Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

5/27/1907 - President Theodore Roosevelt reserved a strip of land on the southern US border as necessary for border security. 60 FEET of land was allocated (excluding that land which was already lawfully owned). There is NO CLAIM by left that the government will be taking land to build the wall.

---

You're thinking of the land sought by Bush for the fence.

"But much of the land the Bush administration requested was already owned by the federal government, said Gerald S. Dickinson, an assistant professor of law at the University of Pittsburgh who focuses on land use and constitutional law. The wall Trump wants to build would be different, he said."

---

10% of TX has a fence vs 80-90% for the other three states. Need a wall all over the Big Bend National Park.

That is the most unguarded part of the border by far. No fencing for about 500 miles from El Paso, TX to Laredo, TX.

2000+ crossing per day.

---

Yeah, this isn't about fence v wall. You alleged the state already owns this property. It doesn't. It will take land away from owners.

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

5/27/1907 - President Theodore Roosevelt reserved a strip of land on the southern US border as necessary for border security. 60 FEET of land was allocated (excluding that land which was already lawfully owned). There is NO CLAIM by left that the government will be taking land to build the wall.

---

You're thinking of the land sought by Bush for the fence.

"But much of the land the Bush administration requested was already owned by the federal government, said Gerald S. Dickinson, an assistant professor of law at the University of Pittsburgh who focuses on land use and constitutional law. The wall Trump wants to build would be different, he said."

---

10% of TX has a fence vs 80-90% for the other three states. Need a wall all over the Big Bend National Park.

That is the most unguarded part of the border by far. No fencing for about 500 miles from El Paso, TX to Laredo, TX.

2000+ crossing per day.

---

Yeah, this isn't about fence v wall. You alleged the state already owns this property. It doesn't. It will take land away from owners.

---

Happens all the time. See Cowboys stadium.

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

5/27/1907 - President Theodore Roosevelt reserved a strip of land on the southern US border as necessary for border security. 60 FEET of land was allocated (excluding that land which was already lawfully owned). There is NO CLAIM by left that the government will be taking land to build the wall.

---

You're thinking of the land sought by Bush for the fence.

"But much of the land the Bush administration requested was already owned by the federal government, said Gerald S. Dickinson, an assistant professor of law at the University of Pittsburgh who focuses on land use and constitutional law. The wall Trump wants to build would be different, he said."

---

10% of TX has a fence vs 80-90% for the other three states. Need a wall all over the Big Bend National Park.

That is the most unguarded part of the border by far. No fencing for about 500 miles from El Paso, TX to Laredo, TX.

2000+ crossing per day.

---

Yeah, this isn't about fence v wall. You alleged the state already owns this property. It doesn't. It will take land away from owners.

---

Happens all the time. See Cowboys stadium.

---

Doesn't make it right. But it is a favored statist technique.

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

5/27/1907 - President Theodore Roosevelt reserved a strip of land on the southern US border as necessary for border security. 60 FEET of land was allocated (excluding that land which was already lawfully owned). There is NO CLAIM by left that the government will be taking land to build the wall.

---

You're thinking of the land sought by Bush for the fence.

"But much of the land the Bush administration requested was already owned by the federal government, said Gerald S. Dickinson, an assistant professor of law at the University of Pittsburgh who focuses on land use and constitutional law. The wall Trump wants to build would be different, he said."

---

10% of TX has a fence vs 80-90% for the other three states. Need a wall all over the Big Bend National Park.

That is the most unguarded part of the border by far. No fencing for about 500 miles from El Paso, TX to Laredo, TX.

2000+ crossing per day.

---

Yeah, this isn't about fence v wall. You alleged the state already owns this property. It doesn't. It will take land away from owners.

---

Happens all the time. See Cowboys stadium.

---

Doesn't make it right. But it is a favored statist technique.

---

Cool. You live in a state controlled country...you just now realizing that?

All the power we have is using the state at this point, and even that isn't much power.

You're crazy if you think the puppetmasters of the country will get us away from the binary system.

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

5/27/1907 - President Theodore Roosevelt reserved a strip of land on the southern US border as necessary for border security. 60 FEET of land was allocated (excluding that land which was already lawfully owned). There is NO CLAIM by left that the government will be taking land to build the wall.

---

You're thinking of the land sought by Bush for the fence.

"But much of the land the Bush administration requested was already owned by the federal government, said Gerald S. Dickinson, an assistant professor of law at the University of Pittsburgh who focuses on land use and constitutional law. The wall Trump wants to build would be different, he said."

