Why can't young people afford houses?

98,359 Views | 1302 Replies | Last: 6 hrs ago by FLBear5630
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

The boomer hate is ridiculous.

Like if a boomer didn't buy a $2,000,000 home in Lakeland, FL some millennial would have.

The reason boomers are buying stuff is that they are from a generation that saved like crazy which means they have had 50 years of compound interest on their side.

Boomers are not buying up $200,000 properties because they already owned those homes in the 70s.

No hate...but lets not forget some facts.


1. Not all Boomers are buying $2million dollar homes in retirement areas

A relatively small market that most younger buyers would not even be looking at.

But many are still buying homes in mid size fly over cities....say like Waco...and many are buying for investment purposes.

Hedge funds and Private equity as also gotten into the game.

2. That generation was in a very advantageous position to ride a historic market high into retirement and take advantage of peek earing years.

3. They had not yet had to compete for entry level jobs with millions of foreign born competition. A significant issue I think that often gets overlooked.

Foreign born percentage of the U.S. population was 6% in 1980....its was 15.8% by 2025...and that does not even count illegals who are not being measured. We are talking 44 million people who have been brought in to compete and drive down wages.

4. The costs have risen for home ownership as a percentage of income (much like higher education and health care). In 1980 the average home cost 4 times the average income....by 2020 is was 8 times the average income. Average rent was 23% of income in 1980....today is 42% on average and in some markets that is far higher.

So costs have risen across the board, large amounts of people have be brought in (legal or other wise) to drive down wages and increase competition for housing, and even rent has increased, while in many markets NIMBY (not in my back yard) housing policy has prevent or hampered new construction.







FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

nein51 said:

The boomer hate is ridiculous.

Like if a boomer didn't buy a $2,000,000 home in Lakeland, FL some millennial would have.

The reason boomers are buying stuff is that they are from a generation that saved like crazy which means they have had 50 years of compound interest on their side.

Boomers are not buying up $200,000 properties because they already owned those homes in the 70s.

No hate...but lets not forget some facts.


1. Not all Boomers are buying $2million dollar homes in retirement areas

A relatively small market that most younger buyers would not even be looking at.

But many are still buying homes in mid size fly over cities....say like Waco...and many are buying for investment purposes.

Hedge funds and Private equity as also gotten into the game.

2. That generation was in a very advantageous position to ride a historic market high into retirement and take advantage of peek earing years.

3. They had not yet had to compete for entry level jobs with millions of foreign born competition. A significant issue I think that often gets overlooked.

Foreign born percentage of the U.S. population was 6% in 1980....its was 15.8% by 2025...and that does not even count illegals who are not being measured. We are talking 44 million people who have been brought in to compete and drive down wages.

4. The costs have risen for home ownership as a percentage of income (much like higher education and health care). In 1980 the average home cost 4 times the average income....by 2020 is was 8 times the average income. Average rent was 23% of income in 1980....today is 42% on average and in some markets that is far higher.

So costs have risen across the board, large amounts of people have be brought in (legal or other wise) to drive down wages and increase competition for housing, and even rent has increased, while in many markets NIMBY (not in my back yard) housing policy has prevent or hampered new construction.









I do agree with you on the Hedge Funds and the Private Equity funds that are turning neighborhoods into rental areas. They are a problem and many HOA's have had to pass rules that only long term rentals are allowed.


The part of the 250k to 1M is that they bought it in 1986. They stayed and kept the property for 40 years, 2 generations. The paid alot of property taxes, HOA fees, Neighborhood special assessments that paid for those sidewalks, streetlights, wall/gate, and schools that make it the desirable location it is today. You make it sound like they did nothing and were just lucky. (Not to mention, the houses sold in 1986 were bought in 1969 for 20k, that is what real estate does, it is called an investment.)

Also, you mention a 16 year Bull market they rode. Who do you think worked, produced and consumed at a level that allowed that to happen? You think it just happens by luck? It was the Boomers hard work and investments that created a 16 year Bull. Ask Boomers how many "mental health" days they took when they worked? Or a whole host of concessions that your generations think should be included.

You guys say it was all Government spending and the Government got too big. Do you realize that as a percentage of population served the Federal Government is the same size it was then and doing much more with less revenue. But, it is easier to just blame everyone else.



Is government too big? Reflections on the size and composition of today's federal government | Brookings
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

Redbrickbear said:

nein51 said:

The boomer hate is ridiculous.

Like if a boomer didn't buy a $2,000,000 home in Lakeland, FL some millennial would have.

The reason boomers are buying stuff is that they are from a generation that saved like crazy which means they have had 50 years of compound interest on their side.

Boomers are not buying up $200,000 properties because they already owned those homes in the 70s.


4. The costs have risen for home ownership as a percentage of income (much like higher education and health care). In 1980 the average home cost 4 times the average income....by 2020 is was 8 times the average income. Average rent was 23% of income in 1980....today is 42% on average and in some markets that is far higher.





I do agree with you on the Hedge Funds and the Private Equity funds that are turning neighborhoods into rental areas. They are a problem and many HOA's have had to pass rules that only long term rentals are allowed.


The part of the 250k to 1M is that they bought it in 1986. They stayed and kept the property for 40 years, 2 generations. The paid alot of property taxes, HOA fees, Neighborhood special assessments that paid for those sidewalks, streetlights, wall/gate, and schools that make it the desirable location it is today. You make it sound like they did nothing and were just lucky. (Not to mention, the houses sold in 1986 were bought in 1969 for 20k, that is what real estate does, it is called an investment.)

Also, you mention a 16 year Bull market they rode. Who do you think worked, produced and consumed at a level that allowed that to happen? You think it just happens by luck? It was the Boomers hard work and investments that created a 16 year Bull. Ask Boomers how many "mental health" days they took when they worked? Or a whole host of concessions that your generations think should be included.

You guys say it was all Government spending and the Government got too big. Do you realize that as a percentage of population served the Federal Government is the same size it was then and doing much more with less revenue. But, it is easier to just blame everyone else.



Is government too big? Reflections on the size and composition of today's federal government | Brookings




No blame on my part.

The Boomers took advantage of the system and opportunities that presented themselves at that time....they are not "villains". They had to work, pay taxes, have their own struggles, etc.

Just the fact that younger Americans are facing a more uphill battle when it comes to home ownership.

Prices rising faster than wages, immigration (legal and otherwise) creating more competition for jobs, jobs moving rapidly to the large metro areas were costs are even higher and rising, regulation about building new housing, etc.

I did not know that many people from Baylor who were hell bent on 100% desiring to go to Austin, DFW, or Houston to live their lives after college....heck not a small number loved and wanted to stay in Waco...they moved to those places because that was where the jobs were located.

And without home ownership young people are not going to start families or have many kids....nor are they going to he as good civic citizens if they have no stake in the game.

