The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

Mothra said:

---

That opinion is no surprise - coming from someone who isn't a Christian and doesn't know what an actual Christian is.

Supporting an evil, despotic and demonic Islamic regime that kills and subjugates its own people and is responsible for numerous deaths throughout the Middle East and around the world is not Christian. It's quite the opposite. Sorry.

You're lost.

---

Questioning the wisdom of a war does not equate with supporting the opposing regime.

Questioning the foreign/domestic policy of a nation state or the theology of a different religion does not constitute racism.

Unfortunately you regularly fall into both intellectual tiger pits.

Believe it or not, it is quite rational to oppose both the Obama strategy towards Iran and the Netanyahu/Trump strategy towards Iran.

---

Unfortunately, you've once again interjected yourself into a conversation and lack the context to understand what I was referencing.

I never said or suggested any of the things you mentioned. So all you've done is erected a number of strawmen, as you so often do. I don't disagree with any of the points raised in your post.

Sam knows what I was referencing and it is specific to him - his beliefs. And those beliefs go back 20 plus years.

---

Not really. You're referencing nationalist propaganda, as usual.

---

Anyone who's read your posts over the years knows 2 things: 1) you think your country is evil; and 2) always side with the dictators and despots.

It's your thing…

---

Sam does not believe our country is evil & doesn't always side with dictators

You're a smart guy

---

Respectfully, he absolutely does, and has a long history on this board proving as such, whether it's the Iranian Mullahs, the Russians, the Iraqis, pre-WWII Japan, pre-WWII Germany, etc. I mean, here is a guy who claims the last just military conduct America was engaged in was the War of 1812. He absolutely believes we are evil.

You might want to ask him, or do a little research. I am sure it is a tough pill for you to swallow.

---

Silly post

---

So, you're cool with the opinion that every American War since the War of 1812 was unjust and immoral? You're cool with defending the Japanese attack of Pearl Harbor?

If so, it sounds like we aren't going to find much agreement on anything. I think that's a pretty reprehensible position. I think most reasonable Americans would as well.

---

Sam does not believe our country is evil & doesn't always side with dictators

---

We definitely disagree on that and I think the overwhelming weight of evidence supports my position. However, the last part of your sentence is particularly interesting. You said: Sam doesn't always side with dictators. It suggests that you understand he often times does, certainly if that dictator is opposed to America.

Is it troubling to you that Sam believes that Japan was justified in attacking Pearl Harbor? Is it troubling that the last American military action he thought was just and moral was the war of 1812? Is it likewise troubling that despite this fact, he believes that Russia's aggression against Ukraine is morally just?

I would think those positions would give even a poster who thinks as much of Sam as you do serious pause.

---

I can disagree with Sam without making judgments on his support of dictators & despots, or his Christian walk

---

Interesting. So you're not willing to make a judgment call on whether it's wrong to support dictators and despots? You're not willing to be critical of calling Putin's aggression in Ukraine morally just?

I guess I shouldn't be surprised. It sometimes hard to stand up for what's right and call out evil behavior, especially among friends. I'll be praying you develop some courage and much better discernment.

---

Selective outrage.

Israel is about to annex all of southern Lebanon... I doubt i'll see one post from you calling out Netanyahu's aggression in Lebanon as morally unjust.

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

Mothra said:

---

That opinion is no surprise - coming from someone who isn't a Christian and doesn't know what an actual Christian is.

Supporting an evil, despotic and demonic Islamic regime that kills and subjugates its own people and is responsible for numerous deaths throughout the Middle East and around the world is not Christian. It's quite the opposite. Sorry.

You're lost.

---

Questioning the wisdom of a war does not equate with supporting the opposing regime.

Questioning the foreign/domestic policy of a nation state or the theology of a different religion does not constitute racism.

Unfortunately you regularly fall into both intellectual tiger pits.

Believe it or not, it is quite rational to oppose both the Obama strategy towards Iran and the Netanyahu/Trump strategy towards Iran.

