You're dodging, as expected.Rawhide said:Watch the video. You said that cops didn't let people in, the video shows different. You're trying to reframe the argument, once again. I'm not biting.Sam Lowry said:Let's cut the sophistry and settle the question once and for all. Do you contend that the authorities willingly let rioters into the Capitol?Rawhide said:He said that cops didn't let people in. I provided a video that in fact show cops let people in.Osodecentx said:Watch the video. If you continue to say Capitol police let rioters in, you're dishonest. 3 hours of videoRawhide said:Like I said, nothing but dishonesty from you. Can't admit when you're wrongSam Lowry said:Fallacy of equivocation. They may have "let" the mob in, but they didn't let the mob in.Rawhide said:The only one being dishonest here samuel, is you. Even when presented with video evidence of cops letting people into the capitol, you still tried to argue against. The same thing with the fact that Covid has a very very very high survival rate amone young peopleSam Lowry said:You're doing nothing but flaunting your own dishonesty when you repeat the "red carpet" talking point over and over. Even your side doesn't believe its own rhetoric.Rawhide said:Kind of like how you never accepted the fact that cops let people into the Capitol building or children in school don't need masks because the Covid survival rate is so damn high for these children... survival higher than the flu, kind of like that?Sam Lowry said:
Trump's enemies tried to hold him responsible for J6 via impeachment, but his allies weren't having it. Y'all won't accept the obvious until the feds connect every little dot. So they're connecting the dots.
The Justice Department this week released a three-hour video of a battle between rioters and the police at the US Capitol Building on January 6 where rioters brandished weapons, officers were viciously beaten, and a member of the mob died on Capitol steps.
The assault on the Lower West Terrace was one of the most violent confrontations between Capitol Police and the crowd. Officers held the line until the building was cleared without letting rioters inside. Some officers have since said they did not know the Capitol had already been breached in other areas.
The video, taken from a Capitol security camera, does not have sound. It starts as officers retreat, helping each other as they stumble inside and washing their eyes out with water from chemical spray. Rioters crowd in behind them, coordinate efforts to attack and push through in infamous moments that have haunted the public, and officers, ever since.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/24/politics/january-6-video-capitol-hill-riot/index.html
Once again OSO, read my post carefully. I said cops let people in. I DID NOT say cops let everyone in.
Samuel back whenever he posted his BS, said cops didn't let people in. He was just wrong or he was lying. I showed evidence to the contrary, and today still tries to argue against it. He's not capable of admitting when he's wrong. He's a rube.
But let's settle it... did the cops let people or not Samuel?
FBI raids Trump's home
151,545 Views |
2081 Replies |
Last: 3 yr ago by Harrison Bergeron
bummer, maybe you have weak sources..Sam Lowry said:I didn't see anything about NARA issues with Obama or Hillary. Someone posted a tweet about FOIA, but nothing related to this.4th and Inches said:very true.. also has no enforcement penaltySam Lowry said:The PRA applies to all documentary material, classified or not.Oldbear83 said:If Trump declassified the documents, then he committed no crime no manner how you spin it, Oso.Osodecentx said:Did he declassify the documents he illegally took?Oldbear83 said:Never occurred to you that as President, Trump had the authority to declassify documents?LateSteak69 said:Donald Trump signed a law that might’ve turned himself into a felon. Brilliant. pic.twitter.com/NgsbHSHSpK
— Jason Selvig (@jasonselvig) August 10, 2022
And no, Hillary never had that power, so another swing and miss from the roadkill poster.
Its super fun to read about the way the NARA and DOJ handled Obama and Hillary vs this one..
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”
Jon Stewart
Jon Stewart
You''re the one dodging doofus. You're trying to reframe the argument as usual.Sam Lowry said:You're dodging, as expected.Rawhide said:Watch the video. You said that cops didn't let people in, the video shows different. You're trying to reframe the argument, once again. I'm not biting.Sam Lowry said:Let's cut the sophistry and settle the question once and for all. Do you contend that the authorities willingly let rioters into the Capitol?Rawhide said:He said that cops didn't let people in. I provided a video that in fact show cops let people in.Osodecentx said:Watch the video. If you continue to say Capitol police let rioters in, you're dishonest. 3 hours of videoRawhide said:Like I said, nothing but dishonesty from you. Can't admit when you're wrongSam Lowry said:Fallacy of equivocation. They may have "let" the mob in, but they didn't let the mob in.Rawhide said:The only one being dishonest here samuel, is you. Even when presented with video evidence of cops letting people into the capitol, you still tried to argue against. The same thing with the fact that Covid has a very very very high survival rate amone young peopleSam Lowry said:You're doing nothing but flaunting your own dishonesty when you repeat the "red carpet" talking point over and over. Even your side doesn't believe its own rhetoric.Rawhide said:Kind of like how you never accepted the fact that cops let people into the Capitol building or children in school don't need masks because the Covid survival rate is so damn high for these children... survival higher than the flu, kind of like that?Sam Lowry said:
Trump's enemies tried to hold him responsible for J6 via impeachment, but his allies weren't having it. Y'all won't accept the obvious until the feds connect every little dot. So they're connecting the dots.
