whiterock said:

---

>Not a single mention in the Epstein files
>No blackmail

He just bombed the middle east for the love of the game pic.twitter.com/bhEs2dyXei

— Kaguya’s Top Gal (@hayasaka_aryan) February 20, 2026

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

>Not a single mention in the Epstein files
>No blackmail

He just bombed the middle east for the love of the game pic.twitter.com/bhEs2dyXei

— Kaguya’s Top Gal (@hayasaka_aryan) February 20, 2026

---

Yeah, he did. I always thought he was pissed his Dad didn't get to do it in 91. Cheney's interest for Haliburton didn't dissuade him either.

Never figured how Rumsfeld fit in, you have a better fix on the whole situation I am sure (seriously). I know Rummy would love the Roundup EO... (shouldn't go there, on me.)

---

whiterock said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

>Not a single mention in the Epstein files
>No blackmail

He just bombed the middle east for the love of the game pic.twitter.com/bhEs2dyXei

— Kaguya’s Top Gal (@hayasaka_aryan) February 20, 2026

---

Yeah, he did. I always thought he was pissed his Dad didn't get to do it in 91. Cheney's interest for Haliburton didn't dissuade him either.

Never figured how Rumsfeld fit in, you have a better fix on the whole situation I am sure (seriously). I know Rummy would love the Roundup EO... (shouldn't go there, on me.)

---

he had no choice.

I saw the intel on his desk. He had a WMD-capable dictator in active liaison with AQ while we were still digging bodies out of the rubble in New York City.

Put all the worst-case scenarios of invasion on the table. None of them, individually or collectively, outweighed the risk of a WMD attack on an American city from a terror group who had just engaged in a spectacularly successful operation on our soil. The choice was to run the risk of an attack with 1000x or more casualties of 9/11, or run the risk of what ended up happening in Iraq.

I'm no Bushie. W had no choice.

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

>Not a single mention in the Epstein files
>No blackmail

He just bombed the middle east for the love of the game pic.twitter.com/bhEs2dyXei

— Kaguya’s Top Gal (@hayasaka_aryan) February 20, 2026

---

Yeah, he did. I always thought he was pissed his Dad didn't get to do it in 91. Cheney's interest for Haliburton didn't dissuade him either.

Never figured how Rumsfeld fit in, you have a better fix on the whole situation I am sure (seriously). I know Rummy would love the Roundup EO... (shouldn't go there, on me.)

---

he had no choice.

I saw the intel on his desk. He had a WMD-capable dictator in active liaison with AQ while we were still digging bodies out of the rubble in New York City.

Put all the worst-case scenarios of invasion on the table. None of them, individually or collectively, outweighed the risk of a WMD attack on an American city from a terror group who had just engaged in a spectacularly successful operation on our soil. The choice was to run the risk of an attack with 1000x or more casualties of 9/11, or run the risk of what ended up happening in Iraq.

I'm no Bushie. W had no choice.

---

I watched Powell's presentation to the UN. He made a good argument. I know for a fact that chemical weapons was an issue with Iraq, alarms went off in the Gulf war. The guy would do it in a heartbeat.

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

>Not a single mention in the Epstein files
>No blackmail

He just bombed the middle east for the love of the game pic.twitter.com/bhEs2dyXei

— Kaguya’s Top Gal (@hayasaka_aryan) February 20, 2026

---

Yeah, he did. I always thought he was pissed his Dad didn't get to do it in 91. Cheney's interest for Haliburton didn't dissuade him either.

Never figured how Rumsfeld fit in, you have a better fix on the whole situation I am sure (seriously). I know Rummy would love the Roundup EO... (shouldn't go there, on me.)

---

he had no choice.

I saw the intel on his desk. He had a WMD-capable dictator in active liaison with AQ while we were still digging bodies out of the rubble in New York City.

Put all the worst-case scenarios of invasion on the table. None of them, individually or collectively, outweighed the risk of a WMD attack on an American city from a terror group who had just engaged in a spectacularly successful operation on our soil. The choice was to run the risk of an attack with 1000x or more casualties of 9/11, or run the risk of what ended up happening in Iraq.