---

Unfortunately, you've once again interjected yourself into a conversation and lack the context to understand what I was referencing.

I never said or suggested any of the things you mentioned. So all you've done is erected a number of strawmen, as you so often do. I don't disagree with any of the points raised in your post.

Sam knows what I was referencing and it is specific to him - his beliefs. And those beliefs go back 20 plus years.

---

Not really. You're referencing nationalist propaganda, as usual.

---

Anyone who's read your posts over the years knows 2 things: 1) you think your country is evil; and 2) always side with the dictators and despots.

It's your thing…

---

Sam does not believe our country is evil & doesn't always side with dictators

You're a smart guy

---

Respectfully, he absolutely does, and has a long history on this board proving as such, whether it's the Iranian Mullahs, the Russians, the Iraqis, pre-WWII Japan, pre-WWII Germany, etc. I mean, here is a guy who claims the last just military conduct America was engaged in was the War of 1812. He absolutely believes we are evil.

You might want to ask him, or do a little research. I am sure it is a tough pill for you to swallow.

---

Silly post

---

So, you're cool with the opinion that every American War since the War of 1812 was unjust and immoral? You're cool with defending the Japanese attack of Pearl Harbor?

If so, it sounds like we aren't going to find much agreement on anything. I think that's a pretty reprehensible position. I think most reasonable Americans would as well.

---

Sam does not believe our country is evil & doesn't always side with dictators

---

We definitely disagree on that and I think the overwhelming weight of evidence supports my position. However, the last part of your sentence is particularly interesting. You said: Sam doesn't always side with dictators. It suggests that you understand he often times does, certainly if that dictator is opposed to America.

Is it troubling to you that Sam believes that Japan was justified in attacking Pearl Harbor? Is it troubling that the last American military action he thought was just and moral was the war of 1812? Is it likewise troubling that despite this fact, he believes that Russia's aggression against Ukraine is morally just?

I would think those positions would give even a poster who thinks as much of Sam as you do serious pause.

---

I can disagree with Sam without making judgments on his support of dictators & despots, or his Christian walk

---

Interesting. So you're not willing to make a judgment call on whether it's wrong to support dictators and despots? You're not willing to be critical of calling Putin's aggression in Ukraine morally just?

I guess I shouldn't be surprised. It sometimes hard to stand up for what's right and call out evil behavior, especially among friends. I'll be praying you develop some courage and much better discernment.

---

Selective outrage.

Israel is about to annex all of southern Lebanon... I doubt i'll see one post from you calling out Netanyahu's aggression in Lebanon as morally unjust.

---

Israel announces its stealing half the land from another country so it can continue to slaughter Middle Eastern Christians and destroy their churches with impunity on behalf of Greater Israel. https://t.co/dmGOjNc5ss

— Radix Verum ☦︎ (@NotRadix) March 16, 2026

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

Mothra said:

---

That opinion is no surprise - coming from someone who isn't a Christian and doesn't know what an actual Christian is.

Supporting an evil, despotic and demonic Islamic regime that kills and subjugates its own people and is responsible for numerous deaths throughout the Middle East and around the world is not Christian. It's quite the opposite. Sorry.

You're lost.

---

Questioning the wisdom of a war does not equate with supporting the opposing regime.

Questioning the foreign/domestic policy of a nation state or the theology of a different religion does not constitute racism.

Unfortunately you regularly fall into both intellectual tiger pits.

Believe it or not, it is quite rational to oppose both the Obama strategy towards Iran and the Netanyahu/Trump strategy towards Iran.

---

Unfortunately, you've once again interjected yourself into a conversation and lack the context to understand what I was referencing.

I never said or suggested any of the things you mentioned. So all you've done is erected a number of strawmen, as you so often do. I don't disagree with any of the points raised in your post.

Sam knows what I was referencing and it is specific to him - his beliefs. And those beliefs go back 20 plus years.

---

Not really. You're referencing nationalist propaganda, as usual.

