Trump's first 100 days

25,463 Views | 763 Replies | Last: 40 min ago by KaiBear
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:



Ahh... The pizza guy was at the door and you beat me to it. +1
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:


That's huge!
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Married A Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

Married A Horn said:

FLBear5630 said:

nein51 said:

FLBear5630 said:

nein51 said:

FLBear5630 said:

nein51 said:

China has a much greater ability to manipulate their currency.
1) they are second only to the Dollar
2) they literally don't care about their own people so things like inflation, starvation and wealth of the general population mean 0

Canada simply doesn't hold that kind of power.

I do not understand what we are trying to accomplish here at all but Canada just doesn't have the bargaining strength China does.
I agree in terms of leverage with the US. Leverage in where they get their goods in the future? That is where I see this going with both Mexico and Canada. Tariffs make the American product more competitive in our market. But it also makes Chinese and EU goods more competitive to the Canadians and Mexicans by offsetting transportation cost. Funny, a lot of times the way you go about something makes a lot of difference. The way Trump is doing it is making me say, I will be damned and pay more somewhere else rather than give you a win. Trump sometimes forgets money is not the only motivator...

So on a personal level I agree. I have made a lot of purchases recently based on them being US made even though it was at much greater cost (try buying a U.S. made power inverter these days).

However, you and I are not the majority of consumers. Money is the primary motivator for probably 95% of all purchases.

I sell high end stuff and we do quite well. The only other company like ours seeing positive returns is a Chinese competitor that is killing our competition but selling sub par products. Customers don't care.
So, in the bigger arena do the Canadian consumers get those choices? As you said, the customers don't care it is Chinese. If it is cheaper they could care less if it is US or Chinese. Will Canada cut deals they wouldn't have 10 years ago? I don't know. By interesting to see this play out.

Question, is it harder to win back a market after losing it or keeping it? Why do this?

What is keeping them from buying those products from China now? I would venture the answer is nothing.

However Canada is land locked on the Southern Border where most of its population is. It's entirely possible that getting stuff from China into a Canadian port city then from the port to the retailer then to the consumer is simply too expensive.


Canada has been a US Allie for a very long time. I would say we have set up a lot of trade based on convenience and hemisphere strength, such as pipelines. I do not think those things are very important anymore.


Hey, would you mind getting on the calgary stampede boards and start railing against all of their triple digit tarrifs on us? Let us know how it goes.


Seriously, what triple figure tariffs? See this is a discussion. I say something, u bring up reason why I am off base. I listen. Maybe I learn something, maybe you do. Been happening all the way and back to Socrates. No name calling.


Lots of dairy are around 300%. Poultry and other farm products. Vehicles made in the USA. Wood / lumber. Its not a fair system... they can impose tariffs and protections but we cant? Mexico is probably worse.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:


And now that they know he will move tariffs to 50%, they are going to listen and do whatever he says
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
TinFoilHatPreacherBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pretty sure Justin will be asked about them freezing out the American dairy producers.

Quote:


Recently:
The Trudeau government is celebrating what it's calling an absolute victory in its latest trade dispute with the United States over dairy imports.

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Married A Horn said:

FLBear5630 said:

Married A Horn said:

FLBear5630 said:

nein51 said:

FLBear5630 said:

nein51 said:

FLBear5630 said:

nein51 said:

China has a much greater ability to manipulate their currency.
1) they are second only to the Dollar
2) they literally don't care about their own people so things like inflation, starvation and wealth of the general population mean 0

Canada simply doesn't hold that kind of power.

I do not understand what we are trying to accomplish here at all but Canada just doesn't have the bargaining strength China does.
I agree in terms of leverage with the US. Leverage in where they get their goods in the future? That is where I see this going with both Mexico and Canada. Tariffs make the American product more competitive in our market. But it also makes Chinese and EU goods more competitive to the Canadians and Mexicans by offsetting transportation cost. Funny, a lot of times the way you go about something makes a lot of difference. The way Trump is doing it is making me say, I will be damned and pay more somewhere else rather than give you a win. Trump sometimes forgets money is not the only motivator...

So on a personal level I agree. I have made a lot of purchases recently based on them being US made even though it was at much greater cost (try buying a U.S. made power inverter these days).

However, you and I are not the majority of consumers. Money is the primary motivator for probably 95% of all purchases.