I'm no Bushie. W had no choice.

---

I watched Powell's presentation to the UN. He made a good argument.

---

He didn't think so.

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

>Not a single mention in the Epstein files
>No blackmail

He just bombed the middle east for the love of the game pic.twitter.com/bhEs2dyXei

— Kaguya’s Top Gal (@hayasaka_aryan) February 20, 2026

---

Yeah, he did. I always thought he was pissed his Dad didn't get to do it in 91. Cheney's interest for Haliburton didn't dissuade him either.

Never figured how Rumsfeld fit in, you have a better fix on the whole situation I am sure (seriously). I know Rummy would love the Roundup EO... (shouldn't go there, on me.)

---

he had no choice.

I saw the intel on his desk. He had a WMD-capable dictator in active liaison with AQ while we were still digging bodies out of the rubble in New York City.

Put all the worst-case scenarios of invasion on the table. None of them, individually or collectively, outweighed the risk of a WMD attack on an American city from a terror group who had just engaged in a spectacularly successful operation on our soil. The choice was to run the risk of an attack with 1000x or more casualties of 9/11, or run the risk of what ended up happening in Iraq.

I'm no Bushie. W had no choice.

---

I watched Powell's presentation to the UN. He made a good argument.

---

He didn't think so.

---

Such is life. I am sure he thought he could do better and he had better intel.

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

>Not a single mention in the Epstein files
>No blackmail

He just bombed the middle east for the love of the game pic.twitter.com/bhEs2dyXei

— Kaguya’s Top Gal (@hayasaka_aryan) February 20, 2026

---

Yeah, he did. I always thought he was pissed his Dad didn't get to do it in 91. Cheney's interest for Haliburton didn't dissuade him either.

Never figured how Rumsfeld fit in, you have a better fix on the whole situation I am sure (seriously). I know Rummy would love the Roundup EO... (shouldn't go there, on me.)

---

he had no choice.

I saw the intel on his desk. He had a WMD-capable dictator in active liaison with AQ while we were still digging bodies out of the rubble in New York City.

Put all the worst-case scenarios of invasion on the table. None of them, individually or collectively, outweighed the risk of a WMD attack on an American city from a terror group who had just engaged in a spectacularly successful operation on our soil. The choice was to run the risk of an attack with 1000x or more casualties of 9/11, or run the risk of what ended up happening in Iraq.

I'm no Bushie. W had no choice.

---

I watched Powell's presentation to the UN. He made a good argument.

---

He didn't think so.

---

Such is life. I am sure he thought he could do better and he had better intel.

---

It was a scam. He should have known.

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

>Not a single mention in the Epstein files
>No blackmail

He just bombed the middle east for the love of the game pic.twitter.com/bhEs2dyXei

— Kaguya’s Top Gal (@hayasaka_aryan) February 20, 2026

---

Yeah, he did. I always thought he was pissed his Dad didn't get to do it in 91. Cheney's interest for Haliburton didn't dissuade him either.

Never figured how Rumsfeld fit in, you have a better fix on the whole situation I am sure (seriously). I know Rummy would love the Roundup EO... (shouldn't go there, on me.)

---

he had no choice.

I saw the intel on his desk. He had a WMD-capable dictator in active liaison with AQ while we were still digging bodies out of the rubble in New York City.

Put all the worst-case scenarios of invasion on the table. None of them, individually or collectively, outweighed the risk of a WMD attack on an American city from a terror group who had just engaged in a spectacularly successful operation on our soil. The choice was to run the risk of an attack with 1000x or more casualties of 9/11, or run the risk of what ended up happening in Iraq.

I'm no Bushie. W had no choice.

---

I watched Powell's presentation to the UN. He made a good argument.

---

He didn't think so.

---

Such is life. I am sure he thought he could do better and he had better intel.

---

It was a scam. He should have known.