---

Anyone who's read your posts over the years knows 2 things: 1) you think your country is evil; and 2) always side with the dictators and despots.

It's your thing…

---

Sam does not believe our country is evil & doesn't always side with dictators

You're a smart guy

---

Respectfully, he absolutely does, and has a long history on this board proving as such, whether it's the Iranian Mullahs, the Russians, the Iraqis, pre-WWII Japan, pre-WWII Germany, etc. I mean, here is a guy who claims the last just military conduct America was engaged in was the War of 1812. He absolutely believes we are evil.

You might want to ask him, or do a little research. I am sure it is a tough pill for you to swallow.

---

Silly post

---

So, you're cool with the opinion that every American War since the War of 1812 was unjust and immoral? You're cool with defending the Japanese attack of Pearl Harbor?

If so, it sounds like we aren't going to find much agreement on anything. I think that's a pretty reprehensible position. I think most reasonable Americans would as well.

---

Sam does not believe our country is evil & doesn't always side with dictators

---

We definitely disagree on that and I think the overwhelming weight of evidence supports my position. However, the last part of your sentence is particularly interesting. You said: Sam doesn't always side with dictators. It suggests that you understand he often times does, certainly if that dictator is opposed to America.

Is it troubling to you that Sam believes that Japan was justified in attacking Pearl Harbor? Is it troubling that the last American military action he thought was just and moral was the war of 1812? Is it likewise troubling that despite this fact, he believes that Russia's aggression against Ukraine is morally just?

I would think those positions would give even a poster who thinks as much of Sam as you do serious pause.

---

I can disagree with Sam without making judgments on his support of dictators & despots, or his Christian walk

---

Interesting. So you're not willing to make a judgment call on whether it's wrong to support dictators and despots? You're not willing to be critical of calling Putin's aggression in Ukraine morally just?

I guess I shouldn't be surprised. It sometimes hard to stand up for what's right and call out evil behavior, especially among friends. I'll be praying you develop some courage and much better discernment.

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

Mothra said:

---

That opinion is no surprise - coming from someone who isn't a Christian and doesn't know what an actual Christian is.

Supporting an evil, despotic and demonic Islamic regime that kills and subjugates its own people and is responsible for numerous deaths throughout the Middle East and around the world is not Christian. It's quite the opposite. Sorry.

You're lost.

---

Questioning the wisdom of a war does not equate with supporting the opposing regime.

Questioning the foreign/domestic policy of a nation state or the theology of a different religion does not constitute racism.

Unfortunately you regularly fall into both intellectual tiger pits.

Believe it or not, it is quite rational to oppose both the Obama strategy towards Iran and the Netanyahu/Trump strategy towards Iran.

---

Unfortunately, you've once again interjected yourself into a conversation and lack the context to understand what I was referencing.

I never said or suggested any of the things you mentioned. So all you've done is erected a number of strawmen, as you so often do. I don't disagree with any of the points raised in your post.

Sam knows what I was referencing and it is specific to him - his beliefs. And those beliefs go back 20 plus years.

---

Not really. You're referencing nationalist propaganda, as usual.

---

Anyone who's read your posts over the years knows 2 things: 1) you think your country is evil; and 2) always side with the dictators and despots.

It's your thing…

---

Sam does not believe our country is evil & doesn't always side with dictators

You're a smart guy

---

Respectfully, he absolutely does, and has a long history on this board proving as such, whether it's the Iranian Mullahs, the Russians, the Iraqis, pre-WWII Japan, pre-WWII Germany, etc. I mean, here is a guy who claims the last just military conduct America was engaged in was the War of 1812. He absolutely believes we are evil.

You might want to ask him, or do a little research. I am sure it is a tough pill for you to swallow.

---

Silly post

---

So, you're cool with the opinion that every American War since the War of 1812 was unjust and immoral? You're cool with defending the Japanese attack of Pearl Harbor?

If so, it sounds like we aren't going to find much agreement on anything. I think that's a pretty reprehensible position. I think most reasonable Americans would as well.

