FLBear5630 said:
This is what I am talking about. Unless the Developers Agreements are in writing and have specifics identified, such as decibel levels, water quality and usage, energy provision, clear zones they DCs will gut the local communities. They will build cheap and use every bit of infrastructure they can and then make the locals upgrade or threaten to leave.
It reminds me of the gambling craze of the 90's. Communities wanted gambling on their terms. Initially they agreed, only on weekends, 2 am limits. Then the casinos needed infrastructure - roads, water, wastewater. The communities bonded it and took on the debt for economic development.
Then the casinos said they need 24 hours, only on weekends or they would have to leave. Then it was 7 days a week or they would have to leave. On and on it went until they got everything they could and still left. Leaving communities with bond payments, assessments and crime issues.
They need to make the business pay, not the communities. Seen this for 35 years, it usually does not end well for the small towns.
The economics does not work as promised, either. These data centers only make sense as an investment if they can guarantee jobs, do not harm the region's residents, mitigate hazards in advance and include significant participation by all stakeholders.
We're not seeing anything like that in the actual cases.