For all intents and purposes, by now Sam lives under a bridge, eats children and avoids sunlight because it would turn him to stone.Assassin said:Stop trying to be funny. "Valid election". Not funny at allSam Lowry said:It's not really about the building.Redbrickbear said:KaiBear said:Not even in the top 100.Osodecentx said:Sam Lowry said:Charged with a felony, i.e. not a misdemeanor.gtownbear said:I refer you Sam to the link below. I will look up some others as the courts threw out some of the cases against January 6 defendants.Sam Lowry said:Those are not facts. Misdemeanor defendants were not held for years or in solitary confinement.gtownbear said:No I am talking about numerous Americans at the Capital on January 6 having all types of incidental charges added to misdemeanors to lengthen their potential sentences or in most cases get them to plead guilty rather than go to trial. And while all this was going on for years, many of them were denied bail so were held in the rotten D.C. jails, some in solitary confinement. So in fact these American Citizens had their civil rights taken away from them during this time due to the abuse of power by Attorney General Merrick Garland. That is what was taking place and many activist judges were culpable in agreeing with the prosecutors who said these folks were a danger to society and should remain in jail until trial even though most had no criminal record.quash said:gtownbear said:I would remind you that the guy you say asked for the violence and pardoned the violent asked for everyone to go "peacefully" to the Capital and protest and make their voices heard. And again numerous protesters on January 6 were arrested and kept in jail, many for periods in solitary confinement, for up to two years without trial and denied bail. They were saved by President Trump's second election and his pardons realizing how many of them were overcharged for misdemeanors while denied rights most are afforded without prior criminal records.quash said:gtownbear said:https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/an-egregious-denial-of-due-process-for-jan-6-protesters/quash said:gtownbear said:
Support for your assertion that Obama deportations were done without due process?
Again, because of the second grade level you're displaying, this is not about one individual.
I would assume he used warrants from Administrative Judges with deportation orders, and other pertinent laws like those caught just entering the country and were allowed to be removed and other means. One thing I am sure of is there were not three million civil trials for all of those Obama removed. The left just never complained because it was a democrat who did the removing rather than President Trump. When the media and the leftist groups whine and complain about an issue constantly in mass, it can bring real focus to something that otherwise would not be there, would you not agree.
As to the constant due process mantra I would ask about the January 6 defendants who the FBI spent an insane amount of time studying tens of thousands of hours of video to hunt down anyone at the Capital that day, and the Justice Department would bundle the infractions to increase jail time to years over minor misdemeanors in many cases. Furthermore, they denied many decent folks their civil rights and "due process" by keeping them in jail for up to two years awaiting trial in the seedy Washington D.C. jails. I don't recall any of you that complain about the unfair treatment of illegals who broke into the United States saying one thing about the unreasonable denial of those January 6 protesters due process rights. And they are American Citizens. Or did I miss it somehow?
The pardoned violent insurrectionists received due process. If it helps I'll give a short layman's version of due process: notice and an opportunity to be heard.
I am absolutely befuddled by your objection to exactly how law enforcement and prosecution works. Hours of investigative work followed by charges. Bundling infractions? Yeah, that's called a charging instrument and such bundling happens on a daily basis in every DA's office in the country.
Nothing biased about this, just a reporter who doesn't understand how our legal system works.
To address just one obvious bull**** claim: Defendant X didn't get most of the 41,000 hours of video. Oh noes.
Defendant X doesn't appear in all of that footage. EZ
Will some get reversals or remands? Probably some. I mean there's a thousand plus.
But we'll never know because the guy that asked for the violence pardoned the violent.
And the corrupt.
Anyone with $/influence/MAGA leanings. Sad!
Are you seriously crying about criminal rights?
Now those are the facts.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/jul/29/john-strand-jan-6-defendant-said-he-endured-four-m/
J 6 was one of the saddest days in American history
Americans attacked our Capitol
Exactly
It's like people forget the Capitol was literally bombed in the 1980s….and of course the British burned the White House and most of DC in the war of 1812.
America bounced right back
If an open, violent attempt to nullify a valid election isn't a sad day for the republic, I don't know what to say. It remains to be seen whether we bounce back.
Federal Judge blocks Trump from deporting illegal alien gang members
213,127 Views |
2534 Replies |
Last: 2 mo ago by Assassin
[ol]Sam Lowry said:Name 100 and put it in perspective for me.EatMoreSalmon said:No one said it wasn't sad. Just that there are sadder moments in our history.Sam Lowry said:It's not really about the building.Redbrickbear said:KaiBear said:Not even in the top 100.Osodecentx said:Sam Lowry said:
Charged with a felony, i.e. not a misdemeanor.
J 6 was one of the saddest days in American history
Americans attacked our Capitol
Exactly
It's like people forget the Capitol was literally bombed in the 1980s….and of course the British burned the White House and most of DC in the war of 1812.
America bounced right back
If an open, violent attempt to nullify a valid election isn't a sad day for the republic, I don't know what to say. It remains to be seen whether we bounce back.
Facebook Groups at; Memories of Dallas, Mem of Texas, Mem of Football in Texas, Mem Texas Music and Through a Texas Lens. Come visit! Over 100,000 members and 100,000 regular visitors
[ol]
Pentagon Discharges Troops for Refusing Vaccine (February 2, 2022): After refusing to comply with Sec. Austin's COVID-19 vaccine mandate, 3,000 troops are forced out by the U.S. Army. The involuntary separations coincided with record recruitment shortfalls, followed congressional concerns about inadequate accommodations to service members, and is estimated to cost millions to recruit and train new service members. No U.S. government employees have been fired for the Afghanistan withdrawal. Issuing Waivers for Rosatom Nuclear Projects (February 4, 2022): Reversing a Trump Administration decision, the State Department issued sanctions relief for Iran's nuclear activities in an effort to salvage the JCPOA. The move allowed foreign countries and companies to engage in Iran's nuclear sector without facing U.S. penalties and greenlighted construction of two nuclear reactors in Iran by Russian state-owned Rosatom in a $10 billion contract. Biden Administration Fails to Deter Russian Invasion of Ukraine (February 24, 2022): After withholding military aid, refusing to sanction Nord Stream 2, and signaling that a "minor incursion" would face limited blowback, and countless diplomatic overtures to Moscow, Russia launches its war against Ukraine, invading the eastern territories of Donetsk and Luhansk before marching on Kyiv. President Biden has failed at one of his most important tasks as commander-in-chief since 1945: preventing wars of conquest on the European continent. Zelensky Spurns Biden Administration's Evacuation Offer (February 26, 2022): After U.S. officials asked President Zelensky to evacuate Kyiv, he turned down the request, reportedly responding: "The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride." The move showed a stark contrast between the courageous spirit of the Ukrainian resistance and the Biden Administration's obsession with retreat. Biden Refuses to Enforce Oil Sanctions on Iran (March 1, 2022): Tanker tracking data reveals that Chinese purchases of Iranian oil have reached record levels, exceeding a previous peak in 2016 when the trade was unsanctioned by the United States. Because of the Biden Administration's refusal to enforce sanctions and continued pursuit of nuclear negotiations, Chinese imports have exceeded 700,000 barrels per day by January. Pentagon Releases Second GITMO Detainee from U.S. Custody (March 7, 2022): The Pentagon announces that the Biden Administration decided to transfer Guantanamo Bay detainee Mohammad Ahmad al-Qahtani, known as the "20th hijacker" for his attempted role in the 9/11 attacks. President Biden ignored concerns that the devout jihadistwho committed his life to killing Americansmay try to resume terrorist activity once released from U.S. custody. Rejecting Poland's Offer of Support (March 9, 2022): The Biden Administration refused Poland's "untenable" proposal to transfer its Russian-made MiG-29 fighter jets to replenish Ukraine's air force against invading Russian forces, claiming it could provoke Russia to fly combat aircraft from NATO territory into the war zone. Incredibly, then-Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said it was "not clear that there is a substantive rationale" for the move while Ukraine defended itself with antiquated Soviet-era weaponry. The U.S. response prompted Zelensky to ask, "What is NATO doing? Is it being run by Russia?" Denying Ukraine Patriot Air Defense System (March 10, 2022): After Russia bombs a maternity hospital killing hundreds of civilians, the White House refused to send the advanced Patriot air-defense system to Ukraine, claiming it would require U.S. forces to enter Ukraine to operate ita move that could provoke Russia. The Patriot air-defense system is the only such operational system that can shoot down attacking missiles. However, after nine months of refusing to send Patriot missile defense systems to Ukraine, the Biden Administration agreed to send one on December 21, 2022, as Russia carries out a relentless airstrike campaign on Ukraine's civilian infrastructure and electrical grid. The air defense system will not be operable until the following spring, allowing Putin to destroy schools, homes, hospitals and critical infrastructure in the interim. Divulging U.S. Calculus to Russia (March 11, 2022): After vowing in his SOTU that he would not send U.S. troops to Ukraine, President Biden ruled out enforcing a no-fly zone over Ukraine and announced to the world that "we will not fight the third World War in Ukraine." Biden's unnecessary public messaging further signaled the Biden Administration's deep fear of military escalation. Trying to Lift the FTO Designation on the IRGC (March 21, 2022): The Biden Administration almost delisted the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a Foreign Terrorist Organization during talks to revive the JCPOA. The move would have been an extraordinary and unprecedented measure given that the Guard has killed hundreds of Americans while the Quds Force supports terrorist proxy forces throughout the region. However, after a bipartisan super-majority of Senators expressed firm opposition to the measure via a Motion to Instruct offered by Sen. James Lankford, the White House backed off the plan. Delaying MLRS and Restricting their Range (May 31, 2022): After refusing to give Kyiv Multiple Rocket Launch Systems (MLRS) due to fears that striking Russian territory would be "provocative," President Biden finally acquiesced to conservative pressure and approved the requeston the condition Ukraine promised not to fire them in Russia. WWIII does not break out. Waiting to Send Harpoon Anti-Ship Missiles (June 15, 2022): After extensive Ukrainian and conservative pressure, President Biden finally agreed to send Harpoon anti-ship missiles, which will take several months to reach Ukraine. The slow pace of weapons deliveries helped Russian forces achieve naval access and apply heavy pressure in the eastern Donbas region. WWIII does not break out. Biden Grovels for Saudi Oil ProductionAnd Fails (July 15, 2022): After pledging to turn Saudi Arabia into a "pariah" on the campaign trail, President Biden sparked a global backlash by fist-bumping Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, who approved the 2018 assassination of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi. The awkward attempt to mend relations with Riyadh came as the White House was desperate for KSA's help in addressing surging oil prices before the midterms but refused to unleash domestic production and America's hundreds of barrels of untapped oil. White House Discourages Pelosi from Visiting Taiwan (August 3, 2022): After Xi Jinping told President Biden not to allow Pelosi to travel to Taipei and that "those who play with fire will perish by it," the White House discouraged her from visiting the island to avoid "provoking" the CCP. To her credit, Speaker Pelosi moved forward with the trip and reaffirmed "America's unshakeable commitment to our allies and friends in the region." The Biden Administration meddling in the CODEL was a further signal of its sensitivity to Beijing's rhetorical resolve. Denies Ukraine's Long-Range Missile Request (September 16, 2022): The Biden Administration holds off Kyiv's request for more long-range missiles (with a range of 190 miles), a critical weapon for success in a wider counteroffensive. President Biden concluded that shipping long-range guided missiles, which would give Ukraine new options for striking Crimea, would be viewed as a "major provocation" by Moscow and was thus not worth the risk. Muddling U.S. Policy on Taiwan (September 19, 2022): Now for the fourth time in just over a year, President Biden publicly asserts that American forces would defend Taipei against a PLA invasiona clear departure from strategic ambiguity. The statement is once again walked back by White House officials, who insist there is no change in U.S. policy. The comment renews public confusion about the Biden Administration's stance. Engaging in Public Hand-Wringing on Nuclear War (October 6, 2022): President Biden backtracked on comments he made on days earlier warning we faced the "prospect of Armageddon" for the first time since the Cuban missile crisis. After publicly airing his fears of nuclear war, he told Democratic donors, "I don't think [Putin] will" use nuclear weapons in Ukraine. The comments, offered at a private event, surprised even his own senior advisors who did not anticipate him offering his stream of consciousness on nuclear war at a partisan fundraiser. The comments earned major blowback for giving indications of how Moscow's nuclear saber-rattling was influencing the American calculus in Ukraine. Biden Stalls Advance Air-Defense Systems (October 11, 2022): After Kyiv pleaded for more air-defense weapons for weeks and Russian troops switched to more brutal and indiscriminate tactics under General Sergey Surovikin, President Biden finally agreed to conservative pressure