Federal Judge blocks Trump from deporting illegal alien gang members

212,192 Views | 2534 Replies | Last: 2 mo ago by Assassin
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lie.

Sam, as he so often does now, jumps on any headline w/o finding out the facts first.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
larga-te.....................

- el KKM

D!
arbyscoin - the only crypto you can eat.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Redbrickbear said:


A true patriot…good for her.


Hmm. A judge picks which laws she wants to follow and she is a patriot?

Haven't you bled through your tampons claiming the exact opposite for Trump?
Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
gtownbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
To think we have allowed our country to get to this state. Prosecute our judges who have broken the law and deport the illegals. I have written Chief Justice Roberts once over his actions and Justice Coney Barrett twice over her decisions. We have that right. No threats, no anger, just reasons that you respectfully disagree with their actions or decisions.

There is so much to do but the time is at hand.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

Sam Lowry said:

Redbrickbear said:


A true patriot…good for her.


Hmm. A judge picks which laws she wants to follow and she is a patriot?

Haven't you bled through your tampons claiming the exact opposite for Trump?
Did Trump pledge no seizure without due process and I missed it?
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

The people who haven't figured out that democrats are and have been actively at war with the rest of America are absolute morons. Open borders, sexualizing children, attacking the normal hetero marriage as oppressive, cheering on rioters and murderers, dividing us by every means possible be it race, sex or sexual preference, supporting forever wars and demanding government mandates for experimental vaccines while demonizing white straight Christians...the signs are all there.
Mostly true, all irrelevant.

If anything it's all the more reason we need a real conservative party and not this bunch of clowns.
Bro, I freely admit most politicians of any stripe are corrupt. Only one side is actively attacking America on all fronts. The corrupt Republicans are out to enrich themselves.
The corrupt democrats are waging a war.
When you're assaulting Congress and arresting judges, you are waging war in a much more literal way than most of what the Democrats are doing. And I don't like most of what the Democrats are doing.

Keep hating illegals and liberals more than you love the Constitution, and pretty soon you're not going to have a Constitution.
So judges who break the law shouldn't be arrested like the rest of us?

So much for your "rule of law".
I'm not sure she did break the law. She will likely argue that a judge's chambers aren't public property for purposes of an administrative warrant.

At the very least, an administration that wasn't trying to intimidate judges, lawyers, and witnesses wouldn't have handled her arrest in this way.
Judge's chambers? You think this all happened in her office? Hopefully, you've familiarized yourself with the details of the case a little better.

And they arrested her in the same way they would any of us if we too had obstructed and concealed from federal authorities to prevent them from doing their duty. That's what the "rule of law" that you've been preaching about looks like. I guess it's "intimidation" only when it happens to your side, huh?
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

The people who haven't figured out that democrats are and have been actively at war with the rest of America are absolute morons. Open borders, sexualizing children, attacking the normal hetero marriage as oppressive, cheering on rioters and murderers, dividing us by every means possible be it race, sex or sexual preference, supporting forever wars and demanding government mandates for experimental vaccines while demonizing white straight Christians...the signs are all there.
Mostly true, all irrelevant.

If anything it's all the more reason we need a real conservative party and not this bunch of clowns.
Bro, I freely admit most politicians of any stripe are corrupt. Only one side is actively attacking America on all fronts. The corrupt Republicans are out to enrich themselves.
The corrupt democrats are waging a war.
When you're assaulting Congress and arresting judges, you are waging war in a much more literal way than most of what the Democrats are doing. And I don't like most of what the Democrats are doing.

Keep hating illegals and liberals more than you love the Constitution, and pretty soon you're not going to have a Constitution.
So judges who break the law shouldn't be arrested like the rest of us?

So much for your "rule of law".
I'm not sure she did break the law. She will likely argue that a judge's chambers aren't public property for purposes of an administrative warrant.

At the very least, an administration that wasn't trying to intimidate judges, lawyers, and witnesses wouldn't have handled her arrest in this way.
Judge's chambers? You think this all happened in her office? Hopefully, you've familiarized yourself with the details of the case a little better.

