Sam, as he so often does now, jumps on any headline w/o finding out the facts first.
It's RICO time,
— Minerone (@MinerOne21) April 27, 2025
1996 Expansion via IIRAIRA: The IIRAIRA, signed into law on September 30, 1996, strengthened U.S. immigration laws and amended the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). It specifically enhanced penalties for immigration-related offenses, including alien smuggling…
THIS SHOULD MAKE YOUR BLOOD BOIL!
— Charlie Kirk 🇺🇸 Commentary (@CharlieK_news) April 26, 2025
3,920,028 illegals were given Social Security and Medicaid in 4 years.
If each one of them was receiving $2k/mo that's $1,931,281,856 EVERY MONTH.
Whoever set this up needs to go to PRISON.
THEY RISKED OUR SENIOR’S LIFELINE.
Sam Lowry said:A true patriot…good for her.Redbrickbear said:🚨 ANOTHER ONE: Sawyer County, Wisconsin Judge Monica Isham is pushing back hard against the arrest of Milwaukee Judge Hannah Dugan, who was nabbed by the FBI for blocking an ICE arrest of an illegal alien.
— Publius (@OcrazioCornPop) April 26, 2025
Isham says she won’t let ICE snatch anyone from her courtroom without… pic.twitter.com/xUFPYY0uaD
Did Trump pledge no seizure without due process and I missed it?GrowlTowel said:Sam Lowry said:A true patriot…good for her.Redbrickbear said:🚨 ANOTHER ONE: Sawyer County, Wisconsin Judge Monica Isham is pushing back hard against the arrest of Milwaukee Judge Hannah Dugan, who was nabbed by the FBI for blocking an ICE arrest of an illegal alien.
— Publius (@OcrazioCornPop) April 26, 2025
Isham says she won’t let ICE snatch anyone from her courtroom without… pic.twitter.com/xUFPYY0uaD
Hmm. A judge picks which laws she wants to follow and she is a patriot?
Haven't you bled through your tampons claiming the exact opposite for Trump?
Judge's chambers? You think this all happened in her office? Hopefully, you've familiarized yourself with the details of the case a little better.Sam Lowry said:I'm not sure she did break the law. She will likely argue that a judge's chambers aren't public property for purposes of an administrative warrant.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:So judges who break the law shouldn't be arrested like the rest of us?Sam Lowry said:When you're assaulting Congress and arresting judges, you are waging war in a much more literal way than most of what the Democrats are doing. And I don't like most of what the Democrats are doing.Wangchung said:Bro, I freely admit most politicians of any stripe are corrupt. Only one side is actively attacking America on all fronts. The corrupt Republicans are out to enrich themselves.Sam Lowry said:Mostly true, all irrelevant.Wangchung said:
The people who haven't figured out that democrats are and have been actively at war with the rest of America are absolute morons. Open borders, sexualizing children, attacking the normal hetero marriage as oppressive, cheering on rioters and murderers, dividing us by every means possible be it race, sex or sexual preference, supporting forever wars and demanding government mandates for experimental vaccines while demonizing white straight Christians...the signs are all there.
If anything it's all the more reason we need a real conservative party and not this bunch of clowns.
The corrupt democrats are waging a war.
Keep hating illegals and liberals more than you love the Constitution, and pretty soon you're not going to have a Constitution.
So much for your "rule of law".
At the very least, an administration that wasn't trying to intimidate judges, lawyers, and witnesses wouldn't have handled her arrest in this way.