and agrees to supply Ukraine advanced air-defense systems. The systems will take months to arrive, preventing the interception of incoming missiles until then. WWIII does not break out. Biden National Security Strategy Misses the Mark (October 12, 2022): Almost two years after entering office, the Biden Administration finally released its NSS, receiving considerable pushback for its extensive focus on amorphous global challenges like climate change and COVID-19 rather than concrete security threats like Iran's nuclear program. Most disturbingly, the strategy's publication was delayed after Russia's invasion of Ukrainean indication that Moscow was not identified as a major U.S. threat in the original draft, an indictment of its lack of foresight. Furthermore, the rhetoric of the NSS does not align with the funding needs of the U.S. defense apparatus. Treasury Lifts Venezuela Sanctions on Oil Giant (November 26, 2022): After Saudi and Emirati leaders refused to answer President Biden's calls, the Biden Administration turned to Plan B: lifting U.S. sanctions and allowing Chevron to expand Venezuelan oil production and exports. The move followed Maduro's agreement to restart Mexico City talks with then-opposition leader Juan Guaido but is clearly designed to ease U.S. gas prices, a political burden for the White House. Abrams Tank Debacle (January 23-25, 2023): Almost a year into the war, the Pentagon is still arguing against sending tanks, arguing they won't get there in time and that training on the tanks takes months. Two days later, the White House reversed its position in light of German and conservative pressure. Chancellor Scholz had offered to send Leopard 2 tanks to Ukraine if Washington sent Ukraine the M1 Abrams. The first tanks do not arrive until September. WWIII does not break out. Biden Prematurely Claims Victory Over Russian Economy (December 31, 2022): In Warsaw, President Biden claimed earlier that year that U.S. sanctions reduced the ruble "to rubble" and that Russia's economy would be cut in half within years. However, the ruble's price against the dollar has rallied close to pre-invasion levels, and the Russian economy only shrunk by 2.2 percent in 2022 and IMF predictions suggest future growth. The dissonance between his declarations and the trendlines underscore the consequences of the Biden Administration's refusal to enact thousands of sanctions on Russian exports and banks, crack down on sanctions evasion, and allowance of Russia to earn billions in oil and gas revenue through 2022. Allowing China's Spy Balloon to Traverse America (January 28 - February 4, 2023): For a full week, President Biden allowed a high-altitude CCP surveillance balloon to fly across the entire continental United States, letting Beijing violate our airspace with impunity and gather intelligence on our military basesa move even rebuked by Democrats in Congress. The White House first denied the balloon's existence before ensuring it had enough time to reach the eastern coastline. As if attempting to provide cover for the CCP, President Biden later reflected that the balloon was "more embarrassing than it was intentional." Sec. Blinken has stated that the "chapter should be closed" as long as it doesn't happen again. Blinken Tells Staff to Back Down on China Measures (February 6, 2023): According to State Department officials, Sec. Blinken directed his team to back down on issuing human rights-related sanctions, exports controls, and other actions in response to China's spy balloon incursionrather than hold Beijing to accountto de-escalate tensions with the CCP. Refuses Long-Range ATACMSAgain (February 13, 2023): The Biden Administration told Ukrainian officials that they wouldn't share long-range ATACMS missiles because the U.S. military had few to sparedespite having nearly a whole year of war to increase production. This is a new excuse from six months prior, when the justification was that the use of ATACMS would provoke Putin. On September 22, 2023, after refusing to send the short-range ballistic missiles for over a yearincluding prior to Kyiv's 2022 counter- offensivePresident Biden finally bowed to conservative pressure and informed Zelenskyy that Washington would provide Ukraine with a few medium-range missiles but denied long-range missiles with a 190-mile range. WWIII does not break out. Biden Rules out F-16s for Ukraine (February 24, 2023): As Zelensky continues to make public please for the planes a year into the war, President Biden declared that Ukraine "doesn't need F-16s now," with Pentagon allies affirmed that it would require at least 18 months to learn how to fly and maintain them in combat. President Biden eventually reversed course under conservative pressure on May 19, 2023, but U.S. training delays prevented their deployment. WWIII does not break out. White House Proposes 3% Real Cut to Military Funding (March 9, 2023): In its FY24 budget request, the Biden Administration called for a defense spending "increase" that did not even adjust for year-on-year inflation and pay raises, which would put U.S. military spending at its lowest level since the Second World War as a share of the economy and cut the Pentagon's buying power. The PBR's paltry $9.1 billion request for the DOD Pacific Deterrence Initiative also ignored the assessment of the combatant command in charge of the Indo-Pacific region, which indicated $15.4 billion was needed in FY24 to address the threat of China. Droning a Shepherd in Syria (May 3, 2023): Despite the Biden Administration's pledge to curb unintentional casualties, a U.S. drone strike tragically killed a 56-year-old shepherd after confusing him for a senior al-Qaeda leader. Lotfi Hassan Misto was tending to his animals in a rural town in northwestern Syria when U.S. forces fired a Hellfire missile into the rocky outcrop behind his home, killing him and his sheep. The military review of the CENTCOM incident stated that the botched drone strike was the result of "confirmation bias and insufficient red teaming." Biden "Brit-Bashes" London After Belfast Visit (May 10, 2023): After visiting Northern Ireland to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the Good Friday Agreement, President Biden remarked at a Democratic Party fundraiser in New York that he visited Northern Ireland "to make sure the Brits didn't screw around." The blunt remarks drew fire from Democratic Unionists in Northern Ireland and officials in London. Outpaced by European Allies (May 11, 2023): Even as Britain announces it is providing Storm Shadow missiles to give Ukraine more deep-strike capability, the Biden administration still refuses to transfer ATACMS due to perceived risks of escalation and supposed supply limitations. State Department Downplays Tiananmen Square Anniversary (June 4, 2023): Despite pledging to put human rights at the center of its foreign policy, the Biden State Department sent diplomats to China on the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square Massacre, when the PRC sent tanks to brutally repress peaceful pro-democracy protesters and civilians. It also reduced the normal three paragraph annual memorial statement to a single paragraph. White House Denies Chinese Spy Base Report (June 8, 2023): After The Wall Street Journal reported that Beijing has installed a spy base just miles off the coast of Florida in neighboring Cuba, NSC Spokesman John Kirby described the story as "inaccurate." Two days later, the White House admitted the story's veracity; one Biden official even stated the threat has been addressed through "diplomacy" and the PRC has been "slowed down." Biden Administration Greenlights Chinese Cigarettes (June 10, 2023): The FDA allowed Chinese-manufactured illegal e-cigarettes to remain on the market and easily accessible in American liquor and convenience stores despite China's continuous manufacturing of fentanyl precursor chemicals and its smuggling across the Southern Border. In 2022 alone, DEA seized more than 58 million fentanyl-laced pills and 13,000 pounds of fentanyl powder," more than enough to kill everyone in the United States and most of it manufactured in China Sec. Blinken Visits China (June 18, 2023): On the heels of the espionage balloon incident, revelations of a CCP spy base in Cuba, and reports that PLA hackers were hiding malicious computer code inside U.S. military base networks, Sec. Blinken spent eleven hours in talks with Beijing officials. The trip did not lead to accountability for China's export of fentanyl precursor chemicals, a resumption of military-to-military dialogue, or commitments to address China's economic coercion, IP theft, and other destabilizing trade activities. The Biden Administration may even have declined to release the results of the FBI's probe on the Chinese military-surveillance balloon to secure a meeting. Beijing Gaslights Blinken on Fentanyl Cooperation (June 19, 2023): After Sec. Blinken left China, he told reports the two countries agreed to set up "a working group or joint effort" to combat fentanyl trafficking. But just days after the visit, China lashed out at America for its "chronic problem of drug abuse" and made clear it had no intention of cooperating with the State Department in the near future. Top Iran Negotiator Investigated by FBI (June 29, 2023): Rob Malley, President Biden's former special envoy to Iran, was placed on unpaid leave for allegedly mishandling classified materials and divulging national secrets to foreign nationalsmatters under FBI investigation. Malley's past statements that Hamas must be understood as a "charity organization and social branch"which have recently resurfaced have also raised alarm. Meanwhile, the Blinken State Department continues to prevaricate about the incident when confronted by lawmakers. Blocking Timetable for Ukraine's Accession to NATO (July 12, 2023): At the Vilnius Summit, President Biden prevented allies from offering Kyiv a clear path to membership in the Alliance, continuing needless ambiguity about Ukraine's status in an effort to avoid provoking Russia. State Department Refuses to Blame China for Clear Hack (July 20, 2023): A cyber-espionage attack successfully accessed the email accounts of Commerce Sec. Gina Raimondo, U.S. Ambassador Nicholas Burns, and senior Biden Administration officials working on East Asian and Pacific affairs such as Daniel Kritenbrink. Weeks later, it was revealed that the Chinese hackers stole 60,000 State Department emails, which may have contained significant sensitive information. But the Biden Administration refused to formally blame China for the hack despite Microsoft's assessment linking it to a Chinese hacking group. Treasury Announces Weak Investment Restrictions (August 9, 2023): Biden's Treasury Department announced long-awaited restrictions on outbound U.S. investment in certain Chinese companiesexcept the measures are ridden with loopholes, ignore the dual-use nature of important technologies, and fail to include critical industries for Beijing. By the Treasury Department's own admission, the executive order was a "narrowly targeted action." Paying Ransom to Tehran (September 11, 2023): The Biden Administration gave the Iranian regime a massive $6 billion windfall by releasing frozen assets in exchange for the release of five Americans. The movedone in direct violation of the United States' longstanding no-concessions policywas made just weeks before Hamas's brutal invasion of Israel and months before the IRGC launched 350 missiles and drones at Israel. Despite assurances the funds would only be expended for "humanitarian purposes," they are clearly being used to benefit Iran's terrorist proxies, proliferation program, and the Russian military machine killing Ukrainians every day. Jake Sullivan Touts "Quieter" Middle East Before Oct. 7 (September 29, 2023): Just days before Hamas' brutal October 7 attack on Israel, National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan boasted the Middle East "is quieter today than it has been in two decades." The statement revealed a spectacular lack of foresight into how the Biden Administration's funding of Palestinian terror and Iranian proxies would set the conditions for a disastrous conflict and underscored how out of touch President Biden's national security team is with events on the ground. In 2024, the region has been at its most dangerous since at least 1973. Creating Conditions for Hamas' Unprecedented Attack (October 7, 2023): After providing Tehran with billions in sanctions relief, chasing an elusive JCPOA return for two and half years, and refusing to forcefully defend U.S. troops against dozens of attacks by Iranian proxies, Hamasanother Iranian proxykilled more than 30 Americans during the October 7 terrorist attacks. Five are still being held as hostages in Gaza. These acts of appeasement helped set the conditions for the war's outbreak and undermined deterrence. Allowing Iran to Attack U.S. Forces with Impunity (October 17, 2023): Despite Iran's partners in terror carrying out over 170 attacks on U.S. military bases and assets in Syria, Iraq, and Jordan in response to U.S. support for Israel against Hamas, President Biden has only responded with four true retaliatory counterattacks. This permissive approach has emboldened attacks on our service members in the region. Lifting Sanctions on Maduro's Venezuela (October 18, 2023): Squandering financial leverage, Biden's Treasury Department eased oil, gas, and gold sanctions against Caracas and issued a general license authorizing U.S. companies to engage in the government-controlled energy sector. Predictably, Maduro responded by breaking promises on democratic progress and barring opposition candidates for July's sham election. Democrats Clean Up San Francisco to Impress Xi (November 10, 2023): Ahead of President Biden's summit with Xi Jinping in San Francisco, Democrat authorities raced to remove the city's homeless camps and clean up the city's streets with power-washing and scrubbing. Gov. Newsom confirmed the reason for the move: "I know folks are saying, 'Oh, they're just cleaning up this place because all those fancy leaders are coming to town' […] That's true." The beautification effort baffled many San Francisco residents, who expressed dismay that the city would only address public works to welcome an authoritarian leader rather than to care for ordinary Americans. Defense Secretary Austin Goes MIA (January 1-15, 2024): Without disclosing his whereabouts to President Biden, Congress, the NSC, or even his deputy, Sec. Austin disappears for several days while Iran-backed militias strike U.S. bases and Navy assets in the Persian Gulf. Vacationing in Puerto Rico, Deputy Sec. Hicks is notified she will assume his authority. After public alarm, the Pentagon reveals Austin is hospitalized but chose to maintain his "personal privacy." He refuses to resign for the gross misconduct. Biden Administration Bans LNG Exports (January 26, 2024): In a transparently political effort to win over progressive environmentalists, the White House announces a ban on the export of liquified natural gasa move it frames as advancing the renewable energy transition and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. However, the move undercuts Western allies seeking to