Rawhide said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

So, now that Trump's place has been raided, do you think the FBI will have some time to go after Epstein's clients now?

---

Well, they did just raid the home of one man accused of raping a 13yr old Epstein girl...

---

Oh snap! Looky there, a picture of Trump with Epstein in a hallway not having sex with a 13 year old. Well, if that's your barometer, I can do this lame crap all day long. You're the biggest partisan idiot on this board, humckleberry. After all, you were the only idiot trying to defent dementia joe during his fubar'd Afghanistan pullout. Aren't you the dumbass that tried to suggest that the laptop didn't belong to hunter biden too?

---

Rawhide 1
Comrade Shmuck 0

Fun fact, the picture of Trump and Epstein I posted was taken in Mar a Lago. I don't care about Bill, burn him down too I say. Y'all are the ones with your panties in a twist whenever someone points out the Trump/Epstein connections, which is a pretty unsubtle tell for who the partisans in this exchange are.

Maybe they found the pee pee tapes we were promised existed. I want pee pee tapes!!!

Rawhide said:

---

Anyone know on what grounds?

---

From NYTimes:
The F.B.I. would have needed to convince a judge that it had probable cause that a crime had been committed, and that agents might find evidence at Mar-a-Lago, to get a search warrant. Proceeding with a search on a former president's home would almost surely have required sign-off from top officials at the bureau and the Justice Department.

Osodecentx said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

Anyone know on what grounds?

---

From NYTimes:
The F.B.I. would have needed to convince a judge that it had probable cause that a crime had been committed, and that agents might find evidence at Mar-a-Lago, to get a search warrant. Proceeding with a search on a former president's home would almost surely have required sign-off from top officials at the bureau and the Justice Department.

---

Kind of like when they got the FISA warrant to spy on the Trump campaign.

HuMcK said:

---

Fun fact, the picture of Trump and Epstein I posted was taken in Mar a Lago. I don't care about Bill, burn him down too I say. Y'all are the ones with your panties in a twist whenever someone points out the Trump/Epstein connections, which is a pretty unsubtle tell for who the partisans in this exchange are.

---

Actually, we don't care that Trump knows who Epstein was and GASP! He even spooke to him.

The partisan here (that's you) tries to make more out of that and anything else that has do do with Trump - all the time (Russia Russia Russia, anyone?)

Face ot humckleberry, Trump lives rent free in your head - all day everyday.

Rawhide said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

So, now that Trump's place has been raided, do you think the FBI will have some time to go after Epstein's clients now?

---

Well, they did just raid the home of one man accused of raping a 13yr old Epstein girl...

---

Oh snap! Looky there, a picture of Trump with Epstein in a hallway not having sex with a 13 year old. Well, if that's your barometer, I can do this lame crap all day long. You're the biggest partisan idiot on this board, humckleberry. After all, you were the only idiot trying to defent dementia joe during his fubar'd Afghanistan pullout. Aren't you the dumbass that tried to suggest that the laptop didn't belong to hunter biden too?

---

Epstein provided underage sex partners to B. Clinton, therefore Trump gets to violate whatever laws he wants to.

Stefano DiMera said:

---

A FBI investigation by a Republican Director handpicked by Trump himself.

Yep..seems political to me. Enjoy your bunk next to hopefully Alex Jones and the ghost of Jeffrey Epstein.

---

Anyone who can't comprehend the ramifications of a past president of one party...... having his house raided by the KGB.....upon the orders of the opposing political party currently in power .....is too dumb for words.


EVERY president throughout American history has made decisions that angered the opposition party . Decisions that some...in their zeal for power...wanted 'retribution '.

Every single president throughout American history has had detractors who felt 'justified' in killing him for some real or imagined 'crime'.

At the very least a precedent has been established that all future presidents will be intensely aware of....the possibility of jail time ( or worse ) the moment they leave office.

So they will be even more determined to STAY in power...or make sure their party cronies replace them .
In addition decisions of future presidents will now be impacted by the fear of 'legal' retribution when their term is up.