---

10% of TX has a fence vs 80-90% for the other three states. Need a wall all over the Big Bend National Park.

That is the most unguarded part of the border by far. No fencing for about 500 miles from El Paso, TX to Laredo, TX.

2000+ crossing per day.

---

Yeah, this isn't about fence v wall. You alleged the state already owns this property. It doesn't. It will take land away from owners.

---

Happens all the time. See Cowboys stadium.

---

Doesn't make it right. But it is a favored statist technique.

---

Cool. You live in a state controlled country...you just now realizing that?

All the power we have is using the state at this point, and even that isn't much power.

You're crazy if you think the puppetmasters of the country will get us away from the binary system.

---

I do not believe that statists like you are going to win the day. I have far more trust in our democratic institutions. America was always great.

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

5/27/1907 - President Theodore Roosevelt reserved a strip of land on the southern US border as necessary for border security. 60 FEET of land was allocated (excluding that land which was already lawfully owned). There is NO CLAIM by left that the government will be taking land to build the wall.

---

You're thinking of the land sought by Bush for the fence.

"But much of the land the Bush administration requested was already owned by the federal government, said Gerald S. Dickinson, an assistant professor of law at the University of Pittsburgh who focuses on land use and constitutional law. The wall Trump wants to build would be different, he said."

---

10% of TX has a fence vs 80-90% for the other three states. Need a wall all over the Big Bend National Park.

That is the most unguarded part of the border by far. No fencing for about 500 miles from El Paso, TX to Laredo, TX.

2000+ crossing per day.

---

Yeah, this isn't about fence v wall. You alleged the state already owns this property. It doesn't. It will take land away from owners.

---

Happens all the time. See Cowboys stadium.

---

Doesn't make it right. But it is a favored statist technique.

---

Cool. You live in a state controlled country...you just now realizing that?

All the power we have is using the state at this point, and even that isn't much power.

You're crazy if you think the puppetmasters of the country will get us away from the binary system.

---

I do not believe that statists like you are going to win the day. I have far more trust in our democratic institutions. America was always great.

---

Quash, you remind me of some angry little obama loving ex Black Lives Matter marcher now forced to stay off streets by a big bad Trumpian America and now you're stuck with your lone laptop in mommy and daddy's basement unemployable with huge college debt getting high as much as you can in between naps

Wasted worthless mindless youth

You shower once a week whether you need it or

Worse yet, Cinque has accomplished only about half of what you have and Waco is increasingly mentally ill

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

5/27/1907 - President Theodore Roosevelt reserved a strip of land on the southern US border as necessary for border security. 60 FEET of land was allocated (excluding that land which was already lawfully owned). There is NO CLAIM by left that the government will be taking land to build the wall.

---

You're thinking of the land sought by Bush for the fence.

"But much of the land the Bush administration requested was already owned by the federal government, said Gerald S. Dickinson, an assistant professor of law at the University of Pittsburgh who focuses on land use and constitutional law. The wall Trump wants to build would be different, he said."

---

10% of TX has a fence vs 80-90% for the other three states. Need a wall all over the Big Bend National Park.

That is the most unguarded part of the border by far. No fencing for about 500 miles from El Paso, TX to Laredo, TX.

2000+ crossing per day.

---

Yeah, this isn't about fence v wall. You alleged the state already owns this property. It doesn't. It will take land away from owners.

---

Happens all the time. See Cowboys stadium.

---

Doesn't make it right. But it is a favored statist technique.

---

Cool. You live in a state controlled country...you just now realizing that?

All the power we have is using the state at this point, and even that isn't much power.

You're crazy if you think the puppetmasters of the country will get us away from the binary system.

---

I do not believe that statists like you are going to win the day. I have far more trust in our democratic institutions. America was always great.

---

Democratic institutions are controlled by statists.

America was hijacked.

Florda_mike said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

5/27/1907 - President Theodore Roosevelt reserved a strip of land on the southern US border as necessary for border security. 60 FEET of land was allocated (excluding that land which was already lawfully owned). There is NO CLAIM by left that the government will be taking land to build the wall.

---

You're thinking of the land sought by Bush for the fence.

"But much of the land the Bush administration requested was already owned by the federal government, said Gerald S. Dickinson, an assistant professor of law at the University of Pittsburgh who focuses on land use and constitutional law. The wall Trump wants to build would be different, he said."

---

10% of TX has a fence vs 80-90% for the other three states. Need a wall all over the Big Bend National Park.

