Trump's first 100 days

107,370 Views | 2776 Replies | Last: 27 min ago by Osodecentx
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUbearinARK said:

FLBear5630 said:

Oldbear83 said:

FLBear5630 said:

Married A Horn said:

I agree with that 20 years ago. Even if you dont yet - you may soon.

Financial security of the nation takes priority over all the things technology is making obsolete. NASA is probably right behind NWS for me. If not before it... idk.
Problem with relying on the Private sector is that they only do what is profitable. The NWS infrastructure provides the base for their forecasts. The State 511 systems work with NWS. The private sector works with the NWS. Marine forecasts. The list goes on. The private sector does not invest in that type of infrastructure. Sorry, Public safety is not where you cut.
The problem is not the hardware, it's the soft brains of most of the staff we are rightfully cutting loose for their true calling as dogwalkers and baristas.
You guys are truly clowns. Bet you loved Trump and Vance's act today as well.


The actor wasn't trump or Vance

It was the former comic reprising that role. He was even in costume!
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Are they booing DOGE?

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:


Guessing that the terms of the mineral rights changed too. I think it started at $200b, then $300 and now $500b
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

boognish_bear said:



Does it? Or does it show that politics are a lot more complex than people think.

I recall a much more skilled politician campaigning on then doubling down (numerous times) on closing Guantanamo


That has nothing to do with Obama ordering it to happened and bureaucrats refusing

It has to do with the logistics of who would take these terrorists, who could be tied, where, under what rules, and if American trial attorneys could get a cut

This is a file on a single guy….they fact they won't just release the info is telling
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:




Remember when we were told that this was impossible to solve…or that we had to go with the border bill pushed by Oklahoma Republican James Lankford (backed by Mitch McConnell) that locked in high migration levels for 4 years (would have tied Trumps hands)

God what lie that was from the Congress
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?

“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Married A Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

Married A Horn said:

Ive said it before, but when you are 36T in debt and run a deficit of 2T... stuff has to be cut or eventually its all cut.

2T is a lot of cuts man. I need to see you start making suggestings to get us in the black before I take you serious.
We are in this mess because they gave away trillions of dollars not to work. You are not getting in the black anytime soon being 33T in the hole. Cutting real capabilities is not a responsible way to do it. Obama, Trump and Biden really put us in a hole over the last 20 years. You are looking at 50 years to climb out of this mess, not having weather or aviation safety capabilities is not where cuts should be made.


I dont disagree. But when I mean in the black, I just mean the budget. I have yet to see you propose how we might do that... You just fight against every single cut they announce.

That could be done in one year.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:


Exactly! And let citizens volunteer to do the deed. That line will be loooooong
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

Are they booing DOGE?




According to the local paper there were about a dozen members of the Democratic Party there that were doing the booing and yelling from the crowd.
Married A Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

boognish_bear said:

Are they booing DOGE?




According to the local paper there were about a dozen members of the Democratic Party there that were doing the booing and yelling from the crowd.


Dont give a second's thought to that. Since I was a little kid my parents taught me the liberal ultra minority scream the loudest. They do not represent the silent majority or that district.

Ignore them completely. Surely republican leaders have wisened up to that crap.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fascists are now using extreme tactics to be as offensive and obnoxious as possible. It won't gain them anything because they still have nothing worth supporting & Trump is very popular.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Married A Horn said:

FLBear5630 said:

Married A Horn said:

Ive said it before, but when you are 36T in debt and run a deficit of 2T... stuff has to be cut or eventually its all cut.

2T is a lot of cuts man. I need to see you start making suggestings to get us in the black before I take you serious.
We are in this mess because they gave away trillions of dollars not to work. You are not getting in the black anytime soon being 33T in the hole. Cutting real capabilities is not a responsible way to do it. Obama, Trump and Biden really put us in a hole over the last 20 years. You are looking at 50 years to climb out of this mess, not having weather or aviation safety capabilities is not where cuts should be made.


I dont disagree. But when I mean in the black, I just mean the budget. I have yet to see you propose how we might do that... You just fight against every single cut they announce.

That could be done in one year.


There are many of DOGEs findings I agree, most are programs that hav lapsed or ended. Billions of dollars. No issues, the results of year over year budgeting. That is waste. I think a constitutional amendment requiring zero based budgeting once every ten years is needed. The USAID, I agree. Foreign aid to nations not supporting US interests. Too many social research programs. Too many academic boondoggles. There are numerous cuts I am good with happening.

