Sam Lowry said:

---

LOL, so now filing an appeal is "threatening the judge."

---

Threatening the judge with going to the 11th Circuit.

The DOJ is scared lol. You should be ashamed of yourself for supporting this bull****, they obviously have something to hide that's damning to them.

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

LOL, so now filing an appeal is "threatening the judge."

---

Threatening the judge with going to the 11th Circuit.

The DOJ is scared lol. You should be ashamed of yourself for supporting this bull****, they obviously have something to hide that's damning to them.

---

Yes, Trump is obviously hiding things that are very damming, and his bullsht excuses are laughable.

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

LOL, so now filing an appeal is "threatening the judge."

---

Threatening the judge with going to the 11th Circuit.

The DOJ is scared lol. You should be ashamed of yourself for supporting this bull****, they obviously have something to hide that's damning to them.

---

Yes, Trump is obviously hiding things that are very damming, and his bullsht excuses are laughable.

---

Damning against the Russiagate team.

DOJ is saying the IC assessment is urgent to national security, and a Special Master would slow that down because the same agents are working both the assessment and criminal investigation. Considering Trump had those documents for 18 mos, this is complete bull*****

You Sam and millions of others are so easily manipulated. Wake the hell up.

A public opinion manipulation method that continues to be replicated: "intel" leaks intended to look like independent corroboration of officials' claims, which are then cited as justification for official action, even though it was the officials themselves who organized the leaks https://t.co/HNGJKUUf1h

— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) September 8, 2022

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

LOL, so now filing an appeal is "threatening the judge."

---

Threatening the judge with going to the 11th Circuit.

The DOJ is scared lol. You should be ashamed of yourself for supporting this bull****, they obviously have something to hide that's damning to them.

---

This is a pretty obscure legal issue. I have no idea who's right, and I doubt many of you do either. Have you even read the motion yet?

Sam Lowry said:

---

LOL, so now filing an appeal is "threatening the judge."

---

there is a group that is already filed against Judge Cannon for ethics violations for taking the case in the first place but they wouldn't have filed it if she had ruled against Trump. They're doing the same thing that they did with the judge from Florida related to the mask mandate.

Sam Lowry said:

---

LOL, so now filing an appeal is "threatening the judge."

---

"threatening the judge with going to the 11th Circuit"

It's really interesting what happens when you complete the operative statement.

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

LOL, so now filing an appeal is "threatening the judge."

---

Threatening the judge with going to the 11th Circuit.

The DOJ is scared lol. You should be ashamed of yourself for supporting this bull****, they obviously have something to hide that's damning to them.

---

Yes, Trump is obviously hiding things that are very damming, and his bullsht excuses are laughable.

---

he is either hiding things that damn him or hiding things from others that damn them and they want them back..

Both sides of this are so bush league at this point

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

LOL, so now filing an appeal is "threatening the judge."

---

Threatening the judge with going to the 11th Circuit.

The DOJ is scared lol. You should be ashamed of yourself for supporting this bull****, they obviously have something to hide that's damning to them.

---

Yes, Trump is obviously hiding things that are very damming, and his bullsht excuses are laughable.

---

Yeah, any legal move Trump makes is a "scheme", "tactic" or "excuse". Anything DOJ or Liz does is perfectly fine and expected. You guys are pathetic.

Just because you don't like someone doesn't make them guilty. Hope you are ok if nothing comes of this after the election, which is all this election scheme is by the Dems. But, don't worry there will be more investigations in 2024.

4th and Inches said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

LOL, so now filing an appeal is "threatening the judge."

---

there is a group that is already filed against Judge Cannon for ethics violations for taking the case in the first place but they wouldn't have filed it if she had ruled against Trump. They're doing the same thing that they did with the judge from Florida related to the mask mandate.

---

Okay.

I guess overdue library books are more important than exposing classified documents with foreign actors and lying about it.

I watched Regime media for the first time in a while ... they had a"special report" interviewing Mensa President and US VP Kamala Brown discussing her uniquely intelligent take on the dangers of overdue library books. Yeah - I'm no way is this a coordinated political stunt.

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Oh? It's always projection with Trump.

Geoffrey S. Berman, who headed the Manhattan office, says in a book the Justice Department pushed cases, against John Kerry and others, to help Mr. Trump. https://t.co/os8Wk1KrNf

— Ben Pershing (@benpershing) September 8, 2022

---

ahem....were any of them even investigated, much less prosecuted?

