Federal Judge blocks Trump from deporting illegal alien gang members

211,523 Views | 2534 Replies | Last: 2 mo ago by Assassin
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sanctuary City/County/Police Department locator

https://cis.org/Map-Sanctuary-Cities-Counties-and-States
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Porteroso said:

Assassin said:



Tell me there's more to this tweet than you wanting this guy deported for having face tatos.
And please tell us that a young latin male with tattoos all over his face like this raises red flags for you in the very least, and would warrant closer attention from authorities.

I ask because based on your posting history, I'm not sure that it does.

Oh absolutely not. You mean if you see a Latin male with face tatoos you assume they need to be deported? Red flags? Needs attention from the government?

This is the reason the pendulum swings so hard lect.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gtownbear said:

I don't have conflicting views on the rule of law. And NO ONE is a zealot that wants illegals who came here wrongly to be deported, especially gang members and criminals that murder and commit crimes against our American citizens. I am for OUR CITIZENS! Got it? You know what you can do with your sick name calling. I have not insulted you by calling you names. Grow up.

All you have to do is look at your posts to see you don't want the rule of law if it might slow down deportations.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:



That is not true. Why do you believe all these insane claims before doing any homework?
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Assassin said:



That is not true. Why do you believe all these insane claims before doing any homework?
Strange how you always say EXACTLY the same thing and get proven wrong over and over.
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
canoso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Porteroso said:

Assassin said:



Tell me there's more to this tweet than you wanting this guy deported for having face tatos.
And please tell us that a young latin male with tattoos all over his face like this raises red flags for you in the very least, and would warrant closer attention from authorities.

I ask because based on your posting history, I'm not sure that it does.

Oh absolutely not. You mean if you see a Latin male with face tatoos you assume they need to be deported? Red flags? Needs attention from the government?

This is the reason the pendulum swings so hard lect.
The pendulum has swung hard left? It hasn't swung left since Jan 20 2025. Please get caught up every chance you get.
canoso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
canoso said:

Porteroso said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Porteroso said:

Assassin said:



Tell me there's more to this tweet than you wanting this guy deported for having face tatos.
And please tell us that a young latin male with tattoos all over his face like this raises red flags for you in the very least, and would warrant closer attention from authorities.

I ask because based on your posting history, I'm not sure that it does.

Oh absolutely not. You mean if you see a Latin male with face tatoos you assume they need to be deported? Red flags? Needs attention from the government?

This is the reason the pendulum swings so hard lect.
The pendulum has swung hard left? It hasn't swung left, hard or otherwise, since Jan 20 2025. Please get caught up every chance you get.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
canoso said:

Porteroso said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Porteroso said:

Assassin said:



Tell me there's more to this tweet than you wanting this guy deported for having face tatos.
And please tell us that a young latin male with tattoos all over his face like this raises red flags for you in the very least, and would warrant closer attention from authorities.

I ask because based on your posting history, I'm not sure that it does.

Oh absolutely not. You mean if you see a Latin male with face tatoos you assume they need to be deported? Red flags? Needs attention from the government?

This is the reason the pendulum swings so hard lect.
The pendulum has swung hard left? It hasn't swung left since Jan 20 2025. Please get caught up every chance you get.

Over and over throughout history. People get overzealous wanting anyone with a face tatoos, possibly Hispanic, deported, then you have others that are overzealous wanting to protect them.

Condescend once you comprehend.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:

Porteroso said:

Assassin said:



That is not true. Why do you believe all these insane claims before doing any homework?
Strange how you always say EXACTLY the same thing and get proven wrong over and over.

Oh I do? So you already know how ludicrous this claim is?
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Redbrickbear said:

Waco1947 said:

Wage suppression? what do you mean?
[A surplus of labor will lead to increased competition among job seekers, driving wages down as workers are willing to accept lower pay to secure employment.]

[In a situation of excess supply in the labor market, with many applicants for every job opening, employers will have an incentive to offer lower wages than they otherwise would have. Nurses' salary will move down toward equilibrium.]

Flood any country will migrants and wages will decline or remain stagnant
ECON 101: the law of supply and demand

Everyone should have a basic economic education based upon the Austrian School, not Keynesian or Marxist economics.
Pretty sure you would not like the results of that.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:

Sanctuary City/County/Police Department locator

https://cis.org/Map-Sanctuary-Cities-Counties-and-States
And nothing in Texas! BEAUTIFUL!!
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Actually, I have a decent understanding of Austrian School thinking and I think it's the best for modern economics education. Von Hayek & von Mises are among my favorite economists. The key is to focus on capitalism, aka the free market system, and getting government out of the economy as much as possible. The government messes up everything it touches. Literally.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Assassin said:

Porteroso said:

Assassin said:



That is not true. Why do you believe all these insane claims before doing any homework?
Strange how you always say EXACTLY the same thing and get proven wrong over and over.