And they arrested her in the same way they would any of us if we too had obstructed and concealed from federal authorities to prevent them from doing their duty. That's what the "rule of law" that you've been preaching about looks like. I guess it's "intimidation" only when it happens to your side, huh?
Trump was allowed to surrender four times, and booked on four sets of charges, as a private citizen, without ever being arrested and, in three of four cases, without posing for a mug shot.

That's how one side avoids the impression that it's trying to intimidate.
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Redbrickbear said:


A true patriot…good for her.
Garbage
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

The people who haven't figured out that democrats are and have been actively at war with the rest of America are absolute morons. Open borders, sexualizing children, attacking the normal hetero marriage as oppressive, cheering on rioters and murderers, dividing us by every means possible be it race, sex or sexual preference, supporting forever wars and demanding government mandates for experimental vaccines while demonizing white straight Christians...the signs are all there.
Mostly true, all irrelevant.

If anything it's all the more reason we need a real conservative party and not this bunch of clowns.
Bro, I freely admit most politicians of any stripe are corrupt. Only one side is actively attacking America on all fronts. The corrupt Republicans are out to enrich themselves.
The corrupt democrats are waging a war.
When you're assaulting Congress and arresting judges, you are waging war in a much more literal way than most of what the Democrats are doing. And I don't like most of what the Democrats are doing.

Keep hating illegals and liberals more than you love the Constitution, and pretty soon you're not going to have a Constitution.
So judges who break the law shouldn't be arrested like the rest of us?

So much for your "rule of law".
I'm not sure she did break the law. She will likely argue that a judge's chambers aren't public property for purposes of an administrative warrant.

At the very least, an administration that wasn't trying to intimidate judges, lawyers, and witnesses wouldn't have handled her arrest in this way.
Judge's chambers? You think this all happened in her office? Hopefully, you've familiarized yourself with the details of the case a little better.

And they arrested her in the same way they would any of us if we too had obstructed and concealed from federal authorities to prevent them from doing their duty. That's what the "rule of law" that you've been preaching about looks like. I guess it's "intimidation" only when it happens to your side, huh?
Trump was allowed to surrender four times, and booked on four sets of charges, as a private citizen, without ever being arrested and, in three of four cases, without posing for a mug shot.

That's how one side avoids the impression that it's trying to intimidate.
You're comparing her to a current and former President of the United States?!

And HOW do you not see that four sets of charges and a mugshot for a former and current President is exactly what intimidation looks like? Wow.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

The people who haven't figured out that democrats are and have been actively at war with the rest of America are absolute morons. Open borders, sexualizing children, attacking the normal hetero marriage as oppressive, cheering on rioters and murderers, dividing us by every means possible be it race, sex or sexual preference, supporting forever wars and demanding government mandates for experimental vaccines while demonizing white straight Christians...the signs are all there.
Mostly true, all irrelevant.

If anything it's all the more reason we need a real conservative party and not this bunch of clowns.
Bro, I freely admit most politicians of any stripe are corrupt. Only one side is actively attacking America on all fronts. The corrupt Republicans are out to enrich themselves.
The corrupt democrats are waging a war.
When you're assaulting Congress and arresting judges, you are waging war in a much more literal way than most of what the Democrats are doing. And I don't like most of what the Democrats are doing.

Keep hating illegals and liberals more than you love the Constitution, and pretty soon you're not going to have a Constitution.
So judges who break the law shouldn't be arrested like the rest of us?

So much for your "rule of law".
I'm not sure she did break the law. She will likely argue that a judge's chambers aren't public property for purposes of an administrative warrant.

At the very least, an administration that wasn't trying to intimidate judges, lawyers, and witnesses wouldn't have handled her arrest in this way.
Judge's chambers? You think this all happened in her office? Hopefully, you've familiarized yourself with the details of the case a little better.

And they arrested her in the same way they would any of us if we too had obstructed and concealed from federal authorities to prevent them from doing their duty. That's what the "rule of law" that you've been preaching about looks like. I guess it's "intimidation" only when it happens to your side, huh?
Trump was allowed to surrender four times, and booked on four sets of charges, as a private citizen, without ever being arrested and, in three of four cases, without posing for a mug shot.