The Justice Department this week released a three-hour video of a battle between rioters and the police at the US Capitol Building on January 6 where rioters brandished weapons, officers were viciously beaten, and a member of the mob died on Capitol steps.
The assault on the Lower West Terrace was one of the most violent confrontations between Capitol Police and the crowd. Officers held the line until the building was cleared without letting rioters inside. Some officers have since said they did not know the Capitol had already been breached in other areas.
The video, taken from a Capitol security camera, does not have sound. It starts as officers retreat, helping each other as they stumble inside and washing their eyes out with water from chemical spray. Rioters crowd in behind them, coordinate efforts to attack and push through in infamous moments that have haunted the public, and officers, ever since.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/24/politics/january-6-video-capitol-hill-riot/index.html
Once again OSO, read my post carefully. I said cops let people in. I DID NOT say cops let everyone in.
Samuel back whenever he posted his BS, said cops didn't let people in. He was just wrong or he was lying. I showed evidence to the contrary, and today still tries to argue against it. He's not capable of admitting when he's wrong. He's a rube.
But let's settle it... did the cops let people or not Samuel?
Still can't man up and admit you're wrong, I see.
I know I do. I'm reading SicEm R&P!4th and Inches said:bummer, maybe you have weak sources..Sam Lowry said:I didn't see anything about NARA issues with Obama or Hillary. Someone posted a tweet about FOIA, but nothing related to this.4th and Inches said:very true.. also has no enforcement penaltySam Lowry said:The PRA applies to all documentary material, classified or not.Oldbear83 said:If Trump declassified the documents, then he committed no crime no manner how you spin it, Oso.Osodecentx said:Did he declassify the documents he illegally took?Oldbear83 said:Never occurred to you that as President, Trump had the authority to declassify documents?LateSteak69 said:Donald Trump signed a law that might’ve turned himself into a felon. Brilliant. pic.twitter.com/NgsbHSHSpK
— Jason Selvig (@jasonselvig) August 10, 2022
And no, Hillary never had that power, so another swing and miss from the roadkill poster.
Its super fun to read about the way the NARA and DOJ handled Obama and Hillary vs this one..
You'll be voting for the Dear Leader. No doubt about itRawhide said:Try again dumbass, I'll be voting for Ron DeSantis in the primary; I've said as much more than once.Osodecentx said:No, the Left wants the weak minded to nominate Trump for the Republican nomination for president. Here's a conspiracy theory for you; Democrats are manipulating youRawhide said:It may also be that the left wants to just create another narrative about orange man bad to hurt is 2024 bid. Since we're engaging in conjecture and everythingOsodecentx said:Trump's legal team was given a copy of the warrant. It has declined to release it, one source told NBC News's Vaughn Hillyard, because "the burden of transparency rests with the [Justice Department] to lay out its reasoning." Since the warrant also includes an articulation of the potential legal violations to which the search relates, it may also be the case that Trump's team wants to avoid revealing the scope of the legal threat Trump faces.Oldbear83 said:
"Trump isn't releasing what he was served with."
His lawyers are saying they were not given a copy of the warrant. Said the agents flashed a paper then shoved in.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/08/10/trump-fbi-search/
BTW, it's working
The lefty Trump haters have you so brainwashed and triggered over big bad Don, you're unable to comprehend posts in a consistent manner. You don't know if you should scratch your watch or wind your ass
This helps your Dear LeaderRawhide said:It may also be that the left wants to just create another narrative about orange man bad to hurt is 2024 bid. Since we're engaging in conjecture and everythingOsodecentx said:Trump's legal team was given a copy of the warrant. It has declined to release it, one source told NBC News's Vaughn Hillyard, because "the burden of transparency rests with the [Justice Department] to lay out its reasoning." Since the warrant also includes an articulation of the potential legal violations to which the search relates, it may also be the case that Trump's team wants to avoid revealing the scope of the legal threat Trump faces.Oldbear83 said:
"Trump isn't releasing what he was served with."
