Talarico vs Paxton

158,263 Views | 1811 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by boognish_bear
Bear_Fan254
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Notice he didn't say billionaire because that would indict himself, as well.

He has received 12+ million from, frequent visitor of a certain island, billionaire Reid Hoffman!
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

The_barBEARian said:

I find this clip so cringe and performative its actually hilarious:




He already has wisdom, strength and protection from being a crook and associating with same. Notice they didn't ask him to be honest and have integrity.

I could not stand there and let those mother****ers touch me. Not my thing.

Dracula hated being near a cross.

The undead are reputed to be very afraid of Holy Water.

So maybe no surprise Mitch doesn't want to be near Christian ministers.
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not a peep from regressive

They were/are so enamored with the Epstein files
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Crazy that any real conservative would vote for Greg Abbott... he replaced Texans with Indians
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Running from the debates was a huge mistake and unforced error by Paxton...
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Henessey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Jimmy T has always been quick to insinuate, while hiding his own flaws and sins.
I believe that's called "campaigning." I dunno, must be a new thing the kids are doing these days.

You don't exactly hear Paxton answering many questions about his long list of indiscretions.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:




The Bush-National Review neocon axis of evil would rather have a woke democrat like Talarico than Paxton.
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Are you not tired of your party's continual slide into corruption and despotism over the last decade? A lot of Republican voters are, and that doesn't make them "woke" or neo-whatever.

If Ken Paxton loses, I bet Texas Republicans don't nominate a scumbag like him again for a at least a generation, and that's how you get better candidates. Maybe that's a weak argument to the zealouts who lust for power above all else, but some of us do actually care about our country and how it's run.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK said:

Are you not tired of your party's continual slide into corruption and despotism over the last decade? A lot of Republican voters are, and that doesn't make them "woke" or neo-whatever.

If Ken Paxton loses, I bet Texas Republicans don't nominate a scumbag like him again for a at least a generation, and that's how you get better candidates. Maybe that's a weak argument to the zealouts who lust for power above all else, but some of us do actually care about our country and how it's run.


After decades I deregistered as a Republican. I no longer believe that either the Rs or Ds are capable of nominating candidates capable of addressing actual problems.
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK said:

Are you not tired of your party's continual slide into corruption and despotism over the last decade? A lot of Republican voters are, and that doesn't make them "woke" or neo-whatever.

If Ken Paxton loses, I bet Texas Republicans don't nominate a scumbag like him again for a at least a generation, and that's how you get better candidates. Maybe that's a weak argument to the zealouts who lust for power above all else, but some of us do actually care about our country and how it's run.

You just summarized the autopen presidency succinctly. and it makes me giggle when regressives, as yourself, try to speak the holier than tho shtick when the Clinton wrote the book on corruption decades ago.

You really need to pull your head out of your azz
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JusHappy2BeHere said:

GrowlTowel said:

JusHappy2BeHere said:

Danielsjackson114 said:

calling out the abuse of HB1 visas is racist?

Of course liberal loons always calling things they do not agree with as racist

As a Racist I assumed you would be fine with electing other racists... How about the fact that the man knows nothing about the Oil and Gas Industry?

Why are racists disqualified from serving in public office?

Not disqualified from running or for being voted for by deplorable racists like yourself.
They are just not getting the vote of thinking beings with a soul.

There are way, way more racists in your party than there are in mine.

You are that little ***** that actually believes yelling "racist!" wins an argument - it doesn't. And the word deplorable, lost your queen's election in 2016. Keep it up.

Have you ever had an original thought?
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK said:

Are you not tired of your party's continual slide into corruption and despotism over the last decade? A lot of Republican voters are, and that doesn't make them "woke" or neo-whatever.

If Ken Paxton loses, I bet Texas Republicans don't nominate a scumbag like him again for a at least a generation, and that's how you get better candidates. Maybe that's a weak argument to the zealouts who lust for power above all else, but some of us do actually care about our country and how it's run.

Are you aware of your party's slide over the last 40 years?

Funny thing about Republicans, their voters actually consider such things whereas you and your party just blindly do as told.
Robert Wilson
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Just a regular, moderate Texas dude. Lmao.
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Regressives still cannot see who he is lmao
TWD 1974
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Oldbear83 said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

We have a Senate race in Texas between Talarico Chuck Schumer and Elon Musk.

If you want to play that game, at least be honest.

Chuck is an ******* but he cannot fund races with billions. The add for crook Paxton (in the pocket of Elon) appeared on national tv last night during the Cowboys ad.

First, I will remind you that Paxton has zero convictions, so since I have not used any of the pejoratives I might against Talarico, maybe you can lay off just repeating unsupported claims about Paxton.

Second, you know Talarico poured a ton of money into ads most of this campaign, so it's more than a little dishonest to pretend he has not done so, simply because he ran out of $$.

And third, you choose to cheer for the Cowboys, you cannot complain about what comes with it.

Are you familiar with Cowboy fans? Hardly a complaint free demographic there...
“No eye has seen, no ear has heard, and no mind has imagined what God has prepared for those who love Him.” 1 Corinthians 2:9
TWD 1974
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



Just one of a career of verbal miscues that makes me thankful Ken did not attend Baylor Law School.
“No eye has seen, no ear has heard, and no mind has imagined what God has prepared for those who love Him.” 1 Corinthians 2:9
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Now he lost because of the Russians!

Aliceinbubbleland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cornyn lost because the Evangelical snake charmers came out in droves following their orders while the other 92% were too damned lazy to get to the polls and save Cornyn's Senate seat. Now look what we have.
Iran has Trump by his pu**y and no way they will let go
OffshoreBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I just learned Ken Paxton went to Baylor for undergrad and grad school.
I came for the rumors, stayed for the overreactions.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aliceinbubbleland said:

Cornyn lost because the Evangelical snake charmers came out in droves following their orders while the other 92% were too damned lazy to get to the polls and save Cornyn's Senate seat. Now look what we have.


I'm not an evangelical and I hate Cornyn. All conservatives do which is why he lost.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.