---

Sec. Kerry was. The investigation did not produce enough evidence to charge him with a violation of the Logan Act. Do you have evidence he did?

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

LOL, so now filing an appeal is "threatening the judge."

---

Threatening the judge with going to the 11th Circuit.

The DOJ is scared lol. You should be ashamed of yourself for supporting this bull****, they obviously have something to hide that's damning to them.

---

Every time Venus rises you see a flying saucer.

Nothing, not a single thing (unless you have something you haven't cited?) points to any docs from MAL that are damning of the DOJ.

This is part of an investigation, let it play out before you claim "IT'S ALIENS!!"

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

LOL, so now filing an appeal is "threatening the judge."

---

Threatening the judge with going to the 11th Circuit.

The DOJ is scared lol. You should be ashamed of yourself for supporting this bull****, they obviously have something to hide that's damning to them.

---

Every time Venus rises you see a flying saucer.

Nothing, not a single thing (unless you have something you haven't cited?) points to any docs from MAL that are damning of the DOJ.

This is part of an investigation, let it play out before you claim "IT'S ALIENS!!"

---

I can't trust the FBI.

Team Trump hinted that it was related to Russiagate.

The same FBI/DOJ caught Steele's primary subsource Igor Danchenko in a number of lies. Just yesterday we learned they signed Danchenko up as a paid FBI confidential human source. By doing so, the FBI prevented discovery of its own misconduct. Utterly corrupt and self-serving.

quash said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Oh? It's always projection with Trump.

Geoffrey S. Berman, who headed the Manhattan office, says in a book the Justice Department pushed cases, against John Kerry and others, to help Mr. Trump. https://t.co/os8Wk1KrNf

— Ben Pershing (@benpershing) September 8, 2022

---

ahem....were any of them even investigated, much less prosecuted?

---

Sec. Kerry was. The investigation did not produce enough evidence to charge him with a violation of the Logan Act. Do you have evidence he did?

---

Just what was reported in the press, which seems to be a pretty clearly a violation of the Logan Act.

quash said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Oh? It's always projection with Trump.

Geoffrey S. Berman, who headed the Manhattan office, says in a book the Justice Department pushed cases, against John Kerry and others, to help Mr. Trump. https://t.co/os8Wk1KrNf

— Ben Pershing (@benpershing) September 8, 2022

---

ahem....were any of them even investigated, much less prosecuted?

---

Sec. Kerry was. The investigation did not produce enough evidence to charge him with a violation of the Logan Act. Do you have evidence he did?

---

Are you talking about him violating the Logan act by privately negotiating and providing aid/advice to the Iranians in 2018 or the Vietnamese during the Vietnam war? Can you clarify which time?

Golem said:

---

quash said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Oh? It's always projection with Trump.

Geoffrey S. Berman, who headed the Manhattan office, says in a book the Justice Department pushed cases, against John Kerry and others, to help Mr. Trump. https://t.co/os8Wk1KrNf

— Ben Pershing (@benpershing) September 8, 2022

---

ahem....were any of them even investigated, much less prosecuted?

---

Sec. Kerry was. The investigation did not produce enough evidence to charge him with a violation of the Logan Act. Do you have evidence he did?

---

Are you talking about him violating the Logan act by privately negotiating and providing aid/advice to the Iranians in 2018 or the Vietnamese during the Vietnam war? Can you clarify which time?

---

Dissent is not treason. Really.

quash said:

---

Golem said:

---

quash said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Oh? It's always projection with Trump.

Geoffrey S. Berman, who headed the Manhattan office, says in a book the Justice Department pushed cases, against John Kerry and others, to help Mr. Trump. https://t.co/os8Wk1KrNf

— Ben Pershing (@benpershing) September 8, 2022

---

ahem....were any of them even investigated, much less prosecuted?

---

Sec. Kerry was. The investigation did not produce enough evidence to charge him with a violation of the Logan Act. Do you have evidence he did?

---

Are you talking about him violating the Logan act by privately negotiating and providing aid/advice to the Iranians in 2018 or the Vietnamese during the Vietnam war? Can you clarify which time?

---

Dissent is not treason. Really.

---

Which violation of the Logan act are you talking about, though? He's sided with America's enemies more than once. Just looking for clarification.