I sell high end stuff and we do quite well. The only other company like ours seeing positive returns is a Chinese competitor that is killing our competition but selling sub par products. Customers don't care.
So, in the bigger arena do the Canadian consumers get those choices? As you said, the customers don't care it is Chinese. If it is cheaper they could care less if it is US or Chinese. Will Canada cut deals they wouldn't have 10 years ago? I don't know. By interesting to see this play out.

Question, is it harder to win back a market after losing it or keeping it? Why do this?

What is keeping them from buying those products from China now? I would venture the answer is nothing.

However Canada is land locked on the Southern Border where most of its population is. It's entirely possible that getting stuff from China into a Canadian port city then from the port to the retailer then to the consumer is simply too expensive.


Canada has been a US Allie for a very long time. I would say we have set up a lot of trade based on convenience and hemisphere strength, such as pipelines. I do not think those things are very important anymore.


Hey, would you mind getting on the calgary stampede boards and start railing against all of their triple digit tarrifs on us? Let us know how it goes.


Seriously, what triple figure tariffs? See this is a discussion. I say something, u bring up reason why I am off base. I listen. Maybe I learn something, maybe you do. Been happening all the way and back to Socrates. No name calling.


Lots of dairy are around 300%. Poultry and other farm products. Vehicles made in the USA. Wood / lumber. Its not a fair system... they can impose tariffs and protections but we cant? Mexico is probably worse.


Fair enough. Wish people would put up info like that as why we do something. Trump explains nothing and pokes annexation. Threats on Twitter. Makes it look vindictive, not retaliatory. People don't know all the details. You obviously know something about farm tariffs, I would not.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:


The EU was taken over and subjugated by George Soros a long time ago. The first step of his one world order and his Open Society. That was the purpose behind all the relocation of 3rd world folks into the various European countries.
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
TinFoilHatPreacherBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:






Please sell, I will be buying.
Married A Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I would like to know more on the Mexican tariffs. What do they charge on our exports to them?
Married A Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A 500 point drop on the Dow is not huge. If the meeting with Canada and Mexico shows progress on the fentanyl front, they could easily go right back up.
TinFoilHatPreacherBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Then sky is falling. Please get on board.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Married A Horn said:

I would like to know more on the Mexican tariffs. What do they charge on our exports to them?


Me too. I would like some details. For example, his UK/EU rant.. I have no idea what he is talking about. Showing what they are doing vs what we were doing would really help. We seem to get words with no context. Mexico, Fentanyl, Tariffs, Cartel, etc... a little back story for those of us that don't follow every aspect of Trump world.

This is the part of the Tarantino movie we are living where Samuel L Jackson narrates the back story....

He may have good reasons, but he is doing a poor job of relying them. This either you believe in everything I say and do with no info is BS.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

whiterock said:

ATL Bear said:

whiterock said:

ATL Bear said:

boognish_bear said:


Even worse it's a sales tax, meaning it will simply be transferred to consumers to foot the bill. And ironically, they're inflationary. Furthermore, these tariffs are at a level that doesn't even get close to bridging the comparative advantage cost and scale that drives import/export competitiveness. I mean China could flood the market with steel keeping the price low regardless of tariffs. Oh sure, we'll get a few swipes at allies to the north and Europe because they're in a comparable cost and regulatory swamp, but when you raise the cost of inputs, the first target companies go cost cutting at is labor.

Usually the long game is to incentivize and deregulate sectors so you can encourage the long term investments necessary to build the facilities and capacities to engineer a market supplier shift. But tariffs hit instantly and change the market dynamic and serve as an actual disincentive, particularly for labor expansion. It's not anti-MAGA, it's economics you can research from people like Milton Friedman.
Funny no one very says the income tax is inflationary.
Funny no one says the SSN tax is inflationary.
Funny no one says state sales taxes are inflationary.
Funny no on says state property taxes are inflationary.

Government SPENDING is inflationary.
That's because personal income tax is paid from earnings, and technically SSN is a pension payment. But corporate income taxes could be argued as inflationary. State sales taxes are post cost of goods. If we did a universal consumption tax/sales tax (as some argue for) we'd likely have a reduction in inflation. Government DEFICIT SPENDING is inflationary.
If Government deficit spending is inflationary, then the taxation source to fund it is irrelevant.