FAA, NASA, NWC, Interior all provide either capabilities, safety or services. I want to preserve those. I want National Parks having fire MGT and pro rangers. I want more weather capabilities. FAA having more air traffic controllers and NTSB investigators. I want us to go to Mars and mine asteroids. Those areas should be funded.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

Married A Horn said:

Ive said it before, but when you are 36T in debt and run a deficit of 2T... stuff has to be cut or eventually its all cut.

2T is a lot of cuts man. I need to see you start making suggestings to get us in the black before I take you serious.
We are in this mess because they gave away trillions of dollars not to work. You are not getting in the black anytime soon being 33T in the hole. Cutting real capabilities is not a responsible way to do it. Obama, Trump and Biden really put us in a hole over the last 20 years. You are looking at 50 years to climb out of this mess, not having weather or aviation safety capabilities is not where cuts should be made.


I will bite. Why do you think cuts have been made in "safety?"

Which persons cut played a direct role in safety?

The simple fact is that you have no clue.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

FLBear5630 said:

Married A Horn said:

Ive said it before, but when you are 36T in debt and run a deficit of 2T... stuff has to be cut or eventually its all cut.

2T is a lot of cuts man. I need to see you start making suggestings to get us in the black before I take you serious.
We are in this mess because they gave away trillions of dollars not to work. You are not getting in the black anytime soon being 33T in the hole. Cutting real capabilities is not a responsible way to do it. Obama, Trump and Biden really put us in a hole over the last 20 years. You are looking at 50 years to climb out of this mess, not having weather or aviation safety capabilities is not where cuts should be made.


I will bite. Why do you think cuts have been made in "safety?"

Which persons cut played a direct role in safety?

The simple fact is that you have no clue.
The key fact here is that FLBear has yet to suggest even one specific cut to the budget he'd make.

FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

FLBear5630 said:

Married A Horn said:

Ive said it before, but when you are 36T in debt and run a deficit of 2T... stuff has to be cut or eventually its all cut.

2T is a lot of cuts man. I need to see you start making suggestings to get us in the black before I take you serious.
We are in this mess because they gave away trillions of dollars not to work. You are not getting in the black anytime soon being 33T in the hole. Cutting real capabilities is not a responsible way to do it. Obama, Trump and Biden really put us in a hole over the last 20 years. You are looking at 50 years to climb out of this mess, not having weather or aviation safety capabilities is not where cuts should be made.


I will bite. Why do you think cuts have been made in "safety?"

Which persons cut played a direct role in safety?

The simple fact is that you have no clue.
Let's start with NHTSA and Musk cutting the AV rule making.
Bureau of Land Mgt restrictions of spending, which impacts fire response
NOAA staff reductions, responsible for maritime, agriculture and other industries. Not just your ski trip.
FAA 300 maintenance mechanics, aeronautical information specialists, aviation safety assistants and management and program assistants.
FDA cuts

These are not USAID or Dept of Ed cuts. These are all line agencies with distinct missions that impact safety. Sorry, this is more than waste cutting

I'll put it very succinct, Tesla should not be making these decisions for NHTSA (3 of the firings involved 3 of the 7 people responsible for AVs) and SpaceX should not be making these decisions over the FAA. SpaceX has been in fights with the FAA over flight paths, now those people are gone... SpaceX wanted to have flights over populated areas, look it up. Musk is creating the environment HE wants, that is best for him, not you and I.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I never watched the show. Is this accurate!



Crazier things have been true.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?

“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?

“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?

“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

boognish_bear said:

Are they booing DOGE?




According to the local paper there were about a dozen members of the Democratic Party there that were doing the booing and yelling from the crowd.

I think everyone of these congressmen who actually get out in front of their constituents and do these townhalls should wear some type of ribbon or medal in congress... bcs mine hides behind closed doors and once every two years does a scripted telephone town hall
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

I never watched the show. Is this accurate!



Crazier things have been true.
I worked on a TV show with the gal on the left, Kelli Giddish
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?


“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:


No problem with this. Stryker's are perfect for this mission. Send the Cav back to the border, the more things change the more they stay the same...
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Married A Horn said:

FLBear5630 said:

Married A Horn said:

Ive said it before, but when you are 36T in debt and run a deficit of 2T... stuff has to be cut or eventually its all cut.