---

The piece you miss there is that he was talking with people on the ground in Saudi and those chemical weapons warnings were going off. SCUDS were landing and we were having to mask up during the war. We still had to mask up after the war was over sometimes in Kuwait depending on what was found when they were destroying weapons caches and the oil fires. It was a legitimate scare. Powell had that in his mind, so it is really not a fair look back 35 years later and say he should have known.

---

Porteroso said:

---

He did not have the weapons our intelligence told the world he had, plain and simple. Invoking Article 5 meant not only our son's and daughters died, not to mention half a million civilians... but the sons and daughters of our allies.

War is always a choice. To pretend hands were tied is a lame attempt at avoiding responsibility.

And if we invade Iran, at least Trump will likely not make up reasons. He will just say we had to do it for our sake and Israel's. It will be the end of MAGA, but I do think he will be honest.

---

A lesson in courage for @Keir_Starmer https://t.co/vGeWtztgab

— Chris Parry (@DrChrisParry) February 22, 2026

Sam Lowry said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

>Not a single mention in the Epstein files
>No blackmail

He just bombed the middle east for the love of the game pic.twitter.com/bhEs2dyXei

— Kaguya’s Top Gal (@hayasaka_aryan) February 20, 2026

---

Yeah, he did. I always thought he was pissed his Dad didn't get to do it in 91. Cheney's interest for Haliburton didn't dissuade him either.

Never figured how Rumsfeld fit in, you have a better fix on the whole situation I am sure (seriously). I know Rummy would love the Roundup EO... (shouldn't go there, on me.)

---

he had no choice.

I saw the intel on his desk. He had a WMD-capable dictator in active liaison with AQ while we were still digging bodies out of the rubble in New York City.

Put all the worst-case scenarios of invasion on the table. None of them, individually or collectively, outweighed the risk of a WMD attack on an American city from a terror group who had just engaged in a spectacularly successful operation on our soil. The choice was to run the risk of an attack with 1000x or more casualties of 9/11, or run the risk of what ended up happening in Iraq.

I'm no Bushie. W had no choice.

---

I watched Powell's presentation to the UN. He made a good argument.

---

He didn't think so.

---

Such is life. I am sure he thought he could do better and he had better intel.

---

It was a scam. He should have known.

---

The piece you miss there is that he was talking with people on the ground in Saudi and those chemical weapons warnings were going off. SCUDS were landing and we were having to mask up during the war. We still had to mask up after the war was over sometimes in Kuwait depending on what was found when they were destroying weapons caches and the oil fires. It was a legitimate scare. Powell had that in his mind, so it is really not a fair look back 35 years later and say he should have known.

---

We're talking about 2003, not 1991. Those chemical weapons were long gone by then, and we had the intel to prove it. If I knew it, he should have too.

---

whiterock said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

>Not a single mention in the Epstein files
>No blackmail

He just bombed the middle east for the love of the game pic.twitter.com/bhEs2dyXei

— Kaguya’s Top Gal (@hayasaka_aryan) February 20, 2026

---

Yeah, he did. I always thought he was pissed his Dad didn't get to do it in 91. Cheney's interest for Haliburton didn't dissuade him either.

Never figured how Rumsfeld fit in, you have a better fix on the whole situation I am sure (seriously). I know Rummy would love the Roundup EO... (shouldn't go there, on me.)

---

he had no choice.

I saw the intel on his desk. He had a WMD-capable dictator in active liaison with AQ while we were still digging bodies out of the rubble in New York City.

Put all the worst-case scenarios of invasion on the table. None of them, individually or collectively, outweighed the risk of a WMD attack on an American city from a terror group who had just engaged in a spectacularly successful operation on our soil. The choice was to run the risk of an attack with 1000x or more casualties of 9/11, or run the risk of what ended up happening in Iraq.

I'm no Bushie. W had no choice.