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

LOL, so now filing an appeal is "threatening the judge."

---

Threatening the judge with going to the 11th Circuit.

The DOJ is scared lol. You should be ashamed of yourself for supporting this bull****, they obviously have something to hide that's damning to them.

---

Every time Venus rises you see a flying saucer.

Nothing, not a single thing (unless you have something you haven't cited?) points to any docs from MAL that are damning of the DOJ.

This is part of an investigation, let it play out before you claim "IT'S ALIENS!!"

---

I can't trust the FBI.

Team Trump hinted that it was related to Russiagate.

The same FBI/DOJ caught Steele's primary subsource Igor Danchenko in a number of lies. Just yesterday we learned they signed Danchenko up as a paid FBI confidential human source. By doing so, the FBI prevented discovery of its own misconduct. Utterly corrupt and self-serving.

---

I posted previously there is a reasonable theory that the library book raid was cover for the FBI to get some potentially damning documents from Trump about the Russia Hoax. Seems more plausible than nuclear codes or whatever other stupid speculation the regime media engages in.

quash: "Dissent is not treason. Really."

This from a guy who wants anyone who questions the 2020 Election results to be punished as harshly as possible.

quash said:

---

Golem said:

---

quash said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Oh? It's always projection with Trump.

Geoffrey S. Berman, who headed the Manhattan office, says in a book the Justice Department pushed cases, against John Kerry and others, to help Mr. Trump. https://t.co/os8Wk1KrNf

— Ben Pershing (@benpershing) September 8, 2022

---

ahem....were any of them even investigated, much less prosecuted?

---

Sec. Kerry was. The investigation did not produce enough evidence to charge him with a violation of the Logan Act. Do you have evidence he did?

---

Are you talking about him violating the Logan act by privately negotiating and providing aid/advice to the Iranians in 2018 or the Vietnamese during the Vietnam war? Can you clarify which time?

---

Dissent is not treason. Really.

---

Really? You feeling ok? You have been quite vocal on the Jan 6th and anyone in general that feels that the 2020 election was a little out of the ordinary.

I guess it depends on who it is with you.

Judge Cannon has denied DOJ's motion for a partial stay and has appointed Raymond DEARIE as special master.

Trump has to pay special master fees.

4th and Inches said:

---

Judge Cannon has denied DOJ's motion for a partial stay and has appointed Raymond DEARIE as special master.

Trump has to pay special master fees.

---

Judge can just forward that bill on to the RNC...

RMF5630 said:

---

quash said:

---

Golem said:

---

quash said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Oh? It's always projection with Trump.

Geoffrey S. Berman, who headed the Manhattan office, says in a book the Justice Department pushed cases, against John Kerry and others, to help Mr. Trump. https://t.co/os8Wk1KrNf

— Ben Pershing (@benpershing) September 8, 2022

---

ahem....were any of them even investigated, much less prosecuted?

---

Sec. Kerry was. The investigation did not produce enough evidence to charge him with a violation of the Logan Act. Do you have evidence he did?

---

Are you talking about him violating the Logan act by privately negotiating and providing aid/advice to the Iranians in 2018 or the Vietnamese during the Vietnam war? Can you clarify which time?

---

Dissent is not treason. Really.

---

Really? You feeling ok? You have been quite vocal on the Jan 6th and anyone in general that feels that the 2020 election was a little out of the ordinary.

I guess it depends on who it is with you.

---

Doing fine.

Am I vocal about calling into question a legit election? Sure.

And I don't concern myself with people who think some things were a little out of the ordinary except, usually, to agree in regard to specific instances that also, usually, had no effect on the outcome.

So, do you think all the veterans who returned from Vietnam and protested the war were violating the Logan Act?

quash said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

quash said:

---

Golem said:

---

quash said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Oh? It's always projection with Trump.

Geoffrey S. Berman, who headed the Manhattan office, says in a book the Justice Department pushed cases, against John Kerry and others, to help Mr. Trump. https://t.co/os8Wk1KrNf

— Ben Pershing (@benpershing) September 8, 2022

---

ahem....were any of them even investigated, much less prosecuted?

---

Sec. Kerry was. The investigation did not produce enough evidence to charge him with a violation of the Logan Act. Do you have evidence he did?