How is a tariff on an imported Chinese beach ball any different than a state sales tax on that Chinese beach ball?
Government deficit spending requires borrowing, which results in an increase in the money supply. This devalues currency, thus creating inflation on a range of things. If they only spend what they collect, they do not contribute to inflation.

A tariff creates cost-push inflation by increasing the cost of production. We literally spent four years complaining about cost push inflation during the Biden admin, and rightly so. Now it's somehow not a thing? And state sales tax isn't part of the cost of production. Europe's VAT tax scheme functions more like an inflationary sales tax.


A tax is a tax. Tariffs are no more inflationary than sales taxes.

and the purpose of these tariffs is not for revenue generation. Trump's comments make it abundantly clear the tariffs he's talking about are being used as a stick in foreign policy negotiations. "Do what we ask or we will drive you from our markets with escalating tariffs."

The negotiations are likely to conclude very early with Canada, given the weakness of their negotiating position. Mexico might take longer, but it's a much bigger problem. Trump is try to convey to Mexico that they should be more worried about what the USA will do than what the drug cartels will do.




whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

Mexico is controlled by the drug cartels. The Mexican president is their puppet.

Short of going to war over all the fentanyl Mexico is smuggling into the United States……tariffs are the only answer to coerce Mexico into stopping these poisons.

Over 100,000 Americans are dying from overdoses each year.
Talk hasn't worked.

Bingo.

Mexico is a borderline failing state due to drug cartel influence. Trump is trying to teach Mexico that they should be more worried about what the USA might do than what the cartels might do.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
USAID Website Goes Dark As Trump Reportedly Plans To Shift Agency Under State Department

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/usaid-website-goes-dark-trump-reportedly-plans-shift-agency-under-state-department

"A post from Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) account on X clarified that USAID went on a woke spending spree in third-world countries...

At this point we need to end ALL foreign aid. Not a single American taxpayer cent should leave the country for a very very long time. It's all money laundering.
Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) January 15, 2025

Musk responded "True" to Robby Starbuck's post about USAID laundering taxpayer funds "for Democrats in DC." And even explained how it worked:

Annnnd the USAid website is now down.

Try it: https://t.co/lvZf3F02sp pic.twitter.com/teB9WPVe6D
Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) February 2, 2025

"Like I said before, USAID is a front for the CIA. And together with NGO's like the Open Society Foundation, they have been using US tax dollars & govt resources as their personal piggy bank. It has been infuriating to watch. Hopefully now the whole truth will come out," journalist Lara Logan wrote on X. "

Good riddance.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

USAID Website Goes Dark As Trump Reportedly Plans To Shift Agency Under State Department

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/usaid-website-goes-dark-trump-reportedly-plans-shift-agency-under-state-department

"A post from Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) account on X clarified that USAID went on a woke spending spree in third-world countries...

At this point we need to end ALL foreign aid. Not a single American taxpayer cent should leave the country for a very very long time. It's all money laundering.
Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) January 15, 2025

Musk responded "True" to Robby Starbuck's post about USAID laundering taxpayer funds "for Democrats in DC." And even explained how it worked:

Annnnd the USAid website is now down.

Try it: https://t.co/lvZf3F02sp pic.twitter.com/teB9WPVe6D
Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) February 2, 2025

"Like I said before, USAID is a front for the CIA. And together with NGO's like the Open Society Foundation, they have been using US tax dollars & govt resources as their personal piggy bank. It has been infuriating to watch. Hopefully now the whole truth will come out," journalist Lara Logan wrote on X. "

Good riddance.
USAID is not a front for the CIA. It's a great big billboard for the USG. There are actually fairly robust legal prohibitions about entanglement of USAID and any covert operations by any USG agency. We avoided the USAID folks like the plague. They didn't come to dinner at our houses; we weren't invited to theirs. There is a method to that madness - nothing would undermine the effectiveness of US aid programs more quickly than being tainted as a tool of covert US policies. Allowing such to occur is policy malpractice - covert funding by definition is NOT supposed to be associated with the USG, so why use USAID to do such? (we don't. makes no sense whatsoever.) As long as the USG is going to give away aid, there has to be some kind of unit to administrate it. Trump appears to be of a mind that such a unit belongs as an office in the State Dept rather than a stand alone agency. There's merit in that suggestion. It will more effectively yoke USAID to foreign policy objectives, rather than letting it run a morality play of its own.

