That was the plan from the beginning. Flood the country with illegals and then sit back and watch the courts take decades to handle all those cases. Meanwhile the great replacement happens thanks to anchor babies and all those spawned by the people who didn't bother to show up for their hearings. Sam and his ilk think the rest of the country is too stupid to catch on so he clings to his technicalities and sticks his head up his ass when it comes to the grim meat hook reality of what democrats have wrought.Doc Holliday said:With the excessive legal rights you want to provide them, the speed of managing that process is too slow and will effectively result in extremely minimal progress thus resulting in catastrophe.Sam Lowry said:So will giving up on the rule of law. If only there were a way to deport people legally...Doc Holliday said:What if I told you that if we don't control our borders now and don't get a handle on the millions of illegals within the country, it will be catastrophic in the long term?Sam Lowry said:What if I told you…we can control our borders and also have a democracy?gtownbear said:My mind is fine. We have a country when the illegals are sent packing. If they are allowed to stay I am not so sure. I have no poison anywhere. Thanks for the concern though.Sam Lowry said:I understood your point. My point is that you're being lied to.gtownbear said:That is a ridiculous statement and you know it. You pull one small phrase out of a long paragraph as if that was the entire meaning of my comment. What a cheap trick. You well know that my point was that if activist judges continue to make rulings and injunctions that the public realizes are not based in law but rather just to stop President Trump politically, the public's faith in the justice system could be harmed to a degree which would bring about lawlessness due to the lack of belief in decisions produced by the judiciary.Sam Lowry said:Biden complied with the Supreme Court's ruling.gtownbear said:Yep Sam just like Joe Biden did not when he forgave the student loans when the Supreme Court said that would take a law passed by congress. You folks twist the law like a pretzel to make it come out the way you want. Next week you will take the opposite position if it suits your narrative and without shame.Sam Lowry said:The judge is not ignoring the Supreme Court. The people writing these articles are the ones trying to break down the political order and belief in the judicial system.gtownbear said:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/05/obama-judge-says-hell-supreme-court-orders-trump/
President Trump follows the rulings from the Supreme Court. Now we have another Obama appointed judge thumbing his nose at a Supreme Court ruling he doesn't agree with and demands President Trump furnish more information to him. To Judge Chen I say tar, feathers, rail; sometimes the old ways of removal are still the best ways! lol.
Some of these district court judges elevate themselves to a power status never seen before in American judicial history. How could they not be for the illegals. Looks like most of them just washed up on our shores themselves and somehow got nominated to the Bench. Wow. Just wow. Are we in trouble or what? Think of it. These activist judges simply ignore the rulings and laws they dislike, even from the U.S. Supreme Court. If the Supreme Court does not stop these maniacs, we will soon have a complete breakdown in societal control. No one will believe in the judicial system due to its corrupt nature. Then it will be every individual for himself or herself.
The Supreme Court said Trump acted properly in overturning Biden's actions on the more than 300,000 Venezuelans and could deport them and this judge said before Trump did that he required him to provide certain information to his court. Sure looks like disobeying the Supreme Court to me.
You've been exposing yourself to some frighteningly bad legal commentary in recent days. "Every man for himself" is precisely what these people want...in the hope they can take advantage of it, naturally.
As an example, I would bring up the backlash in public opinion over the lawfare by let's say overzealous Attorney Generals, District Attorneys and Prosecutors who brought lawsuit after lawsuit against President Trump as a political strategy. When the public realized the cases had no merit, and were simply to stop Trump politically, they got behind Trump and his poll numbers went up instead of down. The public was smarter than the idealogues thought.
The judge explained his action very simply: "The Supreme Court's decision stayed the Court's postponement order but did not stay litigation on the merits."
Stop listening to people who deliberately poison your mind.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?