But were they attacked? Neither a citizen nor police can kill if they're not in imminent danger.Osodecentx said:But in the opinion of the 3 Georgia defendants, they were defending the community from a criminal and therefore justified. There had been several robberies in the neighborhood. At the time of the killing, a citizens arrest was legal in Georgia.Wangchung said:No. They ceased being any type of hero when they tried to unlawfully detain someone without any proof of a crime being committed. They are murderers.Osodecentx said:Of course not.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:The 3 men who killed Arbery claim to be protecting the community, the same claim you make for Rittenhouse.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:I don't blame youWangchung said:No.Osodecentx said:Do you think the 3 guys who killed Ahmaud Arbery are heroes who were fighting anarchy?Wangchung said:
Disagree on C. When politicians hold back police and allow riots to continue it is up to citizens to step in and stop the violence. Citizens are literally the last line of defense against anarchy.
The man killed by the Georgia defendants wasn't marching for racial justice.
You claim "hero status" for Rittenhouse, yet are silent about the Georgia "heroes"
Do you think the Georgia defendants are heroes, the claim you make for Rittenhouse? If not, please distinguish the 2 cases
You've said that Rittenhouse was defending the community, the same claim made by the Georgia defendants.
Kyle Rittenhouse trial
54,526 Views |
970 Replies |
Last: 1 yr ago by boognish_bear
Bingo! That's all we need to know about your reasoning abilityAmal Shuq-Up said:Osodecentx said:You think Rittenhouse is a hero?Amal Shuq-Up said:Osodecentx said:Disputing it with logic is apparently beyond you.Amal Shuq-Up said:Osodecentx said:But in the opinion of the 3 Georgia defendants, they were defending the community from a criminal and therefore justified. There had been several robberies in the neighborhood. At the time of the killing, a citizens arrest was legal in Georgia.Wangchung said:No. They ceased being any type of hero when they tried to unlawfully detain someone without any proof of a crime being committed. They are murderers.Osodecentx said:Of course not.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:The 3 men who killed Arbery claim to be protecting the community, the same claim you make for Rittenhouse.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:I don't blame youWangchung said:No.Osodecentx said:Do you think the 3 guys who killed Ahmaud Arbery are heroes who were fighting anarchy?Wangchung said:
Disagree on C. When politicians hold back police and allow riots to continue it is up to citizens to step in and stop the violence. Citizens are literally the last line of defense against anarchy.
The man killed by the Georgia defendants wasn't marching for racial justice.
You claim "hero status" for Rittenhouse, yet are silent about the Georgia "heroes"
Do you think the Georgia defendants are heroes, the claim you make for Rittenhouse? If not, please distinguish the 2 cases
You've said that Rittenhouse was defending the community, the same claim made by the Georgia defendants.
Move on to the next windmill, Mr. Quixote.
Bless your heart. I already dismantled your ridiculous analogy.
Darn straight. The riots stopped pretty quick after he did the government's job for it.
The Georgia defendants think they were doing the government's job.
Of course not!! But according to Amal & Wang it depends upon the perception of the vigilante. In their opinion, the defense of the community is justifiable, and that depends on the opinion of the vigilanteSam Lowry said:But were they attacked? Neither a citizen nor police can kill if they're not in imminent danger.Osodecentx said:But in the opinion of the 3 Georgia defendants, they were defending the community from a criminal and therefore justified. There had been several robberies in the neighborhood. At the time of the killing, a citizens arrest was legal in Georgia.Wangchung said:No. They ceased being any type of hero when they tried to unlawfully detain someone without any proof of a crime being committed. They are murderers.Osodecentx said:Of course not.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:The 3 men who killed Arbery claim to be protecting the community, the same claim you make for Rittenhouse.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:I don't blame youWangchung said:No.Osodecentx said:Do you think the 3 guys who killed Ahmaud Arbery are heroes who were fighting anarchy?Wangchung said:
Disagree on C. When politicians hold back police and allow riots to continue it is up to citizens to step in and stop the violence. Citizens are literally the last line of defense against anarchy.
The man killed by the Georgia defendants wasn't marching for racial justice.
You claim "hero status" for Rittenhouse, yet are silent about the Georgia "heroes"
Do you think the Georgia defendants are heroes, the claim you make for Rittenhouse? If not, please distinguish the 2 cases
You've said that Rittenhouse was defending the community, the same claim made by the Georgia defendants.
