We were talking about homosexuality. Sexual is in the word itself. You changed the subject to phileo (friendship, or brotherly love). Non sexual. Two totally different things. Saying that the love between friends can be deeper than that of a sexual relationship kind of goes without saying. It also says nothing about the Bible's prohibition against homosexual behavior.cinque said:How did I change the subject?bearassnekkid said:cinque said:The one in Scripture that details the depth of one man's love for his friend who died: "Your love for me was wonderful, more wonderful than that of a women"bearassnekkid said:What sexual relationship are you referring to?cinque said:How can you call it sin if the only same gender loving reference of deep abiding love in Scripture is a positive one?bearassnekkid said:Why do you feel the need to add to it? Saying that the Bible is silent as to certain scenarios attached to sin and therefore those scenarios could be deemed not sinful . . . is nebulous at best and nefarious at worst. Do you do the same thing with other sins? The Bible doesn't say anything about "deeply abiding love" with a mistress that "transcends what could be experienced with your wife" either. Does that mean adultery is ok if it includes that qualifier? Of course not.cinque said:It describes "dishonorable passions" and "shameless acts." Does it say anything about deeply abiding love that transcends what could be experienced with a woman?YoakDaddy said:cinque said:Again, how should same gender loving men live when the Bible is silent on same gender loving consent, and mutuality, and since it is possible for their love to transcend that of what they could feel for a woman?bearassnekkid said:You tried to deflect by chastising me for using lust as an example and you jump to in vitro fertilization? You trying to set a world record for disingenuousness or something?cinque said:
The Even if the Bible is good for teaching, correction, etc., it does not address every situation known to the human condition. What does it teach on in vitro fertilization? Does it speak to that issue? Because it doesn't does that make the concern or question a false premise? Can a couple discern the will of God without the specific biblical teaching?
Also, you just proved my point with this post (accidentally I'm sure). But I'm not interested in pointing out your logic flaws, I'm here to answer your questions that you said hadn't been answered. What are they?
It's not silent. Romans 1:24-32 describes the sinful behavior.
To answer your specific question, the answer is "They should live in accordance with what the Bible is NOT silent on." Namely, they should not act on their sinful proclivities (in this case homosexual desires) just like the rest of us shouldn't act on ours. You claiming that "their love could transcend that of what they could feel for a woman" is completely irrelevant. Transcendental feelings aren't what Godly commands are made of. One could use the whole "but but but I feel strongly a certain way" to justify virtually every sin listed in the Bible. In fact, Satan uses that all the time to lead people into sinful choices.
All that said, I don't pretend that this particular sinful proclivity is an easy one to overcome. I have two close friends (one of whom is an occasional participant on this site) who do so, and I can say I am prouder of them than I am of any other friend who overcomes sin in their lives. It is a difficult, and often lonely, road to walk. I have great compassion and admiration for people who walk in faith regarding this subject.
One wonders what point the bereaved man was trying to make when he intentionally sought to distinguish the love he felt from for his friend from that usually shared between friends. He compared it to something deeper that is typically experienced between a man and a woman.
How should same gender loving Christians understand this particular pericope?
Ohhhhhhh. I thought we were talking about homosexuality. I didn't realize you had completely changed the subject without telling anyone.