J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We have been very spoiled in Texas relative to home ownership and the cost of living. The markets drive prices. Last I checked,, people aren't guaranteed the picket fence in suburban hell. Lot and lots of folks in NYC, Boston, Chicago live in apartments. Some for generations. Housing is like anything else. It is a trade off. What. are you willing to trade?
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There's some luck of timing involved but modern history says 3 generations after millennials will be *****ing that millennials got lucky they were there for the beginning of crypto and they can't believe you could get a nice house for only $300,000
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

We have been very spoiled in Texas relative to home ownership and the cost of living. The markets drive prices. Last I checked,, people aren't guaranteed the picket fence in suburban hell. Lot and lots of folks in NYC, Boston, Chicago live in apartments. Some for generations. Housing is like anything else. It is a trade off. What. are you willing to trade?

If you want to live in the neighborhood I just moved out of I could have sold you my house which was 1900 sq ft, had a nice yard and new (you name it large and I had it done, roof, hvac, driveway etc) for less than 200k.

There were plenty of houses in that neighborhood that could be bought for 165k or less.

But it was ghetto adjacent. Super nice neighborhood where we lived but you didn't want to go 1.5 miles in any direction. I ended up wholesaling that house for $130k.

People want new, granite counters, custom kitchen and bathrooms and 2,500 sq ft in the nicest part of town and they want it for $250k.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

J.R. said:

We have been very spoiled in Texas relative to home ownership and the cost of living. The markets drive prices. Last I checked,, people aren't guaranteed the picket fence in suburban hell. Lot and lots of folks in NYC, Boston, Chicago live in apartments. Some for generations. Housing is like anything else. It is a trade off. What. are you willing to trade?

If you want to live in the neighborhood I just moved out of I could have sold you my house which was 1900 sq ft, had a nice yard and new (you name it large and I had it done, roof, hvac, driveway etc) for less than 200k.

There were plenty of houses in that neighborhood that could be bought for 165k or less.

But it was ghetto adjacent. Super nice neighborhood where we lived but you didn't want to go 1.5 miles in any direction. I ended up wholesaling that house for $130k.

People want new, granite counters, custom kitchen and bathrooms and 2,500 sq ft in the nicest part of town and they want it for $250k.

yup.

People also forget 2008-2012. Lot's of short sales, I was one of them. It is a double edge sword. A lot of people got hurt in 2008 to 2012. Housing bubble burst and job market went in tank, layoffs all over. Boomers and Gen X took it on the chin.
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

nein51 said:

J.R. said:

We have been very spoiled in Texas relative to home ownership and the cost of living. The markets drive prices. Last I checked,, people aren't guaranteed the picket fence in suburban hell. Lot and lots of folks in NYC, Boston, Chicago live in apartments. Some for generations. Housing is like anything else. It is a trade off. What. are you willing to trade?

If you want to live in the neighborhood I just moved out of I could have sold you my house which was 1900 sq ft, had a nice yard and new (you name it large and I had it done, roof, hvac, driveway etc) for less than 200k.

There were plenty of houses in that neighborhood that could be bought for 165k or less.

But it was ghetto adjacent. Super nice neighborhood where we lived but you didn't want to go 1.5 miles in any direction. I ended up wholesaling that house for $130k.

People want new, granite counters, custom kitchen and bathrooms and 2,500 sq ft in the nicest part of town and they want it for $250k.

yup.

People also forget 2008-2012. Lot's of short sales, I was one of them. It is a double edge sword. A lot of people got hurt in 2008 to 2012. Housing bubble burst and job market went in tank, layoffs all over. Boomers and Gen X took it on the chin.

I worked with many close to retirement guys who ended up having to work another 2-3 years to recover before they could retire. I could make a strong argument that the position that company is in these days (which isn't good) is a direct result of that.

The old guys stayed on, the younger guys left because they didn't want to wait 2-3 more years to be promoted so they lost all of that talent and then 2-3 years later they also lost the long time leadership. It really hurt the company. They may have been better off to offer buyouts to those guys.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

FLBear5630 said:

nein51 said:

J.R. said:

We have been very spoiled in Texas relative to home ownership and the cost of living. The markets drive prices. Last I checked,, people aren't guaranteed the picket fence in suburban hell. Lot and lots of folks in NYC, Boston, Chicago live in apartments. Some for generations. Housing is like anything else. It is a trade off. What. are you willing to trade?

If you want to live in the neighborhood I just moved out of I could have sold you my house which was 1900 sq ft, had a nice yard and new (you name it large and I had it done, roof, hvac, driveway etc) for less than 200k.

There were plenty of houses in that neighborhood that could be bought for 165k or less.

But it was ghetto adjacent. Super nice neighborhood where we lived but you didn't want to go 1.5 miles in any direction. I ended up wholesaling that house for $130k.

People want new, granite counters, custom kitchen and bathrooms and 2,500 sq ft in the nicest part of town and they want it for $250k.

yup.

People also forget 2008-2012. Lot's of short sales, I was one of them. It is a double edge sword. A lot of people got hurt in 2008 to 2012. Housing bubble burst and job market went in tank, layoffs all over. Boomers and Gen X took it on the chin.

I worked with many close to retirement guys who ended up having to work another 2-3 years to recover before they could retire. I could make a strong argument that the position that company is in these days (which isn't good) is a direct result of that.

The old guys stayed on, the younger guys left because they didn't want to wait 2-3 more years to be promoted so they lost all of that talent and then 2-3 years later they also lost the long time leadership. It really hurt the company. They may have been better off to offer buyouts to those guys.

Depends on the old guy and depends on the industry. If you are staying into older age, let's say beyond 65 you better be ok with learning new ways to do things and your role changing. If you are staying and not bringing value, yeah it can be bad. Buy out better. Depends a lot on if you really like your job or if it is just a job.

I don't plan on retiring. May move to part-time, on line or consulting, but seen too many retire and it was not good for them.

J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

J.R. said:

We have been very spoiled in Texas relative to home ownership and the cost of living. The markets drive prices. Last I checked,, people aren't guaranteed the picket fence in suburban hell. Lot and lots of folks in NYC, Boston, Chicago live in apartments. Some for generations. Housing is like anything else. It is a trade off. What. are you willing to trade?

If you want to live in the neighborhood I just moved out of I could have sold you my house which was 1900 sq ft, had a nice yard and new (you name it large and I had it done, roof, hvac, driveway etc) for less than 200k.

There were plenty of houses in that neighborhood that could be bought for 165k or less.

But it was ghetto adjacent. Super nice neighborhood where we lived but you didn't want to go 1.5 miles in any direction. I ended up wholesaling that house for $130k.