We both made it clear the distinction lies in the actions of the defendants, and I even specifically stated intent is irrelevant. All that matters is Kyle was defending himself and the three guys in Georgia were not.Osodecentx said:Of course not!! But according to Amal & Wang it depends upon the perception of the vigilante. In their opinion, the defense of the community is justifiable, and that depends on the opinion of the vigilanteSam Lowry said:But were they attacked? Neither a citizen nor police can kill if they're not in imminent danger.Osodecentx said:But in the opinion of the 3 Georgia defendants, they were defending the community from a criminal and therefore justified. There had been several robberies in the neighborhood. At the time of the killing, a citizens arrest was legal in Georgia.Wangchung said:No. They ceased being any type of hero when they tried to unlawfully detain someone without any proof of a crime being committed. They are murderers.Osodecentx said:Of course not.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:The 3 men who killed Arbery claim to be protecting the community, the same claim you make for Rittenhouse.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:I don't blame youWangchung said:No.Osodecentx said:Do you think the 3 guys who killed Ahmaud Arbery are heroes who were fighting anarchy?Wangchung said:
Disagree on C. When politicians hold back police and allow riots to continue it is up to citizens to step in and stop the violence. Citizens are literally the last line of defense against anarchy.
The man killed by the Georgia defendants wasn't marching for racial justice.
You claim "hero status" for Rittenhouse, yet are silent about the Georgia "heroes"
Do you think the Georgia defendants are heroes, the claim you make for Rittenhouse? If not, please distinguish the 2 cases
You've said that Rittenhouse was defending the community, the same claim made by the Georgia defendants.
Osodecentx said:But in the opinion of the 3 Georgia defendants, they were defending the community from a criminal and therefore justified. There had been several robberies in the neighborhood. At the time of the killing, a citizens arrest was legal in Georgia.Wangchung said:No. They ceased being any type of hero when they tried to unlawfully detain someone without any proof of a crime being committed. They are murderers.Osodecentx said:Of course not.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:The 3 men who killed Arbery claim to be protecting the community, the same claim you make for Rittenhouse.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:I don't blame youWangchung said:No.Osodecentx said:Do you think the 3 guys who killed Ahmaud Arbery are heroes who were fighting anarchy?Wangchung said:
Disagree on C. When politicians hold back police and allow riots to continue it is up to citizens to step in and stop the violence. Citizens are literally the last line of defense against anarchy.
The man killed by the Georgia defendants wasn't marching for racial justice.
You claim "hero status" for Rittenhouse, yet are silent about the Georgia "heroes"
Do you think the Georgia defendants are heroes, the claim you make for Rittenhouse? If not, please distinguish the 2 cases
You've said that Rittenhouse was defending the community, the same claim made by the Georgia defendants.
Dude, enough already. We get it.
Do you even remember what you were like before placing your testicles in your wife's purse?
Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Do you believe Rittenhouse is a hero?GrowlTowel said:Osodecentx said:But in the opinion of the 3 Georgia defendants, they were defending the community from a criminal and therefore justified. There had been several robberies in the neighborhood. At the time of the killing, a citizens arrest was legal in Georgia.Wangchung said:No. They ceased being any type of hero when they tried to unlawfully detain someone without any proof of a crime being committed. They are murderers.Osodecentx said:Of course not.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:The 3 men who killed Arbery claim to be protecting the community, the same claim you make for Rittenhouse.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:I don't blame youWangchung said:No.Osodecentx said:Do you think the 3 guys who killed Ahmaud Arbery are heroes who were fighting anarchy?Wangchung said:
Disagree on C. When politicians hold back police and allow riots to continue it is up to citizens to step in and stop the violence. Citizens are literally the last line of defense against anarchy.
The man killed by the Georgia defendants wasn't marching for racial justice.
You claim "hero status" for Rittenhouse, yet are silent about the Georgia "heroes"
Do you think the Georgia defendants are heroes, the claim you make for Rittenhouse? If not, please distinguish the 2 cases
You've said that Rittenhouse was defending the community, the same claim made by the Georgia defendants.
Dude, enough already. We get it.
Do you even remember what you were like before placing your testicles in your wife's purse?