---

Sam does not believe our country is evil & doesn't always side with dictators

---

We definitely disagree on that and I think the overwhelming weight of evidence supports my position. However, the last part of your sentence is particularly interesting. You said: Sam doesn't always side with dictators. It suggests that you understand he often times does, certainly if that dictator is opposed to America.

Is it troubling to you that Sam believes that Japan was justified in attacking Pearl Harbor? Is it troubling that the last American military action he thought was just and moral was the war of 1812? Is it likewise troubling that despite this fact, he believes that Russia's aggression against Ukraine is morally just?

I would think those positions would give even a poster who thinks as much of Sam as you do serious pause.

---

I can disagree with Sam without making judgments on his support of dictators & despots, or his Christian walk

---

Interesting. So you're not willing to make a judgment call on whether it's wrong to support dictators and despots? You're not willing to be critical of calling Putin's aggression in Ukraine morally just?

I guess I shouldn't be surprised. It sometimes hard to stand up for what's right and call out evil behavior, especially among friends. I'll be praying you develop some courage and much better discernment.

---

Selective outrage.

Israel is about to annex all of southern Lebanon... I doubt i'll see one post from you calling out Netanyahu's aggression in Lebanon as morally unjust.

---

One of a nearly endless list of hypocrisies.

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

Mothra said:

---

That opinion is no surprise - coming from someone who isn't a Christian and doesn't know what an actual Christian is.

Supporting an evil, despotic and demonic Islamic regime that kills and subjugates its own people and is responsible for numerous deaths throughout the Middle East and around the world is not Christian. It's quite the opposite. Sorry.

You're lost.

---

Questioning the wisdom of a war does not equate with supporting the opposing regime.

Questioning the foreign/domestic policy of a nation state or the theology of a different religion does not constitute racism.

Unfortunately you regularly fall into both intellectual tiger pits.

Believe it or not, it is quite rational to oppose both the Obama strategy towards Iran and the Netanyahu/Trump strategy towards Iran.

---

Unfortunately, you've once again interjected yourself into a conversation and lack the context to understand what I was referencing.

I never said or suggested any of the things you mentioned. So all you've done is erected a number of strawmen, as you so often do. I don't disagree with any of the points raised in your post.

Sam knows what I was referencing and it is specific to him - his beliefs. And those beliefs go back 20 plus years.

---

Not really. You're referencing nationalist propaganda, as usual.

---

Anyone who's read your posts over the years knows 2 things: 1) you think your country is evil; and 2) always side with the dictators and despots.

It's your thing…

---

Sam does not believe our country is evil & doesn't always side with dictators

You're a smart guy

---

Respectfully, he absolutely does, and has a long history on this board proving as such, whether it's the Iranian Mullahs, the Russians, the Iraqis, pre-WWII Japan, pre-WWII Germany, etc. I mean, here is a guy who claims the last just military conduct America was engaged in was the War of 1812. He absolutely believes we are evil.

You might want to ask him, or do a little research. I am sure it is a tough pill for you to swallow.

---

Silly post

---

So, you're cool with the opinion that every American War since the War of 1812 was unjust and immoral? You're cool with defending the Japanese attack of Pearl Harbor?

If so, it sounds like we aren't going to find much agreement on anything. I think that's a pretty reprehensible position. I think most reasonable Americans would as well.

---

Sam does not believe our country is evil & doesn't always side with dictators

---

We definitely disagree on that and I think the overwhelming weight of evidence supports my position. However, the last part of your sentence is particularly interesting. You said: Sam doesn't always side with dictators. It suggests that you understand he often times does, certainly if that dictator is opposed to America.

Is it troubling to you that Sam believes that Japan was justified in attacking Pearl Harbor? Is it troubling that the last American military action he thought was just and moral was the war of 1812? Is it likewise troubling that despite this fact, he believes that Russia's aggression against Ukraine is morally just?

I would think those positions would give even a poster who thinks as much of Sam as you do serious pause.