That's how one side avoids the impression that it's trying to intimidate.
You're comparing her to a current and former President of the United States?!

And HOW do you not see that four sets of charges and a mugshot for a former and current President is exactly what intimidation looks like? Wow.
Sorry, I didn't realize you thought presidents were special. How many times have you called for Biden's arrest again?
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

The people who haven't figured out that democrats are and have been actively at war with the rest of America are absolute morons. Open borders, sexualizing children, attacking the normal hetero marriage as oppressive, cheering on rioters and murderers, dividing us by every means possible be it race, sex or sexual preference, supporting forever wars and demanding government mandates for experimental vaccines while demonizing white straight Christians...the signs are all there.
Mostly true, all irrelevant.

If anything it's all the more reason we need a real conservative party and not this bunch of clowns.
Bro, I freely admit most politicians of any stripe are corrupt. Only one side is actively attacking America on all fronts. The corrupt Republicans are out to enrich themselves.
The corrupt democrats are waging a war.
When you're assaulting Congress and arresting judges, you are waging war in a much more literal way than most of what the Democrats are doing. And I don't like most of what the Democrats are doing.

Keep hating illegals and liberals more than you love the Constitution, and pretty soon you're not going to have a Constitution.
So judges who break the law shouldn't be arrested like the rest of us?

So much for your "rule of law".
I'm not sure she did break the law. She will likely argue that a judge's chambers aren't public property for purposes of an administrative warrant.

At the very least, an administration that wasn't trying to intimidate judges, lawyers, and witnesses wouldn't have handled her arrest in this way.
Judge's chambers? You think this all happened in her office? Hopefully, you've familiarized yourself with the details of the case a little better.

And they arrested her in the same way they would any of us if we too had obstructed and concealed from federal authorities to prevent them from doing their duty. That's what the "rule of law" that you've been preaching about looks like. I guess it's "intimidation" only when it happens to your side, huh?
Trump was allowed to surrender four times, and booked on four sets of charges, as a private citizen, without ever being arrested and, in three of four cases, without posing for a mug shot.

That's how one side avoids the impression that it's trying to intimidate.
You're comparing her to a current and former President of the United States?!

And HOW do you not see that four sets of charges and a mugshot for a former and current President is exactly what intimidation looks like? Wow.
Sorry, I didn't realize you thought presidents were special. How many times have you called for Biden's arrest again?
Of course they're special. They're an entire branch of government. Quite a bit more national security interest in them, don't you think? You obviously can't just willy nilly cuff them, put them in a car, and take them somewhere. Everything's gotta be controlled and secured to the highest degree. Except if you're the Democrats in charge of Trump's secret service, that is... cough, cough. But you know all this. And I never called for Biden's arrest. I do think what he did was nothing short of traitorous, though, but I don't really fault him entirely. He wasn't really the one making policy. He was just the nice, old white grandpa that kids can trick into signing their report card in lieu of their parents because their grades were terrible.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

The people who haven't figured out that democrats are and have been actively at war with the rest of America are absolute morons. Open borders, sexualizing children, attacking the normal hetero marriage as oppressive, cheering on rioters and murderers, dividing us by every means possible be it race, sex or sexual preference, supporting forever wars and demanding government mandates for experimental vaccines while demonizing white straight Christians...the signs are all there.
Mostly true, all irrelevant.

If anything it's all the more reason we need a real conservative party and not this bunch of clowns.
Bro, I freely admit most politicians of any stripe are corrupt. Only one side is actively attacking America on all fronts. The corrupt Republicans are out to enrich themselves.
The corrupt democrats are waging a war.
When you're assaulting Congress and arresting judges, you are waging war in a much more literal way than most of what the Democrats are doing. And I don't like most of what the Democrats are doing.

Keep hating illegals and liberals more than you love the Constitution, and pretty soon you're not going to have a Constitution.
So judges who break the law shouldn't be arrested like the rest of us?

