Talarico vs Paxton

179,433 Views | 2083 Replies | Last: 9 hrs ago by boognish_bear
OffshoreBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Robert Wilson said:

BearWithMe said:

historian said:

Talarico's radicalism is across the board. He has said that he wants open borders (a giant welcome mat), he's an anti-capitalist, wants to damage the oil and gas energy (major drivers of the economy), etc.

When they tell you who they are, believe them.
What were his next words right after "a giant welcome mat"?

I don't agree with everything Talarico says, but to insinuate that he's for open borders is absolutely insane.


To think Talarico is not for open borders is absolutely insane. Just give him a chance. See what he does/
yep. Talarico called Obama the deporter-in-chief even.
I came for the rumors, stayed for the overreactions.
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's major policy for the left lmao
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JusHappy2BeHere said:

OffshoreBear said:

JusHappy2BeHere said:

OffshoreBear said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

historian said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Robert Wilson said:

Self-destructive pouting is a move.


Pouting is not the right word. PISSED is much more fitting.

My biggest hope is Talarico will be a do nothing Senator. Kinda like Cornyn was.

That's a pipe dream. If Talarico wins and the Dems take the senate they will do as much damage as they can. That's who they are and what they want to do.

The sky is not falling. What you seem to have forgotten is that most all politicians don't keep their campaign promises. This includes Donald Trump. I don't expect Talarico to be any different.
you voted Talafreako?


You voted for a criminal turned in by his own staff, an adulterer divorced by his own wife, a man impeached by his own Party, and a protector of pedophiles?
Pathetic


The Texas Senate acquitted Paxton on every charge. The securities case was dismissed. Staff complaints and a House impeachment still produced zero convictions. That's not a criminal.

The affair and divorce are ugly, no argument. Personal messiness doesn't disqualify someone unless you're ready to empty half of Congress.

"Protector of pedophiles" is pure Talarico campaign sludge over one plea deal after a hung jury. The victim didn't want another trial, so the office cut a deal. Turning that into "he protects pedophiles" is just desperate attack-ad garbage.

Meanwhile you voted for Talarico: pro-trans for kids, anti-2nd Amendment, anti-police, open borders, and higher taxes. That's the actual pathetic choice. I voted for the guy who fights the left instead of the soft-on-crime, soft-on-borders clown running on smears.


Cute. You think aquited means "Not Guilty"
Pro Trans? You mean treating everyone like they are equal citizens of the Republic? Believe it or not, not everyone is a bigot. I'm betting you have never met a Trans person or a Muslim but you are scared ****less of them. You are weak.

Actually, acquitted does mean not guilty. That's how the legal system works. For some people it might be difficult to believe, but there are only two choices. Just like the two sexes (genders).

Of course, not everyone is a bigot. Unfortunately, there still are plenty of bigots in this country, racists, misogynists, haters of Christian's, etc. Usually they are the ones most obsessed by someone's race (or other group identity) and they are always trying to separate people by race or judge people solely on their ethnicity, sex, faith, etc.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Justhappy2beliberal is a left lunatic. He cannot see past that so he makes up stuff in his mind to believe
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
His ideas and lies are far too dangerous, as with the rest of his party. He does not deserve a chance. If the Dems get real power we are all likely to lose freedom and be worse off economically. It's the inevitable result of their policies as was easily observed during Bidenflation.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://freebeacon.com/democrats/we-could-make-prisons-obsolete-james-talarico-called-to-slash-police-budgets-and-spend-the-money-on-social-programs/

Your liberal lunacy is blinding you
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whitetrash said:

JusHappy2BeHere said:

The Dark Money ads attacking James Talarico are all Lies. All you have to do is use Google

Major fact-checking organizations and news outlets have examined the high-profile negative ads targeting Democratic U.S. Senate candidate James Talarico and found that the central, most prominent claims are false or highly distorted.