People want new, granite counters, custom kitchen and bathrooms and 2,500 sq ft in the nicest part of town and they want it for $250k.

nah, I'm good. I'm a city dweller and live in an apartment and rent by choice.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

nein51 said:

FLBear5630 said:

nein51 said:

J.R. said:

We have been very spoiled in Texas relative to home ownership and the cost of living. The markets drive prices. Last I checked,, people aren't guaranteed the picket fence in suburban hell. Lot and lots of folks in NYC, Boston, Chicago live in apartments. Some for generations. Housing is like anything else. It is a trade off. What. are you willing to trade?

If you want to live in the neighborhood I just moved out of I could have sold you my house which was 1900 sq ft, had a nice yard and new (you name it large and I had it done, roof, hvac, driveway etc) for less than 200k.

There were plenty of houses in that neighborhood that could be bought for 165k or less.

But it was ghetto adjacent. Super nice neighborhood where we lived but you didn't want to go 1.5 miles in any direction. I ended up wholesaling that house for $130k.

People want new, granite counters, custom kitchen and bathrooms and 2,500 sq ft in the nicest part of town and they want it for $250k.

yup.

People also forget 2008-2012. Lot's of short sales, I was one of them. It is a double edge sword. A lot of people got hurt in 2008 to 2012. Housing bubble burst and job market went in tank, layoffs all over. Boomers and Gen X took it on the chin.

I worked with many close to retirement guys who ended up having to work another 2-3 years to recover before they could retire. I could make a strong argument that the position that company is in these days (which isn't good) is a direct result of that.

The old guys stayed on, the younger guys left because they didn't want to wait 2-3 more years to be promoted so they lost all of that talent and then 2-3 years later they also lost the long time leadership. It really hurt the company. They may have been better off to offer buyouts to those guys.

Depends on the old guy and depends on the industry. If you are staying into older age, let's say beyond 65 you better be ok with learning new ways to do things and your role changing. If you are staying and not bringing value, yeah it can be bad. Buy out better. Depends a lot on if you really like your job or if it is just a job.

I don't plan on retiring. May move to part-time, on line or consulting, but seen too many retire and it was not good for them.



I'm with you on retirement. I am a firm believer that you start dying when you retire. I will never retire.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

FLBear5630 said:

nein51 said:

FLBear5630 said:

nein51 said:

J.R. said:

We have been very spoiled in Texas relative to home ownership and the cost of living. The markets drive prices. Last I checked,, people aren't guaranteed the picket fence in suburban hell. Lot and lots of folks in NYC, Boston, Chicago live in apartments. Some for generations. Housing is like anything else. It is a trade off. What. are you willing to trade?

If you want to live in the neighborhood I just moved out of I could have sold you my house which was 1900 sq ft, had a nice yard and new (you name it large and I had it done, roof, hvac, driveway etc) for less than 200k.

There were plenty of houses in that neighborhood that could be bought for 165k or less.

But it was ghetto adjacent. Super nice neighborhood where we lived but you didn't want to go 1.5 miles in any direction. I ended up wholesaling that house for $130k.

People want new, granite counters, custom kitchen and bathrooms and 2,500 sq ft in the nicest part of town and they want it for $250k.

yup.

People also forget 2008-2012. Lot's of short sales, I was one of them. It is a double edge sword. A lot of people got hurt in 2008 to 2012. Housing bubble burst and job market went in tank, layoffs all over. Boomers and Gen X took it on the chin.

I worked with many close to retirement guys who ended up having to work another 2-3 years to recover before they could retire. I could make a strong argument that the position that company is in these days (which isn't good) is a direct result of that.

The old guys stayed on, the younger guys left because they didn't want to wait 2-3 more years to be promoted so they lost all of that talent and then 2-3 years later they also lost the long time leadership. It really hurt the company. They may have been better off to offer buyouts to those guys.

Depends on the old guy and depends on the industry. If you are staying into older age, let's say beyond 65 you better be ok with learning new ways to do things and your role changing. If you are staying and not bringing value, yeah it can be bad. Buy out better. Depends a lot on if you really like your job or if it is just a job.

I don't plan on retiring. May move to part-time, on line or consulting, but seen too many retire and it was not good for them.



I'm with you on retirement. I am a firm believer that you start dying when you retire. I will never retire.

My Dad told me that when you retire think about what the next milestone is, not many are good...
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

We have been very spoiled in Texas relative to home ownership and the cost of living.


First thing you have said in a while that I agree with....of course that is rapidly coming to an end as well.


The median home price in Texas is now $375,500

And of course that is with rural homes (limited jobs around) and ghetto areas (unsafe for kids and horrible schools) making the number look reasonable.

[A recent Texas A&M Real Estate Center study indicates that Texas housing prices have been rising faster than the state's personal income.]


muddybrazos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

J.R. said:

FLBear5630 said:

nein51 said:

FLBear5630 said:

nein51 said:

J.R. said:

We have been very spoiled in Texas relative to home ownership and the cost of living. The markets drive prices. Last I checked,, people aren't guaranteed the picket fence in suburban hell. Lot and lots of folks in NYC, Boston, Chicago live in apartments. Some for generations. Housing is like anything else. It is a trade off. What. are you willing to trade?

If you want to live in the neighborhood I just moved out of I could have sold you my house which was 1900 sq ft, had a nice yard and new (you name it large and I had it done, roof, hvac, driveway etc) for less than 200k.

There were plenty of houses in that neighborhood that could be bought for 165k or less.

But it was ghetto adjacent. Super nice neighborhood where we lived but you didn't want to go 1.5 miles in any direction. I ended up wholesaling that house for $130k.

People want new, granite counters, custom kitchen and bathrooms and 2,500 sq ft in the nicest part of town and they want it for $250k.

yup.

People also forget 2008-2012. Lot's of short sales, I was one of them. It is a double edge sword. A lot of people got hurt in 2008 to 2012. Housing bubble burst and job market went in tank, layoffs all over. Boomers and Gen X took it on the chin.

I worked with many close to retirement guys who ended up having to work another 2-3 years to recover before they could retire. I could make a strong argument that the position that company is in these days (which isn't good) is a direct result of that.

The old guys stayed on, the younger guys left because they didn't want to wait 2-3 more years to be promoted so they lost all of that talent and then 2-3 years later they also lost the long time leadership. It really hurt the company. They may have been better off to offer buyouts to those guys.

Depends on the old guy and depends on the industry. If you are staying into older age, let's say beyond 65 you better be ok with learning new ways to do things and your role changing. If you are staying and not bringing value, yeah it can be bad. Buy out better. Depends a lot on if you really like your job or if it is just a job.

I don't plan on retiring. May move to part-time, on line or consulting, but seen too many retire and it was not good for them.



I'm with you on retirement. I am a firm believer that you start dying when you retire. I will never retire.

My Dad told me that when you retire think about what the next milestone is, not many are good...

