investments.

I just heard (maybe a week or two ago) that between 45-50% of most American's net worth is tied to the equity in their home. I wish I could remember where I heard it so I could grab the story for you.

Ie if the value of someone's home goes down by 50% so does their net worth.
agreed. that is why I rent by choice. I'm a native Dallasite/Texan and find the property taxes on single family homes not a good investment unless you are raising a family. As an empty nester, renting makes more sense. I can make more investing $50K in property taxes than appreciation these days. Not to mention the serious cost of upkeep. For instance, my hot water heater went out in my apt. the other day and I had a brand new one the same day. In my home, that would have been a $5K ordeal. same when my fridge went out. Sure , taxes and repairs are baked into my rent, but a much better financial deal for me.
Agree the property taxes in Texas are very high. Renting is a reasonable choice for empty nesters.

However I would not wish to be a landlord in Texas either. Quality of the tenants is just too risky.

For investment properties I prefer Wyoming and Colorado.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not sure if this is true or not

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

J.R. said:

nein51 said:

BearlySpeaking said:

nein51 said:

BearlySpeaking said:

nein51 said:

That's probably accurate. Want to wipe out a ton of wealth and bankrupt probably 30% of the country? Have the value of their home drop by 38%. That will do it.
I'll be okay. My solution to the coming housing price drop was not to include my home in my investment planning to begin with. I either could afford to buy it as is and still be in line with my future financial goals or I couldn't, and its purpose in my life is to have a place to live, nothing more. If I benefit financially from my home somehow down the road, then that will be a bonus but I'm not counting on it.

That's just not the case for a huge number of home owners and for a lot of Americans the only real "wealth" they have is tied up in the value of their home.
That is not a smart financial move to have your financial future riding on a single real estate asset. It's better not to buy a piece of real estate as part of your investment planning if you don't have other adequate financial investments.

I just heard (maybe a week or two ago) that between 45-50% of most American's net worth is tied to the equity in their home. I wish I could remember where I heard it so I could grab the story for you.

Ie if the value of someone's home goes down by 50% so does their net worth.
agreed. that is why I rent by choice. I'm a native Dallasite/Texan and find the property taxes on single family homes not a good investment unless you are raising a family. As an empty nester, renting makes more sense. I can make more investing $50K in property taxes than appreciation these days. Not to mention the serious cost of upkeep. For instance, my hot water heater went out in my apt. the other day and I had a brand new one the same day. In my home, that would have been a $5K ordeal. same when my fridge went out. Sure , taxes and repairs are baked into my rent, but a much better financial deal for me.
Agree the property taxes in Texas are very high. Renting is a reasonable choice for empty nesters.

However I would not wish to be a landlord in Texas either. Quality of the tenants is just too risky.

For investment properties I prefer Wyoming and Colorado.
agreed. I wouldn't want to be a landlord for a few single family houses. I'm in the multifamily business and thankfully we have the scale to employ mgt companies. I live in a high rise and really enjoy it.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

KaiBear said:

J.R. said:

nein51 said:

BearlySpeaking said:

nein51 said:

BearlySpeaking said:

nein51 said:

That's probably accurate. Want to wipe out a ton of wealth and bankrupt probably 30% of the country? Have the value of their home drop by 38%. That will do it.
I'll be okay. My solution to the coming housing price drop was not to include my home in my investment planning to begin with. I either could afford to buy it as is and still be in line with my future financial goals or I couldn't, and its purpose in my life is to have a place to live, nothing more. If I benefit financially from my home somehow down the road, then that will be a bonus but I'm not counting on it.

That's just not the case for a huge number of home owners and for a lot of Americans the only real "wealth" they have is tied up in the value of their home.
That is not a smart financial move to have your financial future riding on a single real estate asset. It's better not to buy a piece of real estate as part of your investment planning if you don't have other adequate financial investments.

I just heard (maybe a week or two ago) that between 45-50% of most American's net worth is tied to the equity in their home. I wish I could remember where I heard it so I could grab the story for you.

Ie if the value of someone's home goes down by 50% so does their net worth.
agreed. that is why I rent by choice. I'm a native Dallasite/Texan and find the property taxes on single family homes not a good investment unless you are raising a family. As an empty nester, renting makes more sense. I can make more investing $50K in property taxes than appreciation these days. Not to mention the serious cost of upkeep. For instance, my hot water heater went out in my apt. the other day and I had a brand new one the same day. In my home, that would have been a $5K ordeal. same when my fridge went out. Sure , taxes and repairs are baked into my rent, but a much better financial deal for me.
Agree the property taxes in Texas are very high. Renting is a reasonable choice for empty nesters.

However I would not wish to be a landlord in Texas either. Quality of the tenants is just too risky.

For investment properties I prefer Wyoming and Colorado.
agreed. I wouldn't want to be a landlord for a few single family houses. I'm in the multifamily business and thankfully we have the scale to employ mgt companies. I live in a high rise and really enjoy it.


Sincerely happy for you.

However if it was up to me I'd live full time in Buffalo Wyoming or maybe Sheridan.

On at least 35 acres.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Our escrow just went up $300 a month because of rising homeowner's insurance and increasing property values. We will be fine...but I don't know how a lot of young people could fade a fluctuation like that.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah, that Warren Buffett guy and Elon Musk guy are real dumbasses!!!LOL!!!
"Many people die at 25, but we don't bury them until they are 75." -- Benjamin Franklin
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Yeah, that Warren Buffett guy…real dumbasses!!!LOL!!!


Certainly not dumb

Just a strange thing to say about $20,000 dollar houses

That just really dates him.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I bought my house for $379k at a 3.25% interest rate. Between rent and property taxes, its almost $3000 a month.

Property taxes and insurance is too high. I blame state and local governments for overpaying contractors and not being frugal with what they purchase.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

I bought my house for $379k at a 3.25% interest rate. Between rent and property taxes, its almost $3000 a month.

Property taxes and insurance is too high. I blame state and local governments for overpaying contractors and not being frugal with what they purchase.



What do you mean by "rent"...or was that a typo?
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

Doc Holliday said:

I bought my house for $379k at a 3.25% interest rate. Between rent and property taxes, its almost $3000 a month.

Property taxes and insurance is too high. I blame state and local governments for overpaying contractors and not being frugal with what they purchase.



What do you mean by "rent"...or was that a typo?
Yeah meant mortgage
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've done my best to let my own kids know when it comes time to buy a house not to buy a house based on what a lender will finance you for...but based on what fits your current budget.

Seems like such an easy concept...but obviously way too many people are buying houses they can't really afford.

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Had lunch with my real estate agent today.

He was lamenting the frustration of working with 'buyers' who are angry they can't buy a 450k house………with less than a thousand dollars available in their bank accounts.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not sure that's unpopular. It's seems essentially inevitable
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
North Texas area not on here yet

nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
9% is nothing when you consider the values are probably 40/50% too high to start with.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.