HuMcK said:

---

Fun fact, the picture of Trump and Epstein I posted was taken in Mar a Lago. I don't care about Bill, burn him down too I say. Y'all are the ones with your panties in a twist whenever someone points out the Trump/Epstein connections, which is a pretty unsubtle tell for who the partisans in this exchange are.

---

Man, the irony is thick this morning...

Osodecentx said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

Anyone know on what grounds?

---

From NYTimes:
The F.B.I. would have needed to convince a judge that it had probable cause that a crime had been committed, and that agents might find evidence at Mar-a-Lago, to get a search warrant. Proceeding with a search on a former president's home would almost surely have required sign-off from top officials at the bureau and the Justice Department.

---

A reply that has zero to do with my actual question.

My questions has since been answered by various new outlets. It appears "the grounds" has to do with classified docs.

Osodecentx said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

So, now that Trump's place has been raided, do you think the FBI will have some time to go after Epstein's clients now?

---

Well, they did just raid the home of one man accused of raping a 13yr old Epstein girl...

---

Oh snap! Looky there, a picture of Trump with Epstein in a hallway not having sex with a 13 year old. Well, if that's your barometer, I can do this lame crap all day long. You're the biggest partisan idiot on this board, humckleberry. After all, you were the only idiot trying to defent dementia joe during his fubar'd Afghanistan pullout. Aren't you the dumbass that tried to suggest that the laptop didn't belong to hunter biden too?

---

Epstein provided underage sex partners to B. Clinton, therefore Trump gets to violate whatever laws he wants to.

---

Epstein's defense lawyer is the judge who signed off on this raid…

Osodecentx said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

So, now that Trump's place has been raided, do you think the FBI will have some time to go after Epstein's clients now?

---

Well, they did just raid the home of one man accused of raping a 13yr old Epstein girl...

---

Oh snap! Looky there, a picture of Trump with Epstein in a hallway not having sex with a 13 year old. Well, if that's your barometer, I can do this lame crap all day long. You're the biggest partisan idiot on this board, humckleberry. After all, you were the only idiot trying to defent dementia joe during his fubar'd Afghanistan pullout. Aren't you the dumbass that tried to suggest that the laptop didn't belong to hunter biden too?

---

Epstein provided underage sex partners to B. Clinton, therefore Trump gets to violate whatever laws he wants to.

---

Oso in again with another reply that has zero to do with what I said. Your lack of ability to comprehend is astounding.

Either that, or you just try to twist what people say into something they didn't. In which case would make you full of horse*****

Bruce Reinhart who helped Epstein get off and then went on to represent Epstein’s accomplices is THE JUDGE who signed off on the FBI raiding President Trump. If you wrote that into a movie script the studio would laugh at you because it’s such unbelievable corruption.

— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) August 9, 2022

Bruce Reinhart: Helped sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein escape any real justice.

Merrick Garland: Trump took his nomination to the Supreme Court away.

Chris Wray: FBI Chief Trump tried to fire over his horrific job performance.

All signed off on raiding President Trump.

— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) August 9, 2022

Mothra said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Fun fact, the picture of Trump and Epstein I posted was taken in Mar a Lago. I don't care about Bill, burn him down too I say. Y'all are the ones with your panties in a twist whenever someone points out the Trump/Epstein connections, which is a pretty unsubtle tell for who the partisans in this exchange are.

---

Man, the irony is thick this morning...

---

The ignorance and shortsightedness is thick as well.

But hardly surprising .

This raid by the KGB means an end of democracy as we have known it .

Anyone who believes this radical Dem party who ordered the raid...... is now willingly going to release control of the house and senate this November .....is blind .

One way or another...votes or no votes.....Dems are going to hold onto both chambers of Congress.

And the pace of 'change' is going to accelerate .

We are watching the beginning....of the final acts of an internal coup that began almost 15 years ago.

Rawhide said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

So, now that Trump's place has been raided, do you think the FBI will have some time to go after Epstein's clients now?

---

Well, they did just raid the home of one man accused of raping a 13yr old Epstein girl...

