Lol. It isn't pedantry or quibbling at all. And yes I am proving you wrong.HuMcK said:cowboycwr said:HuMcK said:cowboycwr said:IF NK wants NATO troops out of South Korea then we should totally agree to that.... because there are not NATO troops in South Korea....HuMcK said:Doc Holliday said:
But Drumpf is going to get us all nuked reeeeeeeeeeeee!
Un's father made the same pronouncements. Again, they are not talking about unilaterally giving up their nukes. When NK talks about denuclearization, they mean the removal of all nuclear-armed (NATO) forces from the Korean Peninsula, probably along with regime-safety guarantees and recognition. I'm sure they definitely wouldn't invade SK immediately after our forces left the battlespace, because NK has a history of trustworthiness and good faith negotiations. /s
there is however a UN mission there.....
Pedantry aside, which I know you love, you would take a deal where NK promised to disarm if we left the area?
I just love proving you wrong. You don't even know who has troops there or what organization they are from but you want to complain about a hypothetical.
I see, pedantry it is. You know quibbling over word use isn't "proving me wrong", right? It's just a tactic for avoiding the substance of the discussion, something I've noticed you're very good at.
You claimed that both the current and previous leader of North Korea want NATO troops out of South Korea.
That is not using the wrong word. That is making a false claim.
I simply pointed out that you were wrong and that there are no NATO troops in South Korea.