While the ads are often rooted in a real legislative vote or a past public comment, they strip away vital context or rely on outright fabrication to mischaracterize his record.

A breakdown of the prominent claims in these attack ads reveals what is fact versus fiction:

The Claim: He supported taxpayer-funded "sex-change surgeries" for minors

The Context: Multi-million dollar ad campaigns from groups like the GOP-aligned Texas PAC claim Talarico voted to use taxpayer money for gender-reassignment surgeries on young children. The ads point to his vote against Texas Senate Bill 14, which banned gender identity care for people under 18.

The Fact Check: Independent fact-checkers like PolitiFact and CNN determined this claim is false. Voting against the broad bill did not equal supporting taxpayer funding for surgeries. In fact, Talarico voted for failed amendments to the bill that would have banned the surgeries for minors while preserving access to more reversible forms of healthcare, such as hormone therapies. Talarico has publicly stated multiple times that he explicitly opposes gender reassignment surgeries for minors.

The Claim: He was hospitalized at an out-of-state mental health facility

The Context: Viral social media rumors and conservative influencer posts alleged that Talarico suffered a mental health crisis and was secretly receiving treatment at a facility in Ohio after he was not seen on the campaign trail for nine days.

The Fact Check: An Associated Press investigation confirmed this claim is entirely false. The Ohio facility confirmed Talarico was never a patient there. Talarico, who has Type 1 diabetes, was actually recovering at home from a severe bout of the flu. Footage also emerged showing him attending a Texas festival during that timeframe.

The Claim: He is a hypocrite on "dark money" and billionaire influence

The Context: Critics have hit Talaricowho has built his platform around fighting corporate PACs and the influence of the ultrawealthyfor benefiting from dark money himself.

The Fact Check: This claim highlights a real contradiction in modern campaign finance, though Talarico's campaign notes it complies with federal law. While 97% of Talarico's direct campaign contributions come from small-dollar donors, investigative reports by The Texas Tribune revealed that Lone Star Rising PAC (a super PAC boosting his candidacy) has accepted millions from billionaire donors and dark money groups like the Sixteen Thirty Fund. Talarico's campaign has emphasized that federal law strictly prohibits campaigns from coordinating with these outside groups and maintains that he supports outlawing super PACs entirely if elected.

The Claim: His "radical white men" and religious comments

The Context: Ads paid for by the American Political Action Committee (Amerac) and Ken Paxton's campaign highlight past comments from Talarico regarding race, gender, and religion.

The Fact Check: These ads rely on real quotes but strip away their specific policy context to frame him as extreme. For instance, text ads attacking him for calling "radicalized white men" a top domestic terror threat are quoting a statement he made following the 2021 Atlanta spa shootings. That statement directly referenced an official Department of Homeland Security report issued during the Trump administration that reached the same conclusion. Similarly, ads mocking comments he made regarding biology or religion are pulled from contentious Texas House floor debates on social issues.



documented facts...

Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Danielsjackson114 said:

https://freebeacon.com/democrats/we-could-make-prisons-obsolete-james-talarico-called-to-slash-police-budgets-and-spend-the-money-on-social-programs/

Your liberal lunacy is blinding you


"All sail and no anchor".
"I wish I was as cocksure of anything as you are of everything".
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/saradorn/2026/07/16/reid-hoffman-gives-10-million-to-texas-senate-candidate-james-talaricos-campaign/
Keyser Soze
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whoever sends me an unwanted text does not get my vote!
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?


This is what James Talarico is. for
Keyser Soze
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Danielsjackson114 said:



This is what James Talarico is. for

cognitive dissonance
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It has come straight from his mouth, liberal
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JusHappy2BeHere
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Danielsjackson114 said:

It has come straight from his mouth, liberal

Every good thing that has happened in this country from 1776 to today has been accomplished by Liberals over the strenuous, often violent opposition of Conservatives.
"When I despair, I remember that all through history the ways of truth and love have always won. There have been tyrants, and murderers, and for a time they can seem invincible, but in the end they always fall. Think of it--always."