Seems obvious there is evidence that USAID monies have been usurped by NGOs for domestic partisan purposes. That should be investigated. Where improprieties have occurred, perp walks are in order. And I suspect we will see some on down the road a bit.
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Alberto Mora Former General Counsel for the U.S. Navy (George W. Bush Admin), known for opposing torture policies. Now Assoc. Exec. Dir. of Global Programs at American Bar Association Fund for Justice and Education (EIN: 366110299). $229,970

Anne Richard Former Assistant Secretary of State for Population, Refugees, and Migration (Obama Admin). Listed as Senior Advisor, AHRCM at Freedom House (EIN: 131656647). $179,406

Derek Mitchell Former U.S. Ambassador to Myanmar (Obama Admin) and Pentagon advisor. Now President (thru 9/2023) at National Democratic Institute (EIN: 521338892). $344,681

Daniel Fisk Former National Security Council official (George W. Bush Admin), State Department veteran. Now Chief Operations Officer at International Republican Institute (EIN: 521340267). $163,055

Dr. Daniel Twining Former State Department Policy Planner (Bush Admin), advisor on democracy promotion. Now President at International Republican Institute (EIN: 521340267). $405,724

Anthony Banbury Former UN Assistant Secretary-General, served under Clinton, Bush, Obama on peacekeeping & crisis response. Now President & CEO at International Foundation for Electoral Systems (EIN: 521527835). $372,157

Paige Alexander Former USAID Assistant Administrator for Europe & Eurasia (Obama Admin). Now CEO of The Carter Center (EIN: 581454716). $424,902

Damon Wilson Former Special Assistant to President George W. Bush and NATO advisor. Now President & CEO at National Endowment for Democracy (EIN: 521344831). $368,965

Maju Varghese Former White House Deputy Assistant & Director of the Office of Administration (Biden Admin). Now Chief Operating Officer at National Endowment for Democracy (EIN: 521344831). $257,883

Carl Gershman Longtime President of National Endowment for Democracy (since Reagan Admin, spanning GOP & Democratic administrations). Now listed as Former President at NED (EIN: 521344831). $250,000

Dr. Allan Goodman Former Executive Dean at Georgetown's School of Foreign Service, played key roles in education diplomacy under multiple administrations. Now CEO/Trustee at Institute of International Education (EIN: 131624046). $787,536

KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

KaiBear said:

Mexico is controlled by the drug cartels. The Mexican president is their puppet.

Short of going to war over all the fentanyl Mexico is smuggling into the United States……tariffs are the only answer to coerce Mexico into stopping these poisons.

Over 100,000 Americans are dying from overdoses each year.
Talk hasn't worked.

Bingo.

Mexico is a borderline failing state due to drug cartel influence. Trump is trying to teach Mexico that they should be more worried about what the USA might do than what the cartels might do.


In Mexico the politicians either accept money from the cartels or get assassinated by them.

Been a common reality for almost 20 years.

Mexican journalists who appose the cartels often get assassinated. I personally know at least two Mexican business owners who were told by the cartels to give up a minimum of 30% of their profit or shut down …..or be killed.

Both shut down their businesses.

I realize it is difficult to. believe that such a draconian situation exists, especially so close to our country.

But it does.

I give Trump a massive amount of credit for publicly declaring the realities involved. Hope the American people can be patient enough to let his plan unfold.
TinFoilHatPreacherBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

whiterock said:

KaiBear said:

Mexico is controlled by the drug cartels. The Mexican president is their puppet.

Short of going to war over all the fentanyl Mexico is smuggling into the United States……tariffs are the only answer to coerce Mexico into stopping these poisons.

Over 100,000 Americans are dying from overdoses each year.
Talk hasn't worked.

Bingo.

Mexico is a borderline failing state due to drug cartel influence. Trump is trying to teach Mexico that they should be more worried about what the USA might do than what the cartels might do.


In Mexico the politicians either accept money from the cartels or get assassinated by them.

Been a common reality for almost 20 years.

Mexican journalists who appose the cartels often get assassinated. I personally know at least two Mexican business owners who were told by the cartels to give up a minimum of 30% of their profit or shut down …..or be killed.

Both shut down their businesses.

I realize it is difficult to. believe that such a draconian situation exists, especially so close to our country.

But it does.

I give Trump a massive amount of credit for publicly declaring the realities involved. Hope the American people can be patient enough to let his plan unfold.