My idea of retiring would be just doing investment deals and trading the markets. Also, have different workout clases every day. I do look forward to the day that I dont have to go into the office everyday.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
muddybrazos said:

FLBear5630 said:

J.R. said:

FLBear5630 said:

nein51 said:

FLBear5630 said:

nein51 said:

J.R. said:

We have been very spoiled in Texas relative to home ownership and the cost of living. The markets drive prices. Last I checked,, people aren't guaranteed the picket fence in suburban hell. Lot and lots of folks in NYC, Boston, Chicago live in apartments. Some for generations. Housing is like anything else. It is a trade off. What. are you willing to trade?

If you want to live in the neighborhood I just moved out of I could have sold you my house which was 1900 sq ft, had a nice yard and new (you name it large and I had it done, roof, hvac, driveway etc) for less than 200k.

There were plenty of houses in that neighborhood that could be bought for 165k or less.

But it was ghetto adjacent. Super nice neighborhood where we lived but you didn't want to go 1.5 miles in any direction. I ended up wholesaling that house for $130k.

People want new, granite counters, custom kitchen and bathrooms and 2,500 sq ft in the nicest part of town and they want it for $250k.

yup.

People also forget 2008-2012. Lot's of short sales, I was one of them. It is a double edge sword. A lot of people got hurt in 2008 to 2012. Housing bubble burst and job market went in tank, layoffs all over. Boomers and Gen X took it on the chin.

I worked with many close to retirement guys who ended up having to work another 2-3 years to recover before they could retire. I could make a strong argument that the position that company is in these days (which isn't good) is a direct result of that.

The old guys stayed on, the younger guys left because they didn't want to wait 2-3 more years to be promoted so they lost all of that talent and then 2-3 years later they also lost the long time leadership. It really hurt the company. They may have been better off to offer buyouts to those guys.

Depends on the old guy and depends on the industry. If you are staying into older age, let's say beyond 65 you better be ok with learning new ways to do things and your role changing. If you are staying and not bringing value, yeah it can be bad. Buy out better. Depends a lot on if you really like your job or if it is just a job.

I don't plan on retiring. May move to part-time, on line or consulting, but seen too many retire and it was not good for them.



I'm with you on retirement. I am a firm believer that you start dying when you retire. I will never retire.

My Dad told me that when you retire think about what the next milestone is, not many are good...

My idea of retiring would be just doing investment deals and trading the markets. Also, have different workout clases every day. I do look forward to the day that I dont have to go into the office everyday.


That seems very doable. I plan on doing similar, maybe working one or two projects a year.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
muddybrazos said:

RealEstateBear said:

Mass illegal and legal immigration is why people can't afford homes. Mass deportations will take care of the problem and believe me it must and will happen.

Looking forward to the real estate crash when millions of homes come up for sale once we remove people who do not belong here

Thats some wishful thinking right there. Trump has closed the border so we arent getting many new illegals but he's way behind Obama in deporting. There's just no way we get to even 1 million deported in his first year and somwhere between 10 and 20 million came in under Biden. Then you have Trumps donors who want tons of Indian H1B people coming in bc companies prefer the cheap labor rather than hiring Americans who cost more.

Obama was deporting them when apprehended at the border.
Trump is having to go find them.

Sister-in-law is issuing deportation orders as fast as she can hammer down the gavel.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

whiterock said:

nein51 said:

Some of you are really convinced that undocumented migrants, making $8/hr are buying homes.

Which sort of flies in the face of "houses are too expensive so gen whatever can't afford them".

In 2023 there were around 5,000 underwritten ITIN loans (that's is loans to people with no SSN).

The upward pressure argument makes sense if you mean rent for apartments and crap hole homes in terrible parts of down should go down…because that's where people that make $8/hr live.

don't let yourself be convinced that all illegals are making $8/hr. Once they gain some skill in the trades, the rate gets more competitive than that. Think $12-15/hr.

the upward pressure from illegal immigration is a known dynamic in real estate markets. Sure, 20m illegals do not create immediate demand for 20m homes. But it does have effect. we do not have 20m new housing starts a year. And yes, the impact is felt first in rental and low-income housing, by first-time homebuyers, the working class, etc....downward pressure on wages, upward pressure on housing prices. The wealthy typically profit from the dynamic. which fits Rob Henderson's "luxury beliefs" model = they tend to not mind illegal immigration at all because they benefit from it (lower labor costs, more equity in real estate) without having to bear the costs of it.

I

Tell you what let's say the average illegal makes $20/hr (they don't) this is about a 50 page thread about how millennials can't afford to buy homes because they don't make enough relative to the cost of housing.

You're going to have to work hard to convince me someone making $40,000 a year is buying up all the homes. I could be convinced but it's going to take a whole lot of logical argument.

You're making the same error that cowboy is. The problem is not that illegal aliens are buying the average $300k starter home in central Tx. The problem is that they are occupying dwellings.

There are only so many bedrooms in the country at any given time. When you create demand for those bedrooms that consistently exceeds supply, prices for those bedrooms will rise, even for rentals. When prices of rented bedrooms rise, it incentivizes renters to buy. Buying existing is cheaper per sq ft than buying new (so easier to qualify for). Every time someone buys an existing home, there is a seller who also needs a place to live, and typically had some equity from the sale to put down on a larger home. And of course when they do buy that larger home, there is now another seller who also needs a place to live (and on and on and on).

That dynamic may vary in intensity & complexion from place to place, but its all a response to basic macroeconomics. When illegal immigration causes population growth to accelerate faster than new home starts........REAL ESTATE PRICES WILL RISE.

(and, of course, the fed will try to choke off that cycle with higher interest rates........)



whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

FLBear5630 said:

cowboycwr said:

nein51 said:

whiterock said:

nein51 said:

Some of you are really convinced that undocumented migrants, making $8/hr are buying homes.

Which sort of flies in the face of "houses are too expensive so gen whatever can't afford them".

In 2023 there were around 5,000 underwritten ITIN loans (that's is loans to people with no SSN).

The upward pressure argument makes sense if you mean rent for apartments and crap hole homes in terrible parts of down should go down…because that's where people that make $8/hr live.

don't let yourself be convinced that all illegals are making $8/hr. Once they gain some skill in the trades, the rate gets more competitive than that. Think $12-15/hr.

the upward pressure from illegal immigration is a known dynamic in real estate markets. Sure, 20m illegals do not create immediate demand for 20m homes. But it does have effect. we do not have 20m new housing starts a year. And yes, the impact is felt first in rental and low-income housing, by first-time homebuyers, the working class, etc....downward pressure on wages, upward pressure on housing prices. The wealthy typically profit from the dynamic. which fits Rob Henderson's "luxury beliefs" model = they tend to not mind illegal immigration at all because they benefit from it (lower labor costs, more equity in real estate) without having to bear the costs of it.

I

Tell you what let's say the average illegal makes $20/hr (they don't) this is about a 50 page thread about how millennials can't afford to buy homes because they don't make enough relative to the cost of housing.

You're going to have to work hard to convince me someone making $40,000 a year is buying up all the homes. I could be convinced but it's going to take a whole lot of logical argument.


