Unless it's the FBI going after Trump or protecting Hillary. Then it's 'wait for the investigation to complete'quash said:Things you hate: rule of law, free speech, freedom of contract, the right to carry in your marijuana patch, stuff like that.Florda_mike said:quash said:You and the boys have pushed the boundary for conservative into the weeds.Florda_mike said:
Quash ..... wrong on both counts!
Huh boys?
Fair enough
And tell us, what are you pushing???
Thanks. So talking about the 25th amendment isnt against the law but does count as a coup. Thanks for the clarification.GrowlTowel said:Does discussing the 25th or discussing impeachment count as a coup these days?Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:GrowlTowel said:Never said discussing it was against the law. Carry on.Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
Thanks GT. I like to learn something new everyday. Who would have thought discussing an amendment would be against the law? No me. Glad I just raise goats. Are there any other amendments that arent allowed to be discussed?Quote:
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
Not a lawyer so I really dont know. Is discussing the 25th amendment illegal? Does discussing the 25th or discussing impeachment count as a coup these days? I always thought coups, by accepted definitions, involved violence and rioting in the streets and blood on the moon. not old men sitting around talking.
Jack, I dont have much of an imagination. Is the coup a part of someone's imagination?
25th, yes.
Impeachment, no.
This is the answer that confused me.
25th, yes.
Impeachment, no.
Always get the facts. Why is that a problem?ValhallaBear said:Unless it's the FBI going after Trump or protecting Hillary. Then it's 'wait for the investigation to complete'quash said:Things you hate: rule of law, free speech, freedom of contract, the right to carry in your marijuana patch, stuff like that.Florda_mike said:quash said:You and the boys have pushed the boundary for conservative into the weeds.Florda_mike said:
Quash ..... wrong on both counts!
Huh boys?
Fair enough
And tell us, what are you pushing???
Not.quash said:Things you hate: rule of law, free speech, freedom of contract, the right to carry in your marijuana patch, stuff like that.Florda_mike said:quash said:You and the boys have pushed the boundary for conservative into the weeds.Florda_mike said:
Quash ..... wrong on both counts!
Huh boys?
Fair enough
And tell us, what are you pushing???
Yowza!quash said:Things you hate: rule of law, free speech, freedom of contract, the right to carry in your marijuana patch, stuff like that.Florda_mike said:quash said:You and the boys have pushed the boundary for conservative into the weeds.Florda_mike said:
Quash ..... wrong on both counts!
Huh boys?
Fair enough
And tell us, what are you pushing???
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:Thanks. So talking about the 25th amendment isnt against the law but does count as a coup. Thanks for the clarification.GrowlTowel said:Does discussing the 25th or discussing impeachment count as a coup these days?Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:GrowlTowel said:Never said discussing it was against the law. Carry on.Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
Thanks GT. I like to learn something new everyday. Who would have thought discussing an amendment would be against the law? No me. Glad I just raise goats. Are there any other amendments that arent allowed to be discussed?Quote:
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
Not a lawyer so I really dont know. Is discussing the 25th amendment illegal? Does discussing the 25th or discussing impeachment count as a coup these days? I always thought coups, by accepted definitions, involved violence and rioting in the streets and blood on the moon. not old men sitting around talking.
Jack, I dont have much of an imagination. Is the coup a part of someone's imagination?
25th, yes.
Impeachment, no.
This is the answer that confused me.
25th, yes.
Impeachment, no.
Absolutely true and they know it.HuMcK said:Canada2017 said:PartyBear said:
Psychology professors at Baylor and Psychiatry professors at medical schools really should assign reading this board just as a lab to get the students some practical application exercises.
Good grief man....connect the dots. The actions of the FBI and DOJ in collaboration with certain segments of the national media goes way beyond the traditional Democrat vs Republican political horseplay .
Much as I despise what Barrack Hussein Obama attempted to do to this country .....I would be outraged if it came to light individuals in the FBI and DOJ conspired against him.
Trump is POTUS in part because his opponent was very publicly being investigated by the FBI during the campaign while the investigation into Trump remained an undisclosed secret. The idea that the FBI was "weaponized" against Trump and soft on Clinton is the kind of funhouse mirror opposite-from-truth narrative that would feel right at home in 1984. You have to ignore everything that went down in 2016 and your own lying eyes to believe it, but a stout Republican propaganda operation seems to have taken care of that for Trump supporters.