Trump was allowed to surrender four times, and booked on four sets of charges, as a private citizen, without ever being arrested and, in three of four cases, without posing for a mug shot.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:Judge's chambers? You think this all happened in her office? Hopefully, you've familiarized yourself with the details of the case a little better.Sam Lowry said:I'm not sure she did break the law. She will likely argue that a judge's chambers aren't public property for purposes of an administrative warrant.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:So judges who break the law shouldn't be arrested like the rest of us?Sam Lowry said:When you're assaulting Congress and arresting judges, you are waging war in a much more literal way than most of what the Democrats are doing. And I don't like most of what the Democrats are doing.Wangchung said:Bro, I freely admit most politicians of any stripe are corrupt. Only one side is actively attacking America on all fronts. The corrupt Republicans are out to enrich themselves.Sam Lowry said:Mostly true, all irrelevant.Wangchung said:
The people who haven't figured out that democrats are and have been actively at war with the rest of America are absolute morons. Open borders, sexualizing children, attacking the normal hetero marriage as oppressive, cheering on rioters and murderers, dividing us by every means possible be it race, sex or sexual preference, supporting forever wars and demanding government mandates for experimental vaccines while demonizing white straight Christians...the signs are all there.
If anything it's all the more reason we need a real conservative party and not this bunch of clowns.
The corrupt democrats are waging a war.
Keep hating illegals and liberals more than you love the Constitution, and pretty soon you're not going to have a Constitution.
So much for your "rule of law".
At the very least, an administration that wasn't trying to intimidate judges, lawyers, and witnesses wouldn't have handled her arrest in this way.
And they arrested her in the same way they would any of us if we too had obstructed and concealed from federal authorities to prevent them from doing their duty. That's what the "rule of law" that you've been preaching about looks like. I guess it's "intimidation" only when it happens to your side, huh?
GarbageSam Lowry said:A true patriot…good for her.Redbrickbear said:🚨 ANOTHER ONE: Sawyer County, Wisconsin Judge Monica Isham is pushing back hard against the arrest of Milwaukee Judge Hannah Dugan, who was nabbed by the FBI for blocking an ICE arrest of an illegal alien.
— Publius (@OcrazioCornPop) April 26, 2025
Isham says she won’t let ICE snatch anyone from her courtroom without… pic.twitter.com/xUFPYY0uaD
You're comparing her to a current and former President of the United States?!Sam Lowry said:Trump was allowed to surrender four times, and booked on four sets of charges, as a private citizen, without ever being arrested and, in three of four cases, without posing for a mug shot.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:Judge's chambers? You think this all happened in her office? Hopefully, you've familiarized yourself with the details of the case a little better.Sam Lowry said:I'm not sure she did break the law. She will likely argue that a judge's chambers aren't public property for purposes of an administrative warrant.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:So judges who break the law shouldn't be arrested like the rest of us?Sam Lowry said:When you're assaulting Congress and arresting judges, you are waging war in a much more literal way than most of what the Democrats are doing. And I don't like most of what the Democrats are doing.Wangchung said:Bro, I freely admit most politicians of any stripe are corrupt. Only one side is actively attacking America on all fronts. The corrupt Republicans are out to enrich themselves.Sam Lowry said:Mostly true, all irrelevant.Wangchung said:
The people who haven't figured out that democrats are and have been actively at war with the rest of America are absolute morons. Open borders, sexualizing children, attacking the normal hetero marriage as oppressive, cheering on rioters and murderers, dividing us by every means possible be it race, sex or sexual preference, supporting forever wars and demanding government mandates for experimental vaccines while demonizing white straight Christians...the signs are all there.
If anything it's all the more reason we need a real conservative party and not this bunch of clowns.
The corrupt democrats are waging a war.
Keep hating illegals and liberals more than you love the Constitution, and pretty soon you're not going to have a Constitution.
So much for your "rule of law".
At the very least, an administration that wasn't trying to intimidate judges, lawyers, and witnesses wouldn't have handled her arrest in this way.
And they arrested her in the same way they would any of us if we too had obstructed and concealed from federal authorities to prevent them from doing their duty. That's what the "rule of law" that you've been preaching about looks like. I guess it's "intimidation" only when it happens to your side, huh?
That's how one side avoids the impression that it's trying to intimidate.
