Jack Bauer said:
CNN:
"JFK involved in automobile accident in Dallas"
"Reagan pushed around for having a Hinkling."
Jack Bauer said:
CNN:
"JFK involved in automobile accident in Dallas"
🎯🎯🎯 pic.twitter.com/NQxazBP8Q4
— Not Jerome Powell (@alifarhat79) July 20, 2024
CBS NewsKaiBear said:TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:KaiBear said:Doc Holliday said:It means that whether if it was due to incompetence or an inside job, the establishment has not intentions of preventing this from happening again.Osodecentx said:Doc Holliday said:— subdermal13 (@tattoosbyjon) July 20, 2024
And you know what that means
Trump will win if he survives and there's a good chance he doesn't
A. Has been reported that the FBI has determined that the shooter possessed 2-3 overseas ENCRYPTED servers. If true the lone wolf narrative will be finally trashed.
B. A viable threat was identified 5 minutes before Trump was to speak but they STILL let him go on stage. But of course Trump has only been persecuted by the Dem establishment for years including the President 's 'put a bullseye on him ' comment makes such a security lapse an innocent mistake.
C. Only 22 SS agents protecting Trump in a rally involving tens of thousands of individuals in an open air venue. SS protection limited to only 150 yards in the face of countless threats including threats of revenge from overseas.
Crooks had assistance.
Period .
Will be interesting if your comment A above actually ever gets confirmation. If it were true, I'd suspect the same FBI that conspired against Trump with the same Democrat oversight to make that just disappear.
Only heard this from once questionable source……Fox News.
Supposedly the FBI is attempting to break through the encryption security.
However I no longer trust the FBI in any situation.
Donald Trump Truth Social 03:15 PM EST 07/20/24 @realDonaldTrump pic.twitter.com/240MsmBAmf
— Donald J. Trump Posts From His Truth Social (@TrumpDailyPosts) July 20, 2024
hodedofome said:
You mean the gunman's accomplices were able to fly the drone…
Nobody is saying women can’t run intelligence units or even serve as snipers. The issue is that a 5’2” agent who weighs like 99 pounds cannot possibly defend a man who is a full foot taller and wider than her!!! Please engage with the criticism on the merits and report back. https://t.co/rDJ4pRQFLv
— Tiana Lowe Doescher (@TianaTheFirst) July 20, 2024
And Mayorkas has done so well taking care of the southern border.Jack Bauer said:Nobody is saying women can’t run intelligence units or even serve as snipers. The issue is that a 5’2” agent who weighs like 99 pounds cannot possibly defend a man who is a full foot taller and wider than her!!! Please engage with the criticism on the merits and report back. https://t.co/rDJ4pRQFLv
— Tiana Lowe Doescher (@TianaTheFirst) July 20, 2024
Assassin said:CBS NewsKaiBear said:TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:KaiBear said:Doc Holliday said:It means that whether if it was due to incompetence or an inside job, the establishment has not intentions of preventing this from happening again.Osodecentx said:Doc Holliday said:— subdermal13 (@tattoosbyjon) July 20, 2024
And you know what that means
Trump will win if he survives and there's a good chance he doesn't
A. Has been reported that the FBI has determined that the shooter possessed 2-3 overseas ENCRYPTED servers. If true the lone wolf narrative will be finally trashed.
B. A viable threat was identified 5 minutes before Trump was to speak but they STILL let him go on stage. But of course Trump has only been persecuted by the Dem establishment for years including the President 's 'put a bullseye on him ' comment makes such a security lapse an innocent mistake.
C. Only 22 SS agents protecting Trump in a rally involving tens of thousands of individuals in an open air venue. SS protection limited to only 150 yards in the face of countless threats including threats of revenge from overseas.
Crooks had assistance.
Period .
Will be interesting if your comment A above actually ever gets confirmation. If it were true, I'd suspect the same FBI that conspired against Trump with the same Democrat oversight to make that just disappear.
Only heard this from once questionable source……Fox News.
Supposedly the FBI is attempting to break through the encryption security.
However I no longer trust the FBI in any situation.
Investigators trying to access foreign encrypted platforms used by Crooks
The briefers told lawmakers they are still attempting to access three foreign encrypted platforms that Crooks used on his cellphone, multiple sources told CBS News. Sources said officials told lawmakers that the encrypted sites are presenting challenges to investigators and could take time to decrypt.
Realitybites said:
Forensics say as many as 3 guns fired at Trump rally
From CNN.com: "Forensic analysis suggests that as many as three weapons were fired at the Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania on Saturday.
