Your Daddy Trump told us all that we were there.GolemIII said:
Reading your posts is like sitting in a car with toddlers who are constantly whining "ARE WE THERE YET?!?!"
Now he says otherwise.
Your Daddy Trump told us all that we were there.GolemIII said:
Reading your posts is like sitting in a car with toddlers who are constantly whining "ARE WE THERE YET?!?!"
pruritus_ani said:Your Daddy Trump told us all that we were there.GolemIII said:
Reading your posts is like sitting in a car with toddlers who are constantly whining "ARE WE THERE YET?!?!"
Now he says otherwise.
A third Nobel nomination coming? Abe, Abe?HuMcK said:
Summit called to an early end, no agreements reached (not unexpectedly), not even a symbolic and vague statement of cooperation this time. POTUS did manage to absolve Kim of Otto Warmbier's death by torture in a North Korea prison camp though, so there's that. Maybe at least this time POTUS won't tweet-declare the end of the NK nuclear threat on the way home.
There is peace since POTUS took office.quash said:A third Nobel nomination coming? Abe, Abe?HuMcK said:
Summit called to an early end, no agreements reached (not unexpectedly), not even a symbolic and vague statement of cooperation this time. POTUS did manage to absolve Kim of Otto Warmbier's death by torture in a North Korea prison camp though, so there's that. Maybe at least this time POTUS won't tweet-declare the end of the NK nuclear threat on the way home.
He doesn't want them talking. Talking is bad!cowboycwr said:
Right on cue Huck shows up to bash Trump on NK even though basically nothing happened while he still ignores that the only reason NK and SK are talking is because of Trump.
Depends.Sam Lowry said:He doesn't want them talking. Talking is bad!cowboycwr said:
Right on cue Huck shows up to bash Trump on NK even though basically nothing happened while he still ignores that the only reason NK and SK are talking is because of Trump.
Less dependence on China in these negotiations and direct dialogue. An easing of tensions from the "Rocketman" days when everyone swore Trump was going to get us into a nuclear war.quash said:Depends.Sam Lowry said:He doesn't want them talking. Talking is bad!cowboycwr said:
Right on cue Huck shows up to bash Trump on NK even though basically nothing happened while he still ignores that the only reason NK and SK are talking is because of Trump.
Talking to the US president gives cred to a murderous dictator. Which is OK if you get something out of it. Talks were cut short today because of lack of progress.
What have we given up? What have we gotten?
you have to admit "fire and fury" is a threat of nuclear war. It was a hollow threat but NK is crazy.ATL Bear said:Less dependence on China in these negotiations and direct dialogue. An easing of tensions from the "Rocketman" days when everyone swore Trump was going to get us into a nuclear war.quash said:Depends.Sam Lowry said:He doesn't want them talking. Talking is bad!cowboycwr said:
Right on cue Huck shows up to bash Trump on NK even though basically nothing happened while he still ignores that the only reason NK and SK are talking is because of Trump.
Talking to the US president gives cred to a murderous dictator. Which is OK if you get something out of it. Talks were cut short today because of lack of progress.
What have we given up? What have we gotten?
Haven't seen much given up so far.
An easing of the tensions Trump created: The Trump Doctrine.ATL Bear said:Less dependence on China in these negotiations and direct dialogue. An easing of tensions from the "Rocketman" days when everyone swore Trump was going to get us into a nuclear war.quash said:Depends.Sam Lowry said:He doesn't want them talking. Talking is bad!cowboycwr said:
Right on cue Huck shows up to bash Trump on NK even though basically nothing happened while he still ignores that the only reason NK and SK are talking is because of Trump.
Talking to the US president gives cred to a murderous dictator. Which is OK if you get something out of it. Talks were cut short today because of lack of progress.
What have we given up? What have we gotten?
Haven't seen much given up so far.