Sorry, I didn't realize you thought presidents were special. How many times have you called for Biden's arrest again?BusyTarpDuster2017 said:You're comparing her to a current and former President of the United States?!Sam Lowry said:Trump was allowed to surrender four times, and booked on four sets of charges, as a private citizen, without ever being arrested and, in three of four cases, without posing for a mug shot.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:Judge's chambers? You think this all happened in her office? Hopefully, you've familiarized yourself with the details of the case a little better.Sam Lowry said:I'm not sure she did break the law. She will likely argue that a judge's chambers aren't public property for purposes of an administrative warrant.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:So judges who break the law shouldn't be arrested like the rest of us?Sam Lowry said:When you're assaulting Congress and arresting judges, you are waging war in a much more literal way than most of what the Democrats are doing. And I don't like most of what the Democrats are doing.Wangchung said:Bro, I freely admit most politicians of any stripe are corrupt. Only one side is actively attacking America on all fronts. The corrupt Republicans are out to enrich themselves.Sam Lowry said:Mostly true, all irrelevant.Wangchung said:
The people who haven't figured out that democrats are and have been actively at war with the rest of America are absolute morons. Open borders, sexualizing children, attacking the normal hetero marriage as oppressive, cheering on rioters and murderers, dividing us by every means possible be it race, sex or sexual preference, supporting forever wars and demanding government mandates for experimental vaccines while demonizing white straight Christians...the signs are all there.
If anything it's all the more reason we need a real conservative party and not this bunch of clowns.
The corrupt democrats are waging a war.
Keep hating illegals and liberals more than you love the Constitution, and pretty soon you're not going to have a Constitution.
So much for your "rule of law".
At the very least, an administration that wasn't trying to intimidate judges, lawyers, and witnesses wouldn't have handled her arrest in this way.
And they arrested her in the same way they would any of us if we too had obstructed and concealed from federal authorities to prevent them from doing their duty. That's what the "rule of law" that you've been preaching about looks like. I guess it's "intimidation" only when it happens to your side, huh?
That's how one side avoids the impression that it's trying to intimidate.
And HOW do you not see that four sets of charges and a mugshot for a former and current President is exactly what intimidation looks like? Wow.
Of course they're special. They're an entire branch of government. Quite a bit more national security interest in them, don't you think? You obviously can't just willy nilly cuff them, put them in a car, and take them somewhere. Everything's gotta be controlled and secured to the highest degree. Except if you're the Democrats in charge of Trump's secret service, that is... cough, cough. But you know all this. And I never called for Biden's arrest. I do think what he did was nothing short of traitorous, though, but I don't really fault him entirely. He wasn't really the one making policy. He was just the nice, old white grandpa that kids can trick into signing their report card in lieu of their parents because their grades were terrible.Sam Lowry said:Sorry, I didn't realize you thought presidents were special. How many times have you called for Biden's arrest again?BusyTarpDuster2017 said:You're comparing her to a current and former President of the United States?!Sam Lowry said:Trump was allowed to surrender four times, and booked on four sets of charges, as a private citizen, without ever being arrested and, in three of four cases, without posing for a mug shot.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:Judge's chambers? You think this all happened in her office? Hopefully, you've familiarized yourself with the details of the case a little better.Sam Lowry said:I'm not sure she did break the law. She will likely argue that a judge's chambers aren't public property for purposes of an administrative warrant.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:So judges who break the law shouldn't be arrested like the rest of us?Sam Lowry said:When you're assaulting Congress and arresting judges, you are waging war in a much more literal way than most of what the Democrats are doing. And I don't like most of what the Democrats are doing.Wangchung said:Bro, I freely admit most politicians of any stripe are corrupt. Only one side is actively attacking America on all fronts. The corrupt Republicans are out to enrich themselves.Sam Lowry said:Mostly true, all irrelevant.Wangchung said:
The people who haven't figured out that democrats are and have been actively at war with the rest of America are absolute morons. Open borders, sexualizing children, attacking the normal hetero marriage as oppressive, cheering on rioters and murderers, dividing us by every means possible be it race, sex or sexual preference, supporting forever wars and demanding government mandates for experimental vaccines while demonizing white straight Christians...the signs are all there.