---

Are you talking about him violating the Logan act by privately negotiating and providing aid/advice to the Iranians in 2018 or the Vietnamese during the Vietnam war? Can you clarify which time?

---

Dissent is not treason. Really.

---

Really? You feeling ok? You have been quite vocal on the Jan 6th and anyone in general that feels that the 2020 election was a little out of the ordinary.

I guess it depends on who it is with you.

---

Doing fine.

Am I vocal about calling into question a legit election? Sure.

And I don't concern myself with people who think some things were a little out of the ordinary except, usually, to agree in regard to specific instances that also, usually, had no effect on the outcome.

So, do you think all the veterans who returned from Vietnam and protested the war were violating the Logan Act?

---

No, I wasn't the one making the argument that Jan 6th id treason

quash said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

quash said:

---

Golem said:

---

quash said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Oh? It's always projection with Trump.

Geoffrey S. Berman, who headed the Manhattan office, says in a book the Justice Department pushed cases, against John Kerry and others, to help Mr. Trump. https://t.co/os8Wk1KrNf

— Ben Pershing (@benpershing) September 8, 2022

---

ahem....were any of them even investigated, much less prosecuted?

---

Sec. Kerry was. The investigation did not produce enough evidence to charge him with a violation of the Logan Act. Do you have evidence he did?

---

Are you talking about him violating the Logan act by privately negotiating and providing aid/advice to the Iranians in 2018 or the Vietnamese during the Vietnam war? Can you clarify which time?

---

Dissent is not treason. Really.

---

Really? You feeling ok? You have been quite vocal on the Jan 6th and anyone in general that feels that the 2020 election was a little out of the ordinary.

I guess it depends on who it is with you.

---

Doing fine.

Am I vocal about calling into question a legit election? Sure.

And I don't concern myself with people who think some things were a little out of the ordinary except, usually, to agree in regard to specific instances that also, usually, had no effect on the outcome.

So, do you think all the veterans who returned from Vietnam and protested the war were violating the Logan Act?

---

How about the people who met in Paris with Madame Nguyen Thi Binh, then-foreign minister of the Provisional Revolutionary Government. (Viet cong)?

Golem said:

---

quash said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

quash said:

---

Golem said:

---

quash said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Oh? It's always projection with Trump.

Geoffrey S. Berman, who headed the Manhattan office, says in a book the Justice Department pushed cases, against John Kerry and others, to help Mr. Trump. https://t.co/os8Wk1KrNf

— Ben Pershing (@benpershing) September 8, 2022

---

ahem....were any of them even investigated, much less prosecuted?

---

Sec. Kerry was. The investigation did not produce enough evidence to charge him with a violation of the Logan Act. Do you have evidence he did?

---

Are you talking about him violating the Logan act by privately negotiating and providing aid/advice to the Iranians in 2018 or the Vietnamese during the Vietnam war? Can you clarify which time?

---

Dissent is not treason. Really.

---

Really? You feeling ok? You have been quite vocal on the Jan 6th and anyone in general that feels that the 2020 election was a little out of the ordinary.

I guess it depends on who it is with you.

---

Doing fine.

Am I vocal about calling into question a legit election? Sure.

And I don't concern myself with people who think some things were a little out of the ordinary except, usually, to agree in regard to specific instances that also, usually, had no effect on the outcome.

So, do you think all the veterans who returned from Vietnam and protested the war were violating the Logan Act?

---

How about the people who met in Paris with Madame Nguyen Thi Binh, then-foreign minister of the Provisional Revolutionary Government. (Viet cong)?

---

He missed the point of my comment (poor punctuation, my fault).

What matters to Quash is that it is Trump. Trump could speak the Pope Francis and it is treason. It doesn't matter, it is Trump or one of his associates, it is treason...

Have the returned library books restored democracy yet?

quash said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

quash said:

---

Golem said:

---

quash said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Oh? It's always projection with Trump.

Geoffrey S. Berman, who headed the Manhattan office, says in a book the Justice Department pushed cases, against John Kerry and others, to help Mr. Trump. https://t.co/os8Wk1KrNf

— Ben Pershing (@benpershing) September 8, 2022

---

ahem....were any of them even investigated, much less prosecuted?

---

Sec. Kerry was. The investigation did not produce enough evidence to charge him with a violation of the Logan Act. Do you have evidence he did?

