North Korea Makes an Offer

73,804 Views | 748 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by HuMcK
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hold on just a damn minute....Trumps told us they dropped their drawers and de-nuked? but?
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cowboy said "Because you and everyone else have failed to take the next step and admit that if no president has met with the Kims that no president has been responsible for bringing remains home."
My apologies for not admitting it. You are absolutely right. No president has been responsible for bringing remains home. Trump did. It was a huge success.
Waco1947 ,la
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hey, we're talking

Better than shooting
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Moon is in Pyongyang for a 3 day visit, apparently negotiating a peace declaration without US input. If US and South Korean interests start to diverge away from each other too much things could get dicey. Meanwhile in the backdrop, NK is still quietly building their nuclear arsenal.

Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Talks = Good
Lies by Trump not helpful
Waco1947 ,la
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Divide and conquer seems to be working for Kim.
corncob pipe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Golem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
corncob pipe said:




Trump could walk on water and the left would decry his "inability to swim".
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
let us know when the de nuke
riflebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fubar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kim could do a belly flop in Pyongyang's pool and get a standing ovation.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Divide and conquer seems to be working for Kim.
what has he conquered?
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GolemIII said:

corncob pipe said:




Trump could walk on water and the left would decry his "inability to swim".
riflebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

let us know when the de nuke
It takes up to 2 yrs to fully denuclearize but I'd say this is more good news.

riflebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I swear this man works 24/7. Thought I would post this here since those who only watch CNN & MSNBC won't hear about it.



Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
riflebear said:

I swear this man works 24/7. Thought I would post this here since those who only watch CNN & MSNBC won't hear about it.






Democrat bought and paid MSM gripe at how this deal has hiccups along the way then don't report eventual successes of the deal. So dishonest

Notice how lefties here also don't chime in here?

So dishonest and destructive to our security. They should be held liable for the damage they do!
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

let us know when the de nuke


^^^ This .... is a loser!
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

TexasScientist said:

Divide and conquer seems to be working for Kim.
what has he conquered?
Trump's twitter.

The Nobel Peace Prize for Trump.

Fox News.

Etc.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
riflebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

TexasScientist said:

Divide and conquer seems to be working for Kim.
what has he conquered?
Trump's twitter.

The Nobel Peace Prize for Trump.

Fox News.

Etc.
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

TexasScientist said:

Divide and conquer seems to be working for Kim.
what has he conquered?
Trump's twitter.

The Nobel Peace Prize for Trump.

Fox News.

Etc.
South Korean President Moon Jae-in
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

quash said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

TexasScientist said:

Divide and conquer seems to be working for Kim.
what has he conquered?
Trump's twitter.

The Nobel Peace Prize for Trump.

Fox News.

Etc.
South Korean President Moon Jae-in
Madeleine Albright

Hillary Clinton

John Kerry


quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

TexasScientist said:

quash said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

TexasScientist said:

Divide and conquer seems to be working for Kim.
what has he conquered?
Trump's twitter.

The Nobel Peace Prize for Trump.

Fox News.

Etc.
South Korean President Moon Jae-in
Madeleine Albright

Hillary Clinton

John Kerry




Agreed. And Trump got nothing beyond what they got, except for pics with Kim. And that's a win for Kim, not Trump.

Remember when Trump said it woyld only take dew minutes to know if Kim was serious about denuking? And he'd walk away if Kim weren't serious?

You member. ..
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

ATL Bear said:

TexasScientist said:

quash said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

TexasScientist said:

Divide and conquer seems to be working for Kim.
what has he conquered?
Trump's twitter.

The Nobel Peace Prize for Trump.

Fox News.

Etc.
South Korean President Moon Jae-in
Madeleine Albright

Hillary Clinton

John Kerry




Agreed. And Trump got nothing beyond what they got, except for pics with Kim. And that's a win for Kim, not Trump.

Remember when Trump said it woyld only take dew minutes to know if Kim was serious about denuking? And he'd walk away if Kim weren't serious?

You member. ..


My God you're such a fool!
riflebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

ATL Bear said:

TexasScientist said:

quash said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

TexasScientist said:

Divide and conquer seems to be working for Kim.
what has he conquered?
Trump's twitter.

The Nobel Peace Prize for Trump.

Fox News.

Etc.
South Korean President Moon Jae-in
Madeleine Albright

Hillary Clinton

John Kerry




Agreed. And Trump got nothing beyond what they got, except for pics with Kim. And that's a win for Kim, not Trump.

Remember when Trump said it woyld only take dew minutes to know if Kim was serious about denuking? And he'd walk away if Kim weren't serious?

You member. ..
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
riflebear said:

quash said:

ATL Bear said:

TexasScientist said:

quash said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

TexasScientist said:

Divide and conquer seems to be working for Kim.
what has he conquered?
Trump's twitter.

The Nobel Peace Prize for Trump.

Fox News.

Etc.
South Korean President Moon Jae-in
Madeleine Albright

Hillary Clinton

John Kerry




Agreed. And Trump got nothing beyond what they got, except for pics with Kim. And that's a win for Kim, not Trump.

Remember when Trump said it woyld only take dew minutes to know if Kim was serious about denuking? And he'd walk away if Kim weren't serious?