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:Thanks. So talking about the 25th amendment isnt against the law but does count as a coup. Thanks for the clarification.GrowlTowel said:Does discussing the 25th or discussing impeachment count as a coup these days?Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:GrowlTowel said:Never said discussing it was against the law. Carry on.Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
Thanks GT. I like to learn something new everyday. Who would have thought discussing an amendment would be against the law? No me. Glad I just raise goats. Are there any other amendments that arent allowed to be discussed?Quote:
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
Not a lawyer so I really dont know. Is discussing the 25th amendment illegal? Does discussing the 25th or discussing impeachment count as a coup these days? I always thought coups, by accepted definitions, involved violence and rioting in the streets and blood on the moon. not old men sitting around talking.
Jack, I dont have much of an imagination. Is the coup a part of someone's imagination?
25th, yes.
Impeachment, no.
This is the answer that confused me.
25th, yes.
Impeachment, no.
Have you been in a coma the last 3 years? You do realize this is 100% false about Trump?HuMcK said:Canada2017 said:PartyBear said:
Psychology professors at Baylor and Psychiatry professors at medical schools really should assign reading this board just as a lab to get the students some practical application exercises.
Good grief man....connect the dots. The actions of the FBI and DOJ in collaboration with certain segments of the national media goes way beyond the traditional Democrat vs Republican political horseplay .
Much as I despise what Barrack Hussein Obama attempted to do to this country .....I would be outraged if it came to light individuals in the FBI and DOJ conspired against him.
Trump is POTUS in part because his opponent was very publicly being investigated by the FBI during the campaign while the investigation into Trump remained an undisclosed secret. The idea that the FBI was "weaponized" against Trump and soft on Clinton is the kind of funhouse mirror opposite-from-truth narrative that would feel right at home in 1984. You have to ignore everything that went down in 2016 and your own lying eyes to believe it, but a stout Republican propaganda operation seems to have taken care of that for Trump supporters.
Help her? They sunk her when Comey made his announcement shortly before the election. Did you get a memory wipe??riflebear said:HuMcK said:Canada2017 said:PartyBear said:
Psychology professors at Baylor and Psychiatry professors at medical schools really should assign reading this board just as a lab to get the students some practical application exercises.
Good grief man....connect the dots. The actions of the FBI and DOJ in collaboration with certain segments of the national media goes way beyond the traditional Democrat vs Republican political horseplay .
Much as I despise what Barrack Hussein Obama attempted to do to this country .....I would be outraged if it came to light individuals in the FBI and DOJ conspired against him.
Trump is POTUS in part because his opponent was very publicly being investigated by the FBI during the campaign while the investigation into Trump remained an undisclosed secret. The idea that the FBI was "weaponized" against Trump and soft on Clinton is the kind of funhouse mirror opposite-from-truth narrative that would feel right at home in 1984. You have to ignore everything that went down in 2016 and your own lying eyes to believe it, but a stout Republican propaganda operation seems to have taken care of that for Trump supporters.
She should be in jail and everyone knows it (including Obama's DOJ/FBI) who hid and covered up the facts to help her win the Presidency.
You need a memory wipe. Comey's reasoning for the new investigation/announcement was that new evidence had surfaced and he wanted to HURRY and clear her because he didn't like the idea of an incoming elected president to be under investigation.quash said:Help her? They sunk her when Comey made his announcement shortly before the election. Did you get a memory wipe??riflebear said:HuMcK said:Canada2017 said:PartyBear said:
Psychology professors at Baylor and Psychiatry professors at medical schools really should assign reading this board just as a lab to get the students some practical application exercises.
Good grief man....connect the dots. The actions of the FBI and DOJ in collaboration with certain segments of the national media goes way beyond the traditional Democrat vs Republican political horseplay .
Much as I despise what Barrack Hussein Obama attempted to do to this country .....I would be outraged if it came to light individuals in the FBI and DOJ conspired against him.
Trump is POTUS in part because his opponent was very publicly being investigated by the FBI during the campaign while the investigation into Trump remained an undisclosed secret. The idea that the FBI was "weaponized" against Trump and soft on Clinton is the kind of funhouse mirror opposite-from-truth narrative that would feel right at home in 1984. You have to ignore everything that went down in 2016 and your own lying eyes to believe it, but a stout Republican propaganda operation seems to have taken care of that for Trump supporters.