Reagan also escalated before deescalating. So Reagan Doctrine.quash said:An easing of the tensions Trump created: The Trump Doctrine.ATL Bear said:Less dependence on China in these negotiations and direct dialogue. An easing of tensions from the "Rocketman" days when everyone swore Trump was going to get us into a nuclear war.quash said:Depends.Sam Lowry said:He doesn't want them talking. Talking is bad!cowboycwr said:
Right on cue Huck shows up to bash Trump on NK even though basically nothing happened while he still ignores that the only reason NK and SK are talking is because of Trump.
Talking to the US president gives cred to a murderous dictator. Which is OK if you get something out of it. Talks were cut short today because of lack of progress.
What have we given up? What have we gotten?
Haven't seen much given up so far.
Waco1947 said:you have to admit "fire and fury" is a threat of nuclear war. It was a hollow threat but NK is crazy.ATL Bear said:Less dependence on China in these negotiations and direct dialogue. An easing of tensions from the "Rocketman" days when everyone swore Trump was going to get us into a nuclear war.quash said:Depends.Sam Lowry said:He doesn't want them talking. Talking is bad!cowboycwr said:
Right on cue Huck shows up to bash Trump on NK even though basically nothing happened while he still ignores that the only reason NK and SK are talking is because of Trump.
Talking to the US president gives cred to a murderous dictator. Which is OK if you get something out of it. Talks were cut short today because of lack of progress.
What have we given up? What have we gotten?
Haven't seen much given up so far.
TexasScientist said:
Seat of the pants/gut feeling: Trump Doctrine.
TexasScientist said:
Seat of the pants/gut feeling: Trump Doctrine.
ATL Bear said:Reagan also escalated before deescalating. So Reagan Doctrine.quash said:An easing of the tensions Trump created: The Trump Doctrine.ATL Bear said:Less dependence on China in these negotiations and direct dialogue. An easing of tensions from the "Rocketman" days when everyone swore Trump was going to get us into a nuclear war.quash said:Depends.Sam Lowry said:He doesn't want them talking. Talking is bad!cowboycwr said:
Right on cue Huck shows up to bash Trump on NK even though basically nothing happened while he still ignores that the only reason NK and SK are talking is because of Trump.
Talking to the US president gives cred to a murderous dictator. Which is OK if you get something out of it. Talks were cut short today because of lack of progress.
What have we given up? What have we gotten?
Haven't seen much given up so far.
quash said:Depends.Sam Lowry said:He doesn't want them talking. Talking is bad!cowboycwr said:
Right on cue Huck shows up to bash Trump on NK even though basically nothing happened while he still ignores that the only reason NK and SK are talking is because of Trump.
Talking to the US president gives cred to a murderous dictator. Which is OK if you get something out of it. Talks were cut short today because of lack of progress.
What have we given up? What have we gotten?
JXL said:quash said:Depends.Sam Lowry said:He doesn't want them talking. Talking is bad!cowboycwr said:
Right on cue Huck shows up to bash Trump on NK even though basically nothing happened while he still ignores that the only reason NK and SK are talking is because of Trump.
Talking to the US president gives cred to a murderous dictator. Which is OK if you get something out of it. Talks were cut short today because of lack of progress.
What have we given up? What have we gotten?
It's odd that all the people screaming about Trump "cozying up to a murderous dictator" had no problems with Obama cozying up to the Castro brothers.
JXL said:quash said:Depends.Sam Lowry said:He doesn't want them talking. Talking is bad!cowboycwr said:
Right on cue Huck shows up to bash Trump on NK even though basically nothing happened while he still ignores that the only reason NK and SK are talking is because of Trump.
Talking to the US president gives cred to a murderous dictator. Which is OK if you get something out of it. Talks were cut short today because of lack of progress.
What have we given up? What have we gotten?
It's odd that all the people screaming about Trump "cozying up to a murderous dictator" had no problems with Obama cozying up to the Castro brothers.
quash said:JXL said:quash said:Depends.Sam Lowry said:He doesn't want them talking. Talking is bad!cowboycwr said:
Right on cue Huck shows up to bash Trump on NK even though basically nothing happened while he still ignores that the only reason NK and SK are talking is because of Trump.
Talking to the US president gives cred to a murderous dictator. Which is OK if you get something out of it. Talks were cut short today because of lack of progress.