Osodecentx said:Bingo! That's all we need to know about your reasoning abilityAmal Shuq-Up said:Osodecentx said:You think Rittenhouse is a hero?Amal Shuq-Up said:Osodecentx said:Disputing it with logic is apparently beyond you.Amal Shuq-Up said:Osodecentx said:But in the opinion of the 3 Georgia defendants, they were defending the community from a criminal and therefore justified. There had been several robberies in the neighborhood. At the time of the killing, a citizens arrest was legal in Georgia.Wangchung said:No. They ceased being any type of hero when they tried to unlawfully detain someone without any proof of a crime being committed. They are murderers.Osodecentx said:Of course not.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:The 3 men who killed Arbery claim to be protecting the community, the same claim you make for Rittenhouse.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:I don't blame youWangchung said:No.Osodecentx said:Do you think the 3 guys who killed Ahmaud Arbery are heroes who were fighting anarchy?Wangchung said:
Disagree on C. When politicians hold back police and allow riots to continue it is up to citizens to step in and stop the violence. Citizens are literally the last line of defense against anarchy.
The man killed by the Georgia defendants wasn't marching for racial justice.
You claim "hero status" for Rittenhouse, yet are silent about the Georgia "heroes"
Do you think the Georgia defendants are heroes, the claim you make for Rittenhouse? If not, please distinguish the 2 cases
You've said that Rittenhouse was defending the community, the same claim made by the Georgia defendants.
Move on to the next windmill, Mr. Quixote.
Bless your heart. I already dismantled your ridiculous analogy.
Darn straight. The riots stopped pretty quick after he did the government's job for it.
The Georgia defendants think they were doing the government's job.
Hey, stooge. It is about objective facts not the actors subjective opinions of themselves. Your analogy and analysis suck.
GrowlTowel said:Osodecentx said:But in the opinion of the 3 Georgia defendants, they were defending the community from a criminal and therefore justified. There had been several robberies in the neighborhood. At the time of the killing, a citizens arrest was legal in Georgia.Wangchung said:No. They ceased being any type of hero when they tried to unlawfully detain someone without any proof of a crime being committed. They are murderers.Osodecentx said:Of course not.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:The 3 men who killed Arbery claim to be protecting the community, the same claim you make for Rittenhouse.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:I don't blame youWangchung said:No.Osodecentx said:Do you think the 3 guys who killed Ahmaud Arbery are heroes who were fighting anarchy?Wangchung said:
Disagree on C. When politicians hold back police and allow riots to continue it is up to citizens to step in and stop the violence. Citizens are literally the last line of defense against anarchy.
The man killed by the Georgia defendants wasn't marching for racial justice.
You claim "hero status" for Rittenhouse, yet are silent about the Georgia "heroes"
Do you think the Georgia defendants are heroes, the claim you make for Rittenhouse? If not, please distinguish the 2 cases
You've said that Rittenhouse was defending the community, the same claim made by the Georgia defendants.
Dude, enough already. We get it.
Do you even remember what you were like before placing your testicles in your wife's purse?
Are you assuming her/zeh zender?
Osodecentx said:Of course not!! But according to Amal & Wang it depends upon the perception of the vigilante. In their opinion, the defense of the community is justifiable, and that depends on the opinion of the vigilanteSam Lowry said:But were they attacked? Neither a citizen nor police can kill if they're not in imminent danger.Osodecentx said:But in the opinion of the 3 Georgia defendants, they were defending the community from a criminal and therefore justified. There had been several robberies in the neighborhood. At the time of the killing, a citizens arrest was legal in Georgia.Wangchung said:No. They ceased being any type of hero when they tried to unlawfully detain someone without any proof of a crime being committed. They are murderers.Osodecentx said:Of course not.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:The 3 men who killed Arbery claim to be protecting the community, the same claim you make for Rittenhouse.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:I don't blame youWangchung said:No.Osodecentx said:Do you think the 3 guys who killed Ahmaud Arbery are heroes who were fighting anarchy?Wangchung said:
Disagree on C. When politicians hold back police and allow riots to continue it is up to citizens to step in and stop the violence. Citizens are literally the last line of defense against anarchy.
The man killed by the Georgia defendants wasn't marching for racial justice.
You claim "hero status" for Rittenhouse, yet are silent about the Georgia "heroes"
Do you think the Georgia defendants are heroes, the claim you make for Rittenhouse? If not, please distinguish the 2 cases
You've said that Rittenhouse was defending the community, the same claim made by the Georgia defendants.
A claim of self-defense requires that the fear of danger be "reasonable." I don't think the Georgia defendants had a "reasonable" fear of danger.
Also, don't know about Georgia, but in Texas, a citizen's arrest has to be predicated on a felony offense being committed in the person's presence or within his view. If the same is true in Georgia, I don't think the defendants can meet that standard.