She should be in jail and everyone knows it (including Obama's DOJ/FBI) who hid and covered up the facts to help her win the Presidency.
I do believe it. James Comey said it himself.Waco1947 said:
Do you really believe your nonsense? Comey sunk HRC
Yes, and he was wrong, he cost her the election. He was right not to prosecute, though, as he had insufficient evidence of intent to benefit a foreign power.Doc Holliday said:You need a memory wipe. Comey's reasoning for the new investigation/announcement was that new evidence had surfaced and he wanted to HURRY and clear her because he didn't like the idea of an incoming elected president to be under investigation.quash said:Help her? They sunk her when Comey made his announcement shortly before the election. Did you get a memory wipe??riflebear said:HuMcK said:Canada2017 said:PartyBear said:
Psychology professors at Baylor and Psychiatry professors at medical schools really should assign reading this board just as a lab to get the students some practical application exercises.
Good grief man....connect the dots. The actions of the FBI and DOJ in collaboration with certain segments of the national media goes way beyond the traditional Democrat vs Republican political horseplay .
Much as I despise what Barrack Hussein Obama attempted to do to this country .....I would be outraged if it came to light individuals in the FBI and DOJ conspired against him.
Trump is POTUS in part because his opponent was very publicly being investigated by the FBI during the campaign while the investigation into Trump remained an undisclosed secret. The idea that the FBI was "weaponized" against Trump and soft on Clinton is the kind of funhouse mirror opposite-from-truth narrative that would feel right at home in 1984. You have to ignore everything that went down in 2016 and your own lying eyes to believe it, but a stout Republican propaganda operation seems to have taken care of that for Trump supporters.
She should be in jail and everyone knows it (including Obama's DOJ/FBI) who hid and covered up the facts to help her win the Presidency.
Funny, they had Trump under investigation before and after. Rules apply to different political ideologies.
No, Comey did not 'cost her the election'.quash said:Yes, and he was wrong, he cost her the election. He was right not to prosecute, though, as he had insufficient evidence of intent to benefit a foreign power.Doc Holliday said:You need a memory wipe. Comey's reasoning for the new investigation/announcement was that new evidence had surfaced and he wanted to HURRY and clear her because he didn't like the idea of an incoming elected president to be under investigation.quash said:Help her? They sunk her when Comey made his announcement shortly before the election. Did you get a memory wipe??riflebear said:HuMcK said:Canada2017 said:PartyBear said:
Psychology professors at Baylor and Psychiatry professors at medical schools really should assign reading this board just as a lab to get the students some practical application exercises.
Good grief man....connect the dots. The actions of the FBI and DOJ in collaboration with certain segments of the national media goes way beyond the traditional Democrat vs Republican political horseplay .
Much as I despise what Barrack Hussein Obama attempted to do to this country .....I would be outraged if it came to light individuals in the FBI and DOJ conspired against him.
Trump is POTUS in part because his opponent was very publicly being investigated by the FBI during the campaign while the investigation into Trump remained an undisclosed secret. The idea that the FBI was "weaponized" against Trump and soft on Clinton is the kind of funhouse mirror opposite-from-truth narrative that would feel right at home in 1984. You have to ignore everything that went down in 2016 and your own lying eyes to believe it, but a stout Republican propaganda operation seems to have taken care of that for Trump supporters.
She should be in jail and everyone knows it (including Obama's DOJ/FBI) who hid and covered up the facts to help her win the Presidency.
Funny, they had Trump under investigation before and after. Rules apply to different political ideologies.
So the actual statute is irrelevant when you like the person accused.quash said:
. He was right not to prosecute, though, as he had insufficient evidence of intent to benefit a foreign power.
First time off the high board, eh? Comey didn't cost her jack ****quash said:Yes, and he was wrong, he cost her the election. He was right not to prosecute, though, as he had insufficient evidence of intent to benefit a foreign power.Doc Holliday said:You need a memory wipe. Comey's reasoning for the new investigation/announcement was that new evidence had surfaced and he wanted to HURRY and clear her because he didn't like the idea of an incoming elected president to be under investigation.quash said:Help her? They sunk her when Comey made his announcement shortly before the election. Did you get a memory wipe??riflebear said:HuMcK said:Canada2017 said:PartyBear said:
Psychology professors at Baylor and Psychiatry professors at medical schools really should assign reading this board just as a lab to get the students some practical application exercises.