So much for your "rule of law".
I'm not sure she did break the law. She will likely argue that a judge's chambers aren't public property for purposes of an administrative warrant.

At the very least, an administration that wasn't trying to intimidate judges, lawyers, and witnesses wouldn't have handled her arrest in this way.
Judge's chambers? You think this all happened in her office? Hopefully, you've familiarized yourself with the details of the case a little better.

And they arrested her in the same way they would any of us if we too had obstructed and concealed from federal authorities to prevent them from doing their duty. That's what the "rule of law" that you've been preaching about looks like. I guess it's "intimidation" only when it happens to your side, huh?
Trump was allowed to surrender four times, and booked on four sets of charges, as a private citizen, without ever being arrested and, in three of four cases, without posing for a mug shot.

That's how one side avoids the impression that it's trying to intimidate.
You're comparing her to a current and former President of the United States?!

And HOW do you not see that four sets of charges and a mugshot for a former and current President is exactly what intimidation looks like? Wow.
Sorry, I didn't realize you thought presidents were special. How many times have you called for Biden's arrest again?
Of course they're special. They're an entire branch of government. Quite a bit more national security interest in them, don't you think? You obviously can't just willy nilly cuff them, put them in a car, and take them somewhere. Everything's gotta be controlled and secured to the highest degree. Except if you're the Democrats in charge of Trump's secret service, that is... cough, cough. But you know all this. And I never called for Biden's arrest. I do think what he did was nothing short of traitorous, though, but I don't really fault him entirely. He wasn't really the one making policy. He was just the nice, old white grandpa that kids can trick into signing their report card in lieu of their parents because their grades were terrible.
LOL. The guy brags about stealing classified documents, but you can't cuff him because "national security." You folks really do love your king.

Look, I agree that Trump should have been treated with all possible courtesy, and for the most part he was. It's no different with a judge.
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

The people who haven't figured out that democrats are and have been actively at war with the rest of America are absolute morons. Open borders, sexualizing children, attacking the normal hetero marriage as oppressive, cheering on rioters and murderers, dividing us by every means possible be it race, sex or sexual preference, supporting forever wars and demanding government mandates for experimental vaccines while demonizing white straight Christians...the signs are all there.
Mostly true, all irrelevant.

If anything it's all the more reason we need a real conservative party and not this bunch of clowns.
Bro, I freely admit most politicians of any stripe are corrupt. Only one side is actively attacking America on all fronts. The corrupt Republicans are out to enrich themselves.
The corrupt democrats are waging a war.
When you're assaulting Congress and arresting judges, you are waging war in a much more literal way than most of what the Democrats are doing. And I don't like most of what the Democrats are doing.

Keep hating illegals and liberals more than you love the Constitution, and pretty soon you're not going to have a Constitution.
So judges who break the law shouldn't be arrested like the rest of us?

So much for your "rule of law".
I'm not sure she did break the law. She will likely argue that a judge's chambers aren't public property for purposes of an administrative warrant.

At the very least, an administration that wasn't trying to intimidate judges, lawyers, and witnesses wouldn't have handled her arrest in this way.
Judge's chambers? You think this all happened in her office? Hopefully, you've familiarized yourself with the details of the case a little better.

And they arrested her in the same way they would any of us if we too had obstructed and concealed from federal authorities to prevent them from doing their duty. That's what the "rule of law" that you've been preaching about looks like. I guess it's "intimidation" only when it happens to your side, huh?
Trump was allowed to surrender four times, and booked on four sets of charges, as a private citizen, without ever being arrested and, in three of four cases, without posing for a mug shot.

That's how one side avoids the impression that it's trying to intimidate.
You're comparing her to a current and former President of the United States?!