The only way I could see this is when you get multiple people or families in the same house and have maybe 4-6 people all making $40,000 per year to pay for the house. I have seen this many times before where one house has 3 families living in it. Or more.

Do we move to generational homes, like you see in other parts of the world? This is a concept we are seeing in land development, especially in urban areas where land is at a premium.

This concept actually solves several problems we are seeing in the US today,
1 - cost is shared
2 - daycare - older generations play that role
3 - social support as we age
4 - medical support

It is not a common concept in the US, but it does have upsides. Or will it be considered leftist, socialism?

Evolving Housing Trends: The Rise of Multi-Generational Living

Planning for a multi-generational future : policies, regulations, and designs for multi-generational housing in the United States

Making Multigenerational Communities Happen - Urban Land Magazine



People are free to make that choice if they want.

As to forcing people to adopt this style….. heck no.

said a different way: market forces seem to be pressuring consideration of that option.

No question there is a soft trend of multi-generational living going on. Some cities are softening ordinances originally intended to inhibit such. My great-grandmother in Irving Tx funded her retirement by renting out bedrooms to TDY'ers from Lone Star Gas (where my grandfather put in a 40yr career and retired as chief of the pipeline division.) Is that kind of stuff coming back? Maybe. We already have VRBO and the like. So the platforms are in place to make it viable for borders and landlords to find each other.

I have heard developers and city planners discussing the topic. Not in the context of anyone seeking to push the issue by law or regulation, but rather to note the market pressures at play and wonder IF they might create a new trend. Could we reach a point where companies might start to purchase/build homes to rent to their employees (at competitive or slightly below market rates) as a labor force retention step? Not happening now, but such a scenario is borderline viable right now. How much more will it take to start a trend? (who knows...)

It's quite a bit easier to see macro-forces at play than it is to know if/when the forces will break inertia and start movement in a new direction.



J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
put in simple terms I even understand. Work your ass off, save your $, don't waste $...buy a house.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

nein51 said:

The boomer hate is ridiculous.

Like if a boomer didn't buy a $2,000,000 home in Lakeland, FL some millennial would have.

The reason boomers are buying stuff is that they are from a generation that saved like crazy which means they have had 50 years of compound interest on their side.

Boomers are not buying up $200,000 properties because they already owned those homes in the 70s.

No hate...but lets not forget some facts.


1. Not all Boomers are buying $2million dollar homes in retirement areas

A relatively small market that most younger buyers would not even be looking at.

But many are still buying homes in mid size fly over cities....say like Waco...and many are buying for investment purposes.

Hedge funds and Private equity as also gotten into the game.

2. That generation was in a very advantageous position to ride a historic market high into retirement and take advantage of peek earing years.

3. They had not yet had to compete for entry level jobs with millions of foreign born competition. A significant issue I think that often gets overlooked.

Foreign born percentage of the U.S. population was 6% in 1980....its was 15.8% by 2025...and that does not even count illegals who are not being measured. We are talking 44 million people who have been brought in to compete and drive down wages.

4. The costs have risen for home ownership as a percentage of income (much like higher education and health care). In 1980 the average home cost 4 times the average income....by 2020 is was 8 times the average income. Average rent was 23% of income in 1980....today is 42% on average and in some markets that is far higher.

So costs have risen across the board, large amounts of people have be brought in (legal or other wise) to drive down wages and increase competition for housing, and even rent has increased, while in many markets NIMBY (not in my back yard) housing policy has prevent or hampered new construction.









The increase in rents? Hello illegal aliens.

When you talk about "average cost" rather than "average price per square foot" you have to allow for the reality that the size of the average home as at least doubled. "average cost" also includes all homes, most of which will not really be in the "first time buyer" market.

Not saying that totally undermines your point. Just putting out some caveats about the data cited. We clearly do have a problem.

It's also important to realize that no one thing will solve the problem. It will take a number of steps. And in that regard, reducing the illegal alien population reduces the most glaring known macro-economic factor - when demand for bedrooms exceeds the supply of bedrooms, the price of bedrooms will rise.


nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

nein51 said:

whiterock said:

nein51 said:

Some of you are really convinced that undocumented migrants, making $8/hr are buying homes.

Which sort of flies in the face of "houses are too expensive so gen whatever can't afford them".

In 2023 there were around 5,000 underwritten ITIN loans (that's is loans to people with no SSN).

The upward pressure argument makes sense if you mean rent for apartments and crap hole homes in terrible parts of down should go down…because that's where people that make $8/hr live.

don't let yourself be convinced that all illegals are making $8/hr. Once they gain some skill in the trades, the rate gets more competitive than that. Think $12-15/hr.

the upward pressure from illegal immigration is a known dynamic in real estate markets. Sure, 20m illegals do not create immediate demand for 20m homes. But it does have effect. we do not have 20m new housing starts a year. And yes, the impact is felt first in rental and low-income housing, by first-time homebuyers, the working class, etc....downward pressure on wages, upward pressure on housing prices. The wealthy typically profit from the dynamic. which fits Rob Henderson's "luxury beliefs" model = they tend to not mind illegal immigration at all because they benefit from it (lower labor costs, more equity in real estate) without having to bear the costs of it.

I

Tell you what let's say the average illegal makes $20/hr (they don't) this is about a 50 page thread about how millennials can't afford to buy homes because they don't make enough relative to the cost of housing.

You're going to have to work hard to convince me someone making $40,000 a year is buying up all the homes. I could be convinced but it's going to take a whole lot of logical argument.

You're making the same error that cowboy is. The problem is not that illegal aliens are buying the average $300k starter home in central Tx. The problem is that they are occupying dwellings.

There are only so many bedrooms in the country at any given time. When you create demand for those bedrooms that consistently exceeds supply, prices for those bedrooms will rise, even for rentals. When prices of rented bedrooms rise, it incentivizes renters to buy. Buying existing is cheaper per sq ft than buying new (so easier to qualify for). Every time someone buys an existing home, there is a seller who also needs a place to live, and typically had some equity from the sale to put down on a larger home. And of course when they do buy that larger home, there is now another seller who also needs a place to live (and on and on and on).

That dynamic may vary in intensity & complexion from place to place, but its all a response to basic macroeconomics. When illegal immigration causes population growth to accelerate faster than new home starts........REAL ESTATE PRICES WILL RISE.

(and, of course, the fed will try to choke off that cycle with higher interest rates........)


No I get what you're saying illegals take the space that poor people take, then poor people take the space the lower middle class take, then the lower middle class takes the space the middle class takes and so on

I'm saying I don't buy that argument as the demand for space at the poor people level doesn't shift upward because they can't afford for it to shift upward.

It is possible that illegals drive the price of low end housing up and it's absolutely true they are a strain on services but they are not the reason millennials can't buy homes imo.

