Maybe.YoakDaddy said:TexasScientist said:
I wouldn't count on that. Trump
Is doing everything he can to limit himself to one term.
While AOC along with Nancy, Chuck, Schiff, Omar, and Tlaib are guaranteeing him a second term.
Maybe.YoakDaddy said:TexasScientist said:
I wouldn't count on that. Trump
Is doing everything he can to limit himself to one term.
While AOC along with Nancy, Chuck, Schiff, Omar, and Tlaib are guaranteeing him a second term.
Wichitabear said:
Beto is not going to win ****. Let him come down to South Texas. He has no idea what he is saying. Come and take it!!! Beto
Waco1947 said:Wichitabear said:
Beto is not going to win ****. Let him come down to South Texas. He has no idea what he is saying. Come and take it!!! Beto
Ahhhh, he's been to all the counties in Texas. He's been to all the border counties. He lives in a border city. So you're wrong.
YoakDaddy said:Waco1947 said:Wichitabear said:
Beto is not going to win ****. Let him come down to South Texas. He has no idea what he is saying. Come and take it!!! Beto
Ahhhh, he's been to all the counties in Texas. He's been to all the border counties. He lives in a border city. So you're wrong.
So what if he's been to every county. Last I saw Beto, he lost an election and was unemployed. And when he ran for senate, he didn't have the cojones to campaign on removing border protections.
BrooksBearLives said:YoakDaddy said:Waco1947 said:Wichitabear said:
Beto is not going to win ****. Let him come down to South Texas. He has no idea what he is saying. Come and take it!!! Beto
Ahhhh, he's been to all the counties in Texas. He's been to all the border counties. He lives in a border city. So you're wrong.
So what if he's been to every county. Last I saw Beto, he lost an election and was unemployed. And when he ran for senate, he didn't have the cojones to campaign on removing border protections.
Technically, what you said is 100% true.
You're right. Republicans in Texas should just completely ignore him. Your logic is completely sound. No reason to worry AT ALL.
BrooksBearLives said:YoakDaddy said:Waco1947 said:Wichitabear said:
Beto is not going to win ****. Let him come down to South Texas. He has no idea what he is saying. Come and take it!!! Beto
Ahhhh, he's been to all the counties in Texas. He's been to all the border counties. He lives in a border city. So you're wrong.
So what if he's been to every county. Last I saw Beto, he lost an election and was unemployed. And when he ran for senate, he didn't have the cojones to campaign on removing border protections.
Technically, what you said is 100% true.
You're right. Republicans in Texas should just completely ignore him. Your logic is completely sound. No reason to worry AT ALL.
Read further. He ends up making that case for the wall...accidentally of course.quash said:fadskier said:Where is your evidence that the wall is a joke? Even Beto knows it works In El Paso. He said so himself!xiledinok said:GolemIII said:xiledinok said:
Trump is the best thing that ever happened to the Democrats.
He just jerked off the country for 54 miles of border wall that wasn't needed in the feasibility studies.
Now, here comes the courts to strike down his "emergency."
They're gonna love his SCOTUS pick to replace the corpse. Best thing ever.
Is that all you can hope?
The border wall is a joke on our wallets.
What's next? Another trillion dollar infrastructure bill to fix the non GDP producing red states' broken run down blight?
NY Post, Feb 15th:
Former Congressman and possible 2020 presidential contender Beto O'Rourke said in an interview Thursday that he would tear down an existing border barrier in El Paso, Texas, if given the chance.
"Absolutely, I'd take the wall down," O'Rourke, who represented the area as a congressman, said on MSNBC.
Separate issues that the press ran with the first narrative before waiting or investigating...BrooksBearLives said:fadskier said:
Let's see...Smollett, Covington kids, Kavanaugh, the press derserves to be threatened. Face it, the press investigates no more.
You just throwing **** at a wall? These are all separate issues.