You member. ..



So democrats now will say without Obama this would have never happened?

Ha

MAGA

USA USA USA ......

We're the best we've ever been, just need to eliminate democrats and this country would prosper beyond belief

I'm serious, today's Democrat needs eliminated, vaporized!
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

ATL Bear said:

TexasScientist said:

quash said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

TexasScientist said:

Divide and conquer seems to be working for Kim.
what has he conquered?
Trump's twitter.

The Nobel Peace Prize for Trump.

Fox News.

Etc.
South Korean President Moon Jae-in
Madeleine Albright

Hillary Clinton

John Kerry




Agreed. And Trump got nothing beyond what they got, except for pics with Kim. And that's a win for Kim, not Trump.

Remember when Trump said it woyld only take dew minutes to know if Kim was serious about denuking? And he'd walk away if Kim weren't serious?

You member. ..
We're in a different phase with NK and we are broaching new ground, whether people want to acknowledge it or not. It could all crash and burn in the future, and we're miles from de nuking at a real level, but the progress can't be ignored.
Golem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

quash said:

ATL Bear said:

TexasScientist said:

quash said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

TexasScientist said:

Divide and conquer seems to be working for Kim.
what has he conquered?
Trump's twitter.

The Nobel Peace Prize for Trump.

Fox News.

Etc.
South Korean President Moon Jae-in
Madeleine Albright

Hillary Clinton

John Kerry




Agreed. And Trump got nothing beyond what they got, except for pics with Kim. And that's a win for Kim, not Trump.

Remember when Trump said it woyld only take dew minutes to know if Kim was serious about denuking? And he'd walk away if Kim weren't serious?

You member. ..
We're in a different phase with NK and we are broaching new ground, whether people want to acknowledge it or not. It could all crash and burn in the future, and we're miles from de nuking at a real level, but the progress can't be ignored.
quash knows none of the advances would have happened without Trump. He just won't say it. He knows Obama would have never gotten anything like it because it's only bellicosity that the Kims respect and Obama's ability to threaten ended with his using "redlines" for international games of hopscotch.

Trump is a jackass. But he's our jackass and he gets things done, in many instances ONLY because he is a jackass. Is there a down side? Of course. But the upside of a belligerent POTUS is appearing to be far far greater than the down side.
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A tough stance POTUS is not necessarily bad. What is dangerous is a POTUS who is poorly educated and whimsical.
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

A tough stance POTUS is not necessarily bad. What is dangerous is a POTUS who is poorly educated and whimsical.


Poorly educated and whimsical? You serious?

Perhaps he's abit further sited than you and your ilk?

Ummm this is working out, in time! The "in time" part escapes the anti Trumpettes and/or poorly educated or those lacking wisdom and experience

TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Definitely poorly educated. Clearly English is his second language, and he doesn't have a first language. His comments reveal he knows very little about history, or the current world. His behavior is impulsive. Tell me what evidence you have of any serious forethought he has given to any of his foreign policy decisions. What good he has done through shaking things up is a coincidental by product of impulsive action, and the bad that can come from that behavior can be far reaching and long lasting.
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

quash said:

ATL Bear said:

TexasScientist said:

quash said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

TexasScientist said:

Divide and conquer seems to be working for Kim.
what has he conquered?
Trump's twitter.

The Nobel Peace Prize for Trump.

Fox News.

Etc.
South Korean President Moon Jae-in
Madeleine Albright

Hillary Clinton

John Kerry




Agreed. And Trump got nothing beyond what they got, except for pics with Kim. And that's a win for Kim, not Trump.

Remember when Trump said it woyld only take dew minutes to know if Kim was serious about denuking? And he'd walk away if Kim weren't serious?

You member. ..
We're in a different phase with NK and we are broaching new ground, whether people want to acknowledge it or not. It could all crash and burn in the future, and we're miles from de nuking at a real level, but the progress can't be ignored.
So you don't remember?
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't think you can call it progress yet.
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Definitely poorly educated. Clearly English is his second language, and he doesn't have a first language. His comments reveal he knows very little about history, or the current world. His behavior is impulsive. Tell me what evidence you have of any serious forethought he has given to any of his foreign policy decisions. What good he has done through shaking things up is a coincidental by product of impulsive action, and the bad that can come from that behavior can be far reaching and long lasting.


It's called negotiating!

That's what Trump does and you obviously have no training in it

That's too bad

Cliffnotes on Negotiations 101 > It takes time to get to the end of any negotiation that finds balance to wrongs done by one country against ours for decades by weak politicians that have negotiated very poorly. An example of hard ball negotiations are the tariffs against the Chinese. Chinese have tarriffed us to death and refuse to stop. Sooooo, the only alternative is to impose tariffs on them until they hurt enough to agree to lower they tariffs to an acceptable level for us. Democrats know nothing of negotiations so they insult this process because it doesn't yield immediate results. Give it time, Chinese will eventually hurt enough and cave to Trump's negotiations. It's a beautiful thing to watch. Kim jung un has done same as shown above but it took time. Now Korea is safer than its been in our lives. Art of the Deal is on display everyday

If democrats are whining it must be working
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who is fool for asking a legitimate question?
Waco1947 ,la
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.