Talarico vs Paxton

108,858 Views | 1303 Replies | Last: 30 min ago by whiterock
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lesbyterian pastor tells James Talarico's church it's jarring to hear people use male pronouns for God

https://notthebee.com/article/lesbyterian-pastor-tells-james-talaricos-church-its-jarring-to-hear-other-churches-use-male-pronouns-for-god
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I googled that Pulse Decision Science outfit, it led me to this tweet below from Oklahoma GOP candidate for Gov talking about his (then upcoming) runoff. Pulse Decision had him up by 6% three weeks before the runoff. That election happened on 8/25, and Mazzei won it by 0.6%. Your tweet shows Paxton up by less, and within their margin for error.

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Low-T cannot fire up the black base - which accounts for his 3 point deficit.

White liberals love them some trans, blacks and Hispanics - not so much.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

J.R. said:

historian said:

OK, Gallup is certainly well known. When I clicked in the link I did not see that. However, prominent sites like Gallup are far from perfect and often are wrong. I've seen far more polling results favoring deportation than amnesty.

More importantly, it's more than a popularity contest. The last thing any country needs is to ignore the crimes of millions of individuals. Crime must be punished under the law. This is a fundamental characteristic of the rule of law, a founding principle, and a healthy civilization. Without it a society begins to disintegrate into chaos.

Naturally, the fascists want chaos so they can demagogue and manipulate people into helping them take over. Next comes mass slavery, gulags or concentration camps, persecution, and mass murder. The Dems favor all of this. Some are even saying the quiet parts out loud.

It's totally evil and un-American.

once again, the teacher man knows not Amerians prefer. No mass deportation. Get out of your little Maga spiral. Maga is a fraud.


I'm not sure the argument you are making

Are you saying the liberal political opposition in the USA will never allow mass deportations? Backed up by the cheap labor loving big business community and academia…

If so…then yes that seems a likely outcome.

Or are you saying the USA just can't actually logistically deport millions of 3rd world migrants?

I mean the USA is a global super power. Recently the little Dominican Republic deported in excess of 600,000+ illegal Haitians. And the DR is far poorer and less technically advanced country than America

If a tiny 11 million person Caribbean nation can deport the equivalent of 5%-6% of its population. We can

[The Dominican Republic deported more than 226,500 Haitians between January and July of 2026, this followed approximately 380,000 deportations conducted in 2025]


point is simple . No mass deportation. Our economy can't take it. Gonna have to provide a path to citizenship and then let's follow the rules on immigration. That can easily be done sans ICE
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

If we imported 10-15 million illegals under Pres Autopen, we can deport them. We would be rid of a lot more of them if the fascists were not fighting every step of the way with lies, violence, & fraud. That's what the Left does.


We'd be rid of more of them if Republicans started putting America First over starting wars for Israel and wasting resources, manpower, and money an accomplishing nothing.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This polling unit is run by Mark Penn, pollster for the Bill Clinton Whitehouse.

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.