And HOW do you not see that four sets of charges and a mugshot for a former and current President is exactly what intimidation looks like? Wow.
Sorry, I didn't realize you thought presidents were special. How many times have you called for Biden's arrest again?
Of course they're special. They're an entire branch of government. Quite a bit more national security interest in them, don't you think? You obviously can't just willy nilly cuff them, put them in a car, and take them somewhere. Everything's gotta be controlled and secured to the highest degree. Except if you're the Democrats in charge of Trump's secret service, that is... cough, cough. But you know all this. And I never called for Biden's arrest. I do think what he did was nothing short of traitorous, though, but I don't really fault him entirely. He wasn't really the one making policy. He was just the nice, old white grandpa that kids can trick into signing their report card in lieu of their parents because their grades were terrible.
LOL. The guy brags about stealing classified documents, but you can't cuff him because "national security." You folks really do love your king.

Look, I agree that Trump should have been treated with all possible courtesy, and for the most part he was. It's no different with a judge.
I don't love Trump the way you're making it. But I'm certainly not like you, with so much TDS that I can't see straight. You're off the deep end with all this "fascism", judges who break the law can't be arrested, and the President should be cuffed nonsense talk.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

Redbrickbear said:


A true patriot…good for her.
Garbage

Maybe we need a special prison for AWFL judges!

AWFL = Angry White Female Leftist

If they break the law, they must be arrested & punished. To quote the Dems: "no one is above the law."
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

The people who haven't figured out that democrats are and have been actively at war with the rest of America are absolute morons. Open borders, sexualizing children, attacking the normal hetero marriage as oppressive, cheering on rioters and murderers, dividing us by every means possible be it race, sex or sexual preference, supporting forever wars and demanding government mandates for experimental vaccines while demonizing white straight Christians...the signs are all there.
Mostly true, all irrelevant.

If anything it's all the more reason we need a real conservative party and not this bunch of clowns.
Bro, I freely admit most politicians of any stripe are corrupt. Only one side is actively attacking America on all fronts. The corrupt Republicans are out to enrich themselves.
The corrupt democrats are waging a war.
When you're assaulting Congress and arresting judges, you are waging war in a much more literal way than most of what the Democrats are doing. And I don't like most of what the Democrats are doing.

Keep hating illegals and liberals more than you love the Constitution, and pretty soon you're not going to have a Constitution.
So judges who break the law shouldn't be arrested like the rest of us?

So much for your "rule of law".
I'm not sure she did break the law. She will likely argue that a judge's chambers aren't public property for purposes of an administrative warrant.

At the very least, an administration that wasn't trying to intimidate judges, lawyers, and witnesses wouldn't have handled her arrest in this way.
Judge's chambers? You think this all happened in her office? Hopefully, you've familiarized yourself with the details of the case a little better.

And they arrested her in the same way they would any of us if we too had obstructed and concealed from federal authorities to prevent them from doing their duty. That's what the "rule of law" that you've been preaching about looks like. I guess it's "intimidation" only when it happens to your side, huh?
Trump was allowed to surrender four times, and booked on four sets of charges, as a private citizen, without ever being arrested and, in three of four cases, without posing for a mug shot.

That's how one side avoids the impression that it's trying to intimidate.
You're comparing her to a current and former President of the United States?!

And HOW do you not see that four sets of charges and a mugshot for a former and current President is exactly what intimidation looks like? Wow.
Sorry, I didn't realize you thought presidents were special. How many times have you called for Biden's arrest again?
Of course they're special. They're an entire branch of government. Quite a bit more national security interest in them, don't you think? You obviously can't just willy nilly cuff them, put them in a car, and take them somewhere. Everything's gotta be controlled and secured to the highest degree. Except if you're the Democrats in charge of Trump's secret service, that is... cough, cough. But you know all this. And I never called for Biden's arrest. I do think what he did was nothing short of traitorous, though, but I don't really fault him entirely. He wasn't really the one making policy. He was just the nice, old white grandpa that kids can trick into signing their report card in lieu of their parents because their grades were terrible.