That is the most unguarded part of the border by far. No fencing for about 500 miles from El Paso, TX to Laredo, TX.

2000+ crossing per day.

---

Yeah, this isn't about fence v wall. You alleged the state already owns this property. It doesn't. It will take land away from owners.

---

Happens all the time. See Cowboys stadium.

---

Doesn't make it right. But it is a favored statist technique.

---

Cool. You live in a state controlled country...you just now realizing that?

All the power we have is using the state at this point, and even that isn't much power.

You're crazy if you think the puppetmasters of the country will get us away from the binary system.

---

I do not believe that statists like you are going to win the day. I have far more trust in our democratic institutions. America was always great.

---

Quash, you remind me of some angry little obama loving ex Black Lives Matter marcher now forced to stay off streets by a big bad Trumpian America and now you're stuck with your lone laptop in mommy and daddy's basement unemployable with huge college debt getting high as much as you can in between naps

Wasted worthless mindless youth

You shower once a week whether you need it or

Worse yet, Cinque has accomplished only about half of what you have and Waco is increasingly mentally ill

---

You have no clue.

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

5/27/1907 - President Theodore Roosevelt reserved a strip of land on the southern US border as necessary for border security. 60 FEET of land was allocated (excluding that land which was already lawfully owned). There is NO CLAIM by left that the government will be taking land to build the wall.

---

You're thinking of the land sought by Bush for the fence.

"But much of the land the Bush administration requested was already owned by the federal government, said Gerald S. Dickinson, an assistant professor of law at the University of Pittsburgh who focuses on land use and constitutional law. The wall Trump wants to build would be different, he said."

---

10% of TX has a fence vs 80-90% for the other three states. Need a wall all over the Big Bend National Park.

That is the most unguarded part of the border by far. No fencing for about 500 miles from El Paso, TX to Laredo, TX.

2000+ crossing per day.

---

Yeah, this isn't about fence v wall. You alleged the state already owns this property. It doesn't. It will take land away from owners.

---

Happens all the time. See Cowboys stadium.

---

Doesn't make it right. But it is a favored statist technique.

---

Cool. You live in a state controlled country...you just now realizing that?

All the power we have is using the state at this point, and even that isn't much power.

You're crazy if you think the puppetmasters of the country will get us away from the binary system.

---

I do not believe that statists like you are going to win the day. I have far more trust in our democratic institutions. America was always great.

---

Democratic institutions are controlled by statists.

America was hijacked.

---

I am truly sorry you got so cynical so young.

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

5/27/1907 - President Theodore Roosevelt reserved a strip of land on the southern US border as necessary for border security. 60 FEET of land was allocated (excluding that land which was already lawfully owned). There is NO CLAIM by left that the government will be taking land to build the wall.

---

You're thinking of the land sought by Bush for the fence.

"But much of the land the Bush administration requested was already owned by the federal government, said Gerald S. Dickinson, an assistant professor of law at the University of Pittsburgh who focuses on land use and constitutional law. The wall Trump wants to build would be different, he said."

---

10% of TX has a fence vs 80-90% for the other three states. Need a wall all over the Big Bend National Park.

That is the most unguarded part of the border by far. No fencing for about 500 miles from El Paso, TX to Laredo, TX.

2000+ crossing per day.

---

Yeah, this isn't about fence v wall. You alleged the state already owns this property. It doesn't. It will take land away from owners.

---

Happens all the time. See Cowboys stadium.

---

Doesn't make it right. But it is a favored statist technique.

---

Cool. You live in a state controlled country...you just now realizing that?

All the power we have is using the state at this point, and even that isn't much power.

You're crazy if you think the puppetmasters of the country will get us away from the binary system.

---

I do not believe that statists like you are going to win the day. I have far more trust in our democratic institutions. America was always great.

---

Democratic institutions are controlled by statists.

America was hijacked.

---

I am truly sorry you got so cynical so young.

---

It's the truth. Congress is controlled by lobbyists, whips and leaders.
Greedy people who have access to info you don't, legal protection you don't have and money you can't have.

It's a big party and you ain't in it.

There's nothing that can be done about it.

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

5/27/1907 - President Theodore Roosevelt reserved a strip of land on the southern US border as necessary for border security. 60 FEET of land was allocated (excluding that land which was already lawfully owned). There is NO CLAIM by left that the government will be taking land to build the wall.

---

You're thinking of the land sought by Bush for the fence.