Mahatma Gandhi
Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

JusHappy2BeHere said:

OffshoreBear said:

JusHappy2BeHere said:

OffshoreBear said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

historian said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Robert Wilson said:

Self-destructive pouting is a move.


Pouting is not the right word. PISSED is much more fitting.

My biggest hope is Talarico will be a do nothing Senator. Kinda like Cornyn was.

That's a pipe dream. If Talarico wins and the Dems take the senate they will do as much damage as they can. That's who they are and what they want to do.

The sky is not falling. What you seem to have forgotten is that most all politicians don't keep their campaign promises. This includes Donald Trump. I don't expect Talarico to be any different.

you voted Talafreako?


You voted for a criminal turned in by his own staff, an adulterer divorced by his own wife, a man impeached by his own Party, and a protector of pedophiles?
Pathetic


The Texas Senate acquitted Paxton on every charge. The securities case was dismissed. Staff complaints and a House impeachment still produced zero convictions. That's not a criminal.

The affair and divorce are ugly, no argument. Personal messiness doesn't disqualify someone unless you're ready to empty half of Congress.

"Protector of pedophiles" is pure Talarico campaign sludge over one plea deal after a hung jury. The victim didn't want another trial, so the office cut a deal. Turning that into "he protects pedophiles" is just desperate attack-ad garbage.

Meanwhile you voted for Talarico: pro-trans for kids, anti-2nd Amendment, anti-police, open borders, and higher taxes. That's the actual pathetic choice. I voted for the guy who fights the left instead of the soft-on-crime, soft-on-borders clown running on smears.


Cute. You think aquited means "Not Guilty"
Pro Trans? You mean treating everyone like they are equal citizens of the Republic? Believe it or not, not everyone is a bigot. I'm betting you have never met a Trans person or a Muslim but you are scared ****less of them. You are weak.

Actually, acquitted does mean not guilty. That's how the legal system works. For some people it might be difficult to believe, but there are only two choices. Just like the two sexes (genders).

Of course, not everyone is a bigot. Unfortunately, there still are plenty of bigots in this country, racists, misogynists, haters of Christian's, etc. Usually they are the ones most obsessed by someone's race (or other group identity) and they are always trying to separate people by race or judge people solely on their ethnicity, sex, faith, etc.

Actually, it means "not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt." It most certainly does not mean innocent.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lmao

My goodness, you are a fkn idiot. Liberal
Policies ruin good things. Go look at LA, Seattle, and NY
JusHappy2BeHere
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Danielsjackson114 said:

Lmao

My goodness, you are a fkn idiot. Liberal
Policies ruin good things. Go look at LA, Seattle, and NY

I've been to both LA and Seatltle, and would love to visit New York. Seattle in particular is a great place.

You seem to be extrememely disturbed. It might be time to seek therapy and stay away from the Ragebait conservative blogosphere....
"When I despair, I remember that all through history the ways of truth and love have always won. There have been tyrants, and murderers, and for a time they can seem invincible, but in the end they always fall. Think of it--always."

Mahatma Gandhi
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So open air drug markets, rampant crime, harboring illegals, homelessness, gay pride bs all over the place, along with a list of other liberal sht holes policies is your thing? Really? I have a hard time believing that. No one virtue signals more than a liberal wack job like yourself
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The worst part about liberal clown policies is that they want other people to live and abide by them while not doing it themselves
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



In the usual, exhaustive theme of Democrat projection ... no one every apologizes for hosting a Democrat or otherwise radical LWNJ extremist event ... tells you who are the actual authoritarians.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

historian said:

JusHappy2BeHere said:

OffshoreBear said:

JusHappy2BeHere said:

OffshoreBear said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

historian said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Robert Wilson said:

Self-destructive pouting is a move.


Pouting is not the right word. PISSED is much more fitting.