That is not to say I'm pro illegal immigration because I'm definitely definitively not.
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

put in simple terms I even understand. Work your ass off, save your $, don't waste $...buy a house.

The overwhelming majority of our customers are working class people. It is SHOCKING how many of those guys live paycheck to paycheck but also just bought a new jet ski, quad, Razr, boat, gun, etc.

They are allergic to saving money or preparing for any bad thing to happen to them.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

J.R. said:

put in simple terms I even understand. Work your ass off, save your $, don't waste $...buy a house.

The overwhelming majority of our customers are working class people. It is SHOCKING how many of those guys live paycheck to paycheck but also just bought a new jet ski, quad, Razr, boat, gun, etc.

They are allergic to saving money or preparing for any bad thing to happen to them.

I can see both sides, especially with kids involved.

Financially everything you say is true. Time-wise, I am not so sure.

There is only a finite amount of time with family. Kids will only be 12 once. Once they get older they will lose that kid happiness of baseball with Dad. Can I afford, according to the financial rules, to do travel baseball and help him make the High School team? Is there a dollar value on those nights after games?

Even when they are older, it doesn't change. Now the clock ticks faster. Relatives die, wife wants to see where her family came from and show her kids. Financially, it is a horrible decision. Dollar value on going to Westphalen Germany and seeing where she and her kids heritage comes together?

I am not the best person to talk to about this subject. I watched people follow EVERY financial rule. Live frugally to the point of putting a timer on the hot water heater. To be able to travel to see grandkids in retirement. Only to die at 63 of Breast Cancer. Never take one trip. Spend their life sitting in a house saving for when they would be able to afford it, all the while the financial manager telling her to keep saving... Others sitting in ACLF's not able to do anything, but pay the ACLF. But they have money.

So, I am on the fence on this one. Not what the Baylor crowd will support based on my experience. But for those people, that jet ski with kids and grandkids may do more than any amount of money will do for an emergency fund. There are different sides to every equation.

Just another view.

J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

nein51 said:

J.R. said:

put in simple terms I even understand. Work your ass off, save your $, don't waste $...buy a house.

The overwhelming majority of our customers are working class people. It is SHOCKING how many of those guys live paycheck to paycheck but also just bought a new jet ski, quad, Razr, boat, gun, etc.

They are allergic to saving money or preparing for any bad thing to happen to them.

I can see both sides, especially with kids involved.

Financially everything you say is true. Time-wise, I am not so sure.

There is only a finite amount of time with family. Kids will only be 12 once. Once they get older they will lose that kid happiness of baseball with Dad. Can I afford, according to the financial rules, to do travel baseball and help him make the High School team? Is there a dollar value on those nights after games?

Even when they are older, it doesn't change. Now the clock ticks faster. Relatives die, wife wants to see where her family came from and show her kids. Financially, it is a horrible decision. Dollar value on going to Westphalen Germany and seeing where she and her kids heritage comes together?

I am not the best person to talk to about this subject. I watched people follow EVERY financial rule. Live frugally to the point of putting a timer on the hot water heater. To be able to travel to see grandkids in retirement. Only to die at 63 of Breast Cancer. Never take one trip. Spend their life sitting in a house saving for when they would be able to afford it, all the while the financial manager telling her to keep saving... Others sitting in ACLF's not able to do anything, but pay the ACLF. But they have money.

So, I am on the fence on this one. Not what the Baylor crowd will support based on my experience. But for those people, that jet ski with kids and grandkids may do more than any amount of money will do for an emergency fund. There are different sides to every equation.

Just another view.



Agreed. Many way to look at this. Hell, both my kids can't afford houses where they want so I get it.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

FLBear5630 said:

nein51 said:

J.R. said:

put in simple terms I even understand. Work your ass off, save your $, don't waste $...buy a house.

The overwhelming majority of our customers are working class people. It is SHOCKING how many of those guys live paycheck to paycheck but also just bought a new jet ski, quad, Razr, boat, gun, etc.

They are allergic to saving money or preparing for any bad thing to happen to them.

I can see both sides, especially with kids involved.

Financially everything you say is true. Time-wise, I am not so sure.

There is only a finite amount of time with family. Kids will only be 12 once. Once they get older they will lose that kid happiness of baseball with Dad. Can I afford, according to the financial rules, to do travel baseball and help him make the High School team? Is there a dollar value on those nights after games?

Even when they are older, it doesn't change. Now the clock ticks faster. Relatives die, wife wants to see where her family came from and show her kids. Financially, it is a horrible decision. Dollar value on going to Westphalen Germany and seeing where she and her kids heritage comes together?

I am not the best person to talk to about this subject. I watched people follow EVERY financial rule. Live frugally to the point of putting a timer on the hot water heater. To be able to travel to see grandkids in retirement. Only to die at 63 of Breast Cancer. Never take one trip. Spend their life sitting in a house saving for when they would be able to afford it, all the while the financial manager telling her to keep saving... Others sitting in ACLF's not able to do anything, but pay the ACLF. But they have money.

So, I am on the fence on this one. Not what the Baylor crowd will support based on my experience. But for those people, that jet ski with kids and grandkids may do more than any amount of money will do for an emergency fund. There are different sides to every equation.

Just another view.



Agreed. Many way to look at this. Hell, both my kids can't afford houses where they want so I get it.

Not saying it is right, just that I can understand why people make decisions. The ideal way is as the Financial professionals tell us. But, at the same time if you make a financial decision for other than fiscal reasons, don't ***** when you have too much debt, behind in your retirement or not able to afford something on credit. It is a two way street.

We made decisions on kids schooling that are going to add several years of work to hit retirement. Can't ***** about it at 60, you made a decisions stick by it.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

whiterock said:

nein51 said:

whiterock said:

nein51 said:

Some of you are really convinced that undocumented migrants, making $8/hr are buying homes.

Which sort of flies in the face of "houses are too expensive so gen whatever can't afford them".

In 2023 there were around 5,000 underwritten ITIN loans (that's is loans to people with no SSN).

The upward pressure argument makes sense if you mean rent for apartments and crap hole homes in terrible parts of down should go down…because that's where people that make $8/hr live.

don't let yourself be convinced that all illegals are making $8/hr. Once they gain some skill in the trades, the rate gets more competitive than that. Think $12-15/hr.

the upward pressure from illegal immigration is a known dynamic in real estate markets. Sure, 20m illegals do not create immediate demand for 20m homes. But it does have effect. we do not have 20m new housing starts a year. And yes, the impact is felt first in rental and low-income housing, by first-time homebuyers, the working class, etc....downward pressure on wages, upward pressure on housing prices. The wealthy typically profit from the dynamic. which fits Rob Henderson's "luxury beliefs" model = they tend to not mind illegal immigration at all because they benefit from it (lower labor costs, more equity in real estate) without having to bear the costs of it.

I

Tell you what let's say the average illegal makes $20/hr (they don't) this is about a 50 page thread about how millennials can't afford to buy homes because they don't make enough relative to the cost of housing.