The FBI said Sunday that the shooter acted alone.
The first three shots were consistent with alleged weapon A, the next five were consistent with alleged weapon B, and the final "acoustic impulse' was emitted by a possible weapon C, per audio analysis by Catalin Grigoras, director of the National Center for Media Forensics at the University of Colorado in Denver, and Cole Whitecotton, Senior Professional Research Associate at the same institution.
Audio analysis has also confirmed that the gunman was about 369 to 393 feet from the podium, according to forensics expert Robert Maher.
This conclusion aligns with CNN's analysis that the gunman was on a rooftop 393 to 492 feet from the podium when shots rang out.
The shots exemplify a "crack-pop' sequence, typical when a supersonic bullet passes a microphone, before the "arrival of the corresponding muzzle blast sound," Maher, who teaches audio forensics at Montana State University, told CNN.
The time between these markers places the shooter 110 to 120 meters from the microphone, Maher said, assuming the bullet is moving at an average speed of 800 to 1,000 meters per second, the equivalent of 2,600 to 3,280 feet per second."
Weapon A was presumably Crooks, and the missed head shot. Weapon C was the SS Countersniper who killed him. That leaves Weapon B unaccounted for, and a second shooter unaccounted for.
Yeah. Absolutely clear that two shooters in two different locations were firing at Trump. My guess is that the first set of three -shots were from further away, and a company-affiliated or private professional shooter. The second set from closer in were Crooks and his AR. The final shot was the SS sniper batting cleanup when he shot Crooks.Married A Horn said:Realitybites said:
Forensics say as many as 3 guns fired at Trump rally
From CNN.com: "Forensic analysis suggests that as many as three weapons were fired at the Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania on Saturday.
The FBI said Sunday that the shooter acted alone.
The first three shots were consistent with alleged weapon A, the next five were consistent with alleged weapon B, and the final "acoustic impulse' was emitted by a possible weapon C, per audio analysis by Catalin Grigoras, director of the National Center for Media Forensics at the University of Colorado in Denver, and Cole Whitecotton, Senior Professional Research Associate at the same institution.
Audio analysis has also confirmed that the gunman was about 369 to 393 feet from the podium, according to forensics expert Robert Maher.
This conclusion aligns with CNN's analysis that the gunman was on a rooftop 393 to 492 feet from the podium when shots rang out.
The shots exemplify a "crack-pop' sequence, typical when a supersonic bullet passes a microphone, before the "arrival of the corresponding muzzle blast sound," Maher, who teaches audio forensics at Montana State University, told CNN.
The time between these markers places the shooter 110 to 120 meters from the microphone, Maher said, assuming the bullet is moving at an average speed of 800 to 1,000 meters per second, the equivalent of 2,600 to 3,280 feet per second."
Weapon A was presumably Crooks, and the missed head shot. Weapon C was the SS Countersniper who killed him. That leaves Weapon B unaccounted for, and a second shooter unaccounted for.
Needs its own thread. I'll go start one. When u hear the audio it is undeniable that there is a 2nd shooter.
First Congressional Democrat calls for Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle to resign https://t.co/hOVUh62WVy
— Axios (@axios) July 21, 2024
one would think more Democrats would be calling for this, given that the SS protects THEIR GUY too.boognish_bear said:First Congressional Democrat calls for Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle to resign https://t.co/hOVUh62WVy
— Axios (@axios) July 21, 2024
whiterock said:one would think more Democrats would be calling for this, given that the SS protects THEIR GUY too.boognish_bear said:First Congressional Democrat calls for Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle to resign https://t.co/hOVUh62WVy
— Axios (@axios) July 21, 2024
Isnt he still in hiding from his faux Covid attack?Married A Horn said:No. Since he is behind in polls they are okay with him being taken out.whiterock said:one would think more Democrats would be calling for this, given that the SS protects THEIR GUY too.boognish_bear said:First Congressional Democrat calls for Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle to resign https://t.co/hOVUh62WVy
— Axios (@axios) July 21, 2024
I expect this week we will hear about a new COVID variant ('Cornpop') where people suffering from the variant freeze in place for long periods of time, forget the names of close friends and relatives, and wander off without warning.Assassin said:Isnt he still in hiding from his faux Covid attack?Married A Horn said:No. Since he is behind in polls they are okay with him being taken out.whiterock said:one would think more Democrats would be calling for this, given that the SS protects THEIR GUY too.boognish_bear said:First Congressional Democrat calls for Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle to resign https://t.co/hOVUh62WVy
— Axios (@axios) July 21, 2024
Married A Horn said:Realitybites said:
Forensics say as many as 3 guns fired at Trump rally
From CNN.com: "Forensic analysis suggests that as many as three weapons were fired at the Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania on Saturday.