What the **** are you even talking about? You have no idea what Beto's platform even was, it's obvious.YoakDaddy said:BrooksBearLives said:YoakDaddy said:Waco1947 said:Wichitabear said:
Beto is not going to win ****. Let him come down to South Texas. He has no idea what he is saying. Come and take it!!! Beto
Ahhhh, he's been to all the counties in Texas. He's been to all the border counties. He lives in a border city. So you're wrong.
So what if he's been to every county. Last I saw Beto, he lost an election and was unemployed. And when he ran for senate, he didn't have the cojones to campaign on removing border protections.
Technically, what you said is 100% true.
You're right. Republicans in Texas should just completely ignore him. Your logic is completely sound. No reason to worry AT ALL.
I never said ignore. Thats your comment. If he'd have stated that 6 months ago when he was running, he'd have never gotten within 5 points of Cruz. By aligning himself with the far left, no borders crowd, he's taken Texas out of play for 2020 IMO.
What? This was video of Candace being a ****ing moron ON TWITTER. No traditional "media" to blame here.fadskier said:Separate issues that the press ran with the first narrative before waiting or investigating...BrooksBearLives said:fadskier said:
Let's see...Smollett, Covington kids, Kavanaugh, the press derserves to be threatened. Face it, the press investigates no more.
You just throwing **** at a wall? These are all separate issues.
Actually the media ran with the false narrative on both stories. What are YOU talking about?BrooksBearLives said:What? This was video of Candace being a ****ing moron ON TWITTER. No traditional "media" to blame here.fadskier said:Separate issues that the press ran with the first narrative before waiting or investigating...BrooksBearLives said:fadskier said:
Let's see...Smollett, Covington kids, Kavanaugh, the press derserves to be threatened. Face it, the press investigates no more.
You just throwing **** at a wall? These are all separate issues.
You guys are getting desperate.
BrooksBearLives said:What the **** are you even talking about? You have no idea what Beto's platform even was, it's obvious.YoakDaddy said:BrooksBearLives said:YoakDaddy said:Waco1947 said:Wichitabear said:
Beto is not going to win ****. Let him come down to South Texas. He has no idea what he is saying. Come and take it!!! Beto
Ahhhh, he's been to all the counties in Texas. He's been to all the border counties. He lives in a border city. So you're wrong.
So what if he's been to every county. Last I saw Beto, he lost an election and was unemployed. And when he ran for senate, he didn't have the cojones to campaign on removing border protections.
Technically, what you said is 100% true.
You're right. Republicans in Texas should just completely ignore him. Your logic is completely sound. No reason to worry AT ALL.
I never said ignore. Thats your comment. If he'd have stated that 6 months ago when he was running, he'd have never gotten within 5 points of Cruz. By aligning himself with the far left, no borders crowd, he's taken Texas out of play for 2020 IMO.
He wrote/co-sponsored multiple bills that would INCREASE border security and funding where it is ACTUALLY needed: in the Ports.
You are breath-takingly wrong.
Fuh? Some one said that he had not. I was correcting the accusation. Feel better now.YoakDaddy said:Waco1947 said:Wichitabear said:
Beto is not going to win ****. Let him come down to South Texas. He has no idea what he is saying. Come and take it!!! Beto
Ahhhh, he's been to all the counties in Texas. He's been to all the border counties. He lives in a border city. So you're wrong.
So what if he's been to every county. Last I saw Beto, he lost an election and was unemployed. And when he ran for senate, he didn't have the cojones to campaign on removing border protections.
fadskier said:Actually the media ran with the false narrative on both stories. What are YOU talking about?BrooksBearLives said:What? This was video of Candace being a ****ing moron ON TWITTER. No traditional "media" to blame here.fadskier said:Separate issues that the press ran with the first narrative before waiting or investigating...BrooksBearLives said:fadskier said:
Let's see...Smollett, Covington kids, Kavanaugh, the press derserves to be threatened. Face it, the press investigates no more.
You just throwing **** at a wall? These are all separate issues.
You guys are getting desperate.