His lawyers are saying they were not given a copy of the warrant. Said the agents flashed a paper then shoved in.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/08/10/trump-fbi-search/
New @trafalgar_group/@COSProject #poll shows 70.4% of Americans say #Trump #FBIRaid has increased motivation to vote in 2022.
— The Trafalgar Group (@trafalgar_group) August 10, 2022
76.7% of #GOP and 53.9% in #Inds say Trump’s political enemies behind the raid as opposed to impartial justice system.
Report :https://t.co/gYgaaBCrEU… pic.twitter.com/KqlPPB7YdZ
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”
Jon Stewart
Jon Stewart
It means, contrary to your assertions, that the Trump team has a copy of the warrantOldbear83 said:WaPo sides with Biden and Sam.Osodecentx said:Trump's legal team was given a copy of the warrant. It has declined to release it, one source told NBC News's Vaughn Hillyard, because "the burden of transparency rests with the [Justice Department] to lay out its reasoning." Since the warrant also includes an articulation of the potential legal violations to which the search relates, it may also be the case that Trump's team wants to avoid revealing the scope of the legal threat Trump faces.Oldbear83 said:
"Trump isn't releasing what he was served with."
His lawyers are saying they were not given a copy of the warrant. Said the agents flashed a paper then shoved in.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/08/10/trump-fbi-search/
I notice no name for their "source".
Means jack
you really love those no name sources.. you got a pic of the mail clerk on your wall? Senior whitehouse official! LoLOsodecentx said:It means, contrary to your assertions, that the Trump team has a copy of the warrantOldbear83 said:WaPo sides with Biden and Sam.Osodecentx said:Trump's legal team was given a copy of the warrant. It has declined to release it, one source told NBC News's Vaughn Hillyard, because "the burden of transparency rests with the [Justice Department] to lay out its reasoning." Since the warrant also includes an articulation of the potential legal violations to which the search relates, it may also be the case that Trump's team wants to avoid revealing the scope of the legal threat Trump faces.Oldbear83 said:
"Trump isn't releasing what he was served with."
His lawyers are saying they were not given a copy of the warrant. Said the agents flashed a paper then shoved in.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/08/10/trump-fbi-search/
I notice no name for their "source".
Means jack
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”
Jon Stewart
Jon Stewart
Did your Dear Leader declassify all of the classified documents a Mar a Lago while he was POTUS?Oldbear83 said:If Trump declassified the documents, then he committed no crime no manner how you spin it, Oso.Osodecentx said:Did he declassify the documents he illegally took?Oldbear83 said:Never occurred to you that as President, Trump had the authority to declassify documents?LateSteak69 said:Donald Trump signed a law that might’ve turned himself into a felon. Brilliant. pic.twitter.com/NgsbHSHSpK
— Jason Selvig (@jasonselvig) August 10, 2022
And no, Hillary never had that power, so another swing and miss from the roadkill poster.
And in case you imagine those documents were stamped 'CLASSIFIED' like you see in movies and TV, that's not how this works.
Funny to see Sam's hypocrisy play out again.Sam Lowry said:You're dodging, as expected.Rawhide said:Watch the video. You said that cops didn't let people in, the video shows different. You're trying to reframe the argument, once again. I'm not biting.Sam Lowry said:Let's cut the sophistry and settle the question once and for all. Do you contend that the authorities willingly let rioters into the Capitol?Rawhide said:He said that cops didn't let people in. I provided a video that in fact show cops let people in.Osodecentx said:Watch the video. If you continue to say Capitol police let rioters in, you're dishonest. 3 hours of videoRawhide said:Like I said, nothing but dishonesty from you. Can't admit when you're wrongSam Lowry said:Fallacy of equivocation. They may have "let" the mob in, but they didn't let the mob in.Rawhide said:The only one being dishonest here samuel, is you. Even when presented with video evidence of cops letting people into the capitol, you still tried to argue against. The same thing with the fact that Covid has a very very very high survival rate amone young peopleSam Lowry said:You're doing nothing but flaunting your own dishonesty when you repeat the "red carpet" talking point over and over. Even your side doesn't believe its own rhetoric.Rawhide said:Kind of like how you never accepted the fact that cops let people into the Capitol building or children in school don't need masks because the Covid survival rate is so damn high for these children... survival higher than the flu, kind of like that?Sam Lowry said:
Trump's enemies tried to hold him responsible for J6 via impeachment, but his allies weren't having it. Y'all won't accept the obvious until the feds connect every little dot. So they're connecting the dots.
The Justice Department this week released a three-hour video of a battle between rioters and the police at the US Capitol Building on January 6 where rioters brandished weapons, officers were viciously beaten, and a member of the mob died on Capitol steps.