---

Are you talking about him violating the Logan act by privately negotiating and providing aid/advice to the Iranians in 2018 or the Vietnamese during the Vietnam war? Can you clarify which time?

---

Dissent is not treason. Really.

---

Really? You feeling ok? You have been quite vocal on the Jan 6th and anyone in general that feels that the 2020 election was a little out of the ordinary.

I guess it depends on who it is with you.

---

Doing fine.

Am I vocal about calling into question a legit election? Sure.

And I don't concern myself with people who think some things were a little out of the ordinary except, usually, to agree in regard to specific instances that also, usually, had no effect on the outcome.

So, do you think all the veterans who returned from Vietnam and protested the war were violating the Logan Act?

---

oh stop it with the straw man.

The Logan Act isn't about dissent. It's about private negotiations with foreign powers involved in disputes with the USG. And what Kerry did; he is a member of a party not holding the White House and he engaged in policy discussions with a foreign power involved in treaty negotiations with the USG. Literally, press reports indicated that Kerry advised foreign powers to ignore Trump and wait for Dems to regain control of the WH. And lo & behold, now that the Dems have returned to power, Kerry is a high level foreign policy official in the WH.

Kerry's entreaty to the Iranians was a classic, textbook scenario the LA attempted to outlaw. A member of opposing party, a former presidential nominee with official foreign policy porfolio, engaging in partisan diplomacy during a policy interregnum. No question he shoulda been investigated. It's like looking at a kid with blueberries all over his face holding a half eaten pie, with neighbors positing videos of the violation all over social media, and deciding "oh well.....no harm, no foul."

And while we're at it: apply the same kind of lenient, "boys will be boys / politics is politics" prosecutorial discretion to J6 that we applied to Kerry vs the Logan act. We don't even have a J6 commission.

Just another example in the dual system of justice.

RMF5630 said:

---

Golem said:

---

quash said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

quash said:

---

Golem said:

---

quash said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Oh? It's always projection with Trump.

Geoffrey S. Berman, who headed the Manhattan office, says in a book the Justice Department pushed cases, against John Kerry and others, to help Mr. Trump. https://t.co/os8Wk1KrNf

— Ben Pershing (@benpershing) September 8, 2022

---

ahem....were any of them even investigated, much less prosecuted?

---

Sec. Kerry was. The investigation did not produce enough evidence to charge him with a violation of the Logan Act. Do you have evidence he did?

---

Are you talking about him violating the Logan act by privately negotiating and providing aid/advice to the Iranians in 2018 or the Vietnamese during the Vietnam war? Can you clarify which time?

---

Dissent is not treason. Really.

---

Really? You feeling ok? You have been quite vocal on the Jan 6th and anyone in general that feels that the 2020 election was a little out of the ordinary.

I guess it depends on who it is with you.

---

Doing fine.

Am I vocal about calling into question a legit election? Sure.

And I don't concern myself with people who think some things were a little out of the ordinary except, usually, to agree in regard to specific instances that also, usually, had no effect on the outcome.

So, do you think all the veterans who returned from Vietnam and protested the war were violating the Logan Act?

---

How about the people who met in Paris with Madame Nguyen Thi Binh, then-foreign minister of the Provisional Revolutionary Government. (Viet cong)?

---

He missed the point of my comment (poor punctuation, my fault).

What matters to Quash is that it is Trump. Trump could speak the Pope Francis and it is treason. It doesn't matter, it is Trump or one of his associates, it is treason...

---

Bull*****

I didn't miss your point, I wanted to see if you supported Golem's position.

I have been vocal about Jan 6th. That doesn't mean I think everything Trump did or does is treason, not by a long shot. I thought you had a little more integrity but apparently you just want to virtue signal to the MAGA boys. Not that there's anything wrong with that...

quash said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

Golem said:

---

quash said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

quash said:

---

Golem said:

---

quash said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Oh? It's always projection with Trump.

Geoffrey S. Berman, who headed the Manhattan office, says in a book the Justice Department pushed cases, against John Kerry and others, to help Mr. Trump. https://t.co/os8Wk1KrNf

— Ben Pershing (@benpershing) September 8, 2022

---

ahem....were any of them even investigated, much less prosecuted?

---

Sec. Kerry was. The investigation did not produce enough evidence to charge him with a violation of the Logan Act. Do you have evidence he did?