If anything it's all the more reason we need a real conservative party and not this bunch of clowns.
The corrupt democrats are waging a war.
Keep hating illegals and liberals more than you love the Constitution, and pretty soon you're not going to have a Constitution.
So much for your "rule of law".
At the very least, an administration that wasn't trying to intimidate judges, lawyers, and witnesses wouldn't have handled her arrest in this way.
And they arrested her in the same way they would any of us if we too had obstructed and concealed from federal authorities to prevent them from doing their duty. That's what the "rule of law" that you've been preaching about looks like. I guess it's "intimidation" only when it happens to your side, huh?
That's how one side avoids the impression that it's trying to intimidate.
And HOW do you not see that four sets of charges and a mugshot for a former and current President is exactly what intimidation looks like? Wow.
LOL. The guy brags about stealing classified documents, but you can't cuff him because "national security." You folks really do love your king.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:Of course they're special. They're an entire branch of government. Quite a bit more national security interest in them, don't you think? You obviously can't just willy nilly cuff them, put them in a car, and take them somewhere. Everything's gotta be controlled and secured to the highest degree. Except if you're the Democrats in charge of Trump's secret service, that is... cough, cough. But you know all this. And I never called for Biden's arrest. I do think what he did was nothing short of traitorous, though, but I don't really fault him entirely. He wasn't really the one making policy. He was just the nice, old white grandpa that kids can trick into signing their report card in lieu of their parents because their grades were terrible.Sam Lowry said:Sorry, I didn't realize you thought presidents were special. How many times have you called for Biden's arrest again?BusyTarpDuster2017 said:You're comparing her to a current and former President of the United States?!Sam Lowry said:Trump was allowed to surrender four times, and booked on four sets of charges, as a private citizen, without ever being arrested and, in three of four cases, without posing for a mug shot.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:Judge's chambers? You think this all happened in her office? Hopefully, you've familiarized yourself with the details of the case a little better.Sam Lowry said:I'm not sure she did break the law. She will likely argue that a judge's chambers aren't public property for purposes of an administrative warrant.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:So judges who break the law shouldn't be arrested like the rest of us?Sam Lowry said:When you're assaulting Congress and arresting judges, you are waging war in a much more literal way than most of what the Democrats are doing. And I don't like most of what the Democrats are doing.Wangchung said:Bro, I freely admit most politicians of any stripe are corrupt. Only one side is actively attacking America on all fronts. The corrupt Republicans are out to enrich themselves.Sam Lowry said:Mostly true, all irrelevant.Wangchung said:
The people who haven't figured out that democrats are and have been actively at war with the rest of America are absolute morons. Open borders, sexualizing children, attacking the normal hetero marriage as oppressive, cheering on rioters and murderers, dividing us by every means possible be it race, sex or sexual preference, supporting forever wars and demanding government mandates for experimental vaccines while demonizing white straight Christians...the signs are all there.
If anything it's all the more reason we need a real conservative party and not this bunch of clowns.
The corrupt democrats are waging a war.
Keep hating illegals and liberals more than you love the Constitution, and pretty soon you're not going to have a Constitution.
So much for your "rule of law".
At the very least, an administration that wasn't trying to intimidate judges, lawyers, and witnesses wouldn't have handled her arrest in this way.
And they arrested her in the same way they would any of us if we too had obstructed and concealed from federal authorities to prevent them from doing their duty. That's what the "rule of law" that you've been preaching about looks like. I guess it's "intimidation" only when it happens to your side, huh?
That's how one side avoids the impression that it's trying to intimidate.
And HOW do you not see that four sets of charges and a mugshot for a former and current President is exactly what intimidation looks like? Wow.