"But much of the land the Bush administration requested was already owned by the federal government, said Gerald S. Dickinson, an assistant professor of law at the University of Pittsburgh who focuses on land use and constitutional law. The wall Trump wants to build would be different, he said."

---

10% of TX has a fence vs 80-90% for the other three states. Need a wall all over the Big Bend National Park.

That is the most unguarded part of the border by far. No fencing for about 500 miles from El Paso, TX to Laredo, TX.

2000+ crossing per day.

---

Yeah, this isn't about fence v wall. You alleged the state already owns this property. It doesn't. It will take land away from owners.

---

Happens all the time. See Cowboys stadium.

---

Doesn't make it right. But it is a favored statist technique.

---

Cool. You live in a state controlled country...you just now realizing that?

All the power we have is using the state at this point, and even that isn't much power.

You're crazy if you think the puppetmasters of the country will get us away from the binary system.

---

I do not believe that statists like you are going to win the day. I have far more trust in our democratic institutions. America was always great.

---

Democratic institutions are controlled by statists.

America was hijacked.

---

I am truly sorry you got so cynical so young.

---

It's the truth. Congress is controlled by lobbyists, whips and leaders.
Greedy people who have access to info you don't, legal protection you don't have and money you can't have.

It's a big party and you ain't in it.

There's nothing that can be done about it.

---

Except to sing for a rock n' roll band...

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

I do not believe that statists like you are going to win the day. I have far more trust in our democratic institutions. America was always great.

---

Democratic institutions are controlled by statists.

America was hijacked.

---

I am truly sorry you got so cynical so young.

---

It's the truth. Congress is controlled by lobbyists, whips and leaders.
Greedy people who have access to info you don't, legal protection you don't have and money you can't have.

It's a big party and you ain't in it.

There's nothing that can be done about it.

---

I disagree with the last part. The problem is government's size and inertia, which also makes it very, very hard to get it to change course, but it can be done, and is done from time to time.

The need is for us to find the combination of a truly honorable, brilliant and charismatic leader at the same time the public is receptive to the idea. We need another James Polk, another Grover Cleveland, or another Reagan but this time with a GOP majority behind him.

Florda_mike said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

I do not believe that statists like you are going to win the day. I have far more trust in our democratic institutions. America was always great.

---

Democratic institutions are controlled by statists.

America was hijacked.

---

I am truly sorry you got so cynical so young.

---

It's the truth. Congress is controlled by lobbyists, whips and leaders.
Greedy people who have access to info you don't, legal protection you don't have and money you can't have.

It's a big party and you ain't in it.

There's nothing that can be done about it.

---

I disagree with the last part. The problem is government's size and inertia, which also makes it very, very hard to get it to change course, but it can be done, and is done from time to time.

The need is for us to find the combination of a truly honorable, brilliant and charismatic leader at the same time the public is receptive to the idea. We need another James Polk, another Grover Cleveland, or another Reagan but this time with a GOP majority behind him.

---

Drain The Swamp! Build That Wall!

---

Dam strate

---

Trump has walled in the swamp.

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

I do not believe that statists like you are going to win the day. I have far more trust in our democratic institutions. America was always great.

---

Democratic institutions are controlled by statists.

America was hijacked.

---

I am truly sorry you got so cynical so young.

---

It's the truth. Congress is controlled by lobbyists, whips and leaders.
Greedy people who have access to info you don't, legal protection you don't have and money you can't have.

It's a big party and you ain't in it.

There's nothing that can be done about it.

---

I disagree with the last part. The problem is government's size and inertia, which also makes it very, very hard to get it to change course, but it can be done, and is done from time to time.

The need is for us to find the combination of a truly honorable, brilliant and charismatic leader at the same time the public is receptive to the idea. We need another James Polk, another Grover Cleveland, or another Reagan but this time with a GOP majority behind him.

---

Drain The Swamp! Build That Wall!

---

Dam strate

---

Trump has walled in the swamp.

---

There's truth to that....first US president since the late 1940s to meet a Korean leader despite what the swamp advises.

YoakDaddy said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

I do not believe that statists like you are going to win the day. I have far more trust in our democratic institutions. America was always great.

---

Democratic institutions are controlled by statists.

America was hijacked.

---

I am truly sorry you got so cynical so young.

---

It's the truth. Congress is controlled by lobbyists, whips and leaders.
Greedy people who have access to info you don't, legal protection you don't have and money you can't have.

It's a big party and you ain't in it.

