Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

OldBurlyBear86 said:

---

Right now we have less than 4% of the population committing almost 50% of the homicides in the US. Until that issue is resolved, all discussion of reform is a waste of time

---

We have a .00005 incidence of vote fraud and yet states all over the country are passing voter suppression laws to deal with it. If you want to see wasted reform efforts try looking there.

---

How very liberal of you... you think voter ID laws are voter suppression? Hell, you have to present your ID to get welfare, to get food stamps, to get section 8....

---

Facts aren't liberal or conservative. And Voter ID hasn't made a difference.

You probably think a wall will stop illegal entry.

---

Don't try to change the subject (as you try to do every single time)... we're talking about suppression. Voter ID laws do not equal voter suppression. Like I said, people need ID for almost everything.

---

LOL. How can it be changing the subject when I'm going back to a post that preceded Voter ID? The one where you thought prayer and ID and gods were banned.

And Voter ID suppresses about as many votes as the number of fraudulent votes it prvents. Winning!

---

And by the way, school sponsored prayer is banned... since the early 60s

---

Again, I never mentioned school sponsored prayer. If you think prayer was banned you are still wrong.

---

But it is....

So how about the schools be consistent and ban itself from teaching CRT, but allowing students to discuss it among themselves or learn about it on their own?

It's interesting that you think gov't restricting itself is "banning" ideas.

And as far as ID:

https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna10545387

at the very least, many school have suppressed the teaching of ID.... so banning bad, but suppressing good in your view?

---

Amazing that you're okay with Intelligent Design -it's a religious concept, not scientific.

If you're okay with that, then I'm sure you'd be okay with Sharia Law being taught in schools?

What happened to that, anyway? I was told it was going to take over America by some frequent posters on this very board. Maybe it got swept away with migrant caravans? Or promises of Mexico paying for the wall?

I swear, scared, wimpy, lazy folk who refuse to do the reading will fall for anything if FoxNews tells them to believe it.

---

LOL... kindly show me where I said I was for (or even okay) with teaching ID in school?

Just because I state a fact like schools are supressing ID in school, doesn't mean I'm for it, but I don't expect you to comprehend that - at all.

You're just a clown

---

What public schools are suppressing ID?

---

Go away dip***** Didn't I tell you I was done with you?

But to answer your question one last time, this isn't a complete list:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2015/10/28/student-said-teacher-taught-god-not-real/74727730/

https://www.truthandaction.org/elementary-school-teacher-bans-1st-graders-from-saying-jesus-or-god-says-nothing-about-allah/2/

https://www.godupdates.com/school-bans-jesus-christian-students-graduation-speech/

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/30/indiana-teacher-asks-first-graders-stop-talking-ab/

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/12/school-bans-girl-writing-about-god-lets-her-idoliz/

https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/christnewstoday/2020/11/religious-discrimination-school-bans-3rd-graders-jesus-loves-me-mask.html

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/school-we-have-a-right-to-ban-god

I'm done talking with your stupid ass. When you can admit that you're nothing more than leftist, maybe we can talk, but in the meantime, get lost.

---

Spot checked two of your links (despite the fact that none of them seem to hinge on science/ID), neither of them mention ID. And one of them didn't suppress anything. At all. A teacher tried and the school overruled her.

That was a lot of effort to shoot off blanks.

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

OldBurlyBear86 said:

---

Right now we have less than 4% of the population committing almost 50% of the homicides in the US. Until that issue is resolved, all discussion of reform is a waste of time

---

We have a .00005 incidence of vote fraud and yet states all over the country are passing voter suppression laws to deal with it. If you want to see wasted reform efforts try looking there.

---

How very liberal of you... you think voter ID laws are voter suppression? Hell, you have to present your ID to get welfare, to get food stamps, to get section 8....

---

Facts aren't liberal or conservative. And Voter ID hasn't made a difference.

You probably think a wall will stop illegal entry.

---

Don't try to change the subject (as you try to do every single time)... we're talking about suppression. Voter ID laws do not equal voter suppression. Like I said, people need ID for almost everything.

---

LOL. How can it be changing the subject when I'm going back to a post that preceded Voter ID? The one where you thought prayer and ID and gods were banned.

And Voter ID suppresses about as many votes as the number of fraudulent votes it prvents. Winning!

---

And by the way, school sponsored prayer is banned... since the early 60s

---

Again, I never mentioned school sponsored prayer. If you think prayer was banned you are still wrong.

---

But it is....

So how about the schools be consistent and ban itself from teaching CRT, but allowing students to discuss it among themselves or learn about it on their own?

It's interesting that you think gov't restricting itself is "banning" ideas.

And as far as ID:

https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna10545387

at the very least, many school have suppressed the teaching of ID.... so banning bad, but suppressing good in your view?

---

Amazing that you're okay with Intelligent Design -it's a religious concept, not scientific.

If you're okay with that, then I'm sure you'd be okay with Sharia Law being taught in schools?

What happened to that, anyway? I was told it was going to take over America by some frequent posters on this very board. Maybe it got swept away with migrant caravans? Or promises of Mexico paying for the wall?

I swear, scared, wimpy, lazy folk who refuse to do the reading will fall for anything if FoxNews tells them to believe it.

---

LOL... kindly show me where I said I was for (or even okay) with teaching ID in school?

Just because I state a fact like schools are supressing ID in school, doesn't mean I'm for it, but I don't expect you to comprehend that - at all.