---

I can disagree with Sam without making judgments on his support of dictators & despots, or his Christian walk

---

Interesting. So you're not willing to make a judgment call on whether it's wrong to support dictators and despots? You're not willing to be critical of calling Putin's aggression in Ukraine morally just?

I guess I shouldn't be surprised. It sometimes hard to stand up for what's right and call out evil behavior, especially among friends. I'll be praying you develop some courage and much better discernment.

---

Thanks

---

⚡️ Following their invasion of Lebanese civilian homes in border towns, Israeli forces are being seen documenting the destruction of the contents of the homes while mocking an elderly woman. pic.twitter.com/4L6Q5moEG6

— War Monitor (@WarMonitors) March 17, 2026

From Haaretz in Israel.

A description of an IDF commander murdering a 4 year old. For fun.

It's beyond demonic.https://t.co/MNVE5487j5 pic.twitter.com/GXDLWHtFVa

— Daniel Lambert (@dlLambo) March 17, 2026

Sam Lowry said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

Mothra said:

---

That opinion is no surprise - coming from someone who isn't a Christian and doesn't know what an actual Christian is.

Supporting an evil, despotic and demonic Islamic regime that kills and subjugates its own people and is responsible for numerous deaths throughout the Middle East and around the world is not Christian. It's quite the opposite. Sorry.

You're lost.

---

Questioning the wisdom of a war does not equate with supporting the opposing regime.

Questioning the foreign/domestic policy of a nation state or the theology of a different religion does not constitute racism.

Unfortunately you regularly fall into both intellectual tiger pits.

Believe it or not, it is quite rational to oppose both the Obama strategy towards Iran and the Netanyahu/Trump strategy towards Iran.

---

Unfortunately, you've once again interjected yourself into a conversation and lack the context to understand what I was referencing.

I never said or suggested any of the things you mentioned. So all you've done is erected a number of strawmen, as you so often do. I don't disagree with any of the points raised in your post.

Sam knows what I was referencing and it is specific to him - his beliefs. And those beliefs go back 20 plus years.

---

Not really. You're referencing nationalist propaganda, as usual.

---

Anyone who's read your posts over the years knows 2 things: 1) you think your country is evil; and 2) always side with the dictators and despots.

It's your thing…

---

Sam does not believe our country is evil & doesn't always side with dictators

You're a smart guy

---

Respectfully, he absolutely does, and has a long history on this board proving as such, whether it's the Iranian Mullahs, the Russians, the Iraqis, pre-WWII Japan, pre-WWII Germany, etc. I mean, here is a guy who claims the last just military conduct America was engaged in was the War of 1812. He absolutely believes we are evil.

You might want to ask him, or do a little research. I am sure it is a tough pill for you to swallow.

---

Silly post

---

So, you're cool with the opinion that every American War since the War of 1812 was unjust and immoral? You're cool with defending the Japanese attack of Pearl Harbor?

If so, it sounds like we aren't going to find much agreement on anything. I think that's a pretty reprehensible position. I think most reasonable Americans would as well.

---

Sam does not believe our country is evil & doesn't always side with dictators

---

We definitely disagree on that and I think the overwhelming weight of evidence supports my position. However, the last part of your sentence is particularly interesting. You said: Sam doesn't always side with dictators. It suggests that you understand he often times does, certainly if that dictator is opposed to America.

Is it troubling to you that Sam believes that Japan was justified in attacking Pearl Harbor? Is it troubling that the last American military action he thought was just and moral was the war of 1812? Is it likewise troubling that despite this fact, he believes that Russia's aggression against Ukraine is morally just?

I would think those positions would give even a poster who thinks as much of Sam as you do serious pause.

---

I can disagree with Sam without making judgments on his support of dictators & despots, or his Christian walk

---

Thanks.

Mothra's a troll. I'm done arguing with the guy.

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Is 'Haaretz' on the same level as The View?

I don't follow nutball media.