---

Oh snap! Looky there, a picture of Trump with Epstein in a hallway not having sex with a 13 year old. Well, if that's your barometer, I can do this lame crap all day long. You're the biggest partisan idiot on this board, humckleberry. After all, you were the only idiot trying to defent dementia joe during his fubar'd Afghanistan pullout. Aren't you the dumbass that tried to suggest that the laptop didn't belong to hunter biden too?

---

Epstein provided underage sex partners to B. Clinton, therefore Trump gets to violate whatever laws he wants to.

---

Oso in again with another reply that has zero to do with what I said. Your lack of ability to comprehend is astounding.

Either that, or you just try to twist what people say into something they didn't. In which case would make you full of horse*****

---

I thought you were claiming Trump's innocence by pointing out the probable crimes of another president.

Canada2017 said:

---

Mothra said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Fun fact, the picture of Trump and Epstein I posted was taken in Mar a Lago. I don't care about Bill, burn him down too I say. Y'all are the ones with your panties in a twist whenever someone points out the Trump/Epstein connections, which is a pretty unsubtle tell for who the partisans in this exchange are.

---

Man, the irony is thick this morning...

---

One way or another...votes or no votes.....Dems are going to hold onto both chambers of Congress.

---

The Republican nominees in Georgia, Arizona, and Pennsylvania make it difficult for the GOP to regain the Senate.
Self inflicted wounds will keep Schumer as majority leader

If the republicans weren't so spineless, these actions by the democrats would be the start of a slippery slope. The democrats know the republicans in power don't have the intestinal fortitude to take similar actions on political enemies. I'm not a fan of trump, but this is exactly why they are so scared of trump - he actually is as reckless as the democrats are when he comes to maintaining democracy and has the guts to take similar actions they would take.

contrario said:

---

If the republicans weren't so spineless, these actions by the democrats would be the start of a slippery slope. The democrats know the republicans in power don't have the intestinal fortitude to take similar actions on political enemies. I'm not a fan of trump, but this is exactly why they are so scared of trump - he actually is as reckless as the democrats are when he comes to maintaining democracy and has the guts to take similar actions they would take.

---

Radical Dems are never going to give up power now......under any circumstances.

They are going to push even harder for control of the federal courts and IRS.

Osodecentx said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

So, now that Trump's place has been raided, do you think the FBI will have some time to go after Epstein's clients now?

---

Well, they did just raid the home of one man accused of raping a 13yr old Epstein girl...

---

Oh snap! Looky there, a picture of Trump with Epstein in a hallway not having sex with a 13 year old. Well, if that's your barometer, I can do this lame crap all day long. You're the biggest partisan idiot on this board, humckleberry. After all, you were the only idiot trying to defent dementia joe during his fubar'd Afghanistan pullout. Aren't you the dumbass that tried to suggest that the laptop didn't belong to hunter biden too?

---

Epstein provided underage sex partners to B. Clinton, therefore Trump gets to violate whatever laws he wants to.

---

Oso in again with another reply that has zero to do with what I said. Your lack of ability to comprehend is astounding.

Either that, or you just try to twist what people say into something they didn't. In which case would make you full of horse*****

---

I thought you were claiming Trump's innocence by pointing out the probable crimes of another president.

---

You thought wrong.

Partisan boob, humckleberry, tried to make a joke followed up a lame ass photos of Trump speaking to Epstein in a hallway. I showed that the joke was on him.

Rawhide said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

So, now that Trump's place has been raided, do you think the FBI will have some time to go after Epstein's clients now?

---

Well, they did just raid the home of one man accused of raping a 13yr old Epstein girl...

---

Oh snap! Looky there, a picture of Trump with Epstein in a hallway not having sex with a 13 year old. Well, if that's your barometer, I can do this lame crap all day long. You're the biggest partisan idiot on this board, humckleberry. After all, you were the only idiot trying to defent dementia joe during his fubar'd Afghanistan pullout. Aren't you the dumbass that tried to suggest that the laptop didn't belong to hunter biden too?

---

Epstein provided underage sex partners to B. Clinton, therefore Trump gets to violate whatever laws he wants to.

---

Oso in again with another reply that has zero to do with what I said. Your lack of ability to comprehend is astounding.