You're going to have to work hard to convince me someone making $40,000 a year is buying up all the homes. I could be convinced but it's going to take a whole lot of logical argument.

You're making the same error that cowboy is. The problem is not that illegal aliens are buying the average $300k starter home in central Tx. The problem is that they are occupying dwellings.

There are only so many bedrooms in the country at any given time. When you create demand for those bedrooms that consistently exceeds supply, prices for those bedrooms will rise, even for rentals. When prices of rented bedrooms rise, it incentivizes renters to buy. Buying existing is cheaper per sq ft than buying new (so easier to qualify for). Every time someone buys an existing home, there is a seller who also needs a place to live, and typically had some equity from the sale to put down on a larger home. And of course when they do buy that larger home, there is now another seller who also needs a place to live (and on and on and on).

That dynamic may vary in intensity & complexion from place to place, but its all a response to basic macroeconomics. When illegal immigration causes population growth to accelerate faster than new home starts........REAL ESTATE PRICES WILL RISE.

(and, of course, the fed will try to choke off that cycle with higher interest rates........)


No I get what you're saying illegals take the space that poor people take, then poor people take the space the lower middle class take, then the lower middle class takes the space the middle class takes and so on

I'm saying I don't buy that argument as the demand for space at the poor people level doesn't shift upward because they can't afford for it to shift upward.

It is possible that illegals drive the price of low end housing up and it's absolutely true they are a strain on services but they are not the reason millennials can't buy homes imo.

That is not to say I'm pro illegal immigration because I'm definitely definitively not.

The "trading up" dynamic is a known thing....
https://shelterforce.org/2017/11/02/time-for-trickle-up-housing/
Basically, the market segments have soft edges. A shortage on the lower end, pressures a larger percentage of buyers to buy on the upper end of their own affordability. Since the segments have soft edges, or overlap, the ripples flow easily....in an upward direction where supply is tight, and in the opposite direction where supply is low (although there is more resistance to downward dynamics due to negative wealth effects). The forces tend to abate the further they get from origin, but they're still there, contributing with other factors to put upward pressure on pricing. And of course, wherever on the spectrum the shortages & price increases are happening, it all gets picked up in "average cost" type datasets.

Within that, of course not all factors bear equally within those segments. As a rule, the middle of the market tends to get squeezed harder. For the top end, new starts are sensitive to interest rates, but otherwise housing prices tend to be largely a wealth effect......they have all the house they need, exactly what they like & where, so increasing prices just increase equity with just pads the balance sheet. On the other end, the inverse is true....most there have no real wealth. Housing is a monthly expense. At some point, increases in rents make purchasing look more attractive. Down payments & credit history are limiting factors, but there are govt programs to assist (sometimes to many of them, as we saw in the sub-prime crisis). In between are young families (needing larger houses to fit growing families) and working classes (who tend to move around in response to job opportunities).

That's all microeconomic stuff. At the macro level, pressures anywhere on the scale tend to ripple out. No, a shortage of rental housing is not going to cause corresponding movements in prices on the other end of the scale. But the adjacent segments are going to get pinched. And the response of those adjacent segments will pinch the next segment. a newer factor in all of that: institutional investment in single family homes as income property. That of course competes directly with home buyers to increase demand and provide more upward pressure on prices. (for now, let's not talk about how trade deficit-driven surplus dollars affect that......)


tacos & toilet paper. Every time someone crosses the border, demand for those things goes up. They have to sleep somewhere, sometimes even in hotels at govt expense (which does tend to drive up prices for motel rooms). and on and on and on. Population growth is the most powerful stimulus available. It's why we've seen so much of it.
sombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think we're overlooking far more important factors:

- finite/landlocked land and increasing population means higher prices
- folks are marrying later; married buy more houses than single
- location is far more important to younger folks; E.g., they'd much rather rent in Uptown Dallas than buy a house in Rowlett or Farmer's branch. I'm 56. Virtually everyone I knew bought "starter homes," and that meant a smaller home in a less desirable area, and slowly but surely moved up and out.
- the most desirable locations (i.e., cities and closer burbs) haven't had excess land on which to build for decades. That means major increases in value.
- younger folks are less likely to stay with one employer and in one area; that means less likely to have interest in purchasing a home.

As many on here do, I travel frequently. There are still very affordable homes throughout the country in good areas with good schools, amenities, etc. The extremes do not tell the real story on the ground.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

nein51 said:

whiterock said:

nein51 said:

whiterock said:

nein51 said:

Some of you are really convinced that undocumented migrants, making $8/hr are buying homes.

Which sort of flies in the face of "houses are too expensive so gen whatever can't afford them".

In 2023 there were around 5,000 underwritten ITIN loans (that's is loans to people with no SSN).

The upward pressure argument makes sense if you mean rent for apartments and crap hole homes in terrible parts of down should go down…because that's where people that make $8/hr live.

don't let yourself be convinced that all illegals are making $8/hr. Once they gain some skill in the trades, the rate gets more competitive than that. Think $12-15/hr.

the upward pressure from illegal immigration is a known dynamic in real estate markets. Sure, 20m illegals do not create immediate demand for 20m homes. But it does have effect. we do not have 20m new housing starts a year. And yes, the impact is felt first in rental and low-income housing, by first-time homebuyers, the working class, etc....downward pressure on wages, upward pressure on housing prices. The wealthy typically profit from the dynamic. which fits Rob Henderson's "luxury beliefs" model = they tend to not mind illegal immigration at all because they benefit from it (lower labor costs, more equity in real estate) without having to bear the costs of it.

I

Tell you what let's say the average illegal makes $20/hr (they don't) this is about a 50 page thread about how millennials can't afford to buy homes because they don't make enough relative to the cost of housing.

You're going to have to work hard to convince me someone making $40,000 a year is buying up all the homes. I could be convinced but it's going to take a whole lot of logical argument.

You're making the same error that cowboy is. The problem is not that illegal aliens are buying the average $300k starter home in central Tx. The problem is that they are occupying dwellings.

There are only so many bedrooms in the country at any given time. When you create demand for those bedrooms that consistently exceeds supply, prices for those bedrooms will rise, even for rentals. When prices of rented bedrooms rise, it incentivizes renters to buy. Buying existing is cheaper per sq ft than buying new (so easier to qualify for). Every time someone buys an existing home, there is a seller who also needs a place to live, and typically had some equity from the sale to put down on a larger home. And of course when they do buy that larger home, there is now another seller who also needs a place to live (and on and on and on).

That dynamic may vary in intensity & complexion from place to place, but its all a response to basic macroeconomics. When illegal immigration causes population growth to accelerate faster than new home starts........REAL ESTATE PRICES WILL RISE.

(and, of course, the fed will try to choke off that cycle with higher interest rates........)