Oh I do? So you already know how ludicrous this claim is?
Go for it. Show me your homework
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
gtownbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No with you it is always one more hearing, one more necessary piece to the due process circumstance for millions who came in illegally, and today finding out 700,000 with criminal records, many under deportation orders. The law requires that these illegals claiming asylum are required by law to be held in custody until their asylum hearings which must be held within 30 days of entry. Since Biden released them into cities, towns and communities, they were required to register with the government within 30 days, and to inform the immigration folks within 10 days of an address change or it was a criminal act.

My point is a regular American citizen does not get four or five due process chances when he or she is charged with breaking the law. No the judicial system tries us and if convicted sentences us. But these illegals have broken all of our immigration laws and then when an administration enforces the laws, they and you claim fowl and say how unfair everything is. Nonsense. They could have come in the correct way but chose to cut in line instead and now they are paying the consequences. Some of these individuals have been deported and have returned three or four times. Time to say enough is enough.

There are grounds to deport most of these millions. And in order to preserve our country that is what needs to take place.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?




“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Assassin said:

Porteroso said:

Assassin said:



That is not true. Why do you believe all these insane claims before doing any homework?
Strange how you always say EXACTLY the same thing and get proven wrong over and over.

Oh I do? So you already know how ludicrous this claim is?
You may be confused, Porteroso.

You frequently make ludicrous claims, but that hardly means claims you don't like are therefore also absurd.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?






“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Actually, I have a decent understanding of Austrian School thinking and I think it's the best for modern economics education. Von Hayek & von Mises are among my favorite economists. The key is to focus on capitalism, aka the free market system, and getting government out of the economy as much as possible. The government messes up everything it touches. Literally.
That's why they didn't trust the government to tell people where they could live or for whom they could work. The Austrians' beliefs about the economics of immigration are basically the opposite of yours. To the extent they sympathized with immigration restrictions, it was from a desire to maintain white European cultural dominance. A political discourse based on Austrian theory would be more honest in that sense. It would recognize the contribution of immigrants and their role in the free market. It would also dispense with a lot of the bad economic theory that serves as a fig leaf for underlying racial grievances.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You are looking at politics and I'm looking at economics. The Austrian School is a branch of economics, essentially capitalism iodates for modern conditions. Those other issues are irrelevant to the discussion.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

You are looking at politics and I'm looking at economics. The Austrian School is a branch of economics, essentially capitalism iodates for modern conditions. Those other issues are irrelevant to the discussion.
What I'm saying is, strictly in terms of economics, foreign workers migrating across the border is a good thing from the Austrian point of view. It's nothing but supply and demand in action. The immigration restrictions that you favor are an example of the government messing things up.
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Porteroso said:

Assassin said:



Tell me there's more to this tweet than you wanting this guy deported for having face tatos.
And please tell us that a young latin male with tattoos all over his face like this raises red flags for you in the very least, and would warrant closer attention from authorities.

I ask because based on your posting history, I'm not sure that it does.

Oh absolutely not. You mean if you see a Latin male with face tatoos you assume they need to be deported? Red flags? Needs attention from the government?

This is the reason the pendulum swings so hard lect.
LOL. Of course it doesn't. It's not too surprising given that you argued passionately that the parents who take their kids to drag queen story hour should be blamed, but the drag queens themselves should not. And that it's racist to say that BLM was a false narrative. It's a pattern.

And I didn't say that they should be deported simply for having face tattoos like what that guy had, I said it should raise red flags and warrant attention. Any sane, rational person would agree. You made strawman, because either you're dishonest, or you can't read or think straight, likely due to TDS. It seems to be endemic among the left and among rinos.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The concealing of illegals, many who have committed violent crimes and moving them around has become some sort of modern underground railroad.

The left is increasingly defending violence.
gtownbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
With the left it is stop Trump by all means legal and illegal. From two impeachments based on lies, and numerous lawsuits in deep blue jurisdictions, including the Letitia James lawsuit challenging Trump's business deal where there were no victims; the banks were happy as all made money and were paid in full by Trump, to now the radical judges issuing injunctions on every action President Trump takes.

Make no mistake these are not the judges of old. These are activists that are radicalized to push their Anti-American agenda. Chief Justice Roberts and the Supreme Court should have stopped these overstepping judges at the beginning of their grab of Executive Branch authority. Their denial to President Trump in the use of the Alien Enemies Act will be a blot on that court for years to come. That was the law to fast track all of these illegals out of the country.