What have we given up? What have we gotten?
It's odd that all the people screaming about Trump "cozying up to a murderous dictator" had no problems with Obama cozying up to the Castro brothers.
It's odd you think I'm screaming.
And Cuba is changing its constitution to add more personal and market freedoms.
JXL said:quash said:Depends.Sam Lowry said:He doesn't want them talking. Talking is bad!cowboycwr said:
Right on cue Huck shows up to bash Trump on NK even though basically nothing happened while he still ignores that the only reason NK and SK are talking is because of Trump.
Talking to the US president gives cred to a murderous dictator. Which is OK if you get something out of it. Talks were cut short today because of lack of progress.
What have we given up? What have we gotten?
It's odd that all the people screaming about Trump "cozying up to a murderous dictator" had no problems with Obama cozying up to the Castro brothers.
That is true. But it goes the other way also. All the people falling on their swords for Trump because they like some of his policies, would be the first to condemn those who supported Obama if Obama had conducted himself in the same manner as Trump. They would have said his behaviour should be a disqualifier for presidency, regardless of how much you like his policies. (BTW - I'm not an Obama supporter). There is a lot of hypocrisy in the Republican Party right now.JXL said:quash said:Depends.Sam Lowry said:He doesn't want them talking. Talking is bad!cowboycwr said:
Right on cue Huck shows up to bash Trump on NK even though basically nothing happened while he still ignores that the only reason NK and SK are talking is because of Trump.
Talking to the US president gives cred to a murderous dictator. Which is OK if you get something out of it. Talks were cut short today because of lack of progress.
What have we given up? What have we gotten?
It's odd that all the people screaming about Trump "cozying up to a murderous dictator" had no problems with Obama cozying up to the Castro brothers.
TexasScientist said:That is true. But it goes the other way also. All the people falling on their swords for Trump because they like some of his policies, would be the first to condemn those who supported Obama if Obama had conducted himself in the same manner as Trump. They would have said his behaviour should be a disqualifier for presidency, regardless of how much you like his policies. (BTW - I'm not an Obama supporter). There is a lot of hypocrisy in the Republican Party right now.JXL said:quash said:Depends.Sam Lowry said:He doesn't want them talking. Talking is bad!cowboycwr said:
Right on cue Huck shows up to bash Trump on NK even though basically nothing happened while he still ignores that the only reason NK and SK are talking is because of Trump.
Talking to the US president gives cred to a murderous dictator. Which is OK if you get something out of it. Talks were cut short today because of lack of progress.
What have we given up? What have we gotten?
It's odd that all the people screaming about Trump "cozying up to a murderous dictator" had no problems with Obama cozying up to the Castro brothers.
Haven't seen him walk on water yet. What business success he has had is in large part due to inheritance and following the recommendations of advisors. The policies he wants to pursue can be accomplished without his whimsical methodology. Unless luck prevails, his methods are going to be his downfall. The Southern District of NY is going to be a serious problem for he and his family.Florda_mike said:TexasScientist said:
Seat of the pants/gut feeling: Trump Doctrine.
^^^ Funny the people that have had .0001% of the success in business that Trump has, that come here to advise us of Trump's lack of business or negotiating skills
And once again, Junior shows up to parrot liberal talking points.J.R. said:
And once again that chicken chit Trumps, takes the side of brutal dictator/killer (Kim) relative to the NK regime killing an American citizen. (Otto W). Just like he takes the side of Putin, and MBS. Way to go Trumps. Cozy up to dictators who kill our people because you are so small that you just want those thugs to like you!. Great leadership. Trumps should be ashamed.
Johnny Bear said:And once again, Junior shows up to parrot liberal talking points.J.R. said:
And once again that chicken chit Trumps, takes the side of brutal dictator/killer (Kim) relative to the NK regime killing an American citizen. (Otto W). Just like he takes the side of Putin, and MBS. Way to go Trumps. Cozy up to dictators who kill our people because you are so small that you just want those thugs to like you!. Great leadership. Trumps should be ashamed.
Do you seriously think our current situation with NK would be better if Hillary had won??