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Accidental comedy from Sam, pretending his screeds are 'argument'.

Point to Mothra.

---

Mothra said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Accidental comedy from Sam, pretending his screeds are 'argument'.

Point to Mothra.

---

Sam hates it when you bring up his past positions.

I suppose I'd be embarrassed as well, given some of his absurd positions over the years.

---

Mothra said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Is 'Haaretz' on the same level as The View?

I don't follow nutball media.

---

I think he believes pointing out instances of bad conduct somehow makes his generalizations and stereotypes true.

---

whiterock said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Accidental comedy from Sam, pretending his screeds are 'argument'.

Point to Mothra.

---

Sam hates it when you bring up his past positions.

I suppose I'd be embarrassed as well, given some of his absurd positions over the years.

---

he doesn't believe most of what he posts. He's just trolling.

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Is 'Haaretz' on the same level as The View?

I don't follow nutball media.

---

I think he believes pointing out instances of bad conduct somehow makes his generalizations and stereotypes true.

---

How many "instances" do you need before it becomes a pattern of behavior?

100? 1000? 10000? 1000000?

I have provided more specific examples of terrorism by the IDF than you did of the Iranians.

Your justification for the Iran war was entirely based on generalizations and vague innuendo.

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Is 'Haaretz' on the same level as The View?

I don't follow nutball media.

---

I think he believes pointing out instances of bad conduct somehow makes his generalizations and stereotypes true.

---

How many "instances" do you need before it becomes a pattern of behavior?

100? 1000? 10000? 1000000?

I have provided more specific examples of terrorism by the IDF than you did of the Iranians.

Your justification for the Iran war was entirely based on generalizations and vague innuendo.

---

No, you haven't. You post a handful of instances of bad conduct, and then try to generalize an entire group is bad or evil.

Should all white males be painted by the actions of a few white males? School shooters, for instance, are by and large white males. Does that mean all white males are evil? Of course not.

It's ridiculous and juvenile reasoning that, quite frankly, you should have grown out of long ago.

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Is 'Haaretz' on the same level as The View?

I don't follow nutball media.

---

I think he believes pointing out instances of bad conduct somehow makes his generalizations and stereotypes true.

---

How many "instances" do you need before it becomes a pattern of behavior?

100? 1000? 10000? 1000000?

I have provided more specific examples of terrorism by the IDF than you did of the Iranians.

Your justification for the Iran war was entirely based on generalizations and vague innuendo.

---

No, you haven't. You post a handful of instances of bad conduct, and then try to generalize an entire group is bad or evil.

Should all white males be painted by the actions of a few white males? School shooters, for instance, are by and large white males. Does that mean all white males are evil? Of course not.

It's ridiculous and juvenile reasoning that, quite frankly, you should have grown out of long ago.

---

How about you do you own research instead of falling back on your own ignorance as a defense.

If the IDF were "the most moral army" the majority of Americans would still support Israel.

---

Realitybites said:

---

Deir Mimas, the Christian village in Southern Lebanon between two fires

"Father Toufic Bou Mehri , superior of the Franciscan convent of Tyre , tells SIR the story of this Lebanese village . A strong bond keeps the friar of the Custody united in Deir Mimas where every Sunday he travels by car from Tyre, 30 kilometers away, despite rockets and bombs, to celebrate Holy Mass with the few remaining faithful and to deliver fresh fruit and vegetables to those in greatest difficulty. But we also assist, with my brother Father Pierre, those who have taken refuge in Beirut because of the war."

"Those" who were able to leave these areas went to Beirut," explains Father Toufic, "so the poorest and most vulnerable remained here. For a few weeks now, however, we have been witnessing the return of some families who are no longer able to support themselves financially in the Lebanese capital. This is a significant decision: choosing to die with dignity in the village where you were born and not die of hunger elsewhere." With the war, another problem has now been added to the village. Some local sources who wish to remain anonymous explained it to SIR: "Here in Deir Mimas we live off agriculture and olive groves, and oil. In 2023, the village was awarded the prize for best oil producer in Lebanon."