AgreedJXL said:Osodecentx said:Of course not!! But according to Amal & Wang it depends upon the perception of the vigilante. In their opinion, the defense of the community is justifiable, and that depends on the opinion of the vigilanteSam Lowry said:But were they attacked? Neither a citizen nor police can kill if they're not in imminent danger.Osodecentx said:But in the opinion of the 3 Georgia defendants, they were defending the community from a criminal and therefore justified. There had been several robberies in the neighborhood. At the time of the killing, a citizens arrest was legal in Georgia.Wangchung said:No. They ceased being any type of hero when they tried to unlawfully detain someone without any proof of a crime being committed. They are murderers.Osodecentx said:Of course not.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:The 3 men who killed Arbery claim to be protecting the community, the same claim you make for Rittenhouse.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:I don't blame youWangchung said:No.Osodecentx said:Do you think the 3 guys who killed Ahmaud Arbery are heroes who were fighting anarchy?Wangchung said:
Disagree on C. When politicians hold back police and allow riots to continue it is up to citizens to step in and stop the violence. Citizens are literally the last line of defense against anarchy.
The man killed by the Georgia defendants wasn't marching for racial justice.
You claim "hero status" for Rittenhouse, yet are silent about the Georgia "heroes"
Do you think the Georgia defendants are heroes, the claim you make for Rittenhouse? If not, please distinguish the 2 cases
You've said that Rittenhouse was defending the community, the same claim made by the Georgia defendants.
A claim of self-defense requires that the fear of danger be "reasonable." I don't think the Georgia defendants had a "reasonable" fear of danger.
Also, don't know about Georgia, but in Texas, a citizen's arrest has to be predicated on a felony offense being committed in the person's presence or within his view. If the same is true in Georgia, I don't think the defendants can meet that standard.
This makes absolutely no sense. Seriously, what was he protecting the community or whatever he was protecting from? You don't carry a weapon as a risk warning in a security situation unless you are willing to use it in the performance of your duties. He used it in self defense and that's precisely why he brought it to Kenosha. That and probably to play tough.Sam Lowry said:He wasn't there to stop the riots, step in for police, or engage in battle. You don't have to do any of those things to protect the community. Putting out fires is protecting. Standing between rioters and property is protecting. That doesn't change because he retreated when attacked. It just means he was doing the right thing. Having the weapon still makes it harder on the insurrect -- sorry, on the protesters, because it lets him work safely and lets them know there's a risk in violently interfering.ATL Bear said:He couldn't even stop them from lighting a dumpster on fire and you're convinced somehow the riots were going to be stopped by him and the others out there? What did you think was going to happen? Are you advocating open gun battles?Wangchung said:
Disagree on C. When politicians hold back police and allow riots to continue it is up to citizens to step in and stop the violence. Citizens are literally the last line of defense against anarchy.
He grabbed the barrel of the gun…Sam Lowry said:But were they attacked? Neither a citizen nor police can kill if they're not in imminent danger.Osodecentx said:But in the opinion of the 3 Georgia defendants, they were defending the community from a criminal and therefore justified. There had been several robberies in the neighborhood. At the time of the killing, a citizens arrest was legal in Georgia.Wangchung said:No. They ceased being any type of hero when they tried to unlawfully detain someone without any proof of a crime being committed. They are murderers.Osodecentx said:Of course not.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:The 3 men who killed Arbery claim to be protecting the community, the same claim you make for Rittenhouse.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:I don't blame youWangchung said:No.Osodecentx said:Do you think the 3 guys who killed Ahmaud Arbery are heroes who were fighting anarchy?Wangchung said:
Disagree on C. When politicians hold back police and allow riots to continue it is up to citizens to step in and stop the violence. Citizens are literally the last line of defense against anarchy.
The man killed by the Georgia defendants wasn't marching for racial justice.
You claim "hero status" for Rittenhouse, yet are silent about the Georgia "heroes"
Do you think the Georgia defendants are heroes, the claim you make for Rittenhouse? If not, please distinguish the 2 cases
You've said that Rittenhouse was defending the community, the same claim made by the Georgia defendants.
Any violence whatsoever, crack some skulls and make some arrests. Time for zero tolerance for this
b u l l s h i t!!!! Black, white, brown, red, or yellow. You **ck up, get your skull cracked!
b u l l s h i t!!!! Black, white, brown, red, or yellow. You **ck up, get your skull cracked!
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:
Any violence whatsoever, crack some skulls and make some arrests. Time for zero tolerance for this
b u l l s h i t!!!! Black, white, brown, red, or yellow. You **ck up, get your skull cracked!