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

>Not a single mention in the Epstein files
>No blackmail

He just bombed the middle east for the love of the game pic.twitter.com/bhEs2dyXei

— Kaguya’s Top Gal (@hayasaka_aryan) February 20, 2026

---

Yeah, he did. I always thought he was pissed his Dad didn't get to do it in 91. Cheney's interest for Haliburton didn't dissuade him either.

Never figured how Rumsfeld fit in, you have a better fix on the whole situation I am sure (seriously). I know Rummy would love the Roundup EO... (shouldn't go there, on me.)

---

he had no choice.

I saw the intel on his desk. He had a WMD-capable dictator in active liaison with AQ while we were still digging bodies out of the rubble in New York City.

Put all the worst-case scenarios of invasion on the table. None of them, individually or collectively, outweighed the risk of a WMD attack on an American city from a terror group who had just engaged in a spectacularly successful operation on our soil. The choice was to run the risk of an attack with 1000x or more casualties of 9/11, or run the risk of what ended up happening in Iraq.

I'm no Bushie. W had no choice.

---

I watched Powell's presentation to the UN. He made a good argument.

---

He didn't think so.

---

Such is life. I am sure he thought he could do better and he had better intel.

---

It was a scam. He should have known.

---

The piece you miss there is that he was talking with people on the ground in Saudi and those chemical weapons warnings were going off. SCUDS were landing and we were having to mask up during the war. We still had to mask up after the war was over sometimes in Kuwait depending on what was found when they were destroying weapons caches and the oil fires. It was a legitimate scare. Powell had that in his mind, so it is really not a fair look back 35 years later and say he should have known.

---

We're talking about 2003, not 1991. Those chemical weapons were long gone by then, and we had the intel to prove it. If I knew it, he should have too.

---

Think of it as a criminal history, it is relevant. He gassed his own people in Iran-Iraq war, he had chemical weapons in the Gulf War and he unleashed the worst environmental damage in history setting the oil fires. (as someone that saw them and sky burn bright orange for months, the coverage in US did not do them justice ) Sorry, the benefit of the doubt here goes to W. Whiterock is correct, a WMD in an American City would have been catastrophic. I do not think it would be nukes, but either chem or bio.

If Iran still has the capability, it has to be destroyed.

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

whiterock said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

>Not a single mention in the Epstein files
>No blackmail

He just bombed the middle east for the love of the game pic.twitter.com/bhEs2dyXei

— Kaguya’s Top Gal (@hayasaka_aryan) February 20, 2026

---

Yeah, he did. I always thought he was pissed his Dad didn't get to do it in 91. Cheney's interest for Haliburton didn't dissuade him either.

Never figured how Rumsfeld fit in, you have a better fix on the whole situation I am sure (seriously). I know Rummy would love the Roundup EO... (shouldn't go there, on me.)

---

he had no choice.

I saw the intel on his desk. He had a WMD-capable dictator in active liaison with AQ while we were still digging bodies out of the rubble in New York City.

Put all the worst-case scenarios of invasion on the table. None of them, individually or collectively, outweighed the risk of a WMD attack on an American city from a terror group who had just engaged in a spectacularly successful operation on our soil. The choice was to run the risk of an attack with 1000x or more casualties of 9/11, or run the risk of what ended up happening in Iraq.

I'm no Bushie. W had no choice.

---

Who provided that false intel that Sadaam had or was working toward nuclear weapons?

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

>Not a single mention in the Epstein files
>No blackmail

He just bombed the middle east for the love of the game pic.twitter.com/bhEs2dyXei

— Kaguya’s Top Gal (@hayasaka_aryan) February 20, 2026

---

Yeah, he did. I always thought he was pissed his Dad didn't get to do it in 91. Cheney's interest for Haliburton didn't dissuade him either.

Never figured how Rumsfeld fit in, you have a better fix on the whole situation I am sure (seriously). I know Rummy would love the Roundup EO... (shouldn't go there, on me.)

---

he had no choice.

I saw the intel on his desk. He had a WMD-capable dictator in active liaison with AQ while we were still digging bodies out of the rubble in New York City.