2T is a lot of cuts man. I need to see you start making suggestings to get us in the black before I take you serious.
We are in this mess because they gave away trillions of dollars not to work. You are not getting in the black anytime soon being 33T in the hole. Cutting real capabilities is not a responsible way to do it. Obama, Trump and Biden really put us in a hole over the last 20 years. You are looking at 50 years to climb out of this mess, not having weather or aviation safety capabilities is not where cuts should be made.


I dont disagree. But when I mean in the black, I just mean the budget. I have yet to see you propose how we might do that... You just fight against every single cut they announce.

That could be done in one year.
"cutting real capabilities is not a responsible way to go it...."

utterly wrong. That is exactly what we have to do.

USG will raise about $5T this year in revenues, and spend about $2T. The deficit is 40% the size of revenue. You cannot economize your way out of that kind of imbalance. You have to economize + do less of some things + none of other things + grow revenues by growing the economy +(some tariffs). One can debate the steps, but not the pathway. There is no other path to a balanced budget that will not include doing less, divesting of functions, operations, assets, and finding ways to raise revenues, etc.....

Not everything Govt does is essential, ya know.

I asked a doctor friend back when Obamacare was a hot issue - "how do we spend less on healthcare?"
His answer was immediate - "we have to do practice less medicine."
You cannot significantly cut spending without significantly cutting activity levels.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

GrowlTowel said:

FLBear5630 said:

Married A Horn said:

Ive said it before, but when you are 36T in debt and run a deficit of 2T... stuff has to be cut or eventually its all cut.

2T is a lot of cuts man. I need to see you start making suggestings to get us in the black before I take you serious.
We are in this mess because they gave away trillions of dollars not to work. You are not getting in the black anytime soon being 33T in the hole. Cutting real capabilities is not a responsible way to do it. Obama, Trump and Biden really put us in a hole over the last 20 years. You are looking at 50 years to climb out of this mess, not having weather or aviation safety capabilities is not where cuts should be made.


I will bite. Why do you think cuts have been made in "safety?"

Which persons cut played a direct role in safety?

The simple fact is that you have no clue.
Let's start with NHTSA and Musk cutting the AV rule making.
Bureau of Land Mgt restrictions of spending, which impacts fire response
NOAA staff reductions, responsible for maritime, agriculture and other industries. Not just your ski trip.
FAA 300 maintenance mechanics, aeronautical information specialists, aviation safety assistants and management and program assistants.
FDA cuts

These are not USAID or Dept of Ed cuts. These are all line agencies with distinct missions that impact safety. Sorry, this is more than waste cutting

I'll put it very succinct, Tesla should not be making these decisions for NHTSA (3 of the firings involved 3 of the 7 people responsible for AVs) and SpaceX should not be making these decisions over the FAA. SpaceX has been in fights with the FAA over flight paths, now those people are gone... SpaceX wanted to have flights over populated areas, look it up. Musk is creating the environment HE wants, that is best for him, not you and I.
or maybe not.

If you haven't seen government do truly stupid stuff, getting in the way of progress for no appreciable benefit whatsoever, then you haven't really lived much.

Get around more.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Married A Horn said:

FLBear5630 said:

Married A Horn said:

Ive said it before, but when you are 36T in debt and run a deficit of 2T... stuff has to be cut or eventually its all cut.

2T is a lot of cuts man. I need to see you start making suggestings to get us in the black before I take you serious.
We are in this mess because they gave away trillions of dollars not to work. You are not getting in the black anytime soon being 33T in the hole. Cutting real capabilities is not a responsible way to do it. Obama, Trump and Biden really put us in a hole over the last 20 years. You are looking at 50 years to climb out of this mess, not having weather or aviation safety capabilities is not where cuts should be made.


I dont disagree. But when I mean in the black, I just mean the budget. I have yet to see you propose how we might do that... You just fight against every single cut they announce.

That could be done in one year.
"cutting real capabilities is not a responsible way to go it...."

utterly wrong. That is exactly what we have to do.

USG will raise about $5T this year in revenues, and spend about $2T. The deficit is 40% the size of revenue. You cannot economize your way out of that kind of imbalance. You have to economize + do less of some things + none of other things + grow revenues by growing the economy +(some tariffs). One can debate the steps, but not the pathway. There is no other path to a balanced budget that will not include doing less, divesting of functions, operations, assets, and finding ways to raise revenues, etc.....

Not everything Govt does is essential, ya know.