Our blessing is that President Trump is a fighter and will continue and continue and continue with plan A then plan B and so on. Now he is about to tighten the screws on the sanctuary cities through cutting off federal funds as well as legal charges where applicable. In the long run our side will win.

But isn't it sad to see so many on the left DEFENDING gang members who murder, rape, assault and steal from our fellow American citizens. I mean who would defend criminals over law abiding Americans? I am shocked.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

You are looking at politics and I'm looking at economics. The Austrian School is a branch of economics, essentially capitalism iodates for modern conditions. Those other issues are irrelevant to the discussion.
What I'm saying is, strictly in terms of economics, foreign workers migrating across the border is a good thing from the Austrian point of view. It's nothing but supply and demand in action. The immigration restrictions that you favor are an example of the government messing things up.

Only if they come legally. You obviously have no idea what kind of immigration restrictions I favor do you should not jump to conclusions. You look foolish going so.

No one in their right mind thinks the country is better off having terrorists, gangbangers, rapists, murderers, etc come here from other countries. So naturally, Leftists all over America, in and out of government, want all these dregs of humanity coming into the US, want to keep them here, & want to bring back the scum already deported.

Maybe TDS needs to be upgraded to an office as l mental disorder. Those experiencing it say & do the stupidest things, even more than normal for our modern fascists. But it goes beyond hating Trump: they must hate all Americans and the country itself. What pathetic, miserable traitors they must be.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

The concealing of illegals, many who have committed violent crimes and moving them around has become some sort of modern underground railroad.

The left is increasingly defending violence.

The Leftists are even advocating in favor of political assassination. They are morons: if they think killing people that disagree with them is acceptable, they should expect violence against themselves & others on their side. The world does not operate in a vacuum & actions have consequences.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unfortunately, it is not surprising that Dems are defending rapists, murderers, gangbangers, etc: that's what their party has become. It's the party of criminals, perverts, & other freaks. They are more like organized crime than a legitimate political movement. That's one reason I accurately label them as fascists.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

You are looking at politics and I'm looking at economics. The Austrian School is a branch of economics, essentially capitalism iodates for modern conditions. Those other issues are irrelevant to the discussion.
What I'm saying is, strictly in terms of economics, foreign workers migrating across the border is a good thing from the Austrian point of view. It's nothing but supply and demand in action. The immigration restrictions that you favor are an example of the government messing things up.

Only if they come legally. You obviously have no idea what kind of immigration restrictions I favor do you should not jump to conclusions. You look foolish going so.
That doesn't change the economic analysis. Whether legally or not, they are meeting a demand.
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

You are looking at politics and I'm looking at economics. The Austrian School is a branch of economics, essentially capitalism iodates for modern conditions. Those other issues are irrelevant to the discussion.
What I'm saying is, strictly in terms of economics, foreign workers migrating across the border is a good thing from the Austrian point of view. It's nothing but supply and demand in action. The immigration restrictions that you favor are an example of the government messing things up.

Only if they come legally. You obviously have no idea what kind of immigration restrictions I favor do you should not jump to conclusions. You look foolish going so.
That doesn't change the economic analysis. Whether legally or not, they are meeting a demand.
They are seriously only meeting the demand by the party elites for more Democrat party voters over the last four years.
Again, if you have to import voters illegally to stay in power, you are not legit.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

You are looking at politics and I'm looking at economics. The Austrian School is a branch of economics, essentially capitalism iodates for modern conditions. Those other issues are irrelevant to the discussion.
What I'm saying is, strictly in terms of economics, foreign workers migrating across the border is a good thing from the Austrian point of view. It's nothing but supply and demand in action. The immigration restrictions that you favor are an example of the government messing things up.

Only if they come legally. You obviously have no idea what kind of immigration restrictions I favor do you should not jump to conclusions. You look foolish going so.
That doesn't change the economic analysis. Whether legally or not, they are meeting a demand.


Believing that illegals are the same as legal immigrants is as foolish as pretending competency is irrelevant in hiring employees.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

You are looking at politics and I'm looking at economics. The Austrian School is a branch of economics, essentially capitalism iodates for modern conditions. Those other issues are irrelevant to the discussion.
What I'm saying is, strictly in terms of economics, foreign workers migrating across the border is a good thing from the Austrian point of view. It's nothing but supply and demand in action. The immigration restrictions that you favor are an example of the government messing things up.

Only if they come legally. You obviously have no idea what kind of immigration restrictions I favor do you should not jump to conclusions. You look foolish going so.
That doesn't change the economic analysis. Whether legally or not, they are meeting a demand.
They are seriously only meeting the demand by the party elites for more Democrat party voters over the last four years.
Again, if you have to import voters illegally to stay in power, you are not legit.
Noncitizen voting is vanishingly rare, despite what Trump would have you believe.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.