There is nothing "nice" about Biden: he's a petty, bitter, grumpy, corrupt, old pervert. He's not even much of a grandpa, refusing to acknowledge Hunter's daughter Navy as his grandchild. I honestly would not be very surprised if he were one of Epstein's clients. Surely, everyone has seen the photos or video clips of creepy Joe sniffing the hair of women & girls. They are disturbing to say the least.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

The people who haven't figured out that democrats are and have been actively at war with the rest of America are absolute morons. Open borders, sexualizing children, attacking the normal hetero marriage as oppressive, cheering on rioters and murderers, dividing us by every means possible be it race, sex or sexual preference, supporting forever wars and demanding government mandates for experimental vaccines while demonizing white straight Christians...the signs are all there.
Mostly true, all irrelevant.

If anything it's all the more reason we need a real conservative party and not this bunch of clowns.
Bro, I freely admit most politicians of any stripe are corrupt. Only one side is actively attacking America on all fronts. The corrupt Republicans are out to enrich themselves.
The corrupt democrats are waging a war.
When you're assaulting Congress and arresting judges, you are waging war in a much more literal way than most of what the Democrats are doing. And I don't like most of what the Democrats are doing.

Keep hating illegals and liberals more than you love the Constitution, and pretty soon you're not going to have a Constitution.
So judges who break the law shouldn't be arrested like the rest of us?

So much for your "rule of law".
I'm not sure she did break the law. She will likely argue that a judge's chambers aren't public property for purposes of an administrative warrant.

At the very least, an administration that wasn't trying to intimidate judges, lawyers, and witnesses wouldn't have handled her arrest in this way.
Of course you aren't sure she broke the law, you aren't honest enough to admit she got caught so you hide behind, "well I personally didn't see the evidence therefor I can't really say..." but if it were Trump or those scary unarmed January Sixers you would break your hands typing out condemnation as fast as your little limp wrists could manage.
I don't need to tie myself in knots like you. My position is simple: claim due process wasn't given if I don't like the outcome of the due process they were given.

We have been arresting or suing anyone we don't like, with or without a valid warrant, evidence, or a hearing, and now we hate that American voters have turned the tables on us. Now we claim Trump is saying we should start disappearing US citizens. In your "honest" opinion, is he right?
FIFY for honesty.
More like you fixed it for projection. Trump and his insurrectionist cult are the ones who routinely cry foul when the evidence is against them. That's why he spent the last four years filling your feed pan with all the anti-judge propaganda you could hold.
Well I haven't seen the evidence for myself so I don't know if those judges were honest or not! Isn't that how you say it works? Trump wasn't given Due Process because I didn't see the evidence! Why don't you believe in Due Process, fascist?
Trump was given due process and an awful lot of deference as well. Much more than this judge apparently received.

Trump was given due process in front of kangaroo courts.
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:



Wouldn't it be more like 8B a month? 4M X 2K would that be near 8B not 2B?
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ScottS said:

Assassin said:



Wouldn't it be more like 8B a month? 4M X 2K would that be near 8B not 2B?
I think they are sayinjg that 2bil is the total per year per month over 4 years. Still incredible
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ScottS said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

The people who haven't figured out that democrats are and have been actively at war with the rest of America are absolute morons. Open borders, sexualizing children, attacking the normal hetero marriage as oppressive, cheering on rioters and murderers, dividing us by every means possible be it race, sex or sexual preference, supporting forever wars and demanding government mandates for experimental vaccines while demonizing white straight Christians...the signs are all there.
Mostly true, all irrelevant.

If anything it's all the more reason we need a real conservative party and not this bunch of clowns.
Bro, I freely admit most politicians of any stripe are corrupt. Only one side is actively attacking America on all fronts. The corrupt Republicans are out to enrich themselves.
The corrupt democrats are waging a war.
When you're assaulting Congress and arresting judges, you are waging war in a much more literal way than most of what the Democrats are doing. And I don't like most of what the Democrats are doing.

Keep hating illegals and liberals more than you love the Constitution, and pretty soon you're not going to have a Constitution.
So judges who break the law shouldn't be arrested like the rest of us?

So much for your "rule of law".
I'm not sure she did break the law. She will likely argue that a judge's chambers aren't public property for purposes of an administrative warrant.