Good grief man....connect the dots. The actions of the FBI and DOJ in collaboration with certain segments of the national media goes way beyond the traditional Democrat vs Republican political horseplay .
Much as I despise what Barrack Hussein Obama attempted to do to this country .....I would be outraged if it came to light individuals in the FBI and DOJ conspired against him.
Trump is POTUS in part because his opponent was very publicly being investigated by the FBI during the campaign while the investigation into Trump remained an undisclosed secret. The idea that the FBI was "weaponized" against Trump and soft on Clinton is the kind of funhouse mirror opposite-from-truth narrative that would feel right at home in 1984. You have to ignore everything that went down in 2016 and your own lying eyes to believe it, but a stout Republican propaganda operation seems to have taken care of that for Trump supporters.
She should be in jail and everyone knows it (including Obama's DOJ/FBI) who hid and covered up the facts to help her win the Presidency.
Funny, they had Trump under investigation before and after. Rules apply to different political ideologies.
Oldbear83 said:No, Comey did not 'cost her the election'.quash said:Yes, and he was wrong, he cost her the election. He was right not to prosecute, though, as he had insufficient evidence of intent to benefit a foreign power.Doc Holliday said:You need a memory wipe. Comey's reasoning for the new investigation/announcement was that new evidence had surfaced and he wanted to HURRY and clear her because he didn't like the idea of an incoming elected president to be under investigation.quash said:Help her? They sunk her when Comey made his announcement shortly before the election. Did you get a memory wipe??riflebear said:HuMcK said:Canada2017 said:PartyBear said:
Psychology professors at Baylor and Psychiatry professors at medical schools really should assign reading this board just as a lab to get the students some practical application exercises.
Good grief man....connect the dots. The actions of the FBI and DOJ in collaboration with certain segments of the national media goes way beyond the traditional Democrat vs Republican political horseplay .
Much as I despise what Barrack Hussein Obama attempted to do to this country .....I would be outraged if it came to light individuals in the FBI and DOJ conspired against him.
Trump is POTUS in part because his opponent was very publicly being investigated by the FBI during the campaign while the investigation into Trump remained an undisclosed secret. The idea that the FBI was "weaponized" against Trump and soft on Clinton is the kind of funhouse mirror opposite-from-truth narrative that would feel right at home in 1984. You have to ignore everything that went down in 2016 and your own lying eyes to believe it, but a stout Republican propaganda operation seems to have taken care of that for Trump supporters.
She should be in jail and everyone knows it (including Obama's DOJ/FBI) who hid and covered up the facts to help her win the Presidency.
Funny, they had Trump under investigation before and after. Rules apply to different political ideologies.
That was always on Hillary, even if she - and apparently you - cannot grasp that basic fact of life.
ValhallaBear said:First time off the high board, eh? Comey didn't cost her jack ****quash said:Yes, and he was wrong, he cost her the election. He was right not to prosecute, though, as he had insufficient evidence of intent to benefit a foreign power.Doc Holliday said:You need a memory wipe. Comey's reasoning for the new investigation/announcement was that new evidence had surfaced and he wanted to HURRY and clear her because he didn't like the idea of an incoming elected president to be under investigation.quash said:Help her? They sunk her when Comey made his announcement shortly before the election. Did you get a memory wipe??riflebear said:HuMcK said:Canada2017 said:PartyBear said:
Psychology professors at Baylor and Psychiatry professors at medical schools really should assign reading this board just as a lab to get the students some practical application exercises.
Good grief man....connect the dots. The actions of the FBI and DOJ in collaboration with certain segments of the national media goes way beyond the traditional Democrat vs Republican political horseplay .
Much as I despise what Barrack Hussein Obama attempted to do to this country .....I would be outraged if it came to light individuals in the FBI and DOJ conspired against him.
Trump is POTUS in part because his opponent was very publicly being investigated by the FBI during the campaign while the investigation into Trump remained an undisclosed secret. The idea that the FBI was "weaponized" against Trump and soft on Clinton is the kind of funhouse mirror opposite-from-truth narrative that would feel right at home in 1984. You have to ignore everything that went down in 2016 and your own lying eyes to believe it, but a stout Republican propaganda operation seems to have taken care of that for Trump supporters.
She should be in jail and everyone knows it (including Obama's DOJ/FBI) who hid and covered up the facts to help her win the Presidency.
