Trump's first 100 days

107,457 Views | 2776 Replies | Last: 33 min ago by Osodecentx
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

boognish_bear said:



It was that stupid women that Trump appointed that tanked it.... when will conservatives learn? Stop electing/appointing women to these critical positions that require a steel spine.

Women are better than men at a lot of things, but they are not fighters and they crumble under pressure.

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why is he backing off?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear said:

Why is he backing off?


A few weeks ago he backed off after he got some specific concessions. I'm not sure what the deal is here?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

boognish_bear said:




Wrong ruling based on jurisdiction. But correct -ish outcome since the pay was for work already performed (supposedly).

The right solution at a high level - is to stop the corrupt payment. The party where work was performed would sue in the correct jurisdiction and loosely prove they did the work/service. Then they would get paid.
pretty much
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

J.R. said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

FLBear5630 said:

The_barBEARian said:

william said:

FLBear5630 said:

william said:

meh - it's everyone's fault -

bush 43, soetoro, trump, dementia joe....

both houses of congress have dem and repube the past 25 years.

got corrupt and sloppy.

but - maybe we have some fiscal hope???

- el KKM

get back to zero based budgeting.






I think we need z-based every decade, time it with the census. Can't do every year, but every decade would be good. Should be required.
a little short term pain ain't gonna hurt nobody but the grifters.........

- KKM


They certainly have a lot more to lose than most of us do!

Unfortunately the foreign interest grifters or the grifters at the Pentagon wont be touched



Disagree, there are a lot of good middle class people that have invested their life serving their country hurt by this. My niece was laid off from IRS, she did nothing but graduate and do her job. She is 32 with 3 kids married to a Pastor. Not much grift there. Know several engineers with USDOT forced to resign. These are normal people. Not high level grifters making a killing or not working. Those engineers fought to make cars safer. That was their big crime. So, this chainsaw act is hurting normal people.

Just a little fact, it is not just new hires that have a probationary period. Any promotion required 6 month probationary period. We are losing alot of capabilities. But that is good, right. Elon says so.


Just so we're clear, the "act" is something nearly every business goes through.

Leaders frequently have to cut with a broad swath.

Anyone of us could be impacted directly or indirectly by cuts elsewhere. I'm sorry for the people involved, but it doesn't make it evil or wrong.

We are spending more than we take in, you can't micro-cut and hope to make a difference. Our government spending needs to be restructured and prioritized. That sucks for many, doesn't change that we need to do it.

And our benevolent government has done it to the private sector numerous times via legislation, acts and deals.

If u have a job which is doubtful.. I hope and ur ilk get indescribably fired with no due process.

You're just not smart. Due process, lol.

"indescribably" ... indubitably, lol



indescribablely was autocorrect. Indiscriminately ...yes, there is due process in firing people in corporations and govt. guess you have never had a mgt position, even at McDonalds if you don't know that, clown.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

J.R. said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:



Just so we're clear, the "act" is something nearly every business goes through.

Leaders frequently have to cut with a broad swath.

Anyone of us could be impacted directly or indirectly by cuts elsewhere. I'm sorry for the people involved, but it doesn't make it evil or wrong.

We are spending more than we take in, you can't micro-cut and hope to make a difference. Our government spending needs to be restructured and prioritized. That sucks for many, doesn't change that we need to do it.

And our benevolent government has done it to the private sector numerous times via legislation, acts and deals.
If u have a job which is doubtful.. I hope and ur ilk get indescribably fired with no due process.
You're just not smart. Due process, lol.

"indescribably" ... indubitably, lol
JR is just a little irritable these days.

He's always the first one eliminated in all the dick measuring contests...
thanks, captain pervert with no job feeding at the govt trough.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well .... There are invoices.

Actual results, not sure .
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Schumer can't help himself.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you REALLY want to tick off JR, it's rather easy as he is so insignificant...

Just block him. He can't stand being ignored

Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
TinFoilHatPreacherBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

J.R. said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

FLBear5630 said:

The_barBEARian said:

william said:

FLBear5630 said:

william said:

meh - it's everyone's fault -

bush 43, soetoro, trump, dementia joe....

both houses of congress have dem and repube the past 25 years.

got corrupt and sloppy.

but - maybe we have some fiscal hope???

- el KKM

get back to zero based budgeting.






I think we need z-based every decade, time it with the census. Can't do every year, but every decade would be good. Should be required.
a little short term pain ain't gonna hurt nobody but the grifters.........

- KKM


They certainly have a lot more to lose than most of us do!

Unfortunately the foreign interest grifters or the grifters at the Pentagon wont be touched



Disagree, there are a lot of good middle class people that have invested their life serving their country hurt by this. My niece was laid off from IRS, she did nothing but graduate and do her job. She is 32 with 3 kids married to a Pastor. Not much grift there. Know several engineers with USDOT forced to resign. These are normal people. Not high level grifters making a killing or not working. Those engineers fought to make cars safer. That was their big crime. So, this chainsaw act is hurting normal people.