NON LETHAL ASS-SHOOTING OF VIOLENT RIOTERS
That and, I'll say it again, sniper hides. We need the army of experienced hunters we have across the US to set up sniper hides outside riot centers and start shooting violent rioters in the ass from 200m with .22lr. You light a fire, you get shot in the ass. You break a window, you get shot in the ass. You attack someone, you get shot in the ass…unless more force is required.
The news would almost be forced to claim there was an "ass shooting" at the mostly peaceful riots. No one would die. They'd be out for months recovering from the ass shot and many would probably lose their ability to procreate too. It's a complete win for civilized society.
Imagine Anderson Cooper or Don Lemon reporting that someone is aiming at the asses of young Democrats. Imagine having to report 10-12 non lethal shootings…all in the ass. Imagine the embarrassment of being one of the violent mob who was part of the "ass shooting ". This could be glorious.
You're trying to compare Arbery to Rittenhouse as if Wangchung is trying to defend the Arbery character too, which he is not. The defendants in Georgia are trying to paint themselves as a hero. Wangchung does not agree with their opinion. You analogy is apples an oranges. Often, people have 2 separate opinions over similar incidents. I said similar, not identical.You're trying to make these two cases identical. They are not.Osodecentx said:But in the opinion of the 3 Georgia defendants, they were defending the community from a criminal and therefore justified. There had been several robberies in the neighborhood. At the time of the killing, a citizens arrest was legal in Georgia.Wangchung said:No. They ceased being any type of hero when they tried to unlawfully detain someone without any proof of a crime being committed. They are murderers.Osodecentx said:Of course not.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:The 3 men who killed Arbery claim to be protecting the community, the same claim you make for Rittenhouse.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:I don't blame youWangchung said:No.Osodecentx said:Do you think the 3 guys who killed Ahmaud Arbery are heroes who were fighting anarchy?Wangchung said:
Disagree on C. When politicians hold back police and allow riots to continue it is up to citizens to step in and stop the violence. Citizens are literally the last line of defense against anarchy.
The man killed by the Georgia defendants wasn't marching for racial justice.
You claim "hero status" for Rittenhouse, yet are silent about the Georgia "heroes"
Do you think the Georgia defendants are heroes, the claim you make for Rittenhouse? If not, please distinguish the 2 cases
You've said that Rittenhouse was defending the community, the same claim made by the Georgia defendants.
Osodecentx said:Do you believe Rittenhouse is a hero?GrowlTowel said:Osodecentx said:But in the opinion of the 3 Georgia defendants, they were defending the community from a criminal and therefore justified. There had been several robberies in the neighborhood. At the time of the killing, a citizens arrest was legal in Georgia.Wangchung said:No. They ceased being any type of hero when they tried to unlawfully detain someone without any proof of a crime being committed. They are murderers.Osodecentx said:Of course not.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:The 3 men who killed Arbery claim to be protecting the community, the same claim you make for Rittenhouse.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:I don't blame youWangchung said:No.Osodecentx said:Do you think the 3 guys who killed Ahmaud Arbery are heroes who were fighting anarchy?Wangchung said:
Disagree on C. When politicians hold back police and allow riots to continue it is up to citizens to step in and stop the violence. Citizens are literally the last line of defense against anarchy.
The man killed by the Georgia defendants wasn't marching for racial justice.
You claim "hero status" for Rittenhouse, yet are silent about the Georgia "heroes"
Do you think the Georgia defendants are heroes, the claim you make for Rittenhouse? If not, please distinguish the 2 cases
You've said that Rittenhouse was defending the community, the same claim made by the Georgia defendants.
Dude, enough already. We get it.
Do you even remember what you were like before placing your testicles in your wife's purse?
Absolutely. Dude ****ed up scumbags when police acted like you. Honestly, my favorite people are those Koreans that shot people during the Rodney King riots that were trying to rob their convenience store. I root for every citizen to blow away rioters.
Pass the ammunition and God Bless America.
This kid did more for America than Felonious Floyd ever thought about.
Think of the tax savings. One 17 year old took out a pedophile and a wife beater Hell yes he is a hero.
Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Rawhide said:You're trying to compare Arbery to Rittenhouse as if Wangchung is trying to defend the Arbery character too, which he is not. The defendants in Georgia are trying to paint themselves as a hero. Wangchung does not agree with their opinion. You analogy is apples an oranges. Often, people have 2 separate opinions over similar incidents. I said similar, not identical.You're trying to make these two cases identical. They are not.Osodecentx said:But in the opinion of the 3 Georgia defendants, they were defending the community from a criminal and therefore justified. There had been several robberies in the neighborhood. At the time of the killing, a citizens arrest was legal in Georgia.Wangchung said:No. They ceased being any type of hero when they tried to unlawfully detain someone without any proof of a crime being committed. They are murderers.Osodecentx said:Of course not.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:The 3 men who killed Arbery claim to be protecting the community, the same claim you make for Rittenhouse.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:I don't blame youWangchung said:No.Osodecentx said:Do you think the 3 guys who killed Ahmaud Arbery are heroes who were fighting anarchy?Wangchung said:
Disagree on C. When politicians hold back police and allow riots to continue it is up to citizens to step in and stop the violence. Citizens are literally the last line of defense against anarchy.
The man killed by the Georgia defendants wasn't marching for racial justice.
You claim "hero status" for Rittenhouse, yet are silent about the Georgia "heroes"
Do you think the Georgia defendants are heroes, the claim you make for Rittenhouse? If not, please distinguish the 2 cases
You've said that Rittenhouse was defending the community, the same claim made by the Georgia defendants.
Give up. Dude has no testicles and is out of tampons.
Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Wow. This anecdote from @NellieBowles about how the NYT wouldn't publish her story on the damage done by the Kenosha riots until after the election is really damning. https://t.co/35jG248iya pic.twitter.com/O3nRi6mu9w
— Mark Hemingway (@Heminator) November 19, 2021
GrowlTowel said:Honestly, my favorite people are those Koreans that shot people during the Rodney King riots that were trying to rob their convenience store. I root for every citizen to blow away rioters.Osodecentx said:Do you believe Rittenhouse is a hero?GrowlTowel said:Osodecentx said:But in the opinion of the 3 Georgia defendants, they were defending the community from a criminal and therefore justified. There had been several robberies in the neighborhood. At the time of the killing, a citizens arrest was legal in Georgia.Wangchung said:No. They ceased being any type of hero when they tried to unlawfully detain someone without any proof of a crime being committed. They are murderers.Osodecentx said:Of course not.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:The 3 men who killed Arbery claim to be protecting the community, the same claim you make for Rittenhouse.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:I don't blame youWangchung said:No.Osodecentx said:Do you think the 3 guys who killed Ahmaud Arbery are heroes who were fighting anarchy?Wangchung said:
Disagree on C. When politicians hold back police and allow riots to continue it is up to citizens to step in and stop the violence. Citizens are literally the last line of defense against anarchy.
The man killed by the Georgia defendants wasn't marching for racial justice.
You claim "hero status" for Rittenhouse, yet are silent about the Georgia "heroes"
Do you think the Georgia defendants are heroes, the claim you make for Rittenhouse? If not, please distinguish the 2 cases
You've said that Rittenhouse was defending the community, the same claim made by the Georgia defendants.
Dude, enough already. We get it.
Do you even remember what you were like before placing your testicles in your wife's purse?
I remember those Koreans !
On the roof tops of their businesses with rifles …..making sure everything they had ever worked for wasn't set ablaze by hundreds of looters .
They were definitely heroes .
And none of them were ever arrested if I recall.
You're being intentionally obtuse. Kyle Rittenhouse was the victim in his scenario, Ahmad Arbury was the victim in his. NO ONE on this thread is drawing a correlation between Kyle and the fat racist scumbags who shot Arbury other than you.Osodecentx said:AgreedJXL said:Osodecentx said:Of course not!! But according to Amal & Wang it depends upon the perception of the vigilante. In their opinion, the defense of the community is justifiable, and that depends on the opinion of the vigilanteSam Lowry said:But were they attacked? Neither a citizen nor police can kill if they're not in imminent danger.Osodecentx said:But in the opinion of the 3 Georgia defendants, they were defending the community from a criminal and therefore justified. There had been several robberies in the neighborhood. At the time of the killing, a citizens arrest was legal in Georgia.Wangchung said:No. They ceased being any type of hero when they tried to unlawfully detain someone without any proof of a crime being committed. They are murderers.Osodecentx said:Of course not.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:The 3 men who killed Arbery claim to be protecting the community, the same claim you make for Rittenhouse.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:I don't blame youWangchung said:No.Osodecentx said:Do you think the 3 guys who killed Ahmaud Arbery are heroes who were fighting anarchy?Wangchung said:
Disagree on C. When politicians hold back police and allow riots to continue it is up to citizens to step in and stop the violence. Citizens are literally the last line of defense against anarchy.
The man killed by the Georgia defendants wasn't marching for racial justice.
