Talarico vs Paxton

156,699 Views | 1798 Replies | Last: 24 min ago by Realitybites
Bear_Fan254
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Notice he didn't say billionaire because that would indict himself, as well.

He has received 12+ million from, frequent visitor of a certain island, billionaire Reid Hoffman!
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

The_barBEARian said:

I find this clip so cringe and performative its actually hilarious:




He already has wisdom, strength and protection from being a crook and associating with same. Notice they didn't ask him to be honest and have integrity.

I could not stand there and let those mother****ers touch me. Not my thing.

Dracula hated being near a cross.

The undead are reputed to be very afraid of Holy Water.

So maybe no surprise Mitch doesn't want to be near Christian ministers.
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not a peep from regressive

They were/are so enamored with the Epstein files
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Crazy that any real conservative would vote for Greg Abbott... he replaced Texans with Indians
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Running from the debates was a huge mistake and unforced error by Paxton...
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Henessey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Jimmy T has always been quick to insinuate, while hiding his own flaws and sins.
I believe that's called "campaigning." I dunno, must be a new thing the kids are doing these days.

You don't exactly hear Paxton answering many questions about his long list of indiscretions.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:




The Bush-National Review neocon axis of evil would rather have a woke democrat like Talarico than Paxton.
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Are you not tired of your party's continual slide into corruption and despotism over the last decade? A lot of Republican voters are, and that doesn't make them "woke" or neo-whatever.

If Ken Paxton loses, I bet Texas Republicans don't nominate a scumbag like him again for a at least a generation, and that's how you get better candidates. Maybe that's a weak argument to the zealouts who lust for power above all else, but some of us do actually care about our country and how it's run.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK said:

Are you not tired of your party's continual slide into corruption and despotism over the last decade? A lot of Republican voters are, and that doesn't make them "woke" or neo-whatever.

If Ken Paxton loses, I bet Texas Republicans don't nominate a scumbag like him again for a at least a generation, and that's how you get better candidates. Maybe that's a weak argument to the zealouts who lust for power above all else, but some of us do actually care about our country and how it's run.


After decades I deregistered as a Republican. I no longer believe that either the Rs or Ds are capable of nominating candidates capable of addressing actual problems.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.