Put all the worst-case scenarios of invasion on the table. None of them, individually or collectively, outweighed the risk of a WMD attack on an American city from a terror group who had just engaged in a spectacularly successful operation on our soil. The choice was to run the risk of an attack with 1000x or more casualties of 9/11, or run the risk of what ended up happening in Iraq.

I'm no Bushie. W had no choice.

---

I watched Powell's presentation to the UN. He made a good argument.

---

He didn't think so.

---

Such is life. I am sure he thought he could do better and he had better intel.

---

It was a scam. He should have known.

---

The piece you miss there is that he was talking with people on the ground in Saudi and those chemical weapons warnings were going off. SCUDS were landing and we were having to mask up during the war. We still had to mask up after the war was over sometimes in Kuwait depending on what was found when they were destroying weapons caches and the oil fires. It was a legitimate scare. Powell had that in his mind, so it is really not a fair look back 35 years later and say he should have known.

---

We're talking about 2003, not 1991. Those chemical weapons were long gone by then, and we had the intel to prove it. If I knew it, he should have too.

---

Think of it as a criminal history, it is relevant. He gassed his own people in Iran-Iraq war, he had chemical weapons in the Gulf War and he unleashed the worst environmental damage in history setting the oil fires. (as someone that saw them and sky burn bright orange for months, the coverage in US did not do them justice ) Sorry, the benefit of the doubt here goes to W. Whiterock is correct, a WMD in an American City would have been catastrophic. I do not think it would be nukes, but either chem or bio.

If Iran still has the capability, it has to be destroyed.

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

whiterock said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

>Not a single mention in the Epstein files
>No blackmail

He just bombed the middle east for the love of the game pic.twitter.com/bhEs2dyXei

— Kaguya’s Top Gal (@hayasaka_aryan) February 20, 2026

---

Yeah, he did. I always thought he was pissed his Dad didn't get to do it in 91. Cheney's interest for Haliburton didn't dissuade him either.

Never figured how Rumsfeld fit in, you have a better fix on the whole situation I am sure (seriously). I know Rummy would love the Roundup EO... (shouldn't go there, on me.)

---

he had no choice.

I saw the intel on his desk. He had a WMD-capable dictator in active liaison with AQ while we were still digging bodies out of the rubble in New York City.

Put all the worst-case scenarios of invasion on the table. None of them, individually or collectively, outweighed the risk of a WMD attack on an American city from a terror group who had just engaged in a spectacularly successful operation on our soil. The choice was to run the risk of an attack with 1000x or more casualties of 9/11, or run the risk of what ended up happening in Iraq.

I'm no Bushie. W had no choice.

---

Who provided that false intel that Sadaam had or was working toward nuclear weapons?

---

IIRC, it was chem/bio. Wasn't there a defector that collaborated?

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

whiterock said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

>Not a single mention in the Epstein files
>No blackmail

He just bombed the middle east for the love of the game pic.twitter.com/bhEs2dyXei

— Kaguya’s Top Gal (@hayasaka_aryan) February 20, 2026

---

Yeah, he did. I always thought he was pissed his Dad didn't get to do it in 91. Cheney's interest for Haliburton didn't dissuade him either.

Never figured how Rumsfeld fit in, you have a better fix on the whole situation I am sure (seriously). I know Rummy would love the Roundup EO... (shouldn't go there, on me.)

---

he had no choice.

I saw the intel on his desk. He had a WMD-capable dictator in active liaison with AQ while we were still digging bodies out of the rubble in New York City.

Put all the worst-case scenarios of invasion on the table. None of them, individually or collectively, outweighed the risk of a WMD attack on an American city from a terror group who had just engaged in a spectacularly successful operation on our soil. The choice was to run the risk of an attack with 1000x or more casualties of 9/11, or run the risk of what ended up happening in Iraq.

I'm no Bushie. W had no choice.

---

Who provided that false intel that Sadaam had or was working toward nuclear weapons?

---

IIRC, it was chem/bio. Wasn't there a defector that collaborated?