You're just a clown

---

What public schools are suppressing ID?

---

Go away dip***** Didn't I tell you I was done with you?

But to answer your question one last time, this isn't a complete list:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2015/10/28/student-said-teacher-taught-god-not-real/74727730/

https://www.truthandaction.org/elementary-school-teacher-bans-1st-graders-from-saying-jesus-or-god-says-nothing-about-allah/2/

https://www.godupdates.com/school-bans-jesus-christian-students-graduation-speech/

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/30/indiana-teacher-asks-first-graders-stop-talking-ab/

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/12/school-bans-girl-writing-about-god-lets-her-idoliz/

https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/christnewstoday/2020/11/religious-discrimination-school-bans-3rd-graders-jesus-loves-me-mask.html

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/school-we-have-a-right-to-ban-god

I'm done talking with your stupid ass. When you can admit that you're nothing more than leftist, maybe we can talk, but in the meantime, get lost.

---

Spot checked two of your links (despite the fact that none of them seem to hinge on science/ID), neither of them mention ID. And one of them didn't suppress anything. At all. A teacher tried and the school overruled her.

That was a lot of effort to shoot off blanks.

---

What the hell do you think ID is about? Your constant need to "word" check everyone has grown old and frankly boring.

But hey, I'll make you happy. There are many schools or school boards or principals or teachers or staff that want to suppress or ban or discourage or prevent or prohibit or censor or restrict or forbid the discussion or teaching of intelligent design (ID) or God or Jesus or Christianity or the Bible or the good book or the Ten Commandments.

Wow, you're like a little gnat. Get lost, turd.

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

OldBurlyBear86 said:

---

Right now we have less than 4% of the population committing almost 50% of the homicides in the US. Until that issue is resolved, all discussion of reform is a waste of time

---

We have a .00005 incidence of vote fraud and yet states all over the country are passing voter suppression laws to deal with it. If you want to see wasted reform efforts try looking there.

---

How very liberal of you... you think voter ID laws are voter suppression? Hell, you have to present your ID to get welfare, to get food stamps, to get section 8....

---

Facts aren't liberal or conservative. And Voter ID hasn't made a difference.

You probably think a wall will stop illegal entry.

---

Don't try to change the subject (as you try to do every single time)... we're talking about suppression. Voter ID laws do not equal voter suppression. Like I said, people need ID for almost everything.

---

LOL. How can it be changing the subject when I'm going back to a post that preceded Voter ID? The one where you thought prayer and ID and gods were banned.

And Voter ID suppresses about as many votes as the number of fraudulent votes it prvents. Winning!

---

And by the way, school sponsored prayer is banned... since the early 60s

---

Again, I never mentioned school sponsored prayer. If you think prayer was banned you are still wrong.

---

But it is....

So how about the schools be consistent and ban itself from teaching CRT, but allowing students to discuss it among themselves or learn about it on their own?

It's interesting that you think gov't restricting itself is "banning" ideas.

And as far as ID:

https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna10545387

at the very least, many school have suppressed the teaching of ID.... so banning bad, but suppressing good in your view?

---

Amazing that you're okay with Intelligent Design -it's a religious concept, not scientific.

If you're okay with that, then I'm sure you'd be okay with Sharia Law being taught in schools?

What happened to that, anyway? I was told it was going to take over America by some frequent posters on this very board. Maybe it got swept away with migrant caravans? Or promises of Mexico paying for the wall?

I swear, scared, wimpy, lazy folk who refuse to do the reading will fall for anything if FoxNews tells them to believe it.

---

LOL... kindly show me where I said I was for (or even okay) with teaching ID in school?

Just because I state a fact like schools are supressing ID in school, doesn't mean I'm for it, but I don't expect you to comprehend that - at all.

You're just a clown

---

What public schools are suppressing ID?

---

Go away dip***** Didn't I tell you I was done with you?

But to answer your question one last time, this isn't a complete list:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2015/10/28/student-said-teacher-taught-god-not-real/74727730/

https://www.truthandaction.org/elementary-school-teacher-bans-1st-graders-from-saying-jesus-or-god-says-nothing-about-allah/2/

https://www.godupdates.com/school-bans-jesus-christian-students-graduation-speech/

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/30/indiana-teacher-asks-first-graders-stop-talking-ab/

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/12/school-bans-girl-writing-about-god-lets-her-idoliz/

https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/christnewstoday/2020/11/religious-discrimination-school-bans-3rd-graders-jesus-loves-me-mask.html

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/school-we-have-a-right-to-ban-god

I'm done talking with your stupid ass. When you can admit that you're nothing more than leftist, maybe we can talk, but in the meantime, get lost.

---

Spot checked two of your links (despite the fact that none of them seem to hinge on science/ID), neither of them mention ID. And one of them didn't suppress anything. At all. A teacher tried and the school overruled her.

That was a lot of effort to shoot off blanks.

---

What the hell do you think ID is about? Your constant need to "word" check everyone has grown old and frankly boring.

But hey, I'll make you happy. There are many schools or school boards or principals or teachers or staff that want to suppress or ban or discourage or prevent or prohibit or censor or restrict or forbid the discussion or teaching of intelligent design (ID) or God or Jesus or Christianity or the Bible or the good book or the Ten Commandments.

Wow, you're like a little gnat. Get lost, turd.