reduce their reliance on Russian gas by cutting stable U.S. supply. Reversing Pompeo Doctrine on Israeli Settlements (February 23, 2024): Sec. Blinken reversed U.S. policy by concluding that Israeli settlement expansion in the West Bank is "inconsistent with international law" and "counterproductive to achieving enduring peace." The move marked a return to Sec. Kerry's policy, which affirmed the supposed illegality of settlements rather than merely indicating that unrestrained settlement activity could be an obstacle to peace. Biden's FY2025 Budget Cuts Defense BudgetAgain (March 11, 2024): President Biden's requested military budget for this fiscal year proposed a real 10 percent cut from the level authorized by Congress in FY2024 once adjusting for inflation. The move to cut the Pentagon's buying power reflects wishful thinking that America can keep pace with evolving threats without giving our defense apparatus the funding to do so. Abstaining at the UN (March 25, 2024): Caving to international pressure, UN Amb. Thomas-Greenfield refuses to veto UNSC resolution 2728, allowing its passage. The resolution, which called for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, did not even include language condemning Hamas for its October 7 massacre or tying a ceasefire to the release of hostagesa prior U.S. demand. Biden's "Both Sides" Moment on Antisemitic Protests (April 22, 2024): When asked to condemn antisemitic protests on college campuses, President Biden said "I condemn the antisemitic protests […] I also condemn those who don't understand what's going on with the Palestinians." The comments generated widespread outrage for his inability to condemn anti-Jewish activism without caveat. He subsequently refused to deploy the National Guard to protect Jewish students and break up Columbia University's anti-Israel encampments, or take any other meaningful action to restore order at American universities. Losing Status-of-Forces Agreements (April 25, 2024): In a blow to U.S. counterterrorism operations in Africa, the Pentagon announced the majority of U.S. troops would be extracted from Chad and Niger, which have been vital to U.S. efforts across the Sahel. The setbacks have raised concerns that the reduced footprint will allow the spread of jihadi violence south of the Sahara, where Al-Shabaab and Boko Haram remain active and local groups have pledged allegiance to Al Qaeda and the Islamic State. The developments also coincide with rising ties between Wagner mercenaries and Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso and Russian efforts to fill the U.S. security vacuum. Cutting Off Precision Munitions to Israel (May 9, 2024): The Biden Administration announced it would halt shipments of bombs and artillery shells to Israel if the IDF moved into Rafah to eliminate Hamas and achieve military objectives. The decisionpredicated on concerns the operation would lead to major civilian casualtiesironically increased the odds civilians would be killed by cutting off the supply of precision munitions, which provide greater accuracy. These restrictions undercut Israel's ability to defend itself and marked an unprecedented betrayal of a close ally. Trying to Release GTMO Detainees Before Hamas Attack (May 20, 2024): News surfaces that the Biden Administration attempted to release 11 GTMO detainees from U.S. custody to the Middle East prior to the Oct. 7 attack, but abruptly halted the move due to political optics. The move defied Pentagon and ODNI data pointing to risks of recidivism: Almost a fifth of current or former detainees re-engaged in terrorism after transfer or release. Letting Havana Officials Tour Miami Airport TSA Facilities (May 20, 2024): On Cuban Independence Day, the Biden State Department welcomed five Havana officials with a tour of TSA facilities at Miami International Airport, giving them access to secure areas for five hours. They inspected a TSA checkpoint and baggage screening area. The move was widely condemned as reckless for inviting a state sponsor of terrorism into secure facilities at one of the busiest airports in America. Biden Administration Presses Europe Not to Rebuke Iran (May 27, 2024): Despite Tehran's advances in its nuclear program and expanded stockpile of near-weapons-grade fissile material to a record level, the Biden Administration reportedly urged Britain and France to avoid censuring Iran at the IAEA member-state board. European diplomats warned that approach would undercut the IAEA's authority and weaken the credibility of Western pressure on Iran. Building the Gaza Floating Pier (May 28, 2024): During his State of the Union address, President Biden announced the initiative to build a facility offshore of the Gaza Strip for delivering humanitarian aid via maritime cargo. However, the pier promptly collapsed after heavy seas and the operation received criticism as a PR stunt that cost $320 million. The project also ignored the advice of many military experts who indicated that such piers were not designed to operate in turbulent weather as well as concerns that humanitarian aid shipments would not reach Palestinians and be diverted by Hamas. Whipping Against ICC Sanctions (June 4, 2024): After Karim Khanthe International Criminal Court (ICC)'s prosecutorissued outrageous arrest warrants against Prime Minister Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for supposed war crimes, the Biden White House urged House Democrats to oppose bipartisan legislation imposing sanctions on the ICC. While many progressives defied the Biden Administration's efforts to shield the ICC, the episode demonstrated President Biden's unwillingness to confront anti-Israel lawfare in anti-Semitic kangaroo courts like the ICC. Obama's election and the subsequent BLM wars Obamacare's war on our healthcare system [/ol]
Facebook Groups at; Memories of Dallas, Mem of Texas, Mem of Football in Texas, Mem Texas Music and Through a Texas Lens. Come visit! Over 100,000 members and 100,000 regular visitors
Each day our country was run by an unknown, unelected person or persons during the Biden administration. That's at least one hundred.Sam Lowry said:Name 100 and put it in perspective for me.EatMoreSalmon said:No one said it wasn't sad. Just that there are sadder moments in our history.Sam Lowry said:It's not really about the building.Redbrickbear said:KaiBear said:Not even in the top 100.Osodecentx said:Sam Lowry said:Charged with a felony, i.e. not a misdemeanor.gtownbear said:I refer you Sam to the link below. I will look up some others as the courts threw out some of the cases against January 6 defendants.Sam Lowry said:Those are not facts. Misdemeanor defendants were not held for years or in solitary confinement.gtownbear said:No I am talking about numerous Americans at the Capital on January 6 having all types of incidental charges added to misdemeanors to lengthen their potential sentences or in most cases get them to plead guilty rather than go to trial. And while all this was going on for years, many of them were denied bail so were held in the rotten D.C. jails, some in solitary confinement. So in fact these American Citizens had their civil rights taken away from them during this time due to the abuse of power by Attorney General Merrick Garland. That is what was taking place and many activist judges were culpable in agreeing with the prosecutors who said these folks were a danger to society and should remain in jail until trial even though most had no criminal record.quash said:gtownbear said:I would remind you that the guy you say asked for the violence and pardoned the violent asked for everyone to go "peacefully" to the Capital and protest and make their voices heard. And again numerous protesters on January 6 were arrested and kept in jail, many for periods in solitary confinement, for up to two years without trial and denied bail. They were saved by President Trump's second election and his pardons realizing how many of them were overcharged for misdemeanors while denied rights most are afforded without prior criminal records.quash said:gtownbear said:https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/an-egregious-denial-of-due-process-for-jan-6-protesters/quash said:gtownbear said:
Support for your assertion that Obama deportations were done without due process?
Again, because of the second grade level you're displaying, this is not about one individual.
I would assume he used warrants from Administrative Judges with deportation orders, and other pertinent laws like those caught just entering the country and were allowed to be removed and other means. One thing I am sure of is there were not three million civil trials for all of those Obama removed. The left just never complained because it was a democrat who did the removing rather than President Trump. When the media and the leftist groups whine and complain about an issue constantly in mass, it can bring real focus to something that otherwise would not be there, would you not agree.
As to the constant due process mantra I would ask about the January 6 defendants who the FBI spent an insane amount of time studying tens of thousands of hours of video to hunt down anyone at the Capital that day, and the Justice Department would bundle the infractions to increase jail time to years over minor misdemeanors in many cases. Furthermore, they denied many decent folks their civil rights and "due process" by keeping them in jail for up to two years awaiting trial in the seedy Washington D.C. jails. I don't recall any of you that complain about the unfair treatment of illegals who broke into the United States saying one thing about the unreasonable denial of those January 6 protesters due process rights. And they are American Citizens. Or did I miss it somehow?
The pardoned violent insurrectionists received due process. If it helps I'll give a short layman's version of due process: notice and an opportunity to be heard.
I am absolutely befuddled by your objection to exactly how law enforcement and prosecution works. Hours of investigative work followed by charges. Bundling infractions? Yeah, that's called a charging instrument and such bundling happens on a daily basis in every DA's office in the country.
Nothing biased about this, just a reporter who doesn't understand how our legal system works.
To address just one obvious bull**** claim: Defendant X didn't get most of the 41,000 hours of video. Oh noes.
Defendant X doesn't appear in all of that footage. EZ
Will some get reversals or remands? Probably some. I mean there's a thousand plus.
But we'll never know because the guy that asked for the violence pardoned the violent.
And the corrupt.
Anyone with $/influence/MAGA leanings. Sad!
Are you seriously crying about criminal rights?
Now those are the facts.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/jul/29/john-strand-jan-6-defendant-said-he-endured-four-m/
J 6 was one of the saddest days in American history
Americans attacked our Capitol
Exactly
It's like people forget the Capitol was literally bombed in the 1980s….and of course the British burned the White House and most of DC in the war of 1812.
America bounced right back
If an open, violent attempt to nullify a valid election isn't a sad day for the republic, I don't know what to say. It remains to be seen whether we bounce back.
Actually the actions on January 6 might have prevented evidence of wrongdoing from coming forward in congress as at least one state had representatives and a senator who challenged the electors for Alabama if I am not mistaken. The procedures for this are set forth in the Constitution. In fact, the democrats have challenged electors on previous occasions, but they lacked the vote of a senator which is required to proceed with the presentation of evidence on both sides.Sam Lowry said:It's not really about the building.Redbrickbear said:KaiBear said:Not even in the top 100.Osodecentx said:Sam Lowry said:Charged with a felony, i.e. not a misdemeanor.gtownbear said:I refer you Sam to the link below. I will look up some others as the courts threw out some of the cases against January 6 defendants.Sam Lowry said:Those are not facts. Misdemeanor defendants were not held for years or in solitary confinement.gtownbear said:No I am talking about numerous Americans at the Capital on January 6 having all types of incidental charges added to misdemeanors to lengthen their potential sentences or in most cases get them to plead guilty rather than go to trial. And while all this was going on for years, many of them were denied bail so were held in the rotten D.C. jails, some in solitary confinement. So in fact these American Citizens had their civil rights taken away from them during this time due to the abuse of power by Attorney General Merrick Garland. That is what was taking place and many activist judges were culpable in agreeing with the prosecutors who said these folks were a danger to society and should remain in jail until trial even though most had no criminal record.quash said:gtownbear said:I would remind you that the guy you say asked for the violence and pardoned the violent asked for everyone to go "peacefully" to the Capital and protest and make their voices heard. And again numerous protesters on January 6 were arrested and kept in jail, many for periods in solitary confinement, for up to two years without trial and denied bail. They were saved by President Trump's second election and his pardons realizing how many of them were overcharged for misdemeanors while denied rights most are afforded without prior criminal records.quash said:gtownbear said:https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/an-egregious-denial-of-due-process-for-jan-6-protesters/quash said:gtownbear said:
Support for your assertion that Obama deportations were done without due process?
Again, because of the second grade level you're displaying, this is not about one individual.
I would assume he used warrants from Administrative Judges with deportation orders, and other pertinent laws like those caught just entering the country and were allowed to be removed and other means. One thing I am sure of is there were not three million civil trials for all of those Obama removed. The left just never complained because it was a democrat who did the removing rather than President Trump. When the media and the leftist groups whine and complain about an issue constantly in mass, it can bring real focus to something that otherwise would not be there, would you not agree.
As to the constant due process mantra I would ask about the January 6 defendants who the FBI spent an insane amount of time studying tens of thousands of hours of video to hunt down anyone at the Capital that day, and the Justice Department would bundle the infractions to increase jail time to years over minor misdemeanors in many cases. Furthermore, they denied many decent folks their civil rights and "due process" by keeping them in jail for up to two years awaiting trial in the seedy Washington D.C. jails. I don't recall any of you that complain about the unfair treatment of illegals who broke into the United States saying one thing about the unreasonable denial of those January 6 protesters due process rights. And they are American Citizens. Or did I miss it somehow?