I don't love Trump the way you're making it. But I'm certainly not like you, with so much TDS that I can't see straight. You're off the deep end with all this "fascism", judges who break the law can't be arrested, and the President should be cuffed nonsense talk.Sam Lowry said:LOL. The guy brags about stealing classified documents, but you can't cuff him because "national security." You folks really do love your king.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:Of course they're special. They're an entire branch of government. Quite a bit more national security interest in them, don't you think? You obviously can't just willy nilly cuff them, put them in a car, and take them somewhere. Everything's gotta be controlled and secured to the highest degree. Except if you're the Democrats in charge of Trump's secret service, that is... cough, cough. But you know all this. And I never called for Biden's arrest. I do think what he did was nothing short of traitorous, though, but I don't really fault him entirely. He wasn't really the one making policy. He was just the nice, old white grandpa that kids can trick into signing their report card in lieu of their parents because their grades were terrible.Sam Lowry said:Sorry, I didn't realize you thought presidents were special. How many times have you called for Biden's arrest again?BusyTarpDuster2017 said:You're comparing her to a current and former President of the United States?!Sam Lowry said:Trump was allowed to surrender four times, and booked on four sets of charges, as a private citizen, without ever being arrested and, in three of four cases, without posing for a mug shot.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:Judge's chambers? You think this all happened in her office? Hopefully, you've familiarized yourself with the details of the case a little better.Sam Lowry said:I'm not sure she did break the law. She will likely argue that a judge's chambers aren't public property for purposes of an administrative warrant.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:So judges who break the law shouldn't be arrested like the rest of us?Sam Lowry said:When you're assaulting Congress and arresting judges, you are waging war in a much more literal way than most of what the Democrats are doing. And I don't like most of what the Democrats are doing.Wangchung said:Bro, I freely admit most politicians of any stripe are corrupt. Only one side is actively attacking America on all fronts. The corrupt Republicans are out to enrich themselves.Sam Lowry said:Mostly true, all irrelevant.Wangchung said:
The people who haven't figured out that democrats are and have been actively at war with the rest of America are absolute morons. Open borders, sexualizing children, attacking the normal hetero marriage as oppressive, cheering on rioters and murderers, dividing us by every means possible be it race, sex or sexual preference, supporting forever wars and demanding government mandates for experimental vaccines while demonizing white straight Christians...the signs are all there.
If anything it's all the more reason we need a real conservative party and not this bunch of clowns.
The corrupt democrats are waging a war.
Keep hating illegals and liberals more than you love the Constitution, and pretty soon you're not going to have a Constitution.
So much for your "rule of law".
At the very least, an administration that wasn't trying to intimidate judges, lawyers, and witnesses wouldn't have handled her arrest in this way.
And they arrested her in the same way they would any of us if we too had obstructed and concealed from federal authorities to prevent them from doing their duty. That's what the "rule of law" that you've been preaching about looks like. I guess it's "intimidation" only when it happens to your side, huh?
That's how one side avoids the impression that it's trying to intimidate.
And HOW do you not see that four sets of charges and a mugshot for a former and current President is exactly what intimidation looks like? Wow.
Look, I agree that Trump should have been treated with all possible courtesy, and for the most part he was. It's no different with a judge.
EatMoreSalmon said:GarbageSam Lowry said:A true patriot…good for her.Redbrickbear said:🚨 ANOTHER ONE: Sawyer County, Wisconsin Judge Monica Isham is pushing back hard against the arrest of Milwaukee Judge Hannah Dugan, who was nabbed by the FBI for blocking an ICE arrest of an illegal alien.