Funny, they had Trump under investigation before and after. Rules apply to different political ideologies.
He HAD to reopen the investigation because NYPD and NY FBI were busting his balls over the fact that they knew what was on Weiner's laptop yet McCabe sat on it for 3 and a half weeks
Then Lynch got involved and started threatening NYPD with reopening the Eric Garner case
Delusional.HuMcK said:Canada2017 said:PartyBear said:
Psychology professors at Baylor and Psychiatry professors at medical schools really should assign reading this board just as a lab to get the students some practical application exercises.
Good grief man....connect the dots. The actions of the FBI and DOJ in collaboration with certain segments of the national media goes way beyond the traditional Democrat vs Republican political horseplay .
Much as I despise what Barrack Hussein Obama attempted to do to this country .....I would be outraged if it came to light individuals in the FBI and DOJ conspired against him.
Trump is POTUS in part because his opponent was very publicly being investigated by the FBI during the campaign while the investigation into Trump remained an undisclosed secret. The idea that the FBI was "weaponized" against Trump and soft on Clinton is the kind of funhouse mirror opposite-from-truth narrative that would feel right at home in 1984. You have to ignore everything that went down in 2016 and your own lying eyes to believe it, but a stout Republican propaganda operation seems to have taken care of that for Trump supporters.
Your opinion on this point is not even good fiction.quash said:Oldbear83 said:No, Comey did not 'cost her the election'.quash said:Yes, and he was wrong, he cost her the election. He was right not to prosecute, though, as he had insufficient evidence of intent to benefit a foreign power.Doc Holliday said:You need a memory wipe. Comey's reasoning for the new investigation/announcement was that new evidence had surfaced and he wanted to HURRY and clear her because he didn't like the idea of an incoming elected president to be under investigation.quash said:Help her? They sunk her when Comey made his announcement shortly before the election. Did you get a memory wipe??riflebear said:HuMcK said:Canada2017 said:PartyBear said:
Psychology professors at Baylor and Psychiatry professors at medical schools really should assign reading this board just as a lab to get the students some practical application exercises.
Good grief man....connect the dots. The actions of the FBI and DOJ in collaboration with certain segments of the national media goes way beyond the traditional Democrat vs Republican political horseplay .
Much as I despise what Barrack Hussein Obama attempted to do to this country .....I would be outraged if it came to light individuals in the FBI and DOJ conspired against him.
Trump is POTUS in part because his opponent was very publicly being investigated by the FBI during the campaign while the investigation into Trump remained an undisclosed secret. The idea that the FBI was "weaponized" against Trump and soft on Clinton is the kind of funhouse mirror opposite-from-truth narrative that would feel right at home in 1984. You have to ignore everything that went down in 2016 and your own lying eyes to believe it, but a stout Republican propaganda operation seems to have taken care of that for Trump supporters.
She should be in jail and everyone knows it (including Obama's DOJ/FBI) who hid and covered up the facts to help her win the Presidency.
Funny, they had Trump under investigation before and after. Rules apply to different political ideologies.
That was always on Hillary, even if she - and apparently you - cannot grasp that basic fact of life.
Your opinion is not a fact.
Excuses are for losers - Vince Lombardiquash said:ValhallaBear said:First time off the high board, eh? Comey didn't cost her jack ****quash said:Yes, and he was wrong, he cost her the election. He was right not to prosecute, though, as he had insufficient evidence of intent to benefit a foreign power.Doc Holliday said:You need a memory wipe. Comey's reasoning for the new investigation/announcement was that new evidence had surfaced and he wanted to HURRY and clear her because he didn't like the idea of an incoming elected president to be under investigation.quash said:Help her? They sunk her when Comey made his announcement shortly before the election. Did you get a memory wipe??riflebear said:HuMcK said:Canada2017 said:PartyBear said:
Psychology professors at Baylor and Psychiatry professors at medical schools really should assign reading this board just as a lab to get the students some practical application exercises.
Good grief man....connect the dots. The actions of the FBI and DOJ in collaboration with certain segments of the national media goes way beyond the traditional Democrat vs Republican political horseplay .
Much as I despise what Barrack Hussein Obama attempted to do to this country .....I would be outraged if it came to light individuals in the FBI and DOJ conspired against him.