Either that, or you just try to twist what people say into something they didn't. In which case would make you full of horse*****

---

I thought you were claiming Trump's innocence by pointing out the probable crimes of another president.

---

You thought wrong.

Partisan boob, humckleberry, tried to make a joke followed up a lame ass photos of Trump speaking to Epstein in a hallway. I showed that the joke was on him.

---

Sorry

There are those who are wondering how many of the seized documents were even at Mar-a-Largo before the marauders arrived.

Um… same judge? pic.twitter.com/8VQwm3bO5r

— Dakota (@dkbent1) August 9, 2022

4th and Inches said:

---

Um… same judge? pic.twitter.com/8VQwm3bO5r

— Dakota (@dkbent1) August 9, 2022

---

Tell me what you think it means (former Epstein lawyer/now magistrate) signed the search warrant

A few observations:

1) What Evidence? - Raiding the home of a former President and potential future candidate is a historic event; There had better be rock-solid probable cause, or this really is an incredibly destabilizing move.

2) Merrick Garland - There is absolutely no way in the world that this happened without Merrick Garland's approval and consent. None. Whether or not it was justified I will leave until I see the evidence that supported the warrant. For the sake of this country, it had better be absolutely, unequivocally solid.

3) Trump - Before I know what was looked for and the basis for probably cause, it is hard to know Trump's culpability. And while I can certainly argue that there is a ridiculous double-standard when it comes to Republicans being investigated, in isolation, I cannot say that this wasn't justified without seeing the evidence. Trump is certainly capably of breaking the law if he thinks it is in his interest. But whether he actually did or not, I do not yet know and, outside of the DOJ and Trump, no one does.

4) A Magistrate Judge? - Not atypical for a Magistrate judge to sign a search warrant, but this is not a typical situation. I'm very surprised they went with a Magistrate judge, who is NOT an Article III judge (i.e. not appointed for life but rather appointed by a majority vote of the district judges). I would have thought that they would certainly go for an Article III full federal judge on this.

OsoCoreyell said:

---

A few observations:

1) What Evidence? - Raiding the home of a former President and potential future candidate is a historic event; There had better be rock-solid probable cause, or this really is an incredibly destabilizing move.

2) Merrick Garland - There is absolutely no way in the world that this happened without Merrick Garland's approval and consent. None. Whether or not it was justified I will leave until I see the evidence that supported the warrant. For the sake of this country, it had better be absolutely, unequivocally solid.

3) Trump - Before I know what was looked for and the basis for probably cause, it is hard to know Trump's culpability. And while I can certainly argue that there is a ridiculous double-standard when it comes to Republicans being investigated, in isolation, I cannot say that this wasn't justified without seeing the evidence. Trump is certainly capably of breaking the law if he thinks it is in his interest. But whether he actually did or not, I do not yet know and, outside of the DOJ and Trump, no one does.

---

Good grief

Does anyone think Dems are going to let a little issue like lack of evidence hinder them at this point ?

They unleased a firestorm throughout the country ....and Dems no doubt planned for such a reaction .

As a result I am totally confident the KGB will find 'evidence' even if is a comic book or ( shocking ) planted by KGB agents .

Take the blinders off fellas.....we have entered a totally new chapter in US history and all pre conceived notions of our law enforcement agencies and judicial systems are outdated.

Osodecentx said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Um… same judge? pic.twitter.com/8VQwm3bO5r

— Dakota (@dkbent1) August 9, 2022

---

Tell me what you think it means (former Epstein lawyer/now magistrate) signed the search warrant

---

Far Left individual. Wow, Trump must be involved with Epstein and his Lolita Island for his personal lawyer to sign off on this document. I bet they find proof of him being on the island and abusing minors. I can't wait until Trump is in jail for life.

Far Right individual. Wow. Those snakes had to dip into the pool of the most corrupt Judge imaginable to find someone to sign off on this garbage, just another Nazi move by the left. They are the ones trying to overthrow the government as we know it. They prove it more every day.