The assault on the Lower West Terrace was one of the most violent confrontations between Capitol Police and the crowd. Officers held the line until the building was cleared without letting rioters inside. Some officers have since said they did not know the Capitol had already been breached in other areas.
The video, taken from a Capitol security camera, does not have sound. It starts as officers retreat, helping each other as they stumble inside and washing their eyes out with water from chemical spray. Rioters crowd in behind them, coordinate efforts to attack and push through in infamous moments that have haunted the public, and officers, ever since.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/24/politics/january-6-video-capitol-hill-riot/index.html
Once again OSO, read my post carefully. I said cops let people in. I DID NOT say cops let everyone in.
Samuel back whenever he posted his BS, said cops didn't let people in. He was just wrong or he was lying. I showed evidence to the contrary, and today still tries to argue against it. He's not capable of admitting when he's wrong. He's a rube.
But let's settle it... did the cops let people or not Samuel?
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
You seem uneasy, Oso.Osodecentx said:Did your Dear Leader declassify all of the classified documents a Mar a Lago while he was POTUS?Oldbear83 said:If Trump declassified the documents, then he committed no crime no manner how you spin it, Oso.Osodecentx said:Did he declassify the documents he illegally took?Oldbear83 said:Never occurred to you that as President, Trump had the authority to declassify documents?LateSteak69 said:Donald Trump signed a law that might’ve turned himself into a felon. Brilliant. pic.twitter.com/NgsbHSHSpK
— Jason Selvig (@jasonselvig) August 10, 2022
And no, Hillary never had that power, so another swing and miss from the roadkill poster.
And in case you imagine those documents were stamped 'CLASSIFIED' like you see in movies and TV, that's not how this works.
Is your scheme falling apart already?
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
I don't take the Fifth like Dear leaderOldbear83 said:You seem uneasy, Oso.Osodecentx said:Did your Dear Leader declassify all of the classified documents a Mar a Lago while he was POTUS?Oldbear83 said:If Trump declassified the documents, then he committed no crime no manner how you spin it, Oso.Osodecentx said:Did he declassify the documents he illegally took?Oldbear83 said:Never occurred to you that as President, Trump had the authority to declassify documents?LateSteak69 said:Donald Trump signed a law that might’ve turned himself into a felon. Brilliant. pic.twitter.com/NgsbHSHSpK
— Jason Selvig (@jasonselvig) August 10, 2022
And no, Hillary never had that power, so another swing and miss from the roadkill poster.
And in case you imagine those documents were stamped 'CLASSIFIED' like you see in movies and TV, that's not how this works.
Is your scheme falling apart already?
You are the weak minded who will get him nominated for 2024, just like Dems want
The relevant part is whether he. through his lawyers, was presented a copy of the warrant at the time of the search, as required by law.Osodecentx said:It means, contrary to your assertions, that the Trump team has a copy of the warrantOldbear83 said:WaPo sides with Biden and Sam.Osodecentx said:Trump's legal team was given a copy of the warrant. It has declined to release it, one source told NBC News's Vaughn Hillyard, because "the burden of transparency rests with the [Justice Department] to lay out its reasoning." Since the warrant also includes an articulation of the potential legal violations to which the search relates, it may also be the case that Trump's team wants to avoid revealing the scope of the legal threat Trump faces.Oldbear83 said:
"Trump isn't releasing what he was served with."
His lawyers are saying they were not given a copy of the warrant. Said the agents flashed a paper then shoved in.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/08/10/trump-fbi-search/
I notice no name for their "source".
Means jack
I wonder if WaPo's "source" will turn out to be the mail room guy or someone from The View.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Yeah, sure okay cupcakeOsodecentx said:You'll be voting for the Dear Leader. No doubt about itRawhide said:Try again dumbass, I'll be voting for Ron DeSantis in the primary; I've said as much more than once.Osodecentx said:No, the Left wants the weak minded to nominate Trump for the Republican nomination for president. Here's a conspiracy theory for you; Democrats are manipulating youRawhide said:It may also be that the left wants to just create another narrative about orange man bad to hurt is 2024 bid. Since we're engaging in conjecture and everythingOsodecentx said:Trump's legal team was given a copy of the warrant. It has declined to release it, one source told NBC News's Vaughn Hillyard, because "the burden of transparency rests with the [Justice Department] to lay out its reasoning." Since the warrant also includes an articulation of the potential legal violations to which the search relates, it may also be the case that Trump's team wants to avoid revealing the scope of the legal threat Trump faces.Oldbear83 said:
"Trump isn't releasing what he was served with."