You claim "hero status" for Rittenhouse, yet are silent about the Georgia "heroes"
Do you think the Georgia defendants are heroes, the claim you make for Rittenhouse? If not, please distinguish the 2 cases
You've said that Rittenhouse was defending the community, the same claim made by the Georgia defendants.
A claim of self-defense requires that the fear of danger be "reasonable." I don't think the Georgia defendants had a "reasonable" fear of danger.
Also, don't know about Georgia, but in Texas, a citizen's arrest has to be predicated on a felony offense being committed in the person's presence or within his view. If the same is true in Georgia, I don't think the defendants can meet that standard.
Here's the real question. Why does the media have such a hardon for the Rittenhouse trial while completely ignoring the Arbury trial? Arbury's fits the narrative they're trying to sell that America is filled with white supremacists and black people are in constant danger of being killed. That case is pretty clear cut. Why aren't they covering it with the same fervor?
They have to keep doubling down on their lies to justify the looting and rioting of last summer. They have to make sure everyday citizens don't realize the power they have in standing up to the media, cancel culture, and the woke mob. If 50 Kyle Rittenhouses had marched out in Kenosha and stood up for decent, hardworking people who's livelihoods were being destroyed, many of these rioters would have packed up and went home. Now imagine 100, 1,000, etc.
About heroes:
I wasn't going to call Kyle Rittenhouse a hero until I learned that he went to put out fires, protect property and help the injured. He only took his gun for self-defense, and the facts prove that was a wise decision.
Now about heroes in general. Back in 1836, a bunch of men in Tennessee took it upon themselves to travel to Texas and provide support for a bunch of rebels in what we now call San Antonio. Some may say they were foolhardy, some would say they were looking for trouble, but a lot of people call them Heroes of the Alamo now.
Spin affects how people talk about things, sure. Bias also plays into it. But the facts are all on Kyle's side, with only vitriol and malice on the prosecutor's side, and underlying the MSM's account of these events.
I wasn't going to call Kyle Rittenhouse a hero until I learned that he went to put out fires, protect property and help the injured. He only took his gun for self-defense, and the facts prove that was a wise decision.
Now about heroes in general. Back in 1836, a bunch of men in Tennessee took it upon themselves to travel to Texas and provide support for a bunch of rebels in what we now call San Antonio. Some may say they were foolhardy, some would say they were looking for trouble, but a lot of people call them Heroes of the Alamo now.
Spin affects how people talk about things, sure. Bias also plays into it. But the facts are all on Kyle's side, with only vitriol and malice on the prosecutor's side, and underlying the MSM's account of these events.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Redbrickbear said:Pretty simple.Forest Bueller_bf said:
Any insight from our Lawyer friends as to why this verdict is taking so long.
There are a few AFWLs on the jury determined to convict Kyle.
And there are also a few legacy midwestern men on the jury who won't to pushed or harangued into voting him guilty.
You have no way of knowing that. You could make a living as a pundit.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Shooter? I think you missed this.ShooterTX said:Wow. This anecdote from @NellieBowles about how the NYT wouldn't publish her story on the damage done by the Kenosha riots until after the election is really damning. https://t.co/35jG248iya pic.twitter.com/O3nRi6mu9w
— Mark Hemingway (@Heminator) November 19, 2021
"Sorry, did you just call me a pedophile based on my posts? Which ones?"
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
BLM needs to get a handle on letting fools like this become their "spokespeople".Jack Bauer said:
Another one of the ADA's "heroes"Tanya James, of Arkansas, crossed state lines to get to the #Kenosha courthouse where she suggests over a bullhorn that Kyle #Rittenhouse should have been killed.
— Andy Ngô 🏳️🌈 (@MrAndyNgo) November 19, 2021
“Kyle should have never made it to trial! Bring that bitch to my neck of the mother f—ing…” pic.twitter.com/SdVr1r0FUC
I would have walked out and muzzled her right away if I was part of the actual organization.
Forest Bueller_bf said:BLM needs to get a handle on letting fools like this become their "spokespeople".Jack Bauer said:
Another one of the ADA's "heroes"Tanya James, of Arkansas, crossed state lines to get to the #Kenosha courthouse where she suggests over a bullhorn that Kyle #Rittenhouse should have been killed.
— Andy Ngô 🏳️🌈 (@MrAndyNgo) November 19, 2021
“Kyle should have never made it to trial! Bring that bitch to my neck of the mother f—ing…” pic.twitter.com/SdVr1r0FUC
I would have walked out and muzzled her right away if I was part of the actual organization.