The pardoned violent insurrectionists received due process. If it helps I'll give a short layman's version of due process: notice and an opportunity to be heard.
I am absolutely befuddled by your objection to exactly how law enforcement and prosecution works. Hours of investigative work followed by charges. Bundling infractions? Yeah, that's called a charging instrument and such bundling happens on a daily basis in every DA's office in the country.
Nothing biased about this, just a reporter who doesn't understand how our legal system works.
To address just one obvious bull**** claim: Defendant X didn't get most of the 41,000 hours of video. Oh noes.
Defendant X doesn't appear in all of that footage. EZ
Will some get reversals or remands? Probably some. I mean there's a thousand plus.
But we'll never know because the guy that asked for the violence pardoned the violent.
And the corrupt.
Anyone with $/influence/MAGA leanings. Sad!
Are you seriously crying about criminal rights?
Now those are the facts.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/jul/29/john-strand-jan-6-defendant-said-he-endured-four-m/
J 6 was one of the saddest days in American history
Americans attacked our Capitol
Exactly
It's like people forget the Capitol was literally bombed in the 1980s….and of course the British burned the White House and most of DC in the war of 1812.
America bounced right back
If an open, violent attempt to nullify a valid election isn't a sad day for the republic, I don't know what to say. It remains to be seen whether we bounce back.
I have my suspicions about that Presidential Election in 2020, as do many other Americans. Just the fact that Joe Biden, hiding in his home for most of the campaign supposedly got many more votes than Obama when he ran for President with his popularity is almost impossible to believe. And Kamala got several million less than Biden when she ran in 2024. Something seems amiss to me. Plus many states and big cities reported weird voter irregularities. Funny thing the courts mostly ruled no one had standing to bring the cases so no evidence ever saw the light of day.
But those illegals who broke in and are criminals have standing before they are deported, even though they are not even American citizens. Is this a great country or what.
That explains a lot.
It's no different now, except that Trump's people are even less qualified.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:Each day our country was run by an unknown, unelected person or persons during the Biden administration. That's at least one hundred.Sam Lowry said:Name 100 and put it in perspective for me.EatMoreSalmon said:No one said it wasn't sad. Just that there are sadder moments in our history.Sam Lowry said:It's not really about the building.Redbrickbear said:KaiBear said:Not even in the top 100.Osodecentx said:Sam Lowry said:Charged with a felony, i.e. not a misdemeanor.gtownbear said:I refer you Sam to the link below. I will look up some others as the courts threw out some of the cases against January 6 defendants.Sam Lowry said:Those are not facts. Misdemeanor defendants were not held for years or in solitary confinement.gtownbear said:No I am talking about numerous Americans at the Capital on January 6 having all types of incidental charges added to misdemeanors to lengthen their potential sentences or in most cases get them to plead guilty rather than go to trial. And while all this was going on for years, many of them were denied bail so were held in the rotten D.C. jails, some in solitary confinement. So in fact these American Citizens had their civil rights taken away from them during this time due to the abuse of power by Attorney General Merrick Garland. That is what was taking place and many activist judges were culpable in agreeing with the prosecutors who said these folks were a danger to society and should remain in jail until trial even though most had no criminal record.quash said:gtownbear said:I would remind you that the guy you say asked for the violence and pardoned the violent asked for everyone to go "peacefully" to the Capital and protest and make their voices heard. And again numerous protesters on January 6 were arrested and kept in jail, many for periods in solitary confinement, for up to two years without trial and denied bail. They were saved by President Trump's second election and his pardons realizing how many of them were overcharged for misdemeanors while denied rights most are afforded without prior criminal records.quash said:gtownbear said:https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/an-egregious-denial-of-due-process-for-jan-6-protesters/quash said:gtownbear said:
Support for your assertion that Obama deportations were done without due process?
Again, because of the second grade level you're displaying, this is not about one individual.
I would assume he used warrants from Administrative Judges with deportation orders, and other pertinent laws like those caught just entering the country and were allowed to be removed and other means. One thing I am sure of is there were not three million civil trials for all of those Obama removed. The left just never complained because it was a democrat who did the removing rather than President Trump. When the media and the leftist groups whine and complain about an issue constantly in mass, it can bring real focus to something that otherwise would not be there, would you not agree.
As to the constant due process mantra I would ask about the January 6 defendants who the FBI spent an insane amount of time studying tens of thousands of hours of video to hunt down anyone at the Capital that day, and the Justice Department would bundle the infractions to increase jail time to years over minor misdemeanors in many cases. Furthermore, they denied many decent folks their civil rights and "due process" by keeping them in jail for up to two years awaiting trial in the seedy Washington D.C. jails. I don't recall any of you that complain about the unfair treatment of illegals who broke into the United States saying one thing about the unreasonable denial of those January 6 protesters due process rights. And they are American Citizens. Or did I miss it somehow?
The pardoned violent insurrectionists received due process. If it helps I'll give a short layman's version of due process: notice and an opportunity to be heard.
I am absolutely befuddled by your objection to exactly how law enforcement and prosecution works. Hours of investigative work followed by charges. Bundling infractions? Yeah, that's called a charging instrument and such bundling happens on a daily basis in every DA's office in the country.
Nothing biased about this, just a reporter who doesn't understand how our legal system works.
To address just one obvious bull**** claim: Defendant X didn't get most of the 41,000 hours of video. Oh noes.
Defendant X doesn't appear in all of that footage. EZ
Will some get reversals or remands? Probably some. I mean there's a thousand plus.
But we'll never know because the guy that asked for the violence pardoned the violent.
And the corrupt.
Anyone with $/influence/MAGA leanings. Sad!
Are you seriously crying about criminal rights?
Now those are the facts.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/jul/29/john-strand-jan-6-defendant-said-he-endured-four-m/
J 6 was one of the saddest days in American history
Americans attacked our Capitol
Exactly
It's like people forget the Capitol was literally bombed in the 1980s….and of course the British burned the White House and most of DC in the war of 1812.
America bounced right back
If an open, violent attempt to nullify a valid election isn't a sad day for the republic, I don't know what to say. It remains to be seen whether we bounce back.
Completely false.gtownbear said:Funny thing the courts mostly ruled no one had standing to bring the cases so no evidence ever saw the light of day.Sam Lowry said:It's not really about the building.Redbrickbear said:KaiBear said:Not even in the top 100.Osodecentx said:Sam Lowry said:Charged with a felony, i.e. not a misdemeanor.gtownbear said:I refer you Sam to the link below. I will look up some others as the courts threw out some of the cases against January 6 defendants.Sam Lowry said:Those are not facts. Misdemeanor defendants were not held for years or in solitary confinement.gtownbear said:No I am talking about numerous Americans at the Capital on January 6 having all types of incidental charges added to misdemeanors to lengthen their potential sentences or in most cases get them to plead guilty rather than go to trial. And while all this was going on for years, many of them were denied bail so were held in the rotten D.C. jails, some in solitary confinement. So in fact these American Citizens had their civil rights taken away from them during this time due to the abuse of power by Attorney General Merrick Garland. That is what was taking place and many activist judges were culpable in agreeing with the prosecutors who said these folks were a danger to society and should remain in jail until trial even though most had no criminal record.quash said:gtownbear said:I would remind you that the guy you say asked for the violence and pardoned the violent asked for everyone to go "peacefully" to the Capital and protest and make their voices heard. And again numerous protesters on January 6 were arrested and kept in jail, many for periods in solitary confinement, for up to two years without trial and denied bail. They were saved by President Trump's second election and his pardons realizing how many of them were overcharged for misdemeanors while denied rights most are afforded without prior criminal records.quash said:gtownbear said:https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/an-egregious-denial-of-due-process-for-jan-6-protesters/quash said:gtownbear said:
Support for your assertion that Obama deportations were done without due process?
Again, because of the second grade level you're displaying, this is not about one individual.
I would assume he used warrants from Administrative Judges with deportation orders, and other pertinent laws like those caught just entering the country and were allowed to be removed and other means. One thing I am sure of is there were not three million civil trials for all of those Obama removed. The left just never complained because it was a democrat who did the removing rather than President Trump. When the media and the leftist groups whine and complain about an issue constantly in mass, it can bring real focus to something that otherwise would not be there, would you not agree.
As to the constant due process mantra I would ask about the January 6 defendants who the FBI spent an insane amount of time studying tens of thousands of hours of video to hunt down anyone at the Capital that day, and the Justice Department would bundle the infractions to increase jail time to years over minor misdemeanors in many cases. Furthermore, they denied many decent folks their civil rights and "due process" by keeping them in jail for up to two years awaiting trial in the seedy Washington D.C. jails. I don't recall any of you that complain about the unfair treatment of illegals who broke into the United States saying one thing about the unreasonable denial of those January 6 protesters due process rights. And they are American Citizens. Or did I miss it somehow?
The pardoned violent insurrectionists received due process. If it helps I'll give a short layman's version of due process: notice and an opportunity to be heard.
I am absolutely befuddled by your objection to exactly how law enforcement and prosecution works. Hours of investigative work followed by charges. Bundling infractions? Yeah, that's called a charging instrument and such bundling happens on a daily basis in every DA's office in the country.
Nothing biased about this, just a reporter who doesn't understand how our legal system works.
To address just one obvious bull**** claim: Defendant X didn't get most of the 41,000 hours of video. Oh noes.
Defendant X doesn't appear in all of that footage. EZ
Will some get reversals or remands? Probably some. I mean there's a thousand plus.
But we'll never know because the guy that asked for the violence pardoned the violent.
And the corrupt.
Anyone with $/influence/MAGA leanings. Sad!
Are you seriously crying about criminal rights?
Now those are the facts.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/jul/29/john-strand-jan-6-defendant-said-he-endured-four-m/
J 6 was one of the saddest days in American history
Americans attacked our Capitol
Exactly
It's like people forget the Capitol was literally bombed in the 1980s….and of course the British burned the White House and most of DC in the war of 1812.
America bounced right back
If an open, violent attempt to nullify a valid election isn't a sad day for the republic, I don't know what to say. It remains to be seen whether we bounce back.
2020 Election Fraud and the Courts - American ThinkerSam Lowry said:Completely false.gtownbear said:Funny thing the courts mostly ruled no one had standing to bring the cases so no evidence ever saw the light of day.Sam Lowry said:It's not really about the building.Redbrickbear said:KaiBear said:Not even in the top 100.Osodecentx said:Sam Lowry said:Charged with a felony, i.e. not a misdemeanor.gtownbear said:I refer you Sam to the link below. I will look up some others as the courts threw out some of the cases against January 6 defendants.Sam Lowry said:Those are not facts. Misdemeanor defendants were not held for years or in solitary confinement.gtownbear said:No I am talking about numerous Americans at the Capital on January 6 having all types of incidental charges added to misdemeanors to lengthen their potential sentences or in most cases get them to plead guilty rather than go to trial. And while all this was going on for years, many of them were denied bail so were held in the rotten D.C. jails, some in solitary confinement. So in fact these American Citizens had their civil rights taken away from them during this time due to the abuse of power by Attorney General Merrick Garland. That is what was taking place and many activist judges were culpable in agreeing with the prosecutors who said these folks were a danger to society and should remain in jail until trial even though most had no criminal record.quash said:gtownbear said:I would remind you that the guy you say asked for the violence and pardoned the violent asked for everyone to go "peacefully" to the Capital and protest and make their voices heard. And again numerous protesters on January 6 were arrested and kept in jail, many for periods in solitary confinement, for up to two years without trial and denied bail. They were saved by President Trump's second election and his pardons realizing how many of them were overcharged for misdemeanors while denied rights most are afforded without prior criminal records.quash said:gtownbear said:https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/an-egregious-denial-of-due-process-for-jan-6-protesters/quash said:gtownbear said:
Support for your assertion that Obama deportations were done without due process?
Again, because of the second grade level you're displaying, this is not about one individual.
I would assume he used warrants from Administrative Judges with deportation orders, and other pertinent laws like those caught just entering the country and were allowed to be removed and other means. One thing I am sure of is there were not three million civil trials for all of those Obama removed. The left just never complained because it was a democrat who did the removing rather than President Trump. When the media and the leftist groups whine and complain about an issue constantly in mass, it can bring real focus to something that otherwise would not be there, would you not agree.