I asked a doctor friend back when Obamacare was a hot issue - "how do we spend less on healthcare?"
His answer was immediate - "we have to do practice less medicine."
You cannot significantly cut spending without significantly cutting activity levels.

You do this. I am talking public safety in real physical terms, infrastructure, travel, weather for maritime/ag, food safety, and product safety standards. You come back with health care and other "programs".

No ****, health care has waste that needs to go. Just go to the doctor and try to figure out insurance. No ****, USAID is misused.

There are government services that the private sector do not want to do because it is not profitable. Weather is a perfect example, there is more to weather than WAZE and Weather Channel. My son works in maritime, they constantly are working with the NWS, USGS, Coast Guard and Private Sector. NWS, NOAA and USGS provide information that the private sector calibrate off. The Govt is not all waste. Just because Trump doesn't like it doesn't mean it needs to go.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Married A Horn said:

FLBear5630 said:

Married A Horn said:

Ive said it before, but when you are 36T in debt and run a deficit of 2T... stuff has to be cut or eventually its all cut.

2T is a lot of cuts man. I need to see you start making suggestings to get us in the black before I take you serious.
We are in this mess because they gave away trillions of dollars not to work. You are not getting in the black anytime soon being 33T in the hole. Cutting real capabilities is not a responsible way to do it. Obama, Trump and Biden really put us in a hole over the last 20 years. You are looking at 50 years to climb out of this mess, not having weather or aviation safety capabilities is not where cuts should be made.


I dont disagree. But when I mean in the black, I just mean the budget. I have yet to see you propose how we might do that... You just fight against every single cut they announce.

That could be done in one year.
"cutting real capabilities is not a responsible way to go it...."

utterly wrong. That is exactly what we have to do.

USG will raise about $5T this year in revenues, and spend about $2T. The deficit is 40% the size of revenue. You cannot economize your way out of that kind of imbalance. You have to economize + do less of some things + none of other things + grow revenues by growing the economy +(some tariffs). One can debate the steps, but not the pathway. There is no other path to a balanced budget that will not include doing less, divesting of functions, operations, assets, and finding ways to raise revenues, etc.....

Not everything Govt does is essential, ya know.

I asked a doctor friend back when Obamacare was a hot issue - "how do we spend less on healthcare?"
His answer was immediate - "we have to do practice less medicine."
You cannot significantly cut spending without significantly cutting activity levels.

easiest path to spend less on healthcare is to fix why people get sick. Remove subsidies from junk food, remove garbage from processed food, teach the kids and parents to think differently. The majority of health issues are cardio metabolic driven.

Also, get drug ads off TV and print. If aint OTC, it shouldnt be on TV
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

whiterock said:

Married A Horn said:

FLBear5630 said:

Married A Horn said:

Ive said it before, but when you are 36T in debt and run a deficit of 2T... stuff has to be cut or eventually its all cut.

2T is a lot of cuts man. I need to see you start making suggestings to get us in the black before I take you serious.
We are in this mess because they gave away trillions of dollars not to work. You are not getting in the black anytime soon being 33T in the hole. Cutting real capabilities is not a responsible way to do it. Obama, Trump and Biden really put us in a hole over the last 20 years. You are looking at 50 years to climb out of this mess, not having weather or aviation safety capabilities is not where cuts should be made.


I dont disagree. But when I mean in the black, I just mean the budget. I have yet to see you propose how we might do that... You just fight against every single cut they announce.

That could be done in one year.
"cutting real capabilities is not a responsible way to go it...."

utterly wrong. That is exactly what we have to do.

USG will raise about $5T this year in revenues, and spend about $2T. The deficit is 40% the size of revenue. You cannot economize your way out of that kind of imbalance. You have to economize + do less of some things + none of other things + grow revenues by growing the economy +(some tariffs). One can debate the steps, but not the pathway. There is no other path to a balanced budget that will not include doing less, divesting of functions, operations, assets, and finding ways to raise revenues, etc.....

Not everything Govt does is essential, ya know.

I asked a doctor friend back when Obamacare was a hot issue - "how do we spend less on healthcare?"
His answer was immediate - "we have to do practice less medicine."
You cannot significantly cut spending without significantly cutting activity levels.

easiest path to spend less on healthcare is to fix why people get sick. Remove subsidies from junk food, remove garbage from processed food, teach the kids and parents to think differently. The majority of health issues are cardio metabolic driven.

Also, get drug ads off TV and print. If aint OTC, it shouldnt be on TV
No argument here.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.