The FBI said Sunday that the shooter acted alone.
The first three shots were consistent with alleged weapon A, the next five were consistent with alleged weapon B, and the final "acoustic impulse' was emitted by a possible weapon C, per audio analysis by Catalin Grigoras, director of the National Center for Media Forensics at the University of Colorado in Denver, and Cole Whitecotton, Senior Professional Research Associate at the same institution.
Audio analysis has also confirmed that the gunman was about 369 to 393 feet from the podium, according to forensics expert Robert Maher.
This conclusion aligns with CNN's analysis that the gunman was on a rooftop 393 to 492 feet from the podium when shots rang out.
The shots exemplify a "crack-pop' sequence, typical when a supersonic bullet passes a microphone, before the "arrival of the corresponding muzzle blast sound," Maher, who teaches audio forensics at Montana State University, told CNN.
The time between these markers places the shooter 110 to 120 meters from the microphone, Maher said, assuming the bullet is moving at an average speed of 800 to 1,000 meters per second, the equivalent of 2,600 to 3,280 feet per second."
Weapon A was presumably Crooks, and the missed head shot. Weapon C was the SS Countersniper who killed him. That leaves Weapon B unaccounted for, and a second shooter unaccounted for.
Needs its own thread. I'll go start one. When u hear the audio it is undeniable that there is a 2nd shooter.
It was the man with the umbrella I'm telling you. He was stationed on the grassy knoll, just out of sight of the secret service snipers!FLBear5630 said:2nd shooter, why? They nicked his ear, didn't even require stitches. 2 gunmen needed to accomplish all that? So who was the 2nd shooter shooting? The other gunman? Ballistics will show that. The only thing that makes less sense than the kid being a pro is two pros did this.Married A Horn said:Needs its own thread. I'll go start one. When u hear the audio it is undeniable that there is a 2nd shooter.Realitybites said:
Forensics say as many as 3 guns fired at Trump rally
From CNN.com: "Forensic analysis suggests that as many as three weapons were fired at the Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania on Saturday.
The FBI said Sunday that the shooter acted alone.
The first three shots were consistent with alleged weapon A, the next five were consistent with alleged weapon B, and the final "acoustic impulse' was emitted by a possible weapon C, per audio analysis by Catalin Grigoras, director of the National Center for Media Forensics at the University of Colorado in Denver, and Cole Whitecotton, Senior Professional Research Associate at the same institution.
Audio analysis has also confirmed that the gunman was about 369 to 393 feet from the podium, according to forensics expert Robert Maher.
This conclusion aligns with CNN's analysis that the gunman was on a rooftop 393 to 492 feet from the podium when shots rang out.
The shots exemplify a "crack-pop' sequence, typical when a supersonic bullet passes a microphone, before the "arrival of the corresponding muzzle blast sound," Maher, who teaches audio forensics at Montana State University, told CNN.
The time between these markers places the shooter 110 to 120 meters from the microphone, Maher said, assuming the bullet is moving at an average speed of 800 to 1,000 meters per second, the equivalent of 2,600 to 3,280 feet per second."
Weapon A was presumably Crooks, and the missed head shot. Weapon C was the SS Countersniper who killed him. That leaves Weapon B unaccounted for, and a second shooter unaccounted for.
You guys really believe a pro was involved with this mess? That 8 shots would be fired from 165ish and the outcome would be one grazed ear, 1 dead civilian and sporadic injuries? Unless you are saying you think the planned outcome wasn't an assassination but something else.Realitybites said:
One pro, one patsy...and listen to the audio, it is clear that the shots are coming from two different places and two different trigger fingers.
Quote:
That 8 shots would be fired from 165ish
I will bet that those shots are other SS. Odds are that they are SS, NOT some guy on the grassy knoll. You still don't address the incompetency and ballistics. Ballistics is the easy part, the shot that killed the fireman AND all the injuries will go through ballistics, each weapon is individual. As for competency, the "pro for Dover" brought in to do whatever this was supposed to accomplish missed a silhouetted lone figure on a stage? Couldn't get the head shot, so he did even try center mass? It was just a spray of AR shots?Realitybites said:Quote:
That 8 shots would be fired from 165ish
Eight shots weren't fired from 165ish.