There's nothing that can be done about it.

---

I disagree with the last part. The problem is government's size and inertia, which also makes it very, very hard to get it to change course, but it can be done, and is done from time to time.

The need is for us to find the combination of a truly honorable, brilliant and charismatic leader at the same time the public is receptive to the idea. We need another James Polk, another Grover Cleveland, or another Reagan but this time with a GOP majority behind him.

---

Drain The Swamp! Build That Wall!

---

Dam strate

---

Trump has walled in the swamp.

---

There's truth to that....first US president since the late 1940s to meet a Korean leader despite what the swamp advises.

---

Still waiting for the US to get something besides fake promises.

corncob pipe said:

---

quash said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

I do not believe that statists like you are going to win the day. I have far more trust in our democratic institutions. America was always great.

---

Democratic institutions are controlled by statists.

America was hijacked.

---

I am truly sorry you got so cynical so young.

---

It's the truth. Congress is controlled by lobbyists, whips and leaders.
Greedy people who have access to info you don't, legal protection you don't have and money you can't have.

It's a big party and you ain't in it.

There's nothing that can be done about it.

---

I disagree with the last part. The problem is government's size and inertia, which also makes it very, very hard to get it to change course, but it can be done, and is done from time to time.

The need is for us to find the combination of a truly honorable, brilliant and charismatic leader at the same time the public is receptive to the idea. We need another James Polk, another Grover Cleveland, or another Reagan but this time with a GOP majority behind him.

---

Drain The Swamp! Build That Wall!

---

Dam strate

---

Trump has walled in the swamp.

---

There's truth to that....first US president since the late 1940s to meet a Korean leader despite what the swamp advises.

---

Still waiting for the US to get something besides fake promises.

---

well then.. Your President shares your viewpoint exactly

---

He should act like it. No more shart of the deal.

corncob pipe said:

---

quash said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

I do not believe that statists like you are going to win the day. I have far more trust in our democratic institutions. America was always great.

---

Democratic institutions are controlled by statists.

America was hijacked.

---

I am truly sorry you got so cynical so young.

---

It's the truth. Congress is controlled by lobbyists, whips and leaders.
Greedy people who have access to info you don't, legal protection you don't have and money you can't have.

It's a big party and you ain't in it.

There's nothing that can be done about it.

---

I disagree with the last part. The problem is government's size and inertia, which also makes it very, very hard to get it to change course, but it can be done, and is done from time to time.

The need is for us to find the combination of a truly honorable, brilliant and charismatic leader at the same time the public is receptive to the idea. We need another James Polk, another Grover Cleveland, or another Reagan but this time with a GOP majority behind him.

---

Drain The Swamp! Build That Wall!

---

Dam strate

---

Trump has walled in the swamp.

---

There's truth to that....first US president since the late 1940s to meet a Korean leader despite what the swamp advises.

---

Still waiting for the US to get something besides fake promises.

---

well then.. Your President shares your viewpoint exactly

---

You just got owned bro ^^^^^

quash said:

---

corncob pipe said:

---

quash said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

I do not believe that statists like you are going to win the day. I have far more trust in our democratic institutions. America was always great.

---

Democratic institutions are controlled by statists.

America was hijacked.

---

I am truly sorry you got so cynical so young.

---

It's the truth. Congress is controlled by lobbyists, whips and leaders.
Greedy people who have access to info you don't, legal protection you don't have and money you can't have.

It's a big party and you ain't in it.

There's nothing that can be done about it.

---

I disagree with the last part. The problem is government's size and inertia, which also makes it very, very hard to get it to change course, but it can be done, and is done from time to time.

The need is for us to find the combination of a truly honorable, brilliant and charismatic leader at the same time the public is receptive to the idea. We need another James Polk, another Grover Cleveland, or another Reagan but this time with a GOP majority behind him.

---

Drain The Swamp! Build That Wall!

---

Dam strate

---

Trump has walled in the swamp.

---

There's truth to that....first US president since the late 1940s to meet a Korean leader despite what the swamp advises.

---

Still waiting for the US to get something besides fake promises.

---

well then.. Your President shares your viewpoint exactly

---

He should act like it. No more shart of the deal.

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

corncob pipe said:

---

quash said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

I do not believe that statists like you are going to win the day. I have far more trust in our democratic institutions. America was always great.

---

Democratic institutions are controlled by statists.

America was hijacked.

---

I am truly sorry you got so cynical so young.