— Publius (@OcrazioCornPop) April 26, 2025
Isham says she won’t let ICE snatch anyone from her courtroom without… pic.twitter.com/xUFPYY0uaD
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:Of course they're special. They're an entire branch of government. Quite a bit more national security interest in them, don't you think? You obviously can't just willy nilly cuff them, put them in a car, and take them somewhere. Everything's gotta be controlled and secured to the highest degree. Except if you're the Democrats in charge of Trump's secret service, that is... cough, cough. But you know all this. And I never called for Biden's arrest. I do think what he did was nothing short of traitorous, though, but I don't really fault him entirely. He wasn't really the one making policy. He was just the nice, old white grandpa that kids can trick into signing their report card in lieu of their parents because their grades were terrible.Sam Lowry said:Sorry, I didn't realize you thought presidents were special. How many times have you called for Biden's arrest again?BusyTarpDuster2017 said:You're comparing her to a current and former President of the United States?!Sam Lowry said:Trump was allowed to surrender four times, and booked on four sets of charges, as a private citizen, without ever being arrested and, in three of four cases, without posing for a mug shot.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:Judge's chambers? You think this all happened in her office? Hopefully, you've familiarized yourself with the details of the case a little better.Sam Lowry said:I'm not sure she did break the law. She will likely argue that a judge's chambers aren't public property for purposes of an administrative warrant.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:So judges who break the law shouldn't be arrested like the rest of us?Sam Lowry said:When you're assaulting Congress and arresting judges, you are waging war in a much more literal way than most of what the Democrats are doing. And I don't like most of what the Democrats are doing.Wangchung said:Bro, I freely admit most politicians of any stripe are corrupt. Only one side is actively attacking America on all fronts. The corrupt Republicans are out to enrich themselves.Sam Lowry said:Mostly true, all irrelevant.Wangchung said:
The people who haven't figured out that democrats are and have been actively at war with the rest of America are absolute morons. Open borders, sexualizing children, attacking the normal hetero marriage as oppressive, cheering on rioters and murderers, dividing us by every means possible be it race, sex or sexual preference, supporting forever wars and demanding government mandates for experimental vaccines while demonizing white straight Christians...the signs are all there.
If anything it's all the more reason we need a real conservative party and not this bunch of clowns.
The corrupt democrats are waging a war.
Keep hating illegals and liberals more than you love the Constitution, and pretty soon you're not going to have a Constitution.
So much for your "rule of law".
At the very least, an administration that wasn't trying to intimidate judges, lawyers, and witnesses wouldn't have handled her arrest in this way.
And they arrested her in the same way they would any of us if we too had obstructed and concealed from federal authorities to prevent them from doing their duty. That's what the "rule of law" that you've been preaching about looks like. I guess it's "intimidation" only when it happens to your side, huh?
That's how one side avoids the impression that it's trying to intimidate.
And HOW do you not see that four sets of charges and a mugshot for a former and current President is exactly what intimidation looks like? Wow.
Sam Lowry said:Trump was given due process and an awful lot of deference as well. Much more than this judge apparently received.Wangchung said:Well I haven't seen the evidence for myself so I don't know if those judges were honest or not! Isn't that how you say it works? Trump wasn't given Due Process because I didn't see the evidence! Why don't you believe in Due Process, fascist?Sam Lowry said:More like you fixed it for projection. Trump and his insurrectionist cult are the ones who routinely cry foul when the evidence is against them. That's why he spent the last four years filling your feed pan with all the anti-judge propaganda you could hold.Wangchung said:FIFY for honesty.Sam Lowry said:I don't need to tie myself in knots like you. My position is simple: claim due process wasn't given if I don't like the outcome of the due process they were given.Wangchung said:Of course you aren't sure she broke the law, you aren't honest enough to admit she got caught so you hide behind, "well I personally didn't see the evidence therefor I can't really say..." but if it were Trump or those scary unarmed January Sixers you would break your hands typing out condemnation as fast as your little limp wrists could manage.Sam Lowry said:I'm not sure she did break the law. She will likely argue that a judge's chambers aren't public property for purposes of an administrative warrant.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:So judges who break the law shouldn't be arrested like the rest of us?Sam Lowry said:When you're assaulting Congress and arresting judges, you are waging war in a much more literal way than most of what the Democrats are doing. And I don't like most of what the Democrats are doing.Wangchung said:Bro, I freely admit most politicians of any stripe are corrupt. Only one side is actively attacking America on all fronts. The corrupt Republicans are out to enrich themselves.Sam Lowry said:Mostly true, all irrelevant.Wangchung said:
The people who haven't figured out that democrats are and have been actively at war with the rest of America are absolute morons. Open borders, sexualizing children, attacking the normal hetero marriage as oppressive, cheering on rioters and murderers, dividing us by every means possible be it race, sex or sexual preference, supporting forever wars and demanding government mandates for experimental vaccines while demonizing white straight Christians...the signs are all there.
