riflebear said:
HuMcK said:
riflebear said:
The words that come to mind are "retaliation" and "obstruction".
Trump didn't fire 4 of the 5. Non partisan investigators did. Even liberal IG said he's never seen anything like it what they tried to do. But keep digging and ignoring facts.
Why do liberals believe conspiracy theories that are so far out there but then completely ignore proven facts ?
I'm beginning to see TDS is real.
Investigators don't fire people, their (in this case Trump appointed) superiors do.
So much of this nonsense is the result of preying on laymen like you who aren't sophisticated enough to understand what's happening. That's not meant as an insult at all either, legal proceedings and procedure are complex and hard for non-lawyers to understand, so it makes sense for them to muddy the waters with this "illegal investigation" disinformation narrative by deceptively using terms of art and wrongfully conflating concepts (i.e. conflicts of interest and investigative bias). I can't blame them too much, it's probably what I would try to do if i was caught doing something as heavy as what these guys are accused of.
There was nothing improper about investigating Trump, even based only on publicly known info, that's just something you need to accept because no amount of wishful thinking will change it.