My biggest hope is Talarico will be a do nothing Senator. Kinda like Cornyn was.

That's a pipe dream. If Talarico wins and the Dems take the senate they will do as much damage as they can. That's who they are and what they want to do.

The sky is not falling. What you seem to have forgotten is that most all politicians don't keep their campaign promises. This includes Donald Trump. I don't expect Talarico to be any different.

you voted Talafreako?


You voted for a criminal turned in by his own staff, an adulterer divorced by his own wife, a man impeached by his own Party, and a protector of pedophiles?
Pathetic


The Texas Senate acquitted Paxton on every charge. The securities case was dismissed. Staff complaints and a House impeachment still produced zero convictions. That's not a criminal.

The affair and divorce are ugly, no argument. Personal messiness doesn't disqualify someone unless you're ready to empty half of Congress.

"Protector of pedophiles" is pure Talarico campaign sludge over one plea deal after a hung jury. The victim didn't want another trial, so the office cut a deal. Turning that into "he protects pedophiles" is just desperate attack-ad garbage.

Meanwhile you voted for Talarico: pro-trans for kids, anti-2nd Amendment, anti-police, open borders, and higher taxes. That's the actual pathetic choice. I voted for the guy who fights the left instead of the soft-on-crime, soft-on-borders clown running on smears.


Cute. You think aquited means "Not Guilty"
Pro Trans? You mean treating everyone like they are equal citizens of the Republic? Believe it or not, not everyone is a bigot. I'm betting you have never met a Trans person or a Muslim but you are scared ****less of them. You are weak.

Actually, acquitted does mean not guilty. That's how the legal system works. For some people it might be difficult to believe, but there are only two choices. Just like the two sexes (genders).

Of course, not everyone is a bigot. Unfortunately, there still are plenty of bigots in this country, racists, misogynists, haters of Christian's, etc. Usually they are the ones most obsessed by someone's race (or other group identity) and they are always trying to separate people by race or judge people solely on their ethnicity, sex, faith, etc.

Actually, it means "not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt." It most certainly does not mean innocent.

Words have meaning. This is the correct way to think about it.

"Not Guilty" is a legal term. It represents the finding of a jury (or judge).

"Innocent" is a - not sure the right term - but for lack of a better word a moral or "actual" term. Lots of people who are not innocent have been found "not guilty."
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JusHappy2BeHere said:

Danielsjackson114 said:

It has come straight from his mouth, liberal

Every good thing that has happened in this country from 1776 to today has been accomplished by Liberals over the strenuous, often violent opposition of Conservatives.


Well, that's not true at all, taking the modern use of the word 'liberal'. Ironically, the most genuine practice of big L Liberal concepts has been by Conservative leaders.

Democrats have been evil 80+ percent of the time, and over 95% of current Democrats would be reviled by all of our nation's Founders.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
More to the point, an acquittal means the accusation is not proved.

Lies by the Left are of course common and convenient for them during election campaigns.
Aliceinbubbleland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Danielsjackson114 said:

The worst part about liberal clown policies is that they want other people to live and abide by them while not doing it themselves

Oh the irony
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't want illegals, rampant crime, gay pride bs, open air drug markets, homelessness and all other liberal wack job policies so how is that ironic. I want the opposite which is what republicans are for

And truthfully, you do too
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank has completely lost it like most liberal wack jobs on here
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You used the term "innocent", not I. However, legally the result is the same. If a court declares someone not guilty of a crime the case is closed.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

JusHappy2BeHere said:

Danielsjackson114 said:

It has come straight from his mouth, liberal

Every good thing that has happened in this country from 1776 to today has been accomplished by Liberals over the strenuous, often violent opposition of Conservatives.


Well, that's not true at all, taking the modern use of the word 'liberal'. Ironically, the most genuine practice of big L Liberal concepts has been by Conservative leaders.