As to the constant due process mantra I would ask about the January 6 defendants who the FBI spent an insane amount of time studying tens of thousands of hours of video to hunt down anyone at the Capital that day, and the Justice Department would bundle the infractions to increase jail time to years over minor misdemeanors in many cases. Furthermore, they denied many decent folks their civil rights and "due process" by keeping them in jail for up to two years awaiting trial in the seedy Washington D.C. jails. I don't recall any of you that complain about the unfair treatment of illegals who broke into the United States saying one thing about the unreasonable denial of those January 6 protesters due process rights. And they are American Citizens. Or did I miss it somehow?
The pardoned violent insurrectionists received due process. If it helps I'll give a short layman's version of due process: notice and an opportunity to be heard.
I am absolutely befuddled by your objection to exactly how law enforcement and prosecution works. Hours of investigative work followed by charges. Bundling infractions? Yeah, that's called a charging instrument and such bundling happens on a daily basis in every DA's office in the country.
Nothing biased about this, just a reporter who doesn't understand how our legal system works.
To address just one obvious bull**** claim: Defendant X didn't get most of the 41,000 hours of video. Oh noes.
Defendant X doesn't appear in all of that footage. EZ
Will some get reversals or remands? Probably some. I mean there's a thousand plus.
But we'll never know because the guy that asked for the violence pardoned the violent.
And the corrupt.
Anyone with $/influence/MAGA leanings. Sad!
Are you seriously crying about criminal rights?
Now those are the facts.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/jul/29/john-strand-jan-6-defendant-said-he-endured-four-m/
J 6 was one of the saddest days in American history
Americans attacked our Capitol
Exactly
It's like people forget the Capitol was literally bombed in the 1980s….and of course the British burned the White House and most of DC in the war of 1812.
America bounced right back
If an open, violent attempt to nullify a valid election isn't a sad day for the republic, I don't know what to say. It remains to be seen whether we bounce back.
The substantive issues were addressed in other lawsuits or, in many cases, abandoned by Trump's lawyers once they got into court. To take the first example from the first case in your article, the Texas lawsuit alleged that a city worker in Detroit was instructed not to follow some voter identification requirements. A group of voters in Michigan (you know, the ones with standing) filed suit alleging the same thing. After hearing the evidence, the judge denied an injunction because he found it not to be credible. And all this happened a month before the US Supreme Court denied the Texas motion.gtownbear said:2020 Election Fraud and the Courts - American ThinkerSam Lowry said:Completely false.gtownbear said:Funny thing the courts mostly ruled no one had standing to bring the cases so no evidence ever saw the light of day.Sam Lowry said:It's not really about the building.Redbrickbear said:KaiBear said:Not even in the top 100.Osodecentx said:Sam Lowry said:Charged with a felony, i.e. not a misdemeanor.gtownbear said:I refer you Sam to the link below. I will look up some others as the courts threw out some of the cases against January 6 defendants.Sam Lowry said:Those are not facts. Misdemeanor defendants were not held for years or in solitary confinement.gtownbear said:No I am talking about numerous Americans at the Capital on January 6 having all types of incidental charges added to misdemeanors to lengthen their potential sentences or in most cases get them to plead guilty rather than go to trial. And while all this was going on for years, many of them were denied bail so were held in the rotten D.C. jails, some in solitary confinement. So in fact these American Citizens had their civil rights taken away from them during this time due to the abuse of power by Attorney General Merrick Garland. That is what was taking place and many activist judges were culpable in agreeing with the prosecutors who said these folks were a danger to society and should remain in jail until trial even though most had no criminal record.quash said:gtownbear said:I would remind you that the guy you say asked for the violence and pardoned the violent asked for everyone to go "peacefully" to the Capital and protest and make their voices heard. And again numerous protesters on January 6 were arrested and kept in jail, many for periods in solitary confinement, for up to two years without trial and denied bail. They were saved by President Trump's second election and his pardons realizing how many of them were overcharged for misdemeanors while denied rights most are afforded without prior criminal records.quash said:gtownbear said:https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/an-egregious-denial-of-due-process-for-jan-6-protesters/quash said:gtownbear said:
Support for your assertion that Obama deportations were done without due process?
Again, because of the second grade level you're displaying, this is not about one individual.
I would assume he used warrants from Administrative Judges with deportation orders, and other pertinent laws like those caught just entering the country and were allowed to be removed and other means. One thing I am sure of is there were not three million civil trials for all of those Obama removed. The left just never complained because it was a democrat who did the removing rather than President Trump. When the media and the leftist groups whine and complain about an issue constantly in mass, it can bring real focus to something that otherwise would not be there, would you not agree.
As to the constant due process mantra I would ask about the January 6 defendants who the FBI spent an insane amount of time studying tens of thousands of hours of video to hunt down anyone at the Capital that day, and the Justice Department would bundle the infractions to increase jail time to years over minor misdemeanors in many cases. Furthermore, they denied many decent folks their civil rights and "due process" by keeping them in jail for up to two years awaiting trial in the seedy Washington D.C. jails. I don't recall any of you that complain about the unfair treatment of illegals who broke into the United States saying one thing about the unreasonable denial of those January 6 protesters due process rights. And they are American Citizens. Or did I miss it somehow?
The pardoned violent insurrectionists received due process. If it helps I'll give a short layman's version of due process: notice and an opportunity to be heard.
I am absolutely befuddled by your objection to exactly how law enforcement and prosecution works. Hours of investigative work followed by charges. Bundling infractions? Yeah, that's called a charging instrument and such bundling happens on a daily basis in every DA's office in the country.
Nothing biased about this, just a reporter who doesn't understand how our legal system works.
To address just one obvious bull**** claim: Defendant X didn't get most of the 41,000 hours of video. Oh noes.
Defendant X doesn't appear in all of that footage. EZ
Will some get reversals or remands? Probably some. I mean there's a thousand plus.
But we'll never know because the guy that asked for the violence pardoned the violent.
And the corrupt.
Anyone with $/influence/MAGA leanings. Sad!
Are you seriously crying about criminal rights?
Now those are the facts.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/jul/29/john-strand-jan-6-defendant-said-he-endured-four-m/
J 6 was one of the saddest days in American history
Americans attacked our Capitol
Exactly
It's like people forget the Capitol was literally bombed in the 1980s….and of course the British burned the White House and most of DC in the war of 1812.
America bounced right back
If an open, violent attempt to nullify a valid election isn't a sad day for the republic, I don't know what to say. It remains to be seen whether we bounce back.
Sam, oh Sam. Your "conservative" side is really showing huge holes in itSam Lowry said:It's no different now, except that Trump's people are even less qualified.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:Each day our country was run by an unknown, unelected person or persons during the Biden administration. That's at least one hundred.Sam Lowry said:Name 100 and put it in perspective for me.EatMoreSalmon said:No one said it wasn't sad. Just that there are sadder moments in our history.Sam Lowry said:It's not really about the building.Redbrickbear said:KaiBear said:Not even in the top 100.Osodecentx said:Sam Lowry said:Charged with a felony, i.e. not a misdemeanor.gtownbear said:I refer you Sam to the link below. I will look up some others as the courts threw out some of the cases against January 6 defendants.Sam Lowry said:Those are not facts. Misdemeanor defendants were not held for years or in solitary confinement.gtownbear said:No I am talking about numerous Americans at the Capital on January 6 having all types of incidental charges added to misdemeanors to lengthen their potential sentences or in most cases get them to plead guilty rather than go to trial. And while all this was going on for years, many of them were denied bail so were held in the rotten D.C. jails, some in solitary confinement. So in fact these American Citizens had their civil rights taken away from them during this time due to the abuse of power by Attorney General Merrick Garland. That is what was taking place and many activist judges were culpable in agreeing with the prosecutors who said these folks were a danger to society and should remain in jail until trial even though most had no criminal record.quash said:gtownbear said:I would remind you that the guy you say asked for the violence and pardoned the violent asked for everyone to go "peacefully" to the Capital and protest and make their voices heard. And again numerous protesters on January 6 were arrested and kept in jail, many for periods in solitary confinement, for up to two years without trial and denied bail. They were saved by President Trump's second election and his pardons realizing how many of them were overcharged for misdemeanors while denied rights most are afforded without prior criminal records.quash said:gtownbear said:https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/an-egregious-denial-of-due-process-for-jan-6-protesters/quash said:gtownbear said:
Support for your assertion that Obama deportations were done without due process?
Again, because of the second grade level you're displaying, this is not about one individual.
I would assume he used warrants from Administrative Judges with deportation orders, and other pertinent laws like those caught just entering the country and were allowed to be removed and other means. One thing I am sure of is there were not three million civil trials for all of those Obama removed. The left just never complained because it was a democrat who did the removing rather than President Trump. When the media and the leftist groups whine and complain about an issue constantly in mass, it can bring real focus to something that otherwise would not be there, would you not agree.
As to the constant due process mantra I would ask about the January 6 defendants who the FBI spent an insane amount of time studying tens of thousands of hours of video to hunt down anyone at the Capital that day, and the Justice Department would bundle the infractions to increase jail time to years over minor misdemeanors in many cases. Furthermore, they denied many decent folks their civil rights and "due process" by keeping them in jail for up to two years awaiting trial in the seedy Washington D.C. jails. I don't recall any of you that complain about the unfair treatment of illegals who broke into the United States saying one thing about the unreasonable denial of those January 6 protesters due process rights. And they are American Citizens. Or did I miss it somehow?
The pardoned violent insurrectionists received due process. If it helps I'll give a short layman's version of due process: notice and an opportunity to be heard.
I am absolutely befuddled by your objection to exactly how law enforcement and prosecution works. Hours of investigative work followed by charges. Bundling infractions? Yeah, that's called a charging instrument and such bundling happens on a daily basis in every DA's office in the country.
Nothing biased about this, just a reporter who doesn't understand how our legal system works.
To address just one obvious bull**** claim: Defendant X didn't get most of the 41,000 hours of video. Oh noes.
Defendant X doesn't appear in all of that footage. EZ
Will some get reversals or remands? Probably some. I mean there's a thousand plus.
But we'll never know because the guy that asked for the violence pardoned the violent.
And the corrupt.
Anyone with $/influence/MAGA leanings. Sad!
Are you seriously crying about criminal rights?
Now those are the facts.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/jul/29/john-strand-jan-6-defendant-said-he-endured-four-m/
J 6 was one of the saddest days in American history
Americans attacked our Capitol
Exactly
It's like people forget the Capitol was literally bombed in the 1980s….and of course the British burned the White House and most of DC in the war of 1812.
America bounced right back
If an open, violent attempt to nullify a valid election isn't a sad day for the republic, I don't know what to say. It remains to be seen whether we bounce back.
Facebook Groups at; Memories of Dallas, Mem of Texas, Mem of Football in Texas, Mem Texas Music and Through a Texas Lens. Come visit! Over 100,000 members and 100,000 regular visitors
How about FBI director Christopher Wray hiding a report showing China and fake driver's licenses to get folks on the rolls to vote for Biden. Guess you have an excuse for that also. With you breaking laws by those you support are always either innocent mistakes or minor offenses. Many fraudulent activities occurred during the 2020 election due to the massive numbers of mail-in ballots across the nation. It was impossible to match the ballot with that individual signature and real person, and therefore the control of most of those ballots was not possible.Sam Lowry said:The substantive issues were addressed in other lawsuits or, in many cases, abandoned by Trump's lawyers once they got into court. To take the first example from the first case in your article, the Texas lawsuit alleged that a city worker in Detroit was instructed not to follow some voter identification requirements. A group of voters in Michigan (you know, the ones with standing) filed suit alleging the same thing. After hearing the evidence, the judge denied an injunction because he found it not to be credible. And all this happened a month before the US Supreme Court denied the Texas motion.gtownbear said:2020 Election Fraud and the Courts - American ThinkerSam Lowry said:Completely false.gtownbear said:Funny thing the courts mostly ruled no one had standing to bring the cases so no evidence ever saw the light of day.Sam Lowry said:It's not really about the building.Redbrickbear said:KaiBear said:Not even in the top 100.Osodecentx said:Sam Lowry said:Charged with a felony, i.e. not a misdemeanor.gtownbear said:I refer you Sam to the link below. I will look up some others as the courts threw out some of the cases against January 6 defendants.Sam Lowry said:Those are not facts. Misdemeanor defendants were not held for years or in solitary confinement.gtownbear said:No I am talking about numerous Americans at the Capital on January 6 having all types of incidental charges added to misdemeanors to lengthen their potential sentences or in most cases get them to plead guilty rather than go to trial. And while all this was going on for years, many of them were denied bail so were held in the rotten D.C. jails, some in solitary confinement. So in fact these American Citizens had their civil rights taken away from them during this time due to the abuse of power by Attorney General Merrick Garland. That is what was taking place and many activist judges were culpable in agreeing with the prosecutors who said these folks were a danger to society and should remain in jail until trial even though most had no criminal record.quash said:gtownbear said:I would remind you that the guy you say asked for the violence and pardoned the violent asked for everyone to go "peacefully" to the Capital and protest and make their voices heard. And again numerous protesters on January 6 were arrested and kept in jail, many for periods in solitary confinement, for up to two years without trial and denied bail. They were saved by President Trump's second election and his pardons realizing how many of them were overcharged for misdemeanors while denied rights most are afforded without prior criminal records.quash said:gtownbear said:https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/an-egregious-denial-of-due-process-for-jan-6-protesters/quash said:gtownbear said:
Support for your assertion that Obama deportations were done without due process?