Well you see the TDSers here, they want their hands held and sweet nothings proclaimed.

And Trump continues to be correct, yet they continue to ignore and dismiss that.
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If this video is real involving the Ukrainian President, if the translation is accurate…..US media should be rebroadcasting it everywhere.

Musk has a huge job in front of him. Hope he has a huge staff to help him.
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Reading this and more and more from both sides of the argument. If true bold in #2 is quite a statement.

Jeffrey Carter: The Tariff Game
https://jeffreycarter.substack.com/p/the-tariff-game


Quote:

Every Democrat took to X and said, Trump campaigned on ending inflation but tariffs are going to increase inflation.

This is just a point of information for those panicking about tariffs. If the US charges a 25% tariff on Canadian goods, and the Canadian dollar drops by 25% in value compared to the US Dollar, Americans will still pay the same price. EDIT to add Reuters article ... Canadian dollar posts longest monthly losing streak since 2016 https://www.reuters.com/markets/currencies/canadian-dollar-dips-volatile-trading-tariff-implementation-uncertainty-2025-01-31/

Here is what I think will happen.
[ol]
  • Tariffs are a disincentive to growth. Slower growth means lower inflation.
  • The way $DOGE is working, they are uncovering billions and billions of government largesse and waste. We will see budget cuts in the 20% of the budget that is discretionary. Interestingly, if we spent at 2019 levels and took in taxes as we did in 2023, the US Budget would be in surplus and we'd be paying debt down. Ending 100% of all payments to NGOs is a fantastic idea. We will save trillions.
  • Real estate is going to drop in value. Especially in DC, and areas in Maryland, in Virginia adjacent to DC. CRE leases by the government won't be renewed. Homes are going on the market as government employees retire, quit, or get fired. In some areas of the country, speculators bought up buildings and homes. They filled them with illegal aliens and collected government checks. Game over on that game. More real estate on the market.
  • Everyone thinks that we will see higher rates of interest on FinX. They are wrong. We are going to see interest rate decreases.
  • [/ol]
    Married A Horn
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Realitybites said:

    USAID Website Goes Dark As Trump Reportedly Plans To Shift Agency Under State Department

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/usaid-website-goes-dark-trump-reportedly-plans-shift-agency-under-state-department

    "A post from Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) account on X clarified that USAID went on a woke spending spree in third-world countries...

    At this point we need to end ALL foreign aid. Not a single American taxpayer cent should leave the country for a very very long time. It's all money laundering.
    Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) January 15, 2025

    Musk responded "True" to Robby Starbuck's post about USAID laundering taxpayer funds "for Democrats in DC." And even explained how it worked:

    Annnnd the USAid website is now down.

    Try it: https://t.co/lvZf3F02sp pic.twitter.com/teB9WPVe6D
    Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) February 2, 2025

    "Like I said before, USAID is a front for the CIA. And together with NGO's like the Open Society Foundation, they have been using US tax dollars & govt resources as their personal piggy bank. It has been infuriating to watch. Hopefully now the whole truth will come out," journalist Lara Logan wrote on X. "

    Good riddance.


    Not as important as deporting the illegals, this one is my favorite. Ever wonder how AOC who has been in congress a few years on a salary of $155,000 per year has seen her net worth go from ZERO to $29,000,000??? This is how.
    This (along with not going to jail) is why they hate Trump so much and cheat so badly to stay in power.

    He doesnt need to just turn it off. This is where prosecution needs to happen. And if it was all done 'legally' then he needs to make it very public how the dems (and whatever republicans were doing it too) we scamming hundreds of millions of tax payer dollars for their own pockets.

    I think this could be the single most fun thing this administration does. Let's see how it unfolds.
    Married A Horn
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Jacques Strap said:



    Alberto Mora Former General Counsel for the U.S. Navy (George W. Bush Admin), known for opposing torture policies. Now Assoc. Exec. Dir. of Global Programs at American Bar Association Fund for Justice and Education (EIN: 366110299). $229,970

    Anne Richard Former Assistant Secretary of State for Population, Refugees, and Migration (Obama Admin). Listed as Senior Advisor, AHRCM at Freedom House (EIN: 131656647). $179,406

    Derek Mitchell Former U.S. Ambassador to Myanmar (Obama Admin) and Pentagon advisor. Now President (thru 9/2023) at National Democratic Institute (EIN: 521338892). $344,681