---

Yeah, I get why fact-checking (even the sources you provide) bothers you. This is the second time you've made a claim, gotten pegged on it, and then expanded the claim so that you can try to cover your dignity. Hey, it's your feels, and you seem to have plenty of them.

If you want to avoid conflicts with me just stick to facts. Real ones.

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

OldBurlyBear86 said:

---

Right now we have less than 4% of the population committing almost 50% of the homicides in the US. Until that issue is resolved, all discussion of reform is a waste of time

---

We have a .00005 incidence of vote fraud and yet states all over the country are passing voter suppression laws to deal with it. If you want to see wasted reform efforts try looking there.

---

How very liberal of you... you think voter ID laws are voter suppression? Hell, you have to present your ID to get welfare, to get food stamps, to get section 8....

---

Facts aren't liberal or conservative. And Voter ID hasn't made a difference.

You probably think a wall will stop illegal entry.

---

Don't try to change the subject (as you try to do every single time)... we're talking about suppression. Voter ID laws do not equal voter suppression. Like I said, people need ID for almost everything.

---

LOL. How can it be changing the subject when I'm going back to a post that preceded Voter ID? The one where you thought prayer and ID and gods were banned.

And Voter ID suppresses about as many votes as the number of fraudulent votes it prvents. Winning!

---

And by the way, school sponsored prayer is banned... since the early 60s

---

Again, I never mentioned school sponsored prayer. If you think prayer was banned you are still wrong.

---

But it is....

So how about the schools be consistent and ban itself from teaching CRT, but allowing students to discuss it among themselves or learn about it on their own?

It's interesting that you think gov't restricting itself is "banning" ideas.

And as far as ID:

https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna10545387

at the very least, many school have suppressed the teaching of ID.... so banning bad, but suppressing good in your view?

---

Amazing that you're okay with Intelligent Design -it's a religious concept, not scientific.

If you're okay with that, then I'm sure you'd be okay with Sharia Law being taught in schools?

What happened to that, anyway? I was told it was going to take over America by some frequent posters on this very board. Maybe it got swept away with migrant caravans? Or promises of Mexico paying for the wall?

I swear, scared, wimpy, lazy folk who refuse to do the reading will fall for anything if FoxNews tells them to believe it.

---

LOL... kindly show me where I said I was for (or even okay) with teaching ID in school?

Just because I state a fact like schools are supressing ID in school, doesn't mean I'm for it, but I don't expect you to comprehend that - at all.

You're just a clown

---

What public schools are suppressing ID?

---

Go away dip***** Didn't I tell you I was done with you?

But to answer your question one last time, this isn't a complete list:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2015/10/28/student-said-teacher-taught-god-not-real/74727730/

https://www.truthandaction.org/elementary-school-teacher-bans-1st-graders-from-saying-jesus-or-god-says-nothing-about-allah/2/

https://www.godupdates.com/school-bans-jesus-christian-students-graduation-speech/

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/30/indiana-teacher-asks-first-graders-stop-talking-ab/

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/12/school-bans-girl-writing-about-god-lets-her-idoliz/

https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/christnewstoday/2020/11/religious-discrimination-school-bans-3rd-graders-jesus-loves-me-mask.html

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/school-we-have-a-right-to-ban-god

I'm done talking with your stupid ass. When you can admit that you're nothing more than leftist, maybe we can talk, but in the meantime, get lost.

---

Spot checked two of your links (despite the fact that none of them seem to hinge on science/ID), neither of them mention ID. And one of them didn't suppress anything. At all. A teacher tried and the school overruled her.

That was a lot of effort to shoot off blanks.

---

What the hell do you think ID is about? Your constant need to "word" check everyone has grown old and frankly boring.

But hey, I'll make you happy. There are many schools or school boards or principals or teachers or staff that want to suppress or ban or discourage or prevent or prohibit or censor or restrict or forbid the discussion or teaching of intelligent design (ID) or God or Jesus or Christianity or the Bible or the good book or the Ten Commandments.

Wow, you're like a little gnat. Get lost, turd.

---

Yeah, I get why fact-checking (even the sources you provide) bothers you. This is the second time you've made a claim, gotten pegged on it, and then expanded the claim so that you can try to cover your dignity. Hey, it's your feels, and you seem to have plenty of them.

If you want to avoid conflicts with me just stick to facts. Real ones.

---

Like I said, your word checking is old and boring. Feeble attempt to try and win argument. What the hell did you think was meant by intelligent design, AI and the future of computing? Get a life.

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

OldBurlyBear86 said:

---

Right now we have less than 4% of the population committing almost 50% of the homicides in the US. Until that issue is resolved, all discussion of reform is a waste of time

---

We have a .00005 incidence of vote fraud and yet states all over the country are passing voter suppression laws to deal with it. If you want to see wasted reform efforts try looking there.

---

How very liberal of you... you think voter ID laws are voter suppression? Hell, you have to present your ID to get welfare, to get food stamps, to get section 8....

---

Facts aren't liberal or conservative. And Voter ID hasn't made a difference.

You probably think a wall will stop illegal entry.

---

Don't try to change the subject (as you try to do every single time)... we're talking about suppression. Voter ID laws do not equal voter suppression. Like I said, people need ID for almost everything.

---

LOL. How can it be changing the subject when I'm going back to a post that preceded Voter ID? The one where you thought prayer and ID and gods were banned.

And Voter ID suppresses about as many votes as the number of fraudulent votes it prvents. Winning!