Democrats have been evil 80+ percent of the time, and over 95% of current Democrats would be reviled by all of our nation's Founders.

The problem is that "liberal" and "conservative" generally are not used accurately. In fact, what is usually labeled "conservative" today is actually classical liberalism. Key principles of this include limited government (its powers and responsibilities are greatly reduced), representative government with elected leaders held accountable, individual liberty with moral responsibility, economic liberty aka capitalism, equality (no privileged elites), the rule of law, and so on. These ideas are expressed eloquently in the Declaration of Independence and embodied in the Constitution.

Modern "conservative" are essentially in agreement with the Founding Fathers. They are only "conservative" in the sense that they want to conserve or protect America so that every citizen can enjoy its heritage and promise and(the American dream). The Left today is the opposite in almost every way as committed Marxists who seek to destroy what we have so they can have power.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JusHappy2BeHere said:

Danielsjackson114 said:

It has come straight from his mouth, liberal

Every good thing that has happened in this country from 1776 to today has been accomplished by Liberals over the strenuous, often violent opposition of Conservatives.

Thank you for the hearty belly laugh needed after another **** the bed game ... against the chickens no less.
JusHappy2BeHere
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

JusHappy2BeHere said:

Danielsjackson114 said:

It has come straight from his mouth, liberal

Every good thing that has happened in this country from 1776 to today has been accomplished by Liberals over the strenuous, often violent opposition of Conservatives.

Thank you for the hearty belly laugh needed after another **** the bed game ... against the chickens no less.


The American Revolution: Challenged the divine right of kings to establish a constitutional republic based on Enlightenment ideals of liberty and self-governance.
The Bill of Rights: Secured explicit protections for individual liberties, freedom of speech, and religious freedom against government overreach.
The Abolitionist Movement: Led the moral and political fight to end chattel slavery, culminating in the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments.

Political and Democratic Reforms

Women's Suffrage: Organized decades of activism resulting in the 19th Amendment, which granted women the right to vote.
Direct Election of Senators: Passed the 17th Amendment to reduce corruption by allowing citizens, rather than state legislatures, to vote for U.S. Senators.
The Voting Rights Act of 1965: Dismantled systemic legal barriers, such as poll taxes and literacy tests, that prevented Black Americans from exercising their right to vote.

Labor and Economic Protections

The New Deal: Established the modern American safety net during the Great Depression, introducing Social Security, unemployment insurance, and federal jobs programs.
Labor Rights: Secured the 40-hour workweek, minimum wage standards, overtime pay, and the legal right to unionize through the Fair Labor Standards Act.
Consumer Protection: Created the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to ensure product safety and prevent corporate monopolies.

Social Safety Net and Infrastructure

Great Society Programs: Created Medicare and Medicaid to provide healthcare for the elderly and low-income families, alongside launching Head Start for early childhood education.
Civil Rights Act of 1964: Outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in public accommodations and employment.
The Affordable Care Act (ACA): Expanded healthcare coverage to millions of uninsured Americans and prohibited insurance companies from denying coverage for pre-existing conditions.

Environmental and Consumer Safety

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Established federal oversight to regulate pollution, leading to the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act.
National Parks Expansion: Championed the conservation of public lands and wildlife under the progressive policies of the early 20th century.
"When I despair, I remember that all through history the ways of truth and love have always won. There have been tyrants, and murderers, and for a time they can seem invincible, but in the end they always fall. Think of it--always."

Mahatma Gandhi
Keyser Soze
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The expansion of the power in the executive branch does not follow the founding fathers.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Divine Right of Kings was challenged long before the American Revolution. The English engaged in a decades long struggle between king and Parliament, fought a civil war, beheaded a king (1649), and finally settled the matter with the Glorious Revolution (1688). Parliament deposed and kicked out the king then invited new monarchs to replace him. This was followed by the Bill of Rights (1689) which guaranteed basic liberties to all Englishmen and limited the powers of the monarchy.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.