Independent.. When is this partisan garbage going to come to an end, this is something I've never seen before, partisan politcs have reached a low on both sides, it seems worse than I've seen before. I'm not sure I will have anybody to vote for come 2024, and I'm not sure I want to vote for anybody at this point.

contrario said:

---

If the republicans weren't so spineless, these actions by the democrats would be the start of a slippery slope. The democrats know the republicans in power don't have the intestinal fortitude to take similar actions on political enemies. I'm not a fan of trump, but this is exactly why they are so scared of trump - he actually is as reckless as the democrats are when he comes to maintaining democracy and has the guts to take similar actions they would take.

---

Republicans impeached Bill for lying about a blow job, an accusation that was spun out of multiple separate years long investigations. They investigated Hillary for essentially the same thing Trump is being investigated for now, which was spun out of one of a dozen or so partisan Benghazi investigations. That investigation and the GOP weaponization of it ("Hillary is days away from indictment, lock her up!") arguably handed Trump the election. Republicans have already gone on record that they will be holding Hunter Biden hearings when they take control of the House, hoping to spin off an allegation they can use against Joe.

But sure, if you pretend none of that ever happened, I suppose you could say the slippery slope just now started.

took out 14 boxes of orange spray on tan and hair gel.

DEVELOPING!

- KKM

{ sipping coffee }

{ eating donut }

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Um… same judge? pic.twitter.com/8VQwm3bO5r

— Dakota (@dkbent1) August 9, 2022

---

Tell me what you think it means (former Epstein lawyer/now magistrate) signed the search warrant

---

Independent.. When is this partisan garbage going to come to an end, this is something I've never seen before, partisan politcs have reached a low on both sides, it seems worse than I've seen before. I'm not sure I will have anybody to vote for come 2024, and I'm not sure I want to vote for anybody at this point.

---

I don't give a damn about Donald Trump.

Would be just as outraged if it was the Republicans ordering a KGB raid on the homes of Carter , Clinton or Obama .

Osodecentx said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

So, now that Trump's place has been raided, do you think the FBI will have some time to go after Epstein's clients now?

---

Well, they did just raid the home of one man accused of raping a 13yr old Epstein girl...

---

Oh snap! Looky there, a picture of Trump with Epstein in a hallway not having sex with a 13 year old. Well, if that's your barometer, I can do this lame crap all day long. You're the biggest partisan idiot on this board, humckleberry. After all, you were the only idiot trying to defent dementia joe during his fubar'd Afghanistan pullout. Aren't you the dumbass that tried to suggest that the laptop didn't belong to hunter biden too?

---

Epstein provided underage sex partners to B. Clinton, therefore Trump gets to violate whatever laws he wants to.

---

Another stupid mudslinging non-factual post. Propaganda drive-by.

Osodecentx said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Um… same judge? pic.twitter.com/8VQwm3bO5r

— Dakota (@dkbent1) August 9, 2022

---

Tell me what you think it means (former Epstein lawyer/now magistrate) signed the search warrant

---

Canada2017 said:

---

OsoCoreyell said:

---

A few observations:

1) What Evidence? - Raiding the home of a former President and potential future candidate is a historic event; There had better be rock-solid probable cause, or this really is an incredibly destabilizing move.

2) Merrick Garland - There is absolutely no way in the world that this happened without Merrick Garland's approval and consent. None. Whether or not it was justified I will leave until I see the evidence that supported the warrant. For the sake of this country, it had better be absolutely, unequivocally solid.

3) Trump - Before I know what was looked for and the basis for probably cause, it is hard to know Trump's culpability. And while I can certainly argue that there is a ridiculous double-standard when it comes to Republicans being investigated, in isolation, I cannot say that this wasn't justified without seeing the evidence. Trump is certainly capably of breaking the law if he thinks it is in his interest. But whether he actually did or not, I do not yet know and, outside of the DOJ and Trump, no one does.

---

Good grief

Does anyone think Dems are going to let a little issue like lack of evidence hinder them at this point ?

They unleased a firestorm throughout the country ....and Dems no doubt planned for such a reaction .

As a result I am totally confident the KGB will find 'evidence' even if is a comic book or ( shocking ) planted by KGB agents .

