North Korea Makes an Offer

73,800 Views | 748 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by HuMcK
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK said:

cowboycwr said:

HuMcK said:

cowboycwr said:

HuMcK said:

Doc Holliday said:



But Drumpf is going to get us all nuked reeeeeeeeeeeee!


Un's father made the same pronouncements. Again, they are not talking about unilaterally giving up their nukes. When NK talks about denuclearization, they mean the removal of all nuclear-armed (NATO) forces from the Korean Peninsula, probably along with regime-safety guarantees and recognition. I'm sure they definitely wouldn't invade SK immediately after our forces left the battlespace, because NK has a history of trustworthiness and good faith negotiations. /s
IF NK wants NATO troops out of South Korea then we should totally agree to that.... because there are not NATO troops in South Korea....

there is however a UN mission there.....




Pedantry aside, which I know you love, you would take a deal where NK promised to disarm if we left the area?


I just love proving you wrong. You don't even know who has troops there or what organization they are from but you want to complain about a hypothetical.


I see, pedantry it is. You know quibbling over word use isn't "proving me wrong", right? It's just a tactic for avoiding the substance of the discussion, something I've noticed you're very good at.
Lol. It isn't pedantry or quibbling at all. And yes I am proving you wrong.

You claimed that both the current and previous leader of North Korea want NATO troops out of South Korea.

That is not using the wrong word. That is making a false claim.

I simply pointed out that you were wrong and that there are no NATO troops in South Korea.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I do like Humk's strategy to argue hypotheticals. I'm going to try that with my wife. Maybe I can finally win an argument...

...although Humk doesn't seem to be winning this one.

Okay, maybe another strategy. Nukes it is!
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

HuMcK said:

cowboycwr said:

HuMcK said:

cowboycwr said:

HuMcK said:

Doc Holliday said:



But Drumpf is going to get us all nuked reeeeeeeeeeeee!


Un's father made the same pronouncements. Again, they are not talking about unilaterally giving up their nukes. When NK talks about denuclearization, they mean the removal of all nuclear-armed (NATO) forces from the Korean Peninsula, probably along with regime-safety guarantees and recognition. I'm sure they definitely wouldn't invade SK immediately after our forces left the battlespace, because NK has a history of trustworthiness and good faith negotiations. /s
IF NK wants NATO troops out of South Korea then we should totally agree to that.... because there are not NATO troops in South Korea....

there is however a UN mission there.....




Pedantry aside, which I know you love, you would take a deal where NK promised to disarm if we left the area?


I just love proving you wrong. You don't even know who has troops there or what organization they are from but you want to complain about a hypothetical.


I see, pedantry it is. You know quibbling over word use isn't "proving me wrong", right? It's just a tactic for avoiding the substance of the discussion, something I've noticed you're very good at.
Lol. It isn't pedantry or quibbling at all. And yes I am proving you wrong.

You claimed that both the current and previous leader of North Korea want NATO troops out of South Korea.

That is not using the wrong word. That is making a false claim.

I simply pointed out that you were wrong and that there are no NATO troops in South Korea.


Same exact tedious game you play in almost every thread you comment in on this site, "hurr durr you used the wrong words so I beat you". Fine, NK wants nuclear armed United Nations (but especially American) forces out of the peninsula, and that's what they mean by the "denuclearization" of Korea.
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

I do like Humk's strategy to argue hypotheticals. I'm going to try that with my wife. Maybe I can finally win an argument...

...although Humk doesn't seem to be winning this one.

Okay, maybe another strategy. Nukes it is!


Seriously how hard is is to type HuMcK? I don't think I've seen it done correctly on this forum yet.
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK said:

cowboycwr said:

HuMcK said:

cowboycwr said:

HuMcK said:

cowboycwr said:

HuMcK said:

Doc Holliday said:



But Drumpf is going to get us all nuked reeeeeeeeeeeee!


Un's father made the same pronouncements. Again, they are not talking about unilaterally giving up their nukes. When NK talks about denuclearization, they mean the removal of all nuclear-armed (NATO) forces from the Korean Peninsula, probably along with regime-safety guarantees and recognition. I'm sure they definitely wouldn't invade SK immediately after our forces left the battlespace, because NK has a history of trustworthiness and good faith negotiations. /s
IF NK wants NATO troops out of South Korea then we should totally agree to that.... because there are not NATO troops in South Korea....

there is however a UN mission there.....