There is no national organization, there are no spokespeople on a national basis. Both sides just have people who know how to get attention.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Why does she talk like she is an urban black?Forest Bueller_bf said:BLM needs to get a handle on letting fools like this become their "spokespeople".Jack Bauer said:
Another one of the ADA's "heroes"Tanya James, of Arkansas, crossed state lines to get to the #Kenosha courthouse where she suggests over a bullhorn that Kyle #Rittenhouse should have been killed.
— Andy Ngô 🏳️🌈 (@MrAndyNgo) November 19, 2021
“Kyle should have never made it to trial! Bring that bitch to my neck of the mother f—ing…” pic.twitter.com/SdVr1r0FUC
I would have walked out and muzzled her right away if I was part of the actual organization.
Isn't that cultural appropriation?
So weird how one of the BLM leaders just bought a bunch of mansions but they don't have any organization.quash said:Forest Bueller_bf said:BLM needs to get a handle on letting fools like this become their "spokespeople".Jack Bauer said:
Another one of the ADA's "heroes"Tanya James, of Arkansas, crossed state lines to get to the #Kenosha courthouse where she suggests over a bullhorn that Kyle #Rittenhouse should have been killed.
— Andy Ngô 🏳️🌈 (@MrAndyNgo) November 19, 2021
“Kyle should have never made it to trial! Bring that bitch to my neck of the mother f—ing…” pic.twitter.com/SdVr1r0FUC
I would have walked out and muzzled her right away if I was part of the actual organization.
There is no national organization, there are no spokespeople on a national basis. Both sides just have people who know how to get attention.
Who is on the other side?quash said:Forest Bueller_bf said:BLM needs to get a handle on letting fools like this become their "spokespeople".Jack Bauer said:
Another one of the ADA's "heroes"Tanya James, of Arkansas, crossed state lines to get to the #Kenosha courthouse where she suggests over a bullhorn that Kyle #Rittenhouse should have been killed.
— Andy Ngô 🏳️🌈 (@MrAndyNgo) November 19, 2021
“Kyle should have never made it to trial! Bring that bitch to my neck of the mother f—ing…” pic.twitter.com/SdVr1r0FUC
I would have walked out and muzzled her right away if I was part of the actual organization.
There is no national organization, there are no spokespeople on a national basis. Both sides just have people who know how to get attention.
Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
After four days+ of deliberations, it is kinda looking like the jury is gonna **** this up. This may be the most shocking verdict since OJ butchered Nicole. They may put this kid away for life.
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"
-- Barack Obama
-- Barack Obama
I don't believe any of them are "heroes".Osodecentx said:Do you believe Rittenhouse is a hero?GrowlTowel said:Osodecentx said:But in the opinion of the 3 Georgia defendants, they were defending the community from a criminal and therefore justified. There had been several robberies in the neighborhood. At the time of the killing, a citizens arrest was legal in Georgia.Wangchung said:No. They ceased being any type of hero when they tried to unlawfully detain someone without any proof of a crime being committed. They are murderers.Osodecentx said:Of course not.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:The 3 men who killed Arbery claim to be protecting the community, the same claim you make for Rittenhouse.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:I don't blame youWangchung said:No.Osodecentx said:Do you think the 3 guys who killed Ahmaud Arbery are heroes who were fighting anarchy?Wangchung said:
Disagree on C. When politicians hold back police and allow riots to continue it is up to citizens to step in and stop the violence. Citizens are literally the last line of defense against anarchy.
The man killed by the Georgia defendants wasn't marching for racial justice.
You claim "hero status" for Rittenhouse, yet are silent about the Georgia "heroes"
Do you think the Georgia defendants are heroes, the claim you make for Rittenhouse? If not, please distinguish the 2 cases
You've said that Rittenhouse was defending the community, the same claim made by the Georgia defendants.
Dude, enough already. We get it.
Do you even remember what you were like before placing your testicles in your wife's purse?
I do believe Rittenhouse is innocent via self defense.
I do believe the 3 Georgians are guilty of murder because this was not self defense.
In Rittenhouse's case he was being attacked himself. The Georgians attacked Arbery.
I'm thinking they'll be declared a hung jury before they convict, but who knows? They may give the violent mob more power.RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:
After four days+ of deliberations, it is kinda looking like the jury is gonna **** this up. This may be the most shocking verdict since OJ butchered Nicole. They may put this kid away for life.
Denial is common among those who refuse to face their own poor moral choices.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Verdict incoming.....
Not guilty all counts