No I get what you're saying illegals take the space that poor people take, then poor people take the space the lower middle class take, then the lower middle class takes the space the middle class takes and so on

I'm saying I don't buy that argument as the demand for space at the poor people level doesn't shift upward because they can't afford for it to shift upward.

It is possible that illegals drive the price of low end housing up and it's absolutely true they are a strain on services but they are not the reason millennials can't buy homes imo.

That is not to say I'm pro illegal immigration because I'm definitely definitively not.

The "trading up" dynamic is a known thing....
https://shelterforce.org/2017/11/02/time-for-trickle-up-housing/
Basically, the market segments have soft edges. A shortage on the lower end, pressures a larger percentage of buyers to buy on the upper end of their own affordability. Since the segments have soft edges, or overlap, the ripples flow easily....in an upward direction where supply is tight…

Within that, of course not all factors bear equally within those segments. As a rule, the middle of the market tends to get squeezed harder…


tacos & toilet paper. Every time someone crosses the border, demand for those things goes up. They have to sleep somewhere, sometimes even in hotels at govt expense (which does tend to drive up prices for motel rooms). and on and on and on.


Great point and a big reason why the American middle class feels so stressed and pressured

In a way the rich don't

My wife and I are forced to pay a premium to live in home we do and send our kids to private school. Because we have to escape the dysfunction so prevalent in modern America and a wish not to deal with over crowded immigrant heavy schools were education takes a back seat to simply trying to communicate with the new kids.

My wife and I are products of Texas public schools in the 1990s….yet that has seen a massive transformation in the past 30 years.

Even more so from our parent's generation….My wife's aunt had a teacher killed by a student at her old East Texas high school.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

whiterock said:

nein51 said:

whiterock said:

nein51 said:

whiterock said:

nein51 said:

Some of you are really convinced that undocumented migrants, making $8/hr are buying homes.

Which sort of flies in the face of "houses are too expensive so gen whatever can't afford them".

In 2023 there were around 5,000 underwritten ITIN loans (that's is loans to people with no SSN).

The upward pressure argument makes sense if you mean rent for apartments and crap hole homes in terrible parts of down should go down…because that's where people that make $8/hr live.

don't let yourself be convinced that all illegals are making $8/hr. Once they gain some skill in the trades, the rate gets more competitive than that. Think $12-15/hr.

the upward pressure from illegal immigration is a known dynamic in real estate markets. Sure, 20m illegals do not create immediate demand for 20m homes. But it does have effect. we do not have 20m new housing starts a year. And yes, the impact is felt first in rental and low-income housing, by first-time homebuyers, the working class, etc....downward pressure on wages, upward pressure on housing prices. The wealthy typically profit from the dynamic. which fits Rob Henderson's "luxury beliefs" model = they tend to not mind illegal immigration at all because they benefit from it (lower labor costs, more equity in real estate) without having to bear the costs of it.

I

Tell you what let's say the average illegal makes $20/hr (they don't) this is about a 50 page thread about how millennials can't afford to buy homes because they don't make enough relative to the cost of housing.

You're going to have to work hard to convince me someone making $40,000 a year is buying up all the homes. I could be convinced but it's going to take a whole lot of logical argument.

You're making the same error that cowboy is. The problem is not that illegal aliens are buying the average $300k starter home in central Tx. The problem is that they are occupying dwellings.

There are only so many bedrooms in the country at any given time. When you create demand for those bedrooms that consistently exceeds supply, prices for those bedrooms will rise, even for rentals. When prices of rented bedrooms rise, it incentivizes renters to buy. Buying existing is cheaper per sq ft than buying new (so easier to qualify for). Every time someone buys an existing home, there is a seller who also needs a place to live, and typically had some equity from the sale to put down on a larger home. And of course when they do buy that larger home, there is now another seller who also needs a place to live (and on and on and on).

That dynamic may vary in intensity & complexion from place to place, but its all a response to basic macroeconomics. When illegal immigration causes population growth to accelerate faster than new home starts........REAL ESTATE PRICES WILL RISE.

(and, of course, the fed will try to choke off that cycle with higher interest rates........)


No I get what you're saying illegals take the space that poor people take, then poor people take the space the lower middle class take, then the lower middle class takes the space the middle class takes and so on

I'm saying I don't buy that argument as the demand for space at the poor people level doesn't shift upward because they can't afford for it to shift upward.

It is possible that illegals drive the price of low end housing up and it's absolutely true they are a strain on services but they are not the reason millennials can't buy homes imo.

That is not to say I'm pro illegal immigration because I'm definitely definitively not.

The "trading up" dynamic is a known thing....
https://shelterforce.org/2017/11/02/time-for-trickle-up-housing/
Basically, the market segments have soft edges. A shortage on the lower end, pressures a larger percentage of buyers to buy on the upper end of their own affordability. Since the segments have soft edges, or overlap, the ripples flow easily....in an upward direction where supply is tight…

Within that, of course not all factors bear equally within those segments. As a rule, the middle of the market tends to get squeezed harder…


tacos & toilet paper. Every time someone crosses the border, demand for those things goes up. They have to sleep somewhere, sometimes even in hotels at govt expense (which does tend to drive up prices for motel rooms). and on and on and on.


Great point and a big reason why the American middle class feels so stressed and pressured

In a way the rich don't
Rob Henderson's "luxury values" is an incredibly timely observation. Ruling classes have lost touch with the common man on a long list of policy issue

My wife and I are forced to pay a premium to live in home we do and send our kids to private school. Because we have to escape the dysfunction so prevalent in modern America and a wish not to deal with over crowded immigrant heavy schools were education takes a back seat to simply trying to communicate with the new kids.

My wife and I are products of Texas public schools in the 1990s….yet that has seen a massive transformation in the past 30 years.

Even more so from our parent's generation….My wife's aunt had a teacher killed by a student at her old East Texas high school.

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?

FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:




That is an education issue, nothing else. It used to be taught that independence and carving ones own way, even if not as successful, was a positive. Now, they are taught that all that matters is money at the end of the day. So, rather than struggling in a crappy apartment it is told to them that it is better to live with Mom and Dad. Failure to Launch...
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

Redbrickbear said:




That is an education issue, nothing else. It used to be taught that independence and carving ones own way, even if not as successful, was a positive. Now, they are taught that all that matters is money at the end of the day. So, rather than struggling in a crappy apartment it is told to them that it is better to live with Mom and Dad. Failure to Launch...

My boy wants to go to college at Texas State Technical College and is interested in the Surgical Tech program. After reading all of their literature, apparently most hospitals that he would receive his hands on training are STILL requiring a damn Covid shot. I thought we were past this. No way in Hell my 24 year old son is getting a Covid vaccine with all the data out there regarding increased risk of Myocarditis and Pericarditis. He is very disappointed. He will probably need to pick another career path.

Call it a tax, the people are outraged! Call it a tariff, the people get out their checkbooks and wave their American flags!!!
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.