"This year we will have a lot of difficulty selling our olives and our oil because it seems that Israel has also launched phosphorus bombs."

Pray for their safety.

---

J.R. said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

Deir Mimas, the Christian village in Southern Lebanon between two fires

"Father Toufic Bou Mehri , superior of the Franciscan convent of Tyre , tells SIR the story of this Lebanese village . A strong bond keeps the friar of the Custody united in Deir Mimas where every Sunday he travels by car from Tyre, 30 kilometers away, despite rockets and bombs, to celebrate Holy Mass with the few remaining faithful and to deliver fresh fruit and vegetables to those in greatest difficulty. But we also assist, with my brother Father Pierre, those who have taken refuge in Beirut because of the war."

"Those" who were able to leave these areas went to Beirut," explains Father Toufic, "so the poorest and most vulnerable remained here. For a few weeks now, however, we have been witnessing the return of some families who are no longer able to support themselves financially in the Lebanese capital. This is a significant decision: choosing to die with dignity in the village where you were born and not die of hunger elsewhere." With the war, another problem has now been added to the village. Some local sources who wish to remain anonymous explained it to SIR: "Here in Deir Mimas we live off agriculture and olive groves, and oil. In 2023, the village was awarded the prize for best oil producer in Lebanon."

"This year we will have a lot of difficulty selling our olives and our oil because it seems that Israel has also launched phosphorus bombs."

Pray for their safety.

---

I have many friends Lebanon. unfortunately, they have been through this before. Lebanon is an amazing culture sans the Muslims who have infiltrated a wonderful land. Eff you, Piggy, Eff you Izzy.

---

muddybrazos said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Is 'Haaretz' on the same level as The View?

I don't follow nutball media.

---

I think he believes pointing out instances of bad conduct somehow makes his generalizations and stereotypes true.

---

How many "instances" do you need before it becomes a pattern of behavior?

100? 1000? 10000? 1000000?

I have provided more specific examples of terrorism by the IDF than you did of the Iranians.

Your justification for the Iran war was entirely based on generalizations and vague innuendo.

---

No, you haven't. You post a handful of instances of bad conduct, and then try to generalize an entire group is bad or evil.

Should all white males be painted by the actions of a few white males? School shooters, for instance, are by and large white males. Does that mean all white males are evil? Of course not.

It's ridiculous and juvenile reasoning that, quite frankly, you should have grown out of long ago.

---

Lets do a deep dive on that and use some per capita there too. When you say school shooters do you mean any shooting near a school? I think you may be surprised to know that black people also do a lot of shooting near schools. On a per capita basis lately it seems that trans people are overwhelmingly leading in the school shooting category.

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Is 'Haaretz' on the same level as The View?

I don't follow nutball media.

---

I think he believes pointing out instances of bad conduct somehow makes his generalizations and stereotypes true.

---

How many "instances" do you need before it becomes a pattern of behavior?

100? 1000? 10000? 1000000?

I have provided more specific examples of terrorism by the IDF than you did of the Iranians.

Your justification for the Iran war was entirely based on generalizations and vague innuendo.

---

No, you haven't. You post a handful of instances of bad conduct, and then try to generalize an entire group is bad or evil.

Should all white males be painted by the actions of a few white males? School shooters, for instance, are by and large white males. Does that mean all white males are evil? Of course not.

It's ridiculous and juvenile reasoning that, quite frankly, you should have grown out of long ago.

---

How about you do you own research instead of falling back on your own ignorance as a defense.

If the IDF were "the most moral army" the majority of Americans would still support Israel.

---

California GOP is instituting a "vetting process" on candidates to block the influence of Nick Fuentes within the party. The memo was sent to all 58 CA counties.

They said there was an "organized effort" from Groypers to infiltrate the party and take over from within 😈 pic.twitter.com/e4aItirhGr

— TGE (@TGETGETGETGE) March 17, 2026

muddybrazos said:

---

Mothra said:

---

muddybrazos said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Is 'Haaretz' on the same level as The View?