---

whiterock said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

He did not have the weapons our intelligence told the world he had, plain and simple. Invoking Article 5 meant not only our son's and daughters died, not to mention half a million civilians... but the sons and daughters of our allies.

War is always a choice. To pretend hands were tied is a lame attempt at avoiding responsibility.

And if we invade Iran, at least Trump will likely not make up reasons. He will just say we had to do it for our sake and Israel's. It will be the end of MAGA, but I do think he will be honest.

---

Thank you for stating the fallacy so clearly. The size of his inventory mattered not. Iraq did possess the ability to manufacture and use them, as they had done so previously.

---

Porteroso said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

He did not have the weapons our intelligence told the world he had, plain and simple. Invoking Article 5 meant not only our son's and daughters died, not to mention half a million civilians... but the sons and daughters of our allies.

War is always a choice. To pretend hands were tied is a lame attempt at avoiding responsibility.

And if we invade Iran, at least Trump will likely not make up reasons. He will just say we had to do it for our sake and Israel's. It will be the end of MAGA, but I do think he will be honest.

---

Thank you for stating the fallacy so clearly. The size of his inventory mattered not. Iraq did possess the ability to manufacture and use them, as they had done so previously.

---

They did not have the capability to produce the weapons they were accused of having. So no. Try again.

---

All U.S. aid to Israel is illegal according to U.S. law!

(Somehow this clip disappeared from our timeline.) pic.twitter.com/YoFI6rWcWj

— AZAPAC (@AntiZioAmPAC) February 23, 2026

BREAKING: 🚨 🇮🇱 🇮🇷 An ANCIENT 2,780-year-old Israelite tablet has finally been restored and translated.

It reads: “Iran is only weeks away from developing a nuclear weapon.” pic.twitter.com/2MXzWxjqUF

— ADAM (@AdameMedia) February 23, 2026

Neocons increasingly nervous that Trump won't strike Iran. https://t.co/ul4FRe3zCr

— Jack Hunter (@jackhunter74) February 23, 2026

Mothra said:

---

Do you believe Iran to be a terrorist state? Do you believe it to be run by Islamists? Just FYI, most of the free world believe so and there's plenty of evidence for it. Or is that a position you don't subscribe because they share with you a common enemy?

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

BREAKING: 🚨 🇮🇱 🇮🇷 An ANCIENT 2,780-year-old Israelite tablet has finally been restored and translated.

It reads: “Iran is only weeks away from developing a nuclear weapon.” pic.twitter.com/2MXzWxjqUF

— ADAM (@AdameMedia) February 23, 2026

---

Quick question, why is Iran's nuclear program an issue? Trump told us it was destroyed by the most perfect military strike ever undertaken. So, there must be no risk of nukes in Iran. Or did I miss something?

'Totally obliterated': Full text of Trump's speech after US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities | The Times of Israel

---

The USS Gerald Ford is on it's way to the Middle East but has had to dock in Greece due to the vessel being overwhelmed with running sewage throughout the decks.

Why?

The crew are putting t-shirts and socks down the toilets as they fear the vessel is being set up to be sunk to… pic.twitter.com/NzWw03i0kg

— UNN (@UnityNewsNet) February 24, 2026

muddybrazos said:

---

The USS Gerald Ford is on it's way to the Middle East but has had to dock in Greece due to the vessel being overwhelmed with running sewage throughout the decks.

Why?

The crew are putting t-shirts and socks down the toilets as they fear the vessel is being set up to be sunk to… pic.twitter.com/NzWw03i0kg

— UNN (@UnityNewsNet) February 24, 2026

" The crew are putting t-shirts and socks down the toilets as they fear the vessel is being set up to be sunk to start a war on behalf of 'israel' with Iran."

---

Israel has HUNDREDS of nuclear weapons.

So threatening Iran over its peaceful nuclear energy program is ABSURD.

I confronted John Kirby of the US State Department over this... WATCH! pic.twitter.com/tNcpyzXE50

— Caleb T. Maupin (@RealCalebMaupin) February 22, 2026