---

And by the way, school sponsored prayer is banned... since the early 60s

---

Again, I never mentioned school sponsored prayer. If you think prayer was banned you are still wrong.

---

But it is....

So how about the schools be consistent and ban itself from teaching CRT, but allowing students to discuss it among themselves or learn about it on their own?

It's interesting that you think gov't restricting itself is "banning" ideas.

And as far as ID:

https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna10545387

at the very least, many school have suppressed the teaching of ID.... so banning bad, but suppressing good in your view?

---

Amazing that you're okay with Intelligent Design -it's a religious concept, not scientific.

If you're okay with that, then I'm sure you'd be okay with Sharia Law being taught in schools?

What happened to that, anyway? I was told it was going to take over America by some frequent posters on this very board. Maybe it got swept away with migrant caravans? Or promises of Mexico paying for the wall?

I swear, scared, wimpy, lazy folk who refuse to do the reading will fall for anything if FoxNews tells them to believe it.

---

LOL... kindly show me where I said I was for (or even okay) with teaching ID in school?

Just because I state a fact like schools are supressing ID in school, doesn't mean I'm for it, but I don't expect you to comprehend that - at all.

You're just a clown

---

What public schools are suppressing ID?

---

Go away dip***** Didn't I tell you I was done with you?

But to answer your question one last time, this isn't a complete list:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2015/10/28/student-said-teacher-taught-god-not-real/74727730/

https://www.truthandaction.org/elementary-school-teacher-bans-1st-graders-from-saying-jesus-or-god-says-nothing-about-allah/2/

https://www.godupdates.com/school-bans-jesus-christian-students-graduation-speech/

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/30/indiana-teacher-asks-first-graders-stop-talking-ab/

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/12/school-bans-girl-writing-about-god-lets-her-idoliz/

https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/christnewstoday/2020/11/religious-discrimination-school-bans-3rd-graders-jesus-loves-me-mask.html

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/school-we-have-a-right-to-ban-god

I'm done talking with your stupid ass. When you can admit that you're nothing more than leftist, maybe we can talk, but in the meantime, get lost.

---

Spot checked two of your links (despite the fact that none of them seem to hinge on science/ID), neither of them mention ID. And one of them didn't suppress anything. At all. A teacher tried and the school overruled her.

That was a lot of effort to shoot off blanks.

---

What the hell do you think ID is about? Your constant need to "word" check everyone has grown old and frankly boring.

But hey, I'll make you happy. There are many schools or school boards or principals or teachers or staff that want to suppress or ban or discourage or prevent or prohibit or censor or restrict or forbid the discussion or teaching of intelligent design (ID) or God or Jesus or Christianity or the Bible or the good book or the Ten Commandments.

Wow, you're like a little gnat. Get lost, turd.

---

Yeah, I get why fact-checking (even the sources you provide) bothers you. This is the second time you've made a claim, gotten pegged on it, and then expanded the claim so that you can try to cover your dignity. Hey, it's your feels, and you seem to have plenty of them.

If you want to avoid conflicts with me just stick to facts. Real ones.

---

Like I said, your word checking is old and boring. Feeble attempt to try and win argument. What the hell did you think was meant by intelligent design, AI and the future of computing? Get a life.

---

ID is not about AI and the future of computing. It is a religious critique of evolution. And it is not banned.

I think what has you confused is that some states tried to force schools to teach ID as science, but that didn't fly with the First Amendment.

Rawhide said:

---

Quote:

---

ID is not about AI and the future of computing. It is a religious critique of evolution. And it is not banned.

I think what has you confused is that some states tried to force schools to teach ID as science, but that didn't fly with the First Amendment.

---

Good grief squish, give it a rest. You lost the argument. It doesn't matter which damn class it can or cannot be mentioned - and reason doesn't matter.> I hear you, you've made that clear.

The fact is that it was banned, barred, suppressed, prohibited, not allowed, restricted or whatever the f-u-c-k you want me to call it, since you hold the word salad monitor badge.

You said it wasn't banned. I provided a link to show you are wrong. I'm done with this argument with you

https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5062768

Reply all you all want. I won't.

---

"I think what has you confused is that some states tried to force schools to teach ID as science, but that didn't fly with the First Amendment."

Your link:
"Dover Area School Board members violated the Constitution when they ordered that its biology curriculum must include the notion that life on Earth was produced by an unidentified intelligent cause, U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III said."

See? Not banned, just prevented from forcing it on students in a biology class. As I said.

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

Quote:

---

ID is not about AI and the future of computing. It is a religious critique of evolution. And it is not banned.

I think what has you confused is that some states tried to force schools to teach ID as science, but that didn't fly with the First Amendment.

---

Good grief squish, give it a rest. You lost the argument. It doesn't matter which damn class it can or cannot be mentioned - and reason doesn't matter.> I hear you, you've made that clear.

The fact is that it was banned, barred, suppressed, prohibited, not allowed, restricted or whatever the f-u-c-k you want me to call it, since you hold the word salad monitor badge.

You said it wasn't banned. I provided a link to show you are wrong. I'm done with this argument with you

https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5062768

Reply all you all want. I won't.

---

"I think what has you confused is that some states tried to force schools to teach ID as science, but that didn't fly with the First Amendment."

Your link:
"Dover Area School Board members violated the Constitution when they ordered that its biology curriculum must include the notion that life on Earth was produced by an unidentified intelligent cause, U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III said."