Just a little fact, it is not just new hires that have a probationary period. Any promotion required 6 month probationary period. We are losing alot of capabilities. But that is good, right. Elon says so.


Just so we're clear, the "act" is something nearly every business goes through.

Leaders frequently have to cut with a broad swath.

Anyone of us could be impacted directly or indirectly by cuts elsewhere. I'm sorry for the people involved, but it doesn't make it evil or wrong.

We are spending more than we take in, you can't micro-cut and hope to make a difference. Our government spending needs to be restructured and prioritized. That sucks for many, doesn't change that we need to do it.

And our benevolent government has done it to the private sector numerous times via legislation, acts and deals.

If u have a job which is doubtful.. I hope and ur ilk get indescribably fired with no due process.

You're just not smart. Due process, lol.

"indescribably" ... indubitably, lol



indescribablely was autocorrect. Indiscriminately ...yes, there is due process in firing people in corporations and govt. guess you have never had a mgt position, even at McDonalds if you don't know that, clown.


Due process, lol
Thee tinfoil hat couch-potato prognosticator, not a bible school preacher.


boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:


Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The tax code didn't change. I'm not sure what would account for that.

ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:


RINO. Reagan In Name Only…
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
canoso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

Jacques Strap said:

CNN 69% favorable
CBS 76% favorable






Chuck may want to look at these polls about how Americans received the speech before he starts trying to dog pile on it


Keep up the fabulous work, Sen, Schumer...of finishing the demise of the Democrat party as a national political force.
canoso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:


Well, OK.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

J.R. said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

J.R. said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

FLBear5630 said:

The_barBEARian said:

william said:

FLBear5630 said:

william said:

meh - it's everyone's fault -

bush 43, soetoro, trump, dementia joe....

both houses of congress have dem and repube the past 25 years.

got corrupt and sloppy.

but - maybe we have some fiscal hope???

- el KKM

get back to zero based budgeting.






I think we need z-based every decade, time it with the census. Can't do every year, but every decade would be good. Should be required.
a little short term pain ain't gonna hurt nobody but the grifters.........

- KKM


They certainly have a lot more to lose than most of us do!

Unfortunately the foreign interest grifters or the grifters at the Pentagon wont be touched



Disagree, there are a lot of good middle class people that have invested their life serving their country hurt by this. My niece was laid off from IRS, she did nothing but graduate and do her job. She is 32 with 3 kids married to a Pastor. Not much grift there. Know several engineers with USDOT forced to resign. These are normal people. Not high level grifters making a killing or not working. Those engineers fought to make cars safer. That was their big crime. So, this chainsaw act is hurting normal people.

Just a little fact, it is not just new hires that have a probationary period. Any promotion required 6 month probationary period. We are losing alot of capabilities. But that is good, right. Elon says so.


Just so we're clear, the "act" is something nearly every business goes through.

Leaders frequently have to cut with a broad swath.

Anyone of us could be impacted directly or indirectly by cuts elsewhere. I'm sorry for the people involved, but it doesn't make it evil or wrong.

We are spending more than we take in, you can't micro-cut and hope to make a difference. Our government spending needs to be restructured and prioritized. That sucks for many, doesn't change that we need to do it.

And our benevolent government has done it to the private sector numerous times via legislation, acts and deals.

If u have a job which is doubtful.. I hope and ur ilk get indescribably fired with no due process.

You're just not smart. Due process, lol.

"indescribably" ... indubitably, lol



indescribablely was autocorrect. Indiscriminately ...yes, there is due process in firing people in corporations and govt. guess you have never had a mgt position, even at McDonalds if you don't know that, clown.


Due process, lol
what do you call it mr. seasoned business guy? You ever had management roles in any significant organization?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Did someone say Zelensky and nuclear war? I thought I heard someone say that. Something about World War III.
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

boognish_bear said:


RINO. Reagan In Name Only…


Reagan was not a demi-god

He was right about a lot

But he was dead wrong about amnesty for millions of 3rd worlders and was wrong about the de-industrialization of the USA

A USA without powerful manufacturing and production capabilities could never have defeated the communists in the USSR

And if America is going to defeat the communists in China it has to change course from the failed orthodoxies of the past few decades

Sending 50,000 factories and millions of jobs overseas does not in fact make us stronger
TinFoilHatPreacherBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

ATL Bear said:

boognish_bear said:


RINO. Reagan In Name Only…


Reagan was not a demi-god

He was right about a lot

But he was dead wrong about amnesty for millions of 3rd worlders and was wrong about the de-industrialization of the USA

A USA without powerful manufacturing and production capabilities could never have defeated the communists in the USSR

And if America is going to defeat the communists in China it has to change course from the failed orthodoxies of the past few decades

Sending 50,000 factories and millions of jobs overseas does not in fact make us stronger
Honestly, that was back when normal people thought "free trade" was actually going to be some semblance of free trade. It was a much different time. We know a bit more now and we have evidence of how it worked out for middle America. The new mantra should absolutely be fair free trade. When it's fair free trade, like minded economies can leverage each others economic strengths. If that's not possible, use tariffs as the bully stick.
Thee tinfoil hat couch-potato prognosticator, not a bible school preacher.


ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

ATL Bear said:

boognish_bear said:


RINO. Reagan In Name Only…


Reagan was not a demi-god

He was right about a lot

But he was dead wrong about amnesty for millions of 3rd worlders and was wrong about the de-industrialization of the USA

A USA without powerful manufacturing and production capabilities could never have defeated the communists in the USSR

And if America is going to defeat the communists in China it has to change course from the failed orthodoxies of the past few decades

Sending 50,000 factories and millions of jobs overseas does not in fact make us stronger
Just a question. Are we stronger today than we were when Reagan was President? Militarily? Economically? Is life a multitude easier than it was in 1986? Technology not outsourcing has been the killer of the manufacturing worker, and the driver of our innovation that has propelled us. It's in a constant pursuit of minimizing human necessity in repeatable process tasks, and as AI progresses it's going much more complex.

Where you and others are lost is what Reagan and others like Milton Friedman understood. Trade, even if on unequal terms, pushes companies to innovate around it. Where we failed was being unwilling to actually deregulate to the level necessary to compete. We continue to hang onto labor value perspectives that are becoming obsolescent. Our auto industry still languishes in these historical burdens. We don't need more metal press operators, we need engineers. That's where China, India, Europe and elsewhere beat our butts. And now we want to limit our labor supply shortage through Visa limits.

We've gone next level in complaining about our lot ( which is pretty damn good comparatively), but we have a long way to go in actually trying to make the necessary changes if we want to get back to the low ends of the supply chain. Take mining for example. We don't need to buy Greenland to get into rare earth minerals again. We just need the fortitude to change our laws. Are we ready? Words are cheap and easy, actions not so much.
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

Redbrickbear said:

ATL Bear said:

boognish_bear said:


RINO. Reagan In Name Only…


Reagan was not a demi-god

He was right about a lot

But he was dead wrong about amnesty for millions of 3rd worlders and was wrong about the de-industrialization of the USA

A USA without powerful manufacturing and production capabilities could never have defeated the communists in the USSR

And if America is going to defeat the communists in China it has to change course from the failed orthodoxies of the past few decades

Sending 50,000 factories and millions of jobs overseas does not in fact make us stronger
Honestly, that was back when normal people thought "free trade" was actually going to be some semblance of free trade. It was a much different time. We know a bit more now and we have evidence of how it worked out for middle America. The new mantra should absolutely be fair free trade. When it's fair free trade, like minded economies can leverage each others economic strengths. If that's not possible, use tariffs as the bully stick.
Just note that we were complaining about flat wages, declining middle class, and the loss of manufacturing back then. We even did direct company bailouts to help.
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Biden Official Who Trump Fired and Was Reinstated by an Obama Judge Has Been Fired Again RedState
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

ATL Bear said:

boognish_bear said:


RINO. Reagan In Name Only…


Reagan was not a demi-god

He was right about a lot

But he was dead wrong about amnesty for millions of 3rd worlders and was wrong about the de-industrialization of the USA

A USA without powerful manufacturing and production capabilities could never have defeated the communists in the USSR

And if America is going to defeat the communists in China it has to change course from the failed orthodoxies of the past few decades

Sending 50,000 factories and millions of jobs overseas does not in fact make us stronger
Just a question. Are we stronger today than we were when Reagan was President? Militarily? Economically? Is life a multitude easier than it was in 1986? Technology not outsourcing has been the killer of the manufacturing worker, and the driver of our innovation that has propelled us. It's in a constant pursuit of minimizing human necessity in repeatable process tasks, and as AI progresses it's going much more complex.

Where you and others are lost is what Reagan and others like Milton Friedman understood. Trade, even if on unequal terms, pushes companies to innovate around it. Where we failed was being unwilling to actually deregulate to the level necessary to compete. We continue to hang onto labor value perspectives that are becoming obsolescent. Our auto industry still languishes in these historical burdens. We don't need more metal press operators, we need engineers. That's where China, India, Europe and elsewhere beat our butts. And now we want to limit our labor supply shortage through Visa limits.

We've gone next level in complaining about our lot ( which is pretty damn good comparatively), but we have a long way to go in actually trying to make the necessary changes if we want to get back to the low ends of the supply chain. Take mining for example. We don't need to buy Greenland to get into rare earth minerals again. We just need the fortitude to change our laws. Are we ready? Words are cheap and easy, actions not so much.
faulty premise there in the first paragraph.

Technology did not create the Rust Belt. Post-WWII US trade policy did. Textbook.

What we're seeing now is the dying of Post-WWII order. Finally. It worked splendidly. It was correct policy, well implemented, and it delivered victory in the Cold War. But it no longer serves the common good. So it's going away.
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Test case.

If you take over a building and force other students who want to study in the library to leave, is that illegal?


 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.