NOT F****** GUILITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Malbec said:
There's still some America in America. Godspeed Kyle.
redfish961 said:I don't believe any of them are "heroes".Osodecentx said:Do you believe Rittenhouse is a hero?GrowlTowel said:Osodecentx said:But in the opinion of the 3 Georgia defendants, they were defending the community from a criminal and therefore justified. There had been several robberies in the neighborhood. At the time of the killing, a citizens arrest was legal in Georgia.Wangchung said:No. They ceased being any type of hero when they tried to unlawfully detain someone without any proof of a crime being committed. They are murderers.Osodecentx said:Of course not.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:The 3 men who killed Arbery claim to be protecting the community, the same claim you make for Rittenhouse.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:I don't blame youWangchung said:No.Osodecentx said:Do you think the 3 guys who killed Ahmaud Arbery are heroes who were fighting anarchy?Wangchung said:
Disagree on C. When politicians hold back police and allow riots to continue it is up to citizens to step in and stop the violence. Citizens are literally the last line of defense against anarchy.
The man killed by the Georgia defendants wasn't marching for racial justice.
You claim "hero status" for Rittenhouse, yet are silent about the Georgia "heroes"
Do you think the Georgia defendants are heroes, the claim you make for Rittenhouse? If not, please distinguish the 2 cases
You've said that Rittenhouse was defending the community, the same claim made by the Georgia defendants.
Dude, enough already. We get it.
Do you even remember what you were like before placing your testicles in your wife's purse?
I do believe Rittenhouse is innocent via self defense.
I do believe the 3 Georgians are guilty of murder because this was not self defense.
In Rittenhouse's case he was being attacked himself. The Georgians attacked Arbery.
For now...Canon said:
Self defense against violent rioters is still protected, thank God!
Jack Bauer said:
The goons will be out in Kenosha and other places this weekend for their own justice.
Doc Holliday said:
Thank god and poor kid. He defends himself and the entire scumbag left and corporate media tries to end his life.
He should have never been charged to begin with.
Unfortunately cities will burn.
I hope he does because that will teach some of these entities a lesson.Canon said:Doc Holliday said:
Thank god and poor kid. He defends himself and the entire scumbag left and corporate media tries to end his life.
He should have never been charged to begin with.
Unfortunately cities will burn.
He will be a rich man soon enough. SOOOOO many media outlets to sue, so little time.
Time to crack some heads. Any violence whatsoever, the rat people should be crushed and put down. Americans are tired of this s**t!!!!Jack Bauer said:
The goons will be out in Kenosha and other places this weekend for their own justice.
You serious Clark? OJ trial?nein51 said:
Right verdict just like OJ. You don't have to like the verdict for it to be correct.
Not even remotely comparable. There was DNA evidence of Goldman and his ex-wife in OJ's car for goodness sake.nein51 said:
Right verdict just like OJ. You don't have to like the verdict for it to be correct.
This is exactly me, but I'm "off the rails".redfish961 said:I don't believe any of them are "heroes".Osodecentx said:Do you believe Rittenhouse is a hero?GrowlTowel said:Osodecentx said:But in the opinion of the 3 Georgia defendants, they were defending the community from a criminal and therefore justified. There had been several robberies in the neighborhood. At the time of the killing, a citizens arrest was legal in Georgia.Wangchung said:No. They ceased being any type of hero when they tried to unlawfully detain someone without any proof of a crime being committed. They are murderers.Osodecentx said:Of course not.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:The 3 men who killed Arbery claim to be protecting the community, the same claim you make for Rittenhouse.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:I don't blame youWangchung said:No.Osodecentx said:Do you think the 3 guys who killed Ahmaud Arbery are heroes who were fighting anarchy?Wangchung said:
Disagree on C. When politicians hold back police and allow riots to continue it is up to citizens to step in and stop the violence. Citizens are literally the last line of defense against anarchy.
The man killed by the Georgia defendants wasn't marching for racial justice.
You claim "hero status" for Rittenhouse, yet are silent about the Georgia "heroes"
Do you think the Georgia defendants are heroes, the claim you make for Rittenhouse? If not, please distinguish the 2 cases
You've said that Rittenhouse was defending the community, the same claim made by the Georgia defendants.
Dude, enough already. We get it.
Do you even remember what you were like before placing your testicles in your wife's purse?
I do believe Rittenhouse is innocent via self defense.
I do believe the 3 Georgians are guilty of murder because this was not self defense.
In Rittenhouse's case he was being attacked himself. The Georgians attacked Arbery.