---

It's the truth. Congress is controlled by lobbyists, whips and leaders.
Greedy people who have access to info you don't, legal protection you don't have and money you can't have.

It's a big party and you ain't in it.

There's nothing that can be done about it.

---

I disagree with the last part. The problem is government's size and inertia, which also makes it very, very hard to get it to change course, but it can be done, and is done from time to time.

The need is for us to find the combination of a truly honorable, brilliant and charismatic leader at the same time the public is receptive to the idea. We need another James Polk, another Grover Cleveland, or another Reagan but this time with a GOP majority behind him.

---

Drain The Swamp! Build That Wall!

---

Dam strate

---

Trump has walled in the swamp.

---

There's truth to that....first US president since the late 1940s to meet a Korean leader despite what the swamp advises.

---

Still waiting for the US to get something besides fake promises.

---

well then.. Your President shares your viewpoint exactly

---

He should act like it. No more shart of the deal.

---

---

What concessions have we made? What did we get?

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

corncob pipe said:

---

quash said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

I do not believe that statists like you are going to win the day. I have far more trust in our democratic institutions. America was always great.

---

Democratic institutions are controlled by statists.

America was hijacked.

---

I am truly sorry you got so cynical so young.

---

It's the truth. Congress is controlled by lobbyists, whips and leaders.
Greedy people who have access to info you don't, legal protection you don't have and money you can't have.

It's a big party and you ain't in it.

There's nothing that can be done about it.

---

I disagree with the last part. The problem is government's size and inertia, which also makes it very, very hard to get it to change course, but it can be done, and is done from time to time.

The need is for us to find the combination of a truly honorable, brilliant and charismatic leader at the same time the public is receptive to the idea. We need another James Polk, another Grover Cleveland, or another Reagan but this time with a GOP majority behind him.

---

Drain The Swamp! Build That Wall!

---

Dam strate

---

Trump has walled in the swamp.

---

There's truth to that....first US president since the late 1940s to meet a Korean leader despite what the swamp advises.

---

Still waiting for the US to get something besides fake promises.

---

well then.. Your President shares your viewpoint exactly

---

He should act like it. No more shart of the deal.

---

---

What concessions have we made? What did we get?

---

Actual dialogue to begin with. Peace talks. Trade talks.
Now the effort is denuclearization and it's looking pretty good.

Are you really thinking the D.C. establishment wouldn't pursue war?

For being a libertarian, you sure don't recognize when politicians are breaking the establishment status quo.

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

corncob pipe said:

---

quash said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

I do not believe that statists like you are going to win the day. I have far more trust in our democratic institutions. America was always great.

---

Democratic institutions are controlled by statists.

America was hijacked.

---

I am truly sorry you got so cynical so young.

---

It's the truth. Congress is controlled by lobbyists, whips and leaders.
Greedy people who have access to info you don't, legal protection you don't have and money you can't have.

It's a big party and you ain't in it.

There's nothing that can be done about it.

---

I disagree with the last part. The problem is government's size and inertia, which also makes it very, very hard to get it to change course, but it can be done, and is done from time to time.

The need is for us to find the combination of a truly honorable, brilliant and charismatic leader at the same time the public is receptive to the idea. We need another James Polk, another Grover Cleveland, or another Reagan but this time with a GOP majority behind him.

---

Drain The Swamp! Build That Wall!

---

Dam strate

---

Trump has walled in the swamp.

---

There's truth to that....first US president since the late 1940s to meet a Korean leader despite what the swamp advises.

---

Still waiting for the US to get something besides fake promises.

---

well then.. Your President shares your viewpoint exactly

---

He should act like it. No more shart of the deal.

---

---

What concessions have we made? What did we get?

---

Actual dialogue to begin with. Peace talks. Trade talks.
Now the effort is denuclearization and it's looking pretty good.

Are you really thinking the D.C. establishment wouldn't pursue war?

For being a libertarian, you sure don't recognize when politicians are breaking the establishment status quo.

---

I'll recognize it when I see it. What you have are talks and talks. Swamp 101.

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

corncob pipe said:

---

quash said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

I do not believe that statists like you are going to win the day. I have far more trust in our democratic institutions. America was always great.

---

Democratic institutions are controlled by statists.

America was hijacked.

---

I am truly sorry you got so cynical so young.

---

It's the truth. Congress is controlled by lobbyists, whips and leaders.
Greedy people who have access to info you don't, legal protection you don't have and money you can't have.

It's a big party and you ain't in it.

There's nothing that can be done about it.