If anything it's all the more reason we need a real conservative party and not this bunch of clowns.
The corrupt democrats are waging a war.
Keep hating illegals and liberals more than you love the Constitution, and pretty soon you're not going to have a Constitution.
So much for your "rule of law".
At the very least, an administration that wasn't trying to intimidate judges, lawyers, and witnesses wouldn't have handled her arrest in this way.
We have been arresting or suing anyone we don't like, with or without a valid warrant, evidence, or a hearing, and now we hate that American voters have turned the tables on us. Now we claim Trump is saying we should start disappearing US citizens. In your "honest" opinion, is he right?
Assassin said:THIS SHOULD MAKE YOUR BLOOD BOIL!
— Charlie Kirk 🇺🇸 Commentary (@CharlieK_news) April 26, 2025
3,920,028 illegals were given Social Security and Medicaid in 4 years.
If each one of them was receiving $2k/mo that's $1,931,281,856 EVERY MONTH.
Whoever set this up needs to go to PRISON.
THEY RISKED OUR SENIOR’S LIFELINE.
I think they are sayinjg that 2bil is the total per year per month over 4 years. Still incredibleScottS said:Assassin said:THIS SHOULD MAKE YOUR BLOOD BOIL!
— Charlie Kirk 🇺🇸 Commentary (@CharlieK_news) April 26, 2025
3,920,028 illegals were given Social Security and Medicaid in 4 years.
If each one of them was receiving $2k/mo that's $1,931,281,856 EVERY MONTH.
Whoever set this up needs to go to PRISON.
THEY RISKED OUR SENIOR’S LIFELINE.
Wouldn't it be more like 8B a month? 4M X 2K would that be near 8B not 2B?
Good Morning from The White House! pic.twitter.com/1fhjzMU2gR
— Karoline Leavitt (@PressSec) April 28, 2025
ScottS said:Sam Lowry said:Trump was given due process and an awful lot of deference as well. Much more than this judge apparently received.Wangchung said:Well I haven't seen the evidence for myself so I don't know if those judges were honest or not! Isn't that how you say it works? Trump wasn't given Due Process because I didn't see the evidence! Why don't you believe in Due Process, fascist?Sam Lowry said:More like you fixed it for projection. Trump and his insurrectionist cult are the ones who routinely cry foul when the evidence is against them. That's why he spent the last four years filling your feed pan with all the anti-judge propaganda you could hold.Wangchung said:FIFY for honesty.Sam Lowry said:I don't need to tie myself in knots like you. My position is simple: claim due process wasn't given if I don't like the outcome of the due process they were given.Wangchung said:Of course you aren't sure she broke the law, you aren't honest enough to admit she got caught so you hide behind, "well I personally didn't see the evidence therefor I can't really say..." but if it were Trump or those scary unarmed January Sixers you would break your hands typing out condemnation as fast as your little limp wrists could manage.Sam Lowry said:I'm not sure she did break the law. She will likely argue that a judge's chambers aren't public property for purposes of an administrative warrant.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:So judges who break the law shouldn't be arrested like the rest of us?Sam Lowry said:When you're assaulting Congress and arresting judges, you are waging war in a much more literal way than most of what the Democrats are doing. And I don't like most of what the Democrats are doing.Wangchung said:Bro, I freely admit most politicians of any stripe are corrupt. Only one side is actively attacking America on all fronts. The corrupt Republicans are out to enrich themselves.Sam Lowry said:Mostly true, all irrelevant.Wangchung said:
The people who haven't figured out that democrats are and have been actively at war with the rest of America are absolute morons. Open borders, sexualizing children, attacking the normal hetero marriage as oppressive, cheering on rioters and murderers, dividing us by every means possible be it race, sex or sexual preference, supporting forever wars and demanding government mandates for experimental vaccines while demonizing white straight Christians...the signs are all there.