Self defense against anyone needs to be protected. Now let's see if the idiots in the Whitehouse stoke the fires with other narrative distractions.Canon said:
Self defense against violent rioters is still protected, thank God!
Wangchung said:
MSNBC acting like it's a funeral right now. Airing attacker's family's comments crying about not getting justice. Guess they're too dumb to realize their dead domestic abuser son WAS justice.
In the Rittenhouse case, the 13th juror was the judge.
— Joy-Ann (Pro-Democracy) Reid 😷 (@JoyAnnReid) November 19, 2021
I'm shocked that Rittenhouse didn't get convicted after this hard-hitting and persuasive argument from the prosecutor https://t.co/EFl9W0DF2o
— Jordan Chamberlain (@jordylancaster) November 19, 2021
He can't sue Biden while he is in office, I expect. He can sue his PAC that ran the ads against him. He can certainly sue Scarborough into oblivion for claiming he was an active shooter and unloading 60 rounds. The people who called him a white supremacist should be ripe targets for financial ruin as well. I think the Young Turks is going to have quite the dent in their wallets.Jack Bauer said:
Guesses on who he sues first...
Joe Scarborough
Joe Biden
Nicole Wallace
MSNBC as a whole?
Amal Shuq-Up said:I am disputing your analogy. It is a pitiful analogy. Arbrey was running from a group of violent men. Rittenhouse was running from a group of violent men. Arbrey was forced to defend himself from three aggressors. Rittenhouse was forced to defend himself from three aggressors.Osodecentx said:An analogy nobody is disputingAmal Shuq-Up said:Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:The 3 men who killed Arbery claim to be protecting the community, the same claim you make for Rittenhouse.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:I don't blame youWangchung said:No.Osodecentx said:Do you think the 3 guys who killed Ahmaud Arbery are heroes who were fighting anarchy?Wangchung said:
Disagree on C. When politicians hold back police and allow riots to continue it is up to citizens to step in and stop the violence. Citizens are literally the last line of defense against anarchy.
The man killed by the Georgia defendants wasn't marching for racial justice.
You claim "hero status" for Rittenhouse, yet are silent about the Georgia "heroes"
He doesn't think anything. He is a random word generator as demonstrated by his pitiful attempt to formulate an analogy.
Rittenhouse is alive today because he had a weapon to defend himself. Arbrey is not alive because he had no weapon to defend himself against his assailants.
Rittenhouse is Arbrey with a gun in your analogy. Go back to school.
Mothra said:Not even remotely comparable. There was DNA evidence of Goldman and his ex-wife in OJ's car for goodness sake.nein51 said:
Right verdict just like OJ. You don't have to like the verdict for it to be correct.
Guy should have been convicted.
Canon said:He can't sue Biden while he is in office, I expect. He can sue his PAC that ran the ads against him. He can certainly sue Scarborough into oblivion for claiming he was an active shooter and unloading 60 rounds. The people who called him a white supremacist should be ripe targets for financial ruin as well. I think the Young Turks is going to have quite the dent in their wallets.Jack Bauer said:
Guesses on who he sues first...
Joe Scarborough
Joe Biden
Nicole Wallace
MSNBC as a whole?
SUPERCUT!
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) November 9, 2021
Media: Why do reporting when we already know Rittenhouse is a terrorist? pic.twitter.com/abebdPyiIs
nein51 said:Mothra said:Not even remotely comparable. There was DNA evidence of Goldman and his ex-wife in OJ's car for goodness sake.nein51 said:
Right verdict just like OJ. You don't have to like the verdict for it to be correct.
Guy should have been convicted.
Yet the prosecution did not make that case in a way that Convinced 12 jurors. Literally the point I was making. You can think he is guilty but the prosecutor couldn't convince a jury of that. That is the system at work, imo.
Joe Biden should be #1 on the list as well as his spokesperson.Jack Bauer said:
Guesses on who he sues first...
Joe Scarborough
Joe Biden
Nicole Wallace
MSNBC as a whole?
He thought wrong.Porteroso said:Amal Shuq-Up said:I am disputing your analogy. It is a pitiful analogy. Arbrey was running from a group of violent men. Rittenhouse was running from a group of violent men. Arbrey was forced to defend himself from three aggressors. Rittenhouse was forced to defend himself from three aggressors.Osodecentx said:An analogy nobody is disputingAmal Shuq-Up said:Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:The 3 men who killed Arbery claim to be protecting the community, the same claim you make for Rittenhouse.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:I don't blame youWangchung said:No.Osodecentx said:Do you think the 3 guys who killed Ahmaud Arbery are heroes who were fighting anarchy?Wangchung said:
Disagree on C. When politicians hold back police and allow riots to continue it is up to citizens to step in and stop the violence. Citizens are literally the last line of defense against anarchy.