Take the blinders off fellas.....we have entered a totally new chapter in US history and all pre conceived notions of our law enforcement agencies and judicial systems are dated.

This is where they draw the line, however. They would never stoop to rigging an election.

---

ABC BEAR said:

---

Canada2017 said:

---

OsoCoreyell said:

---

A few observations:

1) What Evidence? - Raiding the home of a former President and potential future candidate is a historic event; There had better be rock-solid probable cause, or this really is an incredibly destabilizing move.

2) Merrick Garland - There is absolutely no way in the world that this happened without Merrick Garland's approval and consent. None. Whether or not it was justified I will leave until I see the evidence that supported the warrant. For the sake of this country, it had better be absolutely, unequivocally solid.

3) Trump - Before I know what was looked for and the basis for probably cause, it is hard to know Trump's culpability. And while I can certainly argue that there is a ridiculous double-standard when it comes to Republicans being investigated, in isolation, I cannot say that this wasn't justified without seeing the evidence. Trump is certainly capably of breaking the law if he thinks it is in his interest. But whether he actually did or not, I do not yet know and, outside of the DOJ and Trump, no one does.

---

This is where they draw the line, however. They would never stoop to rigging an election.

---

---

Yeah.....certainly makes one willing to re examine those 81 million 'votes'.

Canada2017 said:

---

ABC BEAR said:

---

Canada2017 said:

---

OsoCoreyell said:

---

A few observations:

1) What Evidence? - Raiding the home of a former President and potential future candidate is a historic event; There had better be rock-solid probable cause, or this really is an incredibly destabilizing move.

2) Merrick Garland - There is absolutely no way in the world that this happened without Merrick Garland's approval and consent. None. Whether or not it was justified I will leave until I see the evidence that supported the warrant. For the sake of this country, it had better be absolutely, unequivocally solid.

3) Trump - Before I know what was looked for and the basis for probably cause, it is hard to know Trump's culpability. And while I can certainly argue that there is a ridiculous double-standard when it comes to Republicans being investigated, in isolation, I cannot say that this wasn't justified without seeing the evidence. Trump is certainly capably of breaking the law if he thinks it is in his interest. But whether he actually did or not, I do not yet know and, outside of the DOJ and Trump, no one does.

---

This is where they draw the line, however. They would never stoop to rigging an election.

---

---

Yeah.....certainly makes one willing to re examine those 81 million 'votes'.

---

you cant- they destroyed the evidence even though state law says you have to keep it. Under oath, they answered "nobody stopped us"

HuMcK said:

---

contrario said:

---

If the republicans weren't so spineless, these actions by the democrats would be the start of a slippery slope. The democrats know the republicans in power don't have the intestinal fortitude to take similar actions on political enemies. I'm not a fan of trump, but this is exactly why they are so scared of trump - he actually is as reckless as the democrats are when he comes to maintaining democracy and has the guts to take similar actions they would take.

---

Republicans impeached Bill for lying about a blow job, an accusation that was spun out of multiple separate years long investigations. They investigated Hillary for essentially the same thing Trump is being investigated for now, which was spun out of one of a dozen or so partisan Benghazi investigations. That investigation and the GOP weaponization of it ("Hillary is days away from indictment, lock her up!") arguably handed Trump the election. Republicans have already gone on record that they will be holding Hunter Biden hearings when they take control of the House, hoping to spin off an allegation they can use against Joe.

But sure, if you pretend none of that ever happened, I suppose you could say the slippery slope just now started.

---

There is a significant distinction between a congressional investigation and a DOJ investigation that results in search warrants being issued and homes being raided. That seems to be what you are missing. This action is unprecedented (I don't recall HRC's home being raided or search warrants being issued for destroying devices and servers with hammers, do you?). And when you combine that with the Trump collusion hoax that permeated the entire Trump administration, it does appear to smack of extreme partisanship on the part of people in the admin/DOJ who appear now willing to use the DOJ to do their bidding.

As usual, Dems seem all too willing to open up Pandora's Box on this, either unaware or uncaring regarding the precedence it sets (hello, banana republic) or the retribution that awaits, should the Republicans take control of Congress.