See? Not banned, just prevented from forcing it on students in a biology class. As I said.

---

"Intelligent design" cannot be mentioned in biology classes in a Pennsylvania public school district, a federal judge said Tuesday, ruling in one of the biggest courtroom clashes on evolution since the 1925 Scopes trial

Banned. My last word on this subject.

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

Quote:

---

ID is not about AI and the future of computing. It is a religious critique of evolution. And it is not banned.

I think what has you confused is that some states tried to force schools to teach ID as science, but that didn't fly with the First Amendment.

---

Good grief squish, give it a rest. You lost the argument. It doesn't matter which damn class it can or cannot be mentioned - and reason doesn't matter.> I hear you, you've made that clear.

The fact is that it was banned, barred, suppressed, prohibited, not allowed, restricted or whatever the f-u-c-k you want me to call it, since you hold the word salad monitor badge.

You said it wasn't banned. I provided a link to show you are wrong. I'm done with this argument with you

https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5062768

Reply all you all want. I won't.

---

"I think what has you confused is that some states tried to force schools to teach ID as science, but that didn't fly with the First Amendment."

Your link:
"Dover Area School Board members violated the Constitution when they ordered that its biology curriculum must include the notion that life on Earth was produced by an unidentified intelligent cause, U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III said."

See? Not banned, just prevented from forcing it on students in a biology class. As I said.

---

"Intelligent design" cannot be mentioned in biology classes in a Pennsylvania public school district, a federal judge said Tuesday, ruling in one of the biggest courtroom clashes on evolution since the 1925 Scopes trial

Banned. My last word on this subject.

---

You quoted the reporter, I quoted the judge.

Guess who is right?

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

Quote:

---

ID is not about AI and the future of computing. It is a religious critique of evolution. And it is not banned.

I think what has you confused is that some states tried to force schools to teach ID as science, but that didn't fly with the First Amendment.

---

Good grief squish, give it a rest. You lost the argument. It doesn't matter which damn class it can or cannot be mentioned - and reason doesn't matter.> I hear you, you've made that clear.

The fact is that it was banned, barred, suppressed, prohibited, not allowed, restricted or whatever the f-u-c-k you want me to call it, since you hold the word salad monitor badge.

You said it wasn't banned. I provided a link to show you are wrong. I'm done with this argument with you

https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5062768

Reply all you all want. I won't.

---

"I think what has you confused is that some states tried to force schools to teach ID as science, but that didn't fly with the First Amendment."

Your link:
"Dover Area School Board members violated the Constitution when they ordered that its biology curriculum must include the notion that life on Earth was produced by an unidentified intelligent cause, U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III said."

See? Not banned, just prevented from forcing it on students in a biology class. As I said.

---

"Intelligent design" cannot be mentioned in biology classes in a Pennsylvania public school district, a federal judge said Tuesday, ruling in one of the biggest courtroom clashes on evolution since the 1925 Scopes trial

Banned. My last word on this subject.

---

You quoted the reporter, I quoted the judge.

Guess who is right?

---

Give it up squish. Judge ruled it unconstitutional and can't be taught in school = banned. You're desperation in trying to argue minute details is embarrassing.

You lost clown, take your licks and move on.

---

He said no such thing. He said the state cannot FORCE the teaching of ID. That forcing the teaching of a religious concept in a science class was a violation of the Constitution. That is absolutely not a ban. Quote the opinion (that you brought up, good catch) where it says that teaching ID is banned.

Rawhide said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

OldBurlyBear86 said:

---

Right now we have less than 4% of the population committing almost 50% of the homicides in the US. Until that issue is resolved, all discussion of reform is a waste of time

---

We have a .00005 incidence of vote fraud and yet states all over the country are passing voter suppression laws to deal with it. If you want to see wasted reform efforts try looking there.

---

How very liberal of you... you think voter ID laws are voter suppression? Hell, you have to present your ID to get welfare, to get food stamps, to get section 8....

---

Why do you keep saying "liberal" as if it's a bad word? It isn't.

Liberals freed the slaves. Liberals were the ones that made sure women had their right to vote. Liberals were the ones who wanted to support the Allies in WWII, and they were the ones who built the greatest economy the world has ever seen.

And Conservatives fought them on each of these things every step of the way. They're also the ones who have slowly but surely hamstrung the economy, nurtured the wealth gap, cut away rights, and are actively trying to overturn the lawfully elected government.

If you and the Trump crowd are "conservative" then I don't want to be anything like that. Nothing has done more to make me more liberal than this board. People on here who honestly think that Police being shot by bad people while doing a job they signed up for, is the same as innocent civilians being shot by Police while sleeping in their beds? I'll vote Democrat JUST to cancel out YOUR vote.

---

I don't believe you vote. I don't think you're old enough.

---

Weren't you the one who brought up suppression of ID?

I feel like you probably get asked this a lot, but, are you ok?

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

Quote:

---

ID is not about AI and the future of computing. It is a religious critique of evolution. And it is not banned.

I think what has you confused is that some states tried to force schools to teach ID as science, but that didn't fly with the First Amendment.

---

Good grief squish, give it a rest. You lost the argument. It doesn't matter which damn class it can or cannot be mentioned - and reason doesn't matter.> I hear you, you've made that clear.

The fact is that it was banned, barred, suppressed, prohibited, not allowed, restricted or whatever the f-u-c-k you want me to call it, since you hold the word salad monitor badge.