The man killed by the Georgia defendants wasn't marching for racial justice.
You claim "hero status" for Rittenhouse, yet are silent about the Georgia "heroes"
He doesn't think anything. He is a random word generator as demonstrated by his pitiful attempt to formulate an analogy.
Rittenhouse is alive today because he had a weapon to defend himself. Arbrey is not alive because he had no weapon to defend himself against his assailants.
Rittenhouse is Arbrey with a gun in your analogy. Go back to school.
At least one of the guys attacking Rittenhouse thought he had just murdered somebody.
I would argue that the rioters are the ones that put lives in danger. Those rioters are idiots, especially the dead ones.Porteroso said:Amal Shuq-Up said:I am disputing your analogy. It is a pitiful analogy. Arbrey was running from a group of violent men. Rittenhouse was running from a group of violent men. Arbrey was forced to defend himself from three aggressors. Rittenhouse was forced to defend himself from three aggressors.Osodecentx said:An analogy nobody is disputingAmal Shuq-Up said:Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:The 3 men who killed Arbery claim to be protecting the community, the same claim you make for Rittenhouse.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:I don't blame youWangchung said:No.Osodecentx said:Do you think the 3 guys who killed Ahmaud Arbery are heroes who were fighting anarchy?Wangchung said:
Disagree on C. When politicians hold back police and allow riots to continue it is up to citizens to step in and stop the violence. Citizens are literally the last line of defense against anarchy.
The man killed by the Georgia defendants wasn't marching for racial justice.
You claim "hero status" for Rittenhouse, yet are silent about the Georgia "heroes"
He doesn't think anything. He is a random word generator as demonstrated by his pitiful attempt to formulate an analogy.
Rittenhouse is alive today because he had a weapon to defend himself. Arbrey is not alive because he had no weapon to defend himself against his assailants.
Rittenhouse is Arbrey with a gun in your analogy. Go back to school.
At least one of the guys attacking Rittenhouse thought he had just murdered somebody. One of many reasons Rittenhouse should never have left the dealership he was protecting, and especially not alone. It's absolutely vigilante justice, and Rittenhouse is lucky he didn't die. His actions put lives in danger.
Rawhide said:I would argue that the rioters are the ones that put lives in danger. Those rioters are idiots, especially the dead ones.Porteroso said:Amal Shuq-Up said:I am disputing your analogy. It is a pitiful analogy. Arbrey was running from a group of violent men. Rittenhouse was running from a group of violent men. Arbrey was forced to defend himself from three aggressors. Rittenhouse was forced to defend himself from three aggressors.Osodecentx said:An analogy nobody is disputingAmal Shuq-Up said:Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:The 3 men who killed Arbery claim to be protecting the community, the same claim you make for Rittenhouse.Wangchung said:Do you think the three rioters shot by Kyle were marching for racial justice?Osodecentx said:I don't blame youWangchung said:No.Osodecentx said:Do you think the 3 guys who killed Ahmaud Arbery are heroes who were fighting anarchy?Wangchung said:
Disagree on C. When politicians hold back police and allow riots to continue it is up to citizens to step in and stop the violence. Citizens are literally the last line of defense against anarchy.
The man killed by the Georgia defendants wasn't marching for racial justice.
You claim "hero status" for Rittenhouse, yet are silent about the Georgia "heroes"
He doesn't think anything. He is a random word generator as demonstrated by his pitiful attempt to formulate an analogy.
Rittenhouse is alive today because he had a weapon to defend himself. Arbrey is not alive because he had no weapon to defend himself against his assailants.
Rittenhouse is Arbrey with a gun in your analogy. Go back to school.
At least one of the guys attacking Rittenhouse thought he had just murdered somebody. One of many reasons Rittenhouse should never have left the dealership he was protecting, and especially not alone. It's absolutely vigilante justice, and Rittenhouse is lucky he didn't die. His actions put lives in danger.
You could say that same thing anytime a jury gets it wrong. Doesn't mean it was the "right" verdict.nein51 said:Mothra said:Not even remotely comparable. There was DNA evidence of Goldman and his ex-wife in OJ's car for goodness sake.nein51 said:
Right verdict just like OJ. You don't have to like the verdict for it to be correct.
Guy should have been convicted.
Yet the prosecution did not make that case in a way that Convinced 12 jurors. Literally the point I was making. You can think he is guilty but the prosecutor couldn't convince a jury of that. That is the system at work, imo.