His lawyers are saying they were not given a copy of the warrant. Said the agents flashed a paper then shoved in.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/08/10/trump-fbi-search/
BTW, it's working
The lefty Trump haters have you so brainwashed and triggered over big bad Don, you're unable to comprehend posts in a consistent manner. You don't know if you should scratch your watch or wind your ass
Yup, Oso has gone squirmy and sweaty, like Hunter when he first heard about a search warrant.Osodecentx said:I don't take the Fifth like Dear leaderOldbear83 said:You seem uneasy, Oso.Osodecentx said:Did your Dear Leader declassify all of the classified documents a Mar a Lago while he was POTUS?Oldbear83 said:If Trump declassified the documents, then he committed no crime no manner how you spin it, Oso.Osodecentx said:Did he declassify the documents he illegally took?Oldbear83 said:Never occurred to you that as President, Trump had the authority to declassify documents?LateSteak69 said:Donald Trump signed a law that might’ve turned himself into a felon. Brilliant. pic.twitter.com/NgsbHSHSpK
— Jason Selvig (@jasonselvig) August 10, 2022
And no, Hillary never had that power, so another swing and miss from the roadkill poster.
And in case you imagine those documents were stamped 'CLASSIFIED' like you see in movies and TV, that's not how this works.
Is your scheme falling apart already?
You are the weak minded who will get him nominated for 2024, just like Dems want
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Conjecture in "news" reporting is lost on you, I see.Osodecentx said:This helps your Dear LeaderRawhide said:It may also be that the left wants to just create another narrative about orange man bad to hurt is 2024 bid. Since we're engaging in conjecture and everythingOsodecentx said:Trump's legal team was given a copy of the warrant. It has declined to release it, one source told NBC News's Vaughn Hillyard, because "the burden of transparency rests with the [Justice Department] to lay out its reasoning." Since the warrant also includes an articulation of the potential legal violations to which the search relates, it may also be the case that Trump's team wants to avoid revealing the scope of the legal threat Trump faces.Oldbear83 said:
"Trump isn't releasing what he was served with."
His lawyers are saying they were not given a copy of the warrant. Said the agents flashed a paper then shoved in.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/08/10/trump-fbi-search/
shown and allowed to read the unsealed part, no copy was presented according to cited sources.Oldbear83 said:The relevant part is whether he. through his lawyers, was presented a copy of the warrant at the time of the search, as required by law.Osodecentx said:It means, contrary to your assertions, that the Trump team has a copy of the warrantOldbear83 said:WaPo sides with Biden and Sam.Osodecentx said:Trump's legal team was given a copy of the warrant. It has declined to release it, one source told NBC News's Vaughn Hillyard, because "the burden of transparency rests with the [Justice Department] to lay out its reasoning." Since the warrant also includes an articulation of the potential legal violations to which the search relates, it may also be the case that Trump's team wants to avoid revealing the scope of the legal threat Trump faces.Oldbear83 said:
"Trump isn't releasing what he was served with."
His lawyers are saying they were not given a copy of the warrant. Said the agents flashed a paper then shoved in.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/08/10/trump-fbi-search/
I notice no name for their "source".
Means jack
I wonder if WaPo's "source" will turn out to be the mail room guy or someone from The View.
A copy was presented according to unnamed source.
Who to beleive, who to beleive..
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”
Jon Stewart
Jon Stewart
Old Fifth Amendment Leader has your loyalty to the bitter endOldbear83 said:Yup, Oso has gone squirmy and sweaty, like Hunter when he first heard about a search warrant.Osodecentx said:I don't take the Fifth like Dear leaderOldbear83 said:You seem uneasy, Oso.Osodecentx said:Did your Dear Leader declassify all of the classified documents a Mar a Lago while he was POTUS?Oldbear83 said:If Trump declassified the documents, then he committed no crime no manner how you spin it, Oso.Osodecentx said:Did he declassify the documents he illegally took?Oldbear83 said:Never occurred to you that as President, Trump had the authority to declassify documents?LateSteak69 said:Donald Trump signed a law that might’ve turned himself into a felon. Brilliant. pic.twitter.com/NgsbHSHSpK
— Jason Selvig (@jasonselvig) August 10, 2022
And no, Hillary never had that power, so another swing and miss from the roadkill poster.
And in case you imagine those documents were stamped 'CLASSIFIED' like you see in movies and TV, that's not how this works.
Is your scheme falling apart already?