Again, because of the second grade level you're displaying, this is not about one individual.
I would assume he used warrants from Administrative Judges with deportation orders, and other pertinent laws like those caught just entering the country and were allowed to be removed and other means. One thing I am sure of is there were not three million civil trials for all of those Obama removed. The left just never complained because it was a democrat who did the removing rather than President Trump. When the media and the leftist groups whine and complain about an issue constantly in mass, it can bring real focus to something that otherwise would not be there, would you not agree.
As to the constant due process mantra I would ask about the January 6 defendants who the FBI spent an insane amount of time studying tens of thousands of hours of video to hunt down anyone at the Capital that day, and the Justice Department would bundle the infractions to increase jail time to years over minor misdemeanors in many cases. Furthermore, they denied many decent folks their civil rights and "due process" by keeping them in jail for up to two years awaiting trial in the seedy Washington D.C. jails. I don't recall any of you that complain about the unfair treatment of illegals who broke into the United States saying one thing about the unreasonable denial of those January 6 protesters due process rights. And they are American Citizens. Or did I miss it somehow?
The pardoned violent insurrectionists received due process. If it helps I'll give a short layman's version of due process: notice and an opportunity to be heard.
I am absolutely befuddled by your objection to exactly how law enforcement and prosecution works. Hours of investigative work followed by charges. Bundling infractions? Yeah, that's called a charging instrument and such bundling happens on a daily basis in every DA's office in the country.
Nothing biased about this, just a reporter who doesn't understand how our legal system works.
To address just one obvious bull**** claim: Defendant X didn't get most of the 41,000 hours of video. Oh noes.
Defendant X doesn't appear in all of that footage. EZ
Will some get reversals or remands? Probably some. I mean there's a thousand plus.
But we'll never know because the guy that asked for the violence pardoned the violent.
And the corrupt.
Anyone with $/influence/MAGA leanings. Sad!
Are you seriously crying about criminal rights?
Now those are the facts.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/jul/29/john-strand-jan-6-defendant-said-he-endured-four-m/
J 6 was one of the saddest days in American history
Americans attacked our Capitol
Exactly
It's like people forget the Capitol was literally bombed in the 1980s….and of course the British burned the White House and most of DC in the war of 1812.
America bounced right back
If an open, violent attempt to nullify a valid election isn't a sad day for the republic, I don't know what to say. It remains to be seen whether we bounce back.
And the only logical reason democrats constantly fight voter ID's and other measures which insure accurate voting, is because democrats need to cheat to win.
This is true. And use taxpayer money to do the cheat. See USAID and DNC running out of money todaygtownbear said:How about FBI director Christopher Wray hiding a report showing China and fake driver's licenses to get folks on the rolls to vote for Biden. Guess you have an excuse for that also. With you breaking laws by those you support are always either innocent mistakes or minor offenses. Many fraudulent activities occurred during the 2020 election due to the massive numbers of mail-in ballots across the nation. It was impossible to match the ballot with that individual signature and real person, and therefore the control of most of those ballots was not possible.Sam Lowry said:The substantive issues were addressed in other lawsuits or, in many cases, abandoned by Trump's lawyers once they got into court. To take the first example from the first case in your article, the Texas lawsuit alleged that a city worker in Detroit was instructed not to follow some voter identification requirements. A group of voters in Michigan (you know, the ones with standing) filed suit alleging the same thing. After hearing the evidence, the judge denied an injunction because he found it not to be credible. And all this happened a month before the US Supreme Court denied the Texas motion.gtownbear said:2020 Election Fraud and the Courts - American ThinkerSam Lowry said:Completely false.gtownbear said:Funny thing the courts mostly ruled no one had standing to bring the cases so no evidence ever saw the light of day.Sam Lowry said:It's not really about the building.Redbrickbear said:KaiBear said:Not even in the top 100.Osodecentx said:Sam Lowry said:Charged with a felony, i.e. not a misdemeanor.gtownbear said:I refer you Sam to the link below. I will look up some others as the courts threw out some of the cases against January 6 defendants.Sam Lowry said:Those are not facts. Misdemeanor defendants were not held for years or in solitary confinement.gtownbear said:No I am talking about numerous Americans at the Capital on January 6 having all types of incidental charges added to misdemeanors to lengthen their potential sentences or in most cases get them to plead guilty rather than go to trial. And while all this was going on for years, many of them were denied bail so were held in the rotten D.C. jails, some in solitary confinement. So in fact these American Citizens had their civil rights taken away from them during this time due to the abuse of power by Attorney General Merrick Garland. That is what was taking place and many activist judges were culpable in agreeing with the prosecutors who said these folks were a danger to society and should remain in jail until trial even though most had no criminal record.quash said:gtownbear said:
afforded without prior criminal records.
Are you seriously crying about criminal rights?
Now those are the facts.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/jul/29/john-strand-jan-6-defendant-said-he-endured-four-m/
J 6 was one of the saddest days in American history
Americans attacked our Capitol
Exactly
It's like people forget the Capitol was literally bombed in the 1980s….and of course the British burned the White House and most of DC in the war of 1812.
America bounced right back
If an open, violent attempt to nullify a valid election isn't a sad day for the republic, I don't know what to say. It remains to be seen whether we bounce back.
And the only logical reason democrats constantly fight voter ID's and other measures which insure accurate voting, is because democrats need to cheat to win.
Facebook Groups at; Memories of Dallas, Mem of Texas, Mem of Football in Texas, Mem Texas Music and Through a Texas Lens. Come visit! Over 100,000 members and 100,000 regular visitors
You are absolutely correct. We have been paying for our own demise unfortunately. Hopefully most of that is coming to an end. It appears that the democrats were funding many left wing radical groups through the bloated budgets and those groups in turn were having an effect on our elections while causing trouble in other areas as well. As you say with our money. This also shows that the waste in our federal budget is unimaginable. May the Good Lord save us.Assassin said:This is true. And use taxpayer money to do the cheat. See USAID and DNC running out of money todaygtownbear said:How about FBI director Christopher Wray hiding a report showing China and fake driver's licenses to get folks on the rolls to vote for Biden. Guess you have an excuse for that also. With you breaking laws by those you support are always either innocent mistakes or minor offenses. Many fraudulent activities occurred during the 2020 election due to the massive numbers of mail-in ballots across the nation. It was impossible to match the ballot with that individual signature and real person, and therefore the control of most of those ballots was not possible.Sam Lowry said:The substantive issues were addressed in other lawsuits or, in many cases, abandoned by Trump's lawyers once they got into court. To take the first example from the first case in your article, the Texas lawsuit alleged that a city worker in Detroit was instructed not to follow some voter identification requirements. A group of voters in Michigan (you know, the ones with standing) filed suit alleging the same thing. After hearing the evidence, the judge denied an injunction because he found it not to be credible. And all this happened a month before the US Supreme Court denied the Texas motion.gtownbear said:2020 Election Fraud and the Courts - American ThinkerSam Lowry said:Completely false.gtownbear said:Funny thing the courts mostly ruled no one had standing to bring the cases so no evidence ever saw the light of day.Sam Lowry said:It's not really about the building.Redbrickbear said:KaiBear said:Not even in the top 100.Osodecentx said:Sam Lowry said:Charged with a felony, i.e. not a misdemeanor.gtownbear said:I refer you Sam to the link below. I will look up some others as the courts threw out some of the cases against January 6 defendants.Sam Lowry said:Those are not facts. Misdemeanor defendants were not held for years or in solitary confinement.gtownbear said:No I am talking about numerous Americans at the Capital on January 6 having all types of incidental charges added to misdemeanors to lengthen their potential sentences or in most cases get them to plead guilty rather than go to trial. And while all this was going on for years, many of them were denied bail so were held in the rotten D.C. jails, some in solitary confinement. So in fact these American Citizens had their civil rights taken away from them during this time due to the abuse of power by Attorney General Merrick Garland. That is what was taking place and many activist judges were culpable in agreeing with the prosecutors who said these folks were a danger to society and should remain in jail until trial even though most had no criminal record.quash said:gtownbear said:
afforded without prior criminal records.
Are you seriously crying about criminal rights?
Now those are the facts.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/jul/29/john-strand-jan-6-defendant-said-he-endured-four-m/
J 6 was one of the saddest days in American history
Americans attacked our Capitol
Exactly
It's like people forget the Capitol was literally bombed in the 1980s….and of course the British burned the White House and most of DC in the war of 1812.
America bounced right back
If an open, violent attempt to nullify a valid election isn't a sad day for the republic, I don't know what to say. It remains to be seen whether we bounce back.
And the only logical reason democrats constantly fight voter ID's and other measures which insure accurate voting, is because democrats need to cheat to win.
It's not yet clear what happened there, but the claims certainly warrant extreme skepticism in light of Trump's past record and his open hostility to Wray.gtownbear said:How about FBI director Christopher Wray hiding a report showing China and fake driver's licenses to get folks on the rolls to vote for Biden. Guess you have an excuse for that also. With you breaking laws by those you support are always either innocent mistakes or minor offenses. Many fraudulent activities occurred during the 2020 election due to the massive numbers of mail-in ballots across the nation. It was impossible to match the ballot with that individual signature and real person, and therefore the control of most of those ballots was not possible.Sam Lowry said:The substantive issues were addressed in other lawsuits or, in many cases, abandoned by Trump's lawyers once they got into court. To take the first example from the first case in your article, the Texas lawsuit alleged that a city worker in Detroit was instructed not to follow some voter identification requirements. A group of voters in Michigan (you know, the ones with standing) filed suit alleging the same thing. After hearing the evidence, the judge denied an injunction because he found it not to be credible. And all this happened a month before the US Supreme Court denied the Texas motion.gtownbear said:2020 Election Fraud and the Courts - American ThinkerSam Lowry said:Completely false.gtownbear said:Funny thing the courts mostly ruled no one had standing to bring the cases so no evidence ever saw the light of day.Sam Lowry said:It's not really about the building.Redbrickbear said:KaiBear said:Not even in the top 100.Osodecentx said:Sam Lowry said:Charged with a felony, i.e. not a misdemeanor.gtownbear said:I refer you Sam to the link below. I will look up some others as the courts threw out some of the cases against January 6 defendants.Sam Lowry said:Those are not facts. Misdemeanor defendants were not held for years or in solitary confinement.gtownbear said:No I am talking about numerous Americans at the Capital on January 6 having all types of incidental charges added to misdemeanors to lengthen their potential sentences or in most cases get them to plead guilty rather than go to trial. And while all this was going on for years, many of them were denied bail so were held in the rotten D.C. jails, some in solitary confinement. So in fact these American Citizens had their civil rights taken away from them during this time due to the abuse of power by Attorney General Merrick Garland. That is what was taking place and many activist judges were culpable in agreeing with the prosecutors who said these folks were a danger to society and should remain in jail until trial even though most had no criminal record.quash said:gtownbear said:I would remind you that the guy you say asked for the violence and pardoned the violent asked for everyone to go "peacefully" to the Capital and protest and make their voices heard. And again numerous protesters on January 6 were arrested and kept in jail, many for periods in solitary confinement, for up to two years without trial and denied bail. They were saved by President Trump's second election and his pardons realizing how many of them were overcharged for misdemeanors while denied rights most are afforded without prior criminal records.quash said:gtownbear said:https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/an-egregious-denial-of-due-process-for-jan-6-protesters/quash said:gtownbear said:
Support for your assertion that Obama deportations were done without due process?
Again, because of the second grade level you're displaying, this is not about one individual.
I would assume he used warrants from Administrative Judges with deportation orders, and other pertinent laws like those caught just entering the country and were allowed to be removed and other means. One thing I am sure of is there were not three million civil trials for all of those Obama removed. The left just never complained because it was a democrat who did the removing rather than President Trump. When the media and the leftist groups whine and complain about an issue constantly in mass, it can bring real focus to something that otherwise would not be there, would you not agree.