At the very least, an administration that wasn't trying to intimidate judges, lawyers, and witnesses wouldn't have handled her arrest in this way.
Of course you aren't sure she broke the law, you aren't honest enough to admit she got caught so you hide behind, "well I personally didn't see the evidence therefor I can't really say..." but if it were Trump or those scary unarmed January Sixers you would break your hands typing out condemnation as fast as your little limp wrists could manage.
I don't need to tie myself in knots like you. My position is simple: claim due process wasn't given if I don't like the outcome of the due process they were given.

We have been arresting or suing anyone we don't like, with or without a valid warrant, evidence, or a hearing, and now we hate that American voters have turned the tables on us. Now we claim Trump is saying we should start disappearing US citizens. In your "honest" opinion, is he right?
FIFY for honesty.
More like you fixed it for projection. Trump and his insurrectionist cult are the ones who routinely cry foul when the evidence is against them. That's why he spent the last four years filling your feed pan with all the anti-judge propaganda you could hold.
Well I haven't seen the evidence for myself so I don't know if those judges were honest or not! Isn't that how you say it works? Trump wasn't given Due Process because I didn't see the evidence! Why don't you believe in Due Process, fascist?
Trump was given due process and an awful lot of deference as well. Much more than this judge apparently received.

Trump was given due process in front of kangaroo courts.

For bogus charges, with no evidence, and ignoring his rights including due process. The Left has no legitimate reason to crow on their prosecutions of Trump. They were a gross miscarriage of Justice. If they were serious individuals, they would be embarrassed by the idiocy of it all. But the fascists are arrogant to the extreme and will never admit mistakes.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:



The left says bring them all back to the USA.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ScottS said:

Assassin said:



The left says bring them all back to the USA.
But not to thier neighborhoods
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wage suppression?what do you mean?
Waco1947 ,la
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Wage suppression?what do you mean?
It's like when you have to pass gas really badly, but you're in front of the church in the pulpit. You can't really let go, but you know it's not up to you at some point. Nature takes it's course.

And you realize it wasn't all gas...
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
gtownbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Homan said there were over 700,000 illegals with criminal records that ICE was looking for. Biden and Company truly did let anyone in from anywhere. No background checks. Just come in, sign the sheet, claim asylum and tell use which city you wish us to take you. Oh and your asylum hearing is in three years; wink, wink. And there is no felony in that action?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Wage suppression? what do you mean?
[A surplus of labor will lead to increased competition among job seekers, driving wages down as workers are willing to accept lower pay to secure employment.]

[In a situation of excess supply in the labor market, with many applicants for every job opening, employers will have an incentive to offer lower wages than they otherwise would have. Nurses' salary will move down toward equilibrium.]

Flood any country will migrants and wages will decline or remain stagnant
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:

Waco1947 said:

Wage suppression?what do you mean?
It's like when you have to pass gas really badly, but you're in front of the church in the pulpit. You can't really let go, but you know it's not up to you at some point. Nature takes it's course.

And you realize it wasn't all gas...


An interesting day at church
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ScottS said:

Assassin said:

Waco1947 said:

Wage suppression?what do you mean?
It's like when you have to pass gas really badly, but you're in front of the church in the pulpit. You can't really let go, but you know it's not up to you at some point. Nature takes it's course.

And you realize it wasn't all gas...
An interesting day at church
No sh... kidding!
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:

ScottS said:

Assassin said:



The left says bring them all back to the USA.
But not to thier neighborhoods
No. They live in gated communities with armed guards. The fascist elitists rarely face the consequences of the insane ideas they push on the rest of us.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Waco1947 said:

Wage suppression? what do you mean?
[A surplus of labor will lead to increased competition among job seekers, driving wages down as workers are willing to accept lower pay to secure employment.]

[In a situation of excess supply in the labor market, with many applicants for every job opening, employers will have an incentive to offer lower wages than they otherwise would have. Nurses' salary will move down toward equilibrium.]

Flood any country will migrants and wages will decline or remain stagnant
ECON 101: the law of supply and demand

Everyone should have a basic economic education based upon the Austrian School, not Keynesian or Marxist economics. Unfortunately, too many people are ignorant and what they "know" is based upon Marxist lies.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.