Trump is POTUS in part because his opponent was very publicly being investigated by the FBI during the campaign while the investigation into Trump remained an undisclosed secret. The idea that the FBI was "weaponized" against Trump and soft on Clinton is the kind of funhouse mirror opposite-from-truth narrative that would feel right at home in 1984. You have to ignore everything that went down in 2016 and your own lying eyes to believe it, but a stout Republican propaganda operation seems to have taken care of that for Trump supporters.
She should be in jail and everyone knows it (including Obama's DOJ/FBI) who hid and covered up the facts to help her win the Presidency.
Funny, they had Trump under investigation before and after. Rules apply to different political ideologies.
He HAD to reopen the investigation because NYPD and NY FBI were busting his balls over the fact that they knew what was on Weiner's laptop yet McCabe sat on it for 3 and a half weeks
Then Lynch got involved and started threatening NYPD with reopening the Eric Garner case
Yay.
Now about the highlighted text...
Never mind the dictionaries, let's just rewrite the 25th:quash said:Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:Thanks. So talking about the 25th amendment isnt against the law but does count as a coup. Thanks for the clarification.GrowlTowel said:Does discussing the 25th or discussing impeachment count as a coup these days?Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:GrowlTowel said:Never said discussing it was against the law. Carry on.Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
Thanks GT. I like to learn something new everyday. Who would have thought discussing an amendment would be against the law? No me. Glad I just raise goats. Are there any other amendments that arent allowed to be discussed?Quote:
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
Not a lawyer so I really dont know. Is discussing the 25th amendment illegal? Does discussing the 25th or discussing impeachment count as a coup these days? I always thought coups, by accepted definitions, involved violence and rioting in the streets and blood on the moon. not old men sitting around talking.
Jack, I dont have much of an imagination. Is the coup a part of someone's imagination?
25th, yes.
Impeachment, no.
This is the answer that confused me.
25th, yes.
Impeachment, no.
Dictionaries going into heavy re-write.
Your excuses as to why the investigation was re-opened may be valid. Comey was still wrong about Clinton getting elected, wasn't he?ValhallaBear said:Excuses are for losers - Vince Lombardiquash said:ValhallaBear said:First time off the high board, eh? Comey didn't cost her jack ****quash said:Yes, and he was wrong, he cost her the election. He was right not to prosecute, though, as he had insufficient evidence of intent to benefit a foreign power.Doc Holliday said:You need a memory wipe. Comey's reasoning for the new investigation/announcement was that new evidence had surfaced and he wanted to HURRY and clear her because he didn't like the idea of an incoming elected president to be under investigation.quash said:Help her? They sunk her when Comey made his announcement shortly before the election. Did you get a memory wipe??riflebear said:HuMcK said:Canada2017 said:PartyBear said:
Psychology professors at Baylor and Psychiatry professors at medical schools really should assign reading this board just as a lab to get the students some practical application exercises.
Good grief man....connect the dots. The actions of the FBI and DOJ in collaboration with certain segments of the national media goes way beyond the traditional Democrat vs Republican political horseplay .
Much as I despise what Barrack Hussein Obama attempted to do to this country .....I would be outraged if it came to light individuals in the FBI and DOJ conspired against him.
Trump is POTUS in part because his opponent was very publicly being investigated by the FBI during the campaign while the investigation into Trump remained an undisclosed secret. The idea that the FBI was "weaponized" against Trump and soft on Clinton is the kind of funhouse mirror opposite-from-truth narrative that would feel right at home in 1984. You have to ignore everything that went down in 2016 and your own lying eyes to believe it, but a stout Republican propaganda operation seems to have taken care of that for Trump supporters.
She should be in jail and everyone knows it (including Obama's DOJ/FBI) who hid and covered up the facts to help her win the Presidency.
Funny, they had Trump under investigation before and after. Rules apply to different political ideologies.
He HAD to reopen the investigation because NYPD and NY FBI were busting his balls over the fact that they knew what was on Weiner's laptop yet McCabe sat on it for 3 and a half weeks
Then Lynch got involved and started threatening NYPD with reopening the Eric Garner case
Yay.
Now about the highlighted text...