---

Are you talking about him violating the Logan act by privately negotiating and providing aid/advice to the Iranians in 2018 or the Vietnamese during the Vietnam war? Can you clarify which time?

---

Dissent is not treason. Really.

---

Really? You feeling ok? You have been quite vocal on the Jan 6th and anyone in general that feels that the 2020 election was a little out of the ordinary.

I guess it depends on who it is with you.

---

Doing fine.

Am I vocal about calling into question a legit election? Sure.

And I don't concern myself with people who think some things were a little out of the ordinary except, usually, to agree in regard to specific instances that also, usually, had no effect on the outcome.

So, do you think all the veterans who returned from Vietnam and protested the war were violating the Logan Act?

---

How about the people who met in Paris with Madame Nguyen Thi Binh, then-foreign minister of the Provisional Revolutionary Government. (Viet cong)?

---

He missed the point of my comment (poor punctuation, my fault).

What matters to Quash is that it is Trump. Trump could speak the Pope Francis and it is treason. It doesn't matter, it is Trump or one of his associates, it is treason...

---

Bull*****

I didn't miss your point, I wanted to see if you supported Golem's position.

I have been vocal about Jan 6th. That doesn't mean I think everything Trump did or does is treason, not by a long shot. I thought you had a little more integrity but apparently you just want to virtue signal to the MAGA boys. Not that there's anything wrong with that...

---

So you have no issue democrats negotiating privately/providing negotiating guidance to enemies of the USA like the Viet Cong or Iran. OK. Thanks for admitting it.

Yeah - I trust the leakers behind and armed raid for overdue library books.

https://news.yahoo.com/main-steele-dossier-source-fbi-121024011.html

Igor Danchenko, a primary contributor to the Steele dossier, was hired by the FBI as a confidential informant in 2017, Special Counsel John Durham revealed in a new court filing.

The Russian national was ultimately charged in 2021 as part of Durham's probe of the Trump-Russia investigation; he is accused of lying to the FBI regarding his sources for some claims in the Steele dossier. The charges focus on statements Danchenko made related to the sources he used in providing information to an investigative firm in the United Kingdom.

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Yeah - I trust the leakers behind and armed raid for overdue library books.

https://news.yahoo.com/main-steele-dossier-source-fbi-121024011.html

Igor Danchenko, a primary contributor to the Steele dossier, was hired by the FBI as a confidential informant in 2017, Special Counsel John Durham revealed in a new court filing.

The Russian national was ultimately charged in 2021 as part of Durham's probe of the Trump-Russia investigation; he is accused of lying to the FBI regarding his sources for some claims in the Steele dossier. The charges focus on statements Danchenko made related to the sources he used in providing information to an investigative firm in the United Kingdom.

---

Hiring Danchenko as a paid source protects him from public inquiry. Protection of sources & methods. Yeah, prosecutors and congressional investigators can get to him, but have to jump lots of hurdles that take lots of time and end up with lots & lots of redactions of anything revealed to the public.

whiterock said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Yeah - I trust the leakers behind and armed raid for overdue library books.

https://news.yahoo.com/main-steele-dossier-source-fbi-121024011.html

Igor Danchenko, a primary contributor to the Steele dossier, was hired by the FBI as a confidential informant in 2017, Special Counsel John Durham revealed in a new court filing.

The Russian national was ultimately charged in 2021 as part of Durham's probe of the Trump-Russia investigation; he is accused of lying to the FBI regarding his sources for some claims in the Steele dossier. The charges focus on statements Danchenko made related to the sources he used in providing information to an investigative firm in the United Kingdom.

---

Hiring Danchenko as a paid source protects him from public inquiry. Protection of sources & methods. Yeah, prosecutors and congressional investigators can get to him, but have to jump lots of hurdles that take lots of time and end up with lots & lots of redactions of anything revealed to the public.

---

Our republic can't withstand this level of corruption:

The FBI is totally and irredeemably corrupt.

They did this *after* Danchenko had disavowed the dossier by admitting it was just bar talk and gossip. Danchenko had *zero* value as a CHS.

The *only* reason they made him a CHS was to CONCEAL THEIR OWN MALFEASANCE.

Shut it down. https://t.co/vpuOFHUjAa

— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) September 13, 2022

This twitter account put many of these pieces together years ago: https://twitter.com/walkafyre