You said it wasn't banned. I provided a link to show you are wrong. I'm done with this argument with you

https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5062768

Reply all you all want. I won't.

---

"I think what has you confused is that some states tried to force schools to teach ID as science, but that didn't fly with the First Amendment."

Your link:
"Dover Area School Board members violated the Constitution when they ordered that its biology curriculum must include the notion that life on Earth was produced by an unidentified intelligent cause, U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III said."

See? Not banned, just prevented from forcing it on students in a biology class. As I said.

---

"Intelligent design" cannot be mentioned in biology classes in a Pennsylvania public school district, a federal judge said Tuesday, ruling in one of the biggest courtroom clashes on evolution since the 1925 Scopes trial

Banned. My last word on this subject.

---

You quoted the reporter, I quoted the judge.

Guess who is right?

---

Give it up squish. Judge ruled it unconstitutional and can't be taught in school = banned. You're desperation in trying to argue minute details is embarrassing.

You lost clown, take your licks and move on.

---

You're wrong. You don't have to understand it, but Quash just proved it.

And the fact none of your crazy friends backed you up and you ghosted means you probably actually DO understand it.

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

Quote:

---

ID is not about AI and the future of computing. It is a religious critique of evolution. And it is not banned.

I think what has you confused is that some states tried to force schools to teach ID as science, but that didn't fly with the First Amendment.

---

Good grief squish, give it a rest. You lost the argument. It doesn't matter which damn class it can or cannot be mentioned - and reason doesn't matter.> I hear you, you've made that clear.

The fact is that it was banned, barred, suppressed, prohibited, not allowed, restricted or whatever the f-u-c-k you want me to call it, since you hold the word salad monitor badge.

You said it wasn't banned. I provided a link to show you are wrong. I'm done with this argument with you

https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5062768

Reply all you all want. I won't.

---

"I think what has you confused is that some states tried to force schools to teach ID as science, but that didn't fly with the First Amendment."

Your link:
"Dover Area School Board members violated the Constitution when they ordered that its biology curriculum must include the notion that life on Earth was produced by an unidentified intelligent cause, U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III said."

See? Not banned, just prevented from forcing it on students in a biology class. As I said.

---

"Intelligent design" cannot be mentioned in biology classes in a Pennsylvania public school district, a federal judge said Tuesday, ruling in one of the biggest courtroom clashes on evolution since the 1925 Scopes trial

Banned. My last word on this subject.

---

You quoted the reporter, I quoted the judge.

Guess who is right?

---

Give it up squish. Judge ruled it unconstitutional and can't be taught in school = banned. You're desperation in trying to argue minute details is embarrassing.

You lost clown, take your licks and move on.

---

You're wrong. You don't have to understand it, but Quash just proved it.

And the fact none of your crazy friends backed you up and you ghosted means you probably actually DO understand it.

---

LOL... you're such a turd brooks

Rawhide said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

Quote:

---

ID is not about AI and the future of computing. It is a religious critique of evolution. And it is not banned.

I think what has you confused is that some states tried to force schools to teach ID as science, but that didn't fly with the First Amendment.

---

Good grief squish, give it a rest. You lost the argument. It doesn't matter which damn class it can or cannot be mentioned - and reason doesn't matter.> I hear you, you've made that clear.

The fact is that it was banned, barred, suppressed, prohibited, not allowed, restricted or whatever the f-u-c-k you want me to call it, since you hold the word salad monitor badge.

You said it wasn't banned. I provided a link to show you are wrong. I'm done with this argument with you

https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5062768

Reply all you all want. I won't.

---

"I think what has you confused is that some states tried to force schools to teach ID as science, but that didn't fly with the First Amendment."

Your link:
"Dover Area School Board members violated the Constitution when they ordered that its biology curriculum must include the notion that life on Earth was produced by an unidentified intelligent cause, U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III said."

See? Not banned, just prevented from forcing it on students in a biology class. As I said.

---

"Intelligent design" cannot be mentioned in biology classes in a Pennsylvania public school district, a federal judge said Tuesday, ruling in one of the biggest courtroom clashes on evolution since the 1925 Scopes trial

Banned. My last word on this subject.

---

You quoted the reporter, I quoted the judge.

Guess who is right?

---

Give it up squish. Judge ruled it unconstitutional and can't be taught in school = banned. You're desperation in trying to argue minute details is embarrassing.

You lost clown, take your licks and move on.

---

You're wrong. You don't have to understand it, but Quash just proved it.

And the fact none of your crazy friends backed you up and you ghosted means you probably actually DO understand it.

---

LOL... you're such a turd brooks

---

Yeah. You know you were owned, lol. That's why you didn't even try to argue.

You're not even entertaining anymore. Just sad.

Doc Holliday said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

Quote:

---

ID is not about AI and the future of computing. It is a religious critique of evolution. And it is not banned.

I think what has you confused is that some states tried to force schools to teach ID as science, but that didn't fly with the First Amendment.

---

Good grief squish, give it a rest. You lost the argument. It doesn't matter which damn class it can or cannot be mentioned - and reason doesn't matter.> I hear you, you've made that clear.

The fact is that it was banned, barred, suppressed, prohibited, not allowed, restricted or whatever the f-u-c-k you want me to call it, since you hold the word salad monitor badge.

You said it wasn't banned. I provided a link to show you are wrong. I'm done with this argument with you

https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5062768

Reply all you all want. I won't.