---

I disagree with the last part. The problem is government's size and inertia, which also makes it very, very hard to get it to change course, but it can be done, and is done from time to time.

The need is for us to find the combination of a truly honorable, brilliant and charismatic leader at the same time the public is receptive to the idea. We need another James Polk, another Grover Cleveland, or another Reagan but this time with a GOP majority behind him.

---

Drain The Swamp! Build That Wall!

---

Dam strate

---

Trump has walled in the swamp.

---

There's truth to that....first US president since the late 1940s to meet a Korean leader despite what the swamp advises.

---

Still waiting for the US to get something besides fake promises.

---

well then.. Your President shares your viewpoint exactly

---

He should act like it. No more shart of the deal.

---

---

What concessions have we made? What did we get?

---

Actual dialogue to begin with. Peace talks. Trade talks.
Now the effort is denuclearization and it's looking pretty good.

Are you really thinking the D.C. establishment wouldn't pursue war?

For being a libertarian, you sure don't recognize when politicians are breaking the establishment status quo.

---

I'll recognize it when I see it. What you have are talks and talks. Swamp 101.

---

It's sad that you fail to recognize that it is both parties who despise Trump.

he's the one liberal on here that shows signs of being able to reason.. but then that defective TDS genome shows itself

basically he's the brightest Zombie

corncob pipe said:

---

he's the one liberal on here that shows signs of being able to reason.. but then that defective TDS genome shows itself

basically he's the brightest Zombie

---

I don't think he wants to take the red pill.

Recognizing that nearly all of the D.C. upper echelon is just one giant party of greed against the American people is hard to stomach.

No nuke testing by North Korea in almost 2 years, something no previous President accomplished

Meetings between North and South Korean representatives to discuss restoring relations, also unprecedented since 1960

Return of US POW remains from North Korea, also unprecedented

Not sure why anyone would ignore those accomplishments

Oldbear83 said:

---

No nuke testing by North Korea in almost 2 years, something no previous President accomplished

Meetings between North and South Korean representatives to discuss restoring relations, also unprecedented since 1960

Return of US POW remains from North Korea, also unprecedented

Not sure why anyone would ignore those accomplishments

---

Because orange man bad.

Oldbear83 said:

---

Not sure why anyone would ignore those accomplishments

---

Because the Cohen dog and pony show was on TeeVee

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

corncob pipe said:

---

quash said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

I do not believe that statists like you are going to win the day. I have far more trust in our democratic institutions. America was always great.

---

Democratic institutions are controlled by statists.

America was hijacked.

---

I am truly sorry you got so cynical so young.

---

It's the truth. Congress is controlled by lobbyists, whips and leaders.
Greedy people who have access to info you don't, legal protection you don't have and money you can't have.

It's a big party and you ain't in it.

There's nothing that can be done about it.

---

I disagree with the last part. The problem is government's size and inertia, which also makes it very, very hard to get it to change course, but it can be done, and is done from time to time.

The need is for us to find the combination of a truly honorable, brilliant and charismatic leader at the same time the public is receptive to the idea. We need another James Polk, another Grover Cleveland, or another Reagan but this time with a GOP majority behind him.

---

Drain The Swamp! Build That Wall!

---

Dam strate

---

Trump has walled in the swamp.

---

There's truth to that....first US president since the late 1940s to meet a Korean leader despite what the swamp advises.

---

Still waiting for the US to get something besides fake promises.

---

well then.. Your President shares your viewpoint exactly

---

He should act like it. No more shart of the deal.

---

---

What concessions have we made? What did we get?

---

Actual dialogue to begin with. Peace talks. Trade talks.
Now the effort is denuclearization and it's looking pretty good.

Are you really thinking the D.C. establishment wouldn't pursue war?

For being a libertarian, you sure don't recognize when politicians are breaking the establishment status quo.

---

You saying we didn't have actual dialogue before?

Obama was demonized for saying he'd meet without preconditions.

And in what way are things "looking good." North Korea has only INCREASED their nuclear capabilities. That's a fact.

BBL: "North Korea has only INCREASED their nuclear capabilities. That's a fact."

I don't think so. NK has destroyed two known facilities, has not conducted nuclear tests in almost two years, and has reduced their uranium stockpile by 15%.

Not sure how you read that as "increased'

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

corncob pipe said:

---

quash said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

I do not believe that statists like you are going to win the day. I have far more trust in our democratic institutions. America was always great.

---

Democratic institutions are controlled by statists.