I don't follow nutball media.

---

I think he believes pointing out instances of bad conduct somehow makes his generalizations and stereotypes true.

---

How many "instances" do you need before it becomes a pattern of behavior?

100? 1000? 10000? 1000000?

I have provided more specific examples of terrorism by the IDF than you did of the Iranians.

Your justification for the Iran war was entirely based on generalizations and vague innuendo.

---

No, you haven't. You post a handful of instances of bad conduct, and then try to generalize an entire group is bad or evil.

Should all white males be painted by the actions of a few white males? School shooters, for instance, are by and large white males. Does that mean all white males are evil? Of course not.

It's ridiculous and juvenile reasoning that, quite frankly, you should have grown out of long ago.

---

Lets do a deep dive on that and use some per capita there too. When you say school shooters do you mean any shooting near a school? I think you may be surprised to know that black people also do a lot of shooting near schools. On a per capita basis lately it seems that trans people are overwhelmingly leading in the school shooting category.

---

I mean school shooters, like I said. You really don't know what that term means?

Those are the white dudes who walk into schools and shoot them up.

By and large white males. Should we generalize referring white males because we compromise the vast majority of school shooters?

---

So only white dudes do that? I can think of 3 black kids off the top of my head in DFW that have done that. 1 in Arlingtron and 2 at the same school in Wilmer Hucthins.

---

boognish_bear said:

---

California GOP is instituting a "vetting process" on candidates to block the influence of Nick Fuentes within the party. The memo was sent to all 58 CA counties.

They said there was an "organized effort" from Groypers to infiltrate the party and take over from within 😈 pic.twitter.com/e4aItirhGr

— TGE (@TGETGETGETGE) March 17, 2026

---

Realitybites said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

California GOP is instituting a "vetting process" on candidates to block the influence of Nick Fuentes within the party. The memo was sent to all 58 CA counties.

They said there was an "organized effort" from Groypers to infiltrate the party and take over from within 😈 pic.twitter.com/e4aItirhGr

— TGE (@TGETGETGETGE) March 17, 2026

---

California GOP. Funny.

---

J.R. said:

---

I know nothing about this dude other than what I saw on tv last night. My question is how can a "beaner" be a white nationalist? Should't he identify as Brown Christian Nazis

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Is 'Haaretz' on the same level as The View?

I don't follow nutball media.

---

I think he believes pointing out instances of bad conduct somehow makes his generalizations and stereotypes true.

---

How many "instances" do you need before it becomes a pattern of behavior?

100? 1000? 10000? 1000000?

I have provided more specific examples of terrorism by the IDF than you did of the Iranians.

Your justification for the Iran war was entirely based on generalizations and vague innuendo.

---

No, you haven't. You post a handful of instances of bad conduct, and then try to generalize an entire group is bad or evil.

Should all white males be painted by the actions of a few white males? School shooters, for instance, are by and large white males. Does that mean all white males are evil? Of course not.

It's ridiculous and juvenile reasoning that, quite frankly, you should have grown out of long ago.

---

How about you do you own research instead of falling back on your own ignorance as a defense.

If the IDF were "the most moral army" the majority of Americans would still support Israel.

---

Already have and don't need to do more. You make bull **** arguments and have a middle school level reasoning capability.

---

Settlers reportedly tied up his arms and legs, cut off his underwear, zip-tied his penis, then paraded him around his family while beating him. Corroborated by multiple witnesses. https://t.co/mINBJkqiGR pic.twitter.com/HJoL9YdL3R

— jasper nathaniel (@infinite_jaz) March 19, 2026

Imagine this.

You’re a Palestinian child in a school, just trying to play and feel safe.

Then they appear:

Israeli settlers, charging in like animals, screaming and terrorizing everyone.

This is satanic behavior. pic.twitter.com/2jyseMRXfh

— Parody Jeff (@Parodyjeffx) March 18, 2026