D. C. Bear said:
Mothra said:
D. C. Bear said:
Mothra said:
D. C. Bear said:
Mothra said:
Osodecentx said:
Mothra said:
Osodecentx said:
Mothra said:
https://www.rt.com/news/542078-twitter-heart-association-unsafe-vaccines/
Good to know an organ of Russian propaganda (RT.com) is concerned about American vaccines
RT (formerly Russia Today) is a Russian state-controlled[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rt.com#cite_note-state_media-1][1][/url] international television network funded by the federal tax budget of the Russian government.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RT_(TV_network)
It's interesting (and perhaps, telling) that your initial inclination was to attack the messenger.
There are plenty of articles regarding twitter censoring the information in question. A simple google search would have revealed that (see below), if you were concerned the article was posting false info. I am not sure if you read the article, but that's the reason it was posted. The RT article doesn't express concern over American vaccines, but merely talks about the AHA abstract and the twitter censorship.
It's interesting that you chose RT.com and not "plenty of articles" to support your case. You have access to Google, but chose Rt.com. That Putin is a rascal
I am trying to understand your argument, if you in fact have one. Do you dispute that twitter put a warning label on the abstract from the American Heart Association?
If you want to engage in an irrelevant ad hominem on RT, you are welcome to it. I don't really care, as long as you don't dispute the substance. It's always easier to attack the messenger, as it takes the focus off the lack of substance in your posts.
Back to the top. YES, Twitter did post a warning "on an abstract from the American Heart Association," BUT the American Heart Association also placed a warning on that same abstract.
Never disputed that. Glad you agree that the link from RT is accurate. Some here believe it's Russian propaganda.
It is more fair and balanced than your deceptive post was, there is no doubt about that.
Not going to debate your lies again. Go find a brick wall.
Anyone reading your post and those that follow knows where the deception in this thread is coming from: you.
You started a thread to tell us how bad Twitter was for putting a warning on the truth that the American Heart Association, a generally credible source, was sharing. Your post was deceptive because Twitter wasn't doing anything that the American Heart Association wasn't doing with the same abstract. What you have done in this instance is both deceptive and despicable, and you should be ashamed of yourself for it.
I know how much your enormous ego hates being told you are wrong, but you're wrong again.
The purpose of my post was to discuss the abstract. I posed a question on the OP and then posted the abstract. At the end I posted a link to an article discussing the Twitter warning.
If you research the abstract, Twitter first posted the warning after a number of people complained about it. AHA quickly followed suit (after all we can't have anyone who questions the safety of the vaccine) and has been backtracking ever since.
Of course all of this info was included in the links in the OP. But you think I created a deceptive impression. You vax Nazis are a hoot.