---

"I think what has you confused is that some states tried to force schools to teach ID as science, but that didn't fly with the First Amendment."

Your link:
"Dover Area School Board members violated the Constitution when they ordered that its biology curriculum must include the notion that life on Earth was produced by an unidentified intelligent cause, U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III said."

See? Not banned, just prevented from forcing it on students in a biology class. As I said.

---

"Intelligent design" cannot be mentioned in biology classes in a Pennsylvania public school district, a federal judge said Tuesday, ruling in one of the biggest courtroom clashes on evolution since the 1925 Scopes trial

Banned. My last word on this subject.

---

You quoted the reporter, I quoted the judge.

Guess who is right?

---

Give it up squish. Judge ruled it unconstitutional and can't be taught in school = banned. You're desperation in trying to argue minute details is embarrassing.

You lost clown, take your licks and move on.

---

You're wrong. You don't have to understand it, but Quash just proved it.

And the fact none of your crazy friends backed you up and you ghosted means you probably actually DO understand it.

---

LOL... you're such a turd brooks

---

Yeah. You know you were owned, lol. That's why you didn't even try to argue.

You're not even entertaining anymore. Just sad.

---

You didn't make an argument.

---

He's just a little gnat's nut looking to stir people up. His mom must've grounded him from playing outside with his imaginary friends.

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

quash said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

Quote:

---

ID is not about AI and the future of computing. It is a religious critique of evolution. And it is not banned.

I think what has you confused is that some states tried to force schools to teach ID as science, but that didn't fly with the First Amendment.

---

Good grief squish, give it a rest. You lost the argument. It doesn't matter which damn class it can or cannot be mentioned - and reason doesn't matter.> I hear you, you've made that clear.

The fact is that it was banned, barred, suppressed, prohibited, not allowed, restricted or whatever the f-u-c-k you want me to call it, since you hold the word salad monitor badge.

You said it wasn't banned. I provided a link to show you are wrong. I'm done with this argument with you

https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5062768

Reply all you all want. I won't.

---

"I think what has you confused is that some states tried to force schools to teach ID as science, but that didn't fly with the First Amendment."

Your link:
"Dover Area School Board members violated the Constitution when they ordered that its biology curriculum must include the notion that life on Earth was produced by an unidentified intelligent cause, U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III said."

See? Not banned, just prevented from forcing it on students in a biology class. As I said.

---

"Intelligent design" cannot be mentioned in biology classes in a Pennsylvania public school district, a federal judge said Tuesday, ruling in one of the biggest courtroom clashes on evolution since the 1925 Scopes trial

Banned. My last word on this subject.

---

You quoted the reporter, I quoted the judge.

Guess who is right?

---

Give it up squish. Judge ruled it unconstitutional and can't be taught in school = banned. You're desperation in trying to argue minute details is embarrassing.

You lost clown, take your licks and move on.

---

You're wrong. You don't have to understand it, but Quash just proved it.

And the fact none of your crazy friends backed you up and you ghosted means you probably actually DO understand it.

---

LOL... you're such a turd brooks

---

Yeah. You know you were owned, lol. That's why you didn't even try to argue.

You're not even entertaining anymore. Just sad.

---

You didn't make an argument.

---

Oh look who came in from the Michael Flynn fan club meeting! Remember when you said he'd have his convictions overturned?

Remember when you went on and on about what a Patriot he was before he started talking about coups and overthrowing the lawful government?

It wasn't my argument that rawhide got owned on. It was him claiming it is against the law to teach ID when it literally isn't. It's against the law to FORCE teaching of ID.

He said the judge said something he didn't, and quash proved it.

---

I didn't defend Michael Flynn because of his politics, but because he was set up. And even if convicted, is it a big deal? I mean the guy who altered an email to entrap Carter Page got a slap on the wrist.

You would defend FBI stasi tactics as a far leftist lol

I honestly don't really care about their spat, but you made no argument, you're just outraged.

How many have been injured or killed by police when following orders after breaking the law?

How dare you blame those committing the crime! The Biden Administration and DOJ have identified who really is to blame!

https://humanevents.com/2021/07/16/scoop-biden-doj-presentation-teaches-that-inner-city-violence-caused-by-white-supremacist-ideology-racism-and-police/?fbclid=IwAR2QCOnW1i4nLIfuMNX-VuS5_aRouoHrS2pdpLg_TscTwSY15NXgQwzXRmQ

jupiter said:

---

---

How many cops in Northern Europe are confronted with guns?

Norway allows gun ownership (lots of hunters) but even their murderers prefer stab weapons.

About a third of Germans own guns.

Finland is about the same on both counts.

US cops could certainly use more training, and they don't need to be sent on mental health calls, and there is absolutely no reason to use SWAT when arresting a non-violent drug offender, and we lost the drug war. But there are still a lot of calls where the target is armed and far more willing to shoot at a cop than Euros.

GShack said:

---

jupiter said:

---

---

What is the black population of each of those countries?

US 46M
Germany 1M
Norway/Finland <1M

---

So... it's black people's fault that we require so little expertise and training in our police forces?

SIC EM 94 said:

---

How dare you blame those committing the crime! The Biden Administration and DOJ have identified who really is to blame!

https://humanevents.com/2021/07/16/scoop-biden-doj-presentation-teaches-that-inner-city-violence-caused-by-white-supremacist-ideology-racism-and-police/?fbclid=IwAR2QCOnW1i4nLIfuMNX-VuS5_aRouoHrS2pdpLg_TscTwSY15NXgQwzXRmQ

---

Please let me know if you fact-checked this before sending this out.