Three were fired from substantially further. The middle grouping was from 165ish. The final single shot was the SS Sniper killing Crooks. Listen to the audio, it is clear as day. It is impossible to go through the audio forensics and continue to think there was a lone gunman.
And what data are they using? TV soundbites? Where are they getting the audio? FOX? CNN?Realitybites said:
They aren't other SS snipers.
1. The first three shots are from beyond the SS's self described perimeter.
2. The SS did not fire first.
As far as organs of the government lying, I bet you believe that Lee Harvey Oswald killed Kennedy, too. In 2024, private analysis of publicly available evidence is a much more reliable source than anything Chris Wray says.
FLBear5630 said:And what data are they using? TV soundbites? Where are they getting the audio? FOX? CNN?Realitybites said:
They aren't other SS snipers.
1. The first three shots are from beyond the SS's self described perimeter.
2. The SS did not fire first.
As far as organs of the government lying, I bet you believe that Lee Harvey Oswald killed Kennedy, too. In 2024, private analysis of publicly available evidence is a much more reliable source than anything Chris Wray says.
You really believe they have access to better data than Quantico?
This is not 1964, you really think that they can bury the analysis?
As for Oswald, I have no idea. Neither do you. No one does.
You guys keep looking for these grand schemes and often overlook the "Little Man Theory". Sometimes the answer is just the answer. You can find all sorts of strange items in any analysis, there is always quirky data and circumstances.
Congress should hold Cheatle in contempt today and order the Sergeant of Arms to take her into custody.
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) July 22, 2024
This is an abomination and simply cannot be tolerated. She allowed the president to be shot in the head, lied about it for a week and is now stonewalling Congress.
BREAKING: The head of the Secret Service says the assassination attempt of Donald Trump was the agency's “most significant operational failure” in decades. Director Kimberly Cheatle said she took "full responsibility for any security lapse of our agency." https://t.co/0vnlqLq8Eo
— The Associated Press (@AP) July 22, 2024
Took responsibility, what does that mean?boognish_bear said:BREAKING: The head of the Secret Service says the assassination attempt of Donald Trump was the agency's “most significant operational failure” in decades. Director Kimberly Cheatle said she took "full responsibility for any security lapse of our agency." https://t.co/0vnlqLq8Eo
— The Associated Press (@AP) July 22, 2024
If Trump is elected I do hope he releases the study on the JFK assassination. Not sure if anything new will be learned but I still would like to see what little evidence was presented by our government.Realitybites said:
They aren't other SS snipers.
1. The first three shots are from beyond the SS's self described perimeter.
2. The SS did not fire first.
As far as organs of the government lying, I bet you believe that Lee Harvey Oswald killed Kennedy, too. In 2024, private analysis of publicly available evidence is a much more reliable source than anything Chris Wray says.
Even if they do, if it doesn't back up what they want it to say it will be a cover-up. They have personal observational evidence and believe what they think happened or should have happened, which has nothing to do with what really did happen.Aliceinbubbleland said:If Trump is elected I do hope he releases the study on the JFK assassination. Not sure if anything new will be learned but I still would like to see what little evidence was presented by our government.Realitybites said:
They aren't other SS snipers.
1. The first three shots are from beyond the SS's self described perimeter.
2. The SS did not fire first.
As far as organs of the government lying, I bet you believe that Lee Harvey Oswald killed Kennedy, too. In 2024, private analysis of publicly available evidence is a much more reliable source than anything Chris Wray says.
Rep. Ro Khanna calls on Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle to resign, as then-director Stuart Knight did after the Reagan assassination attempt in 1981:
— The Recount (@therecount) July 22, 2024
"What's the difference between your position and what Stuart Knight did?" pic.twitter.com/tsGyDajkmP
The fella that could boot here out of the Directorship is still nowhere to be found. She serves at his pleasure... now that the assassination attempt failed, I would expect her to get booted.FLBear5630 said:Took responsibility, what does that mean?boognish_bear said:BREAKING: The head of the Secret Service says the assassination attempt of Donald Trump was the agency's “most significant operational failure” in decades. Director Kimberly Cheatle said she took "full responsibility for any security lapse of our agency." https://t.co/0vnlqLq8Eo
— The Associated Press (@AP) July 22, 2024
So far, it means she said the "Buck Stops Here" and will sit to answer questions she will say she doesn't know the answers. That is pretty much it. Stil has job, no charges, no termination, re-assignment. Nothing.