Waco1947 said:Fuh? Some one said that he had not. I was correcting the accusation. Feel better now.YoakDaddy said:Waco1947 said:Wichitabear said:
Beto is not going to win ****. Let him come down to South Texas. He has no idea what he is saying. Come and take it!!! Beto
Ahhhh, he's been to all the counties in Texas. He's been to all the border counties. He lives in a border city. So you're wrong.
So what if he's been to every county. Last I saw Beto, he lost an election and was unemployed. And when he ran for senate, he didn't have the cojones to campaign on removing border protections.
Waco1947 said:
BBL correct again
There were a lot of factors in the decrease, most importantly the recession. As the economy improves the numbers will likely rise. There is also a major trend toward families crossing the border instead of individuals, which puts a lot more strain on law enforcement and the military.BrooksBearLives said:Sam Lowry said:Because the Republican isn't a left wing lunatic and the wall is something no one really had a problem with until about ten minutes ago.Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:Why isnt there more sad now when a republican actually doing it?quash said:RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:
Young Justin is gonna be sad!
Gonna be a lot of sad to go around when a Democrat in the White House looks around and sees emergencies everywhere.
Well, since illegal crossings have been dropping steadily, the need for the wall has dropped. It was always an extreme idea. But the problem was more pressing than it is now.
Be fair about that.
I have no idea as to what video you are referring to. I am referring to how the media ran with the Covington narrative before the entire video cam out and also with the Jussie story before all the facts came out. Who is Candace?BrooksBearLives said:fadskier said:Actually the media ran with the false narrative on both stories. What are YOU talking about?BrooksBearLives said:What? This was video of Candace being a ****ing moron ON TWITTER. No traditional "media" to blame here.fadskier said:Separate issues that the press ran with the first narrative before waiting or investigating...BrooksBearLives said:fadskier said:
Let's see...Smollett, Covington kids, Kavanaugh, the press derserves to be threatened. Face it, the press investigates no more.
You just throwing **** at a wall? These are all separate issues.
You guys are getting desperate.
What false narrative? It was video with the ENTIRE Question as well as her answer-which she doubled down on later.
What false narrative? You're so entrenched, you can't see how nuts how sound.
Listen, when your ideas suck, the "media" (reflection of the world) will tend to say you suck. Blame "the media" all you want. But at the end of the day, it's defending Hitler that makes you look like a ****ing moron, NOT "the media."
What a bunch of soft-headed wimps the right has become.
He also says that the wall works in El Paso...so there's that.Waco1947 said:Wichitabear said:
Beto is not going to win ****. Let him come down to South Texas. He has no idea what he is saying. Come and take it!!! Beto
Ahhhh, he's been to all the counties in Texas. He's been to all the border counties. He lives in a border city. So you're wrong.
He says that it doesn't... so there's that.fadskier said:He also says that the wall works in El Paso...so there's that.Waco1947 said:Wichitabear said:
Beto is not going to win ****. Let him come down to South Texas. He has no idea what he is saying. Come and take it!!! Beto
Ahhhh, he's been to all the counties in Texas. He's been to all the border counties. He lives in a border city. So you're wrong.
Actually, he says it does.quash said:He says that it doesn't... so there's that.fadskier said:He also says that the wall works in El Paso...so there's that.Waco1947 said:Wichitabear said:
Beto is not going to win ****. Let him come down to South Texas. He has no idea what he is saying. Come and take it!!! Beto
Ahhhh, he's been to all the counties in Texas. He's been to all the border counties. He lives in a border city. So you're wrong.
If he had stopped there, he might've been okay; instead, he continued and ended up accidentally making the case for those who argue that walls do in fact work: "And it has pushed migrants and asylum seekers and refugees to the most inhospitable, the most hostile stretches of the U.S.-Mexico border, ensuring their suffering and death."quash said:He says that it doesn't... so there's that.fadskier said:He also says that the wall works in El Paso...so there's that.Waco1947 said:Wichitabear said:
Beto is not going to win ****. Let him come down to South Texas. He has no idea what he is saying. Come and take it!!! Beto
Ahhhh, he's been to all the counties in Texas. He's been to all the border counties. He lives in a border city. So you're wrong.