I want to know if you read this and thought of challenging ANY part of it as factual or realistic.

If you didn't, then you are just desperate to be lied to.

BrooksBearLives said:

---

GShack said:

---

jupiter said:

---

---

What is the black population of each of those countries?

US 46M
Germany 1M
Norway/Finland <1M

---

So... it's black people's fault that we require so little expertise and training in our police forces?

---

We don't require so little training. The average police officer training is 840 hours or 21 weeks.

Officers are up against criminals that have spent nearly a lifetime robbing, looting, stealing, beating, intimidating, killing, maiming, misleading, lying, shooting, knifing, ganging up on and the list goes on and on and on. Picture George Floyd, your hero. He started thug life training early and it killed him.



We are way too soft on criminals......black, brown, white, red, yellow and tan. The police officers are not trained enough for modern day criminals. It's impossible. Thug life is constant once they choose that path and it knocks out 21 weeks in no time.

We need to treat thug life with a band of Atilla the Hun devotees or Comanche Indians. Police officers are too soft for thugs.

Thee University said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

GShack said:

---

jupiter said:

---

---

What is the black population of each of those countries?

US 46M
Germany 1M
Norway/Finland <1M

---

So... it's black people's fault that we require so little expertise and training in our police forces?

---

We don't require so little training. The average police officer training is 840 hours or 21 weeks.

Officers are up against criminals that have spent nearly a lifetime robbing, looting, stealing, beating, intimidating, killing, maiming, misleading, lying, shooting, knifing, ganging up on and the list goes on and on and on. Picture George Floyd, your hero. He started thug life training early and it killed him.



We are way too soft on criminals......black, brown, white, red, yellow and tan. The police officers are not trained enough for modern day criminals. It's impossible. Thug life is constant once they choose that path and it knocks out 21 weeks in no time.

We need to treat thug life with a band of Atilla the Hun devotees or Comanche Indians. Police officers are too soft for thugs.

---

Which part of the Constitution do you want to burn first?

BrooksBearLives said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

How dare you blame those committing the crime! The Biden Administration and DOJ have identified who really is to blame!

https://humanevents.com/2021/07/16/scoop-biden-doj-presentation-teaches-that-inner-city-violence-caused-by-white-supremacist-ideology-racism-and-police/?fbclid=IwAR2QCOnW1i4nLIfuMNX-VuS5_aRouoHrS2pdpLg_TscTwSY15NXgQwzXRmQ

---

Please let me know if you fact-checked this before sending this out.

I want to know if you read this and thought of challenging ANY part of it as factual or realistic.

If you didn't, then you are just desperate to be lied to.

---

Fact check it yourself. Go to the link and scroll down to see the referenced slides. To dumb it down for idiots like yourself, I'll attach the YouTube link of the entire presentation as well. Just try not to climax too quickly as you watch the BS unfold.

SIC EM 94 said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

How dare you blame those committing the crime! The Biden Administration and DOJ have identified who really is to blame!

https://humanevents.com/2021/07/16/scoop-biden-doj-presentation-teaches-that-inner-city-violence-caused-by-white-supremacist-ideology-racism-and-police/?fbclid=IwAR2QCOnW1i4nLIfuMNX-VuS5_aRouoHrS2pdpLg_TscTwSY15NXgQwzXRmQ

---

Please let me know if you fact-checked this before sending this out.

I want to know if you read this and thought of challenging ANY part of it as factual or realistic.

If you didn't, then you are just desperate to be lied to.

---

Fact check it yourself. Go to the link and scroll down to see the referenced slides. To dumb it down for idiots like yourself, I'll attach the YouTube link of the entire presentation as well. Just try not to climax too quickly as you watch the BS unfold.

---

Okay, so a presentation by a private school researcher presented to a limited amount of folks is.... your smoking gun that Biden is trying to schools?

You're not good at this. The video features multiple people who were hired to the NJI in 2019 or earlier. So that means Biden is SO POWERFUL that he placed these people in positions of power during the Trump administration.

So is Biden that powerful? Or does he have diminished mental capacitaty? I can't keep up with your BS.

Also, I know you didn't watch that whole video. Guess how I know that?

Canon said:

---

quash said:

---

Thee University said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

GShack said:

---

jupiter said:

---

---

What is the black population of each of those countries?

US 46M
Germany 1M
Norway/Finland <1M

---

So... it's black people's fault that we require so little expertise and training in our police forces?

---

We don't require so little training. The average police officer training is 840 hours or 21 weeks.

Officers are up against criminals that have spent nearly a lifetime robbing, looting, stealing, beating, intimidating, killing, maiming, misleading, lying, shooting, knifing, ganging up on and the list goes on and on and on. Picture George Floyd, your hero. He started thug life training early and it killed him.



We are way too soft on criminals......black, brown, white, red, yellow and tan. The police officers are not trained enough for modern day criminals. It's impossible. Thug life is constant once they choose that path and it knocks out 21 weeks in no time.

We need to treat thug life with a band of Atilla the Hun devotees or Comanche Indians. Police officers are too soft for thugs.

---

Which part of the Constitution do you want to burn first?

---

Let's just burn violent thugs instead.

---

Unlimited open borders and unlimited drugs of any kind for all. What could possibly go wrong? LOL!!!