As to the constant due process mantra I would ask about the January 6 defendants who the FBI spent an insane amount of time studying tens of thousands of hours of video to hunt down anyone at the Capital that day, and the Justice Department would bundle the infractions to increase jail time to years over minor misdemeanors in many cases. Furthermore, they denied many decent folks their civil rights and "due process" by keeping them in jail for up to two years awaiting trial in the seedy Washington D.C. jails. I don't recall any of you that complain about the unfair treatment of illegals who broke into the United States saying one thing about the unreasonable denial of those January 6 protesters due process rights. And they are American Citizens. Or did I miss it somehow?
The pardoned violent insurrectionists received due process. If it helps I'll give a short layman's version of due process: notice and an opportunity to be heard.
I am absolutely befuddled by your objection to exactly how law enforcement and prosecution works. Hours of investigative work followed by charges. Bundling infractions? Yeah, that's called a charging instrument and such bundling happens on a daily basis in every DA's office in the country.
Nothing biased about this, just a reporter who doesn't understand how our legal system works.
To address just one obvious bull**** claim: Defendant X didn't get most of the 41,000 hours of video. Oh noes.
Defendant X doesn't appear in all of that footage. EZ
Will some get reversals or remands? Probably some. I mean there's a thousand plus.
But we'll never know because the guy that asked for the violence pardoned the violent.
And the corrupt.
Anyone with $/influence/MAGA leanings. Sad!
Are you seriously crying about criminal rights?
Now those are the facts.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/jul/29/john-strand-jan-6-defendant-said-he-endured-four-m/
J 6 was one of the saddest days in American history
Americans attacked our Capitol
Exactly
It's like people forget the Capitol was literally bombed in the 1980s….and of course the British burned the White House and most of DC in the war of 1812.
America bounced right back
If an open, violent attempt to nullify a valid election isn't a sad day for the republic, I don't know what to say. It remains to be seen whether we bounce back.
And the only logical reason democrats constantly fight voter ID's and other measures which insure accurate voting, is because democrats need to cheat to win.
Sam can always be counted upon to speak up for the Biden opinion.
And that says quite a lot. He had to figure if it was Biden's opinion or the person's finger on the auto pen!Oldbear83 said:
Sam can always be counted upon to speak up for the Biden opinion.
Sam, it was a federal government report that Wray hid from congress and the public and then lied when testifying before congress about foreign intervention in the election. Trump did not have anything to do with it. Why bring him into it? You folks are really something. Do you know that hatred can consume you? You cannot even admit to bad behavior when the evidence is indisputable if it helps Trump.Sam Lowry said:It's not yet clear what happened there, but the claims certainly warrant extreme skepticism in light of Trump's past record and his open hostility to Wray.gtownbear said:How about FBI director Christopher Wray hiding a report showing China and fake driver's licenses to get folks on the rolls to vote for Biden. Guess you have an excuse for that also. With you breaking laws by those you support are always either innocent mistakes or minor offenses. Many fraudulent activities occurred during the 2020 election due to the massive numbers of mail-in ballots across the nation. It was impossible to match the ballot with that individual signature and real person, and therefore the control of most of those ballots was not possible.Sam Lowry said:The substantive issues were addressed in other lawsuits or, in many cases, abandoned by Trump's lawyers once they got into court. To take the first example from the first case in your article, the Texas lawsuit alleged that a city worker in Detroit was instructed not to follow some voter identification requirements. A group of voters in Michigan (you know, the ones with standing) filed suit alleging the same thing. After hearing the evidence, the judge denied an injunction because he found it not to be credible. And all this happened a month before the US Supreme Court denied the Texas motion.gtownbear said:2020 Election Fraud and the Courts - American ThinkerSam Lowry said:Completely false.gtownbear said:Funny thing the courts mostly ruled no one had standing to bring the cases so no evidence ever saw the light of day.Sam Lowry said:It's not really about the building.Redbrickbear said:KaiBear said:Not even in the top 100.Osodecentx said:Sam Lowry said:Charged with a felony, i.e. not a misdemeanor.gtownbear said:I refer you Sam to the link below. I will look up some others as the courts threw out some of the cases against January 6 defendants.Sam Lowry said:Those are not facts. Misdemeanor defendants were not held for years or in solitary confinement.gtownbear said:No I am talking about numerous Americans at the Capital on January 6 having all types of incidental charges added to misdemeanors to lengthen their potential sentences or in most cases get them to plead guilty rather than go to trial. And while all this was going on for years, many of them were denied bail so were held in the rotten D.C. jails, some in solitary confinement. So in fact these American Citizens had their civil rights taken away from them during this time due to the abuse of power by Attorney General Merrick Garland. That is what was taking place and many activist judges were culpable in agreeing with the prosecutors who said these folks were a danger to society and should remain in jail until trial even though most had no criminal record.quash said:gtownbear said:I would remind you that the guy you say asked for the violence and pardoned the violent asked for everyone to go "peacefully" to the Capital and protest and make their voices heard. And again numerous protesters on January 6 were arrested and kept in jail, many for periods in solitary confinement, for up to two years without trial and denied bail. They were saved by President Trump's second election and his pardons realizing how many of them were overcharged for misdemeanors while denied rights most are afforded without prior criminal records.quash said:gtownbear said:https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/an-egregious-denial-of-due-process-for-jan-6-protesters/quash said:gtownbear said:
Support for your assertion that Obama deportations were done without due process?
Again, because of the second grade level you're displaying, this is not about one individual.
I would assume he used warrants from Administrative Judges with deportation orders, and other pertinent laws like those caught just entering the country and were allowed to be removed and other means. One thing I am sure of is there were not three million civil trials for all of those Obama removed. The left just never complained because it was a democrat who did the removing rather than President Trump. When the media and the leftist groups whine and complain about an issue constantly in mass, it can bring real focus to something that otherwise would not be there, would you not agree.
As to the constant due process mantra I would ask about the January 6 defendants who the FBI spent an insane amount of time studying tens of thousands of hours of video to hunt down anyone at the Capital that day, and the Justice Department would bundle the infractions to increase jail time to years over minor misdemeanors in many cases. Furthermore, they denied many decent folks their civil rights and "due process" by keeping them in jail for up to two years awaiting trial in the seedy Washington D.C. jails. I don't recall any of you that complain about the unfair treatment of illegals who broke into the United States saying one thing about the unreasonable denial of those January 6 protesters due process rights. And they are American Citizens. Or did I miss it somehow?
The pardoned violent insurrectionists received due process. If it helps I'll give a short layman's version of due process: notice and an opportunity to be heard.
I am absolutely befuddled by your objection to exactly how law enforcement and prosecution works. Hours of investigative work followed by charges. Bundling infractions? Yeah, that's called a charging instrument and such bundling happens on a daily basis in every DA's office in the country.
Nothing biased about this, just a reporter who doesn't understand how our legal system works.
To address just one obvious bull**** claim: Defendant X didn't get most of the 41,000 hours of video. Oh noes.
Defendant X doesn't appear in all of that footage. EZ
Will some get reversals or remands? Probably some. I mean there's a thousand plus.
But we'll never know because the guy that asked for the violence pardoned the violent.
And the corrupt.
Anyone with $/influence/MAGA leanings. Sad!
Are you seriously crying about criminal rights?
Now those are the facts.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/jul/29/john-strand-jan-6-defendant-said-he-endured-four-m/
J 6 was one of the saddest days in American history
Americans attacked our Capitol
Exactly
It's like people forget the Capitol was literally bombed in the 1980s….and of course the British burned the White House and most of DC in the war of 1812.
America bounced right back
If an open, violent attempt to nullify a valid election isn't a sad day for the republic, I don't know what to say. It remains to be seen whether we bounce back.
And the only logical reason democrats constantly fight voter ID's and other measures which insure accurate voting, is because democrats need to cheat to win.
It was not hidden from Congress. It was recalled from an FBI office, evidently because the whistleblower who provided the information needed to be re-interviewed. It's not clear whether there were other reasons or whether standard procedure was followed. That's one of the issues Congress is investigating. There's also no evidence that Wray was involved. It's related to Trump because Kash Patel works for Trump and Trump has a history of lying about the 2020 election and promising vengeance against his enemies, particularly people like Wray who contradicted him on the election issue.
Also, please note that I have never been a Biden supporter.
Also, please note that I have never been a Biden supporter.
Sam
Your tone is not going to cut it, much less responding in a civil manner. You need to get with the program and look for opportunities to demean, humiliate, piling on the vitriolic rhetoric at every opportunity, even if one doesn't exist. Not everyone fits this stereotype, but as you have personally experienced, too many really don't care. Kind of reminds you of someone who sets the example.
Your tone is not going to cut it, much less responding in a civil manner. You need to get with the program and look for opportunities to demean, humiliate, piling on the vitriolic rhetoric at every opportunity, even if one doesn't exist. Not everyone fits this stereotype, but as you have personally experienced, too many really don't care. Kind of reminds you of someone who sets the example.
Sam, you channel the Biden opinion as often as the cast of The View does.
Get a room, you two...BUDOS said:
Sam
Your tone is not going to cut it, much less responding in a civil manner. You need to get with the program and look for opportunities to demean, humiliate, piling on the vitriolic rhetoric at every opportunity, even if one doesn't exist. Not everyone fits this stereotype, but as you have personally experienced, too many really don't care. Kind of reminds you of someone who sets the example.
Facebook Groups at; Memories of Dallas, Mem of Texas, Mem of Football in Texas, Mem Texas Music and Through a Texas Lens. Come visit! Over 100,000 members and 100,000 regular visitors
Below is an article about what happened in regards to China and the election. I refer you specifically to the portions relating to the FBI's actions which Wray was in charge of. So I hope you are not telling me that the agency took this major action without his knowledge or direction. He took many actions against Trump in his first term and so one would assume that he ordered this report to be deep sixed. They discovered thousands of these fake licenses going to the contested states which could have effected the election. So you can study each word I say to find something, but you know exactly what I mean. Argue with the article not me.Sam Lowry said:
It was not hidden from Congress. It was recalled from an FBI office, evidently because the whistleblower who provided the information needed to be re-interviewed. It's not clear whether there were other reasons or whether standard procedure was followed. That's one of the issues Congress is investigating. There's also no evidence that Wray was involved. It's related to Trump because Kash Patel works for Trump and Trump has a history of lying about the 2020 election and promising vengeance against his enemies, particularly people like Wray who contradicted him on the election issue.
Also, please note that I have never been a Biden supporter.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/updated-report-wrays-fbi-ordered-other-intel-agencies-to-destroy-report-on-plot-to-steal-2020-election/ar-AA1GX31Y
I don't know that it was a major action. We also don't know that Wray was personally involved. Seizing fake IDs at airports is nothing new. They can be used for all kinds of fraudulent purposes. The claim that it was related to the election came from a source who got it from another unidentified source who got it from still another unidentified source in the Chinese government. It's easy to see why no action was taken unless and until it could be corroborated.gtownbear said:Below is an article about what happened in regards to China and the election. I refer you specifically to the portions relating to the FBI's actions which Wray was in charge of. So I hope you are not telling me that the agency took this major action without his knowledge or direction. He took many actions against Trump in his first term and so one would assume that he ordered this report to be deep sixed. They discovered thousands of these fake licenses going to the contested states which could have effected the election. So you can study each word I say to find something, but you know exactly what I mean. Argue with the article not me.Sam Lowry said:
It was not hidden from Congress. It was recalled from an FBI office, evidently because the whistleblower who provided the information needed to be re-interviewed. It's not clear whether there were other reasons or whether standard procedure was followed. That's one of the issues Congress is investigating. There's also no evidence that Wray was involved. It's related to Trump because Kash Patel works for Trump and Trump has a history of lying about the 2020 election and promising vengeance against his enemies, particularly people like Wray who contradicted him on the election issue.