The economy has been steadily growing for (checks the board) 9+ years. Immigration numbers have gone down since then, including border crossings.Sam Lowry said:There were a lot of factors in the decrease, most importantly the recession. As the economy improves the numbers will likely rise. There is also a major trend toward families crossing the border instead of individuals, which puts a lot more strain on law enforcement and the military.BrooksBearLives said:Sam Lowry said:Because the Republican isn't a left wing lunatic and the wall is something no one really had a problem with until about ten minutes ago.Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:Why isnt there more sad now when a republican actually doing it?quash said:RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:
Young Justin is gonna be sad!
Gonna be a lot of sad to go around when a Democrat in the White House looks around and sees emergencies everywhere.
Well, since illegal crossings have been dropping steadily, the need for the wall has dropped. It was always an extreme idea. But the problem was more pressing than it is now.
Be fair about that.
Did you even read that article?YoakDaddy said:BrooksBearLives said:What the **** are you even talking about? You have no idea what Beto's platform even was, it's obvious.YoakDaddy said:BrooksBearLives said:YoakDaddy said:Waco1947 said:Wichitabear said:
Beto is not going to win ****. Let him come down to South Texas. He has no idea what he is saying. Come and take it!!! Beto
Ahhhh, he's been to all the counties in Texas. He's been to all the border counties. He lives in a border city. So you're wrong.
So what if he's been to every county. Last I saw Beto, he lost an election and was unemployed. And when he ran for senate, he didn't have the cojones to campaign on removing border protections.
Technically, what you said is 100% true.
You're right. Republicans in Texas should just completely ignore him. Your logic is completely sound. No reason to worry AT ALL.
I never said ignore. Thats your comment. If he'd have stated that 6 months ago when he was running, he'd have never gotten within 5 points of Cruz. By aligning himself with the far left, no borders crowd, he's taken Texas out of play for 2020 IMO.
He wrote/co-sponsored multiple bills that would INCREASE border security and funding where it is ACTUALLY needed: in the Ports.
You are breath-takingly wrong.
And you are breathtakingly ignorant like your boy Beto. A link from the post above not only demonstrates his policy shift but also demonstrates his ignorance. Please find where during his recent senate campaign loss where he verbally campaigned on and stated that he'd tear down existing border walls. He couldn't because he'd have lost conservative democrat and independent votes. Like illegals, drug and sex traffickers slip through PoEs? I'm sure they do, but not like where there's no wall or barrier. Hahahaha!!!!
https://www.dailywire.com/news/43517/watch-beto-calls-tearing-down-border-walls-ends-james-barrett
BrooksBearLives said:Did you even read that article?YoakDaddy said:BrooksBearLives said:What the **** are you even talking about? You have no idea what Beto's platform even was, it's obvious.YoakDaddy said:BrooksBearLives said:YoakDaddy said:Waco1947 said:Wichitabear said:
Beto is not going to win ****. Let him come down to South Texas. He has no idea what he is saying. Come and take it!!! Beto
Ahhhh, he's been to all the counties in Texas. He's been to all the border counties. He lives in a border city. So you're wrong.
So what if he's been to every county. Last I saw Beto, he lost an election and was unemployed. And when he ran for senate, he didn't have the cojones to campaign on removing border protections.
Technically, what you said is 100% true.
You're right. Republicans in Texas should just completely ignore him. Your logic is completely sound. No reason to worry AT ALL.
I never said ignore. Thats your comment. If he'd have stated that 6 months ago when he was running, he'd have never gotten within 5 points of Cruz. By aligning himself with the far left, no borders crowd, he's taken Texas out of play for 2020 IMO.
He wrote/co-sponsored multiple bills that would INCREASE border security and funding where it is ACTUALLY needed: in the Ports.
You are breath-takingly wrong.