    Daniel Fisk Former National Security Council official (George W. Bush Admin), State Department veteran. Now Chief Operations Officer at International Republican Institute (EIN: 521340267). $163,055

    Dr. Daniel Twining Former State Department Policy Planner (Bush Admin), advisor on democracy promotion. Now President at International Republican Institute (EIN: 521340267). $405,724

    Anthony Banbury Former UN Assistant Secretary-General, served under Clinton, Bush, Obama on peacekeeping & crisis response. Now President & CEO at International Foundation for Electoral Systems (EIN: 521527835). $372,157

    Paige Alexander Former USAID Assistant Administrator for Europe & Eurasia (Obama Admin). Now CEO of The Carter Center (EIN: 581454716). $424,902

    Damon Wilson Former Special Assistant to President George W. Bush and NATO advisor. Now President & CEO at National Endowment for Democracy (EIN: 521344831). $368,965

    Maju Varghese Former White House Deputy Assistant & Director of the Office of Administration (Biden Admin). Now Chief Operating Officer at National Endowment for Democracy (EIN: 521344831). $257,883

    Carl Gershman Longtime President of National Endowment for Democracy (since Reagan Admin, spanning GOP & Democratic administrations). Now listed as Former President at NED (EIN: 521344831). $250,000

    Dr. Allan Goodman Former Executive Dean at Georgetown's School of Foreign Service, played key roles in education diplomacy under multiple administrations. Now CEO/Trustee at Institute of International Education (EIN: 131624046). $787,536




    Lots of Bush guys in there. Not a shocker.
    boognish_bear
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Not a surprise....I'll be curious to see where we are at the end of the day. Will probably be some growing pains ahead as things self-correct.

    Redbrickbear
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Married A Horn said:

    Jacques Strap said:



    Alberto Mora Former General Counsel for the U.S. Navy (George W. Bush Admin), known for opposing torture policies. Now Assoc. Exec. Dir. of Global Programs at American Bar Association Fund for Justice and Education (EIN: 366110299). $229,970

    Anne Richard Former Assistant Secretary of State for Population, Refugees, and Migration (Obama Admin). Listed as Senior Advisor, AHRCM at Freedom House (EIN: 131656647). $179,406

    Derek Mitchell Former U.S. Ambassador to Myanmar (Obama Admin) and Pentagon advisor. Now President (thru 9/2023) at National Democratic Institute (EIN: 521338892). $344,681

    Daniel Fisk Former National Security Council official (George W. Bush Admin), State Department veteran. Now Chief Operations Officer at International Republican Institute (EIN: 521340267). $163,055

    Dr. Daniel Twining Former State Department Policy Planner (Bush Admin), advisor on democracy promotion. Now President at International Republican Institute (EIN: 521340267). $405,724

    Anthony Banbury Former UN Assistant Secretary-General, served under Clinton, Bush, Obama on peacekeeping & crisis response. Now President & CEO at International Foundation for Electoral Systems (EIN: 521527835). $372,157

    Paige Alexander Former USAID Assistant Administrator for Europe & Eurasia (Obama Admin). Now CEO of The Carter Center (EIN: 581454716). $424,902

    Damon Wilson Former Special Assistant to President George W. Bush and NATO advisor. Now President & CEO at National Endowment for Democracy (EIN: 521344831). $368,965

    Maju Varghese Former White House Deputy Assistant & Director of the Office of Administration (Biden Admin). Now Chief Operating Officer at National Endowment for Democracy (EIN: 521344831). $257,883

    Carl Gershman Longtime President of National Endowment for Democracy (since Reagan Admin, spanning GOP & Democratic administrations). Now listed as Former President at NED (EIN: 521344831). $250,000

    Dr. Allan Goodman Former Executive Dean at Georgetown's School of Foreign Service, played key roles in education diplomacy under multiple administrations. Now CEO/Trustee at Institute of International Education (EIN: 131624046). $787,536




    Lots of Bush guys in there. Not a shocker.

    Definitely not a shocker

    Another of the reasons that side of the Party (Liz Cheney Republicans) fought like hell against Trump

    They are deep into the corruption and tax payer theft just like the Democrats
    Married A Horn
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Exactly.
     
    ×
    subscribe Verify your student status
    See Subscription Benefits
    Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.