Here's my wallet..Ouch - Seth Rich
It was a factorquash said:Your excuses as to why the investigation was re-opened may be valid. Comey was still wrong about Clinton getting elected, wasn't he?ValhallaBear said:Excuses are for losers - Vince Lombardiquash said:ValhallaBear said:First time off the high board, eh? Comey didn't cost her jack ****quash said:Yes, and he was wrong, he cost her the election. He was right not to prosecute, though, as he had insufficient evidence of intent to benefit a foreign power.Doc Holliday said:You need a memory wipe. Comey's reasoning for the new investigation/announcement was that new evidence had surfaced and he wanted to HURRY and clear her because he didn't like the idea of an incoming elected president to be under investigation.quash said:Help her? They sunk her when Comey made his announcement shortly before the election. Did you get a memory wipe??riflebear said:HuMcK said:Canada2017 said:PartyBear said:
Psychology professors at Baylor and Psychiatry professors at medical schools really should assign reading this board just as a lab to get the students some practical application exercises.
Good grief man....connect the dots. The actions of the FBI and DOJ in collaboration with certain segments of the national media goes way beyond the traditional Democrat vs Republican political horseplay .
Much as I despise what Barrack Hussein Obama attempted to do to this country .....I would be outraged if it came to light individuals in the FBI and DOJ conspired against him.
Trump is POTUS in part because his opponent was very publicly being investigated by the FBI during the campaign while the investigation into Trump remained an undisclosed secret. The idea that the FBI was "weaponized" against Trump and soft on Clinton is the kind of funhouse mirror opposite-from-truth narrative that would feel right at home in 1984. You have to ignore everything that went down in 2016 and your own lying eyes to believe it, but a stout Republican propaganda operation seems to have taken care of that for Trump supporters.
She should be in jail and everyone knows it (including Obama's DOJ/FBI) who hid and covered up the facts to help her win the Presidency.
Funny, they had Trump under investigation before and after. Rules apply to different political ideologies.
He HAD to reopen the investigation because NYPD and NY FBI were busting his balls over the fact that they knew what was on Weiner's laptop yet McCabe sat on it for 3 and a half weeks
Then Lynch got involved and started threatening NYPD with reopening the Eric Garner case
Yay.
Now about the highlighted text...
Here's my wallet..Ouch - Seth Rich
As to whether it cost her the election:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jun/15/shameless-president-trump-comey-emails-clinton-charity
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-comey-letter-probably-cost-clinton-the-election/
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/392239-clinton-campaign-chief-says-there-is-good-evidence-comey-blew-the-election
"When Der Spiegel told Comey that Clinton "plunged in the polls" after his announcement, he said "obviously, it could have" played a roll in her loss, but he didn't make the decision for political reasons."
Find your soul yet, Waco?Waco1947 said:
Yep!
I always have it. God gave it to me. No one can take it away. Not even judgmental Pharisees.Oldbear83 said:Find your soul yet, Waco?Waco1947 said:
Yep!
Of course women have souls.Waco1947 said:I always have it. God gave it to me. No one can take it away. Not even judgmental Pharisees.Oldbear83 said:Find your soul yet, Waco?Waco1947 said:
Yep!
Now then, do women have God given souls?
Did God form the Amalkites in the womb and order Israel to destroy every last man, woman, and child? God is not quite as crystal clear as you wish.
Thank you. Finally! Women have souls (and bodies). Can you tell a woman what to do with her body? If you can then what is rape?Oldbear83 said:Of course women have souls.Waco1947 said:I always have it. God gave it to me. No one can take it away. Not even judgmental Pharisees.Oldbear83 said:Find your soul yet, Waco?Waco1947 said:
Yep!
Now then, do women have God given souls?
Did God form the Amalkites in the womb and order Israel to destroy every last man, woman, and child? God is not quite as crystal clear as you wish.
So do children, including the unborn.
Yes, God gave you your soul. But yours is like Herod's, you think whatever you do is good. Even abortion.
Waco1947 said:Thank you. Finally! Women have souls (and bodies). Can you tell a woman what to do with her body? If you can then what is rape?Oldbear83 said:Of course women have souls.Waco1947 said:I always have it. God gave it to me. No one can take it away. Not even judgmental Pharisees.Oldbear83 said:Find your soul yet, Waco?Waco1947 said:
Yep!
Now then, do women have God given souls?
Did God form the Amalkites in the womb and order Israel to destroy every last man, woman, and child? God is not quite as crystal clear as you wish.
So do children, including the unborn.
Yes, God gave you your soul. But yours is like Herod's, you think whatever you do is good. Even abortion.