America was hijacked.

---

I am truly sorry you got so cynical so young.

---

It's the truth. Congress is controlled by lobbyists, whips and leaders.
Greedy people who have access to info you don't, legal protection you don't have and money you can't have.

It's a big party and you ain't in it.

There's nothing that can be done about it.

---

I disagree with the last part. The problem is government's size and inertia, which also makes it very, very hard to get it to change course, but it can be done, and is done from time to time.

The need is for us to find the combination of a truly honorable, brilliant and charismatic leader at the same time the public is receptive to the idea. We need another James Polk, another Grover Cleveland, or another Reagan but this time with a GOP majority behind him.

---

Drain The Swamp! Build That Wall!

---

Dam strate

---

Trump has walled in the swamp.

---

There's truth to that....first US president since the late 1940s to meet a Korean leader despite what the swamp advises.

---

Still waiting for the US to get something besides fake promises.

---

well then.. Your President shares your viewpoint exactly

---

He should act like it. No more shart of the deal.

---

---

What concessions have we made? What did we get?

---

Actual dialogue to begin with. Peace talks. Trade talks.
Now the effort is denuclearization and it's looking pretty good.

Are you really thinking the D.C. establishment wouldn't pursue war?

For being a libertarian, you sure don't recognize when politicians are breaking the establishment status quo.

---

You saying we didn't have actual dialogue before?

Obama was demonized for saying he'd meet without preconditions.

And in what way are things "looking good." North Korea has only INCREASED their nuclear capabilities. That's a fact.

---

Obama was hostile and trigger happy. That's why he dropped more bombs than any president before him combined.

Please give me a source that NK has increased their nuclear capabilities.

Also, not every change of plans at this summit means Trump failed as you hope he does.

Doc Holliday said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

corncob pipe said:

---

quash said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

I do not believe that statists like you are going to win the day. I have far more trust in our democratic institutions. America was always great.

---

Democratic institutions are controlled by statists.

America was hijacked.

---

I am truly sorry you got so cynical so young.

---

It's the truth. Congress is controlled by lobbyists, whips and leaders.
Greedy people who have access to info you don't, legal protection you don't have and money you can't have.

It's a big party and you ain't in it.

There's nothing that can be done about it.

---

I disagree with the last part. The problem is government's size and inertia, which also makes it very, very hard to get it to change course, but it can be done, and is done from time to time.

The need is for us to find the combination of a truly honorable, brilliant and charismatic leader at the same time the public is receptive to the idea. We need another James Polk, another Grover Cleveland, or another Reagan but this time with a GOP majority behind him.

---

Drain The Swamp! Build That Wall!

---

Dam strate

---

Trump has walled in the swamp.

---

There's truth to that....first US president since the late 1940s to meet a Korean leader despite what the swamp advises.

---

Still waiting for the US to get something besides fake promises.

---

well then.. Your President shares your viewpoint exactly

---

He should act like it. No more shart of the deal.

---

---

What concessions have we made? What did we get?

---

Actual dialogue to begin with. Peace talks. Trade talks.
Now the effort is denuclearization and it's looking pretty good.

Are you really thinking the D.C. establishment wouldn't pursue war?

For being a libertarian, you sure don't recognize when politicians are breaking the establishment status quo.

---

You saying we didn't have actual dialogue before?

Obama was demonized for saying he'd meet without preconditions.

And in what way are things "looking good." North Korea has only INCREASED their nuclear capabilities. That's a fact.

---

Obama was hostile and trigger happy. That's why he dropped more bombs than any president before him combined.

Please give me a source that NK has increased their nuclear capabilities.

Also, not every change of plans at this summit means Trump failed as you hope he does.

---

They've quit testing because they don't need to anymore. They have full capabilities and haven't stopped, only gotten rid of a couple of old sites WITHOUT INSPECTIONS. So we're just taking their word for it, I guess? Sure you totally would have been cool with it if Obama had done that.

There's no unclassified proof of NK's capabilities, but there are plenty of experts who say so. Even Pompeo has come out and said as much.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2017/05/north-korea-testing-nuclear-weapons-170504072226461.html

And it's funny you say Obama was "trigger happy." You haven't met a statement you couldn't twist, have you?

He was president for 8 years and went away from conventional warfare. Eisenhower launched more missiles than FDR did. Guess that makes him more bloodthirsty.

I remember when Reagan walked away from Gorbachev at Reykjavik......the press reported nothing less than total global nuclear war being imminent.