If anything it's all the more reason we need a real conservative party and not this bunch of clowns.
The corrupt democrats are waging a war.
Keep hating illegals and liberals more than you love the Constitution, and pretty soon you're not going to have a Constitution.
So much for your "rule of law".
At the very least, an administration that wasn't trying to intimidate judges, lawyers, and witnesses wouldn't have handled her arrest in this way.
We have been arresting or suing anyone we don't like, with or without a valid warrant, evidence, or a hearing, and now we hate that American voters have turned the tables on us. Now we claim Trump is saying we should start disappearing US citizens. In your "honest" opinion, is he right?
Trump was given due process in front of kangaroo courts.
Assassin said:Good Morning from The White House! pic.twitter.com/1fhjzMU2gR
— Karoline Leavitt (@PressSec) April 28, 2025
But not to thier neighborhoodsScottS said:Assassin said:Good Morning from The White House! pic.twitter.com/1fhjzMU2gR
— Karoline Leavitt (@PressSec) April 28, 2025
The left says bring them all back to the USA.
🚨 Karoline Leavitt just dropped a bombshell: Trump has officially declared war on sanctuary cities.
— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) April 28, 2025
Leavitt and Tom Homan held a blistering press conference, breaking down what’s already been accomplished—and what’s still coming to fix America’s illegal alien crisis.
You don’t… pic.twitter.com/99qeFNn9M8
It's like when you have to pass gas really badly, but you're in front of the church in the pulpit. You can't really let go, but you know it's not up to you at some point. Nature takes it's course.Waco1947 said:
Wage suppression?what do you mean?
[A surplus of labor will lead to increased competition among job seekers, driving wages down as workers are willing to accept lower pay to secure employment.]Waco1947 said:
Wage suppression? what do you mean?
Assassin said:It's like when you have to pass gas really badly, but you're in front of the church in the pulpit. You can't really let go, but you know it's not up to you at some point. Nature takes it's course.Waco1947 said:
Wage suppression?what do you mean?
And you realize it wasn't all gas...
No sh... kidding!ScottS said:An interesting day at churchAssassin said:It's like when you have to pass gas really badly, but you're in front of the church in the pulpit. You can't really let go, but you know it's not up to you at some point. Nature takes it's course.Waco1947 said:
Wage suppression?what do you mean?
And you realize it wasn't all gas...
No. They live in gated communities with armed guards. The fascist elitists rarely face the consequences of the insane ideas they push on the rest of us.Assassin said:But not to thier neighborhoodsScottS said:Assassin said:Good Morning from The White House! pic.twitter.com/1fhjzMU2gR
— Karoline Leavitt (@PressSec) April 28, 2025
The left says bring them all back to the USA.
ECON 101: the law of supply and demandRedbrickbear said:[A surplus of labor will lead to increased competition among job seekers, driving wages down as workers are willing to accept lower pay to secure employment.]Waco1947 said:
Wage suppression? what do you mean?
[In a situation of excess supply in the labor market, with many applicants for every job opening, employers will have an incentive to offer lower wages than they otherwise would have. Nurses' salary will move down toward equilibrium.]
Flood any country will migrants and wages will decline or remain stagnant