You are the weak minded who will get him nominated for 2024, just like Dems want
Oh look, the FBI doing dumb stuff again..(not Trump related but applies)
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”
Jon Stewart
Jon Stewart
What's wrong, Oso? Trump your boogey man?Osodecentx said:Old Fifth Amendment Leader has your loyalty to the bitter endOldbear83 said:Yup, Oso has gone squirmy and sweaty, like Hunter when he first heard about a search warrant.Osodecentx said:I don't take the Fifth like Dear leaderOldbear83 said:You seem uneasy, Oso.Osodecentx said:Did your Dear Leader declassify all of the classified documents a Mar a Lago while he was POTUS?Oldbear83 said:If Trump declassified the documents, then he committed no crime no manner how you spin it, Oso.Osodecentx said:Did he declassify the documents he illegally took?Oldbear83 said:Never occurred to you that as President, Trump had the authority to declassify documents?LateSteak69 said:Donald Trump signed a law that might’ve turned himself into a felon. Brilliant. pic.twitter.com/NgsbHSHSpK
— Jason Selvig (@jasonselvig) August 10, 2022
And no, Hillary never had that power, so another swing and miss from the roadkill poster.
And in case you imagine those documents were stamped 'CLASSIFIED' like you see in movies and TV, that's not how this works.
Is your scheme falling apart already?
You are the weak minded who will get him nominated for 2024, just like Dems want
He's your Dear Leader and you'll vote for himRawhide said:What's wrong, Oso? Trump your boogey man?Osodecentx said:Old Fifth Amendment Leader has your loyalty to the bitter endOldbear83 said:Yup, Oso has gone squirmy and sweaty, like Hunter when he first heard about a search warrant.Osodecentx said:I don't take the Fifth like Dear leaderOldbear83 said:You seem uneasy, Oso.Osodecentx said:Did your Dear Leader declassify all of the classified documents a Mar a Lago while he was POTUS?Oldbear83 said:If Trump declassified the documents, then he committed no crime no manner how you spin it, Oso.Osodecentx said:Did he declassify the documents he illegally took?Oldbear83 said:Never occurred to you that as President, Trump had the authority to declassify documents?LateSteak69 said:Donald Trump signed a law that might’ve turned himself into a felon. Brilliant. pic.twitter.com/NgsbHSHSpK
— Jason Selvig (@jasonselvig) August 10, 2022
And no, Hillary never had that power, so another swing and miss from the roadkill poster.
And in case you imagine those documents were stamped 'CLASSIFIED' like you see in movies and TV, that's not how this works.
Is your scheme falling apart already?
You are the weak minded who will get him nominated for 2024, just like Dems want
He's your boogey, got you all tied in knots.Osodecentx said:He's your Dear Leader and you'll vote for himRawhide said:What's wrong, Oso? Trump your boogey man?Osodecentx said:Old Fifth Amendment Leader has your loyalty to the bitter endOldbear83 said:Yup, Oso has gone squirmy and sweaty, like Hunter when he first heard about a search warrant.Osodecentx said:I don't take the Fifth like Dear leaderOldbear83 said:You seem uneasy, Oso.Osodecentx said:Did your Dear Leader declassify all of the classified documents a Mar a Lago while he was POTUS?Oldbear83 said:If Trump declassified the documents, then he committed no crime no manner how you spin it, Oso.Osodecentx said:Did he declassify the documents he illegally took?Oldbear83 said:Never occurred to you that as President, Trump had the authority to declassify documents?LateSteak69 said:Donald Trump signed a law that might’ve turned himself into a felon. Brilliant. pic.twitter.com/NgsbHSHSpK
— Jason Selvig (@jasonselvig) August 10, 2022
And no, Hillary never had that power, so another swing and miss from the roadkill poster.
And in case you imagine those documents were stamped 'CLASSIFIED' like you see in movies and TV, that's not how this works.
Is your scheme falling apart already?
You are the weak minded who will get him nominated for 2024, just like Dems want
Geesh Osa, you really are an idiot
FBI faking reports on domestic terrorists? I am shocked..
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”
Jon Stewart
Jon Stewart
"Merrick Garland, Chris Wray come to the House judiciary Committee this Friday and answer our questions about this action, which has never happened in American history." House judiciary has requested some answers
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”
Jon Stewart
Jon Stewart
Well, Jordan wrote a letter, it is so4th and Inches said:
FBI faking reports on domestic terrorists? I am shocked..