Also, please note that I have never been a Biden supporter.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/updated-report-wrays-fbi-ordered-other-intel-agencies-to-destroy-report-on-plot-to-steal-2020-election/ar-AA1GX31Y
Sam Lowry said:I don't know that it was a major action. We also don't know that Wray was personally involved. Seizing fake IDs at airports is nothing new. They can be used for all kinds of fraudulent purposes. The claim that it was related to the election came from a source who got it from another unidentified source who got it from still another unidentified source in the Chinese government. It's easy to see why no action was taken unless and until it could be corroborated.gtownbear said:Below is an article about what happened in regards to China and the election. I refer you specifically to the portions relating to the FBI's actions which Wray was in charge of. So I hope you are not telling me that the agency took this major action without his knowledge or direction. He took many actions against Trump in his first term and so one would assume that he ordered this report to be deep sixed. They discovered thousands of these fake licenses going to the contested states which could have effected the election. So you can study each word I say to find something, but you know exactly what I mean. Argue with the article not me.Sam Lowry said:
It was not hidden from Congress. It was recalled from an FBI office, evidently because the whistleblower who provided the information needed to be re-interviewed. It's not clear whether there were other reasons or whether standard procedure was followed. That's one of the issues Congress is investigating. There's also no evidence that Wray was involved. It's related to Trump because Kash Patel works for Trump and Trump has a history of lying about the 2020 election and promising vengeance against his enemies, particularly people like Wray who contradicted him on the election issue.
Also, please note that I have never been a Biden supporter.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/updated-report-wrays-fbi-ordered-other-intel-agencies-to-destroy-report-on-plot-to-steal-2020-election/ar-AA1GX31Y
The source of this story appears to be the fountainhead of much fake news, the Western Journal
I believe you are giving Christopher Wray too much of a benefit of the doubt in this. If you consider Wray's involvement in hampering Trump over a long period, action to pull back this report would make sense as it would give ammunition to Trump's argument about a possible rigged election. Question for you. Would you defend your side if you knew they were wrong in their actions? Below I give you another report about Wray's actions.Sam Lowry said:I don't know that it was a major action. We also don't know that Wray was personally involved. Seizing fake IDs at airports is nothing new. They can be used for all kinds of fraudulent purposes. The claim that it was related to the election came from a source who got it from another unidentified source who got it from still another unidentified source in the Chinese government. It's easy to see why no action was taken unless and until it could be corroborated.gtownbear said:Below is an article about what happened in regards to China and the election. I refer you specifically to the portions relating to the FBI's actions which Wray was in charge of. So I hope you are not telling me that the agency took this major action without his knowledge or direction. He took many actions against Trump in his first term and so one would assume that he ordered this report to be deep sixed. They discovered thousands of these fake licenses going to the contested states which could have effected the election. So you can study each word I say to find something, but you know exactly what I mean. Argue with the article not me.Sam Lowry said:
It was not hidden from Congress. It was recalled from an FBI office, evidently because the whistleblower who provided the information needed to be re-interviewed. It's not clear whether there were other reasons or whether standard procedure was followed. That's one of the issues Congress is investigating. There's also no evidence that Wray was involved. It's related to Trump because Kash Patel works for Trump and Trump has a history of lying about the 2020 election and promising vengeance against his enemies, particularly people like Wray who contradicted him on the election issue.
Also, please note that I have never been a Biden supporter.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/updated-report-wrays-fbi-ordered-other-intel-agencies-to-destroy-report-on-plot-to-steal-2020-election/ar-AA1GX31Y
https://tfppwire.com/fbi-director-patel-gives-congress-reports-showing-china-interfered-in-the-2020-election-wray-lied-to-congress/
Wow, more and more info on the stolen 2020 elections come out. Expect Sam to poo-poo thisgtownbear said:Below is an article about what happened in regards to China and the election. I refer you specifically to the portions relating to the FBI's actions which Wray was in charge of. So I hope you are not telling me that the agency took this major action without his knowledge or direction. He took many actions against Trump in his first term and so one would assume that he ordered this report to be deep sixed. They discovered thousands of these fake licenses going to the contested states which could have effected the election. So you can study each word I say to find something, but you know exactly what I mean. Argue with the article not me.Sam Lowry said:
It was not hidden from Congress. It was recalled from an FBI office, evidently because the whistleblower who provided the information needed to be re-interviewed. It's not clear whether there were other reasons or whether standard procedure was followed. That's one of the issues Congress is investigating. There's also no evidence that Wray was involved. It's related to Trump because Kash Patel works for Trump and Trump has a history of lying about the 2020 election and promising vengeance against his enemies, particularly people like Wray who contradicted him on the election issue.
Also, please note that I have never been a Biden supporter.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/updated-report-wrays-fbi-ordered-other-intel-agencies-to-destroy-report-on-plot-to-steal-2020-election/ar-AA1GX31Y
Facebook Groups at; Memories of Dallas, Mem of Texas, Mem of Football in Texas, Mem Texas Music and Through a Texas Lens. Come visit! Over 100,000 members and 100,000 regular visitors
Assassin said:Wow, more and more info on the stolen 2020 elections come out. Expect Sam to poo-poo thisgtownbear said:Below is an article about what happened in regards to China and the election. I refer you specifically to the portions relating to the FBI's actions which Wray was in charge of. So I hope you are not telling me that the agency took this major action without his knowledge or direction. He took many actions against Trump in his first term and so one would assume that he ordered this report to be deep sixed. They discovered thousands of these fake licenses going to the contested states which could have effected the election. So you can study each word I say to find something, but you know exactly what I mean. Argue with the article not me.Sam Lowry said:
It was not hidden from Congress. It was recalled from an FBI office, evidently because the whistleblower who provided the information needed to be re-interviewed. It's not clear whether there were other reasons or whether standard procedure was followed. That's one of the issues Congress is investigating. There's also no evidence that Wray was involved. It's related to Trump because Kash Patel works for Trump and Trump has a history of lying about the 2020 election and promising vengeance against his enemies, particularly people like Wray who contradicted him on the election issue.
Also, please note that I have never been a Biden supporter.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/updated-report-wrays-fbi-ordered-other-intel-agencies-to-destroy-report-on-plot-to-steal-2020-election/ar-AA1GX31Y
Check out the source of this fake news
When the news is bad you question the sources. Well here is another one for you about Wray's tenure as Director of the FBI. Are all of these journalists putting out false information? I can wait till the dust settles on all of this, knowing my instincts and study of this will be close to the mark. Say what you will.Osodecentx said:Assassin said:Wow, more and more info on the stolen 2020 elections come out. Expect Sam to poo-poo thisgtownbear said:Below is an article about what happened in regards to China and the election. I refer you specifically to the portions relating to the FBI's actions which Wray was in charge of. So I hope you are not telling me that the agency took this major action without his knowledge or direction. He took many actions against Trump in his first term and so one would assume that he ordered this report to be deep sixed. They discovered thousands of these fake licenses going to the contested states which could have effected the election. So you can study each word I say to find something, but you know exactly what I mean. Argue with the article not me.Sam Lowry said:
It was not hidden from Congress. It was recalled from an FBI office, evidently because the whistleblower who provided the information needed to be re-interviewed. It's not clear whether there were other reasons or whether standard procedure was followed. That's one of the issues Congress is investigating. There's also no evidence that Wray was involved. It's related to Trump because Kash Patel works for Trump and Trump has a history of lying about the 2020 election and promising vengeance against his enemies, particularly people like Wray who contradicted him on the election issue.
Also, please note that I have never been a Biden supporter.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/updated-report-wrays-fbi-ordered-other-intel-agencies-to-destroy-report-on-plot-to-steal-2020-election/ar-AA1GX31Y
Check out the source of this fake news
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/fbi-s-alleged-cover-up-of-chinese-2020-plot-marks-another-stain-on-wray-s-legacy/ar-AA1H58AR
I don't give Patel the benefit of the doubt, because he's lying when he says the report is substantiated. Wray was correct to testify that there was no known interference of this kind.gtownbear said:I believe you are giving Christopher Wray too much of a benefit of the doubt in this. If you consider Wray's involvement in hampering Trump over a long period, action to pull back this report would make sense as it would give ammunition to Trump's argument about a possible rigged election. Question for you. Would you defend your side if you knew they were wrong in their actions? Below I give you another report about Wray's actions.Sam Lowry said:I don't know that it was a major action. We also don't know that Wray was personally involved. Seizing fake IDs at airports is nothing new. They can be used for all kinds of fraudulent purposes. The claim that it was related to the election came from a source who got it from another unidentified source who got it from still another unidentified source in the Chinese government. It's easy to see why no action was taken unless and until it could be corroborated.gtownbear said:Below is an article about what happened in regards to China and the election. I refer you specifically to the portions relating to the FBI's actions which Wray was in charge of. So I hope you are not telling me that the agency took this major action without his knowledge or direction. He took many actions against Trump in his first term and so one would assume that he ordered this report to be deep sixed. They discovered thousands of these fake licenses going to the contested states which could have effected the election. So you can study each word I say to find something, but you know exactly what I mean. Argue with the article not me.Sam Lowry said:
It was not hidden from Congress. It was recalled from an FBI office, evidently because the whistleblower who provided the information needed to be re-interviewed. It's not clear whether there were other reasons or whether standard procedure was followed. That's one of the issues Congress is investigating. There's also no evidence that Wray was involved. It's related to Trump because Kash Patel works for Trump and Trump has a history of lying about the 2020 election and promising vengeance against his enemies, particularly people like Wray who contradicted him on the election issue.
Also, please note that I have never been a Biden supporter.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/updated-report-wrays-fbi-ordered-other-intel-agencies-to-destroy-report-on-plot-to-steal-2020-election/ar-AA1GX31Y
https://tfppwire.com/fbi-director-patel-gives-congress-reports-showing-china-interfered-in-the-2020-election-wray-lied-to-congress/
Conservatives don't have any real representation in government, so I don't have the luxury of choosing a side to defend. If you're asking whether I'd defend wrongdoing by Democrats, no. I've criticized it often.
Our own Manchurian Candidate...Sam Lowry said:I don't give Patel the benefit of the doubt, because he's lying when he says the report is substantiated. Wray was correct to testify that there was no known interference of this kind.gtownbear said:I believe you are giving Christopher Wray too much of a benefit of the doubt in this. If you consider Wray's involvement in hampering Trump over a long period, action to pull back this report would make sense as it would give ammunition to Trump's argument about a possible rigged election. Question for you. Would you defend your side if you knew they were wrong in their actions? Below I give you another report about Wray's actions.Sam Lowry said:I don't know that it was a major action. We also don't know that Wray was personally involved. Seizing fake IDs at airports is nothing new. They can be used for all kinds of fraudulent purposes. The claim that it was related to the election came from a source who got it from another unidentified source who got it from still another unidentified source in the Chinese government. It's easy to see why no action was taken unless and until it could be corroborated.gtownbear said:Below is an article about what happened in regards to China and the election. I refer you specifically to the portions relating to the FBI's actions which Wray was in charge of. So I hope you are not telling me that the agency took this major action without his knowledge or direction. He took many actions against Trump in his first term and so one would assume that he ordered this report to be deep sixed. They discovered thousands of these fake licenses going to the contested states which could have effected the election. So you can study each word I say to find something, but you know exactly what I mean. Argue with the article not me.Sam Lowry said:
It was not hidden from Congress. It was recalled from an FBI office, evidently because the whistleblower who provided the information needed to be re-interviewed. It's not clear whether there were other reasons or whether standard procedure was followed. That's one of the issues Congress is investigating. There's also no evidence that Wray was involved. It's related to Trump because Kash Patel works for Trump and Trump has a history of lying about the 2020 election and promising vengeance against his enemies, particularly people like Wray who contradicted him on the election issue.
Also, please note that I have never been a Biden supporter.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/updated-report-wrays-fbi-ordered-other-intel-agencies-to-destroy-report-on-plot-to-steal-2020-election/ar-AA1GX31Y
https://tfppwire.com/fbi-director-patel-gives-congress-reports-showing-china-interfered-in-the-2020-election-wray-lied-to-congress/
Facebook Groups at; Memories of Dallas, Mem of Texas, Mem of Football in Texas, Mem Texas Music and Through a Texas Lens. Come visit! Over 100,000 members and 100,000 regular visitors
he will, as he should, have due process for his criminal charges here. It would be far wiser, however, to just execute the standing deportation order against him, also issued with due process.BUDOS said:
And apparently he will have had due process, regardless of the official outcome.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Psalm 119:36
JUST IN: Stephen Miller says to expect “fireworks” tomorrow when the Trump admin holds a Boston judge accountable for defying the Supreme Court.
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) June 24, 2025
Miller’s comment comes after the Supreme Court voted to allow the Trump admin to send illegals to countries other than their… pic.twitter.com/DmUR6KVHxo
Facebook Groups at; Memories of Dallas, Mem of Texas, Mem of Football in Texas, Mem Texas Music and Through a Texas Lens. Come visit! Over 100,000 members and 100,000 regular visitors
Too bad we can't pull Santa Ana out of the grave and ask him what open borders did for him...
"Smarter than the Average Bear."