Oldbear83 said:I asked why no one was charged for that and you tried to change the point.quash said:quash said:Oldbear83 said:Which in English means no one was ever charged with that crime, because that claim is just one of many lies about that day.quash said:Oldbear83 said:Name the people who made that threat, please.quash said:ATL Bear said:No, it's what happens when you stop looking for narratives and deal in the realities.quash said:ATL Bear said:Harassing the tellers and the manager doesn't make you a bank robber.Osodecentx said:I don't think they could. They believed they could.ATL Bear said:How could they have installed the losing candidate?Osodecentx said:It's a fiction.Mothra said:Are you scared to answer my question? Too difficult for you?Osodecentx said:Cool answer, BroMothra said:I notice you didn't answer my question. Let me repeat it in case you missed it.Osodecentx said:You're allegiance to your narrative determines your responseMothra said:
I think anyone who broke the law and committed violence on Jan. 6th needs to be held accountable. I've said that from day one. So, how is that "excusing" them?
Like you, I do wish Trump would go away. The difference between us is I don't let my personal dislike of the man make me nuts. I still have the ability to think rationally.
Video of mostly peaceful Jan 6 insurrection
HBO trailer 2 hours of mostly peaceful mob
How is not believing this was a violent insurrection excusing the protestors who committed violence?
The only one married to a narrative here is you, bro.
Huh. Never figured you for a coward.
This was an insurrection trying to install the losing candidate as POTUS
You're spiinning Trump's narrative
Did I answer your question?
A stupid bank robber still tried to rob the bank
This is what happens to a narrative when intent is excluded.
The reality is that those people stormed the capital to interfere with a valid election. Some of them with the expressed intent to use violence against the Vice President. You leave that reality out of your narrative. Why?
"Do your own homework."
Arrests are still being made but if you had done your homework you'd have turned up Rachel Myers among others.
You asked about threats, I gave you a name.
As expected.
I explained the point: assault by threat cannot be done remotely, you must have the present ability to carry out the threat.
That's when you pivoted. Not me