You oppose Americans using their Constitutional rights.Osodecentx said:Old Fifth Amendment Leader has your loyalty to the bitter endOldbear83 said:Yup, Oso has gone squirmy and sweaty, like Hunter when he first heard about a search warrant.Osodecentx said:I don't take the Fifth like Dear leaderOldbear83 said:You seem uneasy, Oso.Osodecentx said:Did your Dear Leader declassify all of the classified documents a Mar a Lago while he was POTUS?Oldbear83 said:If Trump declassified the documents, then he committed no crime no manner how you spin it, Oso.Osodecentx said:Did he declassify the documents he illegally took?Oldbear83 said:Never occurred to you that as President, Trump had the authority to declassify documents?LateSteak69 said:Donald Trump signed a law that might’ve turned himself into a felon. Brilliant. pic.twitter.com/NgsbHSHSpK
— Jason Selvig (@jasonselvig) August 10, 2022
And no, Hillary never had that power, so another swing and miss from the roadkill poster.
And in case you imagine those documents were stamped 'CLASSIFIED' like you see in movies and TV, that's not how this works.
Is your scheme falling apart already?
You are the weak minded who will get him nominated for 2024, just like Dems want
Noted.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Osodecentx said:Well, Jordan wrote a letter, it is so4th and Inches said:
FBI faking reports on domestic terrorists? I am shocked..
Thought you would like it, it has an unnamed source!
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”
Jon Stewart
Jon Stewart
I am old enough to remember the audit by DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz in which he clearly states FBI warrants were "not valid".
He found the FBI repeatedly violates Woods Procedures and lies to get warrants.
He found the FBI repeatedly violates Woods Procedures and lies to get warrants.
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”
Jon Stewart
Jon Stewart
Dear Leader did.Oldbear83 said:You oppose Americans using their Constitutional rights.Osodecentx said:Old Fifth Amendment Leader has your loyalty to the bitter endOldbear83 said:Yup, Oso has gone squirmy and sweaty, like Hunter when he first heard about a search warrant.Osodecentx said:I don't take the Fifth like Dear leaderOldbear83 said:You seem uneasy, Oso.Osodecentx said:Did your Dear Leader declassify all of the classified documents a Mar a Lago while he was POTUS?Oldbear83 said:If Trump declassified the documents, then he committed no crime no manner how you spin it, Oso.Osodecentx said:Did he declassify the documents he illegally took?Oldbear83 said:Never occurred to you that as President, Trump had the authority to declassify documents?LateSteak69 said:Donald Trump signed a law that might’ve turned himself into a felon. Brilliant. pic.twitter.com/NgsbHSHSpK
— Jason Selvig (@jasonselvig) August 10, 2022
And no, Hillary never had that power, so another swing and miss from the roadkill poster.
And in case you imagine those documents were stamped 'CLASSIFIED' like you see in movies and TV, that's not how this works.
Is your scheme falling apart already?
You are the weak minded who will get him nominated for 2024, just like Dems want
Noted.
'If you're innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?' Trump's position on declining to testify has changed over time.
Over the years, former President Donald J. Trump has generally criticized other politicians for taking the Fifth Amendment. But on Wednesday, he invoked the right himself during a deposition at the office of the New York attorney general, and it wasn't the first time.
Mr. Trump previously contended that invoking one's Fifth Amendment rights was virtually an admission of wrongdoing.
"So there are five people taking the Fifth Amendment, like you see on the mob, right? You see the mob takes the Fifth. If you're innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?" Mr. Trump said at a rally in Iowa in 2016, referring to investigations into Hillary Clinton's handling of potentially classified material as secretary of state.
Soon after, at a presidential debate, Mr. Trump doubled down on criticizing Ms. Clinton for using a private email server as secretary of state, again referencing the Fifth Amendment. "When you have your staff taking the Fifth Amendment, taking the Fifth, so they're not prosecuted, when you have the man that set up the illegal server taking the Fifth, I think it's disgraceful," he said.
Yet in 1998, he suggested that President Bill Clinton should have done just that during the impeachment investigation into Clinton. "It's a terrible thing for a president to take the Fifth Amendment, but he probably should have done it. I don't think he could have done any worse than what's happened," Trump said.
On Wednesday, Mr. Trump was singing a different tune, however, when he arrived at the New York attorney general's office in downtown Manhattan to give sworn testimony for a civil inquiry into his business practices.
In a statement emailed just before the questioning started, Mr. Trump acknowledged his shifting positions over the years, but said circumstances had changed. He portrayed himself as the victim of politically motivated investigations, not just by the New York attorney general, but by the Justice Department and other prosecutors who he asserted "have lost all moral and ethical bounds of decency."
"I once asked, 'If you're innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?'" he wrote. "Now I know the answer to that question. When your family, your company, and all the people in your orbit have become the targets of an unfounded, politically motivated Witch Hunt supported by lawyers, prosecutors, and the Fake News Media, you have no choice."