And you are breathtakingly ignorant like your boy Beto. A link from the post above not only demonstrates his policy shift but also demonstrates his ignorance. Please find where during his recent senate campaign loss where he verbally campaigned on and stated that he'd tear down existing border walls. He couldn't because he'd have lost conservative democrat and independent votes. Like illegals, drug and sex traffickers slip through PoEs? I'm sure they do, but not like where there's no wall or barrier. Hahahaha!!!!
https://www.dailywire.com/news/43517/watch-beto-calls-tearing-down-border-walls-ends-james-barrett
I'm just trying to gauge whether you're intentionally ignorant, or just lazy.
In 2009 Southwest border apprehensions fell under 600K for the first time since 1975. Since then they've fluctuated around 400K per year. I don't expect anything to happen suddenly, but assuming continued economic growth it wouldn't be at all surprising to see 1M per year a decade from now.BrooksBearLives said:The economy has been steadily growing for (checks the board) 9+ years. Immigration numbers have gone down since then, including border crossings.Sam Lowry said:There were a lot of factors in the decrease, most importantly the recession. As the economy improves the numbers will likely rise. There is also a major trend toward families crossing the border instead of individuals, which puts a lot more strain on law enforcement and the military.BrooksBearLives said:Sam Lowry said:Because the Republican isn't a left wing lunatic and the wall is something no one really had a problem with until about ten minutes ago.Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:Why isnt there more sad now when a republican actually doing it?quash said:RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:
Young Justin is gonna be sad!
Gonna be a lot of sad to go around when a Democrat in the White House looks around and sees emergencies everywhere.
Well, since illegal crossings have been dropping steadily, the need for the wall has dropped. It was always an extreme idea. But the problem was more pressing than it is now.
Be fair about that.
And those numbers are even soft as border crossings seeking asylum have increased.
I'm curious where you get your idea that they're suddenly going to jump.
Work = dead people.fadskier said:If he had stopped there, he might've been okay; instead, he continued and ended up accidentally making the case for those who argue that walls do in fact work: "And it has pushed migrants and asylum seekers and refugees to the most inhospitable, the most hostile stretches of the U.S.-Mexico border, ensuring their suffering and death."quash said:He says that it doesn't... so there's that.fadskier said:He also says that the wall works in El Paso...so there's that.Waco1947 said:Wichitabear said:
Beto is not going to win ****. Let him come down to South Texas. He has no idea what he is saying. Come and take it!!! Beto
Ahhhh, he's been to all the counties in Texas. He's been to all the border counties. He lives in a border city. So you're wrong.
In other words, the walls do deter illegal crossings where they are built. It's also worth noting that those "asylum seekers" O'Rourke references would be deliberately attempting to cross at illegal points instead of seeking out legal ports of entry where they would apply for asylum. In other words, they are not would-be "asylum seekers" by definition: they are would-be illegal aliens
Surely your're not that off. He's saying that the wall prevents people from crossing so they try to cross at more dangerous places where there is no wall.quash said:Work = dead people.fadskier said:If he had stopped there, he might've been okay; instead, he continued and ended up accidentally making the case for those who argue that walls do in fact work: "And it has pushed migrants and asylum seekers and refugees to the most inhospitable, the most hostile stretches of the U.S.-Mexico border, ensuring their suffering and death."quash said:He says that it doesn't... so there's that.fadskier said:He also says that the wall works in El Paso...so there's that.Waco1947 said:Wichitabear said:
Beto is not going to win ****. Let him come down to South Texas. He has no idea what he is saying. Come and take it!!! Beto
Ahhhh, he's been to all the counties in Texas. He's been to all the border counties. He lives in a border city. So you're wrong.
In other words, the walls do deter illegal crossings where they are built. It's also worth noting that those "asylum seekers" O'Rourke references would be deliberately attempting to cross at illegal points instead of seeking out legal ports of entry where they would apply for asylum. In other words, they are not would-be "asylum seekers" by definition: they are would-be illegal aliens
Ok pal.
Doc Holliday said:
Roughly 80% of all voters say U.S. needs secure borders, including 68% of Democrats: Harvard poll