Pedantry aside, which I know you love, you would take a deal where NK promised to disarm if we left the area?


I just love proving you wrong. You don't even know who has troops there or what organization they are from but you want to complain about a hypothetical.


I see, pedantry it is. You know quibbling over word use isn't "proving me wrong", right? It's just a tactic for avoiding the substance of the discussion, something I've noticed you're very good at.
Lol. It isn't pedantry or quibbling at all. And yes I am proving you wrong.

You claimed that both the current and previous leader of North Korea want NATO troops out of South Korea.

That is not using the wrong word. That is making a false claim.

I simply pointed out that you were wrong and that there are no NATO troops in South Korea.


Same exact tedious game you play in almost every thread you comment in on this site, "hurr durr you used the wrong words so I beat you". Fine, NK wants nuclear armed United Nations (but especially American) forces out of the peninsula, and that's what they mean by the "denuclearization" of Korea.

You hit the tar baby, you get stuck to the tar baby.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK


Have a great weekend!
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Could mean nothing, could be a complication for the upcoming talks.

HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DaveyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK said:


Honestly, you have the IQ of a house plant....or maybe even Le Stinque.
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DaveyBear said:

HuMcK said:


Honestly, you have the IQ of a house plant....or maybe even Le Stinque.

Lol good afternoon to you too.
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DaveyBear said:

HuMcK said:


Honestly, you have the IQ of a house plant....or maybe even Le Stinque.

Why? He didn't even say anything, just posted an update on the Korean situation.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Jack and DP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-17/trump-says-south-korea-has-his-blessing-for-north-korea-peace
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack and DP said:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-17/trump-says-south-korea-has-his-blessing-for-north-korea-peace

For some reason mentioning that gives one the IQ of a houseplant. No idea why.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
corncob pipe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
this is yuuuuge news
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
corncob pipe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump and lil Kim win Nobel Prize

Jinx shlts her bloomers
Jack and DP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
corncob pipe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In the same way Kim spun his message to the NK people that no more testing was needed and making NK look like victors, I think this NK source is spinning the info of a purely economic focus. I think the truth is in the middle. Hopefully leaning heavily towards the economic side.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kim's perception is Kim's reality.

When you combine Trump's willingness to use military power along with big spikes in the market, have these two things convinced Kim that Trump is a different type animal to deal with and driven him to negotiations?
corncob pipe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think he knows that his people have foot long tape worms and are eating grass... and in the age of information and technology.. Xi Jingping has said.. enough is enough

HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This would be the biggest step yet.
Jack and DP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/952749/kim-jong-un-north-korea-mcdonalds-donald-trump-usa
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
corncob pipe said:

Trump and lil Kim win Nobel Prize

Jinx shlts her bloomers


With Trump pulling the US out of the Paris Accord .....there is little chance the prize committee would award Trump for anything .
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Breaking: Trump administration to send World Food Programme into North Korea to assess food supply, starvation and health of people. Just announced on Fox. This is how we will get access to NK mike sites for inspection and develop a plan to help feed its people.

http://www1.wfp.org/countries/democratic-peoples-republic-korea
Jack and DP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2018/05/04/kim-jong-un-ordered-north-korean-hit-squad-to-hunt-high-ranking-defector-with-nuke-secrets-reports-say.html

Kang on the run.
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Breaking: Trump administration to send World Food Programme into North Korea to assess food supply, starvation and health of people. Just announced on Fox. This is how we will get access to NK mike sites for inspection and develop a plan to help feed its people.

http://www1.wfp.org/countries/democratic-peoples-republic-korea

LOL
First, nuke sites don't process food. If you think some NGO employees are going to risk disappearing into a NK prison for spying for the US you are delusional.

Second, the last time we provided food aid Un's dad trumpeted how the West paid tribute to him. Tribute in the old school sense of "please take these gifts and don't hurt us". Read some history.
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not sure I agree with this...
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK said:

Not sure I agree with this...

I think he stroking a giant ego before the next meeting
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Did I hear today Chair Kim gave up another concession?

Voluntarily blowing up tunnels
cinque
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Russia and China will be seen as the king makers regardless of how this ends up. Even if nothing else positive comes from this, the South Korean president deserves Trump's Nobel Peace Prize.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.