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/10/nyregion/trump-fifth-amendment-comments.html
Trump emerged from the question-and-non-answer session with praise for the "very professional" way Attorney General Letitia James's team handled the meeting, in which he refused more than 400 times to answer questions about his businesses, property valuations and loans, according to a person with knowledge of the discussion.
Actually it's not relevant to Oso's original point, which was that Trump isn't releasing what he has. You changed the subject to the FBI's so-called "abusing rights" by not showing the warrant during the search -- an abuse which has never been alleged by Trump's lawyers or anyone else. If you'd bothered to read the interviews instead of crying foul at the first sight of a legitimate news link, you'd know Christina Bobb was quoted saying the opposite.Oldbear83 said:The relevant part is whether he. through his lawyers, was presented a copy of the warrant at the time of the search, as required by law.Osodecentx said:It means, contrary to your assertions, that the Trump team has a copy of the warrantOldbear83 said:WaPo sides with Biden and Sam.Osodecentx said:Trump's legal team was given a copy of the warrant. It has declined to release it, one source told NBC News's Vaughn Hillyard, because "the burden of transparency rests with the [Justice Department] to lay out its reasoning." Since the warrant also includes an articulation of the potential legal violations to which the search relates, it may also be the case that Trump's team wants to avoid revealing the scope of the legal threat Trump faces.Oldbear83 said:
"Trump isn't releasing what he was served with."
His lawyers are saying they were not given a copy of the warrant. Said the agents flashed a paper then shoved in.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/08/10/trump-fbi-search/
I notice no name for their "source".
Means jack
I wonder if WaPo's "source" will turn out to be the mail room guy or someone from The View.
WaPo said they had a copy. His lawyer said they didn't get it right away. There's no contradiction except the one y'all are trying to manufacture.4th and Inches said:shown and allowed to read the unsealed part, no copy was presented according to cited sources.Oldbear83 said:The relevant part is whether he. through his lawyers, was presented a copy of the warrant at the time of the search, as required by law.Osodecentx said:It means, contrary to your assertions, that the Trump team has a copy of the warrantOldbear83 said:WaPo sides with Biden and Sam.Osodecentx said:Trump's legal team was given a copy of the warrant. It has declined to release it, one source told NBC News's Vaughn Hillyard, because "the burden of transparency rests with the [Justice Department] to lay out its reasoning." Since the warrant also includes an articulation of the potential legal violations to which the search relates, it may also be the case that Trump's team wants to avoid revealing the scope of the legal threat Trump faces.Oldbear83 said:
"Trump isn't releasing what he was served with."
His lawyers are saying they were not given a copy of the warrant. Said the agents flashed a paper then shoved in.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/08/10/trump-fbi-search/
I notice no name for their "source".
Means jack
I wonder if WaPo's "source" will turn out to be the mail room guy or someone from The View.
A copy was presented according to unnamed source.
Who to beleive, who to beleive..
Sticking with anonymous 'sources', I see.Osodecentx said:
Trump emerged from the question-and-non-answer session with praise for the "very professional" way Attorney General Letitia James's team handled the meeting, in which he refused more than 400 times to answer questions about his businesses, property valuations and loans, according to a person with knowledge of the discussion.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
When they were given the warrant matters, Sam.Sam Lowry said:WaPo said they had a copy. His lawyer said they didn't get it right away. There's no contradiction except the one y'all are trying to manufacture.4th and Inches said:shown and allowed to read the unsealed part, no copy was presented according to cited sources.Oldbear83 said:The relevant part is whether he. through his lawyers, was presented a copy of the warrant at the time of the search, as required by law.Osodecentx said:It means, contrary to your assertions, that the Trump team has a copy of the warrantOldbear83 said:WaPo sides with Biden and Sam.Osodecentx said:Trump's legal team was given a copy of the warrant. It has declined to release it, one source told NBC News's Vaughn Hillyard, because "the burden of transparency rests with the [Justice Department] to lay out its reasoning." Since the warrant also includes an articulation of the potential legal violations to which the search relates, it may also be the case that Trump's team wants to avoid revealing the scope of the legal threat Trump faces.Oldbear83 said:
"Trump isn't releasing what he was served with."
His lawyers are saying they were not given a copy of the warrant. Said the agents flashed a paper then shoved in.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/08/10/trump-fbi-search/
I notice no name for their "source".
Means jack
I wonder if WaPo's "source" will turn out to be the mail room guy or someone from The View.
A copy was presented according to unnamed source.
Who to